Next Article in Journal
White-Nose Syndrome Confirmed in Italy: A Preliminary Assessment of Its Occurrence in Bat Species
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of the Antidepressant Function of the Edible Mushroom Pleurotus eryngii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Melanoleuca galbuserae, M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata—Three New Species in Subgenus Urticocystis (Pluteaceae, Basidiomycota) with Comments on M. castaneofusca and Related Species

by
Vladimír Antonín
1,*,
Hana Ševčíková
1,
Roberto Para
2,
Ondrej Ďuriška
3,
Tomáš Kudláček
4 and
Michal Tomšovský
4
1
Department of Botany, Moravian Museum, Zelný trh 6, CZ-659 37 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Via Martiri di via Fani 22, I-61024 Mombaroccio, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, Odbojárov 10, SK-832 32 Bratislava, Slovakia
4
Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(3), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030191
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 4 March 2021 / Accepted: 4 March 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Evolution, Biodiversity and Systematics)

Abstract

:
Melanoleuca is one of the taxonomically most complicated genera of Agaricomycetes with several taxonomically lineages. The subgenus Urticocystis of the genus Melanoleuca contains species with either urticoid or absent cheilocystidia. In this paper, three new European species, Melanoleuca galbuserae, Melanoleuca fontenlae, and Melanoleuca acystidiata are described as new to science. Melanoleuca galbuserae, related to Melanoleuca stepposa and Melanoleuca tristis, was discovered in alpine grasslands in North Italy. The type specimens and recent collections of Melanoleuca angelesiana, Melanoleuca castaneofusca, Melanoleuca luteolosperma, Melanoleuca pseudopaedida, and Melanoleuca robertiana were sequenced and morphologically examined. Moreover, the related Melanoleuca microcephala and Melanoleuca paedida were included in morphological examination and DNA sequence analyses. All the species were delimited by macro- and micromorphological characters and the multigene phylogenetic analyses of a combined (ITS, rpb2, and tef1) dataset on the basis of the species tree estimation. In accordance with new molecular and morphological data, we suggest taxonomic reappraisal of M. pseudopaedida and M. robertiana, and M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata are proposed as new species. The differences between the type material of M. angelesiana from the USA and European M. angelesiana specimens are discussed.

1. Introduction

Melanoleuca Pat. is an agaric genus with about 420 validly published names (http://www.indexfungorum.org, accessed on 26 April 2020) and around 60 species accepted worldwide [1]. This genus is taxonomically extremely complicated because of the overlapping macro- and micromorphological characters among the most of species (e.g., [2,3]). Recently, two subgenera were phylogenetically confirmed, subgen. Melanoleuca with well-developed macrocystidia, and subgen. Urticocystis Boekhout with either urticoid or absent cheilocystidia [4]. Section Cognatae with macrocystidia represents the only one exception in subgen. Urticocystis [4].
This study represents a continuation of papers dealing with European taxa of Melanoleuca subgen. Urticocystis [2,3,5]. During mycological field excursions within the “43° Comitato Scientifico Provinciale” held in Solda (Sulden), Bolzano—South Tyrol, Italy, in July 2018, and organized by the Bolzano group of the Associazione Micologica Bresadola, basidiomata of remarkable Melanoleuca were found in the alpine grassland with a dwarf willow (Salix herbacea). According to its macro- and micromorphological characters and the molecular data, it belongs to subgen. Urticocystis and represents a new species described here.
Melanoleuca castaneofusca Contu is a lesser-known species from Sardinia, Italy. The species has been known only from the type locality, but according to our records, it is distributed across several European countries. Melanoleuca castaneofusca is related to Melanoleuca luteolosperma (Britzelm.) Singer, Melanoleuca microcephala (P. Karst.) Singer, and Melanoleuca paedida (Fr.) Kühner & Maire. The subject of this paper is detailed taxonomical revision of these species including available type collections and recent specimens. The study is based on a macro- and micromorphological examination and a multigene phylogeny of both recent and type specimens. The information about ecology and distribution of all studied species are summarized here.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Dataset

Macroscopic descriptions, on the basis of fresh basidiomata, were made by the authors or collectors. Color abbreviations follow Kornerup and Wanscher [6], Munsell [7], and Küppers [8]; herbarium abbreviations follow Thiers [9]. Authors of fungal names are cited according to the Authors of Fungal Names page (http://www.indexfungorum.org/AuthorsOfFungalNames.htm, accessed on 5 February 2021). The so-called finger test is used for the character of the pileus surface [10]. A positive test means that the finger leaves a clear imprint on the pileus surface. The caulohymenium, formed in particular on the stipe apex surface in some Melanoleuca species, is a layer composed of caulobasidioles, caulocystidia, and sporulating caulobasidia. It is comparable with the hymenium of the hymenophore in many respects [11]. Microscopic features were described from dried material mounted in KOH, Melzer’s reagent, and Congo Red, using an Olympus BX-50 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan), Leica DM 1000 (Wetzlar, Germany), and Olympus BX41 with a magnification of 1000×. The SEM microphotograph of basidiospores was taken using a Tescan Mira 3 LMU electron microscope (Brno, Czech Republic). For basidiospores, the factors E (quotient of length and width in any one spore) and Q (mean of E-values) were used. Characters of cheilocystidia are defined according to Vizzini et al. [4] and Boekhout [12]. The notation [a/b/c] at the beginning of micromorphological data means (a) structures were measured from (b) basidiomata taken from (c) collections.

2.2. Molecular Dataset

DNA from dried fungal material was isolated, and DNA of 3 genes (ITS region of ribosomal RNA gene = ITS; translation elongation factor 1-alpha = tef1; RNA polymerase II, the second largest subunit = rpb2) was amplified in accordance with the work of Antonín et al. [2,3]. In the case of older type specimens, the genus-specific primers for the Melanoleuca-targeting ITS2 region (MELITS2F/MELITS2R) developed by Antonín et al. [2] were applied for amplification. The 2 datasets were the subject of phylogenetic analyses. The ITS-only dataset contained of all specimens including the type specimens, whereas the combined multilocus ITS–tef1–rpb2 dataset contained selected representatives of each species. The sequences were aligned using MAFFT, version 7 online program, setting up the Q-INS-i option [13].
The datasets were enriched with sequences published by [2,3,4,5,14,15,16]. The aligned ITS dataset was 780 bp long (87 conserved, 74 variable, and 33 singleton positions, as determined in the MEGA X program version 10.1.8 [17]). The combined ITS–tef1–rpb2 dataset was 2748 bp long (1750 conserved, 959 variable, and 98 singleton positions). The DNA sequences of Melanoleuca friesii and Melanoleuca strictipes published by Ďuriška et al. [18] and Antonín et al. (in prep.) from the subgenus Melanoleuca were selected as the outgroup for both ITS only and multilocus datasets.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogeny for both datasets, multilocus (tef1, rpb2, and ITS) and ITS only, was inferred by means of the maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods.
Within the maximum likelihood analysis, we estimated best-fitting partitioning schemes and evolutionary models for each subset with PartitionFinder 2 [19] according to the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). For both datasets, the analysis was carried out for both linked and unlinked branch lengths and the results were exactly the same in the case of both datasets. The program was set to test the largest set of models possible, including models with base frequencies estimated using maximum likelihood (84 models in total, the option models = allx), and all possible partitioning schemes (the option search = all).
Phylogenetic inference estimated on the basis of the maximum likelihood method was produced in the RAxML-NG software [20]. The sufficient number of bootstrap replicates was determined automatically using the MRE-based bootstopping test [21] with the cutoff value 0.01 (the option—bs-cutoff 0.01). The maximum number of replicates was set to 5000 (the option—autoMRE{5000}). When the convergence was not reached, the analysis was run again for another 5000 bootstraps, both log files were concatenated, and the convergence was tested post hoc using the command bsconverge. We repeatedly added 5000 replicates until the convergence was reached. For the multilocus dataset, the bootstopping test converged after 6200 replicates. For the ITS only dataset, the convergence was not reached even after 30,000 for the cutoff value 0.01, but converged after 1700 trees for the cut-off value 0.03.
We calculated 2 support metrics: (1) Felsenstein’s bootstrap and (2) Transfer Bootstrap Expectation [22]. The latter better revealed support for some branches, and it is displayed in the final trees.
Bayesian inference was computed using the BEAST 2 software [23]. For the ITS only dataset, the analysis was carried out using the Standard template. For the multilocus dataset, the species tree inference was performed via the StarBEAST package [24]. Partitioning schemes selected by PartitionFinder2 (see above) were used as an input for both of these analyses. In both analyses, the site models were chosen automatically through the model averaging implemented in the bModelTest package [25]. The posterior estimates of the parameters were summarized with Tracer [26]. The quality of posterior estimates was evaluated on the basis of estimated sample size (ESS) value and visual analysis of the trace plots. In the case of the ITS only dataset, we used the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chain length of 50,000,000, which led to all parameters showing evidence of thorough sampling (ESS >> 1000). For the StarBEAST analysis, the number of MCMC generations resulting in sufficient sampling was much higher—we gradually increased the chain length to up to 400,000,000 when the ESS for all parameters was high enough. All estimates had ESS > 200, and the majority of them >> 1000. Both analyses were set up to sample both the tree and trace every 5000th state. Operators were always adjusted according to the program’s suggestions in the output of the previous run. As a consensus tree method, we opted for the maximum clade credibility tree and produced it using the TreeAnnotator program (a part of BEAST 2). Burn-in was set to 25% and the height of each node to the mean height across the entire sample of trees for that clade.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Dataset and Phylogeny

The phylograms resulted from both maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods had almost identical topologies. Within the Bayesian framework, convergence for both datasets was assessed on the basis of the visual assessment of the trace plot and the estimated sample size (ESS) of the posterior estimates of the parameters; in all cases, the value was higher than 200.
The specimens used in molecular analyses are summarized in Table 1. The phylogenetic analyses of both datasets (Figure 1 and Figure 2) resulted in independent and well supported positions of several Melanoleuca spp. insufficiently included in previous phylogenetic studies and one species new to science. We succeeded in ITS sequencing of type specimens of Melanoleuca angelesiana A.H. Sm., Melanoleuca castaneofusca, Melanoleuca luteolosperma, Melanoleuca pseudopaedida Bon, and Melanoleuca robertiana. The holotype of M. pseudopaedida is conspecific with M. luteolosperma, and therefore M. pseudopaedida in current concept [3] is described here as a new species, Melanoleuca fontenlae. Surprisingly, sequence of M. robertiana holotype fell among the subgenus Melanoleuca (species with macrocystidia), and therefore a taxonomic solution of this problem was proposed.

3.2. Taxonomy

Melanoleuca galbuserae Antonín, Ševčíková, Para & Tomšovský, sp. nov. (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Mycobank MB 838741.
Diagnosis. Melanoleuca stepposa differs by a dark brown or gray-brown context in the stipe base; a well-developed caulohymenium; and different sequences of ITS, tef1, and rpb2 genes.
Holotype. Italy, Alto Adige (South Tyrol), Solda, Rifugio Milano (Schaubachhütte), 46°29′26″ N, 10°35′58″ E, alt. ≈2630 m a.s.l. (above sea level), 29 July 2018 leg. A. Galbusera and H. Ševčíková (BRNM 825709, GenBank/EMBL: MW491332).
Etymology. Named according to the co-collector, Italian mycologist A. Galbusera.
Pileus 15–40 mm broad, ± applanate, usually with low obtuse umbo at center, depressed around it when mature, inflexed at margin, smooth, white or concolorous pruinose or almost glabrous (finger test positive or negative; [10]), whitish to light beige, ochre or pale brown, sometimes with light gray tinges (10YR8/1–2, 7/1–4), with darker center—dark yellow-brown, grayish brown, or dark brown (7.5YR4/2–4, 3/2; 10YR6/4–6/6, 5/3–6, 4/3–4, 3/4). Lamellae moderately close, L = ≈50–60, l = 2–3, emarginate and attached with tooth, sinuate, white, then dirty whitish (lighter than 10YR8/1), with uneven, concolorous edge. Stipe mostly (slightly) shorter that the pileus width, 15–25 × 2.5–5 mm, cylindrical, not or slightly clavate at base, longitudinally innately fibrillose, finely pruinose-pubescent only at apex, ochre to pale brown or gray-brown (10YR7/4–6, 6/6, 5/2–6); paler, whitish when young, at apex. Context white in the whole basidioma or only slightly grayish in the stipe base, with slight earthy smell.
Basidiospores [90/3/3] (7.2)7.5–9.5(10) × 5.0–6.5(7.0) μm, average = 8.5 × 5.7 μm, E = (1.23)1.30–1.75(1.84), Q = 1.50, (broadly) ellipsoid, less frequently ellipsoid–fusoid or obovate, ornamentation of small to moderately large warts and small, sometimes rare ridges, amyloid. Basidia [26/3/3] (28)31–39(42) × (9.5)10–13 μm, four-spored, clavate, or subfusoid. Basidioles (11)15–40 × (4.0)5.0–13 μm, clavate, subcylindrical, rarely subfusoid. Cheilocystidia [25/3/3] (length × base width × apex width) (26)32–47(55) × (5.0)6.0–8.0(12) × 2.5–4.0(6.0) μm, urticoid, of both brevipes- and exscissa-type, thin-walled, basal part clavate, fusoid, subcylindrical, sometimes irregular, apex subulate to conical, sometimes cylindrical, obtuse to subacute, rarely broadly obtuse, rarely metuloid. Pleurocystidia absent. Marginal cells 14–22 × 5.0–10 μm, cylindrical, clavate, often two-celled, sometimes irregular, thin-walled. Trama hyphae cylindrical to (sub)inflated, thin-walled, 3.0–12(20) μm, inamyloid. Pileipellis a (sub)trichoderm, of cylindrical, interwoven, up to 10 μm wide hyphae; terminal cells suberect to erect, rarely adpressed, cylindrical, clavate, fusoid, subutriform, thin-walled, obtuse, 3.0–12 μm wide. Stipitipellis a cutis, of cylindrical, slightly thick-walled, smooth or incrusted, 3.0–6.0 μm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia in (small) groups, 23–45(55) × 5.0–8.0(11) μm, cylindrical, narrowly clavate, fusoid, thin-walled. Clamp connections absent in all tissues.
Ecology. On soil in alpine grasslands with Salix herbacea.
Distribution. Thus far, M. galbuserae has been found only in three localities in North Italy, but its occurrence in neighboring alpine countries (Austria and Switzerland) is expected.
Additional specimens examined. Italy: South Tyrol, Solda, Refugio Madriccio (Madritschhütte), 46°29′48″ N, 10°36′48″ E, alt. ≈2820 m a.s.l., 29 July 2018 leg. J. Hrabáková (BRNM 825710).—Trentino, Pozza di Fassa, Passo delle Selle, 6 August 1994 leg. E. Bizio (MCVE 4505, as M. grammopodia).
Remarks. Melanoleuca galbuserae is characterized by rather small basidiomata, a light beige to dirty ochre-brown pileus with a darker center, white, then dirty whitish lamellae, a cylindrical, ochre to gray-brown stipe, mostly whitish context, (7.2)7.5–9.5(10) × 5.0–6.5(7.0) μm basidiospores, urticoid cheilocystidia of the brevipes- and exscissa-type, a pileipellis in the form of a (sub)trichoderm and simple caulocystidia (caulohymenium absent). It belongs to the M. exscissa (Fr.) Singer group [3].
For the phylogenetically related species, Melanoleuca stepposa Vacek has a pileus with more yellow tinges and a dark brown or gray-brown context in the stipe base, slightly narrower basidiospores (7.5–10 × 4.5–6.0(6.5) μm), and a well-developed caulohymenium [3]. Melanoleuca tristis M.M. Moser also differs by larger basidiomata (pileus 30–65 mm broad, stipe 22–55 × 3.5–7 mm), a dark brown pileus, grayish to gray lamellae, an uniformly dark gray-brown or black-brown to dirty dark brown stipe, dark brown context in the stipe base, larger (30–56 × 5.0–11 μm) cheilocystidia, and a well-developed caulohymenium [3]. Melanoleuca griseobrunnea Antonín, Ďuriška & Tomšovský has a gray-brown pileus, dirty cream-colored lamellae, slightly smaller basidiospores [7.0–9.0(9.5) × 5.0–6.0(6.5) μm], and a pileipellis in the form of a cutis [3]. Melanoleuca porphyropoda X.D. Yu has a centrally orange-cinnamon, otherwise light pinkish cinnamon to pinkish cinnamon pileus; a light purplish vinaceous stipe; and larger basidiospores (8.0–12.0 × 4.5–8.0 μm) [13]. Melanoleuca zaaminensis Kalamees differs by a dark yellowish brown, basally blackish brown stipe; a blackish brown context in the stipe base; and slightly smaller basidiospores [7.5–8.5(9.0) × 5.0–6.0 μm, average 8.1 × 5.6 μm] [3,27].

The Description of the Melanoleuca Castaneofusca Group

Melanoleuca fontenlae Para, Antonín, Ďuriška, Ševčíková & Tomšovský, sp. nov. (Figure 5). MycoBank MB 838743 = Melanoleuca pseudopaedida sensu Vizzini et al., 2011.
Diagnosis. Melanoleuca luteolosperma differs by slightly smaller basidiospores, (6.0)7.0–9.0 × (4.0)4.2–5.5(6.5) μm and by different sequences of ITS, tef1, and rpb2 genes.
Holotype. Italy, Emilia-Romagna Prov., Ravenna distr., Lido di Dante, 44°23′25″ N, 12°18′50″ E, 9 November 2000 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 772194, GenBank/EMBL: MW491326—ITS, MW488158—tef1, MW488173—rpb2).
Etymology. Named “fontenlae” in honor of the Italian mycologist Roberto Fontenla, a longtime collaborator of R. Para in Melanoleuca studies.
Pileus 9–39 mm broad, broadly conical, or almost applanate, with indistinct or distinct, broad, conical, obtuse umbo at center, inflexed at margin, hygrophanous, margin smooth when young, later sometimes shortly striate, not pruinose, whitish gray, gray-brown, dark brown (5B2, 6C4, 7D3, 7E6–7, 7F5–6, 8E4–5), pallescent up to ochraceous brown to brown (6C–D4–6, 7D5–6), margin paler than center in young specimens. Lamellae moderately close, L = c. 30–65, l = 2–3, emarginate and attached with tooth, ± horizontal, not intervenose, whitish or cream-colored, then pale ochraceous (4A3) or grayish, with beige reflex, with concolorous, ± smooth, finely pubescent edge. Stipe longer than pileus width, 17–60 × 1.5–7 mm, cylindrical, slightly broadened at apex, clavate (up to 5 mm broad) at base, finely floccose-pubescent, especially at apex, entirely longitudinally fibrillose, lustrous, whitish to slightly brownish at apex, ochraceous yellowish to brownish (6C–D3–4, 7D–C4, 7D5) at center, dark gray-brown (7E–F4, 7E–F6, 8E–F3), with white or whitish basal mycelium. Context whitish, slightly grayish brownish under pileipellis, hollow, fibrillose, brown to dark brown in stipe base, with indistinct or slightly fungoid (earthy) smell and mild taste.
Basidiospores [240/10/10] (6.0)6.5–10 × (4.0)4.8–6.0(6.5) μm, average = 8.0 × 5.6 μm, E = (1.1)1.21–1.6(1.73), Q = 1.42, (broadly) ellipsoid, verruculose, warts mostly irregularly shaped and sized, sometimes up to 0.75 μm high, sometimes with rare ridges, amyloid. Basidia [37/6/6] 24–50 × 7.0–13 μm, four-, rarely two-spored, clavate. Basidioles 15–40 × 5.0–12 μm, clavate, subcylindrical. Cheilocystidia [82/10/9] (length × base width × apex width) 19–65 × 3.0–10 × 2.5–3.5 μm, urticoid of the brevipes- and exscissa-type, sometimes very rare or absent, basal part clavate, subfusoid, often irregular, apical part subulate, obtuse, rarely with two septa, thin-walled, with crystals or not. Marginal cells 15–40 × 4.0–10 μm, clavate, ± cylindrical, subfusoid, irregular or branched, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia absent. Trama hyphae ± cylindrical, fusoid to inflated, thin-walled, inamyloid, up to 15 μm wide. Pileipellis an ixocutis transient to ixo(sub)trichoderm at center; terminal cells adpressed to erect, cylindrical, (sub)fusoid, subclavate, obtuse, thin-walled, inamyloid, up to 50 × 10 μm wide, grayish brown in KOH. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, ± slightly thick-walled, inamyloid, up to 6.0 μm wide hyphae. Caulohymenium of (1) single or in groups, 21–50 × 6.0–10 μm, clavate, fusoid to cylindrical, sometimes narrowly cylindrical, 30–40 × 2.5–3.0 μm, with apical incrustation, with or without one septum, and (2) urticoid cystidia, 25–70 × 3.0–10 μm, with apical crystals or not, thin-walled; caulocystidia sometimes scattered to absent. Clamp connections absent.
Ecology. Growing on sandy soil and dunes; found in grass, on a path, under Pinus pinaster, Pinus maritima, Pinus pinea, Quercus ilex, Pyracantha, and Rubus and under Salix and Pinus and under Juniperus communis
Distribution. Known only to be from France, Italy, and Slovakia until now.
Additional specimens examined. France: Bais de Somme, 7 December 1981 leg. Mrs. Bergeron, det. M. Bon (PC, Romagnesi 81.253, as M. rasilis var. pseudoluscina).—Italy: Emilia-Romagna Prov., Ravenna distr., Pineta di San Vitale, Bardello, 10 November 2000 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 825711).—Ibid., leg. M. Enderle (BRNM 825712).—Ibid., 9 November 2000 leg. V. Antonín and A. Hausknecht (BRNM 825713).—Ibid., Pineta Ramazzotti and Dunes di Lido di Dante, alt. –14 m a.s.l., 5 November 2007 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 825714). — Venezia, Caorle, Valle Vecchia‒Brussa, 20 December 2014 leg. E. Campo (BRNM 825715).—Slovakia: Cerová vrchovina, Vlčia dolina, 27 October 2002 leg. K. Skokanová (SAV F-3825, SAV F-3822).—Ibid., 27 October 2004 leg. S. Adamčík (SAV F-3823, SAV F-3824).
Remarks. Melanoleuca fontenlae is characterized by small basidiomata with a gray-brown pileus pallescent up to ochraceous brown, whitish, or cream-colored, then pale ochraceous or grayish lamellae, a slightly clavate, brownish to dark gray-brown stipe, a brown to dark brown context in the stipe base, urticoid, but sometimes rare or even missing cheilocystidia and mostly well-developed caulohymenium.
Melanoleuca fontenlae is identical with M. pseudopaedida sensu Vizzini et al. [3]. However, the type specimen of M. pseudopaedida, phylogenetically tallies to M. luteolosperma. Therefore, we consider M. pseudopaedida in the original sense as a synonymum of M. luteolosperma.
Among phylogenetically close species, only Melanoleuca luteolosperma has similarly small basidiomata. It differs by slightly smaller basidiospores, (6.0)7.0–9.0 × (4.0)4.2–5.5(6.5) μm, average 7.7 × 5.1 μm. Melanoleuca paedida differs by a larger, 30–60 mm broad, ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus; an only slightly darker context in the stipe base; and smaller basidiospores, 6.5–8.5 × 3.9–5.5 μm, average 7.3 × 5.1 μm; moreover, it constantly lacks a caulohymenium. Melanoleuca castaneofusca differs by larger basidiomata; a distinctly floccose to floccose-tomentose stipe at apex with an only brownish yellow tinged context in its base; and smaller basidiospores, 6.5–8.0 × 4.0–6.0 μm, average = 7.3 × 5.0 μm. Melanoleuca microcephala differs by a larger, (grayish) brown, beige-gray, or grayish pileus and consistently absent cheilocystidia and caulohymenium. Melanoleuca stridula (Fr.) Singer has a larger, 18–50 mm broad, rather dark (gray-)brown pileus; a distinctly bulbose stipe; slightly smaller basidiospores, 7.0–8.0(9.0) × 4.75–6.0 µm, average 7.9 × 5.4 µm; and consistently absent cheilocystidia and caulohymenium (our unpublished studies). The European collections of M. angelesiana have a larger, 25–80 mm broad pileus; an entirely floccose stipe with a pale context in its base; and constantly absent cheilocystidia and caulohymenium (our unpublished studies, see also notes above). Melanoleuca acystidiata has a brown pileus; a whitish, then light brown stipe; a white context in the stipe base; and a lack of cheilocystidia.
Melanoleuca robertiana Bon, Documents Mycologiques 20(79): 58, 1990.
Type revision (LIP 72092034, GenBank/EMBL: MW491341): Basidiospores 8.0–9.5(10) × 4.5–5.3 µm, average = 8.85 × 4.85 µm, E = 1.6–2.1, Q = 1.83, ellipsoid, oblong-ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, ornamentation of ± regular warts variable in size, ridges absent or very rare. Basidia 27–32 × 10–12 µm, four-spored, clavate or subfusoid. Basidioles 20–33 × 6.0–11 µm, clavate, subfusoid. Cheilocystidia 60–69 × 14–18 µm, fusoid or sublageniform, thin-walled with slightly thick-walled apex. Pleurocystidia absent. Trama hyphae cylindrical to ellipsoid, thin-walled, 5.0–15(20) µm wide, inamyloid. Pileipellis a cutis of cylindrical, thin-walled, 4.0–10 µm wide hyphae; terminal cells adpressed to suberect, cylindrical, obtuse, simple, rarely branched. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, 3.0–6.0 µm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia 28–41 × 7.0–12 µm, clavate, fusoid, subutriform, thin-walled; one macrocystidium seen, 44 × 13 µm. Clamp connections absent in all studied tissues.
Remarks. Bon [28] described Melanoleuca robertiana as an acystidiate taxon with basidiospores of (6.5)7–8.5(9) × (5)5.5–6(6.5) µm. The holotype was preserved in the Herbarium M. Bon, deposited in LIP (LIP 72092034). The majority of holotype material was not found in LIP, but a pocket with a small piece of holotype was glued to the original author’s sheet with a description of the holotype, consisting of roughly one-quarter of one small basidioma. Bon mentioned the absence of any cystidia and basidiospores of 6–7.5(8) × 5–6 µm on this description accompanying the holotype material. Macro- and microscopic characters of the Melanoleuca robertiana published in the literature [28,29] indicates the possibility this species belonging to the M. castaneofusca group. However, our holotype revision revealed the presence of 60–69 × 14–18 µm large cheilocystidia and basidiospores of 8.0–9.5(10) × 4.5–5.3 µm in size. The ITS sequencing of the holotype was successful, and ITS sequence agreed with that of macrocystidioid M. pallidicutis Bresinsky holotype (TAAM 178616, MT270846) [30] belonging to the subgenus Melanoleuca. The obvious disagreements between these features of the studied piece of the type material and the characters described in the original protologue of M. robertiana indicate that the original description and holotype specimen refer to two different taxa. It is almost certain that a mycologist as experienced as M. Bon described in the protologue a different collection than that which represents the type material of M. robertiana. In the literature, M. robertiana has always been considered an acystidiate species [4,10,31,32] (the last as synonym of M. melaleuca). We are convinced that the material was mistakenly confused and a wrong basidioma was deposited in the herbarium envelope. Melanoleuca pallidicutis is a taxon based on an unambiguous well-defined description and whose morphological characters in protologue match with that of the holotype and the DNA sequence supports its expected taxonomic position (Antonín et al. in prep.). On the basis of these facts, we considered the name Melanoleuca robertiana Bon a nomen confusum because there is a substantial conflict in crucial characters (the presence/absence and character of cystidia and spores size) between descriptions published in the protologue, other literature [10,28,29], and the type specimen.
Vizzini et al. [4] included, under the name M. robertiana, the sequence of a fungus collected in Italy and with macro- and microscopic agreement with the original description by Bon [28]. It is different from any other species of the Urticocystis Boekhout [2,3,4,5]. We decided to describe it as a new species here.
Melanoleuca acystidiata Para, Antonín, Ševčíková, Ďuriška & Tomšovský, sp. nov. Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Mycobank MB 838744
Diagnosis. It differs from M. microcephala by the pileus and stipe color and the white context in the stipe base, from M. paedida by the pileus color and slightly larger basidiospores (M. paedida 6.5–8.5 × 3.9–5.5 μm), and always absent cheilocystidia; from M. stridula by the pileus color and larger basidiospores (M. stridula 6.5–8(9) × 5–6 µm); and from M. fontenlae by the pileus and stipe color, white context in the stipe base, and absent cheilocystidia; all mentioned species also differ phylogenetically.
Holotype. Italy, South Tyrol, Bolzano Distr., St. Jacob in Val di Vizze, 46°54′03″ N, 11°28′14″ E, 1500 m a.s.l., numerous specimens on a grassy clearing of a Abies alba wood, 23 August 2007 leg. R. Para and R. Fontenla (ANC M0205, GenBank/EMBL: JN616462).
Etymology. Acystidiata—a species lacking cystidia.
Pileus 20–50 mm broad, from convex to irregularly flattened, with less distinct or absent umbo; margin inflexed; smooth, opaque, or silky-looking surface; hairless; slightly sticky when wet; finely velvety under lens; brown to dark brown (S60 Y70–99 M50, S80 Y10–99 M40) and sometimes almost black; sometimes paler or with ochre tinge (S50 Y40–50 M10, S40 Y 99 M20–40, S50 Y 99 M20–40); sometimes with discolored areas. Lamellae close, L = c. 60–70, l = 1–2 in between each lamella, emarginate, straight to slightly rounded, pure white to whitish or pale gray, sometimes darkening in age. Stipe usually (slightly) longer than pileus width, 30–70 × 2–7 mm, cylindrical, sometimes broadened at the base, surface glabrous, longitudinally fibrillose, sometimes twisted, in young basidiomata whitish, then light brown to brown with ochre tinge (S40 Y40–60 M10, S40 Y 99 M20–30), sometimes with indistinct whitish floccules. Context exiguous in the pileus; fibrous and tenacious in the stipe; white, whitish to light brown in the cortex; unchanging, with light herbaceous or fungoid smell and mild taste.
Basidiospores [96/3/3] (6.7)7.2–10(11) × 5–7.2(7.5) µm, average 8.2 × 6.1 µm, E = 1.19–1.64, E = 1.36; subglobose; broadly ellipsoid; ovoid; with ± large, regular, or irregular warts; ridges absent or rare; amyloid. Basidia [6/1/1] 29–37 × 11.5–13 µm, four-spored, clavate or subfusoid. Basidioles 12–35 × 5.0–13 µm, clavate, subcylindrical, subfusoid. Cheilocystidia and pleurocystidia not observed. Marginal cells 20–35 × 5.0–9.0 µm, clavate, (sub)cylindrical, mostly irregular, sometimes septate, thin-walled. Pileipellis acutis to ixocutis, consisting of cylindrical, thin-walled, up to 8.0 µm wide hyphae, inamyloid, smooth or with scattered simple to subcoralloid lateral projections; terminal cells adpressed to erect, cylindrical, narrowly fusoid or clavate, thin-walled, up to 10 µm wide; fusoid cystidioid elements rarely present. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, slightly thick-walled, up to 6.0 µm wide hyphae, inamyloid. Caulocystidia 22–40 × 7.0–12.5 µm, rare to frequent, in groups or isolated, clavate or cylindrical, sometimes rostrate. Clamp connections absent in all tissues.
Ecology. On soil in grass in montane spruce (Picea abies), fir (Abies alba), and larch (Larix decidua) stands on acidic soil of high elevation (≈1500–1900 m a.s.l.).
Distribution. Melanoleuca acystidiata has been found only in three montane localities in the north of Italy and Switzerland.
Additional specimens examined. Italy: Piemonte, Cuneo Distr., Bosco delle Navette di Ormea, alt. ≈1600 m a.s.l., 5 October 2015 leg. R Para and R. Fontenla (ANC M0233). — Switzerland: Davos, Schatzalp, alt. ≈1900 m, 25 June 2009 leg. J. Borovička (BRNM 772203).
Remarks. Melanoleuca acystidata is characterized by a more or less dark brown pileus; whitish lamellae; a stipe shorter or longer than the pileus width that is whitish when young, then light brown; a white context; subglobose; broadly ellipsoid or ovoid basidiospores, 7.2–9 × 6–7.2 µm in size; the absence of any hymenial cystidia; a pileipellis in the form of an (ixo)cutis with adpressed to erect terminal cells; and one type of clavate or cylindrical caulocystidia.
From the phylogenetically related species, M. microcephala differs by a (grayish) brown, beige-gray, grayish or uniformly grayish brown pileus, a gray-brown to dark gray-brown stipe, and a dark (reddish) brown to black-brown context in the stipe base. Melanoleuca paedida differs by an ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus, slightly smaller basidiospores, 6.5–8.5 × 3.9–5.5 μm, average 7.3 × 5.1 μm, and occasional cheilocystidia. Melanoleuca stridula has a uniformly rather dark, yellow-brown, (gray-)brown or dark brown pileus and smaller basidiospores, 6.5–8(9) × 5–6 µm, average 7.5 × 5.5 µm (our unpublished studies, [31,33,34]). Melanoleuca fontenlae has a whitish gray, gray-brown, dark brown pileus pallescent up to ochraceous brown or brown; an ochraceous yellowish to brownish, basally dark gray-brown stipe; a brown to dark brown context in the stipe base; and present cheilocystidia. The European collections of M. angelesiana have a larger, 25–80 mm broad, uniformly silvery gray, gray-brown, brown, dark brown, and centrally up to black-brown pileus and a more robust (45–80 × 4–10 mm), entirely floccose gray-brown stipe (our unpublished studies). The syntype of M. angelesiana, described from the Olympic Mts., Washington, USA, newly sequenced by us is more related to M. acystidiata Bon than to M. angelesiana identified by Vizzini et al. [4], but both species are clearly different. Among other species without cystidia, Melanoleuca brachyspora Harmaja differs by slightly smaller basidiospores, (6.5)7.0–9.0 × 4.5–6.5 μm, average = 7.5 × 5.5 μm. All above mentioned species also differ phylogenetically.
Melanoleuca castaneofusca Contu, Bulletin de la Fédération Mycologiques Dauphiné-Savoie 150: 41, 1998. Figure 8.
Holotype. Italy: Sardinia, Orto Botanico di Cagliari, 3 November 1992 leg. M. Contu (CAG 921103-01!).
Pileus 24–100 mm broad, broadly conical to almost applanate, without umbo or with slightly distinct, broad, obtuse umbo at center, slightly reflexed towards margin, pileus cuticle exceeding the pileus margin, sometimes undulate, hygrophanous or not, smooth, glabrous or finely fibrillose, with silvery appearance in some pilei, not striate, uniformly dark gray-brown to brown (5YR3/1–2, 4/2; 7.5YR3/2–4, 4/1–2; 10YR4/1–4), pale brown (S30Y60M30) with darker brown center, without or with watery brownish stains. Lamellae moderately close, L = 40–60, l = 1–3(4), emarginate and adnexed with tooth, sinuate, rather narrow, cream-colored with a beige reflex (7.5YR8, 10YR8/1), edge concolorous, finely pubescent. Stipe usually shorter than pileus width, 12–70 × 4–10 mm, cylindrical, slightly broadened at apex, tapering towards the base, slightly clavate to clavate-bulbose (up to 15 mm) at base, distinctly floccose to floccose-tomentose at apex, otherwise longitudinally fibrillose, brownish to gray-brown or dark brown (4/2; 7.5YR3/2, 4/2; 10YR4/2–4), whitish or slightly brownish tinged at base; basal tomentum whitish. Context with slight fungoid smell and mild fungoid taste, white in pileus, brown beneath the pileipellis, fibrillose, whitish in stipe and with brownish yellow or pale orange tinge in the stipe base, in stipe cortex grayish.
Basidiospores [100/4/4] (6.0)6.5–8.0 × 4.0–6.0 μm, average = 7.1 × 4.9 μm, E = (1.20)1.28–1.70(1.75), Q = 1.47, (broadly) ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, with a suprahilar depression, with verruculose ornamentation, verruculae ± rounded, up to 0.5 μm high, variable in size, connections very rare to absent, amyloid. Basidia [28/4/4] 18–40 × 6.0–12 μm, four-spored, clavate to subfusoid. Basidioles 15–38 × 5.0–12 μm, clavate, subcylindrical, subfusoid. Cheilocystidia (length × base width × apex width) [31/3/3] 18–55 × 5.0–11 × 3.0–5.0 μm, urticoid, of the brevipes- and also exscissa-type, basal part fusoid, lageniform or clavate, septate or not, sometimes irregular, thin-walled, apical part subulate, obtuse with or without crystaliferous cap. Marginal cells 16–35 × 5.0–9.0 μm, fusoid, clavate, lageniform, irregular to (sub)coralloid, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia often absent, sometimes scattered, 30–40 × 5–10 μm, of the brevipes-type, with or without septum and apical incrustation. Trama hyphae cylindrical to inflated, thin-walled, inamyloid, up to 15 μm wide. Pileipellis an ixocutis, composed of cylindrical, ± thin-walled, gelatinized, up to 8.0 μm wide, smooth hyphae; terminal cells adpressed to (sub)erect, cylindrical, narrowly clavate, obtuse, thin-walled, with gray-vacuolar pigmentation. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, slightly thick-walled, up to 6.0 μm wide hyphae with gray-brown pigmentation. Caulocystidia (caulohymenium) of two types, (1) urticoid cystidia of the exscissa- or brevipes-type, 25–60 × 4.0–9.0 μm, both septate and not septate, thin-walled, with indistinct to distinct apical incrustation, and (2) clavate, subfusoid, or subcylindrical cells, 18–50 × 7.0–12 μm, thin-walled; cystidia of the type (1) may be very rare or even absent. Clamp connections absent.
Ecology. On soil under Ulmus (BRNM 761900), in a greenhouse on a bare soil (BRNM 761901), on sandy soil under Picea (LIP RC86021), in a flowerpot with Mentha sp. in an urban apartment (SLO 1639), on composted soil in a cemetery [35], and on soil and shredded bark mulch in a botanic garden (K(M) 92562); holotype on basic sandy soil near Cactaceae in the botanic garden (CAG 921103-01). The species may be associated with commercial soil and compost substrates.
Distribution. This species is now confirmed from the Czech Republic, France, Great Britain (England), Italy, and Slovakia until now. However, we suppose it is more broadly distributed in similar habitats.
Specimens examined. Czech Republic: Osek near Hořovice, Vystrkov, 12 November 2012 leg. O. Jindřich (BRNM 761901).—France: Landrellec (Cotes du Nord), près Pleumeur-Boudon, 21 December 1986 leg. Reaudin, det. R. Courtecuisse (LIP RC86021, as M. brevipes).—Great Britain: England, Surrey, Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens, 9 October 2001 leg. A. Henrici (K(M) 92562, as M. turrita, a mixed collection with M. bataillei).—Italy: Sardinia, Orto Botanico di Cagliari, 3 November 1992 leg. M. Contu (CAG 921103-01, holotype).—Ravenna, Pineta di San Vitale, Casa vecchia, 8 November 2007 leg. M. Calderoni (BRNM 761900).—Slovakia: Podunajská nížina lowland, Bratislava, 28 October 2013 (SLO 1639).
Remarks. Melanoleuca castaneofusca, described from Sardinia [36], is characterized by rather robust basidiomata with a dark-colored pileus; cream lamellae; an apically distinctly floccose to floccose-tomentose, brownish to gray-brown stipe; whitish and brownish yellow tinged context in the stipe base; rather small basidiospores; urticoid cheilocystidia of the brevipes- and exscissa-type; a pileipellis in the form of an ixocutis; and well-developed caulohymenium. This species produces its basidiomata in late autumn in habitats strongly influenced by humans or at completely artificial places (e.g., greenhouse, cemetery, botanic garden). In recent literature, only one collection (Great Britain, Surrey, Morden Cemetery, October 2012 leg. T. Brown) was published [35]; it was identified on the basis of our sequences.
Among phylogenetically similar species, M. luteolosperma differs by smaller basidiomata (pileus 22–35 mm, stipe 50–55 × 3–4 mm), an ochraceous yellow or pale gray-brown stipe, and slightly larger basidiospores [7.0–9.0 × 5.0–5.5(6.0) μm]. Melanoleuca paedida differs by a smaller, 40–50 mm broad, ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus and lacks a caulohymenium. Melanoleuca fontenlae differs by smaller basidiomata (pileus 9–39 mm broad, stipe 17–60 mm long), only finely floccose-pubescent stipe, a brown to dark brown context in the stipe base, and larger basidiospores [(6.0)6.5–10 × (4.0)4.8–6.0(6.5) μm, average = 8.0 × 5.6 μm].
Melanoleuca malenconii Bon is macroscopically somewhat similar but differs by pale to grayish yellow lamellae when mature; a slightly pruinose-pubescent to distinctly floccose, sometimes especially in lower part floccose-hairy stipe that is rarely subglabrous at apex; the presence of pleurocystidia; longer basidiospores (up to 10 μm); and sometimes also by relatively smaller, paler basidiomata [2,28]. Melanoleuca humilis (Pers.) Pat. is morphologically similar species different in its grayish or beige lamellae in mature basidiomata, a (dark) brown context in the stipe base, longer basidiospores (up to 10 μm), and often also a smaller pileus [2].
Melanoleuca luteolosperma (Britzelm.) Singer, Cavanillesia 7: 127, 1935. Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Agaricus luteolospermus Britzelm., Bericht der Naturhist Vereins in Augsburg 31: 160, 1894. ‒ Tricholoma luteolospermum (Britzelm.) Lapl., Dictionnaire Iconographique des Champignons Supérieurs: 540, 1894.
Lectotype. Britzelmayr, Bericht der Naturhistorischen Vereins in Augsburg 31: Table 647, 1894 [37].
Epitype. Germany, vicinity of Augsburg, Wallenburg, Bergheim, Siebentischwald, Stadtberg n. Stätzling, Eurasburg, Peterhof, Wittelsbacher Park, 10 June 1962 leg. J. Stangl (M 0139486! [37]).
= Melanoleuca pseudoluscina Bon, Documents Mycologiques 10(37–38): 89, 1979.
Holotype. France, Somme, Quend les Pins, fourrés de l’Hyppophaeion et Koelerion, October 1963 leg. M. Bon (LIP 31018!).
Epitype. Italy, Venezia, Pineta Ca’ Savio di Cavallino-Treporti, 12 December 1999 leg. E. Bizio (ANC M0192).
= Melanoleuca pseudopaedida Bon, Documents Mycologiques 20(79): 58, 1990.
Holotype. France, Quend les Pins (Somme), Panne de dunes, Salix et Pinus, 5 November 1983 leg. M. Bon (LIP, Bon 831105!).
Pileus 22–42(62) mm broad, convex with obtuse center, almost without umbo or applanate, depressed at center, inflexed to straight at margin, smooth or finely pruinose, glabrous, never translucently striate, uniformly pale ochraceous gray to gray (5A2–5B3, 5C1–5D1), grayish brown (6D–E4) or brown (6D7) with whitish very margin. Lamellae moderately close, L = c. 40–60, l = 2–3, emarginate and attached with a tooth, ventricose, broad, white to pale cream-colored (2–3A2), with concolorous, uneven, finely pubescent edge. Stipe shorter or longer than pileus width, 20–55 × 3–7 mm, cylindrical, slightly broadened at apex, slightly broadened or attenuated and shortly radicating at base, finely longitudinally fibrillose, finely floccose-pubescent at apex, whitish at apex, pale ochraceous yellow (3A2) or pale gray-brown (±6C3) otherwise. Context whitish in pileus, whitish in stipe apex and (dark) brown (±6E4) in base, with indistinct smell and mild to bitterish taste.
Basidiospores [180/8/8] (6.0)7.0–9.0 × (4.0)4.2–5.5(6.5) μm, average 7.7 × 5.1 μm, E = (1.20)1.26–1.74(1.8), Q = 1.50, broadly ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, subovoid, verruculose, warts mostly irregular in shape and variable in size, up to 0.75 μm high, amyloid, ridges rare. Basidia [38/6/6] 26–46 × 8.0–12 μm, four-spored, clavate, subfusoid. Basidioles (12) 17–40 × 4.0–12 μm, clavate, subfusoid, cylindrical. Cheilocystidia [80/8/8] (length × base width × apex width) 22–66 × 3.0–10 × 3.0–4.5 μm, urticoid, of the exscissa- and brevipes-type, basal part clavate, subvesiculose, subfusoid, sometimes irregular, apex subulate or (sub)cylindrical, thin- to slightly thick-walled, muricate or not. Marginal cells 12–24 × (4.0)8.0–12 μm, clavate, vesiculose, sometimes two- or three-celled, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia absent. Trama hyphae cylindrical or subinflated, thin-walled, inamyloid, 3.0–15 μm wide. Pileipellis an (ixo)cutis, sometimes transient to subtrichoderm, composed of radially arranged, cylindrical, thin-walled, inamyloid, 3.0–8.0 μm wide hyphae; terminal cells often cystidioloid, adpressed to erect, cylindrical to clavate or fusoid, sometimes irregular to branched, thin-walled, obtuse, up to 8.0 μm wide, grayish brown in KOH. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, slightly thick-walled, inamyloid, 3.0–6.0 μm wide hyphae. Caulohymenium of (1) 16–70 × 2.0–11 μm, clavate, cylindrical, thin-walled, sometimes uniseptate cells; (2) urticoid cystidia, 24–64 × 4.0–10 μm, similar to cheilocystidia; and (3) caulobasidia, four-spored. Clamp connections absent.
Ecology. On soil, under Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica in a montane forest and on the riverbank under Populus, Sambucus, and Alnus (Slovakia), on the riverbank among grass, Dryas, and Picea (Slovenia, along the path in decaying remnants of grasses; under Juglans regia, Rosa, and Clematis (Italy); sandy soil under Populus (Italy); under Cistus (Italy); in a thermophilic forest stand (Czech Republic); and in a semi-dry grassland with Pinus (Germany).
Distribution. This species is widely distributed in Europe. Its occurrence is confirmed from the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, and Slovenia.
Specimens examined. Czech Republic: Bohemian Karst, Koda, 28 October 2009 leg. J. Burel and O. Jindřich (BRNM 817820).—France: Somme, Quend les Pins, thickets of Hyppophaeion and Koelerion, October 1963 leg. M. Bon (LIP 31018, holotype of M. pseudoluscina).—Quend les Pins (Somme), dunes, Salix and Pinus, 5 November 1983 leg. M. Bon (LIP, Bon 831105, holotype of M. pseudopaedida).—Germany: vicinity of Augsburg, Wallenburg, Bergheim, Siebentischwald, Stadtberg n. Stätzling, Eurasburg, Peterhof, Wittelsbacher Park, 10 June 1962 leg. J. Stangl (M 0139486, epitype).—Lahr-Sulz, Pinus, 20 June 1998 leg. G. Saar (BRNM 772190).—Italy: Calabria, Pollino National Park, Lungro, Piano di Campolungo, 8 October 2019 leg. H. Ševčíková (BRNM 826043).—Monti Sibillini,
Altino, 22 October 2010 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 817785).—Bibione, Faro, 8 December 2014 leg. E. Campo (817784).—Venezia, Pineta Ca’ Savio di Cavallino-Treporti, 12 December 1999 leg. E. Bizio (ANC M0192, epitype of M. pseudoluscina).—Ferrara, loc. Bosco Spada di Codigoro (FE), 14 November 2008 leg. G. Consiglio and A. Gennari (ANC M0194, as M. pseudoluscina).—Venezia, Giardini Ca’ Bianca, 14 November 1993 leg. E. Bizio (ANC M0191, as M. pseudoluscina).—Venezia, loc. Pineta Ca’ Savio di Cavallino-Treporti, 20 December 1998 leg. L. Levorato and C. Losi (ANC M193, as M. pseudoluscina).—Belluno, Caviola, Bosco Di Biasio di Falcade, 16 August 1996 leg. E. Bizio (ANC M0195, as M. pseudoluscina). — Slovakia: Velká Fatra Mts., Lubochňa, Lubochňanská dolina, Kundračka National Nature Reserve, alt. 820–1280 m a.s.l., 31 August 2002 leg. V. Kabát and V. Antonín (BRNM 761907).—Považský Inovec, Moravany nad Váhom, Výtoky, 29 September 2012 leg. I. Stach (SLO 1591).—Biele Karpaty, Skalka nad Váhom, near river Súčanka, 10 October 2013 leg. O. Ďuriška (SLO 1632).—Devínska Kobyla, Fialková dolina valley, 28 November 2019 leg. O. Ďuriška (SLO 2515).—Slovenia: Julians Alps, Triglav National Park, Zadnja Trenta, Upper Soča valley, alt. 980 m a.s.l., 10 October 2001 leg. G. Podgornik (BRNM 772201).
Remarks. Melanoleuca luteolosperma is an extremely variable species in terms of colors, characterized by rather small basidiomata with a uniformly pale ochraceous gray to gray or grayish brown pileus; pale cream lamellae; a cylindrical, basally slightly broadened or attenuated stipe that is finely floccose-pubescent only at apex and pale ochraceous yellow or pale gray brown; a pale brown context; moderately large basidiospores ((6.0)7.0–9.0 × (4.0)4.2–5.5(6.5) μm), varying from broadly ellipsoid (Q = 1.38) to ellipsoid (Q = 1.59); urticoid cheilocystidia of both the exscissa- and brevipes-type; a pileipellis often forming cystidioloid terminal cells; and mostly well-developed caulohymenium. The collection from Italy (Altino, BRNM 817785) differs by smaller basidiospores [6.5–7.5 × 4.5–5.5(6.0) μm].
Métrod [33] and Bon [10] considered M. luteolosperma a species with macrocystidia. However, Fontenla and Para [37] selected the epitype from the material collected in the original locality [38]. This epitype has urticoid cheilocystidia. M. luteolosperma was described as having a yellowish white spore print and whitish to yellowish basidiospores; its lamellae should be white when young, or whitish or brownish white [39]. The sequence of this epitype is identical to several recent collections with white, whitish, or only slightly cream lamellae. Therefore, we conclude that M. luteolosperma is a fungus with a broader variability of the lamellae color and with urticoid cystidia.
The sequence identified as M. pseudoluscina (JN616455) from Italy [4] was grouped among those of M. luteolosperma. Unfortunately, the sequencing of the holotype specimen of M. pseudoluscina failed. The holotype specimen (LIP 31018) is described as having a gray, often initially pale, then gray-brown or fuligineous and finaly black-gray (“atro-ardosiacus”) pileus, and a brown (“aerino-fuscus”) or fuligineo-gray (“fuligonoso-ardosiacus”) stipe [40]; microscopically, except for slightly different basidiospores [7.0–9.0(9.5) × 5.2–6.0(6.5) μm, average 8.1 × 5.7 μm], it agrees with the description of M. luteolosperma above. The holotype specimen of M. pseudopaedida is phylogenetically identical with M. luteolosperma, but different from M. pseudopaedida sensu Vizzini et al. [3], which is described as a new species M. fontenlae above.
Among phylogenetically close species, Melanoleuca castaneofusca differs by larger basidiomata, a darker dark gray-brown to brown pileus, a darker brownish to gray-brown or dark brown stipe, and slightly smaller basidiospores (6.5–8.0 × 4.0–6.0 μm). Melanoleuca paedida differs by a slightly larger, 30–60 mm broad, ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus; a stipe that is brownish, ochraceous orange, or concolorous with the pileus; slightly different basidiospores; and a lack of a caulohymenium. Melanoleuca fontenlae differs by a darker pileus and stipe and larger basidiospores [(6.0)6.5–10 × (4.0)4.8–6.0(6.5) μm, average = 8.0 × 5.6 μm].
The European collections of M. angelesiana A.H. Sm. are macroscopically similar to M. luteolosperma. It differs by larger basidiomata (pileus 25–80 mm, stipe 45–80 × 4–10 mm); a whitish context in the stipe base; larger basidiospores, 7.0–10 × (4.5)5.0–6.5(7.0) µm; and large basidia and basidioles (30–55 × 10–12 μm) (our unpublished studies). However, this species was originally described in North America, and the identity of European collections in terms of the work of Vizzini et al. [3] and American specimens is questionable.
Melanoleuca microcephala (P. Karst.) Singer, Cavanillesia 7: 123, 1935. Figure 12.
Tricholoma microcephalum P. Karst., Hedwigia 20 (12): 177, 1881.
Lectotype. Finland, Tavastia australis, Tammela, Mustiala, 26 August 1881 leg. et det. P.A. Karsten (H; Herbarium Petter Adolf Karsten, no. 1604, as Tricholoma microcephalus, designated here, MycoBank MBT 395959).
Pileus 18–60 mm broad; broadly low convex-conical; conical to applanate and centrally depressed with low, broad, and less distinct umbo; inflexed to involute at margin, with pileipellis slightly projecting beyond the margin; hygrophanous; sometimes slightly translucently striate at very margin; smooth, glabrous, or slightly aeriferous at margin; finger test + or 0; (grayish) brown (7–8F3–6, 6E–F4) at center; beige-gray or grayish (6B–E2–3, 6D3–4), otherwise uniformly grayish brown (6C–D–E4–5). Lamellae moderately close, L = c. 30–60, l = 2–4, emarginate and attached to shortly decurrent with tooth, sinuate when young, up to ≈5 mm broad, whitish to pale cream-colored with beige reflex, with concolorous, finely pubescent edge. Stipe usually longer than pileus width, 22–105 × 2–5.5 mm; cylindrical; clavate to subbulbose towards base (9–12 mm); slightly broadened at apex; finely pruinose or floccose, especially at apex; longitudinally fibrillose or almost fibrillose-squamulose; whitish to pale brownish at apex; pale yellowish with ochraceous tinge (near 4A3); gray-brown (6F2–5) to dark gray-brown towards base; fibrils often darker than ground color when moist—therefore, the stipe gives a mottled appearance; basal tomentum white. Context whitish in pileus, brownish under the pileipellis, fibrillose and pale to dark (reddish)brown (6–7F6) to black-brown in stipe base, brownish in stipe cortex, without smell or with a slight earthy smell and mild taste.
Basidiospores 7.0–9.5(10) × 5.0–7.0 μm, average = 8.3 × 5.8 μm, E = 1.21–1.67, Q = 1.42, broadly ellipsoid, ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, obovoid, thin- to slightly thick-walled, ornamentation verrucose, sometimes with rare ridges, warts variable in shape and size, round or irregular, close to moderately close, amyloid. Basidia 28–37 × 9.0–13 μm; four-, very rarely two-spored; clavate. Basidioles 12–35 × 5.0–13 μm, clavate, subcylindrical, subfusoid. Cheilo- and pleurocystidia observed. Marginal cells 17–28 × (3.5)5.0–11 μm, cylindrical, clavate, subfusoid, utriform, often irregular, thin-walled. Trama hyphae cylindrical to subinflated, thin-walled, inamyloid, 3.0–15 μm wide. Pileipellis an ixocutis (margin) to ixosubtrichoderm (centre), composed of radially arranged, ± cylindrical, thin-walled, up to 10 μm wide hyphae with often grayish to gray-brown pigmentation; terminal cells adpressed to (sub)erect, up to ≈50 × 3.0–10 μm, clavate, cylindrical, subfusoid, obtuse, thin-walled; pale grayish yellowish in KOH. Stipitipellis a cutis of cylindrical, parallel, ± slightly thick-walled, 3.0–6.0 μm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia in groups, 18–62 × 5.0–15 μm, cylindrical, clavate, subfusoid, thin-walled. Clamp connections absent.
Ecology. On soil in the montane and alpine belt, on a pasture with scattered Picea, in an alpine meadow, in mosses and vegetation along the montane stream, in grass in spruce forest, and along the forest path. It seems to be a montane calciphilous species.
Distribution. It is known from the montane and alpine belt on altitudes of ≈1500 m or more a.s.l. It is only confirmed from Finland (lectotype), Italy, and Slovakia until now.
Additional specimens examined. Italy: South Tyrol, Schlern-Rosengarten Naturpark (Sciliar-Catinaccio Nature Park), Tiers (Tires), alt. 1647 m a.s.l., 4 September 2013 leg. V. Antonín 13.212 (BRNM 817786). — South Tyrol, Prato Nuovo (Neuwies), Franzenshöhe, N 46°31′55″, E 010°28′46″, alt. 2150 m a.s.l., 30 July 2018 leg. B. Dima (BRNM 809300). — South Tyrol, Sulda (Solden), N 46°31′24″, E 010°35′17″, alt. 1864 m a.s.l., 31 July 2018 leg. J. Hrabáková (BRNM 817789). — South Tyrol, Franadega di Dobbiaco (BZ), alt. 1600 m a.s.l., 21 July 2005 leg. W. Tommasi (ANC M0196/JN616449 and herb. R. Para 050721-02, originally as M. stepposa). — Slovakia: Velká Fatra Mts., Ružomberok, Podsuchá part, Smrekovica, Skalná Alpa National Nature Reserve, alt. 1290–1320 m a.s.l., 23 September 2009 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 817787 and 761890). — Velká Fatra Mts., Ružomberok, Podsuchá part, Smrekovica, protecting belt of the Skalná Alpa National Nature Reserve, alt. 1300–1367 m a.s.l., 24 September 2009 leg. V. Antonín (BRNM 817788). — Belianske Tatry Mts., Tatranská Kotlina, Skalné vráta, alt. ≈1450–1950 m a.s.l., 5 September 2001 leg. I. Milan (BRNM 772196).
Remarks. Melanoleuca microcephala is characterized by moderately large basidiomata with a (grayish) brown, beige-gray, grayish, or uniformly grayish brown pileus; whitish to pale cream lamellae; a gray-brown to dark gray-brown stipe; a dark (reddish)brown to black-brown context in the stipe base and the absence of cheilo- and pleurocystidia and the absence of caulohymenium. Two cystidioid elements, 35–36 × 7.0–8.0 μm, on the lamellar edge were found only in the Italian collection (Italy, Tiers, BRNM 817786). However, they were not typically urticoid cells, but structures such as a transient form between cystidia and marginal cells. An atypical pale orangish yellow coloring of the stipe after touching appeared in the Slovak collection (Ružomberok, BRNM 817788). Caroti et al. [41] published a collection of M. microcephala with a small, 15–20 mm broad, dark brown pileus with a white outermost margin and scattered urticoid cheilo- and pleurocystidia. However, this collection was not confirmed by phylogenetic studies and its identity is unclear.
In comparison with phylogenetically similar species, Melanoleuca paedida differs by an ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus, a stipe of the same length or shorter than the pileus diameter, a slightly darker context in the stipe base, and slightly smaller basidiospores; the collection with cystidia as well as the acystidiate collection are known in this species. Melanoleuca stridula has a uniformly rather dark, yellow-brown, (gray-)brown, or dark brown pileus and smaller basidiospores, 6.5–8(9) × 5–6 µm, average 7.5 × 5.5 µm (our unpublished studies, [31,33,34]). Melanoleuca acystidiata has a dark brown pileus; a whitish, then light brown stipe; and a dark brown context in the stipe base. Among other species without cystidia, M. brachyspora Harmaja differs by a differently colored, brownish gray or brown to dark brown pileus; a white context in the stipe base; and slightly smaller basidiospores, (6.5)7.0–9.0 × 4.5–6.5 μm, average = 7.5 × 5.5 μm. The European collections of M. angelesiana differs by a whitish context in the stipe base and large basidia and basidioles (30–55 × 10–12 μm) (our unpublished studies, see also above).
Melanoleuca paedida (Fr.) Kühner & Maire, Bulletin trimestriel de la Société mycologique de France 50: 18, 1934. Figure 13.
Agaricus paedidus Fr., Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici: 53, 1838. ‒ Gyrophila paedida (Fr.) Quél., Enchiridion Fungorum: 18, 1886. ‒ Tricholoma paedidum (Fr.) Quél., Mémoires de la Société d’Émulation de Montbéliard, Série 2, 5: 341, 1873.
Neotype. Fries, Icones selectae Hymenomycetum nondum delineatorum, Table 46, Figure 1, 1867–1884 (designated here, MycoBank MBT 395960).
Pileus 30–60 mm broad, convex, soon flattened, then with depressed center, with absent or very reduced umbo and entire margin, glabrous (silky under lens, positive finger test), dry, opaque, ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown, with darker center. Lamellae moderately close to close, with numerous lamellulae of various lengths, emarginate and attached with tooth, high, straight, whitish or brownish gray, with concolorous edge. Stipe shorter than 30 × 6 mm or 60 × 4–8 mm, shorter or of the same length as the pileus width, cylindrical, enlarged or clavate at the base, with barely pruinose surface at the apex only, smooth or striate, brownish, ochraceous orange or concolorous with the pileus, with widespread white mycelial felt at the base. Context white or whitish, immutable, slightly darker in the stipe base, brownish also in the cortex of the stem and between the pileus and the lamellae, with pleasant herbaceous smell.
Basidiospores 6.5–8.5 × 3.9–5.5 μm, average 7.3 × 5.1 μm, E = 1.20–1.76, Q = 1.43, ellipsoid or subglobose, with small to medium sized, not close, amyloid warts. Basidia 26–40 × 9–10 μm, clavate, with long and narrow base, four- and two-spored. Cheilocystidia 50–74 × 5–10 μm, very numerous, urticoid. Pleurocystidia numerous, similar to cheilocystidia. Cheilo- and pleurocystidia may sometimes absent. Marginal cells 20–55 × 5–10 μm, scattered, clavate, twisted. Trama hyphae parallel, cylindrical. Pileipellis an ixocutis of interwoven hyphae, 3–4 µm wide, with a very thin gelatinous layer, with lemon-yellow intracellular pigment in superficial hyphae, yellowish-brown in underlying hyphae. Stipitipellis of parallel hyphae, with rare emerging hairs of variable shape. Caulocystidia absent. Clamp connections absent.
Ecology. On soil in Cedrus atlantica, Cedrus brevifolia, and Cedrus libani litter (Calabria) and in the grass under Pinus sp. (Lombardia).
Distribution. Recently confirmed only from Italy, but its distribution may be broader in Europe.
Specimens examined. Italy: Calabria, Colamauci di Celico (CS), alt. 1200 m a.s.l., 16 November 2009 leg. C. Lavorato (ANC M0189, JN616452). — Lombardia, lago Cancano di Valfurva (SO), alt. 1900 m a.s.l., 7 September 2001 leg. E. Carassai (herb. R. Para 010907-02).
Remarks. Melanoleuca paedida is characterized by an ochraceous fawn to pale or dark gray-brown pileus with darker center; whitish or brownish gray lamellae; a stipe shorter or of the same length as the pileus diameter; brownish, ochraceous orange, or concolorous with the pileus; a slightly darker context in the stipe base, moderately large, ellipsoid, or subglobose basidiospores; and lacking caulocystidia. Cheilo- and pleurocystidia are either present (ANC M0189) or absent (010907-02). The variability of the latter character requires further study. Therefore, the epitype is not proposed here. The identity of this species is based on the studies by Vizzini et al. [4].
Among phylogenetically similar species, Melanoleuca castaneofusca differs by a larger, uniformly dark gray-brown to brown pileus with watery brownish stains, brownish to gray-brown or dark brown stipe that is a distinctly floccose to floccose-tomentose at apex, constantly present cheilocystidia, and well-developed caulohymenium. Melanoleuca luteolosperma has a smaller, 22–35 mm broad pileus with a whitish very margin, a pale ochraceous yellow or pale gray-brown stipe, slightly smaller basidiospores, constantly present cheilocystidia, and a well-developed caulohymenium. Melanoleuca fontenlae differs by a brown to dark brown context in the stipe base and larger basidiospores [(6.0)6.5–10 × (4.0)4.8–6.0(6.5) μm, average = 8.0 × 5.6 μm], and it usually has a well-developed caulohymenium or at least caulocystidia. Melanoleuca stridula has a longer stipe than the pileus dimeter, slightly lager basidiospores [7.0–8.5(9.0) × 4.7–6.0 μm, average = 7.9 × 5.4 μm], constantly absent cheilocystidia, and a developed caulohymenium (our unpublished studies). Melanoleuca acystidiata differs by a dark brown pileus; a whitish, then light brown stipe; a white context in the stipe base; slightly larger basidiospores, 7.2–9 × 6–7.2 µm, average 8.6 × 6.3 µm; and always absent cheilocystidia.
European collections of M. angelesiana are also morphologically similar. They differ by a larger, 25–80 mm broad, uniformly silvery gray, gray-brown, brown, dark brown, and centrally up to black-brown pileus; a more robust (45–80 × 4–10 mm), gray-brown stipe; larger basidiospores [7.0–10 × (4.5)5.0–6.5(7.0) μm, average = 8.5 × 5.8 μm]; and consistently absent cheilocystidia and clavate caulocystidia.

4. Discussion

Melanoleuca is an example of an agaricomycete genus where molecular revision of type specimens is crucial for species concept and species recognition [42]. The several European Melanoleuca species proposed by Bon (e.g., [10,28]) were later synonymized [2–4] due to results of DNA sequence analyses. Although taxonomy of Melanoleuca in Europe has a long tradition, a new can be discovered here, e.g. Melanoleuca juliannae Rimóczi et al., was described recently [5]. Both recently described species M. galbuserae and M. juliannae share a preference for the specific grassland habitats (alpine grasslands or Pannonian sand grasslands), although their habitat preferences may be broader. Ecological differences can be found also among other species. Melanoleuca fontenlae prefers sandy soil and dunes, M. acystidiata and M. microcephala seem to be restricted to montane/alpine habitats, M. paedida prefers soils with coniferous litter, and M. luteolosperma occurs in a wide range of habitats. M. castaneofusca has been found in many habitats affected by human activity and may be dispersed by commercial substrates.
Melanoleuca is an extremely difficult genus for species identification due to overlapping morphological characters; the most useful distinguishing characters are noted here. The context color at the stipe base is the most important macroscopic characters in Melanoleuca—in the M. castaneofusca group, M. acystidiata and M. paedida have a white context, while M. fontenlae, M. microcephala, and M. luteolosperma differ by a darker context; M. castaneofusca has a whitish context with a brownish yellow or pale orange tinge. In the M. exscissa group, Melanoleuca galbuserae has a white to only slightly grayish context in the stipe base, which is similar to Melanoleuca exscissa and Melanoleuca rasilis; other European species (Melanoleuca diverticulata, Melanoleuca stepposa Vacek, and Melanoleuca tristis) have a dark-colored stipe base context [3]. The white stipe base context is also known in M. porphyropoda described from China, but has also been reported in the UK on the basis of their morphological features [16]. Melanoleuca galbuserae and M. porphyropoda seem to be related according to ITS data (Figure 1).
Moreover, caulohymenium [11] is a useful distinguishing character in MelanoleucaM. stepposa and M. tristis differ from M. galbuserae and M. griseobrunnea by the well-developed caulohymenium [3]. Such caulohymenium can be found also in M. castaneofusca, M. fontenlae, and M. luteolosperma.
Melanoleuca castaneofusca can be well distinguished also by a distinctly floccose to floccose-tomentose stipe apex and a pale-colored stipe; other related species (M. luteolosperma, M. paedida, M. fontenlae) have a darker-colored stipe with only a finely pruinose to pruinose-flocculose apex.
The basidiospore dimensions are crucial for identification in many agaricomycetes, but in Melanoleuca, this character may be confusing, because both, four- and two-spored basidia can occur in one hymenium and respective spores differ in their dimensions [43]. Melanoleuca paedida has both two- and four-spored basidia in the hymenium; only four-spored or only rare two-spored basidia were found in other species. Two species, M. microcephala and M. acystidiata, consistently lack cheilocystidia, but both cystidiate and acystidiate collections are known in M. paedida.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: V.A., M.T., H.Š.; field sampling: V.A., H.Š., R.P., O.Ď.; molecular data analysis: T.K., M.T.; taxonomic interpretation: V.A., H.Š., R.P., M.T.; writing: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research of V. Antonín and H. Ševčíková appears through the institutional support of long-term conceptual development of research institutions provided by the Ministry of Culture (Moravian Museum, ref. MK000094862). The research of Tomáš Kudláček and Michal Tomšovský was supported by the Czech Ministry for Education, Youth and Sports and the European Regional Development Fund for financing the Project Phytophthora Research Centre Reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000453.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 7 January 2021; https://www.mycobank.org, accessed on 7 January 2021.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the curators of the CAG, H, K, LIP, M, MCVE, PC, SAV, and SLO herbaria for loans of the type and other specimens. The authors wish to thank A. Galbusera (Italy) and J. Hrabáková (Czech Republic) for the collaboration in the field; E. Campo, E. Carassai, M. Contu, C. Lavorato, and W. Tommasi (Italy), B. Dima (Hungary), G. Podgornik (Slovenia), G. Saar and M. Enderle (Germany), S. Adamčík, I. Milan, K. Skokanová, and I. Stach (Slovakia) for sending or providing their collections; and O. Jindřich and J. Borovička (Czech Republic) for providing their collection and photos. The authors also thank L. A. Parra Sanchez (Aranda de Duero, Spain) for valuable nomenclatural comments. V. Antonín and H. Ševčíková thank F. Bellù and his colleagues (Italy) for the invitation to the congress in Solda. The authors also thank L. Ilkovics (Masaryk University, Medical Faculty, Department. of Histology and Embryology, Brno, Czech Republic) for providing the SEM microphotographs of the basidiospores. The authors also thank P.-A. Moreau (University Lille, France) for sending the type specimen of M. robertiana with valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. He, M.-Q.; Zhao, R.-L.; Hyde, K.D.; Begerow, D.; Kemler, M.; Yurkov, A.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Raspé, O.; Makishima, M.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; et al. Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 105–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Antonín, V.; Ďuriška, O.; Jančovičová, S.; Tomšovský, M. Identity of Agaricus brevipes Bull. (Melanoleuca brevipes, Tricholomataceae, Basidiomycota). Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Antonín, V.; Ďuriška, O.; Gafforov, Y.; Jančovičová, S.; Para, R.; Tomšovský, M. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy in Melanoleuca (Tricholomataceae, Basidiomycota) with emphasis on M. exscissa group and the description of M. griseobrunnea sp. nov. Plant Syst. Evol. 2017, 303, 1181–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vizzini, A.; Para, R.; Fontenla, R.; Ghignone, S.; Ercole, E. A preliminary ITS phylogeny of Melanoleuca (Agaricales) with special reference to European taxa. Mycotaxon 2011, 118, 361–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Antonín, V.; Rimóczi, I.; Benedek, L.; Papp, V.; Szarkándi, J.G.; Dima, B.; Nagy, L.G.; Papp, T.; Ďuriška, O.; Tomšovský, M. Melanoleuca juliannae (Basidiomycota, Tricholomataceae), a new species from subgen. Urticocystis Phytotaxa 2014, 170, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1983; pp. 1–252. [Google Scholar]
  7. Munsell, A.H. Munsell Soil Color Charts; Munsell Color: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  8. Küppers, H. DuMont Farbenatlas; Rasch: Bramsche, Germany, 2007; pp. 1–165. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available online: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (accessed on 10 January 2020).
  10. Bon, M. Les Tricholomes et ressemblant. Doc. Mycol. Mém. Hors Sér. 1991, 2, 1–163. [Google Scholar]
  11. Šutara, J. Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters. Czech Mycol. 2005, 57, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boekhout, T. Notulae ad floram agaricinam neerlandicam—XVI. New taxa, new combinations in Melanoleuca Pat. and notes on rare species in the Netherlands. Persoonia 1988, 13, 397–431. [Google Scholar]
  13. Katoh, K.; Toh, H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Osmundson, T.W.; Robert, V.A.; Schoch, C.L.; Baker, L.J.; Smith, A.; Robich, G.; Mizzan, L.; Garbelotto, M.M. Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: Contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA barcode sequencing project. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sánchez-García, M.; Cifuentes-Blanco, J.; Matheny, P.B. Revisión taxonómica del género Melanoleuca en México y descripción de especies nuevas. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2013, 84, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yu, X.-D.; Lv, S.-X.; Ma, D.; Li, F.-F.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, L. Two new species of Melanoleuca (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from northeastern China, supported by morphological and molecular data. Mycoscience 2014, 55, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ďuriška, O.; Antonín, V.; Para, R.; Tomšovský, M.; Jančovičová, S. Taxonomy, ecology and distribution of Melanoleuca strictipes (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) in Europe. Czech Mycol. 2017, 69, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.; Wright, A.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kozlov, A.; Darriba, D.; Flouri, T.; Morel, B.; Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4453–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Pattengale, N.; Alipour, M.; Bininda-Emonds, O.; Moret, B.; Stamatakis, A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J. Comput. Biol. 2010, 17, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lemoine, F.; Domelevo Entfellner, J.; Wilkinson, E.; Correia, D.; Dávila Felipe, M.; De Oliveira, T.; Gascuel, O. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 2018, 556, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bouckaert, R.; Heled, J.; Kühnert, D.; Vaughan, T.; Wu, C.; Xie, D.; Suchard, M.; Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A. BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Heled, J.; Drummond, A. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 27, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bouckaert, R.; Drummond, A. bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison. BMC Evol. Biol. 2017, 17, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kalamees, K. New and interesting agarics and boletes from East-Europe and Asia. Opera Bot. 1989, 100, 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bon, M. Novitates—Taxons nouveaux et validations. Doc. Mycol. 1990, 20, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fontenla, R.; Gottardi, M.; Para, R. Osservazioni sul genere Melanoleuca. Fungi Non Del. 2003, 25, 1–112. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bresinsky, A. Observations on mycobiota in Estonia. Folia Cryptog. Est. 2006, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fontenla, R.; Gottardi, M.; Para, R.; Contu, M. Osservazioni sul genere Melanoleuca. Sesto contributo: Neotipifizazione di Melanoleuca stridula, una specie friesiana di interpretazione univoca. Boll. Gruppo Micol. G. Bresadola N. Ser. 2003, 46, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vesterholt, J. Melanoleuca Pat. In Funga Nordica. Agaricoid, Boletoid, Clavarioid, Cyphelloid and Gasteroid Genera; Knudsen, H., Vesterholt, J., Eds.; Nordsvamp: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012; pp. 477–481. [Google Scholar]
  33. Métrod, G. Essai sur le genre Melanoleuca Patouillard emend. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 1948, 64, 141–165. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kühner, R. Agaricales de la zone alpine. Genre Melanoleuca Pat. Bull. Soc. Linnéenne Lyon 1978, 47, 12–52. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kibby, G. Melanoleuca castaneofusca new to Britain. Field Mycol. 2016, 17, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Contu, M. Une nouvelle espèce de Melanoleuca (Basidiomycota) de la Sardaigne, avec notes sur la taxonomie du genre. Bull. Féd. Mycol. Dauphiné Savoie 1998, 150, 41–43. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fontenla, R.; Para, R. Osservazioni sul genere Melanoleuca. Studio dei typi—II. Riv. Micol. 2008, 51, 147–162. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bresinsky, A.; Stangl, J. Beiträge zur Revision M. Britzelmayrs “Hymenomycetes aus Südbayern” 13. Die Gattung Melanoleuca unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Arten in der Umgebung von Augsburg. Z. Pilzk. 1977, 43, 145–173. [Google Scholar]
  39. Britzelmayr, M. Hymenomyceten aus Südbayern 13 (Theil X). Ber. Nat. Ver. Schwab. Neubg. 1894, 31, 157–222. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bon, M. Taxon nouveaux. Doc. Mycol. 1979, 10, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  41. Caroti, V.; Consiglio, G.; Contu, M.; Fontenla, R.; Gottardi, M.; Para, R. Contributo alla conosenza dei macromiceti dell’Emilia-Romagna. XXII. Genere. Melanoleuca. Boll. AMER 2006, 22, 9–39. [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor, J.W.; Jacobson, D.J.; Kroken, S.; Kasuga, T.; Geiser, D.M.; Hibbett, D.S.; Fisher, M.C. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2000, 31, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fontenla, R.; Gottardi, M.; La Rocca, S.; Para, R. Osservazioni sul genere Melanoleuca. La morfologia sporale. Riv. Micol. 2005, 48, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the ITS region of Melanoleuca species conducted by Bayesian analysis in BEAST 2 (for legends to numbers, see Table 1). Numbers at branches indicate maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability values. The asterisks (*) mark low support (<75 in maximum likelihood; <90 in Bayesian analysis). The bar indicates the number of expected substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the ITS region of Melanoleuca species conducted by Bayesian analysis in BEAST 2 (for legends to numbers, see Table 1). Numbers at branches indicate maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability values. The asterisks (*) mark low support (<75 in maximum likelihood; <90 in Bayesian analysis). The bar indicates the number of expected substitutions per site.
Jof 07 00191 g001
Figure 2. The species tree of ITS–tef1–rpb2 genes of Melanoleuca species conducted by multispecies coalescent analysis (for the legend to numbers, see Table 1). Numbers at branches indicate maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability values. The asterisks (*) mark low support (<75 in maximum likelihood; <90 in Bayesian analysis). The bar indicates the number of expected substitutions per site.
Figure 2. The species tree of ITS–tef1–rpb2 genes of Melanoleuca species conducted by multispecies coalescent analysis (for the legend to numbers, see Table 1). Numbers at branches indicate maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability values. The asterisks (*) mark low support (<75 in maximum likelihood; <90 in Bayesian analysis). The bar indicates the number of expected substitutions per site.
Jof 07 00191 g002
Figure 3. Melanoleuca galbuserae (holotype). SEM microphotographs of basidiospores. Photo L. Ilkovics.
Figure 3. Melanoleuca galbuserae (holotype). SEM microphotographs of basidiospores. Photo L. Ilkovics.
Jof 07 00191 g003
Figure 4. Melanoleuca galbuserae (holotype). Italy, Solda, Refugio Milano, 29 July 2018, photo H. Ševčíková.
Figure 4. Melanoleuca galbuserae (holotype). Italy, Solda, Refugio Milano, 29 July 2018, photo H. Ševčíková.
Jof 07 00191 g004
Figure 5. Melanoleuca fontenlae (BRNM 825714). Italy, Ravenna, Pineta Ramazzotti and Dunes di Lido di Dante, 5 November 2007, photo V. Antonín.
Figure 5. Melanoleuca fontenlae (BRNM 825714). Italy, Ravenna, Pineta Ramazzotti and Dunes di Lido di Dante, 5 November 2007, photo V. Antonín.
Jof 07 00191 g005
Figure 6. Melanoleuca acystidiata (holotype). Italy, Bolzano Distr., St. Jacob in Val di Vizze, 23 August 2007, photo R. Para.
Figure 6. Melanoleuca acystidiata (holotype). Italy, Bolzano Distr., St. Jacob in Val di Vizze, 23 August 2007, photo R. Para.
Jof 07 00191 g006
Figure 7. Melanoleuca acystidiata (BRNM 772203). Switzerland, Davos, Schatzalp, 25 June 2009, photo J. Borovička.
Figure 7. Melanoleuca acystidiata (BRNM 772203). Switzerland, Davos, Schatzalp, 25 June 2009, photo J. Borovička.
Jof 07 00191 g007
Figure 8. Melanoleuca castaneofusca (BRNM 761901). Czech Republic, Hořovice, Osek, Vystrkov, 12 November 2012, photo O. Jindřich.
Figure 8. Melanoleuca castaneofusca (BRNM 761901). Czech Republic, Hořovice, Osek, Vystrkov, 12 November 2012, photo O. Jindřich.
Jof 07 00191 g008
Figure 9. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (ANC M0194). Italy, Ferrara, Bosco Spada di Codigoro, 14 November 2008, photo R. Para.
Figure 9. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (ANC M0194). Italy, Ferrara, Bosco Spada di Codigoro, 14 November 2008, photo R. Para.
Jof 07 00191 g009
Figure 10. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (BRNM 817820). Czech Republic, Koda, 28 October 2009, photo O. Jindřich.
Figure 10. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (BRNM 817820). Czech Republic, Koda, 28 October 2009, photo O. Jindřich.
Jof 07 00191 g010
Figure 11. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (SLO 1632). Slovakia, Skalka nad Váhom, 10 October 2013, photo O. Ďuriška.
Figure 11. Melanoleuca luteolosperma (SLO 1632). Slovakia, Skalka nad Váhom, 10 October 2013, photo O. Ďuriška.
Jof 07 00191 g011
Figure 12. Melanoleuca microcephala (BRNM 761890). Slovakia, Ružomberok, Smrekovica, Skalná Alpa, 23 Sept. 2009, photo V. Antonín.
Figure 12. Melanoleuca microcephala (BRNM 761890). Slovakia, Ružomberok, Smrekovica, Skalná Alpa, 23 Sept. 2009, photo V. Antonín.
Jof 07 00191 g012
Figure 13. Melanoleuca paedida (ANC M0189). Italy, Colamauci di Celico, 16 November 2009, photo C. Lavorato.
Figure 13. Melanoleuca paedida (ANC M0189). Italy, Colamauci di Celico, 16 November 2009, photo C. Lavorato.
Jof 07 00191 g013
Table 1. The sequenced Melanoleuca specimens analyzed in the study. The newly obtained sequences are marked in bold.
Table 1. The sequenced Melanoleuca specimens analyzed in the study. The newly obtained sequences are marked in bold.
SpeciesCountry, LocalityHerbarium
Specimen
Genbank acc. no. (ITS)Genbank acc. no. (tef1)Genbank acc. no. (rpb2)
M. acystidiata, sp. nov.Italy, South Tyrol, St. Jacob in Val di VizzeANC M0205
holotype
JN616462
M. acystidiata, sp. nov.Switzerland, Davos, SchatzalpBRNM 772203MW491319MW488154MW488169
M. angelesianaItalyANC M0203JN616420
M. angelesianaUSA, Washington, Olympic Mts., Lake AngelsAFS 11438, syntypeMW491318
M. castaneofuscaItaly, Ravenna, Pineta di S. VitaleBRNM 761900MW491323MW488155MW488170
M. castaneofuscaCzech Republic, Hořovice, OsekBRNM 761901MW491320MW488156MW488171
M. castaneofuscaSlovakia, BratislavaSLO 1639MW491324
M. castaneofuscaItaly, Sardinia, CagliariCAG 921103-01MW491325
M. castaneofuscaFrance, LandrellecLIP RC86021MW491322
M. castaneofuscaUK, England, Surrey, Kew, Royal Botanic GardensK(M)92562MW491321MW488157MW488172
M. cognataSweden, Västergötland, TrollhättanGB65454JX429190
M. diverticulataSlovakia, Bratislava, LamačSLO 1566LT594155LT594172LT594188
M. exscissaSweden, Västergötland, TrollhättanGB65455, epitypeJX429192
M. exscissaHungary, BátorligetBRNM 772198LT594125LT594173LT594189
M. exscissaCzech Republic, MokrskoBRNM 781061LT594122LT594175LT594191
M. exscissaItaly, Ravenna, Pineta di S. VitaleBRNM 781066LT594123LT594174LT594190
M. fontenlae, sp. nov.Italy, Ravenna district, Lido di DanteBRNM 772194
holotype
MW491326MW488158MW488173
M. fontenlae, sp. nov.Slovakia, Cerová vrchovina Mts., Vlčia dolinaSAV F-3823MW491327MW488159MW488174
M. fontenlae, sp. nov.ItalyANC M0198JN616460
(as M. pseudopaedida)
M. friesiiSlovakiaBRNM 817799MT270866MT268581MT268606
M. galbuserae, sp. nov.Italy, Trentino, Pozza di Fassa MCVE4505, E. Bizio 1994-08-06JF908351MW488160MW488175
M. galbuserae, sp. nov.South Tyrol, SoldaBRNM 825710MW491333MW488161MW488176
M. galbuserae, sp. nov.South Tyrol, SoldaBRNM 825709, holotypeMW491332
M. grammopodiaCzech Republic, TřemošniceBRNM 762047KT279047KT279048KT279059
M. grammopodiaSlovakia, Veľká Fatra Mts., VrchlúkySLO 1463KP192264KT279049KT279058
M. grammopodiaSlovakia, Liptovské RevúceSLO 1468KP192267KT279051KT279061
M. grammopodiaSlovakia, Liptovské RevúceSLO 1466KP192269KT279050KT279060
M. grammopodiaSloveniaANC M0219JN616441
M. griseobrunneaSouth Korea, Yangpyeong, PyongchangBRNM 714980LT594151
M. griseobrunneaSouth Korea, Taean Peninsula, DeoksungBRNM 781058LT594152LT594165LT594179
M. humilisCzech Republic, PřerovBRNM 751965KJ425530KJ425543KT279057
M. humilisCzech Republic, KroměřížBRNM 710023KJ425531KJ425544KT279055
M. humilisCzech Republic, České BudějoviceCBKP192290KT279052KT279056
M. juliannae var. juliannaeHungary, ÖrkenyBRNM 751958KJ425538
M. juliannae var. juliannaeHungary, Budapest, RákospalotaBP 104371, holotypeKJ425539KJ425552LT594182
M. juliannae var. decoloransItaly, Altino di MontemonacoBRNM 751960, holotypeKJ425532KJ425545LT594181
M. leucopodaChinaHMAS 267626KF220638
M. longisterigmaMexico, Veracruz ENCB, Guzmán 19274JX429211
M. luteolospermaSlovakia, Velká Fatra Mts., LubochňaBRNM 761907MW491328MW488162MW488177
M. luteolospermaCzech Republic, Srbsko, BRNM 817820MW491329MW488163MW488178
M. luteolospermaSlovakia, Biele Karpaty, Skalka nad VáhomSLO 1632MW491331
M. luteolospermaGermany, Augsburg, Wittelsbacher ParkM 0139486, epitypeMW491330
M. malenconiiCzech Republic, Roudnice nad LabemBRNM 762051KP192275KT279053KT279062
M. malenconiiSlovakia, BratislavaSLO 1455KP192277KT279054KT279063
M. microcephalaSlovakia, Velká Fatra Mts., Ružomberok, Skalná AlpaBRNM 817787MW491334MW488164MW488179
M. microcephalaSlovakia, Velká Fatra Mts., Ružomberok, Skalná AlpaBRNM 817788MW491335MW488165MW488180
M. microcephalaItaly, South Tyrol, Franadega di DobbiacoANC M0196JN616449
M. paedidaItaly, Lombardy, Lago Cancano di ValfurvaR. Para 010907-02MW491337MW488166MW488181
M. paedidaItaly, Calabria, Colamauci di CelicoANC M0189JN616452
M. porphyropodaChinaHMAS 267624, holotypeKF220640
M. pseudoluscinaItalyANC M0191JN616455
M. pseudopaedidaFrance, SommeLIP, Bon 831105, holotypeMW491336
M. rasilisItaly, Monti Sibillini National ParkBRNM 751967LT594154LT594171LT594187
M. robertianaFrance, Jura, ChampagnoleLIP 72092034, holotypeMW491341
M. stepposaCzech Republic, IvančiceBRNM 781064LT594150LT594162LT594176
M. stepposaCzech Republic, BrnoBRNM 781099LT594147LT594163LT594177
M. strictipesCzech Republic, Staré HamryBRNM 737301KY417098MT268561MT268613
M. stridulaSlovakia, PodskalieBRNM 825716MW491340
M. stridulaAustria, EhrwaldBRNM 825717MW491338MW488167MW488182
M. stridulaSlovakia, Liptovský Hrádok, HybeSLO 1543MW491339MW488168MW488183
M. stridulaItalyANC M0007, neotypeJN616467
M. tristisCzech Republic, TřeboňBRNM 772197LT594137LT594168LT594184
M. tristisItaly, Ravenna, Pineta di S. VitaleBRNM 772192LT594135LT594167LT594183
M. tristisSlovakia, Lakšárska Nová VesSLO 1607LT594139LT594169LT594185
M. tristisSlovakia, ŠaštínSLO 1671LT594140LT594170LT594186
M. verrucipes AFTOL-ID 818DQ490642
M. verrucipesSwitzerlandMCVE 9962JF908354
M. zaaminensisUzbekistan, Pamiro-Altai Mts., KulsaiTAAM 121360, holotypeLT594141
Melanoleuca sp. CzechiaCzech Republic, IvančiceBRNM 781065LT594142LT594164LT594178
Melanoleuca sp. KoreaSouth Korea, MongsanpoBRNM 781059LT594153LT594166LT594180
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antonín, V.; Ševčíková, H.; Para, R.; Ďuriška, O.; Kudláček, T.; Tomšovský, M. Melanoleuca galbuserae, M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata—Three New Species in Subgenus Urticocystis (Pluteaceae, Basidiomycota) with Comments on M. castaneofusca and Related Species. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030191

AMA Style

Antonín V, Ševčíková H, Para R, Ďuriška O, Kudláček T, Tomšovský M. Melanoleuca galbuserae, M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata—Three New Species in Subgenus Urticocystis (Pluteaceae, Basidiomycota) with Comments on M. castaneofusca and Related Species. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(3):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antonín, Vladimír, Hana Ševčíková, Roberto Para, Ondrej Ďuriška, Tomáš Kudláček, and Michal Tomšovský. 2021. "Melanoleuca galbuserae, M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata—Three New Species in Subgenus Urticocystis (Pluteaceae, Basidiomycota) with Comments on M. castaneofusca and Related Species" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 3: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030191

APA Style

Antonín, V., Ševčíková, H., Para, R., Ďuriška, O., Kudláček, T., & Tomšovský, M. (2021). Melanoleuca galbuserae, M. fontenlae and M. acystidiata—Three New Species in Subgenus Urticocystis (Pluteaceae, Basidiomycota) with Comments on M. castaneofusca and Related Species. Journal of Fungi, 7(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop