Next Article in Journal
Global Change Factors Influence Plant-Epichloë Associations
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolic Engineering of Pichia pastoris for the Production of Triacetic Acid Lactone
Previous Article in Journal
A Correlation between 3′-UTR of OXA1 Gene and Yeast Mitochondrial Translation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Methanol Utilization by Reducing Alcohol Oxidase Activity and Adding Co-Substrate of Sodium Citrate in Pichia pastoris
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production

1
School of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
2
Engineering Laboratory of Microbial Breeding and Preservation of Hebei Province, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
3
Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity Research and Application of Hebei Province, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040447
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 2 April 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Utilization of Yeast Resources)

Abstract

:
In this study, 99 strains of Aureobasidium species were isolated from various samples collected from different locations in China, among which 14 isolates showed different morphological characteristics to other strains identified as known Aureobasidium species. Based on morphological characteristics, those 14 strains were classified into four groups, represented by stains of KCL139, MDSC−10, XZY411−4, and MQL9−100, respectively. Molecular analysis of the internal transcriptional spacer (ITS) and part of the large ribosome subunit (D1/D2 domains) indicated that those four groups represent four new species in the Aureobasidium. Therefore, the names Aureobasidium insectorum sp. nov., A. planticola sp. nov., A. motuoense sp. nov., and A. intercalariosporum sp. nov. are proposed for KCL139, MDSC−10, XZY411−4, and MQL9−100, respectively. We also found that there were differences in the yield of exopolysaccharides (EPS) among and within species, indicating strain-related exopolysaccharide-producing diversity.

1. Introduction

Aureobasidium (Ascomycota: Dothideales) is a yeast-like fungal genus that is often called black yeast because of the production of melanin during its growth [1,2,3]. Species of Aureobasidium are widely distributed and normally possess multiple trophic modes. They are often found as saprophytes, endophytes, and pathogens in diverse environments, such as plant materials (roots, leaves, bark), water, marine sediments, swamps, soil, air, skin, and high osmotic environments (significant osmotic stress) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The species of Aureobasidium produce one-celled conidia of various shapes from hyaline and terminal, lateral, or intercalary conidiogenous cells [4,9].
The genus Aureobasidium was first described by Viala and Boyer based on the isolates on grape leaves [10]. Hermanides-Nijhof assessed the phenotypic variety of Aureobasidium and related genera, and distinguished Aureobasidium from the related enteric Hormonema according to the mode of conidial production. Aureobasidium produced synchronous blastoconidia from undifferentiated, hyaline cells, whereas Hormonema produced conidia in basipetal succession from hyaline or dark hyphae [4]. De Hoog and Yurlova revised Aureobasidium taxonomy based on the morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, and thus the genus included three species: Aureobasidium pullulans, A. melanogenum, and A. aubasidani [5,6,7]. In 2008, Zalar et al. carried out a molecular analysis of A. pullulans and A. melanogenum, and identified the studied strains as A. pullulans, A. melanogenum, A. subglaciale, and A. namibiae [8,9]. In recent years, with the high accessibility of sequencing services and a large amount of available molecular data, the number of novel Aureobasidium species is increasing. Thirteen new species have been proposed, namely, Aureobasidium acericola [10], A. aerium [11], A. castaneae [12], A. iranianum [13], A. leucospermi [14], A. mangrovei [15], A. microtermitis [16], A. mustum [17], A. pini [18], A. thailandense [19], A. tremulum [20], and A. uvarum and A. vineae [17].
With the increasing number of Aureobasidium species, its functional activities have been explored. For example, Aureobasidium species are resistant to Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifera as biological control agents, and they can also be used as sources of single-cell proteins [21,22]. Aureobasidium pullulans is often fermented to produce β-polymalic acid, laccase, liamocins, pullulan polysaccharides, and other commercial compounds [14,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Liamocins display pharmacological activities including anti-Streptococcus and anticancer [29]. Pullulan polysaccharides are non-toxic, tasteless, harmless, degradable, water-soluble, stable, film-forming, and present other excellent properties. As raw materials for food and cosmetics, pullulan polysaccharides are used for immune regulation, anti-tumor and anti-metastasis, relief of influenza and food allergy, and relief of stress [30].
Pullulan polysaccharides produced by A. pullulans have the properties of water retention, barrier formation, regeneration, whitening, hydrating, and repairing, and are added as an ingredient to cosmetic formulas. In order to screen an excellent A. pullulans to make a fermentation of excellent efficacy for cosmetics, we collected various samples from Tibet, Zhejiang, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Hebei, and other areas in China for strain isolation. Ninety-nine strains belonging to Aureobasidium were obtained, among which 14 strains were identified as four new species, based on morphological characteristics and molecular analysis of the internal transcriptional spacer (ITS) and part of the large ribosome subunit (D1/D2 domains).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Strain Isolation

Two hundred leaf samples of Sea buckthorn, willow, oak, crabapple, privet, camphor, and poplar collected from Motuo County in Tibet, and the Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, and Zhoushan regions in Zhejiang Province, were cut into small pieces under sterile conditions and soaked in 0.1% Tween 80. The Tween solution from the leaves was diluted 10 times and directly spread on a potato dextrose agar medium (PDA; 200 g potatoes, 20 g glucose, 20 g agar per L) containing chloramphenicol (0.1 mg/mL) and cultured at 28 °C for 48 h.
Ten insect samples were collected from Xiaowutai Mountain, Zhangjiakou region, Hebei Province. Insect samples with 75% alcohol disinfection were removed from the head and ground with a grinder, then soaked in 0.1% Tween 80. The Tween solution from the inset was diluted 10 times and directly spread on PDA containing chloramphenicol (0.1 mg/mL) and cultured at 28 °C for 48 h.

2.2. DNA Isolation, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

DNA was extracted using the CTAB method [31]. ITS region of ribosomal DNA and the D1/D2 domains of the ribosome subunit (LSU) were amplified and sequenced with the primer pairs of ITS1/ITS4 (ITS1 5′ —GTC GTA ACA AGG TTT CCG TAG GTG— 3′; ITS4 5′ —TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC— 3′) and NL1/NL4 (NL1 5′ —GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG— 3′; NL4 5′ —GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G— 3′) [32,33].
The PCR reaction was performed in the 25 µL reaction mixture containing 0.5 µL of each primer (10 pM/µL), 1.0 µL of genomic DNA (10 ng/µL), and 23 µL of 1 × PCR Master Mix buffer (T3 Super PCR Mix, 10 × 1.125 mL, Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Amplification was performed in an AB 2720 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), with the program consisting of 98 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 52 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 15 s, and the last elongation at 72 °C for 5 min.

2.3. Observation of Morphology

The isolates were cultured on PDA, oatmeal agar (OA; 30 g oatmeal, 20 g agar per L), and malt extract agar (MEA; 50 g malt extract, 20 g agar per L), and incubated in darkness at 25 °C for one week, in order to obtain morphological descriptions, including colony color and appearance. Fungal structures were transferred to microscope slides and mounted on 85% lactic acid drops. M40Y and M60Y media were prepared as described [15,19]. MEA media containing salt were prepared by adding analytical grade NaCl to the MEA prior to sterilization. Cultures were incubated at 25 °C unless otherwise noted.
The microscopes are equipped with LEICA DM2500 cameras (LECIA, Wetzlar, Germany) and use LASV4.13 software. At least 50 representative measurements were randomly selected and measured to calculate the average size.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

For phylogenetic analyses, 28 new ITS and LSU sequences were obtained from the present study, and 56 reference sequences from GenBank (Table 1).
ITS and D1/D2 sequences were aligned with the Muscle program in MEGA7 [34], and minor gaps in all alignments were manually deleted. The most appropriate model of DNA substitution was searched with MEGA7 [35]. The model GTR + I + G was selected for Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. ML analysis was carried out using MEGA7 [35] with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted using MrBayes 3.1.2 [34] with 10,000,000 generations, and parameter settings were proposed by Wang et al. [36]. The phylogenetic tree and the alignments were deposited in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org, accessed on 21 December 2022, No. 30010).

2.5. Exopolysaccharides Production

The starter cultures of the 29 strains (Table 2) were prepared by cultivating the strains in 50 mL of inoculum medium containing 10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone, and 20 g glucose per liter of distilled water at 25 °C for 3 days on a 150-rpm rotary shaker. Then, 5 mL of the starter culture was transferred to 100 mL synthetic medium containing 100 g sucrose, 1.7 g yeast extract, 5 g K2HPO4, 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.6 g (NH4)2SO4 and 1.0 g NaCl per liter of deionized water at 28 °C for 6 days on a 150-rpm rotary shaker, the culture obtained was centrifuged at 7104 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected. In order to precipitate exopolysaccharides, the cold ethanol was added to the obtained solution at a volumetric ratio of 2:1 v/v and the resulting mixture was kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C for 16 h [37]. The cold mixture was further centrifuged at 7104× g at 4 °C for 15 min and the pellet was dried overnight at 45 °C and then weighed to determine the yield of crude EPS production [38].
Table 1. Names, strains, locations, and hosts, and corresponding GenBank numbers of the taxa used in this study.
Table 1. Names, strains, locations, and hosts, and corresponding GenBank numbers of the taxa used in this study.
SpeciesStrainDateLocationLatitude and LongitudeSourceGenBank No.References
ITSD1/D2
Aureobasidium acericolaCDH 2020−10June 2020South Korea37°45′49.50″ N, 127°11′3.8″ EAcer pseudosieboldianumMT863788MT863787[10]
Aureobasidium aeriumCFCC 50324April 2015Sennon, Beijing, ChinaNAairON007058ON007081[11]
Aureobasidium castaneaCFCC 54591 *November 2021Jinjing Town, Changsha Hunan, China28°58′52″ N, 113°34′38″ ECastanea heryiNR_177551MW364275[12]
Aureobasidium caulivorumCBS 242.64NAOregon, AmericaNATrifolium incarnatumFJ150871FJ150944[39]
Aureobasidium insectorum sp. nov.KCL139September 2021Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China39°30′ N, 113°50′ Espittle insectsOP856707OP857208This study
LPL−1CSeptember 2022Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China29°53′28.86″ N, 122°24′59.35″ EleafOP856705OP857207This study
XZY65−10October 2019Shannan City, Tibet, China29°14′9.68″ N, 91°45′59.50″ EleafOP856706OP857206This study
L2PL−7ASeptember 2022Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China29°53′28.86″ N, 122°24′59.35″ EleafOP856715OP857216This study
T1−27−2November 2021Motuo County, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EleafOP856714OP857215This study
XZY249M1October 2019Nyingchi City, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EdeadwoodOP856713OP857214This study
XZY63−10October 2019Shannan City, Tibet, China29°14′9.68″ N, 91°45′59.50″ EleafOP856712OP857213This study
Aureobasidium intercalariosporum sp. nov.MGL11−3September 2022Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China29°53′28.86″ N, 122°24′59.35″ EleafOP856703OP857204This study
MQL9−100September 2022Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China29°53′28.86″ N, 122°24′59.35″ EleafOP856703OP857205This study
Aureobasidium iranianumCCTU 268June 2009Southern parts of IranNAbamboo stemsNR_137598NG_057049[13]
Aureobasidium khasianumNFCCI 4275December 2016Meghalaya, IndiaNAlitter samplesMH188305MH188306[40]
Aureobasidium leucospermiCBS 130593April 2008South AfricaNAleaves and stems of Proteaceae with cankers or leaf spotsNR_156246MH877257[14]
Aureobasidium liniCBS 125.21TNAUKNALinum usitatissimumFJ150897FJ150946[8]
Aureobasidium mangroveiIBRCM 30265TJanuary 2016Qeshm Island, Iran26°47′ N, 55°45′ Emangrove trees (Avicennia marina)NR_174637NG_078639[15]
Aureobasidium melanogenumCBS 105.22NANANAleafNR_159598NG_056960[8]
Aureobasidium microstictumCBS 342.66NAGermanyNAdying or dead leavesKT693743FJ150945[8]
Aureobasidium microstictumCBS 114.64NAWageningen, The NetherlandsNAHemerocallis sp.KT693744KT693986[8]
Aureobasidium microtermitisNANANANANAMW276135MW276136NA
Aureobasidium motuoense sp. nov.E82−2October 2019Motuo County, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EsoilOP856702OP857203This study
XZY411−4August 2019Motuo County, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EleafOP856710OP857211This study
E31−1October 2019Motuo County, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EsoilOP856709OP857210This study
E26−4October 2019Motuo County, Tibet, China29°19′37.128″ N, 95°19′53.76″ EsoilOP856708OP857209This study
Aureobasidium mustumAWRI 4233 CO−2020NASouth AustraliaNAgrape juiceNANA[17]
Aureobasidium namibiaeCBS 147.971997Namib Desert, NamibiaNAdolomitic marbleFJ150875FJ150937[8]
Aureobasidium piniCFCC 52778May 2018Miyun District, Beijing, China40°41′18″ N, 116°55′21″ Epine needles covered with myceliumMK184533MK184535[18]
Aureobasidium planticola sp. nov.MDSC−10September 2022Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China29°53′28.86″ N, 122°24′59.35″ EleafOP856711OP857212This study
Aureobasidium proteaeCBS 114273February 2006NetherlandsNAProtea sp.JN712491JN712557[15]
Aureobasidium proteaeCPC 13701July 1998Hilly Lands Farm, Somerset West, South AfricaNAProtea cv. ‘SylviaJN712490JN712556[15]
Aureobasidium pullulansCBS 584.751974FranceNAfruit of Vitis viniferaFJ150906FJ150942[8]
Aureobasidium pullulansCBS 146.30NAGermany, Ohlsdorf near HamburgNAslime flux of Quercus sp.FJ150902FJ150916[8]
Aureobasidium subglacialeEXF−2481June and August 2001Norway, Svalbard, Kongsvegen79° N, 12° Esubglacial ice from seawaterFJ150895FJ150913[8]
Aureobasidium thailandenseNRRL 58539T2006Nakhonratchasima, ThailandNAleaf of Cerbera odollumJX462674JX462674[19]
Aureobasidium thailandenseNRRL 585432006Prachuapkhirikhan, ThailandNAwood surfaceJX462675JX462675[19]
Aureobasidium tremulumUN 1NANANANAMK503657MK503660NA
Aureobasidium uvarumAWRI 4620 CO−2020NANANANANANA[17]
Aureobasidium vineaeAWRI4619 CO−2020NANANANANANA[17]
Selenophoma mahoniaeCBS 388.92NAColorado, AmericaNAMahonia repens, leafFJ150872FJ150943[8]
Sydowia polysporaCBS 750.71September 1969Quebec, Lac Normand, CanadaNAPinus strobus, twigMH872085MH872085[41]
* Note: Generated sequences and new strains in this study are indicated in bold. NA: Not available.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

The phylogenetic tree, based on a combined dataset of the ITS region and D1/D2 domain of the LSU sequences, was used to resolve the taxonomic position of the newly collected strains within Aureobasidium.
Fourteen newly isolated strains in this study were formed into four separate groups (Figure 1). Strains E82−2, XZY411−4, E31−1, and E26−4 were closely related to A. acericola, A. melanogenum and A. mustum, with 81% bootstrap support. Strains KCL139, LPL−1C, XZY65−10, L2PL−7A, T1−27−2, XZY249M1, and XZY63−10 formed a basal clade related to A. acericola, A. melanogenum, A. mustum, A. uvarum, A. vineae, A. aerium, A. subglaciale, A. leucospermi, and A. khasianum, but without support. MGL11−3 and MQL9−100 clustered together with a separate clade. Strain MDSC−10 located at a basal branch related to A. thailandense, A. microtermitis, and A. castaneae.

3.2. Taxonomy

3.2.1. Aureobasidium insectorum Q.M. Wang, F. Wu & M.M. Wang sp. nov.

Fungal names no: FN 571251
Etymology: Referring to the insect cicada, where the type of strain originated.
Colonies grew moderately on PDA, MEA, and OA (Figure 2), attaining 34 mm, 34 mm, and 27 mm diameters after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, respectively. Colonies on PDA were flat, smooth, pitch black with white fimbriate margins, and lacking aerial mycelium. Colonies on MEA were flat, felty, and greenish-black with white fimbriate margins. Colonies on OA were flat, whitish, and olivaceous black in the center, with sparse aerial mycelium. The growth diameters, sugar and salt tolerance, and different cardinal growth temperature of A. insectorum are shown in Table 3. A. insectorum can grow at 4–30 °C, and the optimum growth temperature is 28 °C. On MEA supplemented with 15% (w/v) NaCl, the diameters of A. insectorum attained 8–9 mm, while A. mangrovei and A. pullulans were 5 mm and 7 mm, respectively [10,19]. Thus, A. insectorum grew stronger on concentrations of 15% NaCl than its closely related species. A. insectorum grew stronger on moderate-sugar-level media (PDA) and M40Y, and weaker on M60Y. This species is suitable to grow on M40Y and PDA.
Mycelium hyaline were smooth, thin-walled, and 5.8–10.6 µm (av. = 8.0 µm) wide. Conidiophores were not developed. Conidiogenus cells were holoblastic, smooth, cylindrical, and 11.65–4.59 µm (av. = 7.16 µm) wide. Conidia were hyaline, aseptate, smooth walled, ellipsoidal to elongate-ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curved, 4.2–7.4 × 1.7–3.5 μm (av. = 5.2 × 2.8 μm), often polar or bipolar buds. Chlamydospore were 3.5–8.9 × 1.3–6.7 μm (av. = 6.5 × 5.4 μm), black, smooth, globose to ellipsoidal, septate or aseptate, and constricted at the septa (Figure 3).
Material examined: —CHINA, Hebei, Zhangjiakou, Xiaowutai Mountain, from cicada, L. Min, August 2021. (Holotype HMAS 352303; ex-type culture CGMCC 2.7207 = KCL139).
Notes—This species is phylogenetically close to A. aerium, A. intercalariosporum, A. leucospermi, and A. khasianum. These five species can be distinguished by the sizes of conidia (4.2–7.4 × 1.7–3.5 μm in A. insectorum, vs. 12.8–19.5 × 7.9–11.9 μm in A. aerium, vs. 8–13 × 5–9/8–24 × 2–10 μm in A. leucosperm, vs. 3–4 × 2–40 μm in A. khasianum, vs. 10.5–17.1 × 10.5–12.9 μm in A. intercalariosporum) [11,12,40].

3.2.2. Aureobasidium planticola Q.M. Wang, F. Wu & M.M. Wang sp. nov.

Fungal names no: FN 571262.
Etymology: Referring to the plant where the ex-type strain originated.
Colonies grew moderately on PDA, MEA, and OA (Figure 2), attaining 22 mm, 24 mm, and 30 mm diameters after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, respectively. Colonies on PDA were flat, pitch black, and pale grey in the center. Colonies on MEA were flat, felty, and brown, with white fimbriate at the margin. Colonies on OA had a smooth margin, and were flat, olivaceous black, compact, and lacking aerial mycelium. The growth diameters, sugar and salt tolerance, and different cardinal growth temperature of A. planticola are shown in Table 3. A. planticola can grow at 17–30 °C, and the optimum growth temperature is 28 °C. On MEA supplemented with 10% (w/v) NaCl, the diameters of A. planticola attained 7–8 mm, while its closely related species A. iranianum was 5 mm [13]. A. planticola can grow on moderate-sugar-level media (PDA), and on both M40Y and M60Y. This species is suitable to grow on M40Y.
Mycelium was dark-pigmented, smooth, thick-walled, branched, and 5.8–10.6 µm (av. = 8.0 µm) wide. Conidiogenous cells were holoblastic, located laterally or terminally, single or in clusters, grey-black to black, and 4.75–2.70 μm (av. = 4.2 μm). Conidia were 5.7–7.7 × 1.5–2.7 μm (av. = 5.2 × 2.8 μm), hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, and ellipsoidal to ovoid (Figure 4).
Material examined: —CHINA, Zhejiang, Zhoushan, Miaogen Mountain, from leaf, F, Zixuan, August 2022. (Holotype HMAS 352302; ex-type culture CGMCC 2.7199 = MDSC−10).
Notes—This species is phylogenetically related to A. thailandense and A. castaneae. These three species can be distinguished by the hyphae color (hyaline or brown in A. castaneae, vs. hyaline in A. thailandense, vs. dark black in A. planticola) [12,19].

3.2.3. Aureobasidium motuoense Q.M. Wang, F. Wu & M.M. Wang sp. nov.

Fungal names no: FN 571263.
Etymology: Referring to the location where the ex-type strain originated.
Colonies grew moderately on PDA, MEA, and OA (Figure 2), attaining 36 mm, 42 mm, and 27 mm diameters after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, respectively. Colonies on PDA were dark brown, with irregular black zones, and sparse aerial mycelium. Colonies on MEA were flat, brownish olivaceous, and white near the margin. Colonies on OA were flat, compact, and pitch black. The growth diameters, sugar and salt tolerance, and different cardinal growth temperature of A. motuoense are shown in Table 3. A. motuoense can grow at 17–37 °C, and the optimum growth temperature is 30 °C. At 37 °C, the diameters of A. motuoense were 7–8 mm, while its relative A. mangrovei was 5 mm [15]. A. motuoense can tolerate concentrations of up to 15% NaCl. A. motuoense grew stronger on moderate-sugar-level media (PDA), and on both M40Y and M60Y. This species is suitable to grow on M40Y.
Mycelium were hyaline to dark brown, smooth-walled, branched, and 1.3–12.7 µm (av. =8.3 µm) wide. Conidiogenous cells were 6.4–12.2 × 3.6–4.5 μm (av. = 8.7× 3.9 μm). Conidia were hyaline, smooth-walled, terminal, and mono- or bipolar budding. Chlamydospores were 12.2–16.2 × 9.6–10.4 μm (av. = 13.6 × 10.0 μm), black, smooth, and globose to elliptic (Figure 5).
Material examined: —CHINA, Tibet, Motuo County, from leaf, W, Guishuang, August 2019. (Holotype HMAS 352304; ex-type culture CGMCC 2.7206 = XZY411−4).
Notes—This species is phylogenetically related to A. melanogenum and A. acericola. The colonies of A. melanogenum on MEA/PDA at 25 °C attained 25 mm diameters after 7 d, appearing smooth and slimy due to abundant sporulation and EPS formation, olive-brown to black in the centre, mustard yellow towards the margin, and at the margin were yellowish white. The colony morphology of A. acericola is fast-growing, attaining diameters of 65 mm in 14 days, rapidly turning to olivaceous black, with dark green, irregular margins, covered with slimy masses of conidia, and mycelium immersed or no aerial mycelium [8,10].

3.2.4. Aureobasidium intercalariosporum Q.M. Wang, F. Wu & M.M. Wang sp. nov.

Fungal names no: FN 571252
Etymology: Referring to the morphology of intercalary chlamydospores.
Colonies grew moderately on PDA, MEA, and OA (Figure 2), attaining 34 mm, 27 mm, and 28 mm diameters after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, respectively. Colonies on PDA had an entire margin, and were floccose, greenish black, and white at the edge. Colonies on MEA had an undulate margin, and were flat, brownish olivaceous, grey at the centre, and white near the edge, with sparse aerial mycelium. Colonies on OA were flat, pale, and olivaceous brown to white from the middle to the edge.
The growth diameters, sugar and salt tolerance, and different cardinal growth temperature of A. intercalariosporum are shown in Table 3. A. intercalariosporum can grow at 17–30 °C, and the optimum growth temperature is 28 °C. On MEA supplemented with 15% (w/v) NaCl, the diameters of A. intercalariosporum attained 9–13 mm, while A. mangrovei and A. pullulans were 5 mm and 7 mm, respectively [8,16]. Therefore A. intercalariosporum grew stronger on concentrations of 15% NaCl than its closely related species. A. planticola grew on moderate-sugar-level media (PDA), and on both M40Y and M60Y. This species is suitable to grow on M40Y.
Mycelium was composed of branched, septate hyphae that occurred singly, and were verruculose to smooth, thin-walled, and 1.3–4.8 µm (av. = 3.2 µm) wide. Conidiogenous cells were undifferentiated, smooth, cylindrical, and 4.85–2.68 µm (av. = 3.54 µm) wide. Conidia were 10.5–17.1 × 10.5–12.9 μm (av. = 14.7 × 12.5 μm), smooth-walled hyaline, aseptate, ovoid, and ellipsoidal or elongated ellipsoidal. Chlamydospores were 10.5–17.1 × 10.5–12.9 μm (av. = 14.7 × 12.5 μm), deeply pigmented, smooth, thick walled, and globose to ellipsoidal (Figure 6).
Material examined: —CHINA, Zhejiang, Zhoushan, Miaogen Mountain, from leaf, F, Zixuan, August 2022. (Holotype HMAS 352305; ex-type culture CGMCC 2.7208 = MQL9−100).
Notes—This species is phylogenetically related to A. pini, A. planticol, A. khasianum, A. leucospermi, A. namibiae, A. pullulans, and A. proteae.
The main difference between the eight strains is conidia (10.5–17.1 × 10.5–12.9 μm in A. intercalariosporu, vs. 4.2–7.4 × 1.7–3.5 μm in A. planticola, vs. 6.2–8.5 × 3.6–4.2 μm in A. pini, vs. 7–17 × 3.5–7 μm in A. namibiae, vs. 8–11 × 4–5 μm in A. leucospermi, vs. 7.5–16 × 3.5–7 μm in A. pullulans [8,14].

3.3. Exopolysaccharides Production

Ninety-nine Aureobasidium strains were isolated from different leaf and insect samples. Twenty-nine strains among them were selected to evaluate the exopolysaccharides production capacity (Table 3). PTSL19-104 and PTSL20-104 had the highest exopolysaccharide yield, which was 54.8 g/L and 52.33 g/L, respectively. The exopolysaccharides production capacity of Aureobasidium strains was different between species. A. melanogenum had a strong exopolysaccharide production capacity, with an average exopolysaccharide production of 39.06 g/L. A. thailandense was the weakest, with an average exopolysaccharide production of 6.17 g/L. As the interspecific hetero, the intraspecific differences also existed in the production capacity of exopolysaccharides. For example, the lowest sugar production of A. melanogenum strain was 1.53 g/L, and the highest sugar production was 54.58 g/L. The strains in the same branch of the phylogenetic tree have the same apparent and microscopic morphology, but the exopolysaccharides yields produced by fermentation are different. For example, the exopolysaccharides yields of four strains among A. motuoense are 15.74 g/L, 21.39 g/L, 31.72 g/L, and 37.43 g/L, respectively. In summary, there were differences in exopolysaccharides production capacity among species. Although strain morphology and molecular sequence were consistent within species, there were differences in physiological functions such as exopolysaccharides production capacity.

4. Discussion

The species of Aureobasidium are widely distributed globally in various habitats, such as house dust, air, tree surfaces (such as needles of Pinus tabuliformis, Acer pseudosieboldianum, Bintaro plants, Castanea henryi, and Castanea mollissima), plant interiors, seawater, sea ice and glacial meltwaters, water and sediment samples, soil, and subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis from the US, Canada, Korea, Indonesia, China, the Arctic coast, and Brittany (France) [1,8,10,11,18,21,23]. In this study, many strains were isolated from soil and plant leaves, but strain KCL139 was isolated from the surface of a spittle insect. Yeasts occur commonly on insect species, and the number of insect-related yeasts had increased in the last 10 years reaching a ratio of 7.25% [42,43,44], compared with the report of Boekhout [45]. However, according to our knowledge, Aureobasidium species isolated from insects are rare. Our finding not only expands the ecology niches of Aureobasidium, but also supports the ‘dispersal–encounter’ hypothesis proposed by Madden et al. [46].
The four new species described in this study have different growth temperatures from each other (Table 2). They can grow at 17 °C, 28 °C and 30 °C; however, only A. motuoense can tolerate a high temperature of 37 °C, a feature associated with the climate characteristics of Motuo County where this new species was collected. Motuo County boasts a typical sub-tropical moist climate. The optimum growth temperature for A. planticola, A. intercalariosporum, and A. insectorum is 28 °C, whereas A. motuoens is 30 °C. A. planticola, A. intercalariosporum, and A. motuoense fail to grow at 4 °C, whereas A. insectorum grows at this temperature normally. Unfortunately, the psychrophilic character of A. insectorum cannot be explained based on the present data. A. planticola, A. motuoens, and A. insectorum can grow on MEA supplemented with 15% (w/v) NaCl, but A. planticola can only tolerate concentrations of up to 5% NaCl. All tested Aureobasidium species [10], can grow on 10% NaCl MEA, and most of them can tolerate concentrations of 10% NaCl. Only A. planticola is intolerant to more than 10% NaCl. A. planticola shows good growth on the M40Y medium, while the other strains grow well on the PDA medium.
The study of Zou et al. [47] showed that A. pullulans produced polymalic acid by fermentation, and strains ZD-3d, IP-1, Sp. P6, MCW, and ZX-10 produced 57.2 g/L, 57.4 g/L, 91.1 g/L, and 117.4 g/L, respectively, which indicated that different strains could produce different yields of polymalic acid at the same fermentation conditions. In this paper, we found that different strains of the same species, such as A. insectorum, A. leucospermi, A. motuoense, and A. melanogenum, produced pullulan ranging from 0.92 to 54.58 g/L (Table 3), which in agreement with the result from Haghighatpanah et al. [37], shows that there were differences in exopolysaccharides production within the same species. Our results also showed that different Aureobasidium species have great differences in their exopolysaccharides production capacity. Therefore, we should screen more diverse environments to isolate strains of certain species for comprehensive study in exploring Aureobasidium compounds for industrial application.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 14 strains of Aureobasidium isolated from Tibet, Hebei, and Zhejiang are proposed as four new species based on molecular analysis of their ITS and large ribosomal subunits of D1/D2 domains. The new species are named as Aureobasidium insectorum sp. nov., A. planticola sp. nov., A. motuoense sp. nov., and A. intercalariosporum sp. nov. We found differences in interspecific and intraspecific exopolysaccharides production between the species, indicating the diversity in strain-specific exopolysaccharides production. Aureobasidium has strong adaptability and wide distribution, and there may be many new Aureobasidium taxa in nature, which have the potential to produce new metabolites. Therefore, studies into the species diversity of this genus and the industrial application of its metabolites are of great significance.

Author Contributions

Q.W. conceived and designed the project. F.W. and Z.F. performed sampling and yeasts isolation. F.W., M.W., Z.F. and Q.W. performed phenotypic characterization and analyzed the molecular data. F.W., M.W. and Q.W. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants No. 319611330200 and No. 31770018 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), No. 2021FY100900 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, and No. 521000981388 from the Advanced Talents Incubation Program of the Hebei University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All newly generated sequence data are available in NCBI GenBank. The phylogenetic tree and the alignments were deposited in TreeBASE.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hymphries, Z.; Seifert, K.A.; Hirooka, Y.; Visagie, M. A new family and genus in Dothideales for Aureobasidium-like species isolated from house dust. IMA Fungus 2017, 8, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Thambugala, K.M.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Li, Y.M.; Boonmee, S.; Hongsanan, S.; Tian, Q.; Singtripop, C.; Bhat, D.J.; Camporesi, E.; Jayawardena, R.; et al. Dothideales. Fungal Divers. 2014, 68, 105–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Crous, P.W.; Kirk, P.M.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Dai, D.Q.; D’souza, M.J.; Diederich, P.; Dissanayake, A.; et al. Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes–2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names. Fungal Divers. 2014, 69, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hermanides-Nijhof, E.J. Aureobasidium and allied genera. Stud. Mycol. 1977, 15, 141–177. [Google Scholar]
  5. De Hoog, G.S.; Yurlova, N.A. Conidiogenesis, nutritional physiology and taxonomy of Aureobasidium and Hormonema. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1994, 65, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Hoog, G.S.; Zalar, P.; Urzi, C.; De Leo, F.; Yurlova, N.A.; Sterflinger, K. Relationships of dothideaceous black yeasts and meristematic fungi based on 5.8 S and ITS2 rDNA sequence comparison. Stud. Mycol. 1999, 43, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yurlova, N.A.; Uijthof, J.M.J.; De Hoog, G.S. Distinction of species in Aureobasidium and related genera by PCR-ribotyping. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996, 69, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zalar, P.; Gostinčar, C.; De Hoog, G.S.; Uršič, V.; Sudhadham, M.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Redefinition of Aureobasidium pullulans and its varieties. Stud. Mycol. 2008, 61, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gostinčar, C.; Ohm, R.A.; Kogej, T.; Sonjak, S.; Turk, M.; Zajc, J.; Zalar, P.; Grube, M.; Sun, H.; Han, J.; et al. Genome sequencing of four Aureobasidium pullulans varieties: Biotechnological potential, stress tolerance, and description of new species. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, D.H.; Cho, S.E.; Oh, J.Y.; Cho, E.J.; Kwon, S. A novel species of Aureobasidium (Dothioraceae) recovered from Acer pseudosieboldianum in Korea. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 2021, 14, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, C.B.; Jiang, N.; Zhu, Y.Q.; Xue, H.; Li, Y. Aureobasidium aerium (Saccotheciaceae, Dothideales), a new yeast-like fungus from the air in Beijing, China. Phytotaxa 2022, 544, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, N.; Fan, X.; Tian, C. Identification and Characterization of Leaf-Inhabiting Fungi from Castanea Plantations in China. J. Fungi 2021, 18, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arzanlou, M. Aureobasidium iranianum, a new species on bamboo from Iran. Mycosphere 2012, 3, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Crous, P.W.; Summerell, B.A.; Swart, L.; Denman, S.; Taylor, J.E.; Bezuidenhout, C.M.; Palm, M.E.; Marincowitz, S.; Groenewald, J.Z. Fungal pathogens of Proteaceae. Persoonia 2011, 27, 20–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nasr, S.; Mohammadimehr, M.; Geranpayeh Vaghei, M.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Shahzadeh Fazeli, S.A. Aureobasidium mangrovei sp. nov., an ascomycetous species recovered from Hara protected forests in the Persian Gulf, Iran. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 1697–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crous, P.W.; Cowan, D.A.; Maggs-Kölling, G.; Yilmaz, N.; Thangavel, R.; Wingfield, M.J.; Noordeloos, M.E.; Dima, B.; Brandrud, T.; Jansen, G.M.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets. Persoonia 2021, 46, 313–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Onetto, C.A.; Schmidt, S.A.; Roach, M.J.; Borneman, A.R. Comparative genome analysis proposes three new Aureobasidium species isolated from grape juice. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020, 20, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, N.; Liang, Y.M.; Tian, C.M. Aureobasidium pini sp. nov. from pine needle in China. Phytotaxa 2019, 402, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peterson, S.; Manitchotpisit, P.; Leathers, T. Aureobasidium thailandense sp. nov. isolated from leaves and wooden surfaces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 63, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Sharma, R.; Mughini, G.; Noordeloos, M.E.; Santini, A.; Shouche, Y.S.; Bezerra, J.D.P.; Dima, B.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets. Persoonia 2019, 44, 291–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prasongsuk, S.; Lotrakul, P.; Ali, I.; Bankeeree, W.; Punnapayak, H. The current status of Aureobasidium pullulans in biotechnology. Folia Microbiol. 2018, 63, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sharma, R.R.; Singh, D.; Singh, R. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review. Biol. Control 2009, 50, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manitchotpisit, P.; Leathers, T.D.; Peterson, S.W.; Kurtzman, C.P.; Li, X.L.; Eveleigh, D.E.; Lotrakul, P.; Prasongsuk, S.; Dunlap, C.A.; Vermillion, K.E.; et al. Multilocus phylogenetic analyses, pullulan production and xylanase activity of tropical isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kutleša, M.; Mlinarić-Missoni, E.; Hatvani, L.; Voncina, D.; Simon, S.; Lepur, D.; Baršić, B. Chronic fungal meningitis caused by Aureobasidium proteae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 73, 271–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Leathers, T.D. Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 62, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, K.C.; Demirci, A.; Catchmark, J.M. Pullulan: Biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Manitchotpisit, P.; Skory, C.D.; Peterson, S.W.; Price, N.P.J.; Vermillion, K.E.; Leathers, T.D. Poly (β-L-malic acid) production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 39, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muthusamy, S.; Anandharaj, S.J.; Kumar, P.S. Microbial pullulan for food, biomedicine, cosmetic, and water treatment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 3199–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, X.X.; Jia, S.L.; Wei, X.; Zhang, M.; Liu, G.L.; Hu, Z.; Chi, Z.; Chi, Z.M. Liamocins biosynthesis, its regulation in Aureobasidium spp., and their bioactivities. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Suzuki, T.; Kusano, K.; Kondo, N.; Nishikawa, K.; Kuge, T.; Ohno, N. Biological Activity of High-Purity β-1,3-1,6-Glucan Derived from the Black Yeast Aureobasidium pullulans: A Literature Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xin, Z.; Chen, J. A high throughput DNA extraction method with high yield and quality. Plant Methods 2012, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification, and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, D.; Wu, L.C.; Rinaldi, M.G.; Lehmann, P.F. Three distinct genotypes within Candida parapsilosis from clinical sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kurtzman, C.P.; Robnett, C.J. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5′ end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 1216–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, Q.M.; Begerow, D.; Groenewald, M.; Liu, X.; Theelen, B.; Bai, F.Y.; Boekhout, T. Multigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of yeasts and related fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 81, 55–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Haghighatpanah, N.; Mirzaee, H.; Khodaiyan, F.; Kennedy, J.F.; Aghakhani, A.; Hosseini, S.S.; Jahanbin, K. Optimization and characterization of pullulan produced by a newly identified strain of Aureobasidium pullulans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Buksa, K.; Kowalczyk, M.; Boreczek, J. Extraction, purification and characterisation of exopolysaccharides produced by newly isolated lactic acid bacteria strains and the examination of their influence on resistant starch for-mation. Food Chem. 2021, 362, 130221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; de Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prabhugaonkar, A.; Jalmi, P. Aureobasidium khasianum (Aureobasidiaceae) a novel species with distinct morphology. Phytotaxa 2018, 374, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Verkley, G.J.; Starink-Willemse, M.; van Iperen, A.; Abeln, E.C. Phylogenetic analyses of Septoria species based on the ITS and LSU-D2 regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mycologia 2004, 96, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Groenewald, M.; Boundy-Mills, K.; Čadež, N.; Endoh, R.; Jindamorakot, S.; Pohl-Albertyn, C.; Rosa, C.A.; Turchetti, B.; Yurkov, A. Census of yeasts isolated from natural ecosystem and conserved in worldwide collections. In Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Diversity; Buzzini, P., Lachance, M.A., Yurkov, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 455–476. [Google Scholar]
  43. Blackwell, M. Yeasts in Insects and Other Invertebrates. In Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Diversity; Buzzini, P., Lachance, M.A., Yurkov, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 397–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Boekhout, T.; Amend, A.S.; EI Baidouri, F.; Gabaldón, T.; GemI, J.; Mittelbach, M.; Rober, V.; Tan, C.S.; Turchetti, B.; Vu, D.; et al. Trends in yeast diversity discovery. Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 491–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Boekhout, T. Biodiversity: Gut feeling for yeasts. Nature 2005, 434, 449–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Madden, A.A.; Epps, M.J.; Fukami, T.; Irwin, R.E.; Sheppard, J.; Sorger, D.M.; Dunn, R.R. The ecology of insect-yeast relationships and its relevance to human industry. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20172733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zou, X.; Cheng, C.; Feng, J.; Song, X.; Lin, M.; Yang, S.T. Biosynthesis of polymalic acid in fermentation: Advances and prospects for industrial application. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 408–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the combined sequences of the ITS (including 5.8S rDNA) and LSU rDNA D1/D2 domains, depicting the phylogenetic positions of new taxa (in bold) within Aureobasidium. Bootstrap percentages of maximum likelihood analysis over 50% from 1000 bootstrap replicates and Bayesian inference higher than 0.9 (PP > 0.9) are shown on the deep and major branches. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Note: -, not supported (BP < 50% or PP < 0.9). The new taxa isolated in this study are shown in bold.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the combined sequences of the ITS (including 5.8S rDNA) and LSU rDNA D1/D2 domains, depicting the phylogenetic positions of new taxa (in bold) within Aureobasidium. Bootstrap percentages of maximum likelihood analysis over 50% from 1000 bootstrap replicates and Bayesian inference higher than 0.9 (PP > 0.9) are shown on the deep and major branches. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Note: -, not supported (BP < 50% or PP < 0.9). The new taxa isolated in this study are shown in bold.
Jof 09 00447 g001
Figure 2. Colony characteristics of analyzed strains. (AD): A. insectorum KCL139 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (EH): A. planticola MDSC−10 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (IL): A. motuoense XZY411−1 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (MP): A. intercalariosporum MQL9−100 PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively.
Figure 2. Colony characteristics of analyzed strains. (AD): A. insectorum KCL139 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (EH): A. planticola MDSC−10 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (IL): A. motuoense XZY411−1 on PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively. (MP): A. intercalariosporum MQL9−100 PDA, PDA, MEA, and OA, respectively.
Jof 09 00447 g002
Figure 3. A. insectorum (CGMCC 2.7207- ex-type-culture). (AC): Conidia. (D): Chlamydospores. (EG): Conidiogenus cells. Scale bar: (AG) = 10 μm.
Figure 3. A. insectorum (CGMCC 2.7207- ex-type-culture). (AC): Conidia. (D): Chlamydospores. (EG): Conidiogenus cells. Scale bar: (AG) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00447 g003
Figure 4. A. planticola (CGMCC 2.7199 ex-type culture). (AF): Conidiogenous cells and thick-walled hyphae. Scale bar: (AF) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. A. planticola (CGMCC 2.7199 ex-type culture). (AF): Conidiogenous cells and thick-walled hyphae. Scale bar: (AF) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00447 g004
Figure 5. A. motuoense (CGMCC 2.7206 ex-type culture). (A): Conidia. (BD): Hyphae and conidiogenous cells. (E,F): Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (AF) = 10 μm.
Figure 5. A. motuoense (CGMCC 2.7206 ex-type culture). (A): Conidia. (BD): Hyphae and conidiogenous cells. (E,F): Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (AF) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00447 g005
Figure 6. A. intercalariosporum (CGMCC 2.7208 ex-type culture). (A,E): Hyphae and conidiogenus cells. (B,D): Conidia. (C,F): Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (AF) = 10 μm.
Figure 6. A. intercalariosporum (CGMCC 2.7208 ex-type culture). (A,E): Hyphae and conidiogenus cells. (B,D): Conidia. (C,F): Chlamydospores. Scale bars: (AF) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00447 g006
Table 2. Exopolysaccharides production yield (EPY) of Aureobasidium.
Table 2. Exopolysaccharides production yield (EPY) of Aureobasidium.
StrainSpeciesFermentation Liquid ColorExopolysaccharides Yield (g/L)Average Weight (g/L)
PTSL5−5A. thailandenseLight yellow8.476.17
PTSL4−6A. thailandenseLight yellow8.09
PTSL5−3A. thailandenseLight yellow2.71
PTSL11−5A. thailandenseLight yellow5.42
PTSL9−106A. melanogenumPink1.5339.06
PTSL19−101A. melanogenumLight yellow32.53
PTSL6−101A. melanogenumLight yellow34.50
PTSL19−107A. melanogenumYellow41.84
PTSL19−104A. melanogenumYellow54.58
PTSL20−102A. melanogenumLight yellow48.13
PTSL20−104A. melanogenumYellow52.33
PTSL19−104A. melanogenumLight yellow45.71
PTSL19−104A. melanogenumLight yellow45.71
PTSL17−4A. melanogenumLight yellow34.36
PTSL9−100A. melanogenumLight yellow38.45
LF75−2A. leucospermiLight yellow0.9217.24
SXY35−16A. leucospermiLight yellow28.94
SXY35−15A. leucospermiLight yellow23.37
LF45−2A. leucospermiLight yellow15.75
LPL−7AA. insectorumLight yellow27.6714.7
KCL139A. insectorumDark yellow8.64
XZY65−10A. insectorumDark yellow7.80
E26−4A. motuoenseYellow15.7426.57
E31−1A. motuoenseDark yellow21.39
XZY411−4A. motuoenseDark yellow31.72
E82−2A. motuoenseDark yellow37.43
MGL11−3A. intercalariosporumLight yellow29.4331.79
MQL9−100A. intercalariosporumLight yellow34.15
MDSC−10A. planticolaBlack2.102.1
Table 3. Diameter (mm) of four strain colonies under different conditions and on different media. The growth temperature was 25 °C unless noted otherwise and incubation was for 7 d.
Table 3. Diameter (mm) of four strain colonies under different conditions and on different media. The growth temperature was 25 °C unless noted otherwise and incubation was for 7 d.
Aureobasidium planticolaAureobasidium intercalariosporumAureobasidium motuoenseAureobasidium insectorum
PDA22–2532–3634–3832–35
M40Y33–4035–4041–4332–34
M60Y27–3429–3436–4025–27
MEA + 5% NaCl14–1514–1713–159–12
MEA + 10% NaCl7–88–1110–118–8
MEA + 15% NaCl09–135–88–9
MEA + 20% NaCl0000
MEA at 4 °C0005–5
MEA at 17 °C10–1313–158–1312–15
MEA at 28 °C27–2724–2532–3528–28
MEA at 30 °C11–1013–1438–447–8
MEA at 37 °C007–80
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, F.; Feng, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, Q. Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040447

AMA Style

Wu F, Feng Z, Wang M, Wang Q. Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(4):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Feng, Zixuan Feng, Manman Wang, and Qiming Wang. 2023. "Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 4: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040447

APA Style

Wu, F., Feng, Z., Wang, M., & Wang, Q. (2023). Proposal of Four New Aureobasidium Species for Exopolysaccharide Production. Journal of Fungi, 9(4), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop