Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Carboxymethyl Chitosan–Genipin Hydrogels as Reservoir Systems for Suramin Delivery in Epithelial Tissues
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Physicochemical Properties of High-Temperature-Resistant Polymer Gel Resin Composite Plugging Material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adsorbents Based on Acrylamide Hydrogels and Cryogels for Water Purification from Radioactive Contaminants

1
Institute of Radiation Safety and Ecology of National Nuclear Center of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Kurchatov 180010, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
3
Department of Chemistry and Ecology, Research School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Shakarim University of Semey, Semey 071412, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2025, 11(5), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050311
Submission received: 18 February 2025 / Revised: 17 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Gel Applications)

Abstract

:
The article presents the assessment results on the effectiveness of polymer hydrogel and cryogel-based adsorbents for treating natural waters from radioactive contaminants. Nine polymer gels were synthesized, their physico-chemical properties studied, and the processes of selective adsorption of radioactive elements such as 137Cs, 90Sr, and other chemical elements in aqueous solutions were investigated using polymer gels. The effectiveness of radioactive element adsorption from aqueous solutions by polymer hydrogels and cryogels was evaluated by placing different pure samples of the synthesized gels in radioactively contaminated aqueous solutions. At the same time, the activity of the aqueous solution was measured before placing the polymer gel into it. Then, the polymer gel was placed in the aqueous solution for 3 days. Afterward, the activity of the polymer gel was measured after it was extracted from the aqueous solution. The best adsorption characteristics and selectivity with respect to 137Cs was demonstrated by hydrogels AM:AA/3—2.4 × 10−8 mg/g, AM:AA/2—4.1 × 10−9 mg/g, and AM:AA/5—3.7 × 10−9 mg/g. Cryogel MAA:AM—7.0 × 10−8 mg/g, hydrogel AM:AA/2—5.1 × 10−8 mg/g, and hydrogel AM:AA/5—1.5 × 10−8 mg/g exhibit the highest selectivity for 90Sr. An adsorption potential has been demonstrated by the synthesized polymer gels with respect to such chemical elements as K, Fe, Ni, and U.

1. Introduction

Nuclear power plants, facilities for the production of nuclear fuel cycle materials, radioactively contaminated areas of nuclear test sites, as well as sites for the disposal of radioactive industrial waste pose a threat to the contamination of aquatic ecosystems. At the same time, the aquatic environment is one of the main migration pathways of radionuclides far beyond the industrial sites, test locations, and tailings dumps [1]. Together with the adsorption processes of radionuclide deposition in bottom sediments [2,3], they are transported and accumulated by the food chain [4], further involved in the biotic cycle as a result of the vital activities of living organisms [5]. Dilution of radioactive elements in the aquatic environment is important, which leads to the spread of contamination and a worse radioecological situation in vast spaces. The situation is aggravated by the vastness of the hydrological network of radionuclide migration, in which sources of domestic water supply may be a final critical link.
137Cs and 90Sr are the most hazardous radionuclides due to the emission of gamma radiation and high-energy beta particles, respectively, as well as the high probability of their formation during the nuclear fission process. They cause long-term damage to ecosystems due to their long half-life, approximately 30 years, and high mobility in the aquatic environment. However, the removal of these radionuclides from ecological systems is quite challenging, as the radionuclides are present in very low concentrations and coexist with a large excess of competing cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and others) [6,7].
Currently, common water purification methods include chemical precipitation, coagulation, membrane filtration, electrodialysis, ion exchange, and adsorption, with adsorption being the most widely used due to its high removal efficiency, simplicity, and environmental friendliness. In the adsorption process, the adsorbent is key to achieving effective removal of pollutants [8,9,10,11,12]. Therefore, the use of polymer gels as adsorbents for contaminant elements has been a focus of researchers for a long time [13,14]. The interest of scientists is driven by the potential applications of such gels in medicine, nanotechnology, catalysis, and ecology. Due to their porous structure, excellent water adsorption capacity, simplicity, and low synthesis cost, hydrogels are widely used for the removal of pollutants.
In publications, polymer hydrogels [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] and cryogels [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] are considered as adsorbents for dyes [31,32,33,34], metal ions [35,36,37,38], oil pollutants [39,40], and radionuclides [41,42,43]. There is a lack of information in the field of gel materials created for the adsorption of radionuclides in aqueous solutions. Various adsorbents have been studied for the removal of 137Cs and 90Sr from water; however, these adsorbents are either expensive or lack the necessary efficiency for large-scale water purification due to their low selectivity for Cs and Sr.
This study is the first to investigate the adsorption of 137Cs and 90Sr on radioactively contaminated water samples collected from the watercourses of the Degelen test site at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site.
The Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, which ranks second in the world and fourth in the number of nuclear weapons tests, was established in 1947 to test Soviet nuclear weapons. From 1949 to 1989, at least 456 nuclear tests were conducted at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test site detonating at least 616 nuclear and fusion devices, including 116 atmospheric and 340 underground nuclear blasts. The USSR’s first atomic (1949) and the world’s first hydrogen (1953) bombs were tested here.
Underground nuclear tests were conducted at the Degelen site in horizontal mine workings. From 1961 to 1989, 209 nuclear tests were conducted in 181 adits. A radioecological survey of the Degelen site showed that most of its territory is not contaminated with radionuclides. More than 90% of the radioactivity generated during nuclear tests is concentrated in adit cavities. However, elevated concentrations of radionuclides were detected in natural environments (soil, water, vegetation). They were formed in off-normal situations during nuclear tests; they were accumulated by the environment owing to the opening of adits after the tests and were carried away from the adit cavities by water. The most contaminated areas of the Degelen site are the near-mouth spots of adits with water streams. Long-term monitoring studies show that the carry-over of radionuclides by water from the cavities of nuclear blasts is still ongoing. Altogether, 8 to 12 adits like these have been identified at the Degelen site in different years depending on weather conditions. The peak concentrations of radioactivity in the creek water from different adits were 8.2 × 102 Bq/L for 137Cs, 2.1 × 103 Bq/L for 90Sr, 6.4 Bq/L for 239+240Pu, 2.6 Bq/L for 241Am, and 9.9 × 105 Bq/L for 3H [44].
The existing radioactively contaminated aquatic ecosystems in the territory of the former Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site [45,46,47,48] necessitate the study of technologies for their rehabilitation. This study will provide a scientific basis for the development of a closed-loop technology for the purification of radioactively contaminated natural and wastewater.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterisation of Gels

A series of differently crosslinked hydrogels and cryogels was obtained (Figure 1).

2.2. FTIR Spectroscopy Results

Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of AM:AA/5 hydrogel.
The peak at 3188 cm−1 corresponds to N-H stretching from the acrylamide portion of the polymer. The broadness of this peak suggests hydrogen bonding, which is common in amides. The 2938 cm−1 peak belongs to C-H stretching (sp3 hybridized C-H bonds). The 1665 cm−1 peak is characteristic of the C=O stretching (carbonyl group) present in both the acrylamide and acrylic acid units of the polymer. The 1555 cm−1 peak is likely due to N-H bending (amide II band) in the acrylamide portion. The 1400 cm−1 peak corresponds to C-H bending vibrations in the alkyl chains (–CH2–) of the polymer. The 1108 cm−1 peak is likely due to C-O stretching in the acrylic acid portion of the polymer.

2.3. Swelling Kinetics of Hydrogels

At this point in time, polymer hydrogels based on chemically crosslinked polymers are known to be capable of swelling several dozens or even hundreds of times in aqueous media. The swelling kinetics of gel materials characterizes how many times and over what time the resulted gel will increase in size when immersed in an aqueous solution. Hydrogels were subjected to swelling in an aqueous distilled solution.
A meshy crosslinked structure of a hydrogel provides the penetration of solution’s molecules into a polymer mesh through diffusion, which is accompanied by an increase in the mass and volume of a sample without changing the shape. The graph of mass variation of a polymer gel versus the swelling time is depicted in Figure 3.
On the first day, there is a sharp increase in the degree of swelling of hydrogels and cryogels in all media gradually reaching the equilibrium, which indicates a rapid adsorption of solvent molecules by the hydrogel. The swelling process occurs until the equilibrium of the hydrogel with the aqueous solution is reached, at which the swelling pressure, similar to osmotic, is equilibrated by an elastic strain of the crosslinks.
The swelling degree (SD) of synthesized polymer gels is shown in Figure 4.
The highest SD were derived for acrylamide and acrylic acid-based samples; for hydrogel AM:AA/3, this value was 61.1 g/g, for AM:AA/4—60.2 g/g, for AM:AA/6—50.4 g/g, and for AM:AA/5—40.5 g/g. Low values of swelling coefficients for AM (hydrogel) samples—8.1 g/g, AM/2—10.7 g/g, AM (cryogel)—12.6 g/g are associated with a suppressed ionization of carboxyl groups, which leads the samples to a collapsed state.
Since hydrogels can retain water thanks to their three-dimensional polymer mesh, their swelling and swelling rate depend on various parameters such as temperature, pH, ionic intensity, degree of crosslinking, and a type of monomer [49]. A variety of kinetic models of the swelling rate have been presented, but most of them describe either diffusion or polymer relaxation as the predominant process affecting the swelling rate [50]. To understand the mechanism of water adsorption by hydrogels, kinetic data were analyzed using a semi-empirical model proposed by Yavari and Azizyan [51]. This model allows for the description of the swelling process across the SD range and defines whether diffusion or relaxation dominates the process using Equation (1) as follows:
S D t   = S D e   1 e k 1 t k 2 t 1 / 2 ,
where SDt—SD of hydrogel (g/g) at a point in time t, SDe—equilibrium SD of the hydrogel (g/g), and k1 and k2—swelling rate constants.
Figure 5 shows the swelling kinetics of hydrogels synthesized in the distilled water, which was derived from Equation (2).
The value of the equilibrium degree of swelling is also influenced by the degree of crosslinking of hydrogels and cryogels. The degree of crosslinking is determined by the number of crosslinks in the hydrogel between linear polyacrylic chains and transverse MBAA links. Figure 6 shows that the swelling rate of AM:AA hydrogels was well above AM hydrogels. The findings show a rise in the degree of crosslinking (a decrease in the number of AK monomers between crosslinks) as the concentration of the aqueous AA solution increases, from which AM:AA hydrogels were synthesized. As the degree of crosslinking rises, the values of the equilibrium degrees of sample swelling are observed to decrease, which is associated with more crosslinking and interlacing of monomers that prevent swelling in the structure. A reduction in the degree of crosslinking, in addition to greater stretching of the mesh, often leads to a rupture of the chains, which causes the degree of swelling to rise more.
According to the Yavari–Azizyan model, if k1 ≫ k2, then the rate of gel swelling is determined by the relaxation of polymer chains. Conversely, if k1 ≪ k2, the swelling rate is defined by diffusion. If the values of k1 and k2 are close to each other, both diffusion and relaxation processes affect the swelling rate. Table 1 summarizes the swelling kinetics of the synthesized types of hydrogels.
The data show that for all synthesized hydrogels, the swelling process mechanism corresponds to both diffusion and relaxation processes; however, for AM:AA/1 hydrogel, the swelling rate is defined only by relaxation processes.

2.4. Mechanical Properties of Hydrogels and Cryogels

The mechanical characteristics of hydrogels and cryogels, as well as their relationship with the degree of crosslinking, were determined in the regime of uniaxial compression of samples swollen in equilibrium in the distilled water until completely destroyed. Figure 6 shows the compression graphs of synthesized polymer gels.
That said, for all synthesized gels, the elasticity curve looks the same; as the pressure on the sample grows, its elasticity persists to a certain critical point, beyond which the gel begins to break down.
Young’s modulus is a mechanical characteristic of materials that defines their ability to resist longitudinal deformations. It shows the rigidity degree of the material. The approximate value of the modulus can be determined from the strain diagram obtained during compression tests. In this case, Young’s modulus is equal to the ratio of normal strains to the relevant relative deformations in the graph section (Figure 6) up to the limit of proportionality σpc (the tangent of the angle α of the slope of the proportionality section to the deformation axis ε).
E = σ/ε = tgα
As a result of tests, Young’s elasticity moduli were computed for each synthesized polymer gel as depicted in Figure 7.
As the degree of crosslinking increases, the values of strength, rigidity, and elasticity of the hydrogel samples grow. Due to the greater number of crosslinks, the hydrogel is able to withstand heavy loads without collapsing compared to samples characterized by a lower degree of crosslinking. Similarly, as the degree of gel crosslinking rises, the elasticity modulus of the samples increases. An increase in the elasticity modulus and a decrease in the relative deformation at collapse, as the degree of crosslinking increases, indicate an increase in rigidity and, hence, a slight decrease in the sample elasticity. A rise in the fragility of samples in this case can be explained by a variety of structural flaws, the number of which rises as the degree of crosslinking increases.

2.5. TGA Analysis of Hydrogels and Cryogels

In order to assess the thermal tolerance, a thermogravimetric analysis of synthesized polymer gels was carried out, which consisted in recording the mass of the test subsample of the substance when its temperature changed. The results of the thermogravimetric analysis are shown in Figure 8.
As can be seen from the graph, the destruction of the resulting gels begins at 100 °C. With a rise in temperature, the gel mass is gradually lost, and at 600 °C polymer gels in each case lose 40 to 50% of their mass.

2.6. Study of Cryogel Morphology

Polymer cryogels have a highly porous skeleton structure (Figure 9), which should theoretically facilitate an intensive adsorption of radionuclides into these structures. The pore size in such structures can vary between dozens and hundreds of micrometers. The ImageJ Version 1.54 software was used to calculate the number and pore sizes of synthesized cryogels, which allows for an automated count of cavity sizes based on scanning electron microscopy images.
The figure shows the results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the computational process of the number and pore sizes of synthesized cryogels (Figure 10).
The figure presents the pore ratio of synthesized cryogels to their number, MAA:AM and AM, via the application ImageJ. The pore size of synthesized cryogel AM averaged from 58 to 350 µm and from 40 to 300 µm for MAA:AM cryogel. The graph shows that most of the pores are smaller than 100 µm. As the pore size increases, their number decreases (Figure 11).

2.7. Study of Radionuclide Adsorption

The chemical structure of hydrogels and cryogels enables them to interact with metal ions due to the presence of carboxyl groups from acrylic acid (AA) or methacrylic acid (MAA) in the hydrogel network. The carboxylate groups (–COO) in the hydrogel/cryogel network can participate in ion exchange, where metal ions in the solution replace the hydrogen ions (H+) or other cations associated with the carboxylate groups. This is a primary mechanism for metal ion adsorption. On the other hand, the carboxylate and amide groups can act as ligands, forming stable chelate complexes with metal ions. This is particularly effective for transition metal ions, which have vacant d-orbitals available for coordination.
Experiments on the adsorption of 137Cs and 90Sr from aqueous solutions were conducted under static conditions by placing a polymer gel subsample weighing from 0.07 g to 2.5 g in a 500 mL solution for 72 h. The activity concentration of 137Cs in the initial solution ranged from 115 to 250 Bq/L and from 250 to 585 Bq/L for 90Sr, respectively.
Table 2 shows the results of gamma-ray spectrometric analyses for the content of 137Cs in polymer gel samples following the extraction from a radioactively contaminated aqueous solution.
The tabulated results show that AM:AA/3—2.4 × 10−8 mg/g, AM:AA/2—4.1 × 10−9 mg/g, and AM:AA/5—3.7 × 10−9 mg/g hydrogels have the best adsorption characteristics and selectivity with respect to 137Cs. Even though the mass of the first gel increased during adsorption from 0.07 to 12.9 g, that of the second polymer from 2.5 to 66 g, and that of the third adsorbent from 1.2 to 25 g. Polymer cryogels along with other hydrogels proved to be less effective for adsorbing 137Cs. Table 3 lists the results of beta spectrometric analyses for the content of 90Sr in polymer gel samples after the extraction from a radioactively contaminated aqueous solution.
The tabulated results show that the cryogel MAA:AM—7.0 × 10−8 mg/g, hydrogel AM:AA/2, whose activity concentrations was 5.1 × 10−8 mg/g, and AM:AA/5—1.5 × 10−8 mg/g have the best adsorption characteristics and selectivity with respect to 90Sr. Even though the mass of the cryogel increased during adsorption from 0.7 to 10.5 that of the second polymer from 1.2 to 25 g, and that of the third adsorbent from 2.5 to 66.4 g.
The adsorption potential of synthesized polymer gels with respect to natural chemical elements K, Fe, Ni, and U unrelated to nuclear tests has also been studied. To do so, the content of the above components was measured in the initial aqueous solutions before adsorption and in the same ones after adsorption. The removal efficiency results are depicted in Figure 12.
The synthesized polymer hydrogels and cryogels demonstrated the best results with respect to the macronutrient K, while in all cases its concentration decreased from 2 to 5 thousand times. Fe content in the aqueous solution decreased hundreds of times after adsorption. The AM:AA/2 and AM hydrogels exhibited the greatest adsorption potential with respect to Fe, while its concentration in the solution decreased from 2 × 10−1 mg/L to <1.5 × 10−2 mg/L. Ni content in the aqueous solution decreased dozens of time after adsorption. The AM:AA/1 and AM:AA/6 hydrogels demonstrated the greatest adsorption potential with respect to Ni, while its concentration in the solution decreased from 7.7 × 10−2 mg/L to <1.5 × 10−2 mg/L. For hydrogels AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, AM:AA/5, and U content in water samples after adsorption was also reduced from 2 to 11 times. In general, in most cases, the content of all chemical elements tends to drop. However, in some cases, their content after adsorption not only remained the same, but also increased. This increase in the concentration is probably due to the fact that the hydrogel adsorbs water bypassing the element, while increasing the concentration of the element in the solution (Table 4).
The adsorption of metals from aqueous solutions by acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels can occur through several different mechanisms. Acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels, due to their structure, possess certain properties that influence the processes of metal ion adsorption. Acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels contain ions such as hydrogen ions (H+) or sodium ions (Na+), which can exchange with metal ions in the solution. This process most often occurs in the case of hydrogels and cryogels containing anionic or cationic functional groups, which can bind with metal ions in the solution.
Acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels have polar functional groups, such as amide (–CONH2) and carboxyl groups. These groups can interact with metal ions, forming electrostatic bonds. This is especially relevant for hydrogels with anionic functional groups, which can attract cationic metals.
Some functional groups, such as amide (–CONH2) or amine groups, can form coordination bonds with metal ions because they have lone pairs of electrons. Such bonds provide stronger adsorption of metal ions, especially for transition metals (e.g., Fe2+, Ni2+).
Acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels, like many other hydrogels, have a porous structure. These pores can serve for the physical trapping of metal ions. Ions can enter the pores of the hydrogel and be retained there due to their size or through interactions with functional groups in the pore walls.
In the case of cryogels, which have a more pronounced porous and network structure (such as polyacrylamide cryogels), the capture of metal ions occurs within the microstructure of the material itself. This can be attributed to both physical and chemical interactions, providing high adsorption capacity.
Thus, the adsorption of metal ions by acrylamide hydrogels and cryogels can occur through a combination of several mechanisms, such as ion exchange, electrostatic and coordination interactions, chemisorption, physical adsorption, and pore trapping.

3. Conclusions

Over the period of the research work, seven polymer hydrogels and two cryogels based on acrylamide, acrylic acids, and methacrylic acids were synthesized in different proportions and varying in degrees of crosslinking.
The kinetics of synthesized gel materials has been studied. The highest value of the equilibrium degree of swelling of the samples was observed for hydrogels AM:AA/3—61.1 g/g, AM:AA/4—60.2 g/g, AM:AA/6—50.4 g/g, and the lowest ones—for AM (hydrogel)—8.1 g/g, AM:AA/2—10.7 g/g, and AM (cryogel)—12.6 g/g. The data show that for all synthesized hydrogels, the mechanism of the swelling process corresponds to both diffusion and relaxation processes. However, for the AM:AA/1 hydrogel, the swelling rate is only defined by relaxation processes.
The mechanical strength of the synthesized gels was studied. The largest elastic moduli were for cryogels MAA:AM—331.5 Pa and AM—94.09 Pa. The pore size of synthesized cryogel AM averaged from 58 to 350 µm and for MAA:AM cryogel averaged from 40 to 300 µm.
The processes of selective adsorption of radioactive elements in aqueous solutions were investigated. Cryogel MAA:AM—7.0 × 10−8 mg/g, hydrogel AM:AA/2—5.1 × 10−8 mg/g, and hydrogel AM:AA/5—1.5 × 10−8 mg/g have the best adsorption characteristics and selectivity with respect to 90Sr. Selectivity with respect to 137Cs is well below for hydrogels AM:AA/3—2.4 × 10−8 mg/g, AM:AA/2—4.1 × 10−9 mg/g, and AM:AA/5—3.7 × 10−9 mg/g.
The synthesized polymer hydrogels and cryogels demonstrated the best results with respect to the macronutrient K, for which, in all cases, the concentration decreased from 2 to 5 thousand times. Fe content in the aqueous solution decreased hundreds of times after adsorption. The AM:AA/2 and AM hydrogels demonstrated the greatest adsorption potential with respect to Fe, for which the concentration in the solution was reduced from 2 × 10−1 mg/L to <1.5 × 10−2 mg/L. Ni content in the aqueous solution dropped dozens of times after adsorption. The AM:AA/1 and AM:AA/6 hydrogels demonstrated the greatest adsorption potential with respect to Ni, for which the concentration in the solution decreased from 7.7 × 10−2 mg/L to <1.5 × 10−2 mg/L. For hydrogels AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, AM:AA/5, and U content in water samples after adsorption also dropped from 2 to 11 times.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The following reagents were used for the synthesis of polymer hydrogels: acrylamide (AM, purity 99%), acrylic acid (AA, purity 99%), methacrylic acid (MAA, purity 99%), N, N’—methylene bisacrylamide (MBAA, purity 99%) was used as a crosslinking agent. Ammonium persulfate (PSA) 98% purity served as the initiating agent of polymerization. N,N,N′,N′—Tetramethylenediamine (TEMED) used as an initiating agent for cryogel synthesis. The listed reagents were products of Sigma Aldrich (USA) and were used without being extra purified.

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Preparation of Polymer Hydrogels and Cryogels

A mixture of AAm, AA (or MA), and MBAA, corresponding to the molar ratio of AAm:AA (or AAm:MAA) 50:50 (or 10:90) mol%/ mol%, was dissolved in 15 mL of deionized water. Then the required amount of the initiating agent, PSA, was added to the solution and mixed until completely dissolved. A solution containing dissolved monomers, a crosslinking, and initiating agent, was transferred to a test tube and purged with argon for 15 min to remove dissolved oxygen. Thereafter, the test tube was carefully carried to the thermostat. Free-radical copolymerization was accomplished at 60 °C for 20 min. To remove unreacted components and achieve a fully swollen state, all synthesized polymer gels were immersed in distilled water for a week with water daily changed. Next, the prepared hydrogels were sequentially flushed with 25% ethanol (for 2 h), 50% ethanol (for 2 h), 75% ethanol (for 2 h), and 96% ethanol (overnight) for dehydration. For the preparation of dry gels they were then air-dried for 24 h [52,53]. The chemical reaction for hydrogel synthesis is shown in Figure 13.
Polymer cryogels were synthesized using the same procedure as hydrogels, except for the addition of TEMED to the initial solution and creation of free-radical copolymerization conditions. In the case of cryogel synthesis, after adding TEMED, the solution was cooled down in the ice bath for 5 min. The solution in a glass cylinder was frozen, followed by cryopolymerization on a cryothermostat at a temperature of minus 12 °C. To remove unreacted reagents and dry the cryogels, the same procedures were carried out as in the case of hydrogels. The amount of monomers in the initial mixture (mg) used for the synthesis of hydrogels and cryogels is shown in Table 5.

4.2.2. Swelling Kinetics

The swelling degree of hydrogels was calculated as per the formula:
SD = m s     m d m d ,
where ms—mass of a swollen sample, g.; md—mass of a dried sample, g.

4.2.3. Mechanical Strength of Polymer Gels

The mechanical properties of the hydrogels were examined using a TA.XTplus Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK,), as described in a previous study. For this purpose, a hydrogel sample was placed on the platform of the apparatus and compressed using a cylindrical probe (P/75) at a speed of 0.5 mm/s. Young’s moduli of the hydrogels were determined from the slope of the initial linear region of the stress-strain curve for each hydrogel.

4.2.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Hydrogels

Thermogravimetric analysis of the freeze-dried hydrogels was performed using a LabSys Evo device (Setaram, Caluire-et-Cuire, France) in the temperature range of 25–600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1 under an inert atmosphere.

4.2.5. SEM of Cryogels

To analyze the morphology of the cryogels, SEM observations were conducted using a JEOL JSM-6390 LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Sample preparation was performed using a JEE-420 vacuum sputtering unit (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with carbon rods (JEOL DATUM, Tokyo, Japan) to form a thin conductive carbon layer on the surface of the cryogels.

4.2.6. Adsorption Experiments

The efficiency of adsorption of radioactive elements from aqueous solutions by polymer hydrogels and cryogels was evaluated by placing various pure samples of synthesized gels in radioactively contaminated aqueous solutions. The figure shows all the stages of the experiment (Figure 14).
The main point of the experiment was to measure the activity of an aqueous solution before placing a polymer gel there, holding the polymer gel in the aqueous solution for three days, followed by measuring the activity of the polymer gel after removing it from the aqueous solution and evaporation of moisture from the sample.
The main interest in this case was the efficiency of adsorption by polymer gels with respect to such radionuclides as 90Sr and 137Cs, since, theoretically, hydrogels can effectively adsorb 90Sr and 137Cs for several reasons. The main factors include their high porosity, large surface for interaction with 90Sr and 137Cs ions, as well as the ability to chemically bind to ions. Hydrogels have a significant inner surface thanks to their porous structure. This allows them to adsorb and retain 90Sr and 137Cs ions in their pores. Many hydrogels contain functional groups such as carboxylic, amino groups, or other ions that can react with 90Sr and 137Cs ions substituting them in the material structure. This occurs due to the ion exchange process, in which 90Sr and 137Cs ions substitute other ions, such as sodium or calcium in the hydrogel. Hydrogels, especially those based on natural polymers, may contain functional groups that are highly affined to metals, including 90Sr and 137Cs. For example, groups such as carboxyls or amino groups can effectively bind to 90Sr and 137Cs ions. Some hydrogels are biodegradable, which makes them suitable for water treatment or the removal of radionuclides such as 90Sr and 137Cs from the environment. In summary, the combination of chemical properties, porosity, and ion exchange capacity makes hydrogels good candidates for the adsorption of 90Sr and 137Cs. In addition, these radionuclides are incorporated in the main contaminants of adit water streams at the Degelen site. In addition, the efficiency of adsorption of such natural chemical elements as K, Fe, Ni, and U, which have nothing to do with nuclear tests, has also been studied.
Water was sampled at the Degelen site in the vicinity of adits No. 504, 165, and 104. Three water samples were collected from each adit totaling 9 L on a 1 L of water per 1 polymer gel basis. Water sampling points are depicted in Figure 15.
The activity of 137Cs in the samples of aqueous solutions and polymer gels was measured using an ORTEC GEM-FX 7025-S gamma spectrometer and a Progress-beta beta spectrometer was used to measure the activity of 90Sr in the samples. The elemental analysis of water samples was carried out using an ELAN 9000 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer and an iCAP 6300 Duo inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft and visualization, Y.A. and A.K., conceptualization, methodology and resources A.K. and V.A., formal analysis F.Z., supervision and validation A.K. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number BR24993140 and by the Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number BR24792713.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMAcrylomide
AAAcrylic acid
MAAMethacrylic acid
MBAAMethylenebisacrylamide
PSAAmmonium persulfate
TEMEDTetramethylethylenediamine
SDSwelling degree

References

  1. Aidarkhanova, A.; Larionova, N.; Tashekova, A.; Dyussembayeva, M.; Mamyrbayeva, A.; Timonova, L.; Shakenov, Y.; Mulikova, A.; Aidarkhanov, A. Assessment of the radionuclide and chemical composition of the Irtysh River water at the Republic of Kazakhstan territory. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 26208–26218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mukhamediyarov, N.; Makarychev, S.; Umarov, M.; Dyuisembaeva, M.; Shakenov, Y.; Kolbin, V.; Yesilkanov, G.; Temirzhanova, A.; Tashekova, A.; Zhamaldinov, F.; et al. Uranium speciation and spatial distribution in the bottom sediments along the Uzynbulak creek at the Semipalatinsk test site. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2023, 333, 2547–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mukhamediyarov, N.; Makarychev, S.; Kolbin, V.; Dyuisembaeva, M.; Shakenov, Y.; Yesilkanov, G.; Temirzhanova, A.; Tashekova, A.; Umarov, M. Study of spatial distribution of elements in the system “water—Bottom sediments” of Uzynbulak creek of Semipalatinsk test site. Izv. Saratov Univ. Earth Sci. 2022, 22, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aidarkhanova, A.; Lukashenko, S.; Larionova, N.; Polevik, V. Radionuclide transport in the “sediments—Water—Plants” system of the water bodies at the Semipalatinsk test site. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 184–185, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Panitskiy, A.; Bazarbaeva, A.; Baigazy, S.; Polivkina, Y.; Alexandrovich, I.; Abisheva, M. Bioaccumulation of radionuclides in hoofed animals inhabiting the Semipalatinsk Test Site. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0294632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, Y.K.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Bae, K.; Harbottle, D.; Lee, J.W. Facile one-pot synthesis of dual-cation incorporated titanosilicate and its deposition to membrane surfaces for simultaneous removal of Cs+ and Sr2+. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 493, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, J.H.; Yim, M.S.; Harbottle, D.; Lee, J.W. Synthesis of functionalized porous montmorillonite via solid-state NaOH treatment for efficient removal of cesium and strontium ions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 450, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abidli, A.; Rejeb, Z.; Zaoui, A.; Naguib, N.; Park, C. Comprehensive insights into the application of graphene-based aerogels for metals removal from aqueous media: Surface chemistry, mechanisms, and key features. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 335, 103338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Badran, A.M.; Utra, U.; Yussof, N.S.; Bashir, M.J.K. Advancements in Adsorption Techniques for Sustainable Water Purification: A Focus on Lead Removal. Separations 2023, 10, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, K.J.; Yang, L.N.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, N. Nanocellulose-based aerogels for the adsorption and removal of heavy-metal ions from wastewater: A review. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 43, 111744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, A.D.; Kirti, N.; Katiyar, P.; Singh, H. A critical review on three-dimensional cellulose-based aerogels: Synthesis, physico-chemical characterizations and applications as adsorbents for heavy metals removal from water. Cellulose 2023, 30, 3397–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paul, J.; Ahankari, S.S. Nanocellulose-based aerogels for water purification: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 309, 120677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, A. Preparation of Chitosan/Calcium Alginate/Bentonite Composite Hydrogel and Its Heavy Metal Ions Adsorption Properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Yin, H.; Wang, J. α-ketoglutaric acid modified chitosan/polyacrylamide semi-interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel for removal of heavy metal ions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 628, 127262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hugar, A.; Hanagadakar, M.; Hiremath, J.; Merava, K.; Rayawgol, S. Sorption of divalent metal ions by modified carbopol-based adsorbent nanocomposite hydrogel. Desalination Water Treat. 2024, 320, 100590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Zhao, K.; Liu, L.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Liu, M. Modified kaolin hydrogel for Cu2+ adsorption. e-Polymers 2022, 22, 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shan, S.; Sun, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, W.; Ji, T. High-Performance Hydrogel Adsorbent Based on Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Lignin for Copper(II) Ion Removal. Polymers 2021, 13, 3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Xie, W.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, X.; Yang, L. Realizing efficient solar evaporation and rapid lithium sorption by the halloysite nanotubes-based hydrogel. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 437, 140523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Guo, H.; Cao, X.; Lou, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.A. Novel lignin hydrogel supported Zn(VI) for efficient removal of Cr(VI). Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tan, Z.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, D.; Dong, H.; He, Y. Facile separation of Th(IV) from aqueous solution by graphene hydrogel. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 326, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, Q.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, P.; Liu, M.; Xu, D.; Guo, X.; Wu, Y. A 3D porous fluorescent hydrogel based on amino-modified carbon dots with excellent sorption and sensing abilities for environmentally hazardous Cr(VI). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Malakhova, I.; Privar, Y.; Parotkina, Y.; Mironenko, A.; Eliseikina, M.; Balatskiy, D.; Golikov, A.; Bratskaya, S. Rational Design of Polyamine-Based Cryogels for Metal Ion Sorption. Molecules 2020, 25, 4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lazar, M.; Dinu, I.; Dinu, M. Synthesis of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid-Functionalized Chitosan Cryogels as Potential Sorbents of Heavy Metal Ions. Mater. Plast. 2021, 58, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, J.; Liao, C.; Guo, X.; Hou, S.; He, W. PAAO cryogels from amidoximated P(acrylic acid-co-acrylonitrile) for the adsorption of lead ion. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 171, 111192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, J.; Yang, H.; da Silva, J.; Rojas, O. Loading of Iron (II, III) Oxide Nanoparticles in Cryogels Based on Microfibrillar Cellulose for Heavy Metal Ion Separation. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2020, 2020, 9261378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Humelnicu, D.; Dragan, E.; Ignat, M.; Dinu, M.A. Comparative Study on Cu2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Fe3+, and Cr3+ Metal Ions Removal from Industrial Wastewaters by Chitosan-Based Composite Cryogels. Molecules 2020, 25, 2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bagdat, S.; Tokay, F.; Demirci, S.; Yilmaz, S.; Sahiner, N. Removal of Cd(II), Co(II), Cr(III), Ni(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) ions from wastewater using polyethyleneimine (PEI) cryogels. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 329, 117002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mecca, T.; Ussia, M.; Caretti, D.; Cunsolo, F.; Dattilo, S.; Scurti, S.; Privitera, V.; Carroccio, S. N-methyl-D-glucamine based cryogels as reusable sponges to enhance heavy metals removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Privar, Y.; Malakhova, I.; Pestov, A.; Fedorets, A.; Azarova, Y.; Schwarz, S.; Bratskaya, S. Polyethyleneimine cryogels for metal ions sorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1392–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baimenov, A.; Berillo, D.; Azat, S.; Nurgozhin, T.; Inglezakis, V. Removal of Cd2+ from Water by Use of Super-Macroporous Cryogels and Comparison to Commercial Adsorbents. Polymers 2020, 12, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jin, H.; Xu, X.; Yu, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, S.; Qu, X. Bimetallic Organic Gel for Effective Methyl Orange Dye Adsorption. Gels 2024, 10, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, R.; Hou, Y.; Lu, R.; Li, S.; Ren, S.; Gao, Z. A multifunctional polyacrylamide/chitosan hydrogel for dyes adsorption and metal ions detection in water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sabzevari, A.; Kakanejadifard, A. Synthesis and characterization of grapheme-chitosan hydrogel as adsorbent for methyl orange. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 8607–8625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jabeen, S.; Alam, S.; Shah, L.A.; Zahoor, M.; Umar, M.N.; Ullah, R. Novel hydrogel poly (GG-co-acrylic acid) for the sorptive removal of the color Rhodamine-B from contaminated water. Heliyon 2023, 9, 19780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaurasiya, A.; Pande, P.P.; Shankar, R.; Dey, K.K.; Singh, D.; Kashaudhan, K.; Kumar, P. Allyl sorbitol crosslinker-based novel hydrogel for the removal of toxic metal ions from water. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2025, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alraddadi, H.M.; Fagieh, T.M.; Bakhsh, E.M.; Akhtar, K.; Khan, S.B.; Khan, S.A.; Bahaidarah, E.A.; Homdi, T.A. Adsorptive removal of heavy metals and organic dyes by sodium alginate/ coffee waste composite hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 247, 125708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kamal, K.H.; Hassan, M.A.; Kamel, S.; El-Sayed, N.S. Efficient removal of Cd2+ ions and methylene blue from aqueous solutions by polyanionic sodium alginate-derived hydrogel. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 51, 104596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taye, A.; Yifru, A.; Getachew, N.; Mehretie, S.; Admassie, S. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium using Water Hyacinth Leaf Protein Concentrate/Graphene Oxide hydrogel. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, B.; Feng, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Yan, D. Nanostructure-Based Oil–Water Separation: Mechanism and Status. Separations 2023, 10, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.; Xue, J.Y.; Ju, Y.Y.; Gao, Y.J.; Cheng, X.W.; Guan, J.P. Multifunctional nanofiber aerogels for environmental applications: Oil-water separation, thermal insulation, fire-proofing. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cao, M.; Peng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Luo, G.S.; Feng, L.J.; Zhao, S.L.; Yuan, Y.H.; Wang, N. High-efficiency uranium extraction from seawater by low-cost natural protein hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, F.X.; Bai, J.W.; Yan, H.J.; Zheng, S.Y.; Su, S.Z.; Li, J.Q.; Zhang, C.H.; Wang, J. Gelatin-polyacrylamide double network enhanced polyamidoxime magnetic photothermal composite hydrogel for highly efficient and selective uranium extraction from seawater. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 485, 149822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gong, T.; Liang, H.Y.; Li, X.; Li, G.Q.; Chen, F.Y.; Wang, H.Q. High-adsorption-capacity and recyclable double-network hydrogel nanofibers for dynamic uranium sorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 342, 126963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Panitskiy, A.; Bazarbaeva, A.; Baigazy, S.; Alexandrovich, I.; Larionova, N. Radioecological characteristics of Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus Pal., 1771) inhabiting locations of nuclear weapon tests. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0308518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aidarkhanova, A.; Larionova, N.; Tleukanova, Z.; Mamyrbaeva, A.; Ermakova, R.; Svetacheva, Y.; Aktayev, M.; Panitskiy, A. The character of radionuclide contamination of natural lakes at the territory of the Semipalatinsk test site. J. Environ. Radioact. 2022, 255, 107041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aidarkhanova, A.; Timonova, L.; Aidarkhanov, A.; Monayenko, V.; Iskenov, A.; Subbotin, S.; Pronin, S.; Belykh, N. The character of Lake Kishkensor contamination in the area of underground nuclear explosions at the Semipalatinsk Test Site territory. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aktayev, M.; Subbotin, S.; Aidarkhanov, A.; Aidarkhanova, A.; Timonova, L.; Larionova, N. Characterization of geological and lithological features in the area proximal to tritium-contaminated groundwater at the Semipalatinsk test site. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, 0300971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gorlachev, I.; Kharkin, P.; Dyussembayeva, M.; Lukashenko, S.; Gluchshenko, G.; Matiyenko, L.; Zheltov, D.; Kitamura, A.; Khlebnikov, N. Comparative analysis of water contamination of the Shagan river at the Semipalatinsk test site with heavy metals and artificial radionuclides. J. Environ. Radioact. 2020, 213, 106110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yelemessova, G.; Gussenov, I.; Ayazbayeva, A.; Shakhvorostov, A.; Orazzhanova, L.; Klivenko, A.; Kudaibergenov, S. Preparation and Characterization of Preformed Polyelectrolyte and Polyampholyte Gel Particles for Plugging of High-Permeability Porous Media. Gels 2024, 10, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kutergin, A.; Nedobukh, T.; Nikiforov, A.; Zenkova, K.; Tarasovskikh, T. Sorption extraction of strontium radionuclides from surface waters with natural aluminosilicate. Water Manag. Russ. Probl. Technol. Manag. 2021, 4, 118–134. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Voronina, A.; Noskova, A.; Semenishchev, V.; Blinova, M.; Nikiforov, A. Purification of seawater from cesium and strontium radionuclides. Water Manag. Russ. 2019, 6, 102–120. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  52. Gussenov, I.; Shakhvorostov, A.; Ayazbayeva, A.; Gizatullina, N.; Klivenko, A.; Kudaibergenov, S. Preparation and Characterization of a Preformed Polyampholyte Particle Gel Composite for Conformance Control in Oil Recovery. Polymers 2023, 15, 4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kudaibergenov, S.; Tatykhanova, G.; Klivenko, A. Complexation of macroporous amphoteric cryogels based on N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid with dyes, surfactant, and protein. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Synthesized hydrogels in their swollen form; (b) synthesized polymer gels in their dry form.
Figure 1. (a) Synthesized hydrogels in their swollen form; (b) synthesized polymer gels in their dry form.
Gels 11 00311 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of hydrogel AM:AA/5.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of hydrogel AM:AA/5.
Gels 11 00311 g002
Figure 3. Swelling kinetics of synthesized polymer gels.
Figure 3. Swelling kinetics of synthesized polymer gels.
Gels 11 00311 g003
Figure 4. Swelling degree of synthesized polymer gels.
Figure 4. Swelling degree of synthesized polymer gels.
Gels 11 00311 g004
Figure 5. Graphical description of the swelling kinetics of AM:AA/1 hydrogel (a); AM:AA/6 hydrogel (b) as per the Yavari–Azizyan model.
Figure 5. Graphical description of the swelling kinetics of AM:AA/1 hydrogel (a); AM:AA/6 hydrogel (b) as per the Yavari–Azizyan model.
Gels 11 00311 g005
Figure 6. (a) Compression graph of synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, and AM:AA/5 hydrogels; (b) compression graph of synthesized AM:AA/5, AM, AM (cryo), and MAA:AM (cryo) gels.
Figure 6. (a) Compression graph of synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, and AM:AA/5 hydrogels; (b) compression graph of synthesized AM:AA/5, AM, AM (cryo), and MAA:AM (cryo) gels.
Gels 11 00311 g006
Figure 7. (a) Young’s elasticity moduli for each synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, and AM:AA/4 hydrogel; (b) Young’s elasticity moduli for each synthesized AM:AA/5, AM:AA/6, AM, and AM (cryo) gels.
Figure 7. (a) Young’s elasticity moduli for each synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, and AM:AA/4 hydrogel; (b) Young’s elasticity moduli for each synthesized AM:AA/5, AM:AA/6, AM, and AM (cryo) gels.
Gels 11 00311 g007
Figure 8. (a) Results of the thermogravimetric analysis of each synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, and AM:AA/5 hydrogel; (b) results of the thermogravimetric analysis of each synthesized AM:AA/6, AM, AM (cryo), and MAA:AM (cryo) gels.
Figure 8. (a) Results of the thermogravimetric analysis of each synthesized AM:AA/1, AM:AA/2, AM:AA/3, AM:AA/4, and AM:AA/5 hydrogel; (b) results of the thermogravimetric analysis of each synthesized AM:AA/6, AM, AM (cryo), and MAA:AM (cryo) gels.
Gels 11 00311 g008
Figure 9. Structure of the synthesized cryogel: an image from the scanning electron microscopy of the cryogel.
Figure 9. Structure of the synthesized cryogel: an image from the scanning electron microscopy of the cryogel.
Gels 11 00311 g009
Figure 10. (a) Structure of the synthesized cryogel: an image from the scanning electron microscopy of cryogel MAA:AM; (b) the counting process of the number and pore size via the application ImageJ.
Figure 10. (a) Structure of the synthesized cryogel: an image from the scanning electron microscopy of cryogel MAA:AM; (b) the counting process of the number and pore size via the application ImageJ.
Gels 11 00311 g010
Figure 11. (a) Pore size ratio of synthesized AM cryogel to their number; (b) pore size ratio of synthesized MAA:AM cryogel to their number.
Figure 11. (a) Pore size ratio of synthesized AM cryogel to their number; (b) pore size ratio of synthesized MAA:AM cryogel to their number.
Gels 11 00311 g011
Figure 12. Removal efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to: (a) K; (b) Fe; (c) Ni; and (d) U.
Figure 12. Removal efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to: (a) K; (b) Fe; (c) Ni; and (d) U.
Gels 11 00311 g012
Figure 13. The chemical reaction for hydrogel synthesis.
Figure 13. The chemical reaction for hydrogel synthesis.
Gels 11 00311 g013
Figure 14. Assessment stages of the selective adsorption efficiency for radioactive elements in aqueous solutions by means of polymer gels.
Figure 14. Assessment stages of the selective adsorption efficiency for radioactive elements in aqueous solutions by means of polymer gels.
Gels 11 00311 g014
Figure 15. Water sampling points within test adits of the Degelen site.
Figure 15. Water sampling points within test adits of the Degelen site.
Gels 11 00311 g015
Table 1. Swelling kinetics of hydrogels as per the Yavari–Azizyan model.
Table 1. Swelling kinetics of hydrogels as per the Yavari–Azizyan model.
SampleSek1k2R2Primary Process
AM:AA/115.289.190.0120.99Relaxation
AM:AA/210.620.0020.0030.99Relaxation and diffusion
AM:AA/35.70.004−0.0040.99Relaxation and diffusion
AM:AA/46.550.011−0.0240.98Relaxation and diffusion
AM:AA /53.780.009−0.0030.99Relaxation and diffusion
AM:AA /65.410.009−0.0180.98Relaxation and diffusion
AM8.190.0010.0210.99Relaxation and diffusion
Table 2. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to 137Cs.
Table 2. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to 137Cs.
Sample ConcentrationAA:AM/1AA:AM/2AA:AM/3AA:AM/4AA:AM/5AA:AM/6AMAM CryoMAA:AM Cryo
Aqueous solution activity, Bq/L260165250260115120165170170
Polymer gel activity after adsorption, Bq/g7.613.377.38.5123.82.62.96.4
Concentration of 137Cs in aqueous solution, mg/L8.1 × 10−85.1 × 10−87.8 × 10−88.1 × 10−83.6 × 10−83.7 × 10−85.1 × 10−85.2 × 10−85.3 × 10−8
Concentration of 137Cs in polymer gel after adsorption, mg/g2.3 × 10−94.1 × 10−92.4 × 10−82.6 × 10−93.7 × 10−91.1 × 10−98.1 × 10−109.0 × 10−101.9 × 10−9
Table 3. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to 90Sr.
Table 3. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to 90Sr.
Sample ConcentrationAA:AM/1AA:AM/2AA:AM/3AA:AM/4AA:AM/5AA:AM/6AMAM CryoMAA:AM Cryo
Aqueous solution activity, Bq/L470545448470250277545585585
Polymer gel activity after adsorption, Bq/g24260635080601035360
Concentration of 90Sr in aqueous solution, mg/L9.2 × 10−81.0 × 10−78.8 × 10−89.2 × 10−84.9 × 10−85.4 × 10−81.0 × 10−71.1 × 10−71.1 × 10−7
Concentration of 90Sr in polymer gel after adsorption, mg/g4.7 × 10−95.1 × 10−81.2 × 10−89.8 × 10−91.5 × 10−81.1 × 10−81.9 × 10−96.9 × 10−97.0 × 10−8
Table 4. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to K, Fe, Ni, and U.
Table 4. Adsorption efficiency of synthesized polymer gels relative to K, Fe, Ni, and U.
GelsElement Concentration in the Adsorbent, mg/g
KFeNiU
AM:AA/12.5 × 10−30.04 × 10−30.04 × 10−30.2 × 10−3
AM:AA/21.1 × 10−30.08 × 10−30.01 × 10−30.2 × 10−3
AM:AA/371.4 × 10−31.3 × 10−30.7 × 10−36.2 × 10−3
AM:AA/40.6 × 10−30.02 × 10−30.02 × 10−30.1 × 10−3
AM:AA/50.8 × 10−30.03 × 10−30.01 × 10−30.2 × 10−3
AM:AA/60.001 × 10−30.05 × 10−30.03 × 10−30.001 × 10−3
AM0.6 × 10−30.04 × 10−30.01 × 10−30.001 × 10−3
AM cryo1.2 × 10−30.08 × 10−30.01 × 10−30.02 × 10−3
MAA-AM cryo2 × 10−30.1 × 10−30.02 × 10−30.001 × 10−3
Table 5. Amount of monomers in the initial mixture that were used to synthesize hydrogels and cryogels.
Table 5. Amount of monomers in the initial mixture that were used to synthesize hydrogels and cryogels.
Polymer GelMonomer, g
AMAAMAAMBAA
AM:AA/10.61.2-0.075
AM:AA/21.12-0.1
AM:AA/30.60.6-0.075
AM:AA/411-0.1
AM:AA/511-0.2
AM:AA/61.80.2-0.1
AM2--0.1
AM cryo1.2--0.075
MAA-AM cryo1.8-0.20.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Artamonov, Y.; Krivitskiy, P.; Zhamaldinov, F.; Aseyev, V.; Klivenko, A. The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adsorbents Based on Acrylamide Hydrogels and Cryogels for Water Purification from Radioactive Contaminants. Gels 2025, 11, 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050311

AMA Style

Artamonov Y, Krivitskiy P, Zhamaldinov F, Aseyev V, Klivenko A. The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adsorbents Based on Acrylamide Hydrogels and Cryogels for Water Purification from Radioactive Contaminants. Gels. 2025; 11(5):311. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Artamonov, Yuriy, Pavel Krivitskiy, Fail Zhamaldinov, Vladimir Aseyev, and Alexey Klivenko. 2025. "The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adsorbents Based on Acrylamide Hydrogels and Cryogels for Water Purification from Radioactive Contaminants" Gels 11, no. 5: 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050311

APA Style

Artamonov, Y., Krivitskiy, P., Zhamaldinov, F., Aseyev, V., & Klivenko, A. (2025). The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adsorbents Based on Acrylamide Hydrogels and Cryogels for Water Purification from Radioactive Contaminants. Gels, 11(5), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050311

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop