Next Article in Journal
Genotypic and Phenotypic Structure of the Population of Phytophthora infestans in Egypt Revealed the Presence of European Genotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Aspergillus niger Six Constitutive Strong Promoters by Fluorescent-Auxotrophic Selection Coupled with Flow Cytometry: A Case for Citric Acid Production
Previous Article in Journal
A Denture Use Model Associated with Candida spp. in Immunocompetent Male and Female Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/jof8050467
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application in Aspergillus Species

by
Feng-Jie Jin
1,†,
Bao-Teng Wang
1,†,
Zhen-Dong Wang
1,
Long Jin
1 and
Pei Han
2,*
1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Key Laboratory of Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 9 Deng Zhuang South Rd, Beijing 100094, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(5), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050467
Submission received: 2 April 2022 / Revised: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 30 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Engineering of Aspergillus via CRISPR-Based Systems)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aspergillus, a genus of filamentous fungi, is extensively distributed in nature and plays crucial roles in the decomposition of organic materials as an important environmental microorganism as well as in the traditional fermentation and food processing industries. Furthermore, due to their strong potential to secrete a large variety of hydrolytic enzymes and other natural products by manipulating gene expression and/or introducing new biosynthetic pathways, several Aspergillus species have been widely exploited as microbial cell factories. In recent years, with the development of next-generation genome sequencing technology and genetic engineering methods, the production and utilization of various homo-/heterologous-proteins and natural products in Aspergillus species have been well studied. As a newly developed genome editing technology, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system has been used to edit and modify genes in Aspergilli. So far, the CRISPR/Cas9-based approach has been widely employed to improve the efficiency of gene modification in the strain type Aspergillus nidulans and other industrially important and pathogenic Aspergillus species, including Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus fumigatus. This review highlights the current development of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing technology and its application in basic research and the production of recombination proteins and natural products in the Aspergillus species.

1. Introduction

Filamentous fungi play a critical role in human health and disease, as well as in industrial and agricultural production. Aspergillus sp. is one of the most widely disseminated genera of fungi in nature, releasing a large number of conidia and dispersing them across the environment, including in grain, soil, and organisms. The genus Aspergillus is comprised of over 300 species based on morphological, physiological, and phylogenetic characteristics that have a considerable impact on food production, biotechnology, environments, and human health. [1]. This genus encompasses a large number of species that occupy an essential ecological niche in natural habitats as decomposers and pathogens. Aspergillus species has long been recognized as an important environmental microorganism in the breakdown of organic materials in terrestrial ecosystems [2]. Meanwhile, some species of the genus Aspergillus play key roles in the traditional fermentation and food processing industries due to their remarkable ability to produce a huge quantity of hydrolytic enzymes and other natural products and can thus be employed as microbial cell factories. For example, some Aspergillus strains, such as Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae, have been well utilized to produce a variety of beneficial substances, including citric acid, sake brewing, soy sauce, and so on [3,4,5]. Because of their long-term use in the food industry, both A. oryzae and A. niger are listed as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) organisms; the non-pathogeny of A. oryzae is also supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) [6].
A. oryzae has a high capacity for secreting huge numbers of hydrolytic enzymes and, therefore, it has been used as a cell factory in the enzyme industry to produce a variety of native and heterologous enzyme preparations [7,8,9]. Furthermore, A. niger is also a vital industrial production strain, with organic acids and industrial enzyme preparations being commonly produced [10,11,12]. Within the genus, Aspergillus nidulans has received widespread recognition as a model eukaryote in fungal fundamental research because its morphology, physiology, and growth conditions have been well characterized; in the meanwhile, it is a potential resource and is frequently employed in the production of industrial enzymes [13,14]. These Aspergillus strains have the advantages of easy culture, fast growth, and strong synthetic capacity; therefore, they are also well used in the production of other valuable natural products [15,16,17,18,19,20]. In A. nidulans, for example, more than 30 biosynthetic gene clusters have been identified to be associated with specific natural products, although half of them remain uncharacterized [21]. Aside from these, several Aspergillus spp. are also involved in human health and disease. For example, Aspergillus flavus produces aflatoxin, a carcinogen [22,23], and Aspergillus fumigatus causes aspergillosis [24,25]. In studies, these strains have been reported to harm the gut and respiratory organs of cattle, poultry, and even humans. Globally, Aspergillus is estimated to be responsible for over 200,000 invasive aspergilloses (IA) cases annually, the majority of which are caused by A. fumigatus [26]. As the most prevalent airborne fungal pathogenic species found in nature, A. fumigatus is becoming an increasingly lethal threat to immunocompromised individuals. Despite the fact that information on the A. fumigatus genome sequencing is available through online genomics resources, a large number of genes that may be involved in pathogenicity remain poorly understood. The increasing number of entire genomes sequenced from various fungal species, including Aspergillus spp., has raised the bar for genetic modification in the study of filamentous fungi [27,28,29]. Recent advances in genetic manipulation techniques, such as the development of various selective markers, improved transformation efficiency, and improved gene deletion efficiency, among others [30,31,32], have greatly facilitated these basic studies and breeding for industrial production [33,34,35]. However, these genetic manipulation techniques still require a significant amount of labor and time to prepare the host/vector systems for each industrial strain for further industrial production. Recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-related nuclease 9 (Cas9) system, a versatile genome-editing technique that may give more precise gene modification, has been extensively developed and employed in a wide range of fields of filamentous fungi [36,37,38]. With its advantages of simple manipulation, targeted specificity, high-efficiency single/multiple-gene editing, and a wide range of versatility, the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing approach has been well applied to various Aspergillus species.
In this review, the overall technological advancements of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategies and their applications in basic research and the production of recombinant proteins and natural products in Aspergillus spp. are outlined and explored.

2. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing in Aspergillus Species

From prokaryotes to eukaryotes, the CRISPR/Cas system has been proven to effectively modify genes in virtually all species [37,39,40]. The CRISPR/Cas system could be classified into two categories and six major types [41,42]. Currently, as a simpler CRISPR system, the type II CRISPR/Cas9 system has been widely used in different species. The type II system is comprised of nuclease (Cas9), mature CRISPR RNA (crRNA), trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA), and RNaseIII. In addition, the crRNA can combine with the tracrRNA to generate a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) complex [43], which may effectively induce the Cas9 nuclease to cleave the target sequences.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotes can be repaired by two DNA self-repair mechanisms: the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous directed repair (HDR) pathways. When DSBs occur, the genomic DNA initiates its repair process, and as the dominant repair pathway, the NHEJ can lead to genomic alteration by causing random loss, insertion, and replacement of bases at DSB locations. The HDR pathway, on the other hand, allows for precise editing of target genes with the use of exogenous donor DNA [36,44].
CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing technology is currently being employed extensively in filamentous fungi, including numerous vital genera, such as Neurospora, Trichoderma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus [45,46,47,48]. This genome editing strategy and its application have been well established, particularly in Aspergilli.

2.1. Cas9 Expression

The CRISPR/Cas9 system was first discovered as an immunological defense system in bacteria and archaea. With a total length of approximately 1400 amino acids, the Cas9 protein originating from the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes is a critical component of this genome editing machinery that functions as a nuclease [49]. When CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing is applied to filamentous fungi, the Cas9-encoding gene usually needs to be codon-optimized and fused with a nuclear localization signal for its correct expression and localization [48,50]. An identified SV40 nuclear localization sequence (NLS; PKKKRKV) has been effectively exploited to guide the nuclear localization of Cas9 in many filamentous fungi, such as the genus Aspergillus [48,51].
Furthermore, another major factor determining the expression efficiency of the cas9 heterologous gene is the promoter employed for Cas9 protein production. Therefore, choosing the right promoters is crucial for the CRISPR/Cas9 system to work properly. Several commonly used promoters have been successfully applied to drive the expression of Cas9 protein in Aspergillus species, such as the promoters of tef1 (translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene), gpdA (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene), amyB (α-amylase gene), and glaA (glucoamylase gene) [48,50,52,53,54] (Table 1). In addition to these typical promoters, PpkiA, PcoxA, and other promoters have also been effectively employed to express Cas9 in Aspergillus species [52,55]. Cas mutants and their fusion with other functional proteins may be able to extend genome editing capabilities even further. Previous research has demonstrated that, in mammalian cells, a unique approach called “base editor” has been developed that avoids DNA damage during genome editing and does not require the provision of an HDR donor template [56]. It has been confirmed that a catalytic mutant of SpCas9 (D10A nickase) may facilitate gene editing via HDR without NHEJ-induced insertion-deletion formation [49]. The Cas9 mutant (D10A nickase) is used in combination with a rat cytidine deaminase and uracil glycosylase inhibitor to convert cytidine (C) to uridine (U) at the target sites. This base editing technique has been successfully applied in Aspergillus, where it can directly edit single nucleotides and cause high-frequency C→T replacement [57].
The specific cleavage site of Cas protein in the genome depends on both the guide RNA (gRNA) and the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). At present, the PAM sequence of SpCas9 from S. pyogenes commonly used in Aspergillus is 5′-NGG-3′ [49]. Unlike bacteria, most filamentous fungi lack native extra chromosome replicating DNA elements, such as plasmids. However, studies have shown that AMA1 (autonomously maintained in Aspergillus) derived from A. nidulans can be used to construct autonomous replicating plasmids, which are often employed to express Cas9 and sgRNA. Multiple copies of AMA1-carrying plasmids within a cell may lead to increased expression of Cas9 and sgRNA, thus boosting the mutation efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [52,58]. Furthermore, when the plasmid also carried a pyrG selective marker, the AMA1-based plasmid may be easily removed in the presence of 5-fluoroorotic acid and uridine, allowing the pyrG and Cas9 components to be recycled [59]

2.2. Guide RNA Expression

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is an RNA-guided nuclease system that can efficiently execute sequence-specific DNA cleavage. The gRNA in the natural CRISPR/Cas system of bacteria or archaea consists of two regions: a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) harboring a target recognition sequence of 20-nucleotide at the 5′-end and a trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) for Cas9 engagement. In the presence of endogenous RNase III, the tracrRNA guides the precursor crRNA to be processed into mature crRNA [60]. To generate genetic mutations through CRISPR, the gRNA can provide sequence specificity to the target DNA, which forms an RNA/DNA hybridization and recruits the Cas9 nuclease to cause DSB at the target genomic locus.
gRNA is often driven by endogenous RNA polymerase III U6 promoters in most organisms, and these promoters exhibit base-preference and persistence in the transcriptional process [61]. The U6 is known to be the most highly conserved small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and its promoter has been exploited for gRNA transcription in filamentous fungus, including Aspergillus [48,51]. Another RNA polymerase III U3 promoter was also successfully used for gRNA transcription in A. nidulans [50,62]. In addition, the transfer ribonucleic acid gene (tRNA) promoters have also been well used for gRNA expression [55]; however, unlike the U6 promoter, the genome-editing efficiency driven by different tRNA promoters varies greatly between strains. In addition to these, a high-efficiency promoter of the 5S rRNA gene, which is highly conserved and efficiently expressed in eukaryotes, was discovered and exploited as a gRNA promoter for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in A. niger [54]. This study used the 5S rRNA gene combined with its 338-bp upstream sequence as a promoter to fuse with gRNA sequence for gRNA expression. The results demonstrated that the 5S rRNA promoter has a greater gene disruption efficiency than those of U6 and other promoters, and the CRISPR/Cas9 system based on the endogenous 5S rRNA promoter showed a gene disruption efficiency of nearly 96%. Recently, using the ribozyme self-processing capacity, the RNA polymerase II promoter was exploited for sgRNA expression through a ribozyme-gRNA-ribozyme gene system to synthesize mature sgRNA. According to this, a powerful constitutive gpdA promoter (PgpdA) from A. nidulans was used to construct a gRNA expression cassette, which was successfully applied to Aspergillus species [50,63].
Thus far, two kinds of CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been exploited for use in Aspergillus genetic engineering. The first is a plasmid vector expressing system, which contains the elements for expressing the Cas9 and gRNA in vivo, as previously stated; the second is a plasmid-free CRISPR/CAS9 approach, which has also recently been developed and is well adapted for genetic alteration [11,64,65]. In the plasmid-free CRISPR/Cas9 system, the Cas9 protein and sgRNA can be assembled in vitro to generate a stable Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, and then transferred into fungal protoplasts for genome editing via PEG or other transformation methods. The RNP-based method accurately controls the concentrations of the purified Cas9 protein and synthetic gRNA for in vitro assembly, thereby reducing the risk of off-target events. However, although RNP complexes may be utilized directly for genome editing, the approach lacks a selective marker for fungal transformation. Therefore, in some cases, an additional vector harboring a selective marker gene needs to be provided [11]. Recently, the RNP-based CRISPR/Cas9 system was successfully applied to Aspergillus, resulting in a marked increase in succinic acid production in the A. niger-engineered strain [11].

2.3. Donor DNA

Cas9-induced DSBs can either be directly subjected to NHEJ-mediated repair that generates insertion/deletion mutagenesis or can be repaired by HDR by providing a DNA repair template (donor DNA) to the target site for homologous recombination (HR). The NHEJ repair pathway is completely distinct from the HDR repair system in that it can introduce non-specific insertions or deletions at the cleavage site by directly connecting the ends of DNA DSBs, whereas the HDR pathway allows a precise gene editing that only occurs during DNA replication. During DNA damage repair, the provision of homologous DNA fragments might greatly improve gene targeting and repair efficiency via HR. In addition, the Ku70, Ku80, and LigD proteins are known to play essential roles in the NHEJ repair pathway, and the deletion of genes encoding these proteins leads to dramatically improved HR efficiency [30,66,67]. This has been well combined with CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing technology, which can significantly raise the efficiency of gene targeting when a donor DNA fragment is provided [48,68]. In Aspergillus, co-transformation of fungal cells with the genome editing plasmid and circular/linear donor DNA fragments enabled marker-free multiplex gene deletion or integration. Selectable markers or drug resistance markers added into the donor DNA, on the other hand, can further improve the effectiveness of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Aspergillus genome engineering [26,53]. In summary, the CRISPR/Cas9 system allows precise gene editing via the HDR pathway by providing donor DNA, such as introducing a specific point mutation or precisely replacing a target sequence with a desired one by inserting a designed sequence into target sites [50,53,58].

2.4. Off-Target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology has been successfully used in a variety of biological studies due to its high specificity, relatively simple manipulation, and high efficiency, but its off-target effects have also attracted widespread attention. In general, the off-target effect of the CRISPR/Cas9 system is mostly due to the recognition specificity of Cas9/sgRNA complex to target genes on the genome. Cas9 nucleases, for example, can recognize and cleave the mismatched base of an untargeted sequence, causing serious off-target effects. The RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases could be highly active, even with imperfectly matched RNA-DNA interfaces in human cells [69], and the detected off-target sites harbored up to five mismatches for each gRNA. Therefore, how to reduce the off-target effects is a major concern in genome editing. Screening and exploiting Cas mutants with high recognition specificity, rational design, selection of sgRNAs, regulation of Cas protein and sgRNA expression level, and other ways, are currently being used to limit off-target effects. Firstly, an S. pyogenes Cas9 mutant (SPCas9-HF1) with high recognition specificity was constructed to avoid genome-wide off-targets. This mutant is designed to significantly reduce the non-specific DNA contacts with mismatched sequences while retaining on-target activities, thus reducing the risk of off-target [70]. Second, sgRNA design tools or off-target risk prediction software can be used to assess the specificity of the target sequence in the genome. For instance, sgRNAcas9, a software package, is available (www.biootools.com, accessed on 1 April 2022) for predicting the potential off-target cleavage sites and designing sgRNA to improve CRISPR-Cas9 specificity for targeted genome editing [71]. Previous studies also showed that high concentrations of Cas9/gRNA complexes could trigger off-target effects. Therefore, thirdly, studies attempted to regulate the expression levels of sgRNA and Cas proteins. Down-regulating the transcription and translation levels of sgRNA and Cas proteins in cells has been found to significantly reduce the risk of off-targets [72]. Recently, a CRISPR/Cas9 system designed exclusively for transient expression was further developed [73]. When the Cas9 protein and sgRNA are assembled in vitro to form a stable RNP complex and subsequently transform into the fungal cells, the off-target effects can also be reduced due to their instantaneous existence. In addition, RNP transformation minimizes the likelihood of genetic material being integrated into non-target regions of the genome. These strategies provide effective schemes for decreasing the off-target effects of genome editing, thereby improving the specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Aspergillus species.

3. Development and Application of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing Technology in Several Aspergillus Species

Aspergillus fungus serves a critical role in the production of secreted proteins and the decomposition of organic matter, making them popular in the food fermentation industries and for recombinant protein production. Recently, they have also been widely used as hosts for the production of industrially valuable secondary metabolites. Despite the fact that the Aspergillus spp. have been used to manufacture a range of critical enzymes and/or natural metabolites, wild-type strains are often unable to produce the desired products at the industrial level. Therefore, genetic engineering techniques are utilized to further boost the productivity of these industrial strains, whereas traditional genetic manipulation approaches are time-consuming and laborious.
More recently, the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing technique has been well applied in the basic research and manufacturing applications of natural products and recombinant proteins in the genus Aspergillus (Table 1) [74,75].

3.1. Aspergillus Nidulans

The Aspergillus species is considered as a suitable host for industrial enzyme production because of its high secretion capacity and safety. A. nidulans, as a type strain in the genus Aspergillus, plays a key role in basic fungal research; meanwhile, it has also been widely applied in the production of industrial enzymes and natural products [13,21]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was first established for genetic engineering in Aspergilli, including A. nidulans, A. niger, A. aculeatus, and others, by Nodvig et al. [63]. In this study, mutations in the yA gene, which can change the color of spores, were utilized to investigate the efficiency of this genome editing. Following that, Cpf1, a new tool originating from Lachnospiraceae bacterium, was employed to replace the Cas9 nuclease in the fungal CRISPR technology [62]. The codon-optimized Lb_cpf1 nuclease mediated CRISPR experiments have shown that Cpf1 can be used effectively for gene editing in Aspergilli. Recent studies have also shown that CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation of fungal biosynthetic gene clusters could accelerate the discovery of genomics-driven bioactive natural products [76]. Using the established strategy, the enhanced production of the compound microperfuranone was achieved by targeting the native nonribosomal peptide synthetase-like (NRPS-like) gene micA in A. nidulans.

3.2. Aspergillus Niger

A. niger is a well-established industrial cell factory that can produce organic acids and a variety of industrial enzymes. Its extraordinary tolerance to extremely acidic environments and ability to hydrolyze a wide range of polymeric substances make it a suitable cell factory for diverse biotechnological applications. The development of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing techniques, including multi-gene editing, traceless gene editing, and fine regulation of gene expression, provides a powerful tool for studying gene function and constructing and optimizing cell factories in A. niger. Recently, the CRISPR/Cas9 method combined with synthesized sgRNA in vitro was used to disrupt genes involved in galactaric acid catabolism, allowing for efficient galactaric acid production in A. niger [53]. This was the first time that CRISPR/Cas9 technology was successfully used for metabolic engineering in A. niger. Subsequently, using the same CRISPR/Cas9 strategy, the effective deletion of gluD, which encodes an NADPH requiring 2-keto-L-gulonate reductase involved in D-glucuronic acid catabolism, resulted in the accumulation of 2-keto-L-gulonate in the liquid cultivation [77]. Likewise, Kuivanen et al. [78] also demonstrated that the disruption of the gluF gene by CRISPR/Cas9 in A. niger caused the strain to lose its ability to catabolize D-glucuronate. These findings suggest that the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing approach has been successfully used to investigate unexplored metabolic pathways and functional genes in A. niger. On this basis, an optimized CRISPR/Cas9 method based on Cas9/gRNA RNP complexes assembled in vitro was further developed, which achieved 100% targeting efficiency for single genome editing [64,79]. This approach has also been proven to be suitable for metabolic engineering application of multiplexed genome editing with two or three genomic targets, resulting in increased galactarate production in A. niger [64]. In A. niger, a Cas9 mutant (D10A nickase), fused with a rat cytidine deaminase, has been exploited for single-base editing, which might result in high-frequency CT substitution at the target sites. This Cas9 mutant is an inactivated nuclease that does not generate DNA DSBs, thus preventing unnecessary deletion or insertion. This newly developed base editing system provides a more convenient tool for studying gene function through targeted genetic alteration [57]. A. niger, as a cell factory, is used to produce a variety of proteins and organic acids, and protein secretion is commonly linked to mycelial growth. CRISPR-based genome editing was used to examine the association between protein secretion and filamentous growth by placing the inducible Tet-on conditional expression system upstream of related genes such as ageB, secG, and geaB in studies [80]. The Tet-on system, which employs sophisticated conditional gene expression, can reawaken the biosynthesis of natural products in A. niger. The CRISPR/cas9 genome editing strategy, in combination with the Tet-on system, may provide a new approach to enhance protein and organic acid production. As mentioned above, using the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing techniques, more experiments on the production and research of enzyme preparations (e.g., pectinases, trehalase, etc.) [75,81,82] and natural metabolites (e.g., citric acid, succinic acid, etc.) [11,83] were conducted in A. niger. For example, A. niger naturally secretes pectinases to degrade pectin, one of the main carbon sources for filamentous fungi, and W361R mutation in the transcriptional activator GaaR caused by CRISPR/Cas9 leads to constitutive production of pectinases [81]. In another study, Myceliophthora thermophila thermostable trehalase (MthT), which can catalyze the hydrolysis of the non-reducing disaccharide trehalose, was heterologously high-expressed in A. niger using a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multi-copy knock-in expression strategy, with the yield reaching 1698.83 U/mL. The addition of the recombinant MthT into 30% starch saccharification liquid greatly boosted the ethanol conversion rate in ethanol fermentation [75]. In experiments with natural metabolite production, the genome editing method disrupted pyrG, which encodes the orotidine-5-decarboxylase, resulting in a 2.17-fold increase in citric acid production compared to the control, suggesting that inhibition of uridine/pyrimidine synthesis could promote citric acid overproduction [83]. In addition, the well-established RNP-based CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully used in A. niger genetic engineering, and significantly improved the succinic acid production by disrupting and overexpressing multiple relevant genes in the engineered strain [11]. Recently, with the improvement of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategies, an increasing number of studies on gene function and metabolic regulation have been completed in A. niger [84,85].

3.3. Aspergillus Oryzae

A. oryzae, as an important strain in the traditional fermentation and food processing industries, has been well studied and utilized. A. oryzae has been known to have a strong ability to secrete large amounts of hydrolytic enzymes, and this property has been widely exploited in the production of recombinant proteins and secondary metabolites [86]. In recent years, the CRISPR/Cas9 system, a versatile genomic editing technology, has been rapidly developed in A. oryzae to better adapt to its application in industrial production [87]. Katayama et al. [48] were the first to establish CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in A. oryzae successfully. In this study, they constructed the plasmids expressing the codon-optimized cas9, in which an SV40 nuclear localization sequence was fused to both the N- and C-terminus of the cas9 gene. The resulting transformed strains have a mutation rate of 10–20%, with most of the mutations being 1-bp deletion or insertion. On this basis, by examining the deletion effect of an ecdR gene linked with sclerotial formation [88], it was demonstrated that mutation of ligD, a DNA ligase gene involved in NHEJ, significantly enhanced the targeting efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in A. oryzae industrial strains [68]. In addition, an improved A. oryzae CRISPR/Cas9 approach, which allows for effective multiple gene deletion or introduction, was well established by recycling AMA1-based genome editing plasmids bearing the drug resistance marker ptrA [58]. When a circular donor DNA is provided, this approach greatly boosts HDR-mediated genome editing efficiency. In addition, an instantaneous genome editing technique based on cas9-gRNA RNP complex assembled in vitro has also been successful established in A. oryzae [89].
Using these developed genome editing techniques, a variety of basic and production application research was further attempted in A. oryzae industrial strains. For instance, adalimumab, a human anti-TNFα antibody, was produced by fusing it with AmyB, a α-amylase. Then, CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing was used to delete the Aooch1 encoding a key enzyme of hyper-mannosylation process, to assess the recombinant antibody’s capacity to bind to FcγRIIIa [90]. This genome editing system was used to investigate the functional characterization of glycerol dehydrogenase, revealing that AoGld3, a glycerol dehydrogenase, is involved in the production of the secondary metabolite kojic acid by influencing the expression of kojA (an enzyme gene) and kojR (a transcription factor gene) involved in the kojic acid biosynthesis [91]. Moreover, using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, single and double gene disruption of two intracellular triacylglycerol lipases, AoTgla and AoTglb, revealed that disfunction of either AoTgla or AoTglb improved total lipid contents, particularly in the triacylglycerol (TAG) fraction [92]. The biosynthesis of oligopeptides with functional activities has become a research hotspot. In a recent study, promoter exchange of the ACV synthetase (a non-ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS)) gene (acv), was implemented by CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for bioactive oligopeptide production in A. oryzae [93].

3.4. Aspergillus Fumigatus and Other Aspergillus Species

This CRISPR/Cas9 approach has been successfully applied not only to metabolic engineering of the above industrial fermentation strains, but also to the gene manipulation of human pathogenic fungus A. fumigatus and other Aspergillus species. In A. fumigatus, the pksP gene, which is required for melanin production, was used as a case study to initially validate the genome editing efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [94]. On this foundation, a high-efficiency CRISPR genome editing method was established, which carries out precise in-frame integration with an accuracy of 95–100% using an extremely short (about 35-bp) homologous arm (microhomology-mediated end joining, MMEJ) [26]. Using the MMEJ-mediated approach, an exogenous GFP, pksP (a conidial melanin gene), and cnaA (a catalytic subunit of calcineurin gene) were precisely integrated and edited at multiple expected sites. Trypacidin is one of the natural components of the opportunistic human pathogens produced by A. fumigatus. Cas9-mediated gene editing was successfully exploited for the functional reconstitution of tynC, encoding a polyketide synthase of the trypacidin biosynthetic pathway in a nonproducing A. fumigatus strain [95]. Triazole antifungal drugs are indispensable in the clinical treatment of invasive aspergillosis, and triazole-resistant A. fumigatus is recognized as a global health issue. Generally, triazole resistance generated by Cyp51A specific amino acid substitution exhibits a typical pattern depending on the mutation site. In a recent study, Cyp51A and Hmg1 mutations that contribute to atypical triazole resistance were assessed using the established RNP-based CRISPR/Cas9 approach in A. fumigatus [96,97]. Then, in another study of antifungal drugs, researchers used the RNP-based CRISPR/Cas9 system to disrupt genes encoding putative protein kinases in A. fumigatus to identify the genes required for fungal survival under the stress of echinocandin, an antifungal with a limited effect on invasive aspergillosis [98]. Surprisingly, the identified protein kinases were found to be necessary for both hyphal septation and A. fumigatus’s capacity to invade lung tissue. In addition to these industrially important strains and pathogenic strains, this versatile genetic manipulation tool has also been successfully established and applied to other Aspergillus species, including A. carbonarius, A. novofumigatus, and A. terreus, among others [99,100,101,102]. More studies on the development and utilization of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology in Aspergillus are summarized in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. The development and application of the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system in Aspergillus species.
Table 1. The development and application of the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system in Aspergillus species.
SpeciesCas9 ExpressiongRNA ExpressionDelivery
Method		DNA Repair SystemGene Editing TypeEfficiencyReferences
(Selection Marker, Promoter)(Promoter)
AspergillipyrG/argB/hph/ble, tef1gpdAPMTNHEJ1–84 bp deletion or insertionSuccess[63]
AspergilliargB/pyrG, gpdAU6, U3PMTHDRMultiple-gene disruption10–100%[50]
AspergillipyrG, tef1U3PMTHDRgene disruption80%[62]
A. nidulanspyrG, gpdAU3PMTHDRgene activation (gene replacement)Success[76]
A. nigerpyrG/hph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene disruption37.5–100%[53]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene disruptionSuccess[77]
A. nigerhph, tef1gpdAPMTHDRinsertion-deletion mutation100%[52]
A. nigerhph, tef1gpdAPMTNHEJshort insertions or deletions Success[78]
A. nigeramdS, glaAU6PMTNHEL/HDRgene disruption79%[51]
A. nigerpyrG, pkiAtRNA promoterPMTNHEJ/HDRgene disruption/gene replacement13–97%[55]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[80]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[103]
A. nigerhph, tef1tRNA promoterPMTHDRsingle/multiple gene knock-out38–100%[104]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene knock-out100%[105]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro synthesisPMTHDRgene knock-in (base editing)Success[81]
A. nigerRNP PMTHDRsingle/multiple gene knock-out100%[64]
A. niger(rAPOBEC1-nCas9D10A) hph, tef1U6PMTNHEJsingle base editing47.4–100%[57]
A. nigeramdS, glaA5S rRNAPMTNHEJ/HDRgene disruption100%[54]
A. nigerpyrG, glaAU6PMTHDRgene knock-out/knock-in13.5–54.5%[59]
A. nigerhph, glaA5S rRNAPMTHDRgene disruption100%[83]
A. nigerhph, tef1U6PMTHDRgene knock-out/knock-inSuccess[75]
A. nigerRNP PMTNHEJ/HDRgene knock-out/knock-in8.3–37.5%[11]
A. nigerRNP PMTNHEJgene disruptionSuccess[106]
A. nigerpyrG, pkiAtRNAPro1PMTHDRbase editingSuccess[107]
A. nigerhph, tef1U6PMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[82]
A. nigerhph, tef1glutamine (gln) tRNAShock wave /PMTNHEJ/HDRgene disruption/gene knock-inSuccess[74]
A. nigerRNP PMTHDRgene disruption100%[79]
A. nigerpyrG, pkiAtRNAPro1PMTHDRgene knock-outSuccess[108]
A. nigerRNP PMTHDRgene replacement>90%[109]
A. nigerRNP PMTNHEJ/HDRgene knock-outSuccess[84]
A. nigerhph, tef1in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[110]
A. nigerhph, tef1tRNA promoterPMTHDRgene knock-outSuccess[85]
A. oryzaeniaD, amyBU6PMTNHEJ1–22 bp deletion or insertion10–20%[48]
A. oryzaeniaD, amyBU6PMTNHEJ1–23 bp deletion100%[68]
A. oryzaeptrA, amyB/tef1U6PMTHDRSingle/double-gene disruption50–100%[58]
A. oryzaeniaD, amyBU6PMTHDRgene disruptionSuccess[90]
A. oryzaepyrG, TEF1U6PMTHDRgene disruptionSuccess[92]
A. oryzaeRNP PMTHDRgene disruption56–100%[89]
A. oryzaepyrG, TEF1U6PMTHDRPromoter exchangeSuccess[93]
A. fumigatushph, tef1snr52PMTNHEJ/HDRgene disruption25–53%[94]
A. fumigatuspyr4, niiA/gpdAU6-1/2/3 promoters or in vitro transcriptionPMTHDRSingle/double-gene disruption95–100%[26]
A. fumigatuspyrG/hph, tetONgpdAPMTNHEJ/HDRgene disruption/gene replacementSuccess[95]
A. fumigatusRNP PMTHDRgene disruption97%[65]
A. fumigatushph, tef1gpdAPMTHDRbase editingSuccess[111]
A. fumigatusRNP PMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[97]
A. fumigatusRNP PMTHDRgene disruption/gene replacement93%; 10–20%[112]
A. fumigatusRNP PMTHDRgene replacementSuccess[96]
A. fumigatusRNP PMTHDRgene disruption90%[98]
A. carbonariushph, tef1 AMTNHEJ/HDRSingle-gene disruption27%[99]
A. carbonariusRNP PMTHDRgene disruptionSuccess[100]
A. novofumigatuspyrG, tef1gpdAPMTHDRgene disruptionSuccess[101]
A. terreuspyrG, gpdA5S rRNA promoterPMTHDRgene disruption71%[113]
A. lentulusRNP PMTHDRgene knock-inSuccess[102]
RNP, in vitro-assembled Cas9 and gRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes; PMT, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)/CaCl2-mediated protoplast transformation system; AMT, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation system.

4. Conclusions

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a powerful genome editing tool that has been used on a variety of industrially important and pathogenic Aspergillus species, including A. nidulans, A. oryzae, A. niger, and A. fumigatus. However, in order to create effective CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing strategies for Aspergillus species, various restrictions and hurdles must be overcome. Off-target effects generated by Cas9’s non-targeted nuclease activity are a key barrier in genome editing of Aspergillus employing CRISPR technology.
As a result, a variety of strategies are employed to reduce the likelihood of off-target effects. The sgRNA sequence, which is crucial for Cas9 nuclease activity, should be carefully designed to avoid nucleotide mismatches with non-targeted sites in the genome. After successful genome editing, the cas9 gene should be regulated by selecting appropriate promoters to prevent its further expression, or transient expression should be achieved through Cas9/sgRNA RNP complexes assembled in vitro. As a result, off-target effects might be reduced in Aspergillus species by limiting Cas9 expression and activity, designing stable and unique gRNAs. In addition, the efficiency of multi-gene editing in Aspergillus is determined by the design of multiple sgRNA expression cassettes and the efficacy of co-transformation. The development of genome editing technology based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system will dramatically simplify genetic manipulation, and substantially improve the research of functional genes as well as the production of recombinant proteins and natural products in Aspergillus species.

Author Contributions

F.-J.J. and B.-T.W. wrote the main manuscript text. Z.-D.W. and L.J. contributed to certain sections, and P.H. contributed to overall editing and proofreading. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31570107), National Defense Science and Technology Strategic Pilot Project 20-ZLXD-21-03-02-002-03, and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Samson, R.A.; Visagie, C.M.; Houbraken, J.; Hong, S.B.; Hubka, V.; Klaassen, C.H.; Perrone, G.; Seifert, K.A.; Susca, A.; Tanney, J.B.; et al. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 78, 141–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Challacombe, J.F.; Hesse, C.N.; Bramer, L.M.; McCue, L.A.; Lipton, M.; Purvine, S.; Nicora, C.; Gallegos-Graves, V.; Porras-Alfaro, A.; Kuske, C.R. Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kitamoto, K. Cell biology of the Koji mold Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2015, 79, 863–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Nishimura, I.; Shinohara, Y.; Oguma, T.; Koyama, Y. Survival strategy of the salt-tolerant lactic acid bacterium, Tetragenococcus halophilus, to counteract koji mold, Aspergillus oryzae, in soy sauce brewing. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2018, 82, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Papagianni, M. Advances in citric acid fermentation by Aspergillus niger: Biochemical aspects, membrane transport and modeling. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kobayashi, T.; Abe, K.; Asai, K.; Gomi, K.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Kato, M.; Kitamoto, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Machida, M. Genomics of Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 646–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lissau, B.G.; Pedersen, P.B.; Petersen, B.R.; Budolfsen, G. Safety evaluation of a fungal pectinesterase enzyme preparation and its use in food. Food Addit. Contam. 1998, 15, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hama, S.; Tamalampudi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Fukuda, H.; Kondo, A. Preparation and comparative characterization of immobilized Aspergillus oryzae expressing Fusarium heterosporum lipase for enzymatic biodiesel production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 81, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Merz, M.; Eisele, T.; Berends, P.; Appel, D.; Rabe, S.; Blank, I.; Stressler, T.; Fischer, L. Flavourzyme, an Enzyme Preparation with Industrial Relevance: Automated Nine-Step Purification and Partial Characterization of Eight Enzymes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5682–5693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tong, Z.; Zheng, X.; Tong, Y.; Shi, Y.C.; Sun, J. Systems metabolic engineering for citric acid production by Aspergillus niger in the post-genomic era. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yang, L.; Henriksen, M.M.; Hansen, R.S.; Lubeck, M.; Vang, J.; Andersen, J.E.; Bille, S.; Lubeck, P.S. Metabolic engineering of Aspergillus niger via ribonucleoprotein-based CRISPR-Cas9 system for succinic acid production from renewable biomass. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Olempska-Beer, Z.S.; Merker, R.I.; Ditto, M.D.; DiNovi, M.J. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms—A review. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2006, 45, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kumar, A. Aspergillus nidulans: A Potential Resource of the Production of the Native and Heterologous Enzymes for Industrial Applications. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 8894215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Menezes, B.D.; Rossi, D.M.; Squina, F.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Comparative production of xylanase and the liberation of xylooligosaccharides from lignocellulosic biomass by Aspergillus brasiliensis BLf1 and recombinant Aspergillus nidulans XynC A773. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2018, 53, 2110–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yamada, R.; Yoshie, T.; Wakai, S.; Asai-Nakashima, N.; Okazaki, F.; Ogino, C.; Hisada, H.; Tsutsumi, H.; Hata, Y.; Kondo, A. Aspergillus oryzae-based cell factory for direct kojic acid production from cellulose. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kan, E.; Katsuyama, Y.; Maruyama, J.I.; Tamano, K.; Koyama, Y.; Ohnishi, Y. Production of the plant polyketide curcumin in Aspergillus oryzae: Strengthening malonyl-CoA supply for yield improvement. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2019, 83, 1372–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oikawa, H. Heterologous production of fungal natural products: Reconstitution of biosynthetic gene clusters in model host Aspergillus oryzae. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2020, 96, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C.; Minami, A.; Ozaki, T.; Wu, J.; Kawagishi, H.; Maruyama, J.I.; Oikawa, H. Efficient Reconstitution of Basidiomycota Diterpene Erinacine Gene Cluster in Ascomycota Host Aspergillus oryzae Based on Genomic DNA Sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 15519–15523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nagamine, S.; Liu, C.W.; Nishishita, J.; Kozaki, T.; Sogahata, K.; Sato, Y.; Minami, A.; Ozaki, T.; Schmidt-Dannert, C.; Maruyama, J.; et al. Ascomycete Aspergillus oryzae Is an Efficient Expression Host for Production of Basidiomycete Terpenes by Using Genomic DNA Sequences. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2019, 85, e00409-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Frandsen, R.J.N.; Khorsand-Jamal, P.; Kongstad, K.T.; Nafisi, M.; Kannangara, R.M.; Staerk, D.; Okkels, F.T.; Binderup, K.; Madsen, B.; Moller, B.L.; et al. Heterologous production of the widely used natural food colorant carminic acid in Aspergillus nidulans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caesar, L.K.; Kelleher, N.L.; Keller, N.P. In the fungus where it happens: History and future propelling Aspergillus nidulans as the archetype of natural products research. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2020, 144, 103477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Amare, M.G.; Keller, N.P. Molecular mechanisms of Aspergillus flavus secondary metabolism and development. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2014, 66, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bhatnagar, D.; Cary, J.W.; Ehrlich, K.; Yu, J.J.; Cleveland, T.E. Understanding the genetics of regulation of aflatoxin production and Aspergillus flavus development. Mycopathologia 2006, 162, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singh, B.; Singh, S.; Asif, A.R.; Oellerich, M.; Sharma, G.L. Allergic Aspergillosis and the Antigens of Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2014, 15, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muthu, V.; Sehgal, I.S.; Dhooria, S.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Agarwal, R. Utility of recombinant Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 1107–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, C.; Meng, X.; Wei, X.; Lu, L. Highly efficient CRISPR mutagenesis by microhomology-mediated end joining in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 86, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Machida, M.; Asai, K.; Sano, M.; Tanaka, T.; Kumagai, T.; Terai, G.; Kusumoto, K.; Arima, T.; Akita, O.; Kashiwagi, Y.; et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature 2005, 438, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Galagan, J.E.; Calvo, S.E.; Cuomo, C.; Ma, L.J.; Wortman, J.R.; Batzoglou, S.; Lee, S.I.; Basturkmen, M.; Spevak, C.C.; Clutterbuck, J.; et al. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature 2005, 438, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nierman, W.C.; Pain, A.; Anderson, M.J.; Wortman, J.R.; Kim, H.S.; Arroyo, J.; Berriman, M.; Abe, K.; Archer, D.B.; Bermejo, C.; et al. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 2005, 438, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Takahashi, T.; Masuda, T.; Koyama, Y. Enhanced gene targeting frequency in ku70 and ku80 disruption mutants of Aspergillus sojae and Aspergillus oryzae. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2006, 275, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takahashi, T.; Mizutani, O.; Shiraishi, Y.; Yamada, O. Development of an efficient gene-targeting system in Aspergillus luchuensis by deletion of the non-homologous.s end joining system. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jin, F.J.; Maruyama, J.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Arioka, M.; Kitamoto, K. Development of a novel quadruple auxotrophic host transformation system by argB gene disruption using adeA gene and exploiting adenine auxotrophy in Aspergillus oryzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 239, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Vongsangnak, W.; Olsen, P.; Hansen, K.; Krogsgaard, S.; Nielsen, J. Improved annotation through genome-scale metabolic modeling of Aspergillus oryzae. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zhu, L.; Maruyama, J.; Kitamoto, K. Further enhanced production of heterologous proteins by double-gene disruption (DeltaAosedD DeltaAovps10) in a hyper-producing mutant of Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6347–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, X.A.; Ishida, N.; Todaka, N.; Nakamura, R.; Maruyama, J.; Takahashi, H.; Kitamoto, K. Promotion of efficient Saccharification of crystalline cellulose by Aspergillus fumigatus Swo1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2556–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Song, R.; Zhai, Q.; Sun, L.; Huang, E.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, B.; Lu, H. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology in filamentous fungi: Progress and perspective. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6919–6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. DiCarlo, J.E.; Norville, J.E.; Mali, P.; Rios, X.; Aach, J.; Church, G.M. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 4336–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, R.; Chen, L.; Jiang, Y.P.; Zhou, Z.H.; Zou, G. Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Discov. 2015, 1, 15007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Copeland, M.F.; Politz, M.C.; Pfleger, B.F. Application of TALEs, CRISPR/Cas and sRNAs as trans-acting regulators in prokaryotes. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2014, 29, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Stojkovic, M.; Han, D.; Jeong, M.; Stojkovic, P.; Stankovic, K.M. Human induced pluripotent stem cells and CRISPR/Cas-mediated targeted genome editing: Platforms to tackle sensorineural hearing loss. Stem Cells 2021, 39, 673–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shmakov, S.; Smargon, A.; Scott, D.; Cox, D.; Pyzocha, N.; Yan, W.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; et al. Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Costa, F.; Shah, S.A.; Saunders, S.J.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.; Charpentier, E.; Haft, D.H.; et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sander, J.D.; Joung, J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hao, Z.; Su, X. Fast gene disruption in Trichoderma reesei using in vitro assembled Cas9/gRNA complex. BMC Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Matsu-Ura, T.; Baek, M.; Kwon, J.; Hong, C. Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2015, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pohl, C.; Kiel, J.A.; Driessen, A.J.; Bovenberg, R.A.; Nygard, Y. CRISPR/Cas9 Based Genome Editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Katayama, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Okabe, T.; Nakamura, H.; Fujii, W.; Kitamoto, K.; Maruyama, J. Development of a genome editing technique using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the industrial filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hsu, P.D.; Scott, D.A.; Weinstein, J.A.; Ran, F.A.; Konermann, S.; Agarwala, V.; Li, Y.; Fine, E.J.; Wu, X.; Shalem, O.; et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nodvig, C.S.; Hoof, J.B.; Kogle, M.E.; Jarczynska, Z.D.; Lehmbeck, J.; Klitgaard, D.K.; Mortensen, U.H. Efficient oligo nucleotide mediated CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in Aspergilli. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2018, 115, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zheng, X.; Zheng, P.; Sun, J.; Kun, Z.; Ma, Y. Heterologous and endogenous U6 snRNA promoters enable CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing in Aspergillus niger. Fungal. Biol. Biotechnol. 2018, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sarkari, P.; Marx, H.; Blumhoff, M.L.; Mattanovich, D.; Sauer, M.; Steiger, M.G. An efficient tool for metabolic pathway construction and gene integration for Aspergillus niger. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kuivanen, J.; Wang, Y.M.J.; Richard, P. Engineering Aspergillus niger for galactaric acid production: Elimination of galactaric acid catabolism by using RNA sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zheng, X.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, K.; Cairns, T.C.; Meyer, V.; Sun, J.; Ma, Y. 5S rRNA Promoter for Guide RNA Expression Enabled Highly Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Aspergillus niger. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Song, L.; Ouedraogo, J.P.; Kolbusz, M.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Tsang, A. Efficient genome editing using tRNA promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA in Aspergillus niger. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Komor, A.C.; Kim, Y.B.; Packer, M.S.; Zuris, J.A.; Liu, D.R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 2016, 533, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Huang, L.; Dong, H.; Zheng, J.; Wang, B.; Pan, L. Highly efficient single base editing in Aspergillus niger with CRISPR/Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 223–225, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Katayama, T.; Nakamura, H.; Zhang, Y.; Pascal, A.; Fujii, W.; Maruyama, J.I. Forced Recycling of an AMA1-Based Genome-Editing Plasmid Allows for Efficient Multiple Gene Deletion/Integration in the Industrial Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01896-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dong, H.; Zheng, J.; Yu, D.; Wang, B.; Pan, L. Efficient genome editing in Aspergillus niger with an improved recyclable CRISPR-HDR toolbox and its application in introducing multiple copies of heterologous genes. J. Microbiol. Methods 2019, 163, 105655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Deltcheva, E.; Chylinski, K.; Sharma, C.M.; Gonzales, K.; Chao, Y.; Pirzada, Z.A.; Eckert, M.R.; Vogel, J.; Charpentier, E. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 2011, 471, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y. Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 2014, 56, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vanegas, K.G.; Jarczynska, Z.D.; Strucko, T.; Mortensen, U.H. Cpf1 enables fast and efficient genome editing in Aspergilli. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nodvig, C.S.; Nielsen, J.B.; Kogle, M.E.; Mortensen, U.H. A CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genetic Engineering of Filamentous Fungi. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kuivanen, J.; Korja, V.; Holmstrom, S.; Richard, P. Development of microtiter plate scale CRISPR/Cas9 transformation method for Aspergillus niger based on in vitro assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes. Fungal. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Al Abdallah, Q.; Ge, W.; Fortwendel, J.R. A Simple and Universal System for Gene Manipulation in Aspergillus fumigatus: In Vitro-Assembled Cas9-Guide RNA Ribonucleoproteins Coupled with Microhomology Repair Templates. mSphere 2017, 2, e00446-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Takahashi, T.; Jin, F.J.; Koyama, Y. Nonhomologous end-joining deficiency allows large chromosomal deletions to be produced by replacement-type recombination in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tashiro, S.; Futagami, T.; Wada, S.; Kajiwara, Y.; Takashita, H.; Omori, T.; Takahashi, T.; Yamada, O.; Takegawa, K.; Goto, M. Construction of a ligD disruptant for efficient gene targeting in white koji mold, Aspergillus kawachii. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 59, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Nakamura, H.; Katayama, T.; Okabe, T.; Iwashita, K.; Fujii, W.; Kitamoto, K.; Maruyama, J.I. Highly efficient gene targeting in Aspergillus oryzae industrial strains under ligD mutation introduced by genome editing: Strain-specific differences in the effects of deleting EcdR, the negative regulator of sclerotia formation. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Fu, Y.; Foden, J.A.; Khayter, C.; Maeder, M.L.; Reyon, D.; Joung, J.K.; Sander, J.D. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kleinstiver, B.P.; Pattanayak, V.; Prew, M.S.; Tsai, S.Q.; Nguyen, N.T.; Zheng, Z.; Joung, J.K. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 2016, 529, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Xie, S.; Shen, B.; Zhang, C.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y. sgRNAcas9: A software package for designing CRISPR sgRNA and evaluating potential off-target cleavage sites. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shen, C.C.; Hsu, M.N.; Chang, C.W.; Lin, M.W.; Hwu, J.R.; Tu, Y.; Hu, Y.C. Synthetic switch to minimize CRISPR off-target effects by self-restricting Cas9 transcription and translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Kwon, M.J.; Schutze, T.; Spohner, S.; Haefner, S.; Meyer, V. Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Rojas-Sanchez, U.; Lopez-Calleja, A.C.; Millan-Chiu, B.E.; Fernandez, F.; Loske, A.M.; Gomez-Lim, M.A. Enhancing the yield of human erythropoietin in Aspergillus niger by introns and CRISPR-Cas9. Protein Expr. Purif. 2020, 168, 105570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dong, L.; Lin, X.; Yu, D.; Huang, L.; Wang, B.; Pan, L. High-level expression of highly active and thermostable trehalase from Myceliophthora thermophila in Aspergillus niger by using the CRISPR/Cas9 tool and its application in ethanol fermentation. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 47, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Roux, I.; Woodcraft, C.; Hu, J.; Wolters, R.; Gilchrist, C.L.M.; Chooi, Y.H. CRISPR-Mediated Activation of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters for Bioactive Molecule Discovery in Filamentous Fungi. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 1843–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kuivanen, J.; Arvas, M.; Richard, P. Clustered Genes Encoding 2-Keto-l-Gulonate Reductase and l-Idonate 5-Dehydrogenase in the Novel Fungal d-Glucuronic Acid Pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kuivanen, J.; Richard, P. NADPH-dependent 5-keto-D-gluconate reductase is a part of the fungal pathway for D-glucuronate catabolism. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nan, Y.; Ouyang, L.; Chu, J. In vitro CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing of Aspergillus niger based on removable bidirectional selection marker AmdS. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021, 68, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cairns, T.C.; Feurstein, C.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, L.H.; Zheng, P.; Sun, J.; Meyer, V. Functional exploration of co-expression networks identifies a nexus for modulating protein and citric acid titres in Aspergillus niger submerged culture. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Alazi, E.; Niu, J.; Otto, S.B.; Arentshorst, M.; Pham, T.T.M.; Tsang, A.; Ram, A.F.J. W361R mutation in GaaR, the regulator of D-galacturonic acid-responsive genes, leads to constitutive production of pectinases in Aspergillus niger. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e00732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Dong, L.; Yu, D.; Lin, X.; Wang, B.; Pan, L. Improving expression of thermostable trehalase from Myceliophthora sepedonium in Aspergillus niger mediated by the CRISPR/Cas9 tool and its purification, characterization. Protein Expr. Purif. 2020, 165, 105482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, L.; Zheng, X.; Cairns, T.C.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, D.; Zheng, P.; Sun, J. Disruption or reduced expression of the orotidine-5’-decarboxylase gene pyrG increases citric acid production: A new discovery during recyclable genome editing in Aspergillus niger. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Perez-Cantero, A.; Martin-Vicente, A.; Guarro, J.; Fortwendel, J.R.; Capilla, J. Analysis of the cyp51 genes contribution to azole resistance in Aspergillus section Nigri with the CRISPR-Cas9 technique. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e01996-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Seekles, S.J.; van Dam, J.; Arentshorst, M.; Ram, A.F.J. Natural Variation and the Role of Zn2Cys6 Transcription Factors SdrA, WarA and WarB in Sorbic Acid Resistance of Aspergillus niger. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jin, F.J.; Hu, S.; Wang, B.T.; Jin, L. Advances in Genetic Engineering Technology and Its Application in the Industrial Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 644404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maruyama, J.I. Genome Editing Technology and Its Application Potentials in the Industrial Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jin, F.J.; Nishida, M.; Hara, S.; Koyama, Y. Identification and characterization of a putative basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor involved in the early stage of conidiophore development in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zou, G.; Xiao, M.; Chai, S.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z. Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungi via an improved CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein method facilitated by chemical reagents. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 2343–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huynh, H.H.; Morita, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Katayama, T.; Miyakawa, T.; Tanokura, M.; Chiba, Y.; Shinkura, R.; Maruyama, J.I. Functional production of human antibody by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal. Biol. Biotechnol. 2020, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Long, C.; He, B.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, C.; Zeng, B. Identification and functional characterization of glycerol dehydrogenase reveal the role in kojic acid synthesis in Aspergillus oryzae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Anantayanon, J.; Jeennor, S.; Panchanawaporn, S.; Chutrakul, C.; Laoteng, K. Significance of two intracellular triacylglycerol lipases of Aspergillus oryzae in lipid mobilization: A perspective in industrial implication for microbial lipid production. Gene 2021, 793, 145745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chutrakul, C.; Panchanawaporn, S.; Jeennor, S.; Anantayanon, J.; Laoteng, K. Promoter exchange of the cryptic nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene for oligopeptide production in Aspergillus oryzae. J. Microbiol. 2022, 60, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fuller, K.K.; Chen, S.; Loros, J.J.; Dunlap, J.C. Development of the CRISPR/Cas9 System for Targeted Gene Disruption in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2015, 14, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Weber, J.; Valiante, V.; Nodvig, C.S.; Mattern, D.J.; Slotkowski, R.A.; Mortensen, U.H.; Brakhage, A.A. Functional Reconstitution of a Fungal Natural Product Gene Cluster by Advanced Genome Editing. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Arai, T.; Umeyama, T.; Majima, H.; Inukai, T.; Watanabe, A.; Miyazaki, Y.; Kamei, K. Hmg1 mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus and their contribution to triazole susceptibility. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 980–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rybak, J.M.; Ge, W.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Parker, J.E.; Kelly, S.L.; Rogers, P.D.; Fortwendel, J.R. Mutations in hmg1, Challenging the Paradigm of Clinical Triazole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 2019, 10, e00437-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Souza, A.C.O.; Martin-Vicente, A.; Nywening, A.V.; Ge, W.; Lowes, D.J.; Peters, B.M.; Fortwendel, J.R. Loss of Septation Initiation Network (SIN) kinases blocks tissue invasion and unlocks echinocandin cidal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Weyda, I.; Yang, L.; Vang, J.; Ahring, B.K.; Lubeck, M.; Lubeck, P.S. A comparison of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and protoplast-mediated transformation with CRISPR-Cas9 and bipartite gene targeting substrates, as effective gene targeting tools for Aspergillus carbonarius. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 135, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ferrara, M.; Gallo, A.; Cervini, C.; Gambacorta, L.; Solfrizzo, M.; Baker, S.E.; Perrone, G. Evidence of the Involvement of a Cyclase Gene in the Biosynthesis of Ochratoxin A in Aspergillus carbonarius. Toxins 2021, 13, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Matsuda, Y.; Bai, T.; Phippen, C.B.W.; Nodvig, C.S.; Kjaerbolling, I.; Vesth, T.C.; Andersen, M.R.; Mortensen, U.H.; Gotfredsen, C.H.; Abe, I.; et al. Novofumigatonin biosynthesis involves a non-heme iron-dependent endoperoxide isomerase for orthoester formation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Tateno, M.; Umeyama, T.; Inukai, T.; Takatsuka, S.; Hoshino, Y.; Yamagoe, S.; Yamagata Murayama, S.; Ishino, K.; Miyazaki, Y. Examination of Cyp51A-Mediated Azole Resistance in Aspergillus lentulus Using CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing. Med. Mycol. J. 2022, 21-00024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cairns, T.C.; Feurstein, C.; Zheng, X.; Zheng, P.; Sun, J.; Meyer, V. A quantitative image analysis pipeline for the characterization of filamentous fungal morphologies as a tool to uncover targets for morphology engineering: A case study using aplD in Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. van Leeuwe, T.M.; Arentshorst, M.; Ernst, T.; Alazi, E.; Punt, P.J.; Ram, A.F.J. Efficient marker free CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for functional analysis of gene families in filamentous fungi. Fungal. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Leynaud-Kieffer, L.M.C.; Curran, S.C.; Kim, I.; Magnuson, J.K.; Gladden, J.M.; Baker, S.E.; Simmons, B.A. A new approach to Cas9-based genome editing in Aspergillus niger that is precise, efficient and selectable. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sui, Y.F.; Schutze, T.; Ouyang, L.M.; Lu, H.; Liu, P.; Xiao, X.; Qi, J.; Zhuang, Y.P.; Meyer, V. Engineering cofactor metabolism for improved protein and glucoamylase production in Aspergillus niger. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kun, R.S.; Meng, J.; Salazar-Cerezo, S.; Makela, M.R.; de Vries, R.P.; Garrigues, S. CRISPR/Cas9 facilitates rapid generation of constitutive forms of transcription factors in Aspergillus niger through specific on-site genomic mutations resulting in increased saccharification of plant biomass. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 136, 109508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Garrigues, S.; Kun, R.S.; de Vries, R.P. Genetic barcodes allow traceability of CRISPR/Cas9-derived Aspergillus niger strains without affecting their fitness. Curr. Genet. 2021, 67, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yoshioka, I.; Kirimura, K. Rapid and marker-free gene replacement in citric acid-producing Aspergillus tubingensis (A. niger) WU-2223L by the CRISPR/Cas9 system-based genome editing technique using DNA fragments encoding sgRNAs. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2021, 131, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cairns, T.C.; Zheng, X.; Feurstein, C.; Zheng, P.; Sun, J.; Meyer, V. A Library of Aspergillus niger Chassis Strains for Morphology Engineering Connects Strain Fitness and Filamentous Growth With Submerged Macromorphology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 820088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ballard, E.; Weber, J.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Tammireddy, S.; Whitfield, P.D.; Brakhage, A.A.; Brown, A.J.P.; Verweij, P.E.; Warris, A. Recreation of in-host acquired single nucleotide polymorphisms by CRISPR-Cas9 reveals an uncharacterised gene playing a role in Aspergillus fumigatus azole resistance via a non-cyp51A mediated resistance mechanism. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 130, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. van Rhijn, N.; Furukawa, T.; Zhao, C.; McCann, B.L.; Bignell, E.; Bromley, M.J. Development of a marker-free mutagenesis system using CRISPR-Cas9 in the pathogenic mould Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2020, 145, 103479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yao, G.; Chen, X.; Han, Y.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J. Development of versatile and efficient genetic tools for the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus RA2905. Curr. Genet. 2022, 68, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, F.-J.; Wang, B.-T.; Wang, Z.-D.; Jin, L.; Han, P. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application in Aspergillus Species. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050467

AMA Style

Jin F-J, Wang B-T, Wang Z-D, Jin L, Han P. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application in Aspergillus Species. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(5):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Feng-Jie, Bao-Teng Wang, Zhen-Dong Wang, Long Jin, and Pei Han. 2022. "CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing and Its Application in Aspergillus Species" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 5: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop