Next Article in Journal
Aerodynamic Effects of Knitted Wire Meshes—CFD Simulations of the Flow Field and Influence on the Flow Separation of a Backward-Facing Ramp
Next Article in Special Issue
Mass Transport in Membrane Systems: Flow Regime Identification by Fourier Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Neural Networks for Improving Wind Power Efficiency: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measurement of Mass Transfer Intensity in Gas–Liquid Medium of Bioreactor Circuit Using the Thermometry Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

From Two-Equation Turbulence Models to Minimal Error Resolving Simulation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Fluids 2022, 7(12), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7120368
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Fluid Mechanics: Feature Papers, 2022)

Abstract

Hybrid RANS-LES methods are supposed to provide major contributions to future turbulent flow simulations, in particular for reliable flow predictions under conditions where validation data are unavailable. However, existing hybrid RANS-LES methods suffer from essential problems. A solution to these problems is presented as a generalization of previously introduced continuous eddy simulation (CES) methods. These methods, obtained by relatively minor extensions of standard two-equation turbulence models, represent minimal error simulation methods. An essential observation presented here is that minimal error methods for incompressible flows can be extended to stratified and compressible flows, which opens the way to addressing relevant atmospheric science problems (mesoscale to microscale coupling) and aerospace problems (supersonic or hypersonic flow predictions). It is also reported that minimal error methods can provide valuable contributions to the design of consistent turbulence models under conditions of significant modeling uncertainties.
Keywords: computational fluid dynamics (CFD); large eddy simulation (LES); Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations; hybrid RANS-LES methods computational fluid dynamics (CFD); large eddy simulation (LES); Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations; hybrid RANS-LES methods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heinz, S. From Two-Equation Turbulence Models to Minimal Error Resolving Simulation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows. Fluids 2022, 7, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7120368

AMA Style

Heinz S. From Two-Equation Turbulence Models to Minimal Error Resolving Simulation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows. Fluids. 2022; 7(12):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7120368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heinz, Stefan. 2022. "From Two-Equation Turbulence Models to Minimal Error Resolving Simulation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows" Fluids 7, no. 12: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7120368

APA Style

Heinz, S. (2022). From Two-Equation Turbulence Models to Minimal Error Resolving Simulation Methods for Complex Turbulent Flows. Fluids, 7(12), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7120368

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop