Next Article in Journal
Exposure of Aspergillus fumigatus to Klebsiella pneumoniae Culture Filtrate Inhibits Growth and Stimulates Gliotoxin Production
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Pneumocystis and Morphological Description of Fungal Distribution and Severity of Infection in Thirty-Six Mammal Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Resistance of Black Aspergilli Species from Grape Vineyards to SDHI, QoI, DMI, and Phenylpyrrole Fungicides

by
Stefanos I. Testempasis
* and
George S. Karaoglanidis
Laboratory of Plant Pathology, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 269, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020221
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Pathogenesis and Disease Control)

Abstract

:
Fungicide applications constitute a management practice that reduces the size of fungal populations and by acting as a genetic drift factor, may affect pathogen evolution. In a previous study, we showed that the farming system influenced the population structure of the Aspergillus section Nigri species in Greek vineyards. The current study aimed to test the hypothesis that the differences in the population structure may be associated with the selection of fungicide-resistant strains within the black aspergilli populations. To achieve this, we determined the sensitivity of 102, 151, 19, and 22 for the A. uvarum, A. tubingensis, A. niger, and A. carbonarious isolates, respectively, originating either from conventionally-treated or organic vineyards to the fungicides fluxapyroxad-SDHIs, pyraclostrobin-QoIs, tebuconazole-DMIs, and fludioxonil-phenylpyrroles. The results showed widespread resistance to all four fungicides tested in the A. uvarum isolates originating mostly from conventional vineyards. In contrast, all the A. tubingensis isolates tested were sensitive to pyraclostrobin, while moderate frequencies of only lowly resistant isolates were identified for tebuconazole, fludioxonil, and fluxapyroxad. Sequencing analysis of the corresponding fungicide target encoding genes revealed the presence of H270Y, H65Q/S66P, and G143A mutations in the sdhB, sdhD, and cytb genes of A. uvarum resistant isolates, respectively. No mutations in the Cyp51A and Cyp51B genes were detected in either the A. uvarum or A. tubingensis isolates exhibiting high or low resistance levels to DMIs, suggesting that other resistance mechanisms are responsible for the observed phenotype. Our results support the initial hypothesis for the contribution of fungicide resistance in the black aspergilli population structure in conventional and organic vineyards, while this is the first report of A. uvarum resistance to SDHIs and the first documentation of H270Y or H65Q/S66P mutations in sdhB, sdhD, and of the G143A mutation in the cytb gene of this fungal species.

1. Introduction

Grape vine yield and the quality of grape products is affected by a long series of biotic and abiotic factors. Among them, pathogens affecting berries as either pre- or postharvest spoilage agents are the most important. Aspergillus species belonging to Aspergillus section Nigri, known also as black aspergilli, are among the most important pre-or postharvest spoilage agents causing a disease known as Aspergillus rot [1]. The presence of black aspergilli has been reported throughout the world, particularly in vineyards grown under hot and dry conditions [2,3,4].
Currently, Aspergillus section Nigri includes, in total, 30 species that have been isolated from grapes and among them, the biseriate A. carbonarius, A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. brasieliensis and the uniseriate A. uvarum, A. japonicus, and A. aculeatus are the most important [5,6,7,8]. Among these species, of great concern are those producing mycotoxins, with ochratoxin A (OTA) and fumonisins (FB1, FB2, and FB4) being the most common in wines, raisins, and other grape products. OTA is produced by a species of Aspergillus section Circumdati and Aspergillus section Nigri group, with A. carbonarious being the main OTA producer on grapes and grape products, while strains of A. niger can also produce the same mycotoxin, but to a lower extent [9]. In grapes, fumonisin contamination has been associated with A. niger [10]. In addition to the quantitative or qualitative losses to grape yield, some of the above-mentioned Aspergillus section Nigri species such as A. niger, A. tubingensis, or A. uvarum are associated with pulmonary aspergillosis and otomycosis in humans or domestic and wild animals [11,12,13].
Efforts to reduce the risk for Aspergillus infections on grapes and the mycotoxin contamination of grape products have focused on attempts to prevent fungal growth on grapes, since berry infection by these opportunistic pathogens occur in the vineyard from veraison to harvest. This has been recognized as the most effective tactic, and several natural fungicides (i.e., fusopyrone, perillaldehyde, natamycin) or biological control agents (i.e., Aureobasidium pullullans, Candida spp., Lanchacea thermotolerans) have been evaluated both in vitro and in vineyards against Aspergillus spp. [9,14,15]. However, conventional fungicides have been evaluated and used as the main tool to prevent the growth of black aspergilli on grapes. Fungicides containing the phenylpyrrole derivative fludioxonil have been shown to be the most effective in reducing the black aspergilli incidence on grapes [1,16,17], while members of other fungicide groups such as quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs), sterol demethylation inhibitors (DMIs), or anilinopyrimidines may reduce Aspergillus spp. incidence and mycotoxin production at lower rates [17].
Throughout the world, vineyards represent agroecosystems heavily treated with fungicides that are applied to protect vines and berries from several important foliar or fruit diseases. Major target site-specific fungicide groups registered for use in Greek vineyards against grape diseases include sterol demethylation inhibitors (DMIs), (flutriafol, difenoconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, myclobutanil), quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs), (azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, pyraclostrobin), succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs), (boscalid, fluopyram, fluxapyroxad), anilinopyrimidines (pyrimethanil, cyprodinil), and phenylpyrroles (fludioxonil). Most of these fungicides are used against diseases such as powdery mildew, downy mildew, or Botrytis bunch rot. However, although they are not used primarily against black aspergilli, the fungal populations may be exposed to selection pressure even as non-targets of the applications. However, this intensive fungicide use imposes the risk of resistance development by pathogens exposed to the selection pressure in the vineyard environment [18,19,20].
Until recently, fungicide resistance studies in black aspergilli have mainly focused on species of medical importance such as A. fumigatus. It is a saprophytic fungus living in the soil but its airborne spores may infect humans, causing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis or invasive aspergillosis [21]. The development of resistance by this fungal species to azole (DMIs) fungicides is a major concern and for several years, it has been recognized that the selection of resistant strains may occur due to fungal exposure to agricultural DMIs applied against plant pathogens [22,23]. In contrast to A. fumigatus, reports on fungicide resistance development by black aspergilli associated with Aspergillus rot of grape are sparse. Only recently were the first cases of resistant selection reported in the U.S. by Cosseboom and Hu [24], who provided evidence for the selection of F129L mutants conferring resistance to QoIs in A. uvarum isolated from grapes.
In a recent study aiming to determine the population structure of Aspergillus section Nigri species, it was found that the farming system (conventional vs. organic vineyards) may significantly affect both the frequency of Aspergillus presence on the bunches and the fungal composition at the species level [25]. In detail, our experimental data showed that in conventionally-treated vineyards, the predominant Aspergillus section Nigri species was A. uvarum, while in organic vineyards, A. tubingensis dominated the population. Factors contributing to those differences in population structure in vineyards cultivated with different cropping systems remain largely unknown. Therefore, this study was initiated to test the hypothesis that differences in the frequency of black aspergilli on grape bunches and population structure may be due to the selection of fungicide-resistant strains in conventionally treated vineyards. To test this hypothesis, the sensitivity of A. uvarum, A. tubingensis, A. niger, and A. carbonarious isolated from organic and conventionally-treated vineyards to the DMI tebuconazole, the SDHI fluxapyroxad, the QoI pyraclostrobin, and the phenylpyrrole fludioxnil was measured. In the course of the study, moderate to high frequencies of resistance to SDHIs and QoIs were observed within the A. uvarum fraction of the population tested and for these fungicide classes, the molecular mechanisms of resistance were investigated in the resistant isolates by sequencing the respective target genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolates

A total of 102, 151, 19, and 22 isolates of A. uvarum, A.tubingensis, A. niger, and A. carbonarius, respectively, were tested in this study. The isolates were collected from vineyards throughout Greece for the requirements of a study aiming to explore the impact of the cropping system (conventional vs. organic) on the incidence of black aspergilli species and the associated population structure [25]. The identification of the collected isolates of Aspergillus section Nigri species was performed by the sequence analysis of three (3) reference genes (ITS, β-tubulin, and calmodulin), [25]. The isolates were maintained on acidified potato dextrose agar (PDA, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 4 °C until use. Detailed information on the number of isolates per species and cropping system is provided in Table S1.

2.2. Fungicides

Fungicides used in the study were selected among the main groups of single-site inhibitors registered for use in Greek vineyards against foliar or bunch diseases. The commercial formulations of fludioxonil (Geoxe 50 WG, Syngenta, Basel, Switzerland), fluxapyroxad (Sercadis 30 SC, BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), fluopyram (Luna Privilege 50 SC, Bayer CropScience, Leverkusen, Germany), boscalid (Cantus 50 WG, BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), pyraclostrobin (Insignia 20 WG, BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), isofetamid (Kenja 40 SC, Agrology Papaoikonomou, Thessaloniki, Greece), penthiopyrad (Fontelis 20 SC, Corteva AgriScience, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and tebuconazole (Folicur 25 WG, Bayer CropScience, Leverkusen, Germany) were used in the sensitivity assays.

2.3. Fungicide Sensitivity Measurements

The sensitivity of the collected isolates of each Aspergillus species (A. uvarum, A. tubingensis, A. carbonarius, and A. niger) to the selected fungicides was determined using a range of different concentrations. Details on the concentrations of fluxapyroxad, fludioxonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole are provided in Table S2.
Fungicide sensitivity assessments were based on the measurement of mycelial growth inhibition for fluxapyroxad, fludioxonil, and tebuconazole or conidia germination inhibition for pyraclostrobin. In the study, different culture media were used to determine the fungicide sensitivity since the growth media should promote both fungal growth and fungicide activity. To determine sensitivities to fludioxonil, tebuconazole, and fluxapyroxad, conidia were harvested by sterile cotton swabs from three-day-old culture of each isolate and transferred into an Eppendorf tube (1.5 mL) containing 1 mL of sterile distilled water to re-suspend the conidia. Afterward, the spore suspension was incorporated into a 90 mm Petri dish with 15 mL of PDA and mixed thoroughly. Cultures were incubated in a growth chamber for 48–72 h (27 °C, dark). Then, mycelial plugs were transferred using a 6 mm core borer onto Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640) agar plates (RPMI-1640 Agar with MOPS and two glucose/without sodium bicarbonate, Himedia, Mumbai, India), amended with a range of fluxapyroxad or fludioxonil concentrations or on PDA plates amended with several concentrations of tebuconazole (Table S2). The cultures were incubated at 27 °C in the dark for three (3) days, and then, the diameter of the colonies was measured. Sensitivities to pyraclostrobin were estimated by plating aliquots (30 μL) of the conidia suspension (1 × 104 conidia mL−1) of each isolate with a sterile colony spreader on a 2% water agar (WA) medium amended with several concentrations of pyraclostrobin (Table S2) and 100 mg L−1 of salihydroxamic acid (SHAM, Sigma Co., Saint Louis, MO, USA) to inhibit the alternative oxidation pathway. The conidia were incubated for 18 h at 27 °C in the dark, and then the number of germinated conidia was measured microscopically. A conidium was considered as germinated when its length was twice the length of the condium. Each isolate was tested in triplicate, while the control cultures for each fungal isolate were cultivated on the respective media (PDA, WA, and RPMI-1640 agar) without any fungicide.

2.4. DNA Extraction

Mycelia plugs from the three day-old cultures were transferred into 100 mL culture flasks containing 30 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB, Neogen, Scotland, UK). Cultures were incubated for 7 days (25 °C, dark), and the produced mycelia were harvested by filtration and lyophilized. DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.5. Fungicide Target Gene Amplification Associated with Resistance to SDHIs, QoIs, and DMIs

To investigate the presence of target site mutations associated with resistance to the tested fungicides, the sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, Cyp51A, Cyp51B, and cytb genes of the A. uvarum and A. tubingensis isolates were amplified and sequenced. Primers were designed based on published sequences of the targeted genes of A. uvarum and A. tubingensis strains or other Aspergillus species (Table S3). The sequences were mapped to the reference genomes of A. uvarum (Genbank Accession GCA_003184745.1) and A. tubingensis (Genbank Accession GCA_001890745), while primer pairs were generated using the Geneious Prime® 2022.1.1 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) software.
PCR reactions were carried out using the polymerase KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche Sequencing Store Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA). Reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL 2X KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix buffer, 8 μL of molecular biology grade water (PanReac AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), 3 μL of genomic DNA (10 ng/μL), and 0.75 μL of each primer (10 μM primer stocks). The PCR cycling protocol used was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (98 °C for 20 s), annealing (15 s at the respective annealing temperature), and elongation (1 or 2 min at 72 °C; depending on the amplicon’s size). The final cycle was followed by an extension (1 min at 72 °C) and a hold step at 4 °C. Detailed information on the primer’s sequence, annealing temperatures, and amplicon sizes are presented in Table 1. PCR product purification was performed using the Monarch PCR and DNA Clean-Up Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, while Sanger sequencing analysis was conducted at Azenta/GENEWIZ (Azenta Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA). Sequences were processed and aligned using the Geneious Prime®® 2022.1.1 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) software.

2.6. Cross-Resistance Relationships between SDHI Fungicides

The sensitivity of the isolates with single or/and double sdh mutations to several SDHIs (fluxapyroxad, boscalid, penthiopyrad, isofetamid, and fluopyram) was tested by measuring the inhibition of the spores’ germ tube length. In total, four (4) isolates (A137, A127, B7, and B9) with the H270Y mutation in the sdhB subunit, five (5) isolates (B14, A67, A69, A121, and B144) possessing the H65Q/P66S mutations in the sdhD subunit, three (3) isolates (B10, B11, and B12), possessing all three sdh mutations, and three (3) isolates that were sensitive to all of the tested fungicides were included in the study. The fungicide concentrations used were 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 50 mg L−1. Aliquots (30 μL) of the conidia suspension of each isolate (1 × 104 conidia mL−1) were plated with a sterile colony spreader on RPMI-1640 agar medium amended or not with each fungicide concentration. Cultures were incubated for 18 h in a growth chamber (27 °C, dark) and after the end of the incubation period, the length of the germination tube was measured in 50 conidia per isolate and fungicide concentration.

2.7. Data Analysis

The effective concentration at which mycelial growth, conidia germination, and the length of the germination tube was inhibited by 50% (EC50) was calculated by plotting the relative inhibition against the Log10 of fungicide concentrations. EC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism, version 9.4.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), while the resistance factors (RFs) were estimated by dividing the EC50 value for each isolate by the mean EC50 values of the most sensitive isolates. The RF values were used to characterize the resistance phenotype. In particular, isolates with RF < 2 were classified as sensitive (S), whereas isolates with RF > 2 were assigned as low resistant (LR). Highly resistant (HR) isolates were those whose growth was not inhibited, even at the highest tested dosages.

3. Results

3.1. Fungicide Sensitivity of Different Black Aspergilli Species

Sensitivity measurements to the selected fungicides revealed that the four black aspergilli species tested were considerably differentiated in their fungicide sensitivity profile (Table 2). A. uvarum and A. tubingensis isolates showed a lower sensitivity to most of the fungicides compared to that of A. niger and A. carbonarius. In A. uvarum, highly resistant (HR) isolates were detected against all four fungicides tested. The higher frequencies of highly resistant isolates were detected against fluxapyroxad and pyraclostrobin (17 and 16 out of 102 A. uvarum isolates, respectively) (Table 2). In contrast, the number of A. uvarum isolates that were highly resistant to tebuconazole or fludioxonil was lower (six and two isolates out of 102, respectively). Furthermore, a relatively high fraction of the A. uvarum isolates was of low resistance (LR) to fluxapyroxad (33 out of 102 isolates) and to fludioxonil (44 out of 102 isolates). In A. tubingensis, high resistance was detected only against fludioxonil in the limited number of four out of 151 isolates, while all of them were sensitive to pyraclostrobin. However, a significant fraction of the tested A. tubingensis population was found to be of low resistance to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, and fludioxonil with 31, 58, and 22 isolates out of 151, respectively.
The entire set of A. niger isolates was highly sensitive to fluxapyroxad, pyraclostrobin, and fludioxonil with RF values lower than 2, while for tebuconazole, only a small fraction of the A. niger isolates showed low resistance levels with RF values ranging from 2.1 to 5.3, with the remaining being highly sensitive (Table 2). Similarly, the entire set of A. carbonariοus isolates tested was highly sensitive to pyraclostrobin, with RF values ranging from 0 to 1.2. In contrast, all 22 A. carbonarious isolates tested were found to be insensitive to fluxapyroxad, since no inhibition of mycelial growth was observed, even at the highest concentration tested of 20 μg mL−1 in any of the isolates. Even though most of the A. carbonarious isolates were sensitive to tebuconazole (n = 14) and fludioxonil (n = 20), few LR isolates were identified with RF values ranging from 2.2 to 5.1 and from 2 to 4.5, respectively (Table 2).

3.2. Frequencies of S, LR, and HR Isolates Based on the Farming System

The frequencies of sensitive (S), lowly resistant (LR), and highly resistant (HR) isolates of A. uvarum and A. tubingensis species to each fungicide tested were calculated based on their farming system of origin (Figure 1). Within the A. uvarum subpopulation, the number of isolates originating from conventional vineyards (n = 79) or organic vineyards (n = 23) was uneven, since A. uvarum isolated in low frequencies from organic vineyards. In contrast, the numbers of A. tubingensis isolates originating from either conventional (n = 76) or organic vineyards (n = 75) were equal. Isolates of A. carbonarious and A. niger were not included in this comparison due to the limited number of isolates obtained. Marked differences were observed in the frequencies of isolates of A. uvarum with different sensitivity levels to fluxapyroxad, based on their origin. All of the highly fluxapyroxad-resistant A. uvarum isolates (n = 17) originated from conventional vineyards (Figure 1A). In contrast, no differences were observed in the frequency of fluxapyroxad lowly resistant isolates of A. tubingensis, which was detected in the frequency of 21% within each group (Figure 1B). Regarding pyraclostrobin, highly resistant isolates (n = 16) were detected only in A. uvarum, while the A. tubingensis subpopulation was highly sensitive. Thirteen out of 16 A. uvarum highly resistant isolates originated from conventional vineyards, while only three originated from organic vineyards. Their frequencies within each subpopulation were not significantly different because of the uneven sample size (Figure 1A). Isolates highly resistant to fludioxonil were detected in both A. uvarum and A. tubingensis subpopulations originating only from the conventional vineyards, but their number was too low (two and four isolates, respectively). In the A. tubingensis subpopulation, isolates with a low resistance to fludioxonil were observed in balanced frequencies in the conventionally and organically treated vineyards with a value of 15.5% (Figure 1B). Isolates with low resistance levels to fludioxonil were also detected in the A. uvarum subpopulation, but in this case, the frequency of low resistant isolates originating from conventionally-treated vineyards was significantly higher compared to that in the organic vineyards (Figure 1A). Regarding tebuconazole, highly resistant isolates were only detected in the A. uvarum subpopulation but in very low numbers, evenly split from the conventionally treated and organic vineyards. In the A. tubingensis subpopulation, only isolates with low resistance levels to tebuconazole were detected, and their frequencies within the subpopulations originating from either conventionally-treated or organic vineyards were similar (Figure 1B).

3.3. Molecular Characterization of SDHI-, QoI- and DMI-Resistant Isolates

To determine whether the observed resistance phenotypes were associated with the presence of mutations in the fungicide target genes, sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, Cyp51, and cytb genes of A. uvarum, sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, and Cyp51 of A. tubingensis, and sdhB, sdhC, and sdhD of A. carbonarious were amplified and sequenced. The sequencing of sdhB, sdhC, and sdhD encoding genes in A. uvarum revealed that 11 isolates (26.2 %) possessed a histidine (CAC) replacement by tyrosine (TAC) at codon 270 of sdhB (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Furthermore, in 15 (35.7%) A. uvarum isolates, a double mutation (H65Q/S66P) was detected in the sdhD subunit (Figure 2). The H65Q/S66P mutations are caused by the replacement of histidine (CAC) by glutamine (CAA) at codon 65 and of proline (CCC) by serine (TCC) at codon 66 of sdhD (Figure 4). Interestingly, in a limited number (n = 5, 11.9%) of the sequenced isolates, the identified mutations H270Υ in sdhB and H65Q/S66P in sdhD co-occurred (Figure 2). No mutation was detected in the sdhB, sdhC, and sdhD subunits in any of the 31 A. tubingensis isolates showing low levels of resistance to fluxapyroxad. Similarly, no mutation in any of the three (3) sdh subunits sequenced was observed in the A. carbonarious isolates that were found to be resistant to fluxapyroxad.
The measurements of sensitivity to the QoI pyrasclostrobin revealed the presence of a resistant population fraction only in A. uvarum, while in all three (3) remaining fungal species tested, all of the isolates were highly sensitive. Sequencing analysis of the cytb gene in the QoI-resistant A. uvarum isolates showed the presence of a mutation leading to the substitution of glycine (GGT) to alanine (GCT) at codon 143 (G143A) (Figure 5). All of the A. uvarum QoI-resistant isolates (n = 16, 100%) possessed this mutation (Figure 2). Albeit several LR and HR strains were identified in the populations of all four (4) Aspergillus spp. tested, sequencing analysis of the Cyp51A and Cyp51B encoding genes revealed the absence of any target mutation in the resistant strains. The sequences of the sdhB, sdhD, and cytb genes of the SDHI- or QoI-resistant isolates of A. uvarum possessing the H270Y, H65Q/P66S, or G143A mutations have been submitted to the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and the respective accession numbers are presented in Table S4.

3.4. Cross-Resistance Relationships between SDHIs

The sensitivity data of several SDHI molecules used in vineyards against fungal pathogens in the mutated and wild-type A. uvarum isolates are summarized in Table 3, while the response of the conidia of representative isolates, grown on different fungicide concentrations, is shown in Figure 6. Results showed a slight variation regarding the intrinsic activity of the fungicides tested against the A. uvarum isolates of wild-type sensitivity, with mean EC50 values ranging from 0.003 μg mL−1 for fluxapyroxad, which was the most active molecule, to 0.019 μg mL−1 for penthiopyrad, which was the least active among the five (5) SDHI molecules included in the study.
All of the isolates possessing the H270Y mutation were either moderately- or highly-resistant to fluxapyroxad, boscalid, and penthiopyrad, with RF values ranging from 50.5 to 208, 195 to 298, and 20.7 to 174, respectively. In contrast, none of the H270Y mutants were resistant to either isofetamid or fluopyram. The double mutation identified in the sdhD subunit (H65Q/P66S) was associated with only low resistance levels to all five SDHI molecules tested with RF values ranging from 5–15.3, 11.8–44.1, 2.7–5.7, 3.7–28.1 to 14.2–55.3 for fluxapyroxad, boscalid, penthiopyrad, isofetamid and fluopyram, respectively. The isolates possessing both the H270Y mutation in sdhB and the double substitution H65Q/P66S in sdhD had a sensitivity phenotype similar to that described previously for the H270Y mutants, exhibiting moderate to high resistance to fluxapyroxad, boscalid, and penthiopyrad while they were highly sensitive to isofetamid and fluopyram.

4. Discussion

This study was initiated primarily to investigate whether the differences in the frequency of the presence of black aspergilli and species composition between conventionally-treated and organic vineyards are related to the possible development of resistance to chemical fungicides used in vineyards. To achieve this, the sensitivity of a large set of black aspergilli isolates belonging to several species and originating from either conventionally- or organically-treated vineyards was measured by calculating the EC50 values after exposure to several commonly used fungicides in vineyards. Vineyards represent, throughout the world, an environment heavily treated with fungicides applied to combat several foliar and bunch diseases [26]. Even though there are numerous studies aiming to determine the fungicide sensitivity profile of important grapevine pathogens such as Plasmopara viticola, Erysiphe necator, or Botrytis cinerea [18,21], the information regarding the fungicide sensitivity status of black aspergilli populations originating from vineyards is very limited [27]. Therefore, this study represents the first report on the fungicide sensitivity levels of major black aspergilli species associated with the Aspergillus bunch rot of grapes.
In a previous study by our group, it was found that in conventionally-treated vineyards, the incidence of black aspergilli at harvest was higher compared to that in organic vineyards located in the same region and cultivated with the same varieties as conventionally-treated vineyards [25]. Furthermore, in the conventionally treated vineyards, the predominant Aspergillus species was A. uvarum, while in the respective organic vineyards, A. tubingensis was found to be the predominant species [25]. In accordance with these findings, previous reports showed a lower incidence of black aspergilli in organic vineyards compared to those conventionally treated [28], or a lower risk for mycotoxin contamination in wines originating from organic vineyards compared to those from conventionally-treated vineyards [29]. Interestingly, similar findings of higher frequencies of mycotoxigenic Fusarium spp. have been observed in conventionally-treated cereal fields compared to the respective frequencies in organic fields [30,31]. Such differences had been attributed to changes in the saprophytic microflora of the conventionally treated plants or differences in the canopy microclimate. However, no data have been provided on the fungicide resistance status of the fungal populations from either conventional or organic farming systems that could explain the observed differences.
Monitoring data showed that within the A. uvarum population sampled, which was the predominant species in the conventionally treated vineyards, relatively high frequencies of resistance to the respiration inhibitors fluxapyroxad (SDHIs) and pyraclostrobin (QoIs) occurred. Interestingly, almost all of the A. uvarum isolates exhibiting high resistance levels to fluxapyroxad or pyraclostrobin originated from conventionally treated vineyards. These two fungicide classes are currently the most commonly used in vineyards against the main grape diseases; thus, black aspergilli populations are heavily exposed to selection pressure even if they are not always the target of these fungicide applications. Similarly, the few isolates of A. uvarum or A. tubingensis that were found to be highly resistant to fludioxonil were all obtained from the conventionally-treated fields. However, marked differences were observed between the two species in the frequencies of isolates with low resistance levels to this fungicide. The frequency of the A. uvarum isolates originating from conventionally-treated vineyards with low resistance levels to fludioxonil was 50.7, while the respective frequency value for the A. tubingensis isolates was only 15.7%. Thus, the observed resistance profile of A. uvarum may explain its predominance in the vineyards of a conventional farming system where target-specific fungicides are heavily used to combat powdery mildew, downy mildew, or gray mold diseases. Most likely, the selected fungicide-resistant strains of A. uvarum escape the fungicidal activity of the applied products and increase in frequency compared to other black aspergilli species that are fungicide sensitive. The above data provide evidence of the role of fungicide applications in shaping fungal populations. Fungicide applications are recognized in modern agriculture as a major agent of genetic drift events within fungal populations, contributing to pathogen evolution by reducing the population size, altering their composition, and shaping their diversity [32,33]. In addition to the effect of fungicide applications in conventionally-treated vineyards and the emergence of fungicide resistant strains discovered in the current study, other factors such as differences in the core microbiome of the grape bunches may affect the presence and composition of black aspergilli and contribute to differences between conventional and organic vineyards, which merit further investigation.
The H270Υ mutation that was detected in several A. uvarum isolates mainly originated from the conventionally treated vineyards has been previously reported in several other plant pathogenic fungi such as Botrytis cinerea, Zymoseptoria tritici, Alternaria alternata, and others [34,35], while it has also been reported in the closely related Aspergillus oryzae used in the fermentation industry [36]. Similarly, the presence of H270Y or H270R mutations was reported in a limited number of A. fumigatus strains collected from agricultural environments [37,38], while the homologue mutation H249Y has been reported in A. flavus strains with laboratory-induced resistance to SDHIs [39]. The current study represents the first report of resistance development to SDHIs in a plant pathogenic Aspergillus spp. The identified H270Y sdhB mutation has been correlated with moderate to high levels of resistance to several SDHIs such as the pyrazole carboxamides fluxapyroxad and penthiopyrad, or the pyridine carboximide boscalid in B. cinerea, Corynespora cassiicola, or Didymella bryoniae. In contrast, the same mutation has been found to confer hypersensitivity to other SDHI molecules such as the benzamide molecules fluopyram and benodanil or the thiophene amide isofetamid [40,41]. Our results are in line with the above-mentioned studies since we observed a similar pattern of sensitivity toward several of the SDHIs tested in the H270Y mutants of A. uvarum. Interestingly, a double mutation (H65Q/P66S) located in sdhD was observed in a limited number of A. uvarum isolates showing moderate levels of resistance to fluxapyroxad. As far as we know, such mutations or their homologs have not been reported in any other fungal species yet. However, several other mutations in sdhD have been reported in several plant pathogenic species conferring low to moderate resistance to SDHIs [42]. Cross-resistance studies showed that the isolates possessing this double substitution in sdhD were of low to moderate resistance in all five (5) SDHI molecules tested. Interestingly, a small fraction of the resistant isolates possessed both the H270Y and the H65Q/P66S mutations. However, measurements of the sensitivity of these isolates to a set of several SDHIs revealed that their sensitivity phenotype was similar to that of H270Y mutants. This is most probably related to the fact that sdhB mutations exhibit a stronger effect on the resistance levels of the mutated strains compared to those caused by sdhC/D mutations [36]. In contrast to A. uvarum, A. tubingensis isolates with only low resistance levels to fluxapyroxad were detected, but the sequence of sdhB, sdhC, and sdhD in these isolates did not reveal any point mutation compared to the sequence of the sensitive strains. These low levels of resistance to SDHIs may be explained by increased fungicide efflux due to the hyperactivity of efflux pumps, but experimental evidence is required. The role of efflux transporters as a resistance mechanism has been extensively studied in A. fumigatus due to its medical value or in Aspergillus spp. used as model species, but no information is known for agriculturally important Aspergillus spp. [43,44,45]. In A. carbonarious, no mutation was identified in the sdhB/C/D subunits, but this fungal species is expected to be insensitive to SDHIs. A similar finding has been reported by Kalampokis et al. [46], suggesting that A. carbonarious isolates are insensitive to the SDHI boscalid.
Resistance to QoIs was only found in a certain number of the A. uvarum isolates, whereas all three (3) remaining black aspergilli species were found to be highly sensitive to pyraclostrobin. The sequencing of cytb in the resistant isolates revealed that all of them possessed a glycine replacement by alanine at codon 143 (G143A). This mutation is by far the most common mutation associated with resistance to QoIs in plant-pathogenic fungi and has been reported in more than 30 different plant-pathogenic fungal species [47]. The G143A mutation confers very high levels of resistance to QoIs, and leads to the complete loss of efficacy of QoIs against their resistant target species, while in most cases, isolates possessing this mutation do not suffer any fitness penalty. Interestingly, although almost half of the A. tubingensis included in this study originated from conventionally-treated vineyards, none of them were found to be resistant to QoIs. In several plant pathogens, the absence of resistance to QoIs associated with the G143A mutation has been associated with variations in the arrangements of exons and introns in cytb. In detail, the occurrence of an intron directly after codon 143 might have a significant impact on the splicing process, resulting in cytochrome b deficiency, and organisms with these alterations would not survive [48,49]. In addition to G143A, the replacement of phenylalanine by leucine at codon 129 (F129L) or the replacement of glycine by arginine at position 137 (G137R) have been reported in a limited number of pathogenic plant species such as Alternaria solani, Passalora fulva, or Pyrenophora tritici-repentis [50,51], but both are associated with relatively low levels of resistance to QoIs. Resistance to QoIs in A. uvarum strains, isolated from grapes, has very recently been reported in the mid-Atlantic U.S. [24]. Interestingly, in this case, resistance was associated with the F129L mutation, conferring moderate levels of resistance to QoIs as expected. Thus, the combination of our data with the data reported by Cosseboom and Hu [22] suggests that A. uvarum belongs to the short list of plant pathogens in which the presence of both F129L and G143A mutations have been reported including Plasmopara viticola, Magnaporthe grisea, and Zymospetoria tritici [52,53]. In Aspergillus flavus isolates from peanut seeds, both the F129L and G143A mutations were identified in different strains of the population [54].
Resistance to DMIs was not found to be of major importance in the present samples. High resistance to tebuconazole was observed only in a limited number of A. uvarum isolates. However, in all of these isolates, no mutation was observed in the target gene Cyp51. This is in agreement with previous reports suggesting that Cyp51 mutations do not play an important role in Aspergillus section Nigri resistance to azole fungicides as occurs with A. fumigatus clinical isolates [55]. Indeed, in A. fumigatus, several Cyp51 mutations or combinations of Cyp51 mutations with the Cyp51 promoter tandem repeats act as transcription enhancers and have been identified as the most common resistance mechanism to DMIs [22,37,56]. Most probably, other resistance mechanisms such as increased expression of the target gene or increased fungicide efflux may account for the observed phenotype in the A. uvarum isolates with resistance to tebuconazole [57,58]. Further studies are required to fully elucidate the precise mechanism of resistance to DMIs in these isolates. In addition to this, continuous monitoring of black aspergilli sensitivity to DMIs is required, taking into account that the exposure of Aspergillus strains to DMIs in agricultural environments increases the risk for the selection of resistance to azoles in strains associated with invasive aspergillosis in human patients [59].
Similar to DMIs, high levels of resistance to the phenylpyrrole fungicide fludioxonil were observed in a limited number of A. uvarum and A. tubingensis isolates, while isolates of A. carbonarius or A. niger were highly sensitive to this active ingredient. Interestingly, within the A. uvarum population tested, 43.1% of the isolates were found to be lowly resistant to fludioxonil, while in the A. tubingensis subpopulation, only 14.5% of the isolates were lowly resistant to fludioxonil. Field resistance to this fungicide class is associated with target site modifications in the histidine kinase Os gene or Os-like genes [60]. However, reports of resistance development to fludioxonil due to target site modifications in the field are very rare and have been described in a limited number of phytopathogenic fungi that mostly include several Alternaria spp. [61]. This is most probably due to fitness defects in field isolates that possess these target site alterations, as has been reported in several fungal species [62,63]. In contrast to the rarity of fludioxonil resistance due to target site modifications, several cases of low or moderate levels of resistance to fludioxonil have been reported in fungal species such as Botrytis cinerea or Penicillium expansum due to the overexpression of ABC or MFS transporters [64,65]. In the current study, due to the low frequencies of highly resistant isolates to fludioxonil, we did not emphasize the molecular mechanisms of resistance to the fungicide class. However, further research aiming to determine the precise mechanism of resistance to fludioxonil should elucidate this.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study provide evidence on the effect of fungicide resistance development on the black aspergilli incidence on grapes and population structure at the species level. Within the population tested, higher resistance frequencies were observed in A. uvarum isolates originating mostly from conventionally treated vineyards. In this fungal species, moderate frequencies of resistance were detected to respiration inhibitors such as QoIs and SDHIs. Active ingredients belonging to these two fungicide classes are commonly used in conventionally-treated vineyards to combat several foliar or bunch diseases, and black aspergilli populations are exposed to them mostly as off-target pathogens. Fungicide applications in the conventionally-treated vineyards induce selection pressure and change the composition of black aspergilli within the vineyards. The sequencing of the target genes of QoIs and SDHIs in the resistant A. uvarum isolates showed that the resistance to QoIs was associated with the presence of the G143A mutation in cytb, while the SDHI-resistant isolates possessed the H270Y mutation in sdhB or a double substitution of H65Q/P66S in sdhD. In addition to resistance to QoIs and SDHIs, low resistance levels were detected against the DMI tebuconazole in both A. uvarum and A. tubingensis, but after sequencing of the target genes Cyp51A and Cyp51B, no mutation was identified, leading to the conclusion that the observed resistance phenotype was most probably associated with the increased activity of efflux transporters. Such findings will help design appropriate strategies to manage Aspergillus bunch rot in vineyards while underlining the risk of the selection of black aspergilli-resistant strains with clinical importance since this selection is based on resistance developed in agricultural environments and not on long-term exposure to fungicides during medical therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9020221/s1, Table S1: Number of Aspergillus section Nigri isolates collected from several conventional or organic vineyards in Greece and used for fungicide sensitivity measurements; Table S2: Range of fungicide concentrations (mg L−1) used to determine the sensitivity profile of several Aspergillus section Nigri isolates to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, fludioxonil, and pyraclostrobin; Table S3: Published sequences of the sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, cytb, Cyp51A, and Cyp51B genes used to design the respective primer pairs for the Aspergillus uvarum and A. tubingensis resistant isolates; Table S4: Accession numbers of the Aspergillus uvarum sequences of sensitive and resistant isolates possessing the H270Y, H65Q/P66S, and G143A mutations in the sdhB, sdhD, and cytb encoding genes, respectively. The sequences were submitted to the publicly available database of the National Center of Biotechnology and Information (NCBI).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.I.T. and G.S.K.; Methodology, S.I.T. and G.S.K.; Data curation, S.I.T. and G.S.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.I.T. and G.S.K.; Writing—review and editing, S.I.T. and G.S.K.; Visualization, S.I.T.; Supervision, G.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All experimental data are provided in the manuscript and in the supplementary files.

Acknowledgments

The implementation of this doctoral thesis was co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund-ESF) through the Operational Program “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” in the context of the Act “Enhancing Human Resources Research Potential by undertaking a Doctoral Research” Sub-action 2: IKY Scholarship Program for Ph.D. candidates in Greek Universities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tjamos, S.E.; Antoniou, P.P.; Kazantzidou, A.; Antonopoulos, D.F.; Papageorgiou, I.; Tjamos, E.C. Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus carbonarius in Corinth Raisin and Wine-Producing Vineyards in Greece: Population Composition, Ochratoxin a Production and Chemical Control. J. Phytopathol. 2004, 152, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Battilani, P.; Barbano, C.; Marin, S.; Sanchis, V.; Kozakiewicz, Z.; Magan, N. Mapping of Aspergillus section Nigri in Southern Europe and Israel Based on Geostatistical Analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, S72–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chiotta, M.L.; Ponsone, M.L.; Sosa, D.M.; Combina, M.; Chulze, S.N. Biodiversity of Aspergillus Section Nigri Populations in Argentinian Vineyards and Ochratoxin a Contamination. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kizis, D.; Natskoulis, P.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Panagou, E.Z. Biodiversity and ITS-RFLP Characterisation of Aspergillus section Nigri Isolates in Grapes from Four Traditional Grape-Producing Areas in Greece. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Houbraken, J.; Kocsubé, S.; Visagie, C.M.; Yilmaz, N.; Wang, X.-C.; Meijer, M.; Kraak, B.; Hubka, V.; Bensch, K.; Samson, R.A.; et al. Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and Related Genera (Eurotiales): An Overview of Families, Genera, Subgenera, Sections, Series and Species. Stud. Mycol. 2020, 95, 5–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pantelides, I.S.; Aristeidou, E.; Lazari, M.; Tsolakidou, M.-D.; Tsaltas, D.; Christofidou, M.; Kafouris, D.; Christou, E.; Ioannou, N. Biodiversity and Ochratoxin a Profile of Aspergillus Section Nigri Populations Isolated from Wine Grapes in Cyprus Vineyards. Food Microbiol. 2017, 67, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ismail, M.A. Incidence and Significance of Black Aspergilli in Agricultural Commodities: A Review, with a Key to All Species Accepted To-Date. Eur. J. Biol. Res. 2017, 7, 207–222. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gil-Serna, J.; García-Díaz, M.; Vázquez, C.; González-Jaén, M.T.; Patiño, B. Significance of Aspergillus niger Aggregate Species as Contaminants of Food Products in Spain Regarding Their Occurrence and Their Ability to Produce Mycotoxins. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gil-Serna, J.; Vázquez, C.; González-Jaén, M.; Patiño, B. Wine Contamination with Ochratoxins: A Review. Beverages 2018, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mogensen, J.M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Thrane, U.; Nielsen, K.F. Production of Fumonisin B2 and B4 by Aspergillus niger on Grapes and Raisins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Badali, H.; Fakhim, H.; Zarei, F.; Nabili, M.; Vaezi, A.; Poorzad, N.; Dolatabadi, S.; Mirhendi, H. In Vitro Activities of Five Antifungal Drugs against Opportunistic Agents of Aspergillus nigri Complex. Mycopathologia 2016, 181, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iatta, R.; Nuccio, F.; Immediato, D.; Mosca, A.; De Carlo, C.; Miragliotta, G.; Parisi, A.; Crescenzo, G.; Otranto, D.; Cafarchia, C. Species Distribution and in Vitro Azole Susceptibility of Aspergillus Section Nigri Isolates from Clinical and Environmental Settings. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 2365–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vermeulen, E.; Maertens, J.; Meersseman, P.; Saegeman, V.; Dupont, L.; Lagrou, K. Invasive Aspergillus niger Complex Infections in a Belgian Tertiary Care Hospital. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O333–O335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Favilla, M.; Pascale, M.; Ricelli, A.; Evidente, A.; Amalfitano, C.; Altomare, C. Inhibition of Species of the Aspergillus section Nigri and Ochratoxin a Production in Grapes by Fusapyrone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2248–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Apaliya, M.T.; Mahunu, G.K.; Chen, L.; Li, W. Control of Ochratoxin A-Producing Fungi in Grape Berry by Microbial Antagonists: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valero, A.; Marín, S.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V. Effect of Preharvest fungicides and interacting fungi on Aspergillus carbonarius growth and Ochratoxin A synthesis in dehydrating grapes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bellí, N.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. Impact of Fungicides on Aspergillus carbonarius Growth and Ochratoxin a Production on Synthetic Grape-like Medium and on Grapes. Food Addit. Contam. 2006, 23, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cherrad, S.; Charnay, A.; Hernandez, C.; Steva, H.; Belbahri, L.; Vacher, S. Emergence of Boscalid-Resistant Strains of Erysiphe necator in French Vineyards. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 216, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Massi, F.; Torriani, S.F.F.; Borghi, L.; Toffolatti, S.L. Fungicide Resistance Evolution and Detection in Plant Pathogens: Plasmopara viticola as a Case Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Miccolis Angelini, R.M.; Rotolo, C.; Masiello, M.; Gerin, D.; Pollastro, S.; Faretra, F. Occurrence of Fungicide Resistance in Populations of Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis cinerea) on Table Grape and Strawberry in Southern Italy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.; Denning, D. Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases—Estimate Precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verweij, P.E.; Snelders, E.; Kema, G.H.; Mellado, E.; Melchers, W.J. Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: A Side-Effect of Environmental Fungicide Use? Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Perlin, D.S.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The Global Problem of Antifungal Resistance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e383–e392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cosseboom, S.D.; Hu, M. Off-Target Selection of Resistance to Azoxystrobin in Aspergillus Species Associated with Grape Late Season Rots. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Testempasis, S.; Kamou, N.N.; Papadakis, E.-N.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Conventional vs. Organic Vineyards: Black Aspergilli Population Structure, Mycotoxigenic Capacity and Mycotoxin Contamination Assessment in Wines, Using a New Q-TOF MS-MS Detection Method. Food Control 2022, 136, 108860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gill, H.K.; Garg, H. Pesticides: Environmental Impacts and Management Strategies. Pestic.-Toxic Asp. 2014, 8, 187. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cosseboom, S.D.; Hu, M. Diversity, Pathogenicity, and Fungicide Sensitivity of Fungal Species Associated with Late-Season Rots of Wine Grape in the Mid-Atlantic United States. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 3101–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tjamos, S.E.; Antoniou, P.P.; Tjamos, E.C. Aspergillus Spp., Distribution, Population Composition and Ochratoxin A Production in Wine Producing Vineyards in Greece. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, S61–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vitali Čepo, D.; Pelajić, M.; Vinković Vrček, I.; Krivohlavek, A.; Žuntar, I.; Karoglan, M. Differences in the Levels of Pesticides, Metals, Sulphites and Ochratoxin a between Organically and Conventionally Produced Wines. Food Chem. 2018, 246, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernhoft, A.; Torp, M.; Clasen, P.-E.; Løes, A.-K.; Kristoffersen, A.B. Influence of Agronomic and Climatic Factors on Fusarium Infestation and Mycotoxin Contamination of Cereals in Norway. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 29, 1129–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lazzaro, I.; Moretti, A.; Giorni, P.; Brera, C.; Battilani, P. Organic vs Conventional Farming: Differences in Infection by Mycotoxin-Producing Fungi on Maize and Wheat in Northern and Central Italy. Crop. Prot. 2015, 72, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stukenbrock, E.H.; McDonald, B.A. The Origins of Plant Pathogens in Agro-Ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2008, 46, 75–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Walker, A.-S.; Ravigne, V.; Rieux, A.; Ali, S.; Carpentier, F.; Fournier, E. Fungal Adaptation to Contemporary Fungicide Applications: The Case of Botrytis cinerea Populations from Champagne Vineyards (France). Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 1919–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Veloukas, T.; Leroch, M.; Hahn, M.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Detection and Molecular Characterization of Boscalid-Resistant Botrytis cinerea Isolates from Strawberry. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Avenot, H.F.; Sellam, A.; Karaoglanidis, G.; Michailides, T.J. Characterization of Mutations in the Iron-Sulphur Subunit of Succinate Dehydrogenase Correlating with Boscalid Resistance in Alternaria alternata from California Pistachio. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shima, Y.; Ito, Y.; Kaneko, S.; Hatabayhasi, H.; Watanabe, Y.; Adachi, Y.; Yabe, K. Identification of Three Mutant Loci Conferring Carboxin-Resistance and Development of a Novel Transformation System in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fraaije, B.; Atkins, S.; Hanley, S.; Macdonald, A.; Lucas, J. The Multi-Fungicide Resistance Status of Aspergillus fumigatus Populations in Arable Soils and the Wider European Environment. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 599233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Monzon, S.; Lucio, J.; Cuesta, I.; Mellado, E. Multiresistance to Nonazole Fungicides in Aspergillus fumigatus TR34/L98H Azole-Resistant Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0064221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masiello, M.; Somma, S.; Haidukowski, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Moretti, A. Genetic Polymorphisms Associated to SDHI Fungicides Resistance in Selected Aspergillus flavus Strains and Relation with Aflatoxin Production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 334, 108799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Veloukas, T.; Markoglou, A.N.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Differential Effect of SdhB Gene Mutations on the Sensitivity to SDHI Fungicides in Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zuniga, A.I.; Oliveira, M.S.; Rebello, C.S.; Peres, N.A. Baseline Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea Isolates from Strawberry to Isofetamid Compared to Other SDHIs. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stammler, G.; Wolf, A.; Glaettli, A.; Klappach, K. Respiration Inhibitors: Complex II. In Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cannon, R.D.; Lamping, E.; Holmes, A.R.; Niimi, K.; Baret, P.V.; Keniya, M.V.; Tanabe, K.; Niimi, M.; Goffeau, A.; Monk, B.C. Efflux-Mediated Antifungal Drug Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Esquivel, B.D.; Rybak, J.M.; Barker, K.S.; Fortwendel, J.R.; Rogers, P.D.; White, T.C. Characterization of the Efflux Capability and Substrate Specificity of Aspergillus fumigatus PDR5-like ABC Transporters Expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mBio 2020, 11, e00338-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Meneau, I.; Coste, A.T.; Sanglard, D. Identification of Aspergillus fumigatus multidrug Transporter Genes and Their Potential Involvement in Antifungal Resistance. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kalampokis, I.F.; Kapetanakis, G.C.; Aliferis, K.A.; Diallinas, G. Multiple Nucleobase Transporters Contribute to Boscalid Sensitivity in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. FG B 2018, 115, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sierotzki, H. Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens, Respiration Inhibitors: Complex III; Springer: Japan, Tokyo, 2015; pp. 119–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Andrade, S.M.P.; Augusti, G.R.; Paiva, G.F.; Feksa, H.R.; Tessmann, D.J.; Machado, F.J.; Mizubuti, E.S.G.; Del Ponte, E.M. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of the Resistance to Azoxystrobin and Pyraclostrobin in Fusarium graminearum. Populations from Brazil. Plant Pathol. 2022, 71, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gisi, U.; Sierotzki, H.; Cook, A.; McCaffery, A. Mechanisms Influencing the Evolution of Resistance to Qo Inhibitor Fungicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pasche, J.S.; Piche, L.M.; Gudmestad, N.C. Effect of the F129L Mutation in Alternaria Solani on Fungicides Affecting Mitochondrial Respiration. Plant Dis. 2005, 89, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sautua, F.J.; Carmona, M.A. Detection and Characterization of QoI Resistance in Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Populations Causing Tan Spot of Wheat in Argentina. Plant. Pathol. 2021, 70, 2125–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Toffolatti, S.L.; Serrati, L.; Sierotzki, H.; Gisi, U.; Vercesi, A. Assessment of QoI Resistance in Plasmopara viticola Oospores. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mae, A.; Fillinger, S.; Sooväli, P.; Heick, T.M. Fungicide Sensitivity Shifting of Zymoseptoria tritici in the Finnish-Baltic Region and a Novel Insertion in the MFS1 Promoter. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ali, M.E.; Gunn, M.; Stackhouse, T.; Waliullah, S.; Guo, B.; Culbreath, A.; Brenneman, T. Sensitivity of Aspergillus flavus Isolates from Peanut Seeds in Georgia to Azoxystrobin, a Quinone Outside Inhibitor (QoI) Fungicide. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Howard, S.J.; Harrison, E.; Bowyer, P.; Varga, J.; Denning, D.W. Cryptic Species and Azole Resistance in the Aspergillus niger Complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4802–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Lv, Q.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y. The Fungal Cyp51s: Their Functions, Structures, Related Drug Resistance, and Inhibitors. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hagiwara, D.; Watanabe, A.; Kamei, K. Sensitisation of an Azole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Strain Containing the Cyp51A-Related Mutation by Deleting the SrbA Gene. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cui, N.; He, Y.; Yao, S.; Zhang, H.; Ren, J.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Tebuconazole Induces Triazole-Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus in Liquid Medium and Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Verweij, P.E.; Lestrade, P.P.A.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Meis, J.F. Azole Resistance Surveillance in Aspergillus fumigatus: Beneficial or Biased? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2079–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qiu, J.B.; Yu, M.Z.; Yin, Q.; Xu, J.H.; Shi, J.R. Molecular Characterization, Fitness, and Mycotoxin Production of Fusarium asiaticum Strains Resistant to Fludioxonil. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1759–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kilani, J.; Fillinger, S. Phenylpyrroles: 30 Years, Two Molecules and (Nearly) No Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ren, W.; Shao, W.; Han, X.; Zhou, M.; Chen, C. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of Laboratory and Field Mutants of Botrytis cinerea Resistant to Fludioxonil. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1414–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. John, E.; Lopez-Ruiz, F.; Rybak, K.; Mousley, C.J.; Oliver, R.P.; Tan, K.-C. Dissecting the Role of Histidine Kinase and HOG1 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signalling in Stress Tolerance and Pathogenicity of Parastagonospora nodorum on Wheat. Microbiology 2016, 162, 1023–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Leroch, M.; Plesken, C.; Weber, R.W.S.; Kauff, F.; Scalliet, G.; Hahn, M. Gray Mold Populations in German Strawberry Fields Are Resistant to Multiple Fungicides and Dominated by a Novel Clade Closely Related to Botrytis cinerea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Samaras, A.; Ntasiou, P.; Myresiotis, C.; Karaoglanidis, G. Multidrug Resistance of Penicillium expansum to Fungicides: Whole Transcriptome Analysis of MDR Strains Reveals Overexpression of Efflux Transporter Genes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 335, 108896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Frequency (%) of sensitive (S), lowly resistant (LR), and highly resistant (HR) isolates of Aspergillus uvarum (A) (n = 102) and Aspergillus tubingensis (B) (n = 151) populations obtained from conventional (blue columns) or organic (brown columns) vineyards to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, pyraclostrobin, and fludioxonil. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the two farming systems according to a series of z-test analyses (p = 0.05).
Figure 1. Frequency (%) of sensitive (S), lowly resistant (LR), and highly resistant (HR) isolates of Aspergillus uvarum (A) (n = 102) and Aspergillus tubingensis (B) (n = 151) populations obtained from conventional (blue columns) or organic (brown columns) vineyards to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, pyraclostrobin, and fludioxonil. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the two farming systems according to a series of z-test analyses (p = 0.05).
Jof 09 00221 g001
Figure 2. Frequency (%) of H270Y, H65Q/P66S, H270Y, and H65Q/P66S, and the G143A mutants of the Aspergillus uvarum population within the fluxapyroxad-resistant (n = 42) and pyraclostrobin-resistant (n = 16) fraction of the population.
Figure 2. Frequency (%) of H270Y, H65Q/P66S, H270Y, and H65Q/P66S, and the G143A mutants of the Aspergillus uvarum population within the fluxapyroxad-resistant (n = 42) and pyraclostrobin-resistant (n = 16) fraction of the population.
Jof 09 00221 g002
Figure 3. Multiple sequence alignment of nucleotides and amino acids of the sdhB gene in SDHI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing the H270Y mutation.
Figure 3. Multiple sequence alignment of nucleotides and amino acids of the sdhB gene in SDHI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing the H270Y mutation.
Jof 09 00221 g003
Figure 4. Multiple sequence alignment of nucleotides and amino acids of the sdhD gene in SDHI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing H65Q/P66S mutations.
Figure 4. Multiple sequence alignment of nucleotides and amino acids of the sdhD gene in SDHI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing H65Q/P66S mutations.
Jof 09 00221 g004
Figure 5. Multiple sequence alignment of the nucleotides and amino acids of the cytochrome b gene in the QoI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing the G143A mutation.
Figure 5. Multiple sequence alignment of the nucleotides and amino acids of the cytochrome b gene in the QoI resistant isolates of Aspergillus uvarum possessing the G143A mutation.
Jof 09 00221 g005
Figure 6. Germ tube growth of the Aspergillus uvarum isolates (A60-sensitive; A137—H270Y; A121-H65Q/P66S; B12—H270Y+H65Q/P66S) grown on nutrient media amended with several concentrations of the SDHI fungicides boscalid, fluopyram, isofetamid, penthiopyrad, and fluxapyroxad.
Figure 6. Germ tube growth of the Aspergillus uvarum isolates (A60-sensitive; A137—H270Y; A121-H65Q/P66S; B12—H270Y+H65Q/P66S) grown on nutrient media amended with several concentrations of the SDHI fungicides boscalid, fluopyram, isofetamid, penthiopyrad, and fluxapyroxad.
Jof 09 00221 g006
Table 1. Designed primer pairs for the amplification and the sequencing of PCR products for the sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, Cyp51A, Cyp51B, and cytb subunits of the Aspergillus uvarum and A. tubingensis isolates.
Table 1. Designed primer pairs for the amplification and the sequencing of PCR products for the sdhB, sdhC, sdhD, Cyp51A, Cyp51B, and cytb subunits of the Aspergillus uvarum and A. tubingensis isolates.
Aspergillus SpeciesPrimer IDTargetForward (5’→3’)Reverse (5’→3’)Amplicon Size (bp)Annealing Temperature (° C)
Aspergillus uvarumsdhB_uva_Fw/RvsdhBCAGTGCCTTCAGGGTCTATCCCGCCCTTTATTTTGCTGCCA148865
sdhC_uva_Fw/RvsdhCTCTTTCCTGGTCGACCACGATGACTGGCTATGGAATATATATTGCA97160
sdhD_uva_Fw/RvsdhDTCGAACCGCGATCACCAATCACACTCATTTTATGCTCCAGGGT121765
Cyp51a_uva_Fw/RvCyp51AGCGATGTAAACAGTACGGCGGAGTTGGGGCAGTGCTACAC178265
Cyp51b_uva_Fw/RvCyp51BTCTCAGCCACAATCACCCTGGTATATATACATTAGCTTCTCAGCAGC213665
Cytb_asp2_Fw/RvCytochrome bTGTAAATAATGGTTGATTAGTACGTTTGGTCTGAATTGTACTCCTCT75260
Aspergillus tubingensisSdhB_tub_Fw/RvsdhBTCGCCATCTGGTAGATCCCTTCCGACATGAAAGACCTCGG123265
SdhC_tub_Fw/RvsdhCGGTTTCCCCGGCTGCTGTTGACAGGAAAGCAAGAATGAGAGCGC58465
SdhD_tub_Fw/RvsdhDGACCAATCAGAGGCACGACAAAGTACATCTTTTATAGCTCGATGAGC123565
Cyp51a_tub_Fw/RvCyp51AGCCTCCTTCCGTTGCTAACACGTGGAGAGTCCCGGAGATA178865
Cyp51b_tub_Fw/RvCyp51BCGGTCATTCTGTTTCCGCTGTGCAGTAACAGAGGCAGGTC181365
Table 2. Sensitivity measurements of Aspergillus section Nigri species from grapes to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, pyraclostrobin, and fludioxonil.
Table 2. Sensitivity measurements of Aspergillus section Nigri species from grapes to fluxapyroxad, tebuconazole, pyraclostrobin, and fludioxonil.
SpeciesFungicidePhenotype aNumber of IsolatesRange of EC50 Values bMean EC50Resistance Factor c
A. uvarumfluxapyroxadS520.02 to 0.290.150.13 to 1.93
LR330.3 to 4.330.932 to 29
HR17>10>10>67
tebuconazoleS960.01 to 0.180.10.1 to 1.83
LRnd dndndnd
HR6>1>1>10
pyraclostrobinS860.0008 to 0.0780.040 to 1.96
LRndndndnd
HR16>100>100>2500
fludioxonilS560.004 to 0.0190.010.3 to 1.92
LR440.02 to 0.130.052 to 13.3
HR2>1>1>100
A. tubingensisfluxapyroxadS1200.00006 to 0.0970.050 to 1.95
LR310.10 to 3.520.342 to 70.4
HRndndndnd
tebuconazoleS930.01 to 0.890.460 to 1.93
LR580.93 to 2.851.352 to 6.19
HRndndndnd
pyraclostrobinS1510.0004 to 0.0260.020 to 1.3
LRndndndnd
HRndndndnd
fludioxonilS1290.002 to 0.0380.020 to 1.9
LR180.042 to 0.080.052.1 to 4
HR4>1>1>50
A. nigerfluxapyroxadS190.03 to 0.060.040.7 to 1.5
LRndndndnd
HRndndndnd
tebuconazoleS110.1 to 0.450.250.4 to 1.8
LR80.52 to 1.320.772.1 to 5.3
HRndndndnd
pyraclostrobinS190.0001 to 0.0080.0010 to 0.8
LRndndndnd
HRndndndnd
fludioxonilS190.0143 to 0.0380.020.7 to 1.9
LRndndndnd
HRndndndnd
A. carbonariusfluxapyroxadSndndndnd
LRndndndnd
HR22>20>20N/A e
tebuconazoleS140.05 to 0.440.230.2 to 1.9
LR80.51 to 1.180.712.2 to 5.1
HRndndndnd
pyraclostrobinS220.00006 to 0.0240.020 to 1.2
LRndndndnd
HRndndndnd
fludioxonilS200.0061 to 0.0320.020.3 to 1.6
LR20.04 to 0.090.092 to 4.5
HRndndndnd
a Phenotype: S: Sensitive, LR: Low resistance, HR: High resistance; b EC50 values in mg L-1; c Resistance Factor values were determined by dividing the EC50 value of each isolate by the mean EC50 value of the most sensitive isolates; d nd: non detected; e N/A: not applicable.
Table 3. EC50 and resistance factor (RF) values to several SDHI fungicides of sensitive and resistant Aspergillus uvarum isolates, possessing the H270Y mutation in the sdhB gene and/or the H65Q/P66S mutations in the sdhD gene.
Table 3. EC50 and resistance factor (RF) values to several SDHI fungicides of sensitive and resistant Aspergillus uvarum isolates, possessing the H270Y mutation in the sdhB gene and/or the H65Q/P66S mutations in the sdhD gene.
IsolatePhenotypeFluxapyroxadBoscalidPenthiopyradIsofetamidFluopyram
EC50 aRF bEC50RFEC50RFEC50RFEC50RF
A66Sensitive0.0051 1.7 0.0045 0.9 0.0345 1.8 0.0077 1.6 0.005 0.8
A147Sensitive0.0045 1.5 0.0034 0.7 0.0048 0.3 0.0039 0.8 0.008 1.5
A88Sensitive0.0012 0.40.0071 1.4 0.0178 0.9 0.0031 0.6 0.005 0.8
A137H270Y0.2424 80.8 1.3150 263 3.3080 174 0.0004 0.1 0.001 0.1
A127H270Y0.6251 208 1.4900 298 2.4160 127 0.0035 0.7 0.002 0.3
B7H270Y1.9920 664 0.9796 195 2.6590 140 0.0023 0.5 0.004 0.6
B9H270Y0.1517 50.5 1.0370 207 0.3942 20.7 0.0037 0.7 0.003 0.5
B14H65Q/P66S0.0150 5.0 0.2205 44.1 0.0632 3.3 0.0261 5.3 0.098 16.3
A67H65Q/P66S0.0168 5.6 0.0605 12.1 0.0527 2.7 0.0183 3.7 0.094 15.6
A121H65Q/P66S0.0461 15.3 0.1290 25.8 0.0842 4.4 0.1381 28.1 0.332 55.3
A69H65Q/P66S0.0196 6.5 0.0606 12.1 0.0763 4.0 0.0466 9.5 0.085 14.2
B144H65Q/P66S0.0209 6.9 0.0591 11.8 0.1084 5.7 0.0682 13.9 0.193 32.1
B12H270Y+H65Q+P66S0.6217 207 0.8671 173 1.4010 73.7 0.0019 0.4 0.004 0.6
B10H270Y+H65Q+P66S0.2446 81.5 0.8866 177 0.3996 21.0 0.0016 0.3 0.005 0.8
B11H270Y+H65Q+P66S0.1366 45.5 0.8942 178 0.4867 25.6 0.0009 0.1 0.003 0.5
a EC50 values in μg ml-1; b RF values were calculated by dividing the isolate EC50 value by the mean EC50 values for the non-mutated isolates of 0.003, 0.005, 0.019, 0.0049 and 0.006 μg ml-1 for fluxapyroxad, boscalid, penthiopyrad, isofetamid and fluopyram, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Testempasis, S.I.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Resistance of Black Aspergilli Species from Grape Vineyards to SDHI, QoI, DMI, and Phenylpyrrole Fungicides. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020221

AMA Style

Testempasis SI, Karaoglanidis GS. Resistance of Black Aspergilli Species from Grape Vineyards to SDHI, QoI, DMI, and Phenylpyrrole Fungicides. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(2):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Testempasis, Stefanos I., and George S. Karaoglanidis. 2023. "Resistance of Black Aspergilli Species from Grape Vineyards to SDHI, QoI, DMI, and Phenylpyrrole Fungicides" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 2: 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop