Next Article in Journal
State of the Art Technologies for High Yield Heterologous Expression and Production of Oxidoreductase Enzymes: Glucose Oxidase, Cellobiose Dehydrogenase, Horseradish Peroxidase, and Laccases in Yeasts P. pastoris and S. cerevisiae
Next Article in Special Issue
Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Digestibility of Sweet Corn Processing Byproducts Silage Mixed with Millet Hull or Wheat Bran and Inoculated with a Lactic Acid Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Pigment Production Using Submerged Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lactic Acid Bacteria and Formic Acid Improve Fermentation Quality and Beneficial Predicted Functional Characteristics in Mixed Silage Consisting of Alfalfa and Perennial Ryegrass
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis

1
Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
2
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(2), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020092
Submission received: 17 December 2023 / Revised: 19 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 4 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing)

Abstract

:
Nitrites are universally acknowledged natural toxic substances that frequently lead to poisoning in humans and animals. During fermentation, certain microorganisms utilize a portion of the nitrogen element and reduce nitrates to nitrites through specific metabolic pathways. In this study, a highly effective lactic acid bacterial strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A50, was isolated and screened from alfalfa silage for its remarkable ability to degrade nitrites. L. plantarum A50 exhibits exceptional nitrite removal capacity, with a degradation rate of 99.06% within 24 h. Furthermore, L. plantarum A50 demonstrates normal growth under pH values ranging from 4 to 9 and salt concentrations of 5%, displaying excellent tolerance to acidity, alkalinity, and salinity. Additionally, it undergoes fermentation using various carbon sources. Within the first 6–12 h of culture, L. plantarum A50 primarily achieves nitrite degradation through non-acidic processes, resulting in a degradation rate of 82.67% by the 12th hour. Moreover, the metabolites produced by L. plantarum A50 exhibit a synergistic interaction with acidity, leading to a nitrite degradation rate of 98.48% within 24 h. Notably, both L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth were found to degrade nitrites. Consequently, a non-targeted metabolomic analysis using LC-MS was conducted to identify 342 significantly different metabolites between L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth. Among these, lipids and lipid-like molecules, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, and organoheterocyclic compounds emerged as the main constituents. Lipids and lipid-like molecules, derivatives of glucose and galactose, amino acids and their derivatives, as well as organoheterocyclic compounds, are likely to play a role in nitrite elimination. Through the enrichment analysis of differential metabolic pathways using KEGG, nine distinct pathways were identified. These pathways provide essential nutrients, maintain cellular structure and function, participate in substance transport, regulate metabolic activities, and enhance resistance against pathogenic microorganisms in L. plantarum A50.

1. Introduction

Nitrites are a commonly employed food additive in the food industry, serving primarily as a preservative and flavor enhancer [1]. Possessing antimicrobial and antioxidative properties, they effectively extend the shelf life of food products and enhance their taste [2,3]. Nitrites inhibit bacterial growth and can react with myoglobin in meat to form stable nitrite–myoglobin complexes, resulting in the vibrant red color of meat [4]. Additionally, research has shown that nitrites and nitrates found in certain foods and diets can be metabolized into nitric oxide, contributing to cardiovascular health and cellular protection [5,6]. Such an application of nitrites is particularly widespread in the processing of meat products, vegetables, and animal feed, including the fermentation of sausages, pickles, and silages [3,7]. Despite these advantages, nitrites come with certain risks and potential hazards. Experimental evidence has indicated that under specific conditions, nitrites can transform into carcinogenic nitrosamines, posing potential threats to human health [8,9]. Moreover, excessive consumption of nitrites can be detrimental to human health, leading to conditions such as hypertension and glioma [10,11]. Given these considerations, a crucial question arises as to whether existing methods can effectively reduce nitrite levels while guaranteeing fermentation quality.
Lactic acid bacteria commonly prevail as the primary microorganisms in the fermentation procedure [12]. Lactic acid bacteria, as a probiotic, possess immense potential in preventing human health-related ailments and aiding in food preservation and fermentation [13]. Throughout the fermentation process, lactic acid bacteria effectively hinder the growth of other microorganisms by reducing the pH levels through the production of acid, thus effectively preventing food spoilage. Moreover, lactic acid bacteria are capable of generating beneficial compounds, such as flavor-enhancing substances, thereby enhancing the taste and overall quality of the food [14]. Furthermore, numerous studies have demonstrated the ability of lactic acid bacteria to eliminate nitrite. Kim et al. [15] scrutinized the effects of lactic acid bacteria on kimchi and discovered that they can directly degrade N-nitrosodimethylamine, subsequently resulting in the reduction of nitrite levels. Lactic acid bacteria achieve this by reducing nitrite either through acid production or nitrite reductase in fermentation products [16,17]. By glycolysis, lactic acid bacteria produce organic acids, including lactic acid and acetic acid. These organic acids possess certain reducing properties, while nitrite exhibits strong oxidizing properties. Consequently, a redox reaction occurs between nitrite and organic acids during fermentation, effectively reducing the nitrite content. Additionally, Paik et al. [18] discovered that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Latilactobacillus curvatus, and Lactobacillus serans possess the capacity to synthesize nitrite reductases. Depending on the reactants and coenzymes, these nitrite reductases can be classified as CuNiRs, cd1NiRs, ccNiRs, and FdNiRs [19]. Aside from acid and enzyme degradation pathways, other compounds such as flavonoids, polyphenols, and ascorbic acid have also demonstrated their influence on nitrite scavenging. Guo et al. [20] discovered a notable association between flavonoids and their capacity to act as antioxidants and eliminate nitrites. Ascorbic acid functions as a reducing agent that converts nitrite to NO, while undergoing oxidation to dehydroascorbic acid. It is important to note that the degradation of nitrite is minimal at pH levels above 4.0 [21,22]. Moreover, the addition of ascorbic acid during fermentation not only reduces nitrite content but also effectively inhibits the formation of nitrosamines [23]. In another study, Seo et al. [24] investigated the production of extracellular polysaccharides by Lactobacillus plantarum YML009. They observed a nitrite-scavenging rate of 43.93%, demonstrating the greater ability of extracellular polysaccharides to degrade nitrite. Furthermore, the higher sugar content in these polysaccharides corresponds to a higher rate of nitrite radical scavenging. Therefore, lactic acid bacteria exhibit diverse mechanisms for nitrite degradation, urging further exploration of their potential in this regard through detailed and comprehensive means.
In recent times, metabolomics has witnessed a growing application in elucidating the metabolic mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria [25,26]. The high resolution and sensitivity associated with LC-MS permit accurate identification of lactic acid bacteria metabolites. In comparison to other analytical techniques, LC-MS provides more intricate details about metabolites and can differentiate between similar compounds, thus assisting in the determination of lactic acid bacteria metabolite structures and species [27]. LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics has the potential to identify new compounds and metabolic pathways in lactic acid bacteria metabolites. A comprehensive analysis of metabolomics can result in the discovery of new bioactives, including active molecules, antimicrobial substances, and antioxidants. The outcomes of this discovery can have beneficial effects in the food, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical industries [28]. Therefore, LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics appears to be a dependable method for metabolic profiling.
In the current research, we conducted a meticulous screening of alfalfa silage, where a remarkable lactic acid bacterial strain (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A50) exhibiting exceptional capacity for nitrite degradation was discovered. The efficiency of nitrite degradation by L. plantarum A50 was an astounding 99.06% within a mere 24 h incubation period. To delve deeper into the metabolic intricacies and furnish more precise, comprehensive, and detailed information, we propose employing LC-MS non-targeted metabolomics analysis to unravel the metabolites produced by L. plantarum A50. This analysis will enlighten us on the biological properties, nitrite-degrading functionality, and potential applications of this strain of lactic acid bacterium. By cultivating L. plantarum A50 in MRS broth, we have successfully identified a plethora of differentially accumulated metabolites and have meticulously scrutinized their implications on biological pathways and nitrite degradation. The findings of this study present additional opportunities for employing L. plantarum A50 in regulating nitrite levels in fermented products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preservation and Activation of L. plantarum A50

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A50 has been deposited at the Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing, and Highly Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, PR of China. The raw data have been uploaded to the NCBI GenBank database, with the accession number SUB 13987624. Upon removal from an ultra-low-temperature refrigerator set at −80 °C, L. plantarum A50 was naturally thawed and subsequently incubated without agitation on MRS solid medium at 37 °C for 12 h. The inoculum of L. plantarum A50 was obtained after three generations of activation.

2.2. Research on the Growth Characteristics and Tolerance of L. plantarum A50

L. plantarum A50 was introduced into MRS broth, while blank MRS broth was used as a reference. The incubation of both samples occurred in a constant-temperature incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. The MRS broth’s pH value and optical density at 600 nm (OD600) value were determined every 2 h to create growth and acid production curves. The MRS broths were prepared with various pH values using lactic acid (Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and sodium lactate (Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), while different salt concentrations were achieved by incorporating NaCl (Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) into the MRS broths. L. plantarum A50 was inoculated into MRS broths with varying pH levels and salt concentrations. After incubation for 12 h at 37 °C in a controlled environment, OD600 measurements were obtained to assess the acid, alkaline, and salt resistance of L. plantarum A50. Based on the research conducted by Wang et al. [29], we classified OD values within the range of 1.0 to 1.5 as indicative of “normal growth,” OD values ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 as “weak growth,” and OD values below 0.5 as indicating “no growth.” The ability of L. plantarum A50 to utilize carbohydrates from 49 different compounds was investigated using the Api 50ch kit (Biomacrieux, Marcy l’ Etoile) [30]. The OD600 measurements obtained in this study were determined using a spectrophotometer, while pH values were determined through the use of an electrode pH meter (PHS-3C, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.3. Research on the Ability of L. plantarum A50 Metabolites to Degrade Nitrite

2.3.1. The Capacity of L. plantarum A50 to Degrade Nitrite

The MRS broth was prepared by adding precise quantities of NaO2 (Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) to the MRS broth, achieving a concentration of 100 mg/L of nitrite. Subsequently, L. plantarum A50 was inoculated into the MRS broth and placed in a constant-temperature incubator at 37 °C. The nitrite content was then assessed at regular intervals of 2 h to construct a nitrite degradation curve. Throughout this study, the Griess method [31] was employed to quantify nitrite concentrations, with absorbance being measured at a wavelength of 538 nm.

2.3.2. The Influence of Varying Acidity on the Degradation of Nitrite

By utilizing lactic acid and sodium lactate, the pH level of deionized water was adjusted to 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, and 6. Subsequently, NaO2 was added to deionized water at different pH levels to configure a nitrite solution with a concentration of 200 mg/L. The samples were then incubated in a constant-temperature chamber at 37 °C for 48 h, with regular assessments of the nitrite salt levels every 12 h. Lastly, the decomposition of nitrite salts under various pH conditions was observed.

2.3.3. The Capacity of Metabolites Derived from L. plantarum A50 and MRS Broth in the Degradation of Nitrite

L. plantarum A50 was introduced into MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C in a thermostatic incubator for 48 h, with MRS broth serving as the control. Following the incubation period, both the L. plantarum A50 fermentation broth and the MRS broth without the added strain were subjected to centrifugation (4 °C, 10,000 g/min, 15 min). The resulting supernatants were then filtered through a 0.22 µm sterile membrane filter (Millipore Corporation, NYSE, USA) to obtain the L. plantarum A50 fermentation broth supernatant and the MRS broth supernatant, respectively. At this time, the pH of the L. plantarum A50 fermentation broth and the MRS broth supernatant measured 3.46 and 5.52, respectively. The pH of a portion of the MRS broth supernatant was adjusted to 3.46, matching the pH of the L. plantarum A50 fermentation supernatant. NaO2 was introduced into both the L. plantarum A50 fermentation broth supernatant (at pH 3.46) and the MRS broth supernatant (at pH 3.46 and 5.52) to achieve a nitrite concentration of 130 mg/L. The incubation was conducted in a constant-temperature incubator at 37 °C for 24 h, during which the nitrite levels were measured every 6 h to assess the differences in nitrite degradation by the metabolites of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth during the cultivation process.

2.3.4. The Influence of Varying Levels of Acidity on the Capacity of L. plantarum A50 Metabolites to Degrade Nitrite

The concentration of nitrite in the supernatant was adjusted to 140 mg/L by adding an appropriate amount of NaO2. A portion of the supernatant from L. plantarum A50 was then subjected to heat treatment in a water bath at 100 °C for 15 min to inactivate the enzymes present. At this point, the pH of the enzyme-inactivated supernatant was measured to be 3.38. Subsequently, the pH of the uninactivated supernatant was adjusted to 3.38, while the pH of the enzyme-inactivated supernatant was adjusted to 3.88, 4.38, 4.88, and 5.38 using lactic acid and sodium lactate. The supernatant was then incubated at a constant temperature of 37 °C for 24 h, with measurements of nitrite content taken every 6 h. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the capability of A50 metabolites to eradicate nitrite in varying pH conditions.

2.4. Conducting an Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis on the Fermentation Broth of L. plantarum A50

2.4.1. Sample Preparation

L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth underwent incubation at a precisely controlled temperature of 37 °C for a duration of 36 h. Following this, the fermentation broth was subjected to vigorous centrifugation (4 °C, 8000 g/min, 15 min) to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was then filtrated through a sterile 0.22 µm filter and promptly stored in an ultra-low-temperature refrigerator (−80 °C).
Upon retrieval, the samples were thawed on a bed of ice, and 100 µL of each sample was carefully transferred into sterile and enzyme-free 2 mL centrifuge tubes. To each tube, 400 µL of meticulously chilled methanol (−20 °C) was added, ensuring thorough mixture by vortexing for 60 s. The samples were then subjected to another round of swift centrifugation (4 °C, 10,000 g/min, 10 min), and the resulting supernatant was vacuum-concentrated and freeze-dried. To prepare the samples for LC-MS detection, precise amounts of 2-chlorophenylalanine (4 ppm) and phenylalanine (4 ppm) were added, concluding with a thorough filtration through sterile 0.22 µm filters. Subsequently, a comprehensive mixing was performed. To assess the reproducibility of the entire analytical process, an equal volume of metabolites from all samples was collected and combined to form a quality control (QC) sample.

2.4.2. LC-MS/MS Data Analysis

The samples were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis utilizing a Thermo UHPLC-Q Exactive HF-X system, which was equipped with an ACQUITY HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.8 μm; Waters, MA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The mobile phases comprised a mixture of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile (solvent A), with a ratio of 95:5 (v/v), and a combination of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, isopropanol, and water (solvent B), with a ratio of 47.5:47.5 (v/v). For positive ion mode separation, the gradient was as follows: from 0% to 20% of mobile phase B within 0–3 min, followed by an increase from 20% to 35% within 3–4.5 min, and subsequently, a rise from 35% to 100% within 4.5–5 min. Mobile phase B was maintained at 100% for 5–6.3 min, and then decreased from 100% to 0% within 6.3–6.4 min. Finally, mobile phase B was kept at 0% for 6.4–8 min. As for negative ion mode separation, the gradient was as follows: an increase in mobile phase B from 0% to 5% within 0–1.5 min, followed by a rise from 5% to 10% within 1.5–2 min, and subsequently, an increase from 10% to 30% within 2–4.5 min. During the 4.5–5 min interval, mobile phase B was elevated from 30% to 100%, and maintained at 100% from 5–6.3 min. The decrease in mobile phase B from 100% to 0% occurred within 6.3–6.4 min, and mobile phase B was maintained at 0% from 6.4–8 min. The flow rate was set at 0.40 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. The mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using a Thermo UHPLC-Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer, equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The analysis was performed in both positive and negative modes. The optimized parameters included a source temperature of 425 °C, a sheath gas flow rate of 50 arb, an auxiliary gas flow rate of 13 arb, and an ion-spray voltage floating (ISVF) of −3500 V in negative mode and 3500 V in positive mode, respectively. The collision energy for MS/MS was varied in a rolling fashion, employing 20–40-60 V. The full MS resolution was set at 60,000 and the MS/MS resolution at 7500. Data acquisition was carried out utilizing the data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode, with a mass range of 70–1050 m/z.

2.4.3. Data Analysis

The LC/MS raw data underwent preliminary processing using Progenesis QI software provided by Waters Corporation, located in Milford, KS, USA. Subsequently, a CSV-formatted three-dimensional data matrix was exported, containing crucial information such as sample details, metabolite names, and intensity of mass spectral response. The data matrix was carefully curated by eliminating internal standard peaks and any anticipated false positive peaks, encompassing noise, column bleed, and derivatized reagent peaks. Simultaneously, metabolite identification was executed via meticulous exploration of renowned databases, primarily focusing on the HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/) and Metlin (https://metlin.scripps.edu/) accessed on 15 October 2023.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were performed with a total of 6 repetitions. The preprocessed data matrices were subjected to a technique called orthogonal least partial squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), utilizing the ropls package in R (Version 1.6.2). To identify metabolites that exhibited significant differences, variable weight values (VIP) derived from the OPLS-DA model and p-values from Student’s t-test were used. Metabolites with VIP values exceeding 1 and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The metabolic pathways associated with these differentially expressed metabolites were determined through the process of metabolic pathway annotation, employing the KEGG database (https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html) accessed on 20 October 2023. Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted using the scipy.stats Python package (1.6.0). Visual representation of the data was achieved by generating line plots using Origin 2022, while bar plots were created using GraphPad Prism 10.

3. Results

3.1. The Growth Trajectories and Physiological as well as Biochemical Markers of Lactobacillus plantarum A50

The growth rate profile of L. plantarum A50 is depicted in Figure 1 whereby a higher optical density (OD) indicates a greater pace of growth for the lactic acid bacteria. In the initial 0–4 h of incubation, the growth of L. plantarum A50 exhibited a relatively sluggish pattern, which subsequently accelerated during the 6–16 h interval. Notably, beyond the 16 h mark, the growth rate displayed a gradual incline. Moving on to the acid production capacity, Figure 1 visualizes the curve while considering an initial pH value of 5.61 at the beginning of incubation. During the initial 0–6 h of incubation, the acid production rate remained subdued but significantly escalated from 8–12 h. Moreover, the pH value registered a gradual decrease after the 12 h mark, reaching its nadir at 3.66 after 24 h.

3.2. Research on the Nitrite Degradation Ability of L. plantarum A50

The degradation progress of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 over 24 h is illustrated in Figure 2A. The initial nitrite degradation rate by L. plantarum A50 was relatively slow within the first 6 h. However, a notable acceleration in degradation was observed during the subsequent 6–12 h, which yielded the highest degradation rate. At the 12 h mark, the degradation rate of nitrite reached an impressive 82.67%. During the 12–24 h period of incubation, the degradation rate of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 exhibited a gradual and steady decline. Remarkably, an extraordinary degradation rate of 99.06% was attained at 24 h.
The degradation trends of nitrite under varying pH levels are depicted in Figure 2B. As the pH decreased, the extent of nitrite degradation exhibited an increment. Within the pH range of 4.5–6.0, the nitrite concentration in the solution experienced minimal changes over time, showing a degradation rate ranging from 10.53% to 17.38% after 48 h. Remarkably, at pH 4, the nitrite content declined significantly, resulting in a degradation rate of 51.60% within the same time frame. Notably, at pH 3 and 3.5, the nitrite degradation rates were exceptionally high, reaching 95.00% and 83.21%, respectively.
The capacity of metabolites from L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth to degrade nitrite is illustrated in Figure 2C. Among the experimental groups, the control MRS broth (pH 5.62) exhibited the least effective nitrite degradation, whereas the L. plantarum A50 supernatant group showcased the most remarkable nitrite degradation. Remarkably, the L. plantarum A50 supernatant group displayed the swiftest rate of nitrite degradation within the initial 12 h, achieving an impressive degradation rate of 73.48%. Subsequently, there was a gradual decline in the nitrite content in the L. plantarum A50 supernatant group, with degradation rates reaching 80.04% and 87.72% at 18 h and 24 h, respectively.
As depicted in Figure 2D, the degradation profile of L. plantarum A50 metabolites illustrates that the nitrite degradation rate of L. plantarum A50 metabolites was most rapid in the initial 6 h. Specifically, at pH 3.38, the nitrite degradation rate was 90.66% in the L. plantarum A50 fermentation broth, while the enzyme inactivation group exhibited rates of 91.58%, 81.45%, 76.39%, and 67.18% at pH 3.88, 4.38, 4.88, and 5.38, respectively. Notably, the nitrite content was minimized after 24 h of incubation, with the enzyme-inactivated group displaying degradation rates of 98.48%, 97.56%, 94.34%, 84.86%, and 80.12% at pH values of 3.38, 3.88, 4.38, 4.88, and 5.38, respectively.

3.3. Metabolite Analysis of L. plantarum A50

The fermentation broths of L. plantarum A50 and MRS were subjected to non-targeted LC-MS analysis. To ensure accurate identification of differential metabolites, quality control (QC) procedures were implemented to minimize errors. The QC-treated samples exhibited improved aggregation, with approximately 70% demonstrating an RSD of less than 30%, ensuring the reliability of the data [32]. Figure 3 displays the PLS-DA score plot, which validates the metabolite differences between the two groups and shows the multivariate analysis. This plot is commonly used to visualize the classification effect of the model, where a greater separation between the sample groups indicates a more significant classification effect. Furthermore, the data points within the QC cohort exhibited a remarkable convergence, implying a commendable level of reproducibility during the procedure of sample acquisition. For the analysis of cations, the utilization of intrasample group clustering paired with intergroup discretization yielded an R2X value of 0.764, R2Y value of 0.99, and Q value of 0.954. As for the analysis of anions, the application of intrasample group clustering in combination with intergroup discretization produced an R2X value of 0.773, R2Y value of 0.98, and Q value of 0.956. Furthermore, to evaluate the potential issue of overfitting in the model, PLS-DA alignment plots were employed. It is worth noting that in cation and anion modes, L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth were distinctly segregated into two groups, underscoring the influential role of L. plantarum A50 on the metabolites present in MRS broth.
The fermented solutions of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth were used as the experimental group and control group, respectively. Following Figure 4, a total of 362 different metabolites were identified in both the experimental and control groups, and these were subsequently classified based on their chemical structures. These classifications included 91 lipids and lipid-like molecules, 85 organic acids and derivatives, 47 organoheterocyclic compounds, 35 organic oxygen compounds, 23 phenylpropanoids and polyketides, 19 benzenoids, 6 alkaloids and derivatives, 6 nucleosides, nucleotides, and analogues, 2 organosulfur compounds, 1 organic nitrogen compound, 1 organic polymer, and 41 unclassified compounds. According to Figure 5A, 52 cationic substances displayed an up-regulation trend, whereas 99 cationic substances displayed a down-regulation trend. Moreover, 81 anionic substances exhibited an up-regulation pattern, while 130 anionic substances showed a down-regulation pattern.
Figure 6 presents the annotated differential metabolites from the HMDB, categorized under the superclass hierarchy. Lipids and lipid-like molecules, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, and organoheterocyclic compounds exhibited a higher percentage of differential metabolites. Therefore, these four superclass hierarchies were selected for visualization and mapping purposes in this study.
As depicted in Figure 6A, a majority of the metabolites in the lipids and lipid-like molecules superclass displayed down-regulation. Examples include 9S-hydroxy-11,15-dioxo-5Z,13E-prostadienoic acid, 14-HDOHE, vulgarin, ginsenoside C-K, indosterol, (+)-dehydrovomifoliol, progestoral, testosterone undecanoate, and 6-Epi-7-isocucurbic acid glucoside. Figure 6B illustrates that the organic acids and derivatives superclass primarily consists of amino acids, amides, peptides, and their derivatives. Notable examples include hydroxypropionic acid, histidylprolineamide, serylasparagine, N-linoleoyl methionine, Leu-Arg-Asn-Arg, N-linoleoyl glutamine, L-methionine, 2-acetylornithine, isoleucyl-aspartate, spermic acid 2, N-docosahexaenoyl glutamine, and isoleucyl-lysine. Moreover, Figure 6C depicts that the organoheterocyclic compounds superclass primarily consists of 5-methylcytosine, cimetidine, 2-beta-hydroxymedroxyprogesterone, dipropyl-5-CT, 5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 2-(2-phenylimidazo [1,2-a]pyridin-8-yl) acetamide, navoximod, hypoxanthine, and 5-methylcytosine. Lastly, Figure 6D shows that the organic oxygen compounds superclass mainly comprises glucose and galactose derivatives such as gluconolactone, tyramine glucuronide, pyridine N-oxide glucuronide, O-desmethyltramadol glucuronide, 6″-O alpha-D-galactopyranosylciceritol, and 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-alpha-D-galactopyranose.
To explore the modified metabolic pathways and their biological significance, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify the biological pathways involved in differentially expressed metabolites and their respective roles (Figure 7A,B). The results suggest that nine metabolic pathways were significantly impacted with lower p-values and higher pathway impact factors observed between L. plantarum A50 and the control group. These pathways include those associated with glycerophospholipid metabolism, ABC transporters, nucleotide metabolism, arginine biosynthesis, pyrimidine metabolism, purine metabolism, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, pathogenic Escherichia coli infection, and D-amino-acid-metabolism-related pathways.

4. Discussion

4.1. Physiological Characteristics of L. plantarum A50

The findings of this study indicate that L. plantarum A50, isolated from silage, exhibits a high acid-producing ability, with a fermentation liquid pH of 3.66 after 24 h of cultivation. L. plantarum A50 demonstrates good growth at pH values ranging from 4 to 9 and salt concentrations of 5%, demonstrating its excellent salt, acid, and alkali tolerance, positioning it as a desirable lactic acid bacterium for fermentation (Supplementary Figure S1). In comparison to traditional carbohydrate fermentation tests, the Api 50ch method proves to be a faster and more accurate approach [33]. Consistent with the previous research by McDonald et al. [34], it is observed in this study that L. plantarum A50 shows excellent utilization of the 24 tested carbohydrates for fermentation (Supplementary Table S1). However, the fermentation substrates of L. plantarum A50 differ from those screened by Cai et al. [35] for Pediococcus pentosaceus. This discrepancy may be attributed to variations in bacterial species or geographical environments [36].

4.2. Degradation of Nitrite by L. plantarum A50

In the present study on the degradation of nitrite in acidic conditions, it was observed that the nitrite content decreased as the pH decreased. Interestingly, the rate of nitrite degradation was found to increase significantly when the pH dropped below 4. This suggests that acid degradation gradually becomes the dominant factor in nitrite degradation when the pH is below 4, which aligns with earlier research [37]. In our study, we noticed that the degradation of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 mainly occurred between 6 and 12 h of incubation, with a pH of 4.14 at the 12 h mark. Therefore, it can be inferred that the degradation of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 may not be primarily driven by acid degradation. However, after 12 h of incubation, the pH fell below 4.0, which implies that the degradation of nitrite may then be dominated by acid degradation. Consequently, we conducted further investigation into the mechanism of nitrite degradation by L. plantarum A50 metabolites.
The metabolites derived from the strain L. plantarum A50 exhibited a remarkable nitrite degradation rate of 87.72% after 24 h of incubation. This result indicates that the metabolites produced by L. plantarum A50 possess a strong ability to scavenge nitrite. In parallel, the control group, consisting of MRS broth, also demonstrated nitrite degradation capability. Interestingly, it was observed that MRS broth and acid exhibited a synergistic effect in nitrite degradation, which is in line with the findings from Xia et al. [38]. Specifically, Xia et al. [38] proposed that MRS broth contains components such as peptone and yeast extracts, which may undergo compositional changes following autoclave treatment, thereby contributing to the reduction of nitrite. These results provide further insights into the potential mechanisms underlying nitrite degradation facilitated by the metabolites of L. plantarum A50 and the influence of MRS broth in this process.
Despite the inactivation of enzymes in the supernatant of L. plantarum A50, its strong ability to degrade nitrate can still be observed. L. plantarum A50 demonstrated maximized degradation efficacy of its metabolites at a pH of 3.38, achieving an impressive degradation rate of 98.48%. Even when the pH rose to 5.38, L. plantarum A50 still exhibited notable degradation capacity with a rate of 80.20%. These findings unequivocally indicate that the degradation of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 metabolites progressively intensified as the pH decreased, thus confirming the collaborative influence of metabolites and acidity in nitrite degradation.

4.3. Metabolite Analysis of L. plantarum A50

Lipids and lipid-like metabolites were predominantly down-regulated, indicating the utilization of lipids by L. plantarum A50 for metabolic processes. Lactic acid bacteria can convert fatty acids into energy through lipid metabolism [39]. Fatty acids play a crucial role in providing energy to lactic acid bacteria and facilitating the maintenance of their required energy supply for vital life activities [40]. Additionally, lipids serve as important components of cell membranes, and lactic acid bacteria synthesize phospholipids essential for maintaining the integrity and functionality of these membranes through lipid metabolism [41]. Signaling molecules produced by lactic acid bacteria as a result of lipid metabolism, such as fatty acid metabolites and derivatives, are implicated in intercellular signaling and regulation. These signaling molecules can impact cell growth, metabolism, and physiological functions [42]. Furthermore, lactic acid bacteria lipid metabolites form a protective lipid barrier on the cell membrane, enabling survival in unfavorable environments characterized by higher acidity and anaerobic conditions as well as protecting cells from oxidative stress and damage [43]. Huang et al. [44] observed that Lactobacillus plantarum 9010 cells without nitrite supplementation possessed a smooth surface and intact cell shape. However, as the nitrite concentration increased, some L. plantarum 9010 cells displayed surface irregularities, and with further increases in nitrite concentration, certain L. plantarum cells experienced rupture, resulting in cytoplasmic leakage. Previous studies have demonstrated that nitrite causes severe damage to bacterial DNA [45]. Bacteria combat this damage by inducing an SOS response to accelerate replication and transcription, enabling the generation of more individuals as a response to environmental stress [45]. Therefore, it is plausible to propose that lipid metabolism may serve as a potential mechanism through which L. plantarum A50 protects cells from nitrite-induced stress and damage by effectively scavenging nitrite ions.
The classification of organic acids and derivatives primarily comprises amino acids, amides, peptides, and their derivatives, which play crucial physiological roles in organisms, involving biological processes like protein synthesis, hormone regulation, and cell signaling [46,47]. Research indicates that most amino acids possess the ability to degrade nitrite [48]. Ornithine acts as a precursor for proline and, thus, an enhanced metabolism of N2-acetylornithine may impact the production of proline and potentially promote the formation of histidylprolineamide. Amino acids can be metabolized through methionine, which in turn participates in sulfur metabolism [49]. Enzymatic reactions, such as hydroxypropionic acid hydroxylase, can convert hydroxypropionic acid into alanine. The transmembrane transport of both alanine and methionine is vital for cellular metabolism and nutrient transportation [50]. It has been discovered that alanine can stimulate microbial activity during the nitrogen cycle through cleavage [51]. Therefore, the heightened metabolic process of hydroxypropionic acid and L-methionine signifies an elevated level of metabolic activity within L. plantarum A50, thereby fostering the advancement of nitrite degradation [52]. Threonine and methionine serve as substrates for isoleucine synthesis, and their synthesis and catabolism under diverse developmental and environmental conditions also impact the availability of isoleucine [53]. Isoleucine participates in metabolic pathways and biological functions of cells, and it has a specific function in the protein-folding process of membrane proteins [54]. Isoleucyl-aspartate is a peptide that is formed by the combination of two amino acids, isoleucyl and aspartate, through peptide bonding. A previous study [55] discovered a correlation between nitrite reductase and acetolactate synthase activities in cells following the activities of glutamine synthetase, aspartate aminotransferase, and phosphoglycan dehydrogenase. Aspartate aminotransferase is closely associated with the metabolism of aspartic acid and is involved in the conversion of aspartic acid and α-ketoglutaric acid [56]. Serylasparagine is a type of secondary metabolite that contains asparagine. Therefore, we hypothesized that isoleucyl-aspartate and serylasparagine may play a direct or indirect role in nitrite degradation. Bacteria can reduce aspartic acid to semialdehyde, which then condenses with pyruvate to form lysine. Lysine provides energy for biological metabolism and promotes glucose synthesis [57]. Thus, the enhancement of isoleucyl-lysine metabolism may contribute to nitrite reduction. Leu-Arg-Asn-Arg is a peptide that may mimic the functions of leucine, arginine, and asparagine. Therefore, Leu-Arg-Asn-Arg may have the ability to reduce nitrite. Spermic acid 2 belongs to the class of organic compounds known as β-amino acids and their derivatives. According to a literature review, there have been few published articles specifically addressing the role of spermic acid 2, and further research is needed in this regard. N-linoleoyl glutamine, N-docosahexaenoyl glutamine, and N-linoleoyl methionine are derivatives of fatty acids. Increasing the concentration of fatty acids may activate defense systems and enhance tolerance to nitrite [58]. However, the exact mechanism by which fatty acids interact with nitrites remains unclear, warranting further investigation. A study involving blue-green algae [59] has suggested that promoting glutamine synthetase activity can reduce nitrate and nitrite levels, but there is limited research available on the specific effects of N-linoleoyl glutamine and N-docosahexaenoyl glutamine, necessitating further study.
Predominantly derived from glucose and galactose in the classification of organic oxygen compounds, gluconolactone, tyramine glucuronide, pyridine N-oxide glucuronide, and O-desmethyltramadol glucuronide are generated by L. plantarum A50 through the process of glucose metabolism to produce derivatives. Lactic acid bacteria are incapable of utilizing complex carbohydrates, such as cellulose, as an energy source, whereas glucose, being a simple sugar, assumes a pivotal role in the energy metabolism of lactic acid bacteria [60]. Lactic acid bacteria can effectively harness the potential energy and essential raw materials for growth from glucose through glycolysis and other metabolic pathways. Glucose fermentation carried out by lactic acid bacteria leads to the production of organic acids like lactic acid and acetic acid [61]. These organic acids serve as the primary products of lactic acid bacteria fermentation, contributing to the regulation of the acid–base balance and inhibition of the growth of other detrimental microorganisms [62]. Simultaneously, organic acids also serve as a significant means of nitrite degradation. Furthermore, Ma et al. [63] propose that glucose augments the effectiveness of nitrite reductase, thereby facilitating denitrification mediated by denitrifying and anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Consequently, the metabolic utilization of glucose by lactic acid bacteria emerges as a pivotal avenue to augment the decomposition of nitrite.
D-galactose is a type of galactose, and both 6″-O-alpha-D-galactopyranosylciceritol and 2-deoxy-2-fluoroalpha-D-galactopyranose are considered galactose derivatives. Similar to glucose, D-galactose is also an important monosaccharide. Lactic acid bacteria are capable of converting D-galactose into pyruvate and lactic acid while generating intermediate metabolites like lactaldehyde and gluconic acid. According to Shi et al. [52], the presence of NaNO2 in the fermentation medium increases the energy required for cellular survival, consequently elevating the demand for glucose. Moreover, in the presence of NaNO2, carbohydrate metabolism is enhanced, leading to improved energy supply and enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress. In a study conducted by Li et al. [64], it was demonstrated that sucrose and glucose, which are involved in the metabolism of D-galactose, starch, and sucrose, can provide energy for the growth and proliferation of lactic acid bacteria, resulting in intensified anaerobic metabolism and reduced nitrite levels.
The presence of organoheterocyclic compounds in the metabolites of L. plantarum A50 holds crucial implications for the biological significance of this strain, albeit with limited specific investigations in this domain. Organoheterocyclic compounds represent a class of compounds comprising carbon and other elements such as oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur, exhibiting diverse biological activities within living organisms. The organoheterocyclic compounds investigated in this study primarily encompass pyrazoles, imidazoles, isoindoles, indazoles, and indolecarboxylic acids and their derivatives. Prior research has demonstrated the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of pyrazoles [65], imidazoles [66], indazoles [67], isoindoles, and indolecarboxylic acids and derivatives [68,69]. These substances possess the ability to exert an impact on the intricate dynamics between lactic acid bacteria and their microbial counterparts, facilitating their sustenance and proliferation within a specific milieu through the suppression of growth and metabolic processes of the latter [70]. Furthermore, the presence of these compounds exhibits antioxidant effects; for instance, certain components of indolecarboxylic acids and derivatives may possess antioxidant activity that aids lactic acid bacteria in combating cellular oxidative stress [68]. This antioxidative capability assists in maintaining cellular homeostasis and function by scavenging free radicals and safeguarding essential intracellular molecules against oxidative damage. Hence, the down-regulation observed in this study of cimetidine, 2-beta-hydroxymedroxyprogesterone, and dipropyl-5-CT might have facilitated the proliferation and reproductive capacity of L. plantarum A50. Conversely, the up-regulation of 5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 2-(2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-8-yl)acetamide, and navoximod could potentially serve as a defense mechanism for L. plantarum A50 against external threats or aid in the production of bacteriostatic substances. The breakdown of hypoxanthine in organisms can be potentially perilous as it stimulates the production of urate and, most notably, hydrogen peroxide [71]. The decrease in the level of hypoxanthine observed in this study may suggest that L. plantarum A50 was reducing the generation of urate and hydrogen peroxide to minimize the oxidative harm inflicted upon cells and tissues. In bacteria, 5-methylcytosine primarily impacts gene expression and transcriptional processes, and it may assume a vital regulatory role in the SOS response [72]. Consequently, the up-regulation of 5-methylcytosine may indicate that L. plantarum A50 possesses the ability to actively counteract DNA damage and initiate the corresponding protective mechanisms.
Enrichment analysis using KEGG was performed to identify the biological pathways associated with differentially expressed metabolites and their roles in the survival, adaptation, and probiotic function of lactic acid bacteria. The metabolic pathways involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, and purine metabolism are essential for meeting the nutritional needs of lactic acid bacteria, providing important nutrients such as lipids, nucleotides, and amino acids [73,74,75]. Furthermore, glycerophospholipid metabolism contributes to the formation and structural integrity of lactic acid bacterial cell membranes, including the transport, signaling, and stability of phospholipid molecules [73]. In addition, lactic acid bacteria employ ABC transporter proteins to regulate the uptake and excretion of substances, maintain the balance between intra- and extracellular environments, and respond to environmental changes [76]. Additionally, metabolic pathways such as arginine biosynthesis [77], aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis [78], and D-amino acid metabolism [79] are involved in the synthesis and alteration of amino acids and proteins. These processes have an impact on intracellular enzyme activity, protein structure, and function, as well as the synthesis and release of metabolic products in lactic acid bacteria. D-amino acid is derived from cell wall synthesis, protein degradation, and external sources, and it plays a crucial role in the growth and metabolism of lactic acid bacterial cells [80]. Nonetheless, Soutourina et al. [81] suggest that an overabundance of D-amino acids can hinder bacterial growth by potentially hindering protein synthesis and resulting in an accumulation of tRNAs that do not match with D-amino acids. Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis is employed by lactic acid bacteria to facilitate protein synthesis. This metabolic pathway involves the activation and binding of amino acids to tRNAs, providing the essential substrates and catalysts needed for the synthesis of proteins with specific amino acid sequences in lactic acid bacterial cells [82]. Apart from their catalytic role in protein synthesis, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases can be regarded as fundamental signaling molecules. The ability of these enzymes to interact with tRNAs extends to other cellular nucleic acid molecules, thus regulating various biological processes including transcription, splicing, and translation [83]. The noticeable reduction of metabolites in pathogenic Escherichia coli infections suggests that lactic acid bacteria enhance resistance against harmful microorganisms, reinforce the immune response, and lower the risk of pathogenic-microbe-induced diseases [84]. In aggregate, these metabolic pathways serve vital functions in Lactobacilli, bolstering their proliferation and metabolic requirements, while also influencing the composition of their cell membranes, facilitation of material transportation, synthesis and modification of proteins, as well as enhancing resistance against pathogenic microorganisms.

5. Conclusions

L. plantarum A50 exhibits commendable tolerance to salt, acid, and alkali, allowing for fermentation with a diverse range of carbon sources. Moreover, it demonstrates an impressive capacity for the removal of nitrite, with a remarkable degradation rate of 99.06% within 24 h. The degradation of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 predominantly occurs in a non-acidic manner from 6–12 h, transitioning to an acidic process thereafter. Furthermore, the metabolites produced by L. plantarum A50 show superiority in terms of nitrite-scavenging ability and exhibit synergistic effects when combined with acid. A comprehensive LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomic analysis of L. plantarum A50 metabolites yielded the identification of 342 metabolites that exhibited significant differences. The heightened metabolic levels of lipids and lipid-like molecules, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, and organoheterocyclic compounds, amongst other substances, may potentially contribute to the clearance process of nitrites. Notably, upon conducting KEGG differential metabolic pathway enrichment analysis, nine distinct differential metabolic pathways were identified. These pathways are proposed to provide essential nutrients to support the growth of L. plantarum A50, maintain the integrity of cellular structure and function, facilitate substance transport, regulate metabolic activities, and enhance resilience against pathogenic microorganisms. Despite the insightful findings derived from this single-omics investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge its inherent limitations. Therefore, future studies should aim to delve further into the mechanism of nitrite degradation by L. plantarum A50 by employing advanced methodologies such as genomics and transcriptomics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10020092/s1, Figure S1: The ability of L. plantarum A50 to withstand acidity and alkalinity (A) as well as salt tolerance (B); Table S1: The carbohydrate fermentation characteristics of L. plantarum A50.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing: J.A. Writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing: L.S. Methodology: M.L. Writing—review and editing: R.D. Writing—review and editing: Q.S. Investigation and resources: Z.W. Writing—review and editing: G.G. Project administration and funding acquisition: Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Special Fund for the Commercialization of Scientific and Technological Achievements Project in Inner Mongolia (2021CG0006) and National Dairy Technology Innovation Center (2021-National Dairy Innovation Center-1), China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequencing data for 16S rDNA gene sequence were stored in NCBI with GenBank accession number SUB 13987624.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yihe Lvjin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. (Aluhorqin Banner, Chifeng, China) for providing alfalfa and Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Hohhot, China) for providing the microbiology laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS); Mortensen, A.; Aguilar, F.; Crebelli, R.; Di Domenico, A.; Dusemund, B.; Frutos, M.J.; Galtier, P.; Gott, D.; Gundert-Remy, U.; et al. Re-evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. MAC Donald, B.; Gray, J.I.; Gibbins, L.N. Role of nitrite in cured meat flavor: Antioxidant role of nitrite. J. Food Sci. 1980, 45, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Macdougall, D.B.; Mottram, D.S.; Rhodes, D.N. Contribution of nitrite and nitrate to the colour and flavour of cured meats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1975, 26, 1743–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shakil, M.H.; Trisha, A.T.; Rahman, M.; Talukdar, S.; Kobun, R.; Huda, N.; Zzaman, W. Nitrites in Cured Meats, Health Risk Issues, Alternatives to Nitrites: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calvert, J.W.; Lefer, D.J. Clinical translation of nitrite therapy for cardiovascular diseases. Nitric Oxide 2010, 22, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Bryan, N.S. Nitrite and nitrate: Cardiovascular risk–benefit and metabolic effect. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2011, 22, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. König, W.; König, E.; Weiss, K.; Tuomivirta, T.T.; Fritze, H.; Elo, K.; Vanhatalo, A.; Jaakkola, S. Impact of hexamine addition to a nitrite-based additive on fermentation quality, Clostridia and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a white lupin-wheat silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Niklas, A.A.; Borge, G.I.A.; Rødbotten, R.; Berget, I.; Müller, M.H.B.; Herrmann, S.S.; Granby, K.; Kirkhus, B. Levels of nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines in model sausages during heat treatment and in vitro digestion—The impact of adding nitrite and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Food Res. Int. 2023, 166, 112595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wolff, I.A.; Wasserman, A.E. Nitrates, Nitrites, and Nitrosamines. Science 1972, 177, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Srour, B.; Chazelas, E.; Fezeu, L.K.; Javaux, G.; Pierre, F.; Huybrechts, I.; Hercberg, S.; Deschasaux-Tanguy, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Touvier, M. Nitrites, Nitrates, and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Are We Living “La Vie en Rose” with Pink Processed Meats? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e027627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, W.; Jiang, J.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Yin, S.; Chen, F.; Li, W. Association between Dietary Nitrite intake and Glioma Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 910476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hartinger, T.; Kube, K.; Gresner, N.; Südekum, K.H. Varying ensiling conditions affect the fermentation quality and abundance of bacterial key players in lucerne silages. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 158, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seddik, H.A.; Bendali, F.; Gancel, F.; Fliss, I.; Spano, G.; Drider, D. Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Probiotic and Food Potentialities. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2017, 9, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xia, L.; Qian, M.; Cheng, F.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Tian, J.; Jin, Y. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on lipid metabolism and flavor of fermented sausages. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, S.-H.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Ha, E.-S.; Sung, N.-J.; Kim, J.G.; Chung, M.J. Lactic acid bacteria directly degrade N-nitrosodimethylamine and increase the nitrite-scavenging ability in kimchi. Food Control 2017, 71, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, S.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Nitrite Degradation during Pickle Fermentation. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 781–784, 1656–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, T.; Mei, L.; Wang, Z.-G.; Xue, X.-H. Morphological and genetic responses of lactobacillus plantarum FQR to nitrite and its practical applications. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paik, H.D.; Lee, J.Y. Investigation of reduction and tolerance capability of lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi against nitrate and nitrite in fermented sausage condition. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Merkle, A.C.; Lehnert, N. Binding and activation of nitrite and nitric oxide by copper nitrite reductase and corresponding model complexes. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 3355–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, H.; Saravanakumar, K.; Wang, M.-H. Total phenolic, flavonoid contents and free radical scavenging capacity of extracts from tubers of Stachys affinis. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rocha, B.S.; Gago, B.; Rui, M.B.; Laranjinha, J. Diffusion of nitric oxide through the gastric wall upon reduction of nitrite by red wine: Physiological impact. Nitric Oxide 2010, 22, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brandao, G.C.; Lima, D.C.; Ferreira, S.L.C. The chemical generation of NO for the determination of nitrite by high-resolution continuum source molecular absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2012, 98, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ding, Z.; Johanningsmeier, S.D.; Price, R.; Reynolds, R.; Truong, V.-D.; Payton, S.C.; Breidt, F. Evaluation of nitrate and nitrite contents in pickled fruit and vegetable products. Food Control 2018, 90, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rather, I. Partially Purified Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum YML009 with Total Phenolic Content, Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Efficacy. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2015, 4, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, J.; Geng, Y.; Xia, H.; Ma, D.; Liu, C.; Wu, R.; Wu, J.; You, S.; Bi, Y. LAB Fermentation Improves Production of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Withania somnifera Extract and Its Metabolic Signatures as Revealed by LC-MS/MS. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 32, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Valerio, F.; Di Biase, M.; Lattanzio, V.M.T.; Lavermicocca, P. Improvement of the antifungal activity of lactic acid bacteria by addition to the growth medium of phenylpyruvic acid, a precursor of phenyllactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 222, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, A.; Yan, G.; Zhang, Y.; An, N.; Wang, X. Berberine Ameliorates Nonbacterial Prostatitis via Multi-Target Metabolic Network Regulation. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2015, 19, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto, A.I.; González, A.G.; Soria-Díaz, M.E.; Cameán, A.M. Cylindrospermopsin determination in water by LC-MS/MS: Optimization and validation of the method and application to real samples. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31, 2233–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, S.; Li, J.; Dong, Z.; Chen, L.; Yuan, X.; Shao, T. The effects of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from various substrates on the fermentation quality of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) in Tibet. Grass Forage Sci. 2018, 73, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cai, Y.; Benno, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Kumai, S. Effect of Applying Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Forage Crops on Fermentation Characteristics and Aerobic Deterioration of Silage. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Griess, P. Bemerkungen zu der Abhandlung der HH. Weselsky und Benedikt “Ueber einige Azoverbindungen”. Berichte Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1879, 12, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Want, E.J.; Wilson, I.D.; Gika, H.; Theodoridis, G.; Plumb, R.S.; Shockcor, J.; Holmes, E.; Nicholson, J.K. Global metabolic profiling procedures for urine using UPLC-MS. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1005–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kerr, K.G.; Rotowa, N.A.; Hawkey, P.M.; Lacey, R.W. Evaluation of the Mast ID and API 50CH systems for identification of Listeria spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Webster, J. The Biochemistry of Silage (Second Edition). By P. McDonald, A.R. Henderson and S. J. E. Heron. Marlow, Bucks, UK: Chalcombe Publications, (1991), pp. 340, £49.50, ISBN 0-948617-225. Exp. Agric. 1992, 28, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cai, Y.; Kumai, S.; Ogawa, M.; Benno, Y.; Nakase, T. Characterization and identification of Pediococcus species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2901–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, S.C.; Chang, C.K.; Chan, S.C.; Shieh, J.S.; Chiu, C.K.; Duh, P.-D. Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented mustard on lowering cholesterol. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shibukawa, T.; Ohira, Y.; Shimadzu, M.; Obata, E. Effect of pH on Nitrite Depletion Reaction. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 2009, 35, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xia, C.; Tian, Q.; Kong, L.; Sun, X.; Shi, J.; Zeng, X.; Pan, D. Metabolomics Analysis for Nitrite Degradation by the Metabolites of Limosilactobacillus fermentum RC4. Foods 2022, 11, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Papadimitriou, K.; Alegría, Á.; Bron, P.A.; de Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M.; Kleerebezem, M.; Lemos, J.A.; Linares, D.M.; Ross, P.; Stanton, C.; et al. Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 837–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ye, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, Y. Coordinated Modulation of Energy Metabolism and Inflammation by Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Fatty Acids. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yuan, W.; Piao, J.; Dong, Y. Advancements in the preparation methods of artificial cell membranes with lipids. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 5233–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, N.; Xu, C.; Li-Beisson, Y.; Philippar, K. Fatty acid and lipid transport in plant cells. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Woldemariam, K.Y.; Zhong, S.; Yu, Q.; Wang, J. Antioxidant effect of yeast on lipid oxidation in salami sausage. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1113848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, Y.-Y.; Liu, D.-M.; Jia, X.-Z.; Liang, M.-H.; Lu, Y.; Liu, J. Whole genome sequencing of Lactobacillus plantarum DMDL 9010 and its effect on growth phenotype under nitrite stress. LWT 2021, 149, 111778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poole, K. Stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hanking, B.M.; Roberts, S. Influence of Amino-acid Levels on Protein Synthesis in vitro. Nature 1964, 204, 1194–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jez, J.M. Connecting primary and specialized metabolism: Amino acid conjugation of phytohormones by GRETCHEN HAGEN 3 (GH3) acyl acid amido synthetases. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 66, 102194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kato, T.; Kikugawa, K. Proteins and amino acids as scavengers of nitrite: Inhibitory effect on the formation of nitrosodimethylamine and diazoquinone. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1992, 30, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fu, L.; Zhao, J.; Huang, J.; Li, N.; Dong, X.; He, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Guo, X. A mitochondrial STAT3-methionine metabolism axis promotes ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, 2091–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin, P.; Ren, B.; Wang, X.C.; Jin, X.; Shi, X. Mechanism of microbial metabolic responses and ecological system conversion under different nitrogen conditions in sewers. Water Res. 2020, 186, 116312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zagórski, Z.P.; Sehested, K. Transients and stable radical from the deamination of α-alanine. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1998, 232, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shi, J.; Xia, C.; Tian, Q.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Pan, D. Untargeted metabolomics based on LC–MS to elucidate the mechanism underlying nitrite degradation by Limosilactobacillus fermentum RC4. LWT 2022, 163, 113414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Joshi, V.; Joung, J.-G.; Fei, Z.; Jander, G. Interdependence of threonine, methionine and isoleucine metabolism in plants: Accumulation and transcriptional regulation under abiotic stress. Amino Acids 2010, 39, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deber, C.M.; Stone, T.A. Relative role(s) of leucine versus isoleucine in the folding of membrane proteins. Pept. Sci. 2019, 111, e24075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Miflin, B.J. The Location of Nitrite Reductase and Other Enzymes Related to Amino Acid Biosynthesis in the Plastids of Root and Leaves 1. Plant Physiol. 1974, 54, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Palaiologos, G.; Hertz, L.; Schousboe, A. Role of aspartate aminotransferase and mitochondrial dicarboxylate transport for release of endogenously and exogenously supplied neurotransmitter in glutamatergic neurons. Neurochem. Res. 1989, 14, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Weill-Thévnet, N.J.; Hermann, M.; Vandecasteele, J.-P. Lysine Transport Systems in Pseudomonas in Relation to Their Physiological Function. Microbiology 1979, 111, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xiao, J.; Liu, Q.-Y.; Du, J.-H.; Zhu, W.-L.; Li, Q.-Y.; Chen, X.-L.; Chen, X.-H.; Liu, H.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-Z.; et al. Integrated analysis of physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic responses and tolerance mechanism of nitrite exposure in Litopenaeus vannamei. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tapia, M.I.; Liama, M.J.; Serra, J.L. Active glutamine synthetase is required for ammonium- or glutamine-promoted prevention of nitrate and nitrite reduction in the cyanobacterium Phormidium laminosum. Physiol. Plant 1995, 94, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.M.; Jang, W.J.; Lee, E.-W.; Kong, I.-S. β-glucooligosaccharides derived from barley β-glucan promote growth of lactic acid bacteria and enhance nisin Z secretion by Lactococcus lactis. LWT 2020, 122, 109014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bonestroo, M.H.; Kusters, B.J.M.; de Wit, J.C.; Rombouts, F.M. Glucose and sucrose fermenting capacity of homofermentative lactic acid bacteria used as starters in fermented salads. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992, 15, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xia, G.-H.; Wu, C.-R.; Zhang, M.-Z.; Yang, F.; Chen, C.; Hao, J. The metabolome and bacterial composition of high-moisture Italian ryegrass silage inoculated with lactic acid bacteria during ensiling. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ma, S.; Guo, S.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, Y.; Sheng, S. Enhancement of salt stressed-cucumber tolerance by application of glucose for regulating antioxidant capacity and nitrogen metabolism. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 100, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Z.Y.; Ding, L.L.; Li, J.M.; Xu, B.L.; Yang, L.; Bi, K.S.; Wang, Z.T. ¹H-NMR and MS based metabolomics study of the intervention effect of curcumin on hyperlipidemia mice induced by high-fat diet. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Suram, D.; Thatha, S.; Venkatapuram, P.; Adivireddy, P. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Class of Benzazolyl Pyrazoles. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2017, 54, 3152–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Warnock, D.W. In-vitro resistance to imidazole antifungals in Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1984, 13, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dong, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Huang, G.; Li, S. Recent Advances in the Development of Indazole-based Anticancer Agents. Chemmedchem 2018, 13, 1490–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lee, I.-K.; Kim, S.-E.; Yeom, J.-H.; Ki, D.-W.; Lee, M.-S.; Song, J.-G.; Kim, Y.-S.; Seok, S.-J.; Yun, B.-S. Daldinan A, a novel isoindolinone antioxidant from the ascomycete Daldinia concentrica. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rajur, S.B.; Merwade, A.Y.; Basanagoudar, L.D.; Kulkarni, P.V. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of New Substituted 10-Methyl-1,2-dihydro-1-oxo-1,2,4-triazino(4,5-a)indoles. J. Pharm. Sci. 1989, 78, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Q.; Tu, J.; Yang, W.; Liang, T.; Liu, N.; Sheng, C. Discovery of Pyrazolone Carbothioamide Derivatives as Inhibitors of the Pdr1-KIX Interaction for Combinational Treatment of Azole-Resistant Candidiasis. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 11893–11904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Travis, N.; Kaiqi, S.; Julie, A.R.; Anren, S.; Tatsuro, Y.; Andrew, D.; Matthew, J.W.; Richard, O.F.; Robert, C.R.; Monika, D.; et al. Hypoxia modulates the purine salvage pathway and decreases red blood cell and supernatant levels of hypoxanthine during refrigerated storage. Haematologica 2018, 103, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lewis, E.B.; Chen, E.; Culyba, M.J. DNA cytosine methylation at the lexA promoter of Escherichia coli is stationary phase specific. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 2021, 12, jkab409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Holmsen, H.; Hindenes, J.O.; Fukami, M. Glycerophospholipid metabolism: Back to the future. Thromb. Res. 1992, 67, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lane, A.N.; Fan, T.W.-M. Regulation of mammalian nucleotide metabolism and biosynthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 2466–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Friedkin, M. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism in microorganisms. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1953, 41, 261–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xiang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Ma, M.; Zhao, K.; Yu, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.; Penttinen, P.; Gu, Y. Changes in the taxonomic and functional structures of microbial communities during vegetable waste mixed silage fermentation. Can. J. Microbiol. 2022, 68, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cunin, R.; Glansdorff, N.; Piérard, A.; Stalon, V. Biosynthesis and metabolism of arginine in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1986, 50, 314–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ling, J.; Reynolds, N.; Ibba, M. Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthesis and Translational Quality Control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Miyamoto, T.; Homma, H. D-Amino acid metabolism in bacteria. J. Biochem. 2021, 170, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kobayashi, J. d-Amino Acids and Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Soutourina, J.; Plateau, P.; Blanquet, S. Metabolism of D-aminoacyl-tRNAs in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 32535–32542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Miyazawa, T.; Yokoyama, S. Structures and functions of proteins and nucleic acids in protein biosynthesis. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1989, 8, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Park, S.G.; Kim, S. Do Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have biological functions other than in protein biosynthesis? IUBMB Life 2006, 58, 556–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pan, X.; Chen, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yao, H.; Ma, J. Porcine extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli delivers two serine protease autotransporters coordinately optimizing the bloodstream infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1138801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The growth curve and acid production curve of L. plantarum A50.
Figure 1. The growth curve and acid production curve of L. plantarum A50.
Fermentation 10 00092 g001
Figure 2. Degradation profiles of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 (A); Nitrite degradation profiles at various pH levels (B); Nitrite degradation profiles by metabolites of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth (C); Nitrite degradation profiles by metabolites of L. plantarum A50 under different pH conditions (D).
Figure 2. Degradation profiles of nitrite by L. plantarum A50 (A); Nitrite degradation profiles at various pH levels (B); Nitrite degradation profiles by metabolites of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth (C); Nitrite degradation profiles by metabolites of L. plantarum A50 under different pH conditions (D).
Fermentation 10 00092 g002
Figure 3. The cation (A) and anion (B) OPLS−DA score plot of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth fermented solution.
Figure 3. The cation (A) and anion (B) OPLS−DA score plot of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth fermented solution.
Fermentation 10 00092 g003
Figure 4. Classification diagram of metabolite chemical structures for L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth.
Figure 4. Classification diagram of metabolite chemical structures for L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth.
Fermentation 10 00092 g004
Figure 5. Differential metabolite volcano plot of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth: Cations (A) and Anions (B).
Figure 5. Differential metabolite volcano plot of L. plantarum A50 and MRS broth: Cations (A) and Anions (B).
Fermentation 10 00092 g005
Figure 6. The VIP value plot displaying differential metabolites among Lipids and lipid-like molecules (A), Organic acids and derivatives (B), Organoheterocyclic compounds (C), and Organic oxygen compounds (D).
Figure 6. The VIP value plot displaying differential metabolites among Lipids and lipid-like molecules (A), Organic acids and derivatives (B), Organoheterocyclic compounds (C), and Organic oxygen compounds (D).
Fermentation 10 00092 g006
Figure 7. KEGG enrichment analysis plot (A) and KEGG pathway differential abundance score plot (B). *, 0.01 < p < 0.05; **, 0.001 < p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 7. KEGG enrichment analysis plot (A) and KEGG pathway differential abundance score plot (B). *, 0.01 < p < 0.05; **, 0.001 < p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Fermentation 10 00092 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, J.; Sun, L.; Liu, M.; Dai, R.; Si, Q.; Ge, G.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Y. Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis. Fermentation 2024, 10, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020092

AMA Style

An J, Sun L, Liu M, Dai R, Si Q, Ge G, Wang Z, Jia Y. Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis. Fermentation. 2024; 10(2):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020092

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Jiangbo, Lin Sun, Mingjian Liu, Rui Dai, Qiang Si, Gentu Ge, Zhijun Wang, and Yushan Jia. 2024. "Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis" Fermentation 10, no. 2: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020092

APA Style

An, J., Sun, L., Liu, M., Dai, R., Si, Q., Ge, G., Wang, Z., & Jia, Y. (2024). Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis. Fermentation, 10(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop