Next Article in Journal
Principal Drivers of Fungal Communities Associated with Needles, Shoots, Roots and Adjacent Soil of Pinus sylvestris
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Associated with Cryptococcosis: A New Challenge during the Pandemic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/jof8101110
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Roles of BrlA and AbaA in Mediating Asexual and Insect Pathogenic Lifecycles of Metarhizium robertsii

by
Jin-Guan Zhang
,
Si-Yuan Xu
,
Sheng-Hua Ying
and
Ming-Guang Feng
*
Institute of Microbiology, Collegeof Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(10), 1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101110
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 19 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 21 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Fungi in Agriculture and Biotechnology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
BrlA and AbaA are key activators of the central developmental pathway (CDP) that controls asexual development in Aspergillus but their roles remain insufficiently understood in hypocerealean insect pathogens. Here, regulatory roles of BrlA and AbaA orthologs in Metarhizium robertsii (Clavicipitaceae) were characterized for comparison to those elucidated previously in Beauveria bassiana (Cordycipitaceae) at phenotypic and transcriptomic levels. Time-course transcription profiles of brlA, abaA, and the other CDP activator gene wetA revealed that they were not so sequentially activated in M. robertsii as learned in Aspergillus. Aerial conidiation essential for fungal infection and dispersal, submerged blastospore production mimicking yeast-like budding proliferation in insect hemocoel, and insect pathogenicity via cuticular penetration were all abolished as a consequence of brlA or abaA disruption, which had little impact on normal hyphal growth. The disruptants were severely compromised in virulence via cuticle-bypassing infection (intrahemocoel injection) and differentially impaired in cellular tolerance to oxidative and cell wall-perturbing stresses. The ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutant shad 255 and 233 dysregulated genes (up/down ratios: 52:203 and 101:122) respectively, including 108 genes co-dysregulated. These counts were small compared with 1513 and 2869 dysregulated genes (up/down ratios: 707:806 and 1513:1356) identified in ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants of B. bassiana. Results revealed not only conserved roles for BrlA and AbaA in asexual developmental control but also their indispensable roles in fungal adaptation to the insect-pathogenic lifecycle and host habitats. Intriguingly, BrlA- or AbaA-controlled gene expression networks are largely different between the two insect pathogens, in which similar phenotypes were compromised in the absence of either brlA or abaA.

1. Introduction

Beauveria and Metarhizium include species that represent classic insect pathogens of Cordycipitaceae and Clavicipitaceae (Hypocreales), respectively, and serve as main sources of fungal insecticides and acaricides crucial for green agriculture [1,2]. Aerial conidia of such fungi are usually produced as the active ingredient of fungal pesticides on artificial substrata, such as small grains [3]. Despite similar lifestyles, Metarhizium is considered to have evolutionarily acquired insect pathogenicity from plant-pathogenic or entophytic fungi approxiamtely130 million years (MY) later than Beauveria [2,4]. Perhaps due to this difference, the two fungal lineages have many sets of genes that are functionally differentiated or even differed in cellular processes and events vital for their adaptation to broad or specific host spectra and habitats [5,6,7,8]. They also feature different types of asexual developmental structures. Metarhizium spp. produce chained conidia on phialides, i.e., conidiophores developing from hyphae, while Beauveria spp. produce conidia on tiny zigzag rachises (conidiophores) and form spore balls (combination of conidia and zigzag rachises), which increase steadily in size and density during conidiation and are scattered when matured. However, little is known about any differences in genetic control of asexual development between the two lineages. Understanding such differences is important for improved production technology of high-quality conidia.
Aerial conidiation and conidial maturation is controlled by the central developmental pathway (CDP) in model Aspergillus and Penicillium species which form phialides and chained conidia (reviewed in refs. [9,10]). In Aspergillus nidulans, CDP is activated by BrlA to initiate conidiophore development [11], followed by sequential activation of AbaA and WetA in the middle and late phases of conidiophore development [12,13,14]. The sequential BrlA–AbaA–WetA activation leads to transcriptional activation of downstream genes involved in not only initiation of conidiation but also synthesis of spore wall components [15,16,17]. As a hallmark CDP player, BrlA is activated by three cascades consisting of FluG and FlbA–FlbE, which function in upstream developmental activation pathway (UDAP) [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. While the genetic control principles on asexual development of A. nidulans are established in pioneering studies, little is known about the evolution of gene regulatory networks associated with the diversity of asexual developmental and morphological structures in filamentous fungi [27]. Indeed, it is increasingly concerned whether the principles elucidated in A. nidulans are applicable to Pezizomycotina due to increasing evidence of remarkable genome divergence in ascomycetes [27,28,29,30]. As one of three CDP activators, for example, AbaA is revealed to have been independently lost in four lineages of Eurotiomycetes, including the whole order Onygenales and those unable to form phialides in other orders [30].
Homologs of those CDP and UDAP activators well characterized in A. nidulans exist in both Beauveria and Metarhizium and have been studied in Beauveria bassiana, which is a main source of wide-spectrum fungal pesticides. In B. bassiana, BrlA and AbaA act as master regulators of asexual developmental processes since aerial conidiation and submerged blastospore production essential for normal cuticle infection and subsequent hemocoel colonization were abolished in association with dysregulation of 1513 and 2869 genes in the knockout mutants of brlA and abaA, respectively [31]. WetA and downstream VosA also play essential roles in fungal conidiation and conidial maturation [32]. Despite similar regulatory roles for the CDP activators in asexual development of B. bassiana as seen in A. nidulans, the homologs of FluG and FlbA to FlbE have been shown to play no role in the activation of CDP, although they are required for fungal insect pathogenic lifestyle [33,34,35]. Nonetheless, only AbaA has been reported to regulate conidiation in M. robertsii and M. acridum, two insect pathogens previously classified to Metarhizium anisopliae sensu latu [36], and to bind the promoter region of veA in M. robertsii [37] or to be negatively mediated by NsdD in M. acridum [38]. However, other CDP activators remain functionally unexplored yet in Metarhizium spp. The different structures of Beauveria and Metarhizium in asexual development suggest possible differences in gene networks regulated by their key CDP activators. This study aimedto characterize functions of both BrlA and AbaA in M. robertsii and compare gene expression networks regulated by either activator with those shown previously in B. bassiana in order to reveal possible differences in genetic control of asexual development between the two insect pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Domain Analysis of brlA and abaA and Transcriptional Profiling of Their Genes

BrlA and AbaA orthologs were identified in the genome of M. robertsii [39] by BLASTp analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast.cgi, accessed on 18 October 2022) using the amino acid sequences of A. nidulansBrlA (XP_658577) and AbaA (XP_658026) as queries. Conserved domains of both orthologs predicted at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ (accessed on 18 October 2022) were compared with those of the queries and the counterparts characterized previously in B. bassiana [31]. A nuclear localization signal (NLS) motif in the sequence of each ortholog was predicted with a maximal probability at https://www.novopro.cn/tools/nls-signal-prediction (accessed on 18 October 2022) for comparison among the mentioned fungal species.
To reveal whether the three CDP genes brlA, abaA, and wetA are sequentially activated, the wild-type strain M. robertsii ARSEF 2575 (WT herein) was grown on the cellophane-overlaid plates of potato dextrose agar (PDA) by spreading 100 μL aliquots of a 107 conidia/mL suspension per plate (ϕ = 9 cm) at the optimal regime of 25 °C and 12:12 (light:dark) photoperiod. During the period of a 7-day incubation, total RNA was extracted daily from each of three plate cultures using an RNAiso Plus Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and reversely transcribed into cDNA with a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa). The transcripts of each target gene in three cDNA samples per day were quantified via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) with paired primers (Table S1) under the action of SYBRPremix Ex Taq (TaKaRa) and normalized based on the fungal 18S rRNA. Relative transcript levels of analyzed genes over the period of incubation were assessed with respect to a standard level at the end of a 2-day incubation using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

2.2. Subcellular Localization of brlA and abaA

The promoter Ptef1 of tef1, a gene-encodingtranslation elongation factor 1 alpha, was amplified from the WT DNA to take the place of the B. bassiana Ptef1 upstream of the C cassette (5′-EcoRI-XmaI-BamHI-PstI-HindIII-3′) in pAN52-C-gfp-bar [40]. Subsequently, the open reading frame of brlA or abaA amplified from the WT cDNA was ligated to the 5′-terminus of the green fluorescence protein gene gfp (GenBank U55763) at the enzyme sites of XmaI/BamHI. The constricted vector pAN52-C-x-gfp-bar (x = brlA or abaA) was integrated into the WT strain using a method of transformation regulated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens [41]. The putative transgenic colonies of each transformation were screened by the bar resistance to phosphinothricin (200 μg/mL). A colony chosen with its strong green fluorescence was incubated for conidiation on PDA at the optimal regime. Conidia from the culture were suspended in Sabouraud dextrose both (4% glucose and 1% peptone) plus 1% yeast extract (SDBY) for a 3-day incubation on a shaking bed (150 rpm) at 25 °C. Hyphae taken from the liquid culture were rinsed repeatedly in dd-H2O and stained with DAPI (4′,6′-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride) of 4.16 mM, followed by visualization with laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 358/460 and 488/507 nm to determine subcellular localization of BlrA-GFP or AbaA-GFP.

2.3. Generation of brlA and abaA Mutants

The target gene brlA or abaA was disrupted from the WT strain by homologous recombination of the 5′ and 3′ coding/flanking fragments separated by the reporter gene bar in p0380- 5′x-bar-3′x (x = brlA or abaA), as illustrated in Figure S1A,B. The deletion vector was constructed by amplifying the 5′ and 3′ fragments of each target gene from the WT DNA and inserting into appropriate enzyme sites (BamHI/PstIand XhoI/XmaI) of linearized p0380-bar, and transformed into the WT conidia for homologous recombination. To complement brlA or abaA into its null mutant, a full-length coding sequence of each target gene with flank regions was amplified from the WT DNA and ligated into linearized p0380-sur-gateway to substitute the gateway fragment under the action of Gateway BP Clonase II Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). The resultant vector p0380- sur-x was ectopically integrated into the protoplasts of an identified ΔbrlA or ΔabaA mutant, which produced neither aerial conidia nor submerged blastosporers, by means of polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation [42]. The used protoplasts were prepared as described previously [31]. Putative deletion and complementation mutant colonies were screened respectively by the bar resistance to phosphinothricin (200 μg/mL) and the sur resistance to chlorimuron ethyl (10 μg/mL), identified via PCR analysis (Figure S1C,D), and verified via qPCR analysis (Figure S1E,F). All of the paired primers used for the manipulation and detection of brlA or abaA are listed in Table S1. The identified ΔbrlA and ΔbrlA::brlA mutants and three ΔabaA mutants (ΔabaA 1–3), in which targeted gene complementation was not successful although many attempts were carried out, were used together with the WT strain in the following experiments. Each experiment includes three independent replicates per strain to meet a requirement for one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test.

2.4. Assays for Radial Growth Rates

For all tested strains, 100 μL aliquots of a hyphal suspension (fresh hyphal weight: 50 mg/mL; the same below unless specified otherwise) from a 3-day-old SDBY culture were spread onto cellophane-overlaid SDAY (i.e., SDBY plus 1.5% agar) plates and incubated at 25 °C for 3 days. Hyphal mass discs (5 mm diameter) taken from each culture with a cork borer were individually attached to the plate center of PDA, SDAY, 1/4 SDAY (amended with one-fourth of each SDAY nutrient), Czapek-Dox agar (CDA; 3% sucrose, 0.3% NaNO3, 0.1% K2HPO4, 0.05% KCl, 0.05% MgSO4, 0.001% FeSO4 and 1.5% agar) and CDAs amended with different amino acids as nitrogen sources. All inoculated plates were incubated for 7 days at the optimal regime, followed by estimation of each colony diameter with two measurements taken perpendicular to each other across the center.
The same method was used to initiate radial growth of each strain on CDA plates supplemented with H2O2 (2 mM), menadione (0.03 mM), Congo red (1 mg/mL), and calcofluor white (15 μg/mL), respectively. After a 7-day incubation at the optimal regime, the diameter of each colony was assessed as aforementioned. The diameters of stressed colonies (ds) and unstressed control colonies (dc) were used to compute relative growth inhibition percentage ((dc − ds)/dc × 100) of each strain under a given chemical stress.

2.5. Assays for Yields of Aerial Conidia and Submerged Blastospores

The 100 μL aliquots of a hyphal suspension per strain were evenly spread on PDA plates overlaid with cellophane film and incubated for 15 days at the optimal regime. Three plugs (5 mm diameter) were taken from each of the 3-, 7-, and 15-day-old cultures using the cork borer. Conidia in each plug were released into 1 mL of aqueous 0.05% Tween 80 via a 10 min supersonic vibration. Three samples taken from the resultant suspension were used to assess conidial concentration using a hemocytometer, and the concentration was converted to the number of conidia produced per unit area (cm2) of plate culture. Meanwhile, 7- and 15-day-old plate cultures were collected and dried for 6 h at 70 °C, followed by assessment of biomass level per plate. In addition, samples taken from the 5-day-old cultures of each strain were stained with the cell wall-specific dye calcofluor white and examined for conidiation status under a microscope.
To assess submerged blastospore yields, hyphal cells collected from the 3-day-old SDBY cultures of each strain were rinsed twice with sterile water and resuspended in 50 mL aliquots (fresh hyphal mass 1 mg/mL) of fresh SDBY in 150 mL flasks. Possible blastospores in each culture were removed by filtration through lens clearing tissues. All flasks were incubated for 3 days by shaking (150 rpm) at 25 °C. Three 50 μL samples were taken from each of three flasks per strain. Blastospore concentration (no. blastospores/mL) in each sample was assessed using a hemocytometer.

2.6. Assays for Hyphal Pathogenicity and Infection-Required Enzyme Activity

Since aerial conidiation and submerged blastospore production were both abolished in the absence of brlA or abaA, the 3-day-old SDBY cultures of all tested strains were prepared and filtered as aforementioned to remove possible blastospores of two control (WT and ΔbrlA::brlA) strains. The collected hyphae of each strain were suspended in 0.05% Tween 80 and standardized to a concentration of fresh weight 100 mg/mL. Normal cuticle infection (NCI) was initiated by immersing three groups of 35–40 Galleria mellonella larvae (4th instar) in 40 mL aliquots of each strain’s hyphal suspension for 15 s. Alternatively, a microinjector was used to inject 5 μL of each strain’s hyphal suspension (fresh weight 10 mg/mL) into the hemocoel of each larva in each group for cuticle-bypassing infection (CBI). All treated groups were held at the optimal regime. The survival or mortality records of each group were monitored every 12 or 24 h until the records were stabilized. The time-mortality trend in each group was subjected to modeling analysis for estimation of median lethal time (LT50) as an index of fungal virulence.
Total activities of extracellular enzymes (ECEs, involved in proteolysis, chitinolysis, and lipolysis) and subtilisin-like Pr1 proteases collectively required for NCI via cuticular penetration [43,44] were assessed from liquid cultures of each strain as described previously [45]. Briefly, 50 mL aliquots of a fresh hyphal 1 mg/mL suspension in CDB (i.e., agar-free CDA) amended with the sole nitrogen source of 0.3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) as an enzyme inducer were incubated at 25 °C for 3 days by shaking (150 rpm). The supernatant collected from each culture was used as a crude extract to measure optical densities at 442 and 410 nm (OD442 and OD410) as indices of total ECEs and Pr1 activities, respectively. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as an enzyme amount required for an OD442 or OD410 increase by 0.01 after 1 h reaction of each extract relative to a blank control. Hyphal mass collected from each culture was dried overnight at 70 °C, followed by quantification of its biomass level.
A status of each strain’s hemocoel colonization vital for mycosis development and host mummification was examined as described previously [46]. Briefly, hemolymph samples were taken from surviving larvae 6 days post-NCI and 3 days post-CBI. Hemolymp of 100 μL from each strain-infected larvae was added to 3 mL SDBY containingkanamycin (100 ng/mL) and ampicillin (200 ng/mL). After a 36 h shaking incubation at 25 °C, all cells were collected from the culture and resuspended in 0.05% Tween 80. The status and abundance of fungal cells and insect hemocytes in the suspension were examined under a microscope.

2.7. Transcriptomic Analysis

Four-day-old cultures of the ΔbrlA, ΔabaA-1, and WT strains (three cultures per strain) grown on cellophane-overlaid PDA plates at the optimal regime were sent to Lianchuan BioTech Company (Hangzhou, China) for construction and analysis of brlA- and abaA-specific transcriptomes as described previously [31,46]. Clean tags generated by filtration of all raw reads from sequencing were mapped to the M. robertsii genome [39]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified at the significant levels of both log2 ratio (fold change) ≤−1 or ≥ 1 and q < 0.05, and then enriched to GO terms in three function categories (p < 0.05) via Gene Ontology (GO) analysis (http://www.geneontology.org, accessed on 18 October 2022) and pathways (p < 0.05) via Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis (http://www.genome.jp/kegg, accessed on 18 October 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Domain Architecture, Transcription Profiles, and Subcellular Localization of brlA and abaA

The amino acid sequences of BrlA (KHO11655) and AbaA (EFZ03620) orthologs identified in the NCBI database of M. robertsii [39] were much less identical to the queries of A. nidulans (36.57% and 41.9%; e-values: 12 × 10−09 and 8 × 10−12; scores: 57.4 and 67.8; coverage: 20% and 10%, respectively) than those (72.46% and 68.37%; e-values: 7 × 10−157 and zero; scores: 444 and 1174; coverage: 100% and 100%) studied previously in B. bassiana [31]. Despite low sequence identity, the identified BrlA and AbaA orthologs (Figure 1A) featured two typical zinc-finger (ZnF-C2H2) domains at C-termini and an N-terminal TEA domain required for DNA binding [47], respectively. Notably, the BrlA zinc-finger domains in the three fungi were similar in size (23–26 amino acids (aa) per capita) while the AbaA TEA domain differed largely in molecular size between A. nidulans (70 aa) and the two insect pathogens (125 or 131 aa). Interestingly, a maximal probability predicted for an NLS motif of BrlA or AbaA in B. bassiana (0.87 or 0.92) or M. robertsii (0.91 or 0.89) was much greater than that in A. nidulans (0.44 or 0.32). For the brlA orthologs, additionally, the putative transcription units brlAα, brlAβ, and μORF found in M. roberstii showed low homology to those identified previously in A. nidulans [48] (Figure S2).
The brlA and abaA genes expressed in the WT strain showed differential time-course transcriptional profiles over the period of a 7-day incubation at the optimal regime (Figure 1B). Their transcript levels were not significantly upregualted until day 4 in comparison to the standard level on day 2, and the initial upregulation was one day later than that of wetA, the other CDP activator gene presumably downstream of abaA. Such transcription profiles demonstrated earlier activation of wetA than the simultaneous activation of brlA and abaA, implying that the three CDP genes were not sequentially activated in M. roberstii as elucidated in A. nidulans [9,10]. Instead, they seemed to be activated in a fashion independent of one another.
A nuclear localization of either BrlA or AbaA suggested by its NLS motif predicted at a high probability was confirmed by its GFP-tagged fusion protein expressed in the WT strain. Both BrlA-GFP and AbaA-GFP (shown in green) accumulated more in the nuclei than in the cytoplasm of hyphal cells stained with the nuclear dye DAPI (shown in red), forming a distinctively merged yellow color in the nuclei (Figure 1C). The confirmed nuclear localization suggested a role of BrlA or AbaA in certain nuclear events including mediation of gene expression.

3.2. Distinctive Roles of brlA and abaA in Radial Growth and Stress Response

The ΔbrlA and three ΔabaA mutants and the control (WT and ΔbrlA::brlA) strains showed similar growth rates and colony morphology during a 7-day incubation under normal culture conditions after their growths were initiated by hyphal mass discs attached to the plates of rich and minimal media (Figure 2A). The diameters of their 7-day-old colonies formed on each of the media PDA, SDAY, 1/4 SDAY, CDA, and CDAs amended with different amino acids as nitrogen sources (Figure 2B−D) were not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05 in Tukey’s HSD tests). Compared with the control strains, however, the ΔbrlA mutant was significantly more sensitive to oxidative stress induced by H2O2 or menadione (p < 0.05 in Tukey’s HSD tests) and much more sensitive to cell wall stress induced by Congo red or calcofluor white (p < 0.001 in Tukey’s HSD tests) (Figure 2E). In contrast, three ΔabaA mutants exhibited a similar increase only in sensitivity to calcofluor white among the tested chemical stressors on CDA plates.
The presented data revealed the greater role of brlA in the fungal response to cell wall perturbing stress than to oxidative stress, significant role of abaA in response to cell wall stress of calcofluor white, but dispensable role of either brlA or abaA in sustaining the fungal growth under normal culture conditions.

3.3. Indispensable Roles of brlA and abaA in Asexual Spore Production

The aerial conidiation level of each tested strain was assessed during a 15-day incubation on PDA at the optimal regime after initiation of its cultures by spreading 100 μL aliquots of a uniform hyphal suspension. Conidiophores and conidia were present in the samples taken from the 5-day-old cultures of the control strains and stained with a cell wall-specific dye but not in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ samples, in which thicker hyphae were not differentiated at all (Figure 3A). The 15-day-old cultures showed some differences in morphology among the tested strains (Figure 3B). The control strains’ conidiation statuses were well shown in their darkening cultures. In contrast, the ΔbrlA culture was consistently whitish. The ΔabaA mutants’ cultures were also whitish but yellowish in part, suggesting increased production of certain pigments in the absence of abaA. The biomass levels measured from the 7- and 15-day-old cultures of the ΔabaA mutants were significantly higher (p < 0.05 in Tukey’s HSD tests) than those not significantly different (p > 0.05) between the corresponding cultures of ΔbrlA and its control strains (Figure 3C). The mean (±SD) conidial yield produced by the control strains was 1.52 (±0.53) × 105 conidia/cm2 (n = 6) in their 3-day-old cultures and increased to 1.86 (±0.21) × 107 and 2.88 (±0.27) × 107 conidia/cm2 in their 7- and 15-day-old cultures respectively (Figure 3D). In contrast, aerial conidiation was completely abolished in ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ cultures during the 15-day incubation.
Submerged blastospore production indicates an ability for fungal cells to proliferate rapidly by yeast-like budding for host mummification to death after hyphal invasion into the host body and is controlled by BrlA and AbaA in B. bassiana [31]. In the present study, the mean blastospore concentration measured from the 3-day-old SDBY cultures of the control strains was 6.83 (±0.15) × 103 blastospores/mL (n = 6) while submerged blastospore production mimicking fungal proliferation in insect hemolymph was abolished in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ cultures (Figure 3E).
Altogether, BrlA and AbaA were indispensable for aerial conidiation and submerged blastospore production of M. roberstii as elucidated previously in B. bassiana [31]. In other words, BrlA and AbaA serve as regulators of asexual developmental processes.

3.4. Indispensable Roles of brlA and abaA in Insect-Pathogenic Lifecycle

In the bioassays with a standardized hyphal suspension, the control strains killed all G. mellonella larvae within 18 days post-NCI or 12 days post-CBI (Figure 4A), resulting in a mean LT50 (n = 6) of 6.99 (±0.89) days via NCI and 3.38 (±0.15) via CBI (Figure 4B). In contrast, few tested larvae died from the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants 20 days post-NCI, and the mean surviving percentages were up to 63% (±6.3, n = 3) and 59% (±6.0, n = 9) for the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants 13 days post-CBI, respectively. Therefore, no LT50 was accessible for any of the mutants against the model insect via NCI or CBI.
For insight into a complete loss of the mutant’s pathogenicity via NCI, total activities of NCI-required ECEs and Pr1 proteases were assessed from the supernatants of the 3-day-old cultures initiated with a standardized hyphal suspension in CDB-BSA. Surprisingly, no significant variability was found in the activities of either ECEs (F5,12 = 0.79, p = 0.58) or Pr1 proteases (F5,12 = 1.46, p = 0.27) among all of the mutant and control strains tested (Figure 4C). Neither was a significant variability found among the biomass levels (F5,12 = 1.14, p = 0.39) in their CDB-BSA cultures.
Next, a status of fungal hemocoel colonization was observed in the hemolymph samples taken from the larvae surviving 6 days post-NCI or 3 days post-CBI. After a 36 h shaking incubation of the samples in SDBY at 25 °C, the samples contained observable yeast-like budding cells formed by the control strains (Figure 4D). In contrast, the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ budding cells were not observable in the samples examined post-NCI and very few in the samples examined post-CBI.
All of these observations indicated an indispensability of either BrlA or AbaA for the insect-pathogenic lifecycle of M. robertsii. The marked attenuation of the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ virulence via CBI was attributable to a blockage of their proliferation in host hemoceol. However, the mutants’ ECEs and Pr1 activities not significantly different from the control strains’ counterparts revealed little clue to a complete loss of the mutants’ pathogenicity to the model insect via NCI. Other NCI-related cellular events, including conidial adhesion to, germination on, and hyphal invasion into insect integument, were hardly observable when asexual spore production was abolished.

3.5. Transcriptomic Insight into Regulatory Roles of brlA and abaA in M. robertsii

There were 255 and 233 DEGs (up/down ratios: 52:203 and 101:122 respectively; the same meaning for ratios mentioned below) identified from the transcriptomes of the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1 mutants versus the WT strain, respectively (Figure 5A; Tables S2 and S3). Intriguingly, 108 DEGs appeared in both ΔbrlA (19:89) and ΔabaA-1 (19:89), including 28 annotated as hypothetic proteins or functionally unknown; most of them were co- upregulated or co-downregulated in the two mutants (Table S4). The counts of DEGs were small in comparison to 1513 (707:806) and 2869 (1513:1356) DEGs identified in the previous ΔbrlA and ΔabaA transcriptomes of B. bassiana [31]. The counts of DEGs and the different up/down ratios in the present and previous ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants suggest that gene expression networks controlled by either BrlA or AbaA differ largely between M. robertsii and B. bassiana, although both of them are hypocrealean insect pathogens.
Previously, transcriptomic analysis revealed differential repression of other CDP activator genes in the absence of brlA or abaA in B. bassiana [31]. In the present study, surprisingly, the other CDP genes were not present or downregulated in either ΔbrlA or ΔabaA. This reinforced a likelihood that they could be activated independently as revealed by their time-course transcription profiles in the WT strain.
The GO analysis resulted in 34 and 10 terms enriched to three GO categories of ΔbrlA (Table S5) and ΔabaA-1 (Table S6) at the significance of p < 0.05, respectively. The ΔbrlA mutant had 138 (26:112), 114 (34:84) and 119 (29:90) DEGs enriched to 3, 15, and 16 terms of cellular component, biological process, and molecular function, respectively (Figure 5B). The terms of cellular component included cellular component (23:94), integral component of membrane (3:11), and plasma membrane (0:7). The main terms of biological process were biological process (16:52), obsolete oxidation-reduction process (4:10), cellular response to xenobiotic stimulus (0:5), and emericellamide biosynthetic process (0:3); many other terms in the category contained only one or two DEGs. The main terms of molecular function were molecular function (17:57), nucleotide binding (2:4), ATP hydrolysis activity (0:4), ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activity (0:4), nucleoside–triphosphatase activity (1:3) and iron ion binding (2:3). The very low up/down ratios in the mentioned GO terms implicated that cell component, biological process and molecular function were severely compromised in the absence of brlA. Despite fewer DEGs (76:104) enriched to limited GO terms, the ΔabaA mutant had three cellular component terms compromised (Figure 5C), including cellular component (39:46), integral component of membrane (3:7), and cytoplasmic vesicle (1:1). In ΔabaA-1 mutant, only two terms of biological process, i.e., emericellamide biosynthetic process (2:1) and obsolete pathogenesis (3:3), were affected while five molecular function terms were compromised, including mainly molecular function (23:40), acyltransferase activity (2:2) and glutathione transferase activity (0:2). The GO analysis revealed more profound impact of brlA disruption on gene expression networks than of abaA disruption in M. robertsii despite overlapping effects on the terms of cellular component, integral component of membrane, and molecular function. Indeed, the mentioned main GO terms comprised most of those genes co-dysregulated in both ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1.
Unexpectedly, the KEGG analysis revealed very limited information due to only a few DEGs enriched to two or three pathways at the significance of p < 0.05 (Figure 5D). The pathway of ABC transporters (map02010) was co-repressed in ΔbrlA (1:5) and ΔabaA-1 (1:3). One or two other pathways enriched were ascorbate and aldarate metabolism (map00053, 2:1) and fatty acid biosynthesis (map00061, 0:3) in ΔbrlA, and staurosporine biosynthesis (map00404, 3:1). The co-repressed pathway was seemingly related to the malfunction of the GO term known as an integral component of the membrane.

4. Discussion

In the present study, BrlA and AbaA were shown to localize in both the nuclei and the cytoplasm of hyphal cells and proved indispensable for the asexual cycle in vitro and in vivo but nonessential for hyphal growth in M. robertsii as characterized previously in B. bassiana [31]. The indispensability is highlighted by the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants’ inability to produce aerial conidia and submerged blastospores and to invade into insect body via cuticular penetration as well as their impaired capability of host hemocoel colonization. The ΔbrlA mutant was significantly compromised in cellular tolerance to two oxidants and two cell-wall-perturbing agents, contrasting to an increased sensitivity of the ΔabaA mutants to only a calcofluor white-induced stress. The present and previous studies reinforce not only conserved roles of BrlA and AbaA in regulating asexual development in hypocrealean insect pathogens as seen in model fungi [9,10] but also their essential roles in fungal adaptation to insect-pathogenic lifestyle and the environment. While similar phenotypes appeared in ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants, gene expression networks controlled by either BrlA or AbaA differed largely between the two insect pathogens, as discussed below.
First, the expression of brlA and abaA in M. robertsii was not upregulated until the end of a 4-day incubation and the upregulation was one day later than that of wetA, which was also activated earlier than abaA in B. bassiana [32]. Such time-course transcription profiles suggest non-sequential activation of the three CDP genes in M. robertsii and also the reason for using 4-day-old cultures for transcriptomic analysis in this study. Indeed, AbaA has been shown to bind the promoter region of veA in M. robertsii [37] and to be negatively mediated by NsdDin M. acridum [38]. The UDAP regulators FluG and FlbA to FlbE are known to activate the expression of brlA responsible for sequential activation of abaA and wetA in A. nidulans [9,10] but have proved unable to do so in B. bassiana [33,34,35]. The activation of brlA for initiation of asexual development in B. bassiana seems to be achieved via multiple routes or pathways other than UDAP, as discussed previously [31,33,34,35]. The previous and present studies suggest an infeasibility for sequential activation of three CDP genes in B. bassiana and M. robertsii.
Moreover, gene expression networks controlled by BrlA and AbaA are greatly simplified in M. roberstii in comparison to those in B. bassiana [31]. This is presented by much smaller counts of DEGs in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants of M. robertsii than of B. bassiana. Interestingly, enriched GO terms inΔbrlA (34) were far greater than those in ΔabaA (5) in M. roberstii. However, the situation was reversed in B. bassiana, namely 5 and 29 GO terms enriched toΔbrlA and ΔabaA respectively [31]. Most of those GO terms enriched to either ΔbrlA or ΔabaA were different between M. robertsii and B. bassiana irrespective of being categorized to cellular component, biological process, or molecular function. In a previous study to characterize the key transcription factor Msn2 downstream of the MAPK Hog1 signaling cascade, the counts of identified DEGs were 3% smaller and 12% greater in the Δmsn2 mutant’s responses of M. robertsii than of B. bassiana to oxidative stress and heat shock, respectively [49]. In addition, up to 1818 DEGs (1006:801) were identified from the deletion mutant’s transcriptome of cfp, a gene encoding small cysteine-free protein confirmed as a virulence factor in B. bassiana [50], while only 604 DEGs (251:353) were found in the deletion mutant’s transcriptome of a cfp homolog also acting as a virulence factor in M. robertsii [46]. In the present and previous studies, gene expression networks either controlled by BrlA and AbaA for asexual development and those controlled by Msn2 for stress responses or by CFP required for virulence are largely different between M. robertsii and B. bassiana. Such differences are likely due to a 130-MY difference of evolution histories in their adaptation to the insect-pathogenic lifestyle and host habitats [2,4].
Furthermore, the majority of genes dysregulated in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants of M. robertsii were enriched to only a few main GO terms, including cellular component, integral component of membrane, molecular function, and biological process collectively responsible for their phenotypic changes. Most of those co-dysregulated genes appeared in the main GO terms of the two mutants. Apart from those encoding hypothetic or unknown proteins, very limited DEGs were found to involve in specific cellular processes and events associated with abolished pathogenicity and blocked hemocoel colonization of each mutant. This is also different from marked linkages of hundreds of dysregulated genes to main phenotypic defects in the same mutants of B. bassiana [31].
Conclusively, BrlA and AbaA serve as master regulators of asexual development and insect pathogenic lifecycle in M. robertsii as they do in B. bassiana. However, gene expression networks controlled by BrlA or AbaA in M. robertsii are much simplified in comparison to those controlled by either ortholog in B. bassiana that could have adapted to the insect-pathogenic lifestyle ~130 MY earlier [2,4]. This finding sheds light on substantial differences of the key CDP activators-governed genetic backgrounds between the two insect pathogens as representatives of Cordycipitaceae and Claviciptaceae in Hypocreales.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8101110/s1, Figure S1: Generation and identification of brlA and abaA mutants in M. robertsii; Figure S2: Comparative DNA sequences of three transcription units found in the brlA orthologs of A. nidulans (An) and M. robertsii (Mr); Table S1: Paired primers used for manipulation and detection of brlA and abaA in M. robertsii; Table S2: A list of differentially expressed genes identified from the ΔbrlA mutant versus the WT strain of M. roberstii; Table S3: A list of differentially expressed genes identified from the ΔabaA-1 mutant versus the WT strain of M. roberstii; Table S4: A list of genes co-dysregulated in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1 mutants versus the WT strain of M. roberstii; Table S5: Counts of DEGs enriched to GO terms of three categories in the ΔbrlA mutant of M. robertsii; Table S6: Counts of DEGs enriched to GO terms of three categories in the ΔabaA-1 mutant of M. robertsii.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-G.F. and J.-G.Z.; methodology, J.-G.Z., S.-Y.X. and S.-H.Y.; software, M.-G.F. and S.-H.Y.; validation, J.-G.Z., S.-Y.X. and S.-H.Y.; formal analysis, M.-G.F.; investigation, J.-G.Z. and S.-Y.X.; resources, M.-G.F.; data curation, J.-G.Z. and M.-G.F.; writing—original draft, review and editing, M.-G.F.; visualization, M.-G.F.; supervision, M.-G.F. and S.-H.Y.; project administration, S.-H.Y.; funding acquisition, M.-G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 31772218).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not available.

Informed Consent Statement

Not available.

Data Availability Statement

All experimental data are included in this paper and Supplementary Material. All RNA-seq dataare available at the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession PRJNA875283 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/875283) aside from those reported in Tables S2–S6 in Supplementary Materials of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Faria, M.; Wraight, S.P. Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol. Control 2007, 43, 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, C.S.; Wang, S.B. Insect pathogenic fungi: Genomics, molecular interactions, and genetic improvements. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017, 62, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ye, S.D.; Ying, S.H.; Chen, C.; Feng, M.G. New solid-state fermentation chamber for bulk production of aerial conidia of fungal biocontrol agents on rice. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, C.S.; Feng, M.G. Advances in fundamental and applied studies in China of fungal biocontrol agents for use against arthropod pests. Biol. Control 2014, 68, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.B.; Feng, M.G. Antioxidant enzymes and their contributions to biological control potential of fungal insect pathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 4995–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tong, S.M.; Feng, M.G. Insights into regulatory roles of MAPK-cascaded pathways in multiple stress responses and lifecycles of insect and nematode mycopathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tong, S.M.; Feng, M.G. Phenotypic and molecular insights into heat tolerance of formulated cells as active ingredients of fungal insecticides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5711–5724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tong, S.M.; Feng, M.G. Molecular basis and regulatory mechanisms underlying fungal insecticides’resistance to solar ultraviolet irradiation. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Etxebeste, O.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U. Aspergillus nidulans asexual development: Making the most of cellular modules. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Park, H.S.; Yu, J.H. Genetic control of asexual sporulation in filamentous fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adams, T.H.; Boylan, M.T.; Timberlake, W.E. brlA is necessary and sufficient to direct conidiophore development in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 1988, 54, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mirabito, P.M.; Adam, T.H.; Timberlake, W.E. Interactions of three sequentially expressedgenes control temporal and spatial specificity in Aspergillus development. Cell 1989, 57, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sewall, T.C.; Mims, C.W.; Timberlake, W.E. abaA controls phialide differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans. PlantCell 1990, 2, 731–739. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tao, L.; Yu, J.H. AbaA and WetA govern distinct stages of Aspergillus fumigatus development. Microbiol. -UK 2011, 157, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sewall, T.C.; Mims, C.W.; Timberlake, W.E. Conidium differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans wild-type and wet-white (wetA mutant strains. Dev. Biol. 1990, 138, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marshall, M.A.; Timberlake, W.E. Aspergillus nidulans wetA activates spore-specific gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  17. Son, H.; Kim, M.G.; Min, K.; Lim, J.Y.; Choi, G.J.; Kim, J.C.; Chae, S.K.; Lee, Y.W. WetA is required for conidiogenesis and conidium maturation in the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lee, B.N.; Adams, T.H. fluG and flbA function interdependently to initiate conidiophore development in Aspergillus nidulans through brlAbeta activation. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Etxebeste, O.; Ni, M.; Garzia, A.; Kwon, N.J.; Fischer, R.; Yu, J.H.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U. Basic-zipper-type transcription factor FlbB controls asexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Etxebeste, O.; Herrero-García, E.; Araújo-Bazán, L.; Rodríguez-Urra, A.B.; Garzia, A.; Ugalde, U.; Espeso, E.A. The bZIP-type transcription factor FlbB regulates distinct morphogenetic stages of colony formationin Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73, 775–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Garzia, A.; Etxebeste, O.; Herrero-Garcia, E.; Fischer, R.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U. Aspergillus nidulans FlbE is an upstream development alactivator of conidiation functionally associated with the putative transcription factor FlbB. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 71, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Garzia, A.; Etxebeste, O.; Herrero-Garcia, E.; Ugalde, U.; Espeso, E.A. The concerted action of bZip and cMyb transcription factors FlbB and FlbD induces brlA expression and asexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75, 1314–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kwon, N.J.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Ugalde, U.; Yu, J.H. FlbC is a putative nuclear C2H2 transcription factor regulating development in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 1203–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kwon, N.J.; Shin, K.S.; Yu, J.H. Characterization of the developmental regulator FlbE in Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xiao, P.; Shin, K.S.; Wang, T.; Yu, J.H. Aspergillus fumigatus flbB encodes two basic leucine zipper domain (bZIP) proteins required for proper asexual development and gliotoxin production. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 1711–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Arratia-Quijada, J.; Sánchez, O.; Scazzocchio, C.; Aguirre, J. FlbD, a Myb transcription factor of Aspergillus nidulans, is uniquely involved in both asexual and sexual differentiation. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Etxebeste, O.; Otamendi, A.; Garzia, A.; Espeso, E.A.; Cortese, M.S. Rewiring of transcriptional networks as a major event leading to the diversity of asexual multicellularity in fungi. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 548–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. deVries, R.P.; Riley, R.; Wiebenga, A.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Amillis, S.; Uchima, C.A.; Anderluh, G.; Asadollahi, M.; Askin, M.; Barry, K.; et al. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ojeda-López, M.; Chen, W.; Eagle, C.E.; Gutiérrez, G.; Jia, W.L.; Swilaiman, S.S.; Huang, Z.; Park, H.-S.; Yu, J.-H.; Cánovas, D.; et al. Evolution of asexual and sexual reproduction in the aspergilli. Stud. Mycol. 2018, 91, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mead, M.E.; Borowsky, A.T.; Joehnk, B.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Shen, X.X.; Sil, A.; Rokas, A. Recurrent loss of abaA, a master regulator of asexual development in filamentous fungi, correlates with changes in genomic and morphologic altraits. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020, 12, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, A.X.; Mouhoumed, A.Z.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. BrlA and AbaA govern virulence-required dimorphic switch, conidiation and pathogenicity in a fungal insect pathogen. mSystems 2019, 4, e00140-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Li, F.; Shi, H.Q.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. WetA and VosA are distinct regulators of conidiation capacity, conidial quality, and biological control potential of a fungal insect pathogen. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10069–10081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guo, C.T.; Peng, H.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Distinctive role of fluG in the adaptation of Beauveria bassiana to insect-pathogenic lifecycle and environmental stresses. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 5184–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guo, C.T.; Luo, X.C.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Differential roles of five fluffy genes (flbA–flbE) in the lifecycle in vitro and in vivo of the insect-pathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, C.T.; Luo, X.C.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. FluG and FluG-like FrlA coregulate manifold gene sets vital for fungal insect-pathogenic lifestyle but not involved in asexual development. mSystems 2022, 7, e00318-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bischoff, J.F.; Rehner, S.A.; Humber, R.A. A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycologia 2009, 101, 512–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wu, H.; Tong, Y.M.; Zhou, R.; Wang, Y.L.; Wang, Z.X.; Ding, T.; Huang, B. Mr-AbaA regulates conidiation by interacting with the promoter regions of both Mr-veA and Mr-wetA in Metarhizium robertsii. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e00823-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Song, D.X.; Cao, Y.Q.; Xia, Y.X. MaNsdD regulates conidiation negatively by inhibiting the AbaA expression required for normal conidiation in Metarhizium acridum. Environ.Microbiol. 2022, 24, 2951–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, Q.; Jin, K.; Ying, S.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Xiao, G.H.; Shang, Y.F.; Duan, Z.B.; Hu, X.; Xie, X.Q.; Zhou, G.; et al. Genome sequencing and comparative transcriptomics of the model entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and M. acridum. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1001264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, D.Y.; Fu, B.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Two photolyases repair distinct DNA lesions and reactivate UVB-inactivatedconidia of an insectmycopathogen under visible light. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e02459-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fang, W.G.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yang, X.Y.; Zheng, X.L.; Duan, H.; Li, Y.; Pei, Y. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of Beauveria bassiana using an herbicide resistance gene as a selection marker. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2004, 85, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Brown, J.S.; Aufauvre-Brown, A.; Holden, D.W. Insertional mutagenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1998, 259, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ortiz-Urquiza, A.; Keyhani, N.O. Action on the surface: Entomopathogenic fungi versus the insect cuticle. Insects 2013, 4, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gao, B.J.; Mou, Y.N.; Tong, S.M.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Subtilisin-like Pr1 proteases marking evolution of pathogenicity in a wide-spectrum insect-pathogenic fungus. Virulence 2020, 11, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, J.; Ying, S.H.; Hu, Y.; Feng, M.G. Mas5, a homologue of bacterial DnaJ, is indispensable for the host infection and environmental adaptation of a filamentous fungal insect pathogen. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1037–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mou, Y.N.; Ren, K.; Xu, S.Y.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Three small cycteine-free proteins (CFP1–3) are required for insect-pathogenic lifestyle of Metarhizium robertsii. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hwang, J.J.; Chambon, P.; Davidson, I. Characterization of the transcription activation function and the DNA binding domain of transcriptional enhancer factor-1. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 2337–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Prade, R.A.; Timberlake1, W.E. The Aspergillus nidulans brlA regulatory locus consists of overlapping transcription units that are individually required for conidiophore development. EMBOJ 1993, 12, 2439–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Q.; Ying, S.H.; Li, J.G.; Tian, C.G.; Feng, M.G. Insight into the transcriptional regulation of Msn2 required for conidiation, multi-stress responses and virulence of two entomopathogenic fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013, 54, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mou, Y.N.; Fu, B.; Ren, K.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. A small cysteine-free protein acts as a novel regulator of fungal insect-pathogenic lifecycle and genomic expression. mSystems 2021, 6, e00098-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 08 01110 g001 550
Figure 1. Domain architectures, transcriptional profiles, and subcellular localization of BrlA and AbaA in M. robertsii (Mr). (A) Comparison of conserved domains and NLS motif predicted from amino acid sequences of BrlA and AbaA orthologs. An, A. nidulans. Bb, B. bassiana. (B) Relative transcript (RT) levels of three CDP genes in the Mr WT strain during a 7-day incubation on PDA at an optimal regime with respect to a standard on day 2. Error bars: standard deviations (SDs) of the means from three independent cDNA samples analyzed via qPCR. (C) LSCM images (scale bar: 5 μm) for subcellular localization of the BrlA-GFP and AbaA-GFP fusion proteins expressed in the WT strain. Images 1, 2, 3, and 4 are bright, expressed, DAPI-stained, and merged views of the same field, respectively. Hyphal nuclei are indicated by arrows.
Figure 1. Domain architectures, transcriptional profiles, and subcellular localization of BrlA and AbaA in M. robertsii (Mr). (A) Comparison of conserved domains and NLS motif predicted from amino acid sequences of BrlA and AbaA orthologs. An, A. nidulans. Bb, B. bassiana. (B) Relative transcript (RT) levels of three CDP genes in the Mr WT strain during a 7-day incubation on PDA at an optimal regime with respect to a standard on day 2. Error bars: standard deviations (SDs) of the means from three independent cDNA samples analyzed via qPCR. (C) LSCM images (scale bar: 5 μm) for subcellular localization of the BrlA-GFP and AbaA-GFP fusion proteins expressed in the WT strain. Images 1, 2, 3, and 4 are bright, expressed, DAPI-stained, and merged views of the same field, respectively. Hyphal nuclei are indicated by arrows.
Jof 08 01110 g001
Jof 08 01110 g002 550
Figure 2. Impact of brlA or abaA disruption on radial growth and stress response of M. robertsii. (A,B) Images and diameters of fungal colonies grown at the optimal regime of 25 °C and L:D 12:12 for 7 days on nutrition-rich (PDA, SDAY, and 1/4 SDAY) and minimal (CDA) media. (C,D) Diameters of 7-day-old fungal colonies grown at the optimal regime on CDA amended with different amino acids as nitrogen sources. (E) Relative growth inhibition (RGI) percentages of fungal colonies grown at 25 °C for 7 days on CDA plates supplemented with H2O2 (2 mM), menadione (MND, 0.03 mM), calcofluor white (CFW, 15 μg/mL), and Congo red (CGR, 1 mg/mL) respectively. All colonies were initiated with hyphal mass discs (ϕ = 5 mm) attached to plates. p < 0.05 * or 0.001 *** in Tukey’s HSD tests (ns, no significance). Error bars: SDs from three independent replicates.
Figure 2. Impact of brlA or abaA disruption on radial growth and stress response of M. robertsii. (A,B) Images and diameters of fungal colonies grown at the optimal regime of 25 °C and L:D 12:12 for 7 days on nutrition-rich (PDA, SDAY, and 1/4 SDAY) and minimal (CDA) media. (C,D) Diameters of 7-day-old fungal colonies grown at the optimal regime on CDA amended with different amino acids as nitrogen sources. (E) Relative growth inhibition (RGI) percentages of fungal colonies grown at 25 °C for 7 days on CDA plates supplemented with H2O2 (2 mM), menadione (MND, 0.03 mM), calcofluor white (CFW, 15 μg/mL), and Congo red (CGR, 1 mg/mL) respectively. All colonies were initiated with hyphal mass discs (ϕ = 5 mm) attached to plates. p < 0.05 * or 0.001 *** in Tukey’s HSD tests (ns, no significance). Error bars: SDs from three independent replicates.
Jof 08 01110 g002
Jof 08 01110 g003 550
Figure 3. Indispensability of either brlA or abaA for asexual spore production of M. robertsii. (A,B) Microscopic images (scale bar: 10 μm) of culture samples stained with calcofluor white after collected from 5-day-old cultures and images of 15-day-old cultures grown on PDA at the optimal regime of 25 °C and L:D 12:12. (C,D) Biomass levels and conidial yields of fungal cultures assessed during a 15-day incubation on PDA at the optimal regime. Each culture was initiated by spreading 100 μL of a fresh hyphal 50 mg/mL suspension. (E) Blastospore yields measured from the 3-day-old SDBY cultures initiated with fresh hyphal mass 1 mg/mL. * p < 0.05 in Tukey’s HSD tests. Error bars: SDs from three replicates.
Figure 3. Indispensability of either brlA or abaA for asexual spore production of M. robertsii. (A,B) Microscopic images (scale bar: 10 μm) of culture samples stained with calcofluor white after collected from 5-day-old cultures and images of 15-day-old cultures grown on PDA at the optimal regime of 25 °C and L:D 12:12. (C,D) Biomass levels and conidial yields of fungal cultures assessed during a 15-day incubation on PDA at the optimal regime. Each culture was initiated by spreading 100 μL of a fresh hyphal 50 mg/mL suspension. (E) Blastospore yields measured from the 3-day-old SDBY cultures initiated with fresh hyphal mass 1 mg/mL. * p < 0.05 in Tukey’s HSD tests. Error bars: SDs from three replicates.
Jof 08 01110 g003
Jof 08 01110 g004 550
Figure 4. Indispensability of brlA or AbaA for insect-pathogenic lifecycle of M. robertsii. (A) Survival trends of G. mellonella larvaeafter immersion in a fresh hyphal 100 mg/mL suspension for normal cuticle infection (NCI) and intrahemocoel injection of 5 μL fresh hyphal (10 mg/mL) suspension per larva for cuticle-bypassing infection (CBI). (B) LT50 values estimated from time-mortality trends. Triangles indicate an LT50 not accessible for ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants. (C) Total activities of cuticle degrading enzymes (ECEs and Pr1 proteases) and biomass levels assessed from the 3-day-old submerged cultures generated by shaking incubation of a fresh hyphal 1 mg/mL suspension in CDB-BSA. (D) Microscopic images (scale bar: 20 μm) for status and abundance of fungal budding cells (marked with red stars) and insect hemocytes (HC) in hemolymph samples, which were taken from surviving larvae 6 days post-NCI and 3 days post-CBI and incubated at 25 °C for 36 h in SDBY. Error bars: SDs from three independent replicates.
Figure 4. Indispensability of brlA or AbaA for insect-pathogenic lifecycle of M. robertsii. (A) Survival trends of G. mellonella larvaeafter immersion in a fresh hyphal 100 mg/mL suspension for normal cuticle infection (NCI) and intrahemocoel injection of 5 μL fresh hyphal (10 mg/mL) suspension per larva for cuticle-bypassing infection (CBI). (B) LT50 values estimated from time-mortality trends. Triangles indicate an LT50 not accessible for ΔbrlA and ΔabaA mutants. (C) Total activities of cuticle degrading enzymes (ECEs and Pr1 proteases) and biomass levels assessed from the 3-day-old submerged cultures generated by shaking incubation of a fresh hyphal 1 mg/mL suspension in CDB-BSA. (D) Microscopic images (scale bar: 20 μm) for status and abundance of fungal budding cells (marked with red stars) and insect hemocytes (HC) in hemolymph samples, which were taken from surviving larvae 6 days post-NCI and 3 days post-CBI and incubated at 25 °C for 36 h in SDBY. Error bars: SDs from three independent replicates.
Jof 08 01110 g004
Jof 08 01110 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of brlA or abaA disruption on gene expression networks of M. robertsii. (A) Counts of genes dysregulated and co-dysregulated in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1 mutants versus the WT strain. (B,C) Counts of dysregulated genes significantly enriched (p < 0.05) to GO terms of three function classes in ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1, respectively. (D) Counts of dysregulaated genes significantly enriched (p < 0.05) to KEGG pathways in the two mutants. The transcriptome was constructed based on three 4-day-old cultures (replicates) of the ΔbrlA, ΔabaA-1,and WT strains. All dysregulated genes were identified at the significant levels of log2 ratio (fold change) ≤−1 (downregulated, DnR) or ≥1 (upregulated, UpR) and q < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of brlA or abaA disruption on gene expression networks of M. robertsii. (A) Counts of genes dysregulated and co-dysregulated in the ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1 mutants versus the WT strain. (B,C) Counts of dysregulated genes significantly enriched (p < 0.05) to GO terms of three function classes in ΔbrlA and ΔabaA-1, respectively. (D) Counts of dysregulaated genes significantly enriched (p < 0.05) to KEGG pathways in the two mutants. The transcriptome was constructed based on three 4-day-old cultures (replicates) of the ΔbrlA, ΔabaA-1,and WT strains. All dysregulated genes were identified at the significant levels of log2 ratio (fold change) ≤−1 (downregulated, DnR) or ≥1 (upregulated, UpR) and q < 0.05.
Jof 08 01110 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.-G.; Xu, S.-Y.; Ying, S.-H.; Feng, M.-G. Roles of BrlA and AbaA in Mediating Asexual and Insect Pathogenic Lifecycles of Metarhizium robertsii. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101110

AMA Style

Zhang J-G, Xu S-Y, Ying S-H, Feng M-G. Roles of BrlA and AbaA in Mediating Asexual and Insect Pathogenic Lifecycles of Metarhizium robertsii. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(10):1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jin-Guan, Si-Yuan Xu, Sheng-Hua Ying, and Ming-Guang Feng. 2022. "Roles of BrlA and AbaA in Mediating Asexual and Insect Pathogenic Lifecycles of Metarhizium robertsii" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 10: 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop