Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study for Unsteady Waves Generated by Flow over a Permeable Wavy Bed
Next Article in Special Issue
Viscoelastic Representation of the Operation of Sucker Rod Pumps
Previous Article in Journal
Header Shape Effect on the Inlet Velocity Distribution in Cross-Flow Double-Layered Microchannel Heat Sinks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Computational Modelling to Study Extensional Rheometry Tests for Inelastic Fluids
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Strong Viscosity Increase in Aqueous Solutions of Cationic C22-Tailed Surfactant Wormlike Micelles

by Vyacheslav S. Molchanov 1,*, Andrei V. Rostovtsev 1, Kamilla B. Shishkhanova 1, Alexander I. Kuklin 2,3 and Olga E. Philippova 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 22 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 27 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Complex Fluids)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this work, the authors investigated the viscoelastic properties and networks structure at intermediate salt content. The topic is interesting and consistent with the content of “fluids”. However, the authors need to answer the following questions before it can be published on the journal “fluids”.

  • What is the innovation point of this work? Please explain it in the introduction part. I do believe similar works have already been done by several groups since 1980s.
  • Figure 2. Please explain how you calculate relaxation time.
  • What is the reason that the data in (a) is uneven?
  • Figure 5 (a) and line 232-233: How was the relaxation time calculated? Please explain it.
  • Line 258-272: Interesting explanation, but I believe that the reason of unbreakable chains at low surfactant concentrations is because the domination of reptation mechanism (still have break mechanism, but just not domination reason), while Single break chains at relatively high concentrations is because of the domination of breaking mechanism.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Congratulation to your carefull investigations and analyses. Some minor Korrektions are necessary:

line 53:  40 °C instead of 400 C

line 56:  60 °C instead of 600 C

Fig 5a: labeling of y-axis is missing

Fig 7a: labeling of y-axis is missing

Please add a list of symbols, including dimensions

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop