Next Article in Journal
CFD Analysis of Turbulent Fibre Suspension Flow
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermophysical Properties of IoNanofluids Composed of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Thiocyanate and Carboxyl-functionalized Long Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of the Vadasz Number on the Onset of Thermal Convection in Rotating Bidispersive Porous Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Studies on Thermophysical and Electrical Properties of Graphene–Transformer Oil Nanofluid
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Heat-Dissipation Performance of Nanocomposite Phase-Change Materials in a Twin-Heat-Source System

by Yanxin Li 1, Jin Wang 1, Li Yang 1 and Bengt Sundén 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 28 August 2020 / Revised: 30 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 October 2020 / Published: 7 October 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper investigates a two-heat source system with the CuO/paraffin nanocomposite phase change materials. Heat transfer characteristics of the heat pipe-PCMs module is performed. The effects of fan power and heating power on the cooling module performance is studied. The results of this work is reasonable and vivid, so generally speaking, this work has the instructional value of the energy storage application, and it is recommended to be published after minor revision.

  1. The title of this paper is the “…..in a Multi-Heat Source System”. However, in the text, two heat sources is used, so it is not exact to say “a Multi-Heat Source System” in the title. It is recommended to be revised as “a Two-Heat Source System”.
  2. The “Introduction” should present the state-of-art of phase change materials as well as the research drawback. Besides, the problem this paper is aimed at to solve should be stated clearly, and the innovation should be highlighted.
  3. The mathematic principles this work follows has not be given, so it is recommended to add the fundamental principles of this study.
  1. To present more comprehensive background on this field, the following literature is recommended for authors to be compared and referenced in the literature review:

[1] Thermal management of electronic devices using pin-fin based cascade microencapsulated PCM/expand graphite composite, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 149:119199

[2] Performance study of phase change materials coupled with three-dimensional oscillating heat pipes with different structures for electronic cooling, Renewable Energy, 2020, 154:636-649.

[3] Preparation and characteristics evaluation of mono and hybrid nano-enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) for thermal management of microelectronics, Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 205, 112444.

[4] PCM charging process accelerated with combination of optimized triangle fins and nanoparticles, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 140:466-479.

[5] Microencapsulated phase change material (MEPCM) saturated in metal foam as an efficient hybrid PCM for passive thermal management: A numerical and experimental study, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 146:413-421.

[6] Experimental investigation of multiwall carbon nanotube/paraffin based heat sink for electronic device thermal management, Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 179:314-325.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors studied the heat transfer characteristics of the CuO/paraffin nanocomposite phase change materials. The work, of course, has a practical and scientific interest. However, the following issues should be addressed before the publication:

 

  1. Figure 1(b) would be good to replace with the scheme for composite preparation, for example.
  2. In the Experimental preparation section, I strongly encourage the authors to avoid using a table and preciously describe the procedure of the preparation and characterization of the composite material, because it is not clear now. The preparation section should be revised with more details (e.g. temperature control was provided or not, the condition of drying the material, etc.)
  3. “Experimental Uncertainty Analysis” what is the reason to put this section in the scientific article, what special interest in formula 1 to put this formula in the main text of the manuscript?
  4. Authors used “physical images” or “physical photos”. The term “physical” has some special sense here?
  5. In the capture to Figure 2. What does “(mm)” mean. The units should be provided to the image in the required place.
  6. Line 16. The authors should clarify the meaning of “10 W-10 W” in the abstract before using it.
  7. Line 25. If the authors mean the undercooling, they should use “supercooling” in place of “super cooling”.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop