Next Article in Journal
Structural Analysis of the A Mating Type Locus and Development of the Mating Type Marker of Agaricus bisporus var. bisporus
Next Article in Special Issue
Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Diagnostic Approach: Real-Life Experience in a Tertiary Centre
Previous Article in Journal
Mycotoxins from Tomato Pathogenic Alternaria alternata and Their Combined Cytotoxic Effects on Human Cell Lines and Male Albino Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Incidence of Candidemia in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Supported by Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phaeohyphomycosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Narrative Review of the Literature

by
Davide Lo Porto
1,*,
Andrea Cona
1,
Francesca Todaro
1,
Elena De Carolis
2,
Francesca Cardinale
1,
Neha Hafeez
3,
Giuseppina Di Martino
1,
Pier Giulio Conaldi
1,
Maurizio Sanguinetti
2,
Paolo Antonio Grossi
4 and
Alessandra Mularoni
1
1
Unit of Infectious Diseases, ISMETT-IRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, Via E. Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
4
Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria-ASST-Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(3), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030283
Submission received: 22 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 20 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Diseases in Europe)

Abstract

:
Phaeohyphomycosis comprises a variety of infections caused by pigmented fungi. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly at risk of invasive infections due to their prolonged immunosuppression. Here, we describe three cases of phaeohyphomycosis in SOT recipients who were successfully treated with surgical excision and/or antifungal therapy. We additionally carried out a narrative review of the literature on phaeohyphomycosis in 94 SOT recipients from 66 published studies describing 40 different species of fungi. The most reported fungus was Alternaria (21%). The median time from transplant to diagnosis was 18 months (IQR 8.25–48), and kidney transplants were the most reported. Antifungal regimens were not homogeneous, though there was a prevalence of itraconazole- and voriconazole-based treatments. Clinical outcomes included recovery in 81% and death in 5% of infected SOT recipients. Susceptibility testing was done in 26.6% of the cases, with heterogeneous results due to the variety of species isolated. While the wide diversity of dematiaceous fungi and their host range make it difficult to offer a uniform approach for phaeohyphomycosis, an early diagnosis and therapy are critical in preventing the dissemination of disease in the immunocompromised host.

1. Introduction

The term “phaeohyphomycosis” refers to subcutaneous, superficial, and systemic infections caused by pigmented (dematiaceous) fungi. There are over 100 species, and over 50 genera of these fungi, which have been associated with human disease [1]. The presence of melanin in their cell walls is characteristic of the condition, and likely an important virulence factor, believed to be involved in evasion from the host immune response [2]. Most human diseases caused by these fungi are noninvasive (e.g., onychomycosis, superficial cutaneous infection, chronic allergic fungal sinusitis) and associated with low mortality. However, rarely, phaeohyphomycosis can lead to invasive complications, including skin and subcutaneous disease, pneumonia, central nervous system (CNS) disease, fungemia, and multi-organ disseminated disease. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly at risk of invasive infections due to prolonged immunosuppression [3,4]. We describe three cases of phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria alternata, Curvularia hawaiiensis, and Alternaria infectoria in two heart recipients and one kidney recipient, respectively. Additionally, we provide a narrative review of the literature on phaeohyphomycosis infections occurring in SOT recipients over the last 10 years.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Series

We report three cases of SOT recipients diagnosed with cutaneous and subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria alternata, Alternaria infectoria, and Curvularia hawaiiensis. The identification of the species was made using both traditional microbiology (on a sabouraud chloramphenicol gentamicin agar growth medium) and molecular biology by isolating 18S rRNA, a small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU rRNA), a component of the eukaryotic ribosomal small subunit (40S). All patients provided written informed consent for this research.

2.2. Review of the Literature

We carried out a narrative review of the literature using PubMed with the following search terms: “phaeohyphomycosis” AND “transplant,” selecting only SOT recipients. All relevant articles from January 2011 to August 2022 were screened, selecting cases diagnosed between January 2011 and August 2022. Articles published in English, Spanish, and French were included. The cases were divided into those reported in Europe and cases from other continents. The following data were included: the type of transplant, time from transplant to diagnosis, localization of the infection, the species of fungi, susceptibility test availability, type of treatment, and clinical outcome. We defined “full recovery” for patients who were described as completely cured after therapy and “partial recovery” when there was an improvement but no clinical cure. We considered cases of phaeohyphomycosis to be “local infections” if they involved only the skin and subcutaneous tissues. We considered cases to be “local deep” if they were localized in deep tissues such as bones, glands, or mucous membranes. Finally, infections were classified as “disseminated” when they involved internal organs, such as the brain, liver, lungs, or non-contiguous bones [4].

3. Results

3.1. Case 1

A 53-year-old male presented with a cutaneous lesion on the right leg 7 months after a heart transplant was performed for cardiac failure due to giant cell myocarditis. His clinical history was marked by acute cellular rejection at month 1 after the transplant, treated with steroid boluses. At the time of the skin lesion appearance, his immunosuppressive therapy was based on 15 mg of prednisone once daily, 750 mg of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) twice daily, and tacrolimus (FK) with a trough level of around 14 ng/mL. The cutaneous lesion presented as a hard ulcerated nodule 1 cm in diameter draining purulent fluid (Figure 1A). The lesion was scraped by the Infectious Disease and Dermatology team and was cultured. Two weeks after the mycelium was grown at 30 °C on a sabouraud chloramphenicol gentamicin agar plate, a scraping culture was made and after a microscopic examination, DNA extraction was performed. A polymerase chain reaction using 18S r-DNA revealed Curvularia hawaiiensis and a topical therapy with bifonazole was started. The strain susceptibility assay was performed at the reference center (Università Cattolica-Policlinico Gemelli) with Sensititre™ YeastOne ITAMYUCC, (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA) broth micro-dilution, following CLSI methods for filamentous fungi [5] (Table 1). ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines were used for the results interpretation [6].
After 4 weeks of topical therapy, there was no improvement in the cutaneous lesion, and the patient developed eyelid ptosis, so a total-body CT scan was performed over concern for cerebral dissemination. There was no evidence of cerebral involvement, but two undefined pulmonary nodules were noted in the right lung and one in the left. The cutaneous lesion was surgically removed, and a systemic therapy with 400 mg of itraconazole once daily commenced. The patient was informed to take itraconazole capsules with food and acid drinks to obtain adequate plasma concentrations. FK dosing was reduced by 60% with monitoring of the trough levels. The therapeutic drug monitoring of itraconazole, measured by HPLC, showed a trough level of 1.4 mg/L and a peak level of 1.9 mg/L; the administered dose was unchanged for the duration of the therapy. Two months later, there was no evidence of recurrence of the cutaneous lesions, and the pulmonary nodules at CT were unchanged. The therapy was administered for 4 months. At the 5-month follow-up the patient was stable, with no recurrence.

3.2. Case 2

A 63-year-old male, working as a tomato grower, presented with a cutaneous erythematous nodular lesion 8 months after a heart transplant. His immunosuppressive therapy consisted of 20 mg of prednisone daily, 500 mg of MMF twice daily, and tacrolimus with a trough level of around 8 ng/mL. His medical history included an acute cellular rejection, treated with steroid boluses at 2 months after the transplant.
The lesion, on his left thigh, was 1.5 cm in diameter with a crusty and ulcerated surface that had been growing in dimension over the previous 3 months, followed by 2 satellite lesions on the same limb (Figure 1B). No pain or itching was present. The lesions were concerning for of a lymphoproliferative malignancy; as a result, an excisional biopsy was done. The histopathological examination showed no sign of malignancy, but a significant inflammatory pattern was found, with neutrophilic infiltrate and the presence of hyphae and yeast-like structures. Molecular biology (18s-rRNA) performed on the excisional biopsy from the lesions on the thigh identified Alternaria alternata.
A chest and brain CT scan was done, though no sign of dissemination was found. After the excisional biopsy, an oral therapy with isavuconazole was administered for 2 months, monitoring the FK trough levels. Four months after the cessation of therapy, the patient presented with two new cutaneous lesions on his forearms, which were surgically removed. A new histopathological examination found the same pattern as the first lesion, and Alternaria alternata was identified again with molecular biology and culture (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The fungal isolate was sent for susceptibility testing to the reference center (Università Cattolica-Policlinico Gemelli). Based on the result of the susceptibility test [5] (Table 2), therapy with itraconazole commenced. Therapy was administered after meals, with lemon juice to improve the absorption. Monitoring of the trough level of itraconazole was done 7 days after starting the therapy, showing a trough level of 0.4 mg/L, which was under the therapeutic range (target range level between 0.5 and 1 mg/L), and the patient was told to take itraconazole 12 h apart from the therapy with the omeprazole he was taking simultaneously. The tacrolimus dose was reduced by 60%. Itraconazole was administered for 3 months. At the 6-month follow-up, there was no sign of new lesions or of dissemination.

3.3. Case 3

A 59-year-old male, working as a wheat farmer, with a history of kidney transplant for an IgA nephropathy performed 10 years prior, presented for a routine dermatological consult. His immunosuppressive therapy consisted of 500 mg of MMF twice daily, 2.5 mg of prednisone daily, and FK with a trough level of 6 ng/mL. A physical examination showed a lesion behind the ear and two other lesions, one on each knee (Figure 1C). The lesions on the knees were two crusty painless nodules that had been growing for several months. The lesion behind the ears was surgically removed, and the histological examination showed pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Scraping was done from the knee lesions, which yielded Alternaria infectoria as the species responsible for the infection. A total-body CT scan was done, and no other lesions were found. The lesions on the knees were surgically removed, and an inflammatory pattern was found at histological examination. No antifungal systemic therapy was administered, and no signs of relapse were found at the one-year follow-up.

3.4. Literature Review

A narrative review of the literature yielded a total of 66 published studies, with 94 cases from several countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, France, French Antilles, Germany, Japan, India, Italy, Kuwait, Portugal, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Thailand, and the U.S.). We divided the cases into those reported from Europe (Eu n = 36) and from other continents (Non-Eu n = 58) (Table 2). Among studies published outside Europe, 28 reports were from America, 26 were from Asia, and 4 were from Australia. Most of the cases (75%) were published between 2016 and 2022. A geographical distribution was noted, with 85% of the cases reported from countries with a mild or tropical climate. The majority of the cases in the EU were reported from Spain and France (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7).

3.5. Reported Cases from Europe vs. Outside Europe

Our literature review revealed a total of 94 cases, with 38% reported in the EU and 62% reported outside the EU. In total, 73% of the infections were reported in kidney transplants recipients, 14% were in lung transplants, 7.5% were in heart transplants, and 5.5% were in liver transplants. When comparing the EU and non-EU cases, lung transplant represented 36% and 0%, kidney transplant 45% and 91%, heart transplant 11% and 5%, and liver transplant 8% and 4%, respectively. Overall, the median age of patients at disease presentation was 56 years old (54 years old in EU vs. 58.5 in non-EU) and a male/female ratio of 3.5 in EU vs. 2.3 in other countries. The median time from transplant to diagnosis in months was 18, with no relevant differences all over the world. From all the reported cases, 70% were classified as “local,” 22% as “disseminated,” and 8% as “local deep”, with no differences between EU and non-EU countries.
We found approximately 40 different species of fungi causing phaeohyphomycosis in our review. Among cases with available pathogen identification, the most reported genus was Alternaria (19/81, 24%), followed by Exophiala (13/81, 16%) worldwide. In Europe, the causative microorganism was available in all of the cases; we found 16 different species of fungi, in most of the cases belonging to the genus Alternaria (44% of European cases), though Cladophialophora bantiana, Exophiala spp, and Medicopsis romeroi were commonly reported. Outside of Europe, in 52% of the reported cases, the identification of the pathogen was not available. In the remaining cases, over 30 different species of fungi were identified. Most cases involved the genus Exophiala (10/45, 22% of non-EU cases), though Alternaria spp. was also frequently reported. The identification of the pathogen was made using cultures in about 90% of the total cases (89% EU vs. 91% non-EU), while the use of molecular biology was reported in 58% of the cases (78% EU vs. 45% non-EU). In the remaining cases, an identification was made by direct microscopy or histological examination.
Susceptibility testing was done in 26.6% of the total cases. Susceptibilities to antifungal agents and treatment regimens were quite heterogeneous due to the variety of isolated species. Surgery was performed in 68% of total cases. In total, 10% of patients were treated with surgery alone, with no antifungal therapy, though this approach was more commonly reported in Europe (in 17% of EU cases vs. 5% of non-EU cases). The most used antifungal agents were voriconazole in Europe and itraconazole outside of Europe, followed by posaconazole and amphotericin B. The majority of patients (67%) were treated with a single antifungal agent (58% rate of monotherapy in EU vs. 72% in non-EU), and the rest with more than one agent, in sequential or combination therapy. The median length of antifungal therapy was 16 weeks, but in 41.5% of reports, the duration of therapy was not specified. Regarding the clinical outcome, recovery was reported in 81% of cases, with no relevant differences between EU (81%) and non-EU (85%). Five percent of patients died due to the fungal infection.
Table 3. Reported cases in Europe.
Table 3. Reported cases in Europe.
YearRefCountrySexAgeDisseminationLocationSpeciesMethod of IdentificationTherapyDuration of Therapy in WeeksSurgeryTransplantOutcomeTime Tx-Diagnosis in MonthsSusceptibility
Test
2019[7]SpainM58LocalSkin, footAlternaria alternataCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ + VZL + TBF8NoLungFR42None
2019[7]SpainM68Local deepFoot tendonAlternaria alternataCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)Surgery-YesLungFR48None
2019[7]SpainM32LocalSkin, legs, and wristAlternaria alternataCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 24YesLungFR3None
2015[8]PortugalM65LocalSkin, hand, and legAlternaria alternataCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 12YesLiverFR6None
2019[9]ItalyM68LocalSkin, handAlternaria alternataCulture + molecular biologyISZ + PZL-NoKidneyFR48Yes
2020[10]ItalyF56LocalSkin, limbsAlternaria alternataCultureVZL24NoLiverFR108Yes
2019[7]SpainF53LocalSkin, legAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 28NoLungFR24None
2019[7]SpainM64LocalSkin, legsAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ + VZL 72NoLungFR2None
2019[7]SpainM51LocalSkin, legAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)Surgery-YesKidneyFR24None
2019[7]SpainM56LocalSkin, legAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 8YesKidneyFR25None
2019[7]SpainM46LocalSkin, legAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)Topic VZL 8YesLungFR18None
2017[11]SpainF72LocalSkin, legAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (18s + 28s rRNA)Surgery-YesKidneyFR180None
2012[12]PortugalM53LocalSkin, hands, and feetAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 40NoKidneyFR16None
2012[13]ItalyF64DisseminatedKidneyAlternaria infectoriaUndefinedTBF-YesKidneyFR-Yes
2016[14]Czech RepublicM61DisseminatedLungsAlternaria infectoriaCulture + molecular biology (ITS)VZL + PZL 28NoHeartFR12Yes
2020[15]SpainM46LocalSkin, legAlternaria spp. CultureVZL3YesLungFR24None
2014[16]SlovakiaM63DisseminatedSkin and brainCladophialophora bantianaCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)LAB-NoHeartDFI9Yes
2017[17]FranceF35DisseminatedCNS, spinal cord, and cerebellumCladophialophora bantianaCulture + direct microscopyLAB + PZL + FTS 36NoLungDOR120None
2016[18]BelgiumF34DisseminatedBone and brainCladophialophora bantianaCulture + molecular biologyVZL + LAB, ISZ + LAB, PZL + LAB + FTS-YesKidneyPR17Yes
2019[7]SpainM70LocalSkin, kneeCladosporium cladosporioidesCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)Surgery-YesKidneyFR10None
2013[19]SpainM25LocalSkin, legCurvularia lunataCulture+ direct microscopyITZ-YesKidneyFR18None
2018[20]FranceM51Local deepFoot tendon and skinDiaporthe raonikayaporumCulture + direct microscopySurgery-YesKidneyFR84None
2019[21]AustriaM76Local deepSternal woundExophiala dermatitidisMolecular biology (ITS sequence)FZL + ADF, VZL-YesLungDFI<1Yes
2019[7]SpainM58LocalSkin, legExophiala oligospermaCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)VZL 32YesLungDOR20None
2015[22]ItalyF65LocalSkin, handExophiala xenobioticaCulture + molecular biology (ITS)VZL, LAB, PZL 68YesKidneyFR18None
2019[23]SpainM65LocalSkin, footMedicopsis romeroiCulture + direct microscopy + molecular biology (ITS1 + ITS4)PZL 4YesLiverFR1Yes
2019[23]SpainF56LocalSkin, handMedicopsis romeroiCulture + direct microscopy + molecular biology (ITS1 + ITS4)VZL10YesKidneyFR -Yes
2020[24]FranceM30LocalSkin, footMedicopsis romeroiCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)VZL 8YesKidneyFR18None
2019[7]SpainM65LocalSkin, legMicrosphaeropsis arundinisCulture + molecular biology (18s-DNA, ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ + TBF54YesLungFR60None
2015[25]FranceM59LocalSkin, toes, and footNeoscytalidium dimidiatumCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)VZL 12NoKidneyFR8None
2015[25]FranceM49DisseminatedSkin, bones, and lungsNeoscytalidium dimidiatumCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)VZL-NoKidneyFR13Yes
2012[26]GermanyM69LocalSkin, leg, and abdomenOchroconis GallopavumCultureVZL12YesLungDOR72None
2012[26]GermanyM69DisseminatedSkin and lungOchroconis GallopavumCulture + direct microscopyVZL-YesLungDOR72None
2012[27]FranceM66LocalSkin, footPyrenochaeta romeroiMolecular biologySurgery, immunosuppression reduction-YesKidneyFR14None
2020[28]FranceM49LocalSkin, handTrematosphaeria griseaCulture + molecular biology (rDNA 28S D1-D2)ISZ + TBF84NoHeartFR3None
2017[29]FranceM71LocalSkin, legVeronaea botryosaDirect microscopy + molecular biologyPZL12YesHeartDOR7None
PZL = posaconazole. VZL = voriconazole. ITZ = itraconazole. LAB = liposomal amphotericin B. ISZ = isavuconazole. ADF = anidulafungin. CSF = caspofungin. TBF = terbinafine. FTS = flucytosine. FR = full recovery. DOR = death for other reason. DFI = death for fungal infection. ITS = internal transcribed spacer.
Table 4. Reported cases in the U.S.A.
Table 4. Reported cases in the U.S.A.
YearRefCountrySexAgeDisseminationLocalizationSpeciesMethod of IdentificationTherapyDuration of Therapy in WeeksSurgeryTransplantOutcomeTime Tx-Diagnosis in MonthsSusceptibility Test
2020[30]U.S.A.F54DisseminatedBrainAcrophialophora levisCulture + molecular biology (ITS)VZL-NoKidneyFR9Yes
2019[31]U.S.A.F64LocalSkin, limbsAlternaria alternataCulturePZL24YesHeartFR10None
2016[32]U.S.A.F65LocalSkin, armBiatriospora mackinnoniiCulture + molecular biology (rDNA D1-D2)ITZ 24YesKidneyFR2None
2011[33]U.S.A.M55DisseminatedBrainBipolaris spiciferaHistopathology + direct microscopyLAB + VZL 48NoHeartFR1.5Yes
2021[34]U.S.A.M69DisseminatedLung and brainCladophialophora bantianaCultureISZ + LAB-NoKidneyDFI36None
2017[35]U.S.A.M77Local deepSkin, leg, and feetExophiala oligospermaCultureITZ20YesKidneyFR-Yes
2019[36]U.S.A.F65Local deepSkin, footMedicopsis romeroiCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 2)PZL 12YesKidneyFR70Yes
2020[37]U.S.A.M64LocalSkin, legNigrograna mackinnoniiCulture + molecular biology (ITS2 + 28s-rRNA)PZL 3NoKidneyFR7None
2012[38]U.S.A.M49LocalSkin, legParaconiothyrium cyclothyrioidesCulture + molecular biology VZL, PZL 12NoKidneyFR18None
2014[39]U.S.A.F49DisseminatedLungPhaeoacremonium parasiticumCulture + direct microscopyPZL16NoKidneyFR72None
2022[40]U.S.A.M71LocalSkin, handPhialophora spp. Culture + molecular biology (ITS)ITZ-NoKidneyFR16None
2020[41]U.S.A.M40LocalSkin, handRhytidhysteron rufulumCulture + molecular biologyVZL 12YesKidneyFR-None
PZL = posaconazole. VZL = voriconazole. ITZ = itraconazole. LAB = liposomal amphotericin B. ISZ = isavuconazole. ADF = anidulafungin. CSF = caspofungin. TBF = terbinafine. FTS = flucytosine. FR = full recovery. DOR = death for other reason. DFI = death for fungal infection. ITS = internal transcribed spacer.
Table 5. Reported cases in South America.
Table 5. Reported cases in South America.
YearRefCountrySexAgeDisseminationLocalizationSpeciesMethod of IdentificationTherapyDuration of Therapy in WeeksSurgeryTransplantOutcomeTime Tx-Diagnosis in MonthsSusceptibility
2014[42]BrazilM68LocalSkin, handAlternaria infectoria, Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesCultureSurgery-YesKidneyFR35Yes
2019[43]ColombiaM66DisseminatedBrain and lungAlternaria spp. Culture + direct microscopyLAB + TBF 16NoKidneyDOR12None
2021[44]BrazilF46LocalSkin, faceBiatriospora mackinnoniiCulture + molecular biology (ITS 4 + ITS 5)ITZ -YesKidneyFR96None
2019[45]Colombia--DisseminatedBrainCladophialophora bantianaCulture+ direct microscopyVZL-YesKidneyFR60None
2016[46]BrazilM53LocalSkin, legExophiala spp. CultureITZ 20YesKidneyFR48None
2016[46]BrazilM59LocalSkin, legExophiala spp. CultureITZ 16YesKidneyFR16None
2016[47]BrazilM54LocalSkin, legExophiala bergeriCulture + molecular biology ITZ-NoKidneyFR24None
2019[48]BrazilM45LocalSkin, legExophiala xenobioticaCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 4)ITZ 12YesKidneyFR21Yes
2016[47]BrazilM75LocalSkin, limbsExophiala xenobioticaCulture + molecular biology ITZ-NoKidneyLost on follow-up12None
2016[47]BrazilM43LocalSkin, handFonsecaea monophoraCulture + molecular biology Surgery-YesKidneyFR24None
2016[47]BrazilM60LocalSkin, armFonsecaea pedrosoiCulture + molecular biology ITZ + surgery-YesKidneyFR36None
2016[47]BrazilM57LocalSkin, armFonsecaea spp.Culture + molecular biology TBF-NoKidneyFR1None
2017[49]ArgentinaM48LocalSkin, handGraphium basitruncatumCulture + molecular biology VZL + surgery-YesHeartFR48None
2015[50]French AntillesM71DisseminatedSkin, lung, and brainPhaeoacremonium parasiticum and Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioidesCulture + molecular biology VZL + LAB -YesKidneyDOR12Yes
2014[51]French AntillesF59LocalSkin, legPleurostoma oothecaCulture + direct microscopyPZL-NoKidneyFR168None
2016[47]BrazilF59LocalSkin, footUndefinedCulture + molecular biology ITZ + surgery-YesKidneyFR14None
PZL = posaconazole. VZL = voriconazole. ITZ = itraconazole. LAB = liposomal amphotericin B. ISZ = isavuconazole. ADF = anidulafungin. CSF = caspofungin. TBF = terbinafine. FTS = flucytosine. FR = full recovery. DOR = death for other reason. DFI = death for fungal infection. ITS = internal transcribed spacer.
Table 6. Reported cases in Asia.
Table 6. Reported cases in Asia.
YearRefCountrySexAgeDisseminationLocalizationSpeciesMethod of IdentificationTherapyDuration of Therapy in WeeksSurgeryTransplantOutcomeTime Tx-Diagnosis in MonthsSusceptibility Test
2015[52]ChinaM61LocalSkin, legAlternaria speciesCulture + direct microscopyITZ + VZL 7NoKidneyDOR12None
2020[53]JapanF40LocalSkin, legExophiala jeanselmeiCulture + direct microscopyITZ92YesKidneyFR72None
2017[54]India-16LocalSkin, legExophiala jeanselmeiCultureITZ 12YesKidneyFR11None
2016[55]IndiaF48LocalSkin, legExophiala jeanselmeiCulture + direct microscopyLAB + ITZ 6YesKidneyFR6None
2012[56]ChinaM66LocalSkin, armExophiala jeanselmeiMolecular biology (ITS sequence)Surgery + local injection and undefined systemic antifungal treatment-YesKidneyFR67Yes
2020[57]ChinaF47LocalSkin, handHongkongmyces snookiorumCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 2)VZL 8YesKidneyFR18Yes
2017[54]India 37LocalSkin, footNeoscytalidium speciesCultureITZ 24YesKidneyFR1None
2015[58]JapanF61LocalSkin, armPhaeoacremonium spp. Culture + direct microscopyLAB 2NoKidneyDOR156None
2021[59]ChinaM65DisseminatedLiverPleurostoma hongkongense sp. nov.Culture + molecular biology (ITS + 28s nr-DNA + 18s nr-DNA)ADF, LAB, VZL 14YesLiverFR16Yes
2019[60]ThailandM57DisseminatedLiverPleurostomophora richardsiaeCulture + molecular biology (ITS 1 + ITS 2)LAB 4YesLiverFR1Yes
2019[61]SingaporeM-LocalSkin, legPleurostomophora richardsiaeCulture + direct microscopyITZ40YesKidneyFR276None
2017[62]IndiaF43LocalSkin, legPyrenochaeta romeroiCulture + direct microscopyITZ + TBF, VZL8YesKidneyFR6None
2021[63]KuwaitF50DisseminatedLiver, brain, and lungRhinocladiella mackenzieiCulture + molecular biology (ITS)LAB + VZL6NoKidneyDFI3None
2013[64]Thailand69DisseminatedBrainScedosporium apiospermum and Phaeoacremonium parasiticumCulture + direct microscopyVZL 24NoKidneyPR168None
2017[54]India 21LocalSkin, footUndefinedCultureITZ 72YesKidneyFR6None
2017[54]India 22LocalSkin, handUndefinedCultureITZ 68YesKidneyFR6None
2017[54]IndiaF49LocalSkin, armUndefinedCultureITZ 48YesKidneyDOR12None
2017[54]India 43LocalSkin, footUndefinedCultureSurgery-YesKidneyFR6None
2017[54]India 23LocalSkin, footUndefinedCultureITZ 12YesKidneyFR5None
2022[65]IndiaF36DisseminatedSkin and boneUndefinedDirect microscopyUndefined-YesKidneyFR72None
2021[66]IndiaM50LocalSkin, foot, and legUndefinedCulture + direct microscopyITZ-YesKidneyPR24None
2021[66]IndiaM55LocalSkin, hand, and footUndefinedCulture + direct microscopyVZL + CSF-YesKidneyDOR3None
2021[66]IndiaM35DisseminatedSkin, foot, and peri-renal abscessUndefinedCulture + direct microscopyLAB-YesKidneyFR24None
2021[66]IndiaM52Local deepFacial skin and boneUndefinedCulture + direct microscopyLAB-YesKidneyFR17None
2021[66]IndiaM52LocalSkin, footUndefinedCulture + direct microscopyLAB-YesKidneyFR1None
2016[67]IndiaM37Local deepSalivary glandUndefined dematiaceous fungiDirect microscopyVZL-YesKidneyFR39None
2016[67]IndiaM37Local deepSalivary glandUndefined dematiaceous fungiDirect microscopyVZL-YesKidneyFR39None
PZL = posaconazole. VZL = voriconazole. ITZ = itraconazole. LAB = liposomal amphotericin B. ISZ = isavuconazole. ADF = anidulafungin. CSF = caspofungin. TBF = terbinafine. FTS = flucytosine. FR = full recovery. DOR = death for other reason. DFI = death for fungal infection. ITS = internal transcribed spacer.
Table 7. Reported cases in Australia.
Table 7. Reported cases in Australia.
YearRefCountrySexAgeDisseminationLocalizationSpeciesMethod of IdentificationTherapyDuration of Therapy in WeeksSurgeryTransplantOutcomeTime Tx-Diagnosis in MonthsSusceptibility Test
2015[68]AustraliaF49LocalSkin, legMicrosphaeropsis arundinisCulture + molecular biologyVZL 24NoKidneyFR84Yes
2015[68]AustraliaF70LocalSkin, leg, and armMicrosphaeropsis arundinisCulture + molecular biologyLAB + PZL 48YesKidneyFR4Yes
2015[68]AustraliaM55LocalSkin, armMicrosphaeropsis arundinisCulture + molecular biologyITZ 44YesKidneyFR30Yes
2016[69]AustraliaF67DisseminatedHeart and brainVerruconis gallopavaMolecular biologyVZL + ADF -NoKidneyDFI18Yes
PZL = posaconazole. VZL = voriconazole. ITZ = itraconazole. LAB = liposomal amphotericin B. ISZ = isavuconazole. ADF = anidulafungin. CSF = caspofungin. TBF = terbinafine. FTS = flucytosine. FR = full recovery. DOR = death for other reason. DFI = death for fungal infection. ITS = internal transcribed spacer.

4. Discussion

Phaeohyphomycosis (from the Greek word “phaeo” meaning “dark”) is caused by pigmented dematiaceous fungi and can cause a wide spectrum of clinical diseases, ranging from superficial to disseminated infections [6]. Immunocompromised hosts, including SOT recipients, are the most affected category of patients [35]. It is difficult to accurately determine the incidence of phaeohyphomycosis in the SOT population because of the rarity of the disease, and previous studies are limited to case reports and retrospective studies [3]. We report three cases of phaeohyphomycosis local infections in SOT recipients caused by Alternaria alternata, Alternaria infectoria, and Curvularia hawaiiensis. In our cases, the length of therapy and choice of intervention (surgery, antifungals, or both) for each clinical entity were based primarily on the clinical presentation, the underlying condition of the host, and the initial response. In the two heart recipients (case 1 and 2), because of a more intense immunosuppression and recent treatment of acute rejection, surgical excision with systemic antifungal therapy was chosen. The kidney transplant recipient (case 3) requiring a less intense immunosuppressive regimen, surgical excision, without antifungal treatment, and follow-up was considered to be sufficient. All three patients survived, with full recovery.
Though phaeohyphomycosis is a rare fungal infection, trends toward an increasing incidence have been noted. In our review, most of the cases (75%) were published in the last seven years, confirming the increasing trend observed in recent years and already described by Schieffelin et al. and by McCarthy [3,70]. This is likely a consequence of medical advancements allowing for increased transplantation rates, resulting in increasing numbers of immunosuppressed patients who are at risk for such opportunistic infections. Interestingly, we additionally found substantial differences in characteristics of affected patients and causative organisms between cases reported in the EU and the rest of the world. While kidney transplant recipients were most frequently reported to be diagnosed with phaeohyphomycosis in every country, surprisingly, lung transplant recipients were only reported in the EU. This is inconsistent with what was reported by the U.S.-based (Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network) TRANSNET cohort and Schieffelin at al. cohort, where 53% and 11% of the SOT recipients with phaeohyphomycosis were lung recipients, respectively [3,70]. This finding can be partially explained by the different time periods of the cases collection. We reviewed cases published from 2011 to 2022, Schieffelin at al. reported cases from 1988 to 2009, while in the TRANSNET cohort, cases were reported from 2001 to 2006. Regarding the time of onset of the infection, we found a median time from transplant to infection of 18 months; a similar time range was observed in the 2 cohorts previously mentioned. In our review, most of the infections described were localized to the skin and soft tissue. In fact, only 22% of them were disseminated to other organs. This finding is discordant with what is described in the TRANSNET cohort, where 63.3% of the infections were disseminated [3]. This can partly explain the higher mortality observed in the TRANSNET cohort since disseminated infections are more severe than local ones.
Our literature review revealed about 40 different species of fungi causing phaeohyphomycosis; Alternaria and Exophiala resulted to be the most reported genera. Previous studies have shown a similar distribution of genera, with Alternaria and Exophiala being the most common genera involved; however, fewer species were identified [3,70]. The increasing number of pathogens could be attributable to a wider use of molecular biology, which provides a more accurate species identification including unusual pathogens. In addition to species identification, antifungal susceptibility testing should be performed with a microscopic examination and culture. Despite the fact that the guidelines of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines [6] as well as the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (AST-IDCOP) [71] suggest obtaining a susceptibility test, in our review, we found that it was carried out only in about a third of cases (28% of cases in the EU vs. 26% in non-EU). Antifungal susceptibility testing could be useful to guide antifungal therapy; however, a correlation between in vitro MICs and patient outcomes is still debated due to the scarcity of robust clinical data. This is especially the case for rare fungal pathogens [72]. Therefore, the majority of therapies reported were empirical.
There are no standardized therapies for phaeohyphomycosis. ESCMID guidelines [6] suggest voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole as empirical therapy. These suggestions are reflected in the European cases of our review, in which voriconazole was widely used, followed by itraconazole and posaconazole. In the TRANSNET cohort, the most used antifungal agent was voriconazole (44%), while in Schieffelin et al.’s review, itraconazole was the most used agent for skin lesions, but a combination of voriconazole and amphotericin B was preferred for disseminated disease. Surgical resection was performed in 67% of the European patients, with 17% of them not receiving an antifungal therapy. Similarly, in non-EU countries, surgery was performed in 69% of cases, but only 5% did not receive antifungals. In Schieffelin et al.’s cohort, most of the patients received surgery (81%), not followed by antifungal therapy in 14% of the cases. Phaeohyphomycosis mortality is related to the dissemination of the disease. The mortality rate was 5% overall compared to 47% mortality in the TRANSNET cohort, probably due to the greater proportion of disseminated disease.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest review of the literature on phaeohyphomycosis in SOT recipients. These infections have not been studied in clinical trials and the available therapeutic data are primarily based on sporadic case reports. This review additionally highlights that a standardized approach to phaeohyphomycosis is difficult to determine due to the wide spectrum of dematiaceous fungi involved, different characteristics of the hosts, and the variety of clinical presentations. An early diagnosis and therapy are critical in preventing the dissemination of disease; therefore, in SOT recipients with atypical cutaneous lesions, a skin biopsy should always be performed. The diagnosis relies on a high index of clinical suspicion paired with an accurate mycological investigation. In addition to a histologic examination, culture and molecular biology identification are essential to establish an etiologic diagnosis in rare fungal diseases. As cases increase, further studies are becoming necessary to determine the optimal management strategy in this vulnerable immunosuppressed population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., A.C., D.L.P. and F.T.; methodology, F.C., G.D.M., E.D.C. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.P., F.T., A.M., A.C. and N.H.; writing—review and editing, D.L.P., A.M., A.C., P.A.G., M.S. and. N.H.; supervision A.M., P.G.C. and P.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy (Ricerca Corrente: RC 2022, Linea 1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All patient material was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were not applicable to this case report, and signed informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the case report are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Language review D.R. and W.B.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Revankar, S.G. Dematiaceous fungi. Mycoses 2007, 50, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. The contribution of melanin to microbial pathogenesis: Melanin and microbial pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2003, 5, 203–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McCarty, T.P.; Baddley, J.W.; Walsh, T.J.; Alexander, B.D.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Perl, T.M.; Walker, R.; Patterson, T.F.; Schuster, M.G.; Lyon, G.M.; et al. Phaeohyphomycosis in transplant re-cipients: Results from the Transplant Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Revankar, S.G. Phaeohyphomycosis in Transplant Patients. J. Fungi 2015, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, 3rd ed.; CLSI standard M38; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.; Guarro, J.; de Hoog, G.; Kathuria, S.; Arendrup, M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Akova, M.; Boekhout, T.; Caira, M.; et al. ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of systemic phaeohyphomycosis: Diseases caused by black fungi. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 47–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ferrándiz-Pulido, C.; Gomez, M.T.M.; Repiso, T.; Juárez-Dobjanschi, C.; Ferrer, B.; López-Lerma, I.; Aparicio, G.; González-Cruz, C.; Moreso, F.; Roman, A.; et al. Cutaneous infections by dematiaceous opportunistic fungi: Diagnosis and management in 11 solid organ transplant recipients. Mycoses 2019, 62, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brás, S.; Sabino, R.; Laureano, A.; Simões, H.; Fernandes, C.; Marques-Pinto, G.; Cardoso, J.; Veríssimo, C. Cutaneous infection by different Alternaria species in a liver transplant recipient. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2015, 8, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gasperina, D.D.; Lombardi, D.; Rovelli, C.; Di Rosa, Z.; Lepera, V.; Baj, A.; Nava, A.; Lombardi, G.; Grossi, P.A. Successful treatment with isavuconazole of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2019, 21, e13197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Campoli, C.; Ferraro, S.; Salfi, N.; Coladonato, S.; Morelli, M.C.; Giannella, M.; Ambretti, S.; Viale, P.L.; Cricca, M. Diffuse primary cutaneous infection by Alternaria alternata in a liver transplant recipient with pulmonary nocardiosis: Importance of prompt identification for clinical resolution. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 28, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aragón-Miguel, R.; Calleja-Algarra, A.; Morales-Raya, C.; López-Medrano, F.; Pérez-Ayala, A.; Rodríguez-Peralto, J.L.; Ortiz-Romero, P.L.; Maroñas-Jiménez, L. Alter-naria infectoria skin infection in a renal transplant recipient: An emerging phaeohyphomycosis of occidental countries? Int. J. Dermatol. 2017, 56, e153–e155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cunha, D.; Amaro, C.; Vieira, M.R.; Martins, M.D.L.; Maduro, A.P.; Inácio, J.; Afonso, A.; Pinto, G.M.; Cardoso, J. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria infectoria presenting as multiple vegetating lesions in a renal transplant patient. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2012, 29, 44–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tambasco, D.; D’Ettorre, M.; Bracaglia, R.; Massi, G.; Posteraro, B.; Torelli, R.; De Simone, C.; Capizzi, R. A Suspected Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Renal Transplant Recipient Revealing a Rare Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis by Alternaria infectoria. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2012, 16, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lyskova, P.; Kubanek, M.; Hubka, V.; Sticova, E.; Voska, L.; Kautznerova, D.; Kolarik, M.; Hamal, P.; Vasakova, M. Successful Posaconazole Therapy of Disseminated Alternariosis due to Alternaria infectoria in a Heart Transplant Recipient. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iturrieta-González, I.; Pujol, I.; Iftimie, S.; García, D.; Morente, V.; Queralt, R.; Guevara-Suarez, M.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Ballester, F.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; et al. Polyphasic identification of three new species in Alternaria section Infectoriae causing human cutaneous infection. Mycoses 2020, 63, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sládeková, M.; Pőczová, M.; Gašpar, M.; Vojtech, I.; Chupáčová, J.; Bujdáková, H.; Šoltýs, K.; Szemes, T.; Hanzen, J. First case of systemic phaeohyphomycosis due to Cladophialophora bantiana in Slovakia. JMM Case Rep. 2014, 1, e002659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reynaud, Q.; Dupont, D.; Nove-Josserand, R.; Durupt, S.; Persat, F.; Ader, F.; Grenet, D.; Durieu, I. Rare and unusual presentation of Cladophialophora infection in a pulmonary transplant cystic fibrosis patient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017, 19, e12789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Desmet, S.; Smets, L.; Lagrou, K.; Derdelinckx, I.; Neyt, J.; Maertens, J.; Sciot, R.; Demaerel, P.; Bammens, B. Cladophialophora bantiana osteomyelitis in a renal transplant patient. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2016, 12, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vásquez-Del-Mercado, E.; Lammoglia, L.; Arenas, R. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis due to Curvularia lunata in a renal transplant patient. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2013, 30, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ottaviani, S.; Gill, G.; Choudat, L.; Rioux, C.; Dieude, P. Nodule of Achilles tendon in a patient with kidney transplant revealing phaeohyphomycosis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2018, 57, 867–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klasinc, R.; Riesenhuber, M.; Bacher, A.; Willinger, B. Invasive Fungal Infection Caused by Exophiala dermatitidis in a Patient After Lung Transplantation: Case Report and Literature Review. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Los-Arcos, I.; Royuela, M.; Martín-Gómez, M.T.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Sellarès, J.; Perelló, M.; Castells, L.; Dopazo, C.; Gavaldà, J.; Len, O. Multifocal phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala xenobiotica in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2015, 17, 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  23. Los-Arcos, I.; Royuela, M.; Martín-Gómez, M.T.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Sellarès, J.; Perelló, M.; Castells, L.; Dopazo, C.; Gavaldà, J.; Len, O. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Medicopsis romeroi in solid organ transplant recipients: Report of two cases and comprehensive review of the literature. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2019, 21, e13072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jeddi, F.; Paugam, C.; Hartuis, S.; Denis-Musquer, M.; Sabou, M.; Lavergne, R.-A.; Muguet, L.; Le Pape, P. Medicopsis romeroi nodular subcutaneous infection in a kidney transplant recipient. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 95, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Garinet, S.; Tourret, J.; Barète, S.; Arzouk, N.; Meyer, I.; Francès, C.; Datry, A.; Mazier, D.; Barrou, B.; Fekkar, A. Invasive cutaneous Neoscytalidium infections in renal transplant recipients: A series of five cases. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brokalaki, E.; Sommerwerck, U.; von Heinegg, E.; Hillen, U. Ochroconis Gallopavum Infection in a Lung Transplant Recipient: Report of a Case. Transplant. Proc. 2012, 44, 2778–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ocampo, M.A.; Kanitakis, J.; Bienvenu, A.L.; Chauvet, C.; Euvrard, S. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Pyrenochaeta romeroi mimicking a plantar wart in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2012, 14, E173–E174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mercier, V.; Bastides, F.; Bailly, É.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Miquelestorena-Standley, E.; El Baz, Z.; Marteau, E.; Vermes, E.; De Muret, A.; Bernard, L.; et al. Successful Terbinafine Treatment for Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis Caused by Trematosphaeria grisea in a Heart Transplanted Man: Case Report and Lit-erature Review. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Welfringer, A.; Vuong, V.; Argy, N.; Chochillon, C.; Deschamps, L.; Rollin, G.; Harent, S.; Joly, V.; Vindrios, W.; Descamps, V. A rare fungal infection: Phaehyphomycosis due to Veronaea botryosa and review of literature. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2017, 15, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Modlin, C.E.; Collins, L.F.; Burd, E.M.; Lockhart, S.R.; Lyon, G.M. Acrophialophora levis brain abscess in a kidney transplant patient: A case report and review of the literature. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 28, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Margheim, A.; Malone, J.C.; Owen, C. Onset of disseminated cutaneous nodules following toe amputation in heart transplant patient. Dermatol. Online J. 2019, 25, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hughart, R.; Merrick, M.; Adelaja, O.T.; Bleasdale, S.C.; Harrington, A.; Tsoukas, M. Cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Bi-atriospora mackinnonii in a renal transplant recipient. JAAD Case Rep. 2016, 2, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rosow, L.; Jiang, J.X.; Deuel, T.; Lechpammer, M.; Zamani, A.A.; Milner, D.A.; Folkerth, R.; Marty, F.M.; Kesari, S. Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis caused by Bipolaris spicifera after heart transplantation: Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis due to Bipolaris. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2011, 13, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hernandez, C.; Lawal, F. Cerebral and pulmonary phaeohyphomycosis due Cladophialophora bantiana in an immunocom-promised patient. IDCases 2021, 25, e01240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oberlin, K.E.; Nichols, A.J.; Rosa, R.; Dejman, A.; Mattiazzi, A.; Guerra, G.; Elgart, G.W.; Abbo, L.M. Phaeohyphomycosis due to Exophiala infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Case report and literature review. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017, 19, e12723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lieberman, J.A.; Fiorito, J.; Ichikawa, D.; Fang, F.C.; Rakita, R.M.; Bourassa, L. Long-Term Carriage of Medicopsis romeroi, an Agent of Black-Grain Mycetoma, Presenting as Phaeohyphomycosis in a Renal Transplant Patient. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Puing, A.G.; Couture-Cossette, A.; Wang, A.X.; Zygourakis, C.C.; Cheng, X.; Stevens, B.A.; Banaei, N.; Novoa, R.A.; Ho, D.Y.; Subramanian, A.K. Simultaneous coccidioidomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report and literature review. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gordon, R.A.; Sutton, D.A.; Thompson, E.H.; Shrikanth, V.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Stielow, J.B.; Mays, R.; Oleske, D.; Morrison, L.K.; Lapolla, W.J.; et al. Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis Caused by Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 3795–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Monaganti, S.; Santos, C.A.Q.; Markwardt, A.; Pence, M.A.; Brennan, D.C. Pulmonary Phaeohyphomycosis Caused by Phaeoacremonium in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: Successful Treatment with Posaconazole. Case Rep. Med. 2014, 2014, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Derbyshire, M.; Beatty, C.; Matisko, M.; Karunamurthy, A.; English, J.C. Phialophora infection mimics pyogenic granuloma in a patient with a renal transplant. JAAD Case Rep. 2022, 28, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Braue, J.A.; Larue, R.W.; Boyd, A.S.; Fine, J.-D. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Rhytidhysteron rufulum. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2020, 45, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ogawa, M.; Reis, V.; Godoy, P.; De Menezes, F.G.; Enokihara, M.; Tomimori, J. Feohifomicosis causada por Colletotrichum gloeosporioides y Alternaria infectoria en un paciente trasplantado renal. Rev. Chil. Infectología 2014, 31, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Cardona, S.; Yusef, S.; Silva, E.; Bustos, G.; Torres, I.; Leal, R.; Ceballos-Garzon, A.; Josa, D.F. Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria spp.: A case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 27, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Reis, A.P.C.; Moreira, D.V.S.; Del Negro, G.M.B.; da Costa, A.C.; Benard, G.; Sousa, M.G.T.; Veasey, J.V. A case of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Biatriospora mackinnonii. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2021, 34, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nieto-Ríos, J.F.; Villafañe-Bermúdez, D.R.; Guerrero-Tinoco, G.A.; Ramírez-Sánchez, I.C.; Serna-Higuita, L.M.; Aristizábal-Alzate, A.; Ocampo-Kohn, C.; Varela, G.; Zuluaga-Valencia, G. Absceso cerebral por Cladophialophora bantiana en un paciente con trasplante renal: Reporte de un caso. Biomédica 2019, 39, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Oliveira WRP de Borsato, M.F.L.; Dabronzo, M.L.D.; Festa Neto, C.; Rocha, L.A.; Nunes, R.S. Phaeohyphomycosis in renal trans-plantation: Report of two cases. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2016, 91, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ogawa, M.M.; Peternelli, M.P.; Enokihara, M.M.S.S.; Nishikaku, A.S.; Gonçalves, S.S.; Tomimori, J. Spectral Manifestation of Melanized Fungal Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Report of Six Cases. Mycopathologia 2016, 181, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Espanhol, C.M.; Recuero, J.K.; Pagani, D.M.; Ribeiro, A.C.; Vettorato, G.; Duquia, R.P.; Luzzatto, L.; Scroferneker, M.L. Cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala xenobiotica: A case report. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2019, 27, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fernández, A.L.; Andres, P.O.; Veciño, C.H.; Nagel, C.B.; Mujica, M.T. Subcutaneous infection by Graphium basitruncatum in a heart transplant patient. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 21, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colombier, M.-A.; Alanio, A.; Denis, B.; Melica, G.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Levy, B.; Peraldi, M.-N.; Glotz, D.; Bretagne, S.; Gallien, S. Dual Invasive Infection with Phaeoacremonium parasiticum and Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides in a Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Comprehensive Review of the Literature of Phaeoacremonium Phaeohyphomycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2084–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Amazan, E.; Desbois, N.; Fidelin, G.; Baubion, E.; Derancourt, C.; Thimon, S.; Ekindi, N.; Quist, D. First case of phaeohyphomycosis due to Pleuro-stoma ootheca in a kidney transplant recipient in Martinique (French West Indies). Médecine St. Trop. 2014, 24, 323–325. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hsu, C.-C.; Chang, S.-S.; Lee, P.-C.; Chao, S.-C. Cutaneous alternariosis in a renal transplant recipient: A case report and literature review. Asian J. Surg. 2015, 38, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Takenaka, M.; Murota, H.; Nishimoto, K. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis due to Exophiala jeanselmei following renal trans-plantation: A case report with a published work review of phaeohyphomycosis in Japan. J. Dermatol. 2020, 47, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haridasan, S.; Parameswaran, S.; Bheemanathi, S.H.; Chandrasekhar, L.; Suseela, B.B.; Singh, R.; Rabindranath, J.; Padhi, R.K.; Sampath, E.; Dubey, A.K.; et al. Subcutaneous phaeohypho-mycosis in kidney transplant recipients: A series of seven cases. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017, 19, e12788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Joshi, P.; Agarwal, S.; Singh, G.; Xess, I.; Bhowmik, D. “A fine needle aspiration cytology in time saves nine”—Cutaneous phaeo-hyphomycosis caused by Exophiala jeanselmei in a renal transplant patient: Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology. J. Cytol. 2016, 33, 55. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou, X.; Hu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, K.; Wang, L.; Wei, Q.; Han, X.; Zhu, D.; Lu, Y.; Mao, Z.; et al. Cutaneous and subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala jeanselmei after renal transplantation: A case report. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao J. South. Med. Univ. 2012, 32, 1206–1210. [Google Scholar]
  57. Linqiang, D.; Yiguo, C.; Heping, X.; Dongke, C.; Longhua, H.; Xiaomei, G.; Xia, Z. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Hongkongmyces snookiorum in a kidney transplant patient: A case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sakata, Y.; Kitayama, A.; Yoshimura, R.; Anzawa, K.; Fujii, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Yokoyama, H.; Mochizuki, T. Case of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Phaeoacremonium sp. in a renal transplant recipient. J. Dermatol. 2015, 42, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tsang, C.-C.; Chan, K.-F.; Chan, W.; Chan, J.F.W.; Au-Yeung, R.K.H.; Ngan, A.H.Y.; Lin, K.P.K.; Lau, S.K.P.; Woo, P.C.Y. Hepatic phaeohyphomycosis due to a novel dematiaceous fungus, Pleurostoma hongkongense sp. nov., and importance of antifungal susceptibility testing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sribenjalux, W.; Chongtrakool, P.; Chayakulkeeree, M. Disseminated phaeohyphomycosis with hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis caused by Pleurostomophora richardsiae in a liver transplant recipient: A case report. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2019, 21, e13075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tee, L.Y.; Tan, B.H.; Tan, A.-L.; Busmanis, I.; Oh, C.C. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Pleurostomophora richardsiae in a renal transplant recipient. JAAD Case Rep. 2019, 6, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kulkarni, M.; Jamale, T.; Hase, N.; Ubale, M.; Keskar, V.; Jagadish, P.K. Subcutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis Caused By Pyrenochaeta Romeroi in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2017, 15, 226–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Al Otaibi, T.M.; Gheith, O.A.; Alobaid, K.; Nair, P.; Eldein, S.M.Z.; Mahmoud, T.S.; Halim, M.A.; Aboatya, H.H.; Balaha, M.A.; Nagib, A.M.; et al. Disseminated Rhinocladiella mackenziei in-fection in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report and literature review. J. Med. Mycol. 2021, 31, 101196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Larbcharoensub, N.; Chongtrakool, P.; Wirojtananugoon, C.; Watcharananan, S.P.; Sumethkul, V.; Boongird, A.; Jirasiritham, S. Treatment of a brain abscess caused by Scedosporium apiospermum and Phaeoacremonium parasiticum in a renal transplant recipient. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2013, 44, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Kamaleshwaran, K.; Ramkumar, E.; Pathak, V.; Mehta, S.; Kale, S. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomogra-phy/computed tomography image of rare case of phaeohyphomycosis causing osteomyelitis of scapula in a postrenal transplant recipient. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 37, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Prasad, P.; Elumalai, R.; Sekar, M.; Gunabooshanam, B.; Matcha, J. Phaeohyphomycosis in renal transplant recipients: A case series. Indian J. Nephrol. 2022, 32, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Patel, R.D. Pheohyphomycosis in Renal Transplant Recipient Presenting as a Rare Case of Submandibular Salivary Gland Swelling. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, ED05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Crawford, S.J.; Chen, S.C.A.; Halliday, C.; Rangan, G.K.; Gottlieb, T.; Reid, A.B. Microsphaeropsis arundinis skin and soft tissue infection in renal transplant recipients: Three case reports and a review of the literature. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2015, 17, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jennings, Z.; Kable, K.; Halliday, C.L.; Nankivell, B.J.; Kok, J.; Wong, G.; Chen, S.C.-A. Verruconis gallopava cardiac and endovascular infection with dissemination after renal transplantation: Case report and lessons learned. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2016, 15, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schieffelin, J.; Garcia-Diaz, J.; Loss, G.; Beckman, E.; Keller, R.; Staffeld-Coit, C.; Garces, J.; Pankey, G. Phaeohyphomycosis fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Clinical presentation, pathology, and treatment. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2014, 16, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shoham, S.; Dominguez, E.A. The AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice Emerging fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin. Transplant. 2019, 33, e13525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00069-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Clinical presentation of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis. (A) Curvularia hawaiiensis; (B). Alternaria alternata; (C). Alternaria infectoria.
Figure 1. Clinical presentation of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis. (A) Curvularia hawaiiensis; (B). Alternaria alternata; (C). Alternaria infectoria.
Jof 09 00283 g001
Figure 2. Alternaria alternata culture, the two sides of the plate.
Figure 2. Alternaria alternata culture, the two sides of the plate.
Jof 09 00283 g002
Figure 3. Alternaria alternata microscopy.
Figure 3. Alternaria alternata microscopy.
Jof 09 00283 g003
Table 1. Susceptibility test of the isolates.
Table 1. Susceptibility test of the isolates.
Antifungal AgentCurvularia hawaiiensis (mg/L)Alternaria alternata (mg/L)
Amphotericin B41
Anidulafungin0.0160.03
Micafungin0.0160.03
Caspofungin0.0160.125
Isavuconazole0.251
Posaconazole0.0160.06
Voriconazole0.0031
Itraconazole0.0030.25
Fluconazole416
MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; mg/L: milligrams/liter.
Table 2. Summarized results of the literature review.
Table 2. Summarized results of the literature review.
EU (n = 36)Non-EU (n = 58)Total (n = 94)
Age at disease presentation58.50 [49.50–65.75]54.00 [45.25–64.75]56.0 [47.25–65.00]
Transplant to diagnosis time18.00 [8.75–48.00]16.50 [6.00–45.75]18.00 [7.00–48.00]
Transplant Organ
    Kidney16 (44.4%)53 (91.4%)69 (73.4%)
    Lung13 (36.1%)0 (0.0%)13 (13.8%)
    Heart4 (11.1%)3 (5.2%)7 (7.4%)
    Liver3 (8.3%)2 (3.4%)5 (5.5%)
Sex, M28 (77.7%)31 (53.4%)59 (62.8%)
Dissemination
    Local26 (72.2%)40 (70.0%)66 (70.2%)
    Local deep3 (8.3%)4 (6.90%)7 (7.4%)
    Disseminated7 (19.4%)14 (24.1%)21 (22.3%)
Genus
    Alternaria16 (44.4%)4 (6.9%)20 (21.2%)
    Exophiala3 (8.3%)10 (17.2%)13 (13.8%)
    Cladiophialophora3 (8.3%)2 (3.4%)5 (5.3%)
    Medicopsis3 (8.3%)1 (1.7%)4 (4.3%)
    Other11 (30.6%)31 (53.5%) *42 (44.7%) *
    Not identified0 (0.0%)13 (22.4%)13 (13.8%)
Species identification
    Molecular biology28 (77.8%)26 (44.8%)54 (57.4%)
    Microscopy or histology6 (16.7%)19 (32.8%)25 (26.6%)
    Not done/reported4 (11.1%)13 (22.4%)17 (18.1%)
Susceptibility testing done10 (27.8%)15 (25.9%)25 (26.6%)
Treatment
    Antifungal alone12 (33.3%)18 (31.0%)30 (31.9%)
    Surgery alone6 (16.7%)3 (5.2%)9 (9.6%)
    Surgery + antifungal18 (50%)37 (63.8%)55 (58.5%)
Clinical outcome
    Recovery29 (80.6%)48 (82.8%)77 (81.9%)
* In three cases, two microorganisms were identified.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo Porto, D.; Cona, A.; Todaro, F.; De Carolis, E.; Cardinale, F.; Hafeez, N.; Di Martino, G.; Conaldi, P.G.; Sanguinetti, M.; Grossi, P.A.; et al. Phaeohyphomycosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Narrative Review of the Literature. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030283

AMA Style

Lo Porto D, Cona A, Todaro F, De Carolis E, Cardinale F, Hafeez N, Di Martino G, Conaldi PG, Sanguinetti M, Grossi PA, et al. Phaeohyphomycosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Narrative Review of the Literature. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(3):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo Porto, Davide, Andrea Cona, Francesca Todaro, Elena De Carolis, Francesca Cardinale, Neha Hafeez, Giuseppina Di Martino, Pier Giulio Conaldi, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Paolo Antonio Grossi, and et al. 2023. "Phaeohyphomycosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Narrative Review of the Literature" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 3: 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030283

APA Style

Lo Porto, D., Cona, A., Todaro, F., De Carolis, E., Cardinale, F., Hafeez, N., Di Martino, G., Conaldi, P. G., Sanguinetti, M., Grossi, P. A., & Mularoni, A. (2023). Phaeohyphomycosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Narrative Review of the Literature. Journal of Fungi, 9(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop