Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Biodiversity and Antibacterial Potential of the Culturable Soil Fungi in Nyingchi, Tibet
Previous Article in Journal
RNA-Seq Insight into the Impact and Mechanisms of Methyl Donor and Glycine Betaine Osmoprotectant on Polyketide Secondary Metabolism in Monascus purpureus M1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isothermal Detection Methods for Fungal Pathogens in Closed Environment Agriculture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection

1
Plant Sciences Department, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Tarshish 2, Kiryat Shmona 1101600, Israel
2
Faculty of Sciences, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Tel-Hai 1220800, Israel
J. Fungi 2025, 11(4), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11040274
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 31 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection)
Fungi represent the largest group of plant pathogens, infecting their hosts via leaves, seeds, and roots. These pathogens cause significant crop damage through diverse mechanisms, leading to reduced global production and an ongoing demand for innovative control strategies [1,2]. Effective management of fungal diseases in crops depends upon a comprehensive understanding of the fungi involved, identifying susceptible growth stages, and recognizing environmental factors that influence disease progression [3].
Chemical pesticides have long been fundamental in crop protection strategies against phytopathogens [4]. Nevertheless, growing public concerns regarding synthetic chemical usage [5] and the emergence of fungicide-resistant fungal strains [6] necessitate the exploration of alternative, environmentally friendly approaches [7,8]. Despite these concerns, traditional chemical methods have proven highly effective, especially in severe disease outbreaks, benefiting from well-established production and supply chains, and are familiar to farmers and agricultural field guides. Therefore, integrating biological and chemical approaches (mixed-method management) has been proposed as a transitional strategy from conventional chemical interventions toward greener technologies [9,10,11]. Such combinations may also enhance the robustness and stability of protective microorganisms under varying environmental conditions, ultimately benefiting agricultural practices.
At present, there is an increasing global scientific emphasis on developing sustainable crop production methods capable of meeting growing demands without environmental harm. Utilizing resistant cultivars is a promising method due to its low cost and compatibility with various agricultural practices [12]. However, phytopathologists have noted the emergence of highly aggressive pathogen strains capable of overcoming cultivar resistance, thus compromising their effectiveness [13,14].
Recently, biological control agents (BCAs) have gained considerable attention as potential tools for managing fungal diseases [15,16,17]. Specific BCAs, such as Trichoderma spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, Beauveria bassiana, and Gliocladium spp., offer numerous benefits for crop protection. Some BCAs function as beneficial endophytes, living symbiotically within plants [18,19,20].
Exploring innovative green technologies to enhance fungal pathogen control is a critical priority, and the full potential of these advancements is only beginning to unfold [21]. Cutting-edge technologies, including microbiome engineering, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), genome editing, RNA interference, and functional peptides, could facilitate precise and sustainable management strategies for fungal diseases in agriculture [22,23,24]. Microbiome-based solutions and nanoparticles enable targeted pathogen suppression with minimal environmental impacts, while AI and machine learning significantly enhance disease detection accuracy—such as analyzing remote-sensing data for field monitoring and treatment optimization [25,26]. Furthermore, advancements in molecular diagnostics, such as endpoint PCR and real-time PCR, have revolutionized accurate pathogen identification, enabling early detection and improved disease management strategies [27,28].
This Special Issue comprises two review articles and eleven original research papers, highlighting recent innovations and scientific advances in plant fungal diseases and their agricultural implications. It also includes discussions of non-pathogenic fungi associated with plants that influence disease onset and severity. The broad range of topics covered underscores the complex challenges we face in modern agriculture, including significant diseases affecting various hosts—from fruit trees and woody oil plants to staple crops, such as soybean, potato, wheat, strawberries, and even edible mushrooms, such as morels (Morchella spp.) and white button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). Furthermore, it explores innovative biocontrol methods and novel weed management approaches by mycoherbicide.
I extend my sincere appreciation to all contributing authors and reviewers whose valuable efforts were crucial for the successful publication of this Special Issue. Given the complexity and dynamic nature of ensuring global crop health, food security, and sustainable agriculture under global changes, including climate change and industrialization, there are significant challenges ahead in developing and optimizing effective fungal control technologies. The promising outcomes of ongoing research should encourage stakeholders and industry partners to actively translate these innovative management strategies into practical agricultural applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mapuranga, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, L.; Chang, J.; Yang, W. Infection strategies and pathogenicity of biotrophic plant fungal pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 799396. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rodriguez-Moreno, L.; Ebert, M.K.; Bolton, M.D.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Tools of the crook- infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens. Plant J. 2018, 93, 664–674. [Google Scholar]
  3. Doehlemann, G.; Ökmen, B.; Zhu, W.; Sharon, A. Plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, W.; Li, M.; Achal, V. A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerg. Contam. 2025, 11, 100410. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shekhar, C.; Khosya, R.; Thakur, K.; Mahajan, D.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, A.K. A systematic review of pesticide exposure, associated risks, and long-term human health impacts. Toxicol. Rep. 2024, 13, 101840. [Google Scholar]
  6. Castroagudín, V.L.; Ceresini, P.C.; de Oliveira, S.C.; Reges, J.T.; Maciel, J.L.; Bonato, A.L.; Dorigan, A.F.; McDonald, B.A. Resistance to QOI fungicides is widespread in Brazilian populations of the wheat blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 284–294. [Google Scholar]
  7. Madlhophe, S.; Ogugua, U.V.; Makhubu, F.N.; Figlan, S. Use of biological control agents for managing fungal pathogens in Solanaceae crops: Progress and future perspectives—A review. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 83. [Google Scholar]
  8. Thambugala, K.M.; Daranagama, D.A.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Kannangara, S.D.; Promputtha, I. Fungi vs. Fungi in biocontrol: An overview of fungal antagonists applied against fungal plant pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 604923. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordani, A.; Hijazi, B.; Dimant, E.; Degani, O. Integrated biological and chemical control against the maize late wilt agent Magnaporthiopsis maydis. Soil Syst. 2023, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ons, L.; Bylemans, D.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.A. Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ruano-Rosa, D.; Arjona-Girona, I.; López-Herrera, C. Integrated control of avocado white root rot combining low concentrations of fluazinam and Trichoderma spp. Crop Prot. 2018, 112, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mundt, C.C. Durable resistance: A key to sustainable management of pathogens and pests. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 27, 446–455. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shofman, G.; Degani, O. Mixed fungal strains challenge host resistance: Insights into Magnaporthiopsis maydis pathogenicity in maize. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1520237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Holmes, G.J.; Ojiambo, P.S.; Hausbeck, M.K.; Quesada-Ocampo, L.; Keinath, A.P. Resurgence of Cucurbit Downy Mildew in the United States: A Watershed Event for Research and Extension. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 428–441. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghazy, N.; El-Nahrawy, S. Siderophore production by Bacillus subtilis mf497446 and Pseudomonas koreensis mg209738 and their efficacy in controlling Cephalosporium maydis in maize plant. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 203, 1195–1209. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pandit, M.A.; Kumar, J.; Gulati, S.; Bhandari, N.; Mehta, P.; Katyal, R.; Rawat, C.D.; Mishra, V.; Kaur, J. Major biological control strategies for plant pathogens. Pathogens 2022, 11, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elnahal, A.S.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Rady, M.M.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A. The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: A review. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 759–792. [Google Scholar]
  18. Degani, O.; Danielle, R.; Dor, S. The microflora of maize grains as a biological barrier against the late wilt causal agent, Magnaporthiopsis maydis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, C.; Xu, J.; Qi, Q.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Peng, D.; Ruan, L. Endophyte Bacillus subtilis evade plant defense by producing lantibiotic subtilomycin to mask self-produced flagellin. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 368. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gond, S.K.; Bergen, M.S.; Torres, M.S.; White, J.F., Jr. Endophytic Bacillus spp. Produce antifungal lipopeptides and induce host defence gene expression in maize. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 172, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Groundbreaking technologies and the biocontrol of fungal vascular plant pathogens. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nizamani, M.M.; Hughes, A.C.; Zhang, H.-L.; Wang, Y. Revolutionizing agriculture with nanotechnology: Innovative approaches in fungal disease management and plant health monitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 928, 172473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.R.; Noman, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Lu, Z.; Cai, Y.; Ahmed, T.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; et al. Integrating RNA interference and nanotechnology: A transformative approach in plant protection. Plants 2025, 14, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Montesinos, E. Functional peptides for plant disease control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2023, 61, 301–324. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, A.; Jacob, M.; Shoshani, G.; Charter, M. Using computer vision, image analysis and uavs for the automatic recognition and counting of common cranes (Grus grus). J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 328, 116948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, C. Remote sensing and precision agriculture technologies for crop disease detection and management with a practical application example. Engineering 2020, 6, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hariharan, G.; Prasannath, K. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics of fungal plant pathogens: A mini review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 600234. [Google Scholar]
  28. Degani, O.; Becher, P.; Gordani, A. Real-time PCR early detection of Trichoderma treatments efficiency against cotton charcoal rot disease. J. Nat. Pestic. Res. 2023, 4, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Degani, O. Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11040274

AMA Style

Degani O. Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(4):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11040274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Degani, Ofir. 2025. "Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 4: 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11040274

APA Style

Degani, O. (2025). Plant Fungal Diseases and Crop Protection. Journal of Fungi, 11(4), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11040274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop