Next Article in Journal
Diagnostic Methods and Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Mortality in Blastomycosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Phylogeny Reveal Vamsapriyaceae fam. nov. (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes) with Two Novel Vamsapriya Species
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Survey of Characteristic Features of Yeast Cell Death Triggered by External Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ganoderma (Ganodermataceae, Basidiomycota) Species from the Greater Mekong Subregion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/jof7110887
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Floccularia luteovirens, a Rare Edible Fungus in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Provide Insights into the Taxonomy Placement and Fruiting Body Formation

by
Zhengjie Liu
1,2,
Hongyun Lu
1,
Xinglin Zhang
1 and
Qihe Chen
1,*
1
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
College of Food and Pharmacy, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(11), 887; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110887
Submission received: 16 September 2021 / Revised: 16 October 2021 / Accepted: 16 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Classification of Environmental Fungi)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Floccularia luteovirens is a famous and precious edible mushroom (Huang Mogu) on the Qinghai–Tibet plateau that has a unique flavor and remarkable medical functions. Herein, we report a reference-grade 27 Mb genome of F. luteovirens containing 7068 protein-coding genes. The genome component and gene functions were predicted. Genome ontology enrichment and pathway analyses indicated the potential production capacity for terpenoids, polyketides and polysaccharides. Moreover, 16 putative gene clusters and 145 genes coding for secondary metabolites were obtained, including guadinomine and melleolides. In addition, phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses shed light on the precise classification of F. luteovirens suggesting that it belongs to the genus Floccularia instead of Armillaria. RNA-sequencing and comparative transcriptomic analysis revealed differentially expressed genes during four developmental stages of F. luteovirens, that of which helps to identify important genes regulating fruiting body formation for strain modification. This study will provide insight into artificial cultivation and increase the production of useful metabolites.

1. Introduction

Floccularia luteovirens (also known as Armillaria luteovirens (Alb. and Schwein.) Sacc.), as a well-known unique Chinese medicinal and edible basidiomycete, is mainly distributed in the meadows and grasslands of Qinghai–Tibet plateau (Figure S1A,B) [1]. As a traditional Tibetan medicine, F. luteovirens is frequently used for the treatment of neurasthenia, dizziness, insomnia, headaches, infantile convulsions and numbness in limbs. It has been a tribute since recommended by Empress Dowager Cixi in the Qing Dynasty. To the best of our knowledge, as the unique local species, F. luteovirens is found to have significant biological activities against radiation, hypoxia, and cancer in the previous studies [2,3,4]. Therefore, the chemical compounds with officinal value in F. luteovirens have been analyzed for their pharmacological properties [4,5,6,7,8]. However, our understanding of F. luteovirens biology is limited despite its medicinal value due to little information about this species. There is scarce literature describing the genomic composition, genetic characteristics, and metabolism genes for secondary metabolites in F. luteovirens. Besides, as reported in previous studies, the taxonomic status of F. luteovirens has not been fully elucidated, especially at the genomic level. Some researchers even used the name “Armillaria luteovirens” in the articles of F. luteovirens [2,4,5,6,7,9]. Moreover, many nucleotide sequences of F. luteovirens were submitted to the NCBI Nucleotide database with the name “Armillaria luteovirens”. As a result, research reports on F. luteovirens were confusing. It was only in recent years that researchers have begun to use the name F. luteovirens in general [10,11,12]. NCBI removed the webpage of Armillaria luteovirens in the Taxonomy Database in 2019, which means researchers reached an agreement that this rare edible fungus belongs to the genus Floccularia instead of Armillaria. However, there were few articles about the species classification of F. luteovirens. Therefore, it is obligated to fully elucidate the taxonomic status of F. luteovirens at the genomic level. Moreover, wild F. luteovirens fruiting bodies are becoming scarce resources. In the main producing area Qilian County, the production of Floccularia luteovirens was 6000 kg in 2017 and the production declined in recent years due to the environmental damage in the growing region. In addition, the harvest of wild F. luteovirens fruiting bodies is annual and the artificial cultivation of F. luteovirens has been unsuccessful to harvest fruiting bodies. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanism of fruiting body formation in this special mushroom.
In this work, we report a 27 Mb draft genome sequence of F. luteovirens C10. The genome information was used to analyze the genome composition and gene function. Considering the medicinal value of F. luteovirens, the gene clusters associated with bioactive secondary metabolites were also detected. Due to the long-standing debate focusing on the strain classification of F. luteovirens, we tried to demonstrate its taxonomic status at the genomic level. Lastly, we used comparative transcriptome analysis to identify the candidate genes influencing F. luteovirens fruiting body formation. The genome and transcriptome sequence of F. luteovirens would provide insight into this precious macrofungus and will be useful for developing a strategy for artificial cultivation and increasing the production of useful metabolites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of F. luteovirens and Cultivation Method

Mycelia of F. luteovirens were isolated and screened from an F. luteovirens fruiting body growing in the steppe of Qilian Mountain, Qinghai, China. This culture collection which had been originally isolated in our laboratory, was named FLZJUC10 (strain C10 in this work). Mycelium was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slant at 25 °C and monthly subcultured. For transcriptome samples, we selected four major developmental stages of F. luteovirens which were mycelium (MY), primordium (PR), young fruiting body (YF), and mature fruiting body (MF). To RNA-seq each growing stage, three individual samples were used as three biological replicas.

2.2. Library Preparation and High-Throughput Sequencing

For genome sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted using a modified cetrimonium bromide (CTAB) procedure [13]. Libraries for single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing were constructed with an insert size of 20 kb using the SMRTbell Template Prep kit 1.0 (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Subsequently, the genome of C10 was sequenced using PacBio Sequel platform by single-molecule, real-time (SMRT) technology [14] and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 at the Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The low-quality reads were filtered by the SMRT Link v5.1.0 [14,15] and the filtered reads were assembled to generate one contig without gaps.
For transcriptome sequencing, the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to powder. Subsequently, the total RNA of the samples was prepared with Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA-seq transcriptome library was prepared following the TruSeqTM RNA Sample Preparation Kit from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA). Subsequently, RNA-seq was performed with the Illumina Novaseq 6000 (2 × 150 bp read length) at Majorbio technology Inc. (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Transcriptome Reads Mapping

The raw paired-end reads from RNA-seq were trimmed and quality controlled by SeqPrep (https://github.com/jstjohn/SeqPrep, accessed on 25 August 2018) and Sickle (https://github.com/najoshi/sickle, accessed on 25 August 2018) with default parameters. Then clean reads were separately aligned to reference genome with orientation mode using TopHat (http://tophat.cbcb.umd.edu/, Version 2.1.1, accessed on 13 October 2018) [16] software. The C10 genome sequence was used as the reference genome. The mapping criteria of bowtie was as follows: sequencing reads should be uniquely matched to the genome allowing up to two mismatches, without insertions or deletions. Then, the region of the gene was expanded following depths of sites and the operon was obtained. Besides, the whole genome was split into multiple 15 kb windows that share 5 kb. New transcribed regions were defined as more than two consecutive windows without overlapped regions of gene, where at least two reads per window mapped in the same orientation.

2.4. Analysis of Genome Composition

Genome component prediction included the prediction of the coding genes, repetitive sequences, and non-coding RNA. The available steps were proceeded as follows: The Augustus 2.7 program [17] was employed to retrieve the related coding genes. The interspersed repetitive sequences were predicted using the RepeatMasker [18] (http://www.repeatmasker.org/, accessed on 30 October 2018). The tandem repeats were analyzed by the TRF (tandem repeats finder) [19]. Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes were predicted by the tRNAscan-SE [20]. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes were analyzed by the rRNAmmer [21]. sRNA, snRNA and miRNA were predicted by BLAST against the Rfam database [22].

2.5. Gene Functional Annotation

We used eight databases to predict gene functions. They were GO (Gene Ontology, http://geneontology.org/, accessed on 26 March 2019) [23], KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, https://www.kegg.jp/, accessed on 24 March 2019) [24,25], KOG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/, accessed on 25 March 2019) [26], NR (Non-Redundant Protein Database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/, accessed on 26 March 2019) [27], TCDB (Transporter Classification Database, http://www.tcdb.org, accessed on 27 March 2019), P450 Database (http://p450.riceblast.snu.ac.kr/cyp.php, accessed on 27 March 2019) [28], and Swiss-Prot (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 28 March 2019) [29], respectively. A whole-genome Blast search (E-value less than 1 × 10−5, minimal alignment length percentage larger than 40%) was performed against above-mentioned databases. The secretory proteins were predicted by the SignalP database (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/, Version 4.1, accessed on 27 March 2019) [30]. Meanwhile, we analyzed the secondary metabolism gene clusters by the antiSMASH 5.0 (https://fungismash.secondarymetabolites.org/, accessed on 28 March 2019) [31]. Carbohydrate-active enzymes were predicted by the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database (http://www.cazy.org/, accessed on 30 February 2019) [32,33]. For transcriptome, the genes functional annotation referred to the result of the genome sequence.

2.6. Phylogenetic and Comparative Genomic Analyses

Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses included the construction of the phylogenetic tree and the genomic synteny analysis. Phylogenetic analysis of F. luteovirens C10 based on the ITS and LSU sequences (retrieved from genome sequencing data). Phylogenetic tree derived from the ITS and LSU sequences analysis of strain C10 and related fungi which were selected from the NR annotation result. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method [34]. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [35]. Calocera viscosa was used as the outgroup. The tree was drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [36]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted with MEGA 7 [37]. Genomic synteny of C10 and reference genomes was analyzed using GATA [38].

2.7. Differential Expression Analysis and Functional Enrichment

To identify DEGs (differential expression genes) between two different samples, the expression level of each transcript was calculated according to the fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (FPKM) method. RSEM [39] was used to quantify gene abundances. R statistical package software EdgeR (Empirical Analysis of Digital Gene Expression in R) [40] was utilized for differential expression analysis. In addition, functional-enrichment analysis including GO and KEGG were performed to identify which DEGs were significantly enriched in GO terms and metabolic pathways at Bonferroni-corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 compared with the whole-transcriptome background. GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were carried out by Goatools (https://github.com/tanghaibao/Goatools, accessed on 30 May 2019) and KOBAS 2.1.1 (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/download.php, accessed on 30 May 2019) [41].

2.8. RT-qPCR Validation

Total RNA obtained in the transcriptome sequencing experiment was used to synthesize cDNA with Prime ScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Primers for RT-qPCR were designed in Primer-BLAST [42] of NCBI (Table S1). Beta-tubulin and GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) were the internal reference genes. The RT-qPCR was performed using QuantStudio 3 system (Life Technologies, Camarillo, CA, USA) and the expression levels of genes were calculated by the 2−∆∆CT method.

2.9. Data Availability

The genome data in this study have been submitted to GenBank’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession number ASM973921v1. The RNA-seq data have been deposited in NCBI under accession number PRJNA616182. The alignment files for the phylogenetic tree had been deposited in TreeBASE under accession number 26577.

3. Results

3.1. Strain Isolation and General Genome Features of F. luteovirens

Floccularia luteovirens strain C10 was isolated from a typical F. luteovirens fruiting body (Figure S1C). The hyphae of colonies on PDA plates were white, fluff-like, and with aerial growth (Figure S1D). Using a light microscope, the hyphae of C10 were hyaline, septate, and branching, and the clamp connections of hyphae were observed clearly and no spores were observed (Figure S1E). The ITS sequence obtained with primers ITS4 and ITS5 was used to determine the identity in a BLAST nucleotide search of NCBI and exactly matched the ITS region of Armillaria luteovirens (GenBank accession GCA_009739215.1) with 100% similarity. The search result indicated that the strain C10 was a pure culture strain of F. luteovirens (A. luteovirens).
With the PacBio Sequel and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 sequencer, raw data containing 378,128 reads and 5213.4 million bases were obtained. The low-quality reads were filtered by the SMRT Link 5.1.0 and the filtered reads were assembled to generate 24 polished contigs (Figures S2 and S3). According to the coverage and the GC content, the assembly was estimated and optimized, and finally, the draft genome sequence of F. luteovirens C10 was obtained. The genome sequence was 27 Mb and consisted of 23 contigs with an N50 of 2.3 Mb and a GC content of 43.54% (Table 1 and Figures S4 and S5). Previous studies [43] reported that the assembled genome size of F. luteovirens was 28.8 Mb, and comprising 183 contigs with a N50 contig size of 571 kb and a GC content of 43.36%. It indicated that this study provided a more accurate genome assembly of F. luteovirens. After contigs optimized, 16 contigs-containing distribution maps of F. luteovirens genomic features were constructed (Figure 1).
As to genome composition, 7068 coding genes (Figure S6), 93 tRNA genes, 7 rRNA genes, and 11 snRNA genes were predicted, and the relative abundances of the different tRNA genes are shown in Figure S7. The interspersed repetitive sequences represent approximately 2.27% of the genome, including 1701 long terminal repeats, 395 DNA transposons, 444 long interspersed repeated segments, 10 short interspersed repeated segments. Comparing to interspersed repetitive sequences, there are 2362 tandem repeat sequences (repeat size 1–509 bp), including 2027 minisatellite DNAs (repeat size 10–60 bp) and 132 microsatellite DNAs (repeat size 2–6 bp) (Tables S2–S4). The interspersed repetitive sequences content of F. luteovirens was lower than medicinal mushroom Lignosus rhinocerotis which was reported as 4.01% of the assembled genome. The genome size and number of predicted genes are consistent with five other medicinal mushrooms (Table S5). All the assembly data indicated that whole genome allows a detailed analysis of the gene content, phylogeny, and metabolic pathway of F. luteovirens.

3.2. Gene Function Annotation and Analysis

The result of genome functional annotation was summarized in Table S6. In the analysis of GO classification, 4680 genes were annotated with the three main categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively (Figure 2A). The identified coding proteins associated with biological process are more than molecular function and cellular component proteins. In the KEGG pathway annotation, the 5854 predicated genes could be divided into 43 categories based on their functions (Figure 2B). Among these categories, 672 genes associated with the metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides accounted for the largest proportion, which indicates that F. luteovirens was a potential resource for terpenoids and polyketides biosynthesis. Besides, 257 genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism could be the reason for F. luteovirens being rich in polysaccharides [2,3,8]. Chen et al. [44] reported the genomic analyses of Hericium erinaceus, which was also a famous medicinal and edible basidiomycete. In this genome, only 60 genes were found in terpenoids and polyketides biosynthesis while carbohydrate metabolism contained the highest gene number (479 genes). In KOG analysis, the 1532 predicated genes can be divided into 24 categories, according to their functions (Figure 2D). Among these categories, the number of genes related to posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (O), translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis (J), energy production and conversion (C), and amino acid transport and metabolism (E) were more than the other function-related genes. In the CAZy annotation, 365 candidate carbohydrate-active enzyme genes (CAZymes) were identified in the genome of the C10 strain. Interestingly, the glycoside hydrolase (159) dominated in the classes of CAZymes (Figure 2C), followed by 54 carbohydrate-binding modules, 18 carbohydrate esterases, 58 glycosyl transferases, 8 polysaccharide lyases, and 68 auxiliary activities enzymes. The CAZymes profile in F. luteovirens was also compared to those of seven other fungi, of which one: ectomycorrhizal fungus (Laccaria bicolor), four: white-rot fungi (Lentinula edodes, Flammulina velutipes, Ganoderma lucidum, and Phanerochaete chrysosporium), and two: brown-rot fungi (Antrodia cinnamomea and Postia placenta) (Table S7).

3.3. Cytochrome P450s and Transporters

According to previous studies, cytochrome P450s and transporters had important roles in the biosynthesis and transportation of fungal metabolites [45,46,47]. Thus, we identified the genes belonging to these families in the F. luteovirens genome. We identified a total of 145 CYP450 sequences, which could be classified into nine classes according to standardized CYP nomenclature (Figure 3A and Table S8) [48]. Among these classes, the group I class was found to have the greatest number of genes (94 genes). As to transporters, a total of 286 transport proteins belonging to 103 families were identified in F. luteovirens (Figure 3C,D and Table S9). The data of these transporters classification showed that 16 transporters belonged to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) and 9 transporters belonged to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. It was found that the MFS transporters participated in secondary metabolism, and the ATP-binding cassette transporters were involved in the transport of polysaccharides and lipids [49].

3.4. The Composition of Biosynthesis Gene Clusters (BGCs)

In the process of screening BGCs with antiSMASH 5.0, 16 putative gene clusters and 145 genes coding for secondary metabolites were obtained (Figure 3B). There were one siderophore BGC, two T1pks (type I PKS cluster) BGCs, five NRPS (Nonribosomal peptide synthetase cluster)-like BGCs, and eight terpene BGCs. Nevertheless, most of BGCs were unable to determine their roles with only a few similar genes. There was a guadinomine BGC with 14% similarity and a melleolides BGC with 100% similarity (Table S10) which belonged to the type I PKS cluster. However, considering that guadinomine was generally thought to be produced by bacteria [50], the guadinomine BGC with 14% similarity still worthy of further investigation. On the other hand, the melleolides BGC with 100% similarity was noteworthy. Melleolides, a family of sesquiterpene aryl esters, are natural products with various bioactivities including anti-inflammation, antimicrobial, antifungal, and cytotoxicity against cancer cells [51,52,53]. According to previous studies [54,55,56], the biosynthetic pathway of melleolides was demonstrated as shown in Figure 4. Among 14 genes in the melleolides BGC (Figure S8), the genes A5734, A5736 (armB), and A5737 (armH4) encode cytochrome P450, orsellinic acid synthase, and flavin-dependent halogenase, respectively, which had a direct relation with the melleolides biosynthesis [55,56]. With previous methods [52,57,58], melleolide I was isolated and identified from the liquid fungal cultures of C10 (Figure S9) according to the available standards, which confirmed the biosynthesis of melleolides.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis of Strain C10

In the NR database, 6136 genes were annotated by BlastP with E-values of  ≤1 × 10−5. The top 30 species with high similarities were listed in Figure S10 according to the number of the matched protein-coding genes. Interestingly, the species most similar to C10 does not belong to the genus Armillaria. In the NR annotation, there were three matched species belonging to the genus Armillaria, namely A. ostoyae, A. solidipes, and A. gallica, in which the number of the matched genes was only 56, 55, and 43, respectively. In contrast, the top 3 species closer to C10 were Hypsizygus marmoreus (1263 matched genes), Laccaria amethystina (863 matched genes), and Galerina marginata (638 matched genes). As well known, in the past decades F. luteovirens (also known as Armillaria luteo-virens Sacc.) was considered to belong to the genus Armillaria. However, more researchers have recommended reclassifying this species in recent years according to the phylogenetic analysis [1]. Therefore, we used the ITS sequence to determine the phylogeny of the C10 strain. Phylogenetic tree was constructed to demonstrate its taxonomic status. In Figure 5A, C10 was clustered together with Hypsizygus marmoreus and Termitomyces sp. with 92% similarity. Besides, C10 was evolutionally close to Laccaria amethystina and Laccaria bicolor which belong to the family Tricholomataceae. Interestingly, the phylogenetic tree suggested that C10 was evolutionarily distant from Armillaria ostoyae and Armillaria gallica which belong to family Physalacriaceae genus Armillaria. Therefore, we selected several species belonging to the family Tricholomataceae and Lyophyllaceae to construct phylogenetic trees, separately. In Figure 5B, C10 was clustered together with Floccularia albolanaripes with 100% similarity. On the contrary, C10 was evolutionarily distant from the species of family Lyophyllaceae (Figure 5C). To compare the phylogeny of C10 between Tricholomataceae and Lyophyllaceae, we constructed a phylogenetic tree with several species belonging to the family Tricholomataceae and Lyophyllaceae. The analysis results suggested that C10 was evolutionally close to the fungi of Tricholomataceae and was clustered together with Floccularia albolanaripes with 100% similarity (Figure 5D). Though the phylogenetic trees did not match with the result of NR exactly, both of the results of phylogenetic trees and NR implied that C10 belongs to the genus Floccularia instead of Armillaria (Table S11). The alignment files for phylogenetic tree had been deposited in TreeBASE under accession number 26577.
Synteny analysis of strain C10 genome with other three fungal genomes, Armillaria gallica (Physalacriaceae), Hypsizygus marmoreus (Lyophyllaceae), and Lepista sordida (Tricholomataceae), revealed that the C10 genome displayed different synteny with those fungi (Figure 5E–G). Of all the sequenced genomes, C10 showed higher synteny with Lepista sordida than others, which was similar to the result of phylogenetic trees. At least, the findings of synteny analysis indicated that C10 was evolutionarily distant from the species of Armillaria.

3.6. Transcriptome Sequencing and Assembly

To characterize the expressed sequences of F. luteovirens, we conducted transcriptome sequencing of four major developmental stages in F. luteovirens which were mycelium (MY), primordium (PR), young fruiting body (YF), and mature fruiting body (MF). Overall, total RNA was extracted from samples (Figure S11) to obtain cDNA libraries. 661,379,108 raw reads were generated from 13 cDNA libraries (Table S12). After data filtering and trimming, 655,992,276 high-quality clean reads were obtained. Subsequently, with the C10 genome sequence as the reference genome, we assembled 6860 genes. The correlation between the two samples was analyzed based on the TPM result (Figure S12). As showed in the Venn plot of gene expression analysis (Figure 6A and Figure S13), 6189 genes were co-expressed during all four developmental stages of F. luteovirens. In contrast, 136, 9, 6, and 16 genes were specifically expressed only during the MY, PR, YF, and MF stages, respectively.

3.7. The Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) Regulated Fruiting Body Formation

To further identify and evaluate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we constructed three DEG libraries to compare MY to PR, PR to YF, YF to MF. Overall, we detected 1265, 147, and 39 up-regulated DEGs and 1122, 235, and 32 down-regulated DEGs between MY and PR libraries, PR and YF libraries, YF and MF libraries, respectively (Figure 6C–F). As illustrated in Figure 6C,D, the largest number of DEGs occurred during the vegetative-to-reproductive transition stage-from MY to PR. This finding reveals that the period of MY to PR was the most active and key for fruiting body formation of F. luteovirens.
At first, functional enrichment analysis was conducted using all DEGs against the GO database in order to investigate DEGs involved in development and reproduction. Six genes associated with GO terms related to developmental process, reproduction, and reproductive process were identified. Among them, four genes (A2498, A1881, A6933, and A4619) showed up-regulation while two genes (A3758 and A1717) showed down-regulation during the vegetative-to-reproductive transition (Figure 6B). Notably, the gene A3758 directly associated with GO terms related to negative regulation of reproductive process showed down-regulation.
Subsequently, with the pipeline of the transcription factor database and the functionally annotated DEG libraries, we identified DEGs belonging to transcription factors (TF), which were found to be essential for growth and reproduction [59,60,61,62,63]. Two MADS-box genes (A0733 and A5568) (Figure 6B) which were transcription factors of morphogenesis were identified. The gene A0733 showed up-regulated expression while the gene A5568 down-regulated expression separately during the mycelia, primordia, and fruiting body stages. Moreover, other transcription factors were also identified, such as the genes bZIP (A5121), bHLH (A0367), prz1 (A3021), steA (A2106), and YABBY (A2001). These genes were up-regulated in either the primordia or fruiting body stage, or in both stages. Among them, the gene A2001 related to multicellular organism development was also up-regulated expression during reproductive growth.
In order to search for the functional pathways of interest involved in the fruiting process, we performed the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. The results indicated that the genes involved in the cell cycle (ko04111), ribosome (ko03010), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling (ko04011) pathways were differentially expressed significantly during reproductive growth. In the cell cycle and meiosis pathways (Figure S14), these DEGs included genes encoding sister chromatid cohesion protein 2 (SCC2, A1243), cell division cycle protein 20 (CDC20, A1114), cell division control protein 6 (CDC6, A2948), and other cell-cycle-regulating genes. In the ribosome pathway (Figure S15), genes encoded 49 ribosomal proteins showed down-regulated expressions during the period of MY to PR, which was contrary to previous reports [61,64]. This result revealed that the ribosome pathway might have a great impact on cell differentiation and development in F. luteovirens. In the MAPK signaling pathways (Figure S16), the up-regulated expression genes were identified which related to pheromone-dependent and starvation-dependent MAPK signaling pathways, including genes encoding Ste20, Ste7, Ptp2, Cla4, Hog1, Sko1, Hsl7, Ypd1, and Pak1.
DEGs involved in the primary carbohydrate metabolism pathway were also identified, such as the glycolysis pathway (ko00010) and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (ko00020), in the reproductive growth of F. luteovirens. Most of the genes involved in the glycolysis pathway showed increased expression (Figure S17). In this pathway, the genes encoding glucose-6-phosphate 1-epimerase (A1707), aldehyde dehydrogenase (A4115), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (A0195), pyruvate kinase (A1513), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (A4589), and hexokinase (A5086) showed up-regulation in the fruiting process. However, the gene encoding alcohol dehydrogenase (A0550) showed down-regulation.
Ultimately, we identified the key genes in three DEG libraries which were reported to play a vital role in fruiting body formation in the previous studies [63,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. As presented in Figure 6B, the gene encoding serine-threonine-rich membrane-anchored protein (A1206) was found to be significantly up-expressed in primordia and fruiting body. This result was consistent with literature reports [74]. Moreover, exg1 (A3431) [65], priB (A5902) [63], arp9 (A5507) [67], OAT (A6245, A6624) [69], ras (A1380) [71], and the genes involved in the mTOR signaling pathway (A0126, A6478) [70] showed up-expression in the fruiting process. Meanwhile, snf5 (A4977, A0667) [67], NOX (A1150, A1482) [66] and pro1 (A6150, A6149) [68] were found to be significantly down-expressed during the vegetative-to-reproductive transition stage.
At the end, quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to validate the results of RNA-seq. The expression levels of 28 genes of interest (Table S13) were analyzed by RT-qPCR and the results were basically consistent with the findings of RNA-seq (Figure 7B). In general, the findings of this study indicated that the fruiting process of F. luteovirens was regulated by a number of genes involved in various metabolic processes, especially for serine-threonine-rich membrane-anchored protein (Figure 7A).

4. Discussion

Our research team has been focusing on F. luteovirens research for 11 years [3]. The unique growth environment and growth characteristics of F. luteovirens have brought high research thresholds to researchers. The mycelia of F. luteovirens grow slowly even in the optimized cultivation temperature of 23 °C [8]. Considering the medicinal and functional value of F. luteovirens, we had developed the submerged cultivation conditions for improved exopolysaccharides (EPS) production by F. luteovirens [8]. We also optimized the variables of the biotransformation process in order to enhance betulinic acid production from betulin catalyzed by the cultured cells of F. luteovirens [75]. However, the genomic background and developmental biology of this fungus were rarely reported. Herein, we report a 27 Mb draft genome sequence of F. luteovirens C10. The genome information would be a useful tool to investigate this rare edible fungus. Compared to the genomes of other edible fungi, F. luteovirens had a small genomic size [13,76,77,78,79,80]. The genomic features of F. luteovirens had its own unique characteristics. There were 672 genes associated with the cell metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides accounting for the largest proportion, which indicates that F. luteovirens was a potential resource species for terpenoids and polyketides. Likewise, 257 genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism which also accounted for a large proportion could be the reason for F. luteovirens being rich in polysaccharides [8]. Meanwhile, F. luteovirens was an ectomycorrhizal fungus, resulting in less genes associated with lignocellulose degradation than white-rot fungus and brown-rot fungus [12], such as Lentinula edodes [81], Ganoderma lucidum [45], and Antrodia cinnamomea [46].
In addition to the genes involved in the biosynthesis of triterpenoids and polysaccharides, F. luteovirens had 16 putative gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of NRPs, PKs, and terpenes, including a melleolides BGC with 100% similarity. Melleolides were reported as natural products with more than 70 described members [82]. Previously, melleolides were isolated from Armillaria mellea in the beginning [83,84,85]. With the development of research, more derivatives were found [54,82,86,87,88]. The polyketide derivatives of melleolides were composed of an orsellinic acid (OA) moiety esterified to various sesquiterpene alcohols mediates mediated by non-reducing polyketide synthase [56]. According to previous studies, the first step in melleolides biosynthesis is performed by the delta6-protoilludene synthase PRO1 which catalyzes the cyclization of farnesyl diphosphate to protoilludane. The orsellinic acid synthase armB produces OA by condensing acetyl-CoA with 3 malonyl-CoA units in a three-round chain elongation reaction followed by a C2-C7 ring closure [56]. ArmB further catalyzes the trans-esterification of OA to the various sesquiterpene alcohols resulting from the hydroxylation of protoilludene [55,56]. The melleolides cluster in genus Armillaria fungi includes 5 cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, 4 NAD+-dependent oxidoreductases, one flavin-dependent oxidoreductase, and one O-methyltransferase (By similarity). The cytochrome P450 monooxygenases may be involved in protoilludene hydroxylation to elaborate melleolides with multiple alcohol groups, such as melleolide D, which carries alcohol functionalities at C-4, C-5, C-10, and C-13 (By similarity). The role of NAD+-dependent enzymes remains unknown (By similarity). Numerous melleolides, including arnamial, show 5′-O-methylation of the aromatic moiety which may be catalyzed by the methyltransferase encoded in the cluster (By similarity). The flavin-dependent oxidoreductase might represent the dehydrogenase yielding the aldehyde in position 1 of arnamial and other melleolides (By similarity). Finally, several halogenases localized outside of the cluster (armH1 to armH5), are able to catalyze the transfer of a single chlorine atom to the melleolide backbone, resulting in a 6′-chloromelleolide product [55]. However, unlike reported in previous studies, armH4 gene was found inside the melleolides BGC of F. luteovirens in addition to the genes of cytochrome P450 enzyme and armB. Meanwhile, the delta6-protoilludene synthase PRO1 gene was found to localize outside of the cluster and present as a multicopy gene in the genome of F. luteovirens which differed from the genus Armillaria fungi. In this study, melleolides compounds derived from F. luteovirens were also identified. Melleolides were natural products with various bioactivities including anti-inflammation, antibacterial, antifungal, phytotoxic activity, and cytotoxicity against cancer cells [51,52,53,54,57,58,89]. The isolation of melleolides compounds from F. luteovirens suggested that F. luteovirens may be used as a potential biosynthesis resource.
Although melleolides BGC were found both in the genome of F. luteovirens and Armillaria mellea, they had no obvious phylogenetic relationships that were noteworthy [9,12,90]. Taking the growing environment, for instance, Armillaria mellea is able to be distributed around the world [90] while F. luteovirens is a regional fungus. Armillaria mellea was a root rot fungus and a symbiotic strain with Gastrodia elata [91,92], while F. luteovirens was an ectomycorrhizal and fairy ring-forming fungus [12]. Unfortunately, the genome sequence of Armillaria mellea has not yet been published, and we are unable to investigate why F. luteovirens had the same melleolides BGC as Armillaria mellea did. As to phylogenetic analysis of F. luteovirens C10, with the results of NR annotation, phylogenetic trees, and synteny analysis, we considered that F. luteovirens was supposed to belong to the genus of Floccularia instead of Armillaria as it used to. It is noteworthy that the Armillaria luteovirens species in the Taxonomy Browser database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy, accessed on 17 August 2019) was replaced by F. luteovirens (NCBI: txid493452) which belonged to Tricholomataceae. This approach was consistent with the results of the present study.
Moreover, we used comparative transcriptome analysis to identify candidate genes related to F. luteovirens fruiting body formation with high-throughput RNA-seq. In this work, six genes associated with GO terms related to the developmental process, reproduction, and reproductive process were identified and differentially expressed during the fruiting body formation process. Moreover, some transcription factors were found to be differentially expressed during the fruiting body formation period, especially the MADS-box genes. In addition, KEGG pathways were reported that are associated with fruiting body formation in previous studies [61,64,93]. Thus, we performed KEGG pathway analysis and found that the genes involved in the cell cycle (ko04111), ribosome (ko03010), MAPK signaling (ko04011), and primary carbohydrate metabolism (ko00010) pathways differentially expressed significantly during reproductive growth. Furthermore, previous studies had reported that some genes played a critical role in fruiting body formation [62,66,67,69,70,94,95,96]. Miyazaki et al. [63] found that the priB gene was up-regulated during fruiting body development in Lentinula edodes. Nakazawa et al. [67] reported that Cc.snf5 was shown to cause defects in fruiting initiation in the agaricomycete Coprinopsis cinerea. In addition, Hsu et al. [73] underlined that cytochrome p450 genes were strongly expressed during fruiting body formation in Antrodia cinnamomea. Accordingly, we identified the key genes in three DEG libraries and found that the experimental findings were consistent with the above reports.
In summary, the elucidation of the F. luteovirens genome and transcriptome sequences would provide insights into this precious macrofungus. The genome information can be further used for comparative genomic studies with other mushroom species to unravel the evolution and growth characteristics of F. luteovirens which would help us to develop a strategy for artificial cultivation of F. luteovirens. Further, the biosynthesis of the pharmacologically active compounds produced by this medicinal fungus could be strategically exploited. Therefore, the comprehensive understanding of the F. luteovirens genome will pave the way for its future roles in the food industry, pharmacological, and mushroom industrial applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7110887/s1, Figure S1: The morphology of the fruiting body and hyphae of F. luteovirens, Figure S2: Histogram of read length distribution after filtering, Figure S3: Histogram of read score distribution after filtering, Figure S4: Association analysis statistics of GC content and sequencing depth of F. luteovirens C10 genome data, Figure S5: BUSCO analysis, Figure S6: Gene length distribution statistics, Figure S7: 93 tRNA predictions using tRNA Scan-SE, Figure S8: The melleolide-biosynthetic in F. luteovirens, Figure S9: HPLC analysis of C10 submerged-culture organic extract, Figure S10: Top30 matched species with NR annotation, Figure S11: Agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA extracted from samples, Figure S12: Gene expression map, Figure S13: The correlation between each two samples based on TPM result, Figure S14: The vegetative-to-reproductive transition stage related pathway—Cell cycle, Figure S15: The vegetative-to-reproductive transition stage related pathway—Ribosome, Figure S16: The vegetative-to-reproductive transition stage related pathway—Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway, Figure S17: The reproductive growth stage related pathway—Glycolysis, Table S1: Primer sets used for quantitative real-time PCR, Table S2: Statistical result of interspersed nuclear elements, Table S3: Statistical result of tandem repeats, Table S4: Statistical result of non-coding RNA, Table S5: Genomic features of F. luteovirens and other 5 selected medicinal fungi, Table S6: Functional Annotation results, Table S7: Classification of putative carbohydrate metabolism proteins of Floccularia luteovirens and other edible fungi or model fungi based on CaZy database, Table S8: Statistical result of P450 genes, Table S9: Transporters in F. luteovirens, Table S10: Putative gene clusters coding for secondary metabolites in F. luteovirens C10, Table S11: Taxonomic status of F. luteovirens, Table S12: Statistics of transcriptome sequencing data, Table S13: Genes validated by RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

Q.C. planned the study; Z.L. and H.L. collected the samples; Z.L. and X.Z. analyzed the experimental data; Z.L. drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR13C200002) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31871904).

Acknowledgments

Yachen Dong and Peng Li are thanked for their helpful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xing, R.; Gao, Q.B.; Zhang, F.Q.; Fu, P.C.; Wang, J.L.; Yan, H.Y.; Chen, S.L. Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships of the ectomycorrhizal Floccularia luteovirens on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, C.; Shao, Y.; Tao, Y.; Wen, H. Optimization of dynamic microwave-assisted extraction of Armillaria polysaccharides using RSM, and their biological activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiao, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H. Improvement of exo-polysaccharides production and modeling kinetics by Armillaria luteo-virens Sacc. in submerged cultivation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1694–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, K.; Liu, Q.H.; Ng, T.B.; Liu, H.Z.; Li, J.Q.; Chen, G.; Sheng, H.Y.; Xie, Z.L.; Wang, H.X. Isolation and characterization of a novel lectin from the mushroom Armillaria luteo-virens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 345, 1573–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jiao, L.; Tao, Y.; Wang, W.; Mei, L.; Shao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Dang, J. Chemical Constituents of Fruit Body of Armillaria luteo-virens. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2019, 55, 373–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, L.J.; Chen, Q.J.; Wang, H.X.; Zhang, G.Q. Purification and characterization of a ribonuclease from the wild edible mushroom Armillaria luteo-virens. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 50, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiong, H.Y.; Fei, D.Q.; Zhou, J.S.; Yang, C.J.; Ma, G.L. Steroids and other constituents from the mushroom Armillaria lueo-virens. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2009, 45, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, D.; Fu, M.; Chen, Q.; Liu, J. Effect of submerged culture conditions on exopolysaccharides production by Armillaria luteo-virens Sacc QH and kinetic modeling. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 34, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xing, R.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.; Fu, P.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Khan, G.; Chen, S. Genetic diversity and population structure of Armillaria luteovirens (Physalacriaceae) in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau revealed by SSR markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014, 56, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, L.; Cao, M.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Wan, J.; Wang, R.; Zhou, H.; Wang, W.; Xu, J. The volatile organic compounds of Floccularia luteovirens modulate plant growth and metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 2020, 456, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dang, J.; Chen, C.; Ma, J.; Dawa, Y.; Wang, Q.; Tao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ji, T. Preparative isolation of highly polar free radical inhibitor from Floccularia luteovirens using hydrophilic interaction chromatography directed by on-line HPLC-DPPH assay. J. Chromatogr. B 2020, 1142, 122043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xing, R.; Yan, H.Y.; Gao, Q.B.; Zhang, F.Q.; Wang, J.L.; Chen, S.L. Microbial communities inhabiting the fairy ring of Floccularia luteovirens and isolation of potential mycorrhiza helper bacteria. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yap, H.Y.; Chooi, Y.H.; Firdaus-Raih, M.; Fung, S.Y.; Ng, S.T.; Tan, C.S.; Tan, N.H. The genome of the Tiger Milk mushroom, Lignosus rhinocerotis, provides insights into the genetic basis of its medicinal properties. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ardui, S.; Ameur, A.; Vermeesch, J.R.; Hestand, M.S. Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing comes of age: Applications and utilities for medical diagnostics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Reiner, J.; Pisani, L.; Qiao, W.; Singh, R.; Yang, Y.; Shi, L.; Khan, W.A.; Sebra, R.; Cohen, N.; Babu, A.; et al. Cytogenomic identification and long-read single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing of a Bardet–Biedl Syndrome 9 (BBS9) deletion. NPJ Genom. Med. 2018, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Trapnell, C.; Pachter, L.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stanke, M.; Diekhans, M.; Baertsch, R.; Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Saha, S.; Bridges, S.; Magbanua, Z.V.; Peterson, D.G. Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 2284–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lagesen, K.; Hallin, P.; Rodland, E.A.; Staerfeldt, H.H.; Rognes, T.; Ussery, D.W. RNAmmer: Consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3100–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gardner, P.P.; Daub, J.; Tate, J.G.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Kolbe, D.L.; Lindgreen, S.; Wilkinson, A.C.; Finn, R.D.; Griffiths-Jones, S.; Eddy, S.R.; et al. Rfam: Updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D136–D140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Hattori, M.; Aoki-Kinoshita, K.F.; Itoh, M.; Kawashima, S.; Katayama, T.; Araki, M.; Hirakawa, M. From genomics to chemical genomics: New developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D354–D357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Kawashima, S.; Okuno, Y.; Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D277–D280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Galperin, M.Y.; Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Koonin, E.V. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D261–D269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, W.; Jaroszewski, L.; Godzik, A. Tolerating some redundancy significantly speeds up clustering of large protein databases. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moktali, V.; Park, J.; Fedorova-Abrams, N.D.; Park, B.; Choi, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Kang, S. Systematic and searchable classification of cytochrome P450 proteins encoded by fungal and oomycete genomes. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Bairoch, A.; Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Petersen, T.N.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 785–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Steinke, K.; Villebro, R.; Ziemert, N.; Lee, S.Y.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 5.0: Updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W81–W87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, H.; Yohe, T.; Huang, L.; Entwistle, S.; Wu, P.; Yang, Z.; Busk, P.K.; Xu, Y.; Yin, Y. dbCAN2: A meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W95–W101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981, 17, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Nix, D.A.; Eisen, M.B. GATA: A graphic alignment tool for comparative sequence analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2005, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Xie, C.; Mao, X.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.Y.; Wei, L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W316–W322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ye, J.; Coulouris, G.; Zaretskaya, I.; Cutcutache, I.; Rozen, S.; Madden, T.L. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Gan, X.; Cao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, S.; Wei, L.; Li, S.; Liu, B. Draft Genome Assembly of Floccularia luteovirens, an Edible and Symbiotic Mushroom on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. G3-Genes Genomes Genet. 2020, 10, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Chen, J.; Zeng, X.; Yang, Y.L.; Xing, Y.M.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.M.; Ma, K.; Liu, H.W.; Guo, S.X. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal differential regulation of diverse terpenoid and polyketides secondary metabolites in Hericium erinaceus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chen, S.; Xu, J.; Liu, C.; Zhu, Y.; Nelson, D.R.; Zhou, S.; Li, C.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Sun, Y.; et al. Genome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lu, M.Y.; Fan, W.L.; Wang, W.F.; Chen, T.; Tang, Y.C.; Chu, F.H.; Chang, T.T.; Wang, S.Y.; Li, M.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the medicinal fungus Antrodia cinnamomea for its metabolite biosynthesis and sexual development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4743–E4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Črešnar, B.; Petrič, Š. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in the fungal kingdom. BBA-Proteins Proteom. 2011, 1814, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nelson, D.R. The cytochrome p450 homepage. Hum. Genom. 2009, 4, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Platta, H.W.; Erdmann, R. The peroxisomal protein import machinery. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2811–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Holmes, T.C.; May, A.E.; Zaleta-Rivera, K.; Ruby, J.G.; Skewes-Cox, P.; Fischbach, M.A.; DeRisi, J.L.; Iwatsuki, M.; Omura, S.; Khosla, C. Molecular insights into the biosynthesis of guadinomine: A type III secretion system inhibitor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17797–17806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Konig, S.; Romp, E.; Krauth, V.; Ruhl, M.; Dorfer, M.; Liening, S.; Hofmann, B.; Hafner, A.K.; Steinhilber, D.; Karas, M.; et al. Melleolides from Honey Mushroom Inhibit 5-Lipoxygenase via Cys159. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 60–70.e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bohnert, M.; Scherer, O.; Wiechmann, K.; Konig, S.; Dahse, H.M.; Hoffmeister, D.; Werz, O. Melleolides induce rapid cell death in human primary monocytes and cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 3856–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Momose, I.; Sekizawa, R.; Hosokawa, N.; Iinuma, H.; Matsui, S.; Nakamura, H.; Naganawa, H.; Hamada, M.; Takeuchi, T. Melleolides K, L and M, new melleolides from Armillariella mellea. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhelifonova, V.P.; Antipova, T.V.; Litvinova, E.A.; Baskunov, B.P.; Litovka, Y.A.; Pavlov, I.N.; Kozlovsky, A.G. Biosynthesis of Protoilludene Sesquiterpene Aryl Esters by Siberian Strains of the Genus Armillaria Fungi. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2019, 55, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wick, J.; Heine, D.; Lackner, G.; Misiek, M.; Tauber, J.; Jagusch, H.; Hertweck, C.; Hoffmeister, D. A fivefold parallelized biosynthetic process secures chlorination of Armillaria mellea (honey mushroom) toxins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lackner, G.; Bohnert, M.; Wick, J.; Hoffmeister, D. Assembly of melleolide antibiotics involves a polyketide synthase with cross-coupling activity. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Dörfer, M.; Heine, D.; König, S.; Gore, S.; Werz, O.; Hertweck, C.; Gressler, M.; Hoffmeister, D. Melleolides impact fungal translation: Via elongation factor 2. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 4906–4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bohnert, M.; Nützmann, H.W.; Schroeckh, V.; Horn, F.; Dahse, H.M.; Brakhage, A.A.; Hoffmeister, D. Cytotoxic and antifungal activities of melleolide antibiotics follow dissimilar structure-activity relationships. Phytochemistry 2014, 105, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Chen, B.; Mukhtar, I.; Xie, B.; Li, Z.; Meng, L. Characterization and expression pattern of homeobox transcription factors in fruiting body development of straw mushroom Volvariella volvacea. Fungal Biol. 2019, 123, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Vonk, P.J.; Ohm, R.A. The role of homeodomain transcription factors in fungal development. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2018, 32, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Fu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Yang, C.; Wei, P.; Song, B.; Yang, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Li, Y. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Identified Candidate Genes Related to Bailinggu Mushroom Formation and Genetic Markers for Genetic Analyses and Breeding. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kamada, T.; Sano, H.; Nakazawa, T.; Nakahori, K. Regulation of fruiting body photomorphogenesis in Coprinopsis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Miyazaki, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Babasaki, K. Molecular cloning of developmentally specific genes by representational difference analysis during the fruiting body formation in the basidiomycete Lentinula edodes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cheng, C.K.; Au, C.H.; Wilke, S.K.; Stajich, J.E.; Zolan, M.E.; Pukkila, P.J.; Kwan, H.S. 5′-Serial Analysis of Gene Expression studies reveal a transcriptomic switch during fruiting body development in Coprinopsis cinerea. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Sakamoto, Y.; Irie, T.; Sato, T. Isolation and characterization of a fruiting body-specific exo-beta-1,3-glucanase-encoding gene, exg1, from Lentinula edodes. Curr. Genet. 2005, 47, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mu, D.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Shi, L.; Ren, A.; Zhao, M. Functions of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase family in G anoderma lucidum: An essential role in ganoderic acid biosynthesis regulation, hyphal branching, fruiting body development, and oxidative--stress resistance. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1709–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nakazawa, T.; Ando, Y.; Hata, T.; Nakahori, K. A mutation in the Cc.arp9 gene encoding a putative actin-related protein causes defects in fruiting initiation and asexual development in the agaricomycete Coprinopsis cinerea. Curr. Genet. 2016, 62, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Masloff, S.; Jacobsen, S.; Poggeler, S.; Kuck, U. Functional analysis of the C6 zinc finger gene pro1 involved in fungal sexual development. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2002, 36, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wagemaker, M.J.; Eastwood, D.C.; Welagen, J.; van der Drift, C.; Jetten, M.S.; Burton, K.; Van Griensven, L.J.; den Camp, H.J.O. The role of ornithine aminotransferase in fruiting body formation of the mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, J.; Ren, A.; Chen, H.; Zhao, M.; Shi, L.; Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Feng, Z. Transcriptome analysis and its application in identifying genes associated with fruiting body development in basidiomycete Hypsizygus marmoreus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Palmer, G.E.; Horton, J.S. Mushrooms by magic: Making connections between signal transduction and fruiting body development in the basidiomycete fungus Schizophyllum commune. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 262, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chu, Y.-C.; Yang, R.-M.; Chang, T.-T.; Chou, J.-C. Fructification of Antrodia cinnamomea Was Strain Dependent in Malt Extract Media and Involved Specific Gene Expression. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hsu, K.-H.; Lee, Y.-R.; Lin, Y.-L.; Chu, F.-H. Cytochrome P450 Genes in Medicinal Mushroom Antrodia cinnamomea T.T. Chang et W.N. Chou (Higher Basidiomycetes) are Strongly Expressed during Fruiting Body Formation. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2011, 13, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Szeto, C.Y.; Leung, G.S.; Kwan, H.S. Le. MAPK and its interacting partner, Le.DRMIP, in fruiting body development in Lentinula edodes. Gene 2007, 393, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, J.; Fu, M.L.; Chen, Q.H. Biotransformation optimization of betulin into betulinic acid production catalysed by cultured Armillaria luteo-virens Sacc ZJUQH100-6 cells. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shim, D.; Park, S.G.; Kim, K.; Bae, W.; Lee, G.W.; Ha, B.S.; Ro, H.S.; Kim, M.; Ryoo, R.; Rhee, S.K.; et al. Whole genome de novo sequencing and genome annotation of the world popular cultivated edible mushroom, Lentinula edodes. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 223, 24–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, H.; Wu, S.; Ma, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Duan, S.; Gao, Y.; Kui, L.; Huang, W.; Wu, P.; et al. The Genome Sequences of 90 Mushrooms. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Park, Y.J.; Baek, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, C.; Rhee, H.; Kim, H.; Seo, J.S.; Park, H.R.; Yoon, D.E.; Nam, J.Y.; et al. Whole genome and global gene expression analyses of the model mushroom Flammulina velutipes reveal a high capacity for lignocellulose degradation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, P.; Tang, X.; He, X.; Mi, F.; Liu, C.; Yang, D.; Xu, J. Genome Sequence of Phlebopus portentosus Strain PP33, a Cultivated Bolete. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e00326-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zheng, P.; Xia, Y.; Xiao, G.; Xiong, C.; Hu, X.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Genome sequence of the insect pathogenic fungus Cordyceps militaris, a valued traditional Chinese medicine. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Chen, L.; Gong, Y.; Cai, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lei, X.; Wang, G.; et al. Genome Sequence of the Edible Cultivated Mushroom Lentinula edodes (Shiitake) Reveals Insights into Lignocellulose Degradation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dörfer, M.; Gressler, M.; Hoffmeister, D. Diversity and bioactivity of Armillaria sesquiterpene aryl ester natural products. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Donnelly, D.M.X.; Hutchinson, R.M.; Coveney, D.; Yonemitsu, M. Sesquiterpene aryl esters from Armillaria mellea. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 2569–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Arnone, A.; Cardillo, R.; Nasini, G.; Meille, S.V. Secondary mould metabolites. Part 19. Structure elucidation and absolute configuration of melledonals B and C, novel antibacterial sesquiterpenoids from Armillaria mellea. X-ray molecular structure of melledonal C. J. Chem. Soc.-Perkin Trans. 1988, 1, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Arnone, A.; Cardillo, R.; Nasini, G. Structures of melleolides B-D, three antibacterial sesquiterpenoids from Armillaria mellea. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Midland, S.L.; Izac, R.R.; Wing, R.M.; Zaki, A.I.; Munnecke, D.E.; Sims, J.J. Melleolide, a New Antibiotic from Armillaria-Mellea. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 2515–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Engels, B.; Heinig, U.; Grothe, T.; Stadler, M.; Jennewein, S. Cloning and characterization of an Armillaria gallica cDNA encoding protoilludene synthase, which catalyzes the first committed step in the synthesis of antimicrobial melleolides. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 6871–6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Donnelly, D.M.X.; Konishi, T.; Dunne, O.; Cremin, P. Sesquiterpene aryl esters from Armillaria tabescens. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bohnert, M.; Miethbauer, S.; Dahse, H.M.; Ziemen, J.; Nett, M.; Hoffmeister, D. In vitro cytotoxicity of melleolide antibiotics: Structural and mechanistic aspects. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 2003–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Coetzee, M.P.A.; Wingfield, B.D.; Harrington, T.C.; Dalevi, D.; Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, M.J. Geographical diversity of Armillaria mellea s. s. based on phylogenetic analysis. Mycologia 2019, 92, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Muszynska, B.; Sulkowska-Ziaja, K.; Wolkowska, M.; Ekiert, H. Chemical, Pharmacological, and Biological Characterization of the Culinary-Medicinal Honey Mushroom, Armillaria mellea (Vahl) P. Kumm. (Agaricomycetideae): A Review. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2011, 13, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cha, J.Y.; Igarashi, T. Armillaria species associated with Gastrodia elata in Japan. For. Pathol. 1995, 25, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chum, W.W.; Kwan, H.S.; Au, C.H.; Kwok, I.S.; Fung, Y.W. Cataloging and profiling genes expressed in Lentinula edodes fruiting body by massive cDNA pyrosequencing and LongSAGE. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ohm, R.A.; de Jong, J.F.; Lugones, L.G.; Aerts, A.; Kothe, E.; Stajich, J.E.; de Vries, R.P.; Record, E.; Levasseur, A.; Baker, S.E.; et al. Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Kuratani, M.; Tanaka, K.; Terashima, K.; Muraguchi, H.; Nakazawa, T.; Nakahori, K.; Kamada, T. The dst2 gene essential for photomorphogenesis of Coprinopsis cinerea encodes a protein with a putative FAD-binding-4 domain. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Boulianne, R.P.; Liu, Y.; Aebi, M.; Lu, B.C.; Kues, U. Fruiting body development in Coprinus cinereus: Regulated expression of two galectins secreted by a non-classical pathway. Microbiology 2000, 146 Pt 8, 1841–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jof 07 00887 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of F. luteovirens genomic features. (Circles I in A,B) Circular representation of the pseudomolecule (Length > 0.08 Mb). (Circles II–IV in A,B) gene density (30 kb window), percentage of repeats (30 kb window), and GC content (30 kb window). (Circle V in A) Each linking line in the center of the circle connects a pair of homologous genes. (Circle V in B) Genome duplication: regions sharing more than 90% sequence similarity over 1 kb are connected by grey lines; those with more than 90% similarity over 5 kb are connected by orange lines.
Figure 1. Distribution of F. luteovirens genomic features. (Circles I in A,B) Circular representation of the pseudomolecule (Length > 0.08 Mb). (Circles II–IV in A,B) gene density (30 kb window), percentage of repeats (30 kb window), and GC content (30 kb window). (Circle V in A) Each linking line in the center of the circle connects a pair of homologous genes. (Circle V in B) Genome duplication: regions sharing more than 90% sequence similarity over 1 kb are connected by grey lines; those with more than 90% similarity over 5 kb are connected by orange lines.
Jof 07 00887 g001
Jof 07 00887 g002 550
Figure 2. Gene function annotation of F. luteovirens C10 genome. (A) GO enrichment analysis of annotated genes exist in C10. (B) KEGG pathway annotation of the genome of C10. (C) Annotation of C10 by CAZy databases. (D) KOG function classification of annotated genes in C10. Distribution of predicted proteins from F. luteovirens genome according to functional class by Eukaryotic Clusters of Orthologs (KOG) database.
Figure 2. Gene function annotation of F. luteovirens C10 genome. (A) GO enrichment analysis of annotated genes exist in C10. (B) KEGG pathway annotation of the genome of C10. (C) Annotation of C10 by CAZy databases. (D) KOG function classification of annotated genes in C10. Distribution of predicted proteins from F. luteovirens genome according to functional class by Eukaryotic Clusters of Orthologs (KOG) database.
Jof 07 00887 g002
Jof 07 00887 g003 550
Figure 3. The classification of cytochrome p450, BGCs and transporters of the F. luteovirens C10 genome. (A) Cytochrome p450 classification. (B) The composition of BGCs of C10. (C,D) Transporter function classification.
Figure 3. The classification of cytochrome p450, BGCs and transporters of the F. luteovirens C10 genome. (A) Cytochrome p450 classification. (B) The composition of BGCs of C10. (C,D) Transporter function classification.
Jof 07 00887 g003
Jof 07 00887 g004 550
Figure 4. Representative secondary metabolites and biosynthesis pathways of melleolides of Floccularia luteovirens.
Figure 4. Representative secondary metabolites and biosynthesis pathways of melleolides of Floccularia luteovirens.
Jof 07 00887 g004
Jof 07 00887 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of F. luteovirens C10 based on the ITS and LSU sequences and whole genome synteny analysis of F. luteovirens C10 with Armillaria gallica, Hypsizygus marmoreus and Lepista sordida. (A) Phylogenetic tree derived from the ITS sequence analysis of strain C10 and related fungi from the result of NR annotation; (B) phylogenetic tree derived from the ITS sequence analysis of strain C10 and selected fungi belonging to family Tricholomataceae; (C) phylogenetic tree of strain C10 and selected fungi belonging to family Lyophyllaceae; (D) phylogenetic tree of C10 strain and selected fungi belonging to families Tricholomataceae and Lyophyllaceae. Calocera viscosa was used as the outgroup. (E) Armillaria gallica vs. C10; (F) Hypsizygus marmoreus vs. C10; (G) Lepista sordida vs. C10. Red represent F. luteovirens C10. Black lines link syntenic genes.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of F. luteovirens C10 based on the ITS and LSU sequences and whole genome synteny analysis of F. luteovirens C10 with Armillaria gallica, Hypsizygus marmoreus and Lepista sordida. (A) Phylogenetic tree derived from the ITS sequence analysis of strain C10 and related fungi from the result of NR annotation; (B) phylogenetic tree derived from the ITS sequence analysis of strain C10 and selected fungi belonging to family Tricholomataceae; (C) phylogenetic tree of strain C10 and selected fungi belonging to family Lyophyllaceae; (D) phylogenetic tree of C10 strain and selected fungi belonging to families Tricholomataceae and Lyophyllaceae. Calocera viscosa was used as the outgroup. (E) Armillaria gallica vs. C10; (F) Hypsizygus marmoreus vs. C10; (G) Lepista sordida vs. C10. Red represent F. luteovirens C10. Black lines link syntenic genes.
Jof 07 00887 g005
Jof 07 00887 g006 550
Figure 6. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during F. luteovirens development. (A) Venn diagrams depicting the genes expressed across the different developmental stages. (B) Heatmap of differential gene expression associated with fruiting formation in F. luteovirens. (C–F) The typical developmental stages in the life cycle of F. luteovirens were illustrated. (C) The vegetative mycelia formed a fluffy white layer on top of the PDA plates. (D) Aerial hyphae interacted with each other to form primordia. (E,F) These primordia further differentiated into fruiting bodies. Enrichment analysis showed that particular functional terms were over-represented in genes that were up- or down-regulated during a developmental transition.
Figure 6. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during F. luteovirens development. (A) Venn diagrams depicting the genes expressed across the different developmental stages. (B) Heatmap of differential gene expression associated with fruiting formation in F. luteovirens. (C–F) The typical developmental stages in the life cycle of F. luteovirens were illustrated. (C) The vegetative mycelia formed a fluffy white layer on top of the PDA plates. (D) Aerial hyphae interacted with each other to form primordia. (E,F) These primordia further differentiated into fruiting bodies. Enrichment analysis showed that particular functional terms were over-represented in genes that were up- or down-regulated during a developmental transition.
Jof 07 00887 g006
Jof 07 00887 g007 550
Figure 7. The candidate genes and pathways related to fruiting body formation. (A) The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and related pathways during fruiting body formation. (B) Comparison of qRT-PCR and RNA-seq results of 28 genes of interest during the period of MY to PR.
Figure 7. The candidate genes and pathways related to fruiting body formation. (A) The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and related pathways during fruiting body formation. (B) Comparison of qRT-PCR and RNA-seq results of 28 genes of interest during the period of MY to PR.
Jof 07 00887 g007
Table
Table 1. Overview of genomic features of F. luteovirens C10.
Table 1. Overview of genomic features of F. luteovirens C10.
AttributeValue
Assembly summary
No. of contigs23
Length of the largest contig (bp)3,288,420
Length of the smallest contig (bp)15,938
N50 length (bp)2,275,160
N90 length (bp)1,237,025
Percentage of assembly (%)
Contigs ≥ 500 bp100%
Contigs ≥ 1 kb100%
BUSCO analysis (%)
Complete (%)89.3
Complete duplicated (%)0.3
Fragmented (%)3.8
Missing (%)6.9
Genomic component analysis
Genome size (bp)27,003,024
GC content of genome43.54%
Gene number7068
Gene length11,273,474
Average gene length (bp)1595
% of genome (genes)41.75%
GC content of protein-coding genes (%)34.93%
Average protein length (aa)531
Length of largest protein-coding gene, bp4023
Length of smallest protein-coding gene, bp66
Average no. of exons per gene7
Average exon size (bp)219
Average no. of introns per gene6
Average intron size (bp)68
Average size of intergenic regions (bp)2225
Gene internal length15,729,880
Number of tRNAs93
Number of rRNAs7
Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters (BGCs)16
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Lu, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q. The Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Floccularia luteovirens, a Rare Edible Fungus in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Provide Insights into the Taxonomy Placement and Fruiting Body Formation. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110887

AMA Style

Liu Z, Lu H, Zhang X, Chen Q. The Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Floccularia luteovirens, a Rare Edible Fungus in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Provide Insights into the Taxonomy Placement and Fruiting Body Formation. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(11):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhengjie, Hongyun Lu, Xinglin Zhang, and Qihe Chen. 2021. "The Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Floccularia luteovirens, a Rare Edible Fungus in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Provide Insights into the Taxonomy Placement and Fruiting Body Formation" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 11: 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110887

APA Style

Liu, Z., Lu, H., Zhang, X., & Chen, Q. (2021). The Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Floccularia luteovirens, a Rare Edible Fungus in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Provide Insights into the Taxonomy Placement and Fruiting Body Formation. Journal of Fungi, 7(11), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7110887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop