Next Article in Journal
Utilization of the Dicarbonyl Compounds 3-Deoxyglucosone and 3-Deoxymaltosone during Beer Fermentation by Saccharomyces Yeasts
Previous Article in Journal
Bioprospecting and Selection of Indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeasts from Pozo de Los Algarrobos (Argentina) for the Production of Genuine White Wines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Activity of Cannabidiol on Ex Vivo Amino Acid Fermentation by Bovine Rumen Microbiota
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Gas Production of Common Southeast Asian Grasses in Response to Variable Regrowth Periods in Vietnam

by
Huyen Thi Duong Nguyen
1,2,
Jan Thomas Schonewille
3,*,
Wilbert Frans Pellikaan
1,
Trach Xuan Nguyen
2 and
Wouter Hendrikus Hendriks
1,3
1
Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Trau Quy, Gia Lam, Hanoi 12406, Vietnam
3
Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80163, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(6), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10060280
Submission received: 9 April 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 11 May 2024 / Published: 25 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vitro Digestibility and Ruminal Fermentation Profile, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
The relationship between DM yield/cutting and the fermentable organic matter (FOM) content of tropical grasses was appropriately investigated to re-assess optimal grass maturity to feed dairy cattle. Nine different grass species belonging to the genera Brachiaria spp. (Mulato II, Ruzi), Panicum spp. (Guinea, Hamil, Mombasa, TD58), and Pennisetum spp. (King, Napier, VA06) were chemically analysed and subjected to an in vitro gas production (IVGP) test. For 72 h, gas production (GP) was continuously recorded with fully automated equipment. A triphasic, nonlinear, regression procedure was applied to analyse GP profiles. Across all the grasses, it was found that the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) contents increased with increasing maturity of the grass while the CP contents decreased with increasing NDF contents. In all nine grasses, digestible organic matter (dOM) was significantly affected by the week of cutting but IVGP was similar between the weeks of cutting in Ruzi, Hamil, Mombasa, and Napier grasses. Except for Guinea grass, the lowest dOM values were found when the grasses were cut after ≥5 weeks of regrowth. Harvesting grass one or two weeks earlier than the normal cutting time is a practically relevant intervention in increasing forage quality and productivity of dOM and fermentation potential.

1. Introduction

Dairy cows in Southeast (SE) Asian countries such as Thailand and Vietnam typically produce 4000–4500 kg of milk per lactation cycle with an average fat content below 4% [1,2,3]. In view of the low level of milk production compared to cows in temperate climates, the observed low milk fat content can be considered unexpected. It is generally accepted that the relatively low milk yield is not caused by genetics, given that the dairy cows are typically crossbreds, predominantly Holstein Friesian (>87.5%) and local breeds [4]. Thus, it is reasonable to infer that environmental factors and management practices, such as nutrition, predominantly influence milk production rather than genetics [2,5]. Acetic acid (Hac) and ß-hydroxybutyric acid (Hbu) are important precursors of fatty acid synthesis in the mammary glands of dairy cows [6]. It can, therefore, be suggested that the supply of Hac and Hbu to the mammary glands of Thai and Vietnamese dairy cows is insufficient. It is well known that the aforementioned precursors of milk fat originate predominantly from organic matter that is fermented in the rumen [7]. It thus would appear that the rations typically fed in Thailand and Vietnam contain insufficient fermentable organic matter (FOM) to yield Hac and Hbu to ensure milk fat synthesis.
Fresh grasses are mainly used to compose dairy rations in SE Asian countries. According to custom, Thai and Vietnamese farmers practice cutting intervals of 6 to 9 weeks, depending on the grass species in question, i.e., typically grasses that belong to the genera Pennisetum, Panicum, and Brachiaria. Cutting intervals of 6 to 9 weeks result in high dry matter (DM) yields per cutting but the harvested grasses are physiologically mature and, therefore, very fibrous and low in crude protein (CP). Furthermore, Huyen et al. [8] recently reported that, across the three aforementioned genera of grasses, in vitro gas production [9,10] was, on average, only ~9% greater compared to that of rice straw, thereby indicating that the FOM content of tropical grasses is relatively low when they are harvested under practical farming conditions. In temperate grasses, such as Lolium perenne, it is well established that a prolonged cutting interval is negatively associated with the FOM content of the grass [11]. In tropical grasses, however, the relationship between DM yield/cutting and FOM content is poorly understood due to a dearth of studies addressing this association. As such, whether the relationship between cutting interval/maturity of fresh grass and rumen digestibility, as found in temperate grasses, holds true for tropical grasses is still unknown. Therefore, the objective of the current research was to provide novel information on the relationship between the cutting intervals of common Southeast Asian grasses and rumen degradation. To achieve this, we conducted an in vitro study using cumulative gas production and organic matter (OM) degradability as primary indicators of the FOM content of tropical grasses. We hypothesized that a shorter regrowth period of tropical grasses commonly used for dairy rations in SE Asia would result in increased fermentability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Grass Collection

Nine different grass species (Mulato II (Brachiaria ruziziensis × Brachiaria decumbens × Brachiaria brizantha); Ruzi (Brachiaria ruziziensis); Guinea (Megathyrsus maximus (Jacq.) B. K. Simon & S. W. L. Jacobs, formerly named Panicum maximum Jacq.); Hamil (Panicum maximum cv. Hamill); Mombasa (Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa); TD58 (Panicum maximum cv.TD58); King (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum glaucum); Napier (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.); and VA06 (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum)) were harvested at up to nine different weekly regrowth ages from June to August 2018 at the Animal Husbandry Research and Development Centre for Mountainous Zone (ARDC), Song Cong town, Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. The centre is located at 21°29′14″ N 105°48′47″ E and experiences an annual rainfall of 2168 mm with an average temperature of 23 °C. The plot area used for each grass variety was 400 m2. An initial fertilizer dressing of N:P:K with 160:80:80 kg/ha/yr was applied at sowing, with further annual applications at the same rate. Annually, an amount of 20 tons/ha/yr of cattle manure was applied manually. The cattle manure used was not chemically analysed, but typically manure from Vietnamese dairy cattle contains N:P:K with a ratio of 4.0:1.9:1.6 [12].
Chemical analyses and gas production were carried out on grasses at four cutting time points, excluding Napier and VA06 grasses of Pennisetum spp. and Guinea and TD58 grasses of Panicum spp. The selection of these time points was based on practical harvest times in Vietnam, including two time points before practical cutting, one during practical cutting, and one for late cutting. As it is unknown whether normal practical cutting provides precise nutritive information for determining the suitable cutting age, two grasses from each of the two most commonly used genera, based on the advice of recognized experts in ruminant nutrition, were selected for additional evaluation. These selections ranged from week 1 to 9 for Pennisetum spp. and from week 1 to week 6 for Panicum spp.
At each grass plot, a 10 m × 10 m area was marked out for sampling, and by walking in a ‘W’ pattern, 20 evenly spaced cores were manually collected using a sickle. The grass was harvested, leaving around 10 cm of stubble above ground level. After harvesting, each selected species and harvesting time grass sample was manually cut to 3 cm and mixed thoroughly before collecting a 5 kg representative sample which was divided equally into two bags (one for analysis and one for reserve) and stored at −20 °C in Vietnam. Subsequently, all the frozen grass samples were transported to Wageningen University & Research (Wageningen, The Netherlands), maintaining −20 °C conditions, for analyses.

2.2. Chemical Analyses

Upon arrival at Wageningen, the frozen fresh grass samples were thawed and dried for 16 h at 70 °C before being ground (1 mm screen) using a cross beater mill (Peppink 100 AN, Deventer, The Netherlands) and analysed in duplicate for DM, crude ash. The OM content was calculated as the difference between DM and ash contents. Ether extract (EE) was determined by the Soxhlet method with petroleum ether as a solvent following AOAC [13] method no. 963.15. Crude protein was calculated from nitrogen (N × 6.25) obtained via the Kjeldahl method [14]. The neutral detergent fibre (NDF; with heat stable α-amylase) content was analysed according to Van Soest et al. [15] while acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were determined according to Van Soest [16].

2.3. In Vitro Gas and CH4 Production

Cumulative in vitro gas (IVGP) and methane (CH4) production over 72 h were measured in a fully automated gas production system [9]. Each ground and dried grass (~0.5 g) was accurately weighed in quadruplicate 250 mL fermentation bottles (Schott, Mainz, Germany). Duplicate bottles were randomly distributed across three runs. Blank bottles (rumen fluid without grass) were used in triplicate for each run. The two non-lactating Holstein-Friesian rumen fluid donor cows were fed grass silage (NEL, 4.37 MJ/kg DM; CP, 99 g/kg DM; NDF, 675 g/kg DM) ad libitum and had free access to water. Approximately 350 mL of rumen fluid was collected from each cow using a tube inserted via the oesophagus before the morning feeding at the research farm of Wageningen University, The Netherlands. Subsequently, the rumen fluid was pooled and filtered through cheesecloth and subsequently mixed (1:2 v/v) with an anaerobic buffer/mineral solution [15] under continuous flushing with CO2. Prior to inoculation, the fermentation bottles were placed in a shaking water bath kept at 39 °C and pre-flushed with CO2. Sixty mL of buffered rumen fluid was added to the bottle before being connected to fully automated gas recording equipment for 72 h. After this time, the bottles were disconnected and placed on ice and 0.6 mL of the solution was pipetted into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, and 0.6 mL of an internal standard solution (isocapronic acid) was added before vigorous mixing. After 5 min of centrifugation at 14,000× g, a 0.75 mL sample of the supernatant was taken and mixed with an equal volume (1:1, v/v) of a stock solution composed of 25 mL of 85% (v/v) ortho-phosphoric acid dissolved in 200 mL Millipore water (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 300 mL of a 4 g/L 4-methylvaleric acid (internal standard) for volatile fatty acids (VFA) analysis. The mixture was then stored at −20 °C pending analysis. VFA were analysed using a gas chromatograph (Trace GC Ultra, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) equipped with a flame ionization detector and an Agilent HP-FFAP column (Agilent Tech., Santa Clara, CA, USA; 30 m length, 0.53 mm i.d., 1 µm film) using hydrogen as carrier gas (25 kPa, constant pressure). Isocaproic acid was used as an internal standard.
After 72 h of incubation, fermentation fluids from sample bottles were filtered in respective crucibles (P2 standard with pore size 40–100 µm, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark) with a filter plate of sintered glass and 0.5 cm washed and incinerated sea sand (VWR, art. no. 1.07711.5000). Before using the crucibles, they were washed with hot water and dried at 103 °C for 1 h, then ashed at 530 °C for 1 h and finally placed in a desiccator for 1 h to cool down before weighing with an analytical balance of 0.1 mg precision. The crucibles containing fermentation fluids were then vacuum drained and washed with hot distilled water by a cold extraction unit (FT 121 Fibertec™, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark) to remove microbial matter from the undegraded substrates, and then dried at 103 °C for 4 h and ashed at 530 °C for 2 h. The difference between these two values was termed residual OM. The degraded OM (OMd) was calculated as the difference between incubated and residual OM after 72 h of fermentation.
Precisely 10 μL of the headspace gas was collected from each fermentation bottle and directly injected into a gas chromatograph to determine headspace CH4 production at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h, as described by Pellikaan et al. [10,17]. Briefly, measured CH4 production in individual bottles was expressed relative to the maximum production in each bottle and was fitted iteratively with a monophasic model. Methane production at each individual valve opening was then calculated, and cumulative CH4 was determined as the sum of the increase in headspace CH4 production between two successive valve openings, and the amount of CH4 vented from the bottle.

2.4. Curve Fitting and Calculations

Gas and CH4 production from all samples were corrected for the corresponding production by blank bottles at each time point [9,10]. Before curve fitting, the cumulative gas production curves of quadruplicate bottles per sample were visually inspected and coefficients of variation (CV) were determined for values at 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. If the CV > 10%, the gas production curves were evaluated for outlier replicate bottles. The non-linear least squares regression procedure was used [18] and the data were fitted according to the following equation, as outlined by Groot et al. [19]:
G P = i n A i 1 + ( C i t ) B i
where GP (mL/g OM) is the cumulative produced gas or CH4; n = total number of phases; i = number of phases; Ai (mL/g OM) is estimated asymptotic gas or CH4 production in phase i; Bi is a constant determining the switching characteristic of the curve in phase i; Ci (h) is the time at which half of the asymptotic gas or CH4 production was reached in phase i; and t (h) is the time of incubation.
A tri-phasic model (n = 3) was fitted to the cumulative gas production following the procedure as described by Groot et al. [19], where phases 1 and 2 are assumed to relate to the fermentation of the soluble and non-soluble fraction, respectively, and phase 3 is assumed to be related to microbial turnover. The time windows related to the asymptotes of GP for phases 1, 2, and 3 (A1, A2, and A3, respectively) were pre-set from 0 to 3, 3 to 20, and 20 to 72 h after the start of incubation of the substrate, respectively, to enable the estimation of the various parameters (Bi and Ci, respectively). The aforementioned time points were empirically determined by Van Gelder et al. [20] based on the work of Cone et al. [21]. Data on CH4 production were also fitted according to the above-mentioned model where n = 1.

2.5. Calculations and Statistical Analyses

The total VFA in fermentation fluid at 72 h was calculated as the sum of Hac, propionic acid (Hpr), butyric acid (Hbu), valeric acid (Hva), isobutyric acid (iso-Hbu), and isovaleric acid (iso-Hva). The branched-chain volatile fatty acids (BCVFA) in fermentation fluid were calculated as the sum of iso-Hbu and iso-Hva. The non-glucogenic to glucogenic ratio (NGR) was calculated as described by Ørskov [22]:
[acetate + 2 × (Hbu + isoHbu) + Hva + iso-Hva]/[Hpr + Hva + iso-Hva].
The most commonly used grass in Vietnam for each genus (Mombasa, Mulato II, and King grass) was selected to calculate the estimated yield of FOM indicators as an example. Normal practical cutting was considered as 100% of in vitro digestible OM (dOM) and fermentation potential (GP, A1 + A2) yield, whereafter the percentage of other cutting yields was calculated. For Mombasa and Mulato II grass, biomass yield equations (kg DM/ha/yr) were derived from data reported by Hare et al. [23,24], respectively, after the conversion of biomass yields per year:
YMo = 0.1120x2 + 52.080x (0 ≤ x ≤ 90; R2 = 0.95)
YMu = 0.7423x2 + 34.672x (0 ≤ x ≤ 90; R2 = 0.99)
For King grass, biomass yield (kg dry matter/ha/yr) was determined using the equation provided by Sales et al. [25]:
YKi = −1.2426x2 + 282.64x (0 ≤ x ≤ 120)
where YMo, YMu, and YKi are the estimated yield of Mombasa, Mulato II, and King grass, respectively; x is cutting time in days after regrowth.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between predicted (i.e., GP, TVFA, etc.) and predicting (i.e., cutting ages, chemical components, etc.) variables were determined if data were normally distributed as tested using Kolmogorov–Smirnov. If data were not normally distributed, Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used. Effects of regrowth age within each grass were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the PROC MIXED procedure [18] using the following model:
Yij = μ + Hi + Rj + eij
where Yij = response variable (i.e., GP-72, CH4-72 production, fermentation kinetics parameters), μ is the overall mean, Hi is the effect of harvest time (i = 1 to 9 regrowth week), Rj is the random effect of run j (j = 1 to 3), and eij is the residual error term. Differences among harvest times within each grass were determined using the least square means procedure and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. Studentized residuals were checked for normal distribution. Residuals were checked per grass species (n = 9) with Kolmogorov–Smirnov. All response variables for all grasses were found to be normally distributed except for the BCVFA of Mombasa grass. Therefore, the data of BCVFA were transformed and normality was achieved by applying a square transformation. Throughout, the level of statistical significance was pre-set at p < 0.05 while a trend was declared at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition of Tropical Grasses at Different Regrowth Ages

The OM content of the grasses and advanced cutting age (Table 1) showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.56, p < 0.001, n = 49). Those belonging to the Pennisetum genus (especially King and VA06) generally showed a stronger correlation of OM content with cutting age (r = 0.83, p < 0.001, n = 21). This trend is consistent with the findings of Mutimura et al. [26] who reported that the OM content of Napier grass increased until 90 d after planting and then declined. The increase in OM might be attributed to the fact that grass is still in the development stage, during which OM accumulates relative to the inorganic matter.
The values related to cell wall constituents (NDF, ADF, and ADL) increased with the advancement of grass maturity (r = 0.56, 0.60, 0.61, and p < 0.001, respectively). The current data were found to be in line with other previous reports [27,28]. Tropical grasses develop thick-walled cells with increased cell wall fractions, including cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, as a structural adaptation to minimize photorespiration, enhancing overall resilience to tropical environmental conditions, that helps contribute to the plant’s robustness owing to both the thickness and composition of cell walls [29]. Consequently, the NDF content of tropical grasses is higher than temperate grasses (60–75 vs. 35–67% DM) [30,31,32].
In the present study, an increase in the cell wall constituents of tropical grasses (for instance, NDF) was associated with a decrease in CP content with advancing cutting ages, and this decrease was even more pronounced at later stages (r = −0.75, p < 0.001), which is consistent with observations of others in temperate grasses [33,34,35]. A notable example is the CP content of VA06, which significantly decreased from approximately 30 to 7.4% in the DM between the first and eighth week. Despite the decline in CP content with advancing grass maturity, the final CP content still exceeded the minimum CP level (7%) required for rumen function [36], although the CP content in rations recommended by the NRC [37] for lactating cows ranges from 14 to 18% DM.
The lipid content (EE) of the selected grasses ranged from 1.9 to 3.2% DM, which is comparable to the values reported by Melesse et al. [38] for tropical grasses (1.1–3.1% DM). The EE of the Brachiaria genus in the current study correlated well with increasing maturity age (r = −0.77, p = 0.02, n = 8). The other grasses showed a trend of an increase in EE content from the early to the middle stage and then a decline from the middle to the late stage of maturity.
In general, the reduction in cell contents, in particular CP content, was countered by the accumulation of structural carbohydrates as the grass matured.

3.2. In Vitro Gas and CH4 Production Parameters of Grasses Belonging to the Brachiaria Genus

As shown in Table 2, the in vitro dOM, cumulative CH4 production measured after 72 h of incubation, and branched-chain volatile fatty acids (BCVFA) of Mulato II grass were significantly influenced by harvesting time. The highest numerical values of this grass were found at week 4 in all parameters (except for BCVFA), which is earlier than the commonly used cutting time (week 6) under practical farming conditions in Vietnam. Nevertheless, the highest quantity of cumulative CH4 production measured after 72 h of incubation (CH4-72) observed at week 4 may raise environmental concerns, whereas the CH4 percentage (CH4:GP-72) was not different between cutting weeks. This is unexpected due to the low content of fibre at week 4 compared to the other weeks. These findings contrast with Neto et al. [39] and Ruggieri et al. [40] who reported that forages rich in structural carbohydrates tend to yield greater amounts of CH4 and a decreased digestibility compared to forages higher in non-structural carbohydrates. It is well known that high levels of non-fibre carbohydrates in the diet stimulate rumen Hpr production, which subsequently reduces CH4 synthesis by the methanogens [41,42]. In Ruzi grass, total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) was highest when cut at week 4, whilst other parameters were not affected by grass maturity. Cutting grass at a later stage (i.e., after week 6) should not be beneficial in terms of fermentable organic matter (FOM) content.
Overall, due to the high fermentation potential values (i.e., dOM, A1 + A2 and TVFA) and high values of volatile fatty acids used for milk fat synthesis (i.e., BCVFA), the recommended harvest age for grasses belonging to the Brachiaria genus appears to be at week 4 after the previous cut.

3.3. In Vitro Gas and CH4 Production Parameters of Grasses Belonging to the Panicum Genus

The variation in in vitro gas and CH4 production parameters of grasses belonging to the Panicum genus was found to be large (Table 3). In Guinea grass, cutting at the first three weeks of regrowth had more advantages (except for CH4 production) than late cuttings. Normal practical cutting (week 5) resulted in higher values of in vitro dOM, GP-72, and A1 + A2 production compared to cutting one week earlier. Week 4 had the lowest values over almost all parameters. These discrepancies are not easy to explain but it can be speculated that the variation in those parameters does not properly reflect the FOM content. Cumulative CH4-72, expressed in both terms (g/kg OM and proportion) was not systematically affected by harvest time, with week 4 having the least amount of CH4 being different to the other weeks. This is due to the lowest value of fibre content at week 4 compared to other weeks. The relationship between structural carbohydrates and CH4 production was mentioned in the previous section.
For Hamil grass, dOM gradually declined (p < 0.001) with grass maturity whilst GP and A1 + A2 did not differ among weeks, although a numerical decrease was observed. A1 + A2 values were different between weeks 2 and 6 with no difference in CH4-72 or CH4:GP-72 values. Cutting at the normal practical cutting time (week 5) did not differ from the other weeks, except for dOM and BCVFA. Under the assumption that NGR and A:P are the indicators related to milk fat synthesis, cutting at any given week between 2 and 6 produced similar results. Week 2 had the highest dOM, TVFA, and BCVFA values, making it the most suitable harvest time for Hamil grass without concerns about increased CH4 production.
For Mombasa grass, except for BCVFA, expressed as a percentage of TVFA, which had high values at either week 2 or week 4, all other parameters did not vary with cutting age.
For TD58 grass, significant effects of cutting time were observed for dOM, CH4-72, BCVFA, NGR, and A:P. The lowest values were observed in either week 2 or 3 for dOM, BCVFA, NGR, and A:P corresponding to the high NDF content at these two weeks. GP, A1 + A2, CH4 proportion, and TVFA were similar throughout the harvesting ages. The NGR and A:P ratio had the highest value at week 1 but were similar from weeks 2 to 6. It should be noted that cutting every week would produce the biomass with the highest FOM.
In the present study, the NDF content of these four grasses was found to be negatively correlated with dOM and BCVFA concentrations (r = −0.66, −0.89; p = 0.003, <0.001, respectively). In general, it appears that harvesting grasses belonging to the Panicum genus before two weeks of regrowth provides the highest concentration of FOM biomass and, therefore, can be expected to yield the greatest milk fat content by dairy cows in Vietnam.

3.4. In Vitro Gas and CH4 Production Parameters of Grasses Belonging to the Pennisetum Genus

As seen in Table 4, grasses belonging to the Pennisetum genus generally displayed a wide variation in their in vitro GP and CH4 emission potentials.
King grass exhibited a gradual decrease (p < 0.001) in dOM with advancing grass maturity similar to the other grasses. This decrease is due to plant growth and development, where over time grasses contain more fibrous materials such as cellulose and lignin, which are more challenging to digest and require more fermentation for breakdown. It is worth noting that frequent cuttings at 5 weeks of regrowth are the most suitable in view of King grass’s chemical composition. Both normal practical and late cutting resulted in a reduction in NGR and A:P compared to very early cutting (week 3) which had relatively low GP and A1 + A2 values. Generally, forages rich in structural carbohydrates tend to result in greater CH4 emissions; however, the result of King grass exhibited the opposite trend.
For Napier grass, it is noteworthy that no significant differences were found in fermentation potential values (i.e., dOM, GP-72, A1 + A2, and TVFA) across cutting weeks. Increased grass maturity led to a decline in BCVFA, NGR, and A:P ratios. Cutting Napier grass before 6 weeks of regrowth appears optimal in terms of fermentability and generation of precursors for milk fat synthesis.
Cutting VA06 grass at a very early stage (i.e., in the first week) resulted in the lowest values of GP, A1 + A2 and TVFA, and produced the highest values of BCVFA, NGR, and A:P ratios. The highest values for degradable organic matter and fermentability were observed for normal practical cutting of this grass (week 5), but precursors for milk fat synthesis were less favourable. Overall, considering all parameters, week 4 appears to be the most suitable cutting time for VA06.
Meanwhile, the CP content of those grasses belonging to the Pennisetum genus was found to be positively correlated with BCVFA (r = 0.81 and p < 0.001). This finding aligns with the studies by Bowen et al. [43] and Musco et al. [44], who reported that grasses with lower protein levels (compared to other feedstuffs) led to lower ammonia-N and branched-chain fatty acid concentrations because these acids are derived from the degradation of some amino acids (i.e., valine, proline, isoleucine, and leucine).
Overall, the data of grasses belonging to the Pennisetum genus indicate that they are best harvested at either week 4 or 5 in terms of digestibility and fermentability.

3.5. Relative Yield (%) of FOM Indices of Three Grasses

To affect milk fat content, the FOM content of the grasses is important but cutting earlier or later than the common practice will affect biomass yield and, as a result, the total amount of FOM produced. Data on biomass yield in relation to the cutting time of Mombasa [23], Mulato II [24], and King grass [25] were used to calculate the relative yields of DM, dOM, GP, and A1 + A2, and the results were compared with those calculated for the current practical cutting time. As can be seen in Table 5, the yield of DM biomass of Mombasa increased with cutting age, while the total amount of dOM was lower for both early and late cutting compared to the normal cutting time at week 5. However, cutting at 4 weeks of regrowth produced on average 20% additional relative yield of fermentation potential (GP and A1 + A2) than week 5. The relative biomass yields of Mulato II gradually increased with increasing maturity across all parameters. Mulato II cut at 8-week intervals compared to the normal cutting interval of 6 weeks showed an average increase of ~13.3% in relative yields of in vitro dOM and fermentation potential (GP and A1 + A2). The decrease in the DM biomass of King grass when cutting age advances might be attributed to the fact that this grass is still in the developmental stage, during which OM accumulates relative to the inorganic matter (Table 1). The effect of King grass maturity on all parameters was more pronounced in week 5 than in week 7 with, on average, around a 9% increase. The total biomass yield of dOM of King grass showed a gradual decline with delayed harvesting times. However, cutting grass at week 3 might not be a good harvesting strategy due to lower values of relative yields of GP and A1 + A2 compared with cutting at week 5.
Overall, the implementation of a well-timed grass-cutting strategy depends on selecting the appropriate parameter to enhance milk fat content while also balancing the demand for a large quantity of low-quality feed against the need for smaller amounts of higher-quality feed.

4. Conclusions

Harvesting tropical grasses one or two weeks earlier than normally practised is a practically relevant intervention for increasing forage quality and productivity of dOM and fermentation potential, thereby proving our hypothesis. The methane proportion was not significantly affected by grass maturity (except for Ruzi and Guinea). Even within the same genus, grasses still exhibit different patterns of in vitro gas and CH4 production. These results provide important insights into the potential use of fermentable organic matter indicators of tropical grasses in combination with improvements in nutritive value to meet dairy nutrition requirements.

Author Contributions

This chapter was a collaborative effort, and each author contributed to the design of the study. T.X.N. contributed to the design of grass fields and the collection of fresh grasses in Vietnam. W.F.P. assisted with in vitro methodology, data analysis, and interpretation. H.T.D.N. formulated the study, carried out the research, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. J.T.S. and W.H.H. reviewed and provided critical feedback on the manuscript and approved the version to be published. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Eurofins (Wageningen), De Heus (Ede) as well as Wageningen University & Research (Wageningen), The Netherlands. The authors also would like to acknowledge the scholarship provided by the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (the funding number is 5859/QĐ-BGDĐT).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors also thank Saskia van Laar-van Schuppen, Xuan Huong van der Schans-Le, and Michel Breuer for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nguyen, T.; Phan, T.; Tran, P.; Tran, T. The factors affecting milk production of dairy cows in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1155, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hieu, V.N.; Lambertz, C.; Gauly, M. Factors influencing milk yield, quality and revenue of dairy farms in Southern Vietnam. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 10, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wongpom, B.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Elzo, M.A.; Suwanasopee, T. Milk yield, fat yield and fat percentage associations in a Thai multibreed dairy population. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2017, 51, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boonkum, W.; Misztal, I.; Duangjinda, M.; Pattarajinda, V.; Tumwasorn, S.; Sanpote, J. Genetic effects of heat stress on milk yield of Thai Holstein crossbreds. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ashes, J.R.; Gulati, S.K.; Scott, T.W. Potential to alter the content and composition of milk fat through nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 2204–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tyznik, W.J. The Effect of the Amount and Physical State of the Roughage upon the Rumen Fatty Acids and Milk Fat of Dairy Cows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, 1951; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shabi, Z.; Arieli, A.; Bruckental, I.; Aharoni, Y.; Zamwel, S.; Bor, A.; Tagari, H. Effect of the synchronization of the degradation of dietary crude protein and organic matter and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation and flow of digesta in the abomasum of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1991–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huyen, T.D.N.; Schonewille, J.T.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Nguyen, X.T.; Hendriks, W.H. In vitro gas and methane production of some common feedstuffs used for dairy rations in Vietnam and Thailand. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 37, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cone, J.W.; van Gelder, A.H.; Visscher, G.J.W.; Oudshoorn, L. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 61, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pellikaan, W.F.; Hendriks, W.H.; Uwimana, G.; Bongers, L.J.G.M.; Becker, P.M.; Cone, J. A novel method to determine simultaneously methane production during in vitro gas production using fully automated equipment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 168, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Macome, F.M.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Hendriks, W.H.; Warner, D.; Schonewille, J.T.; Cone, J.W. In vitro gas and methane production in rumen fluid from dairy cows fed grass silages differing in plant maturity, compared to in vivo data. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ha, N.T.T. Improved Manure Management in Vietnam. 2015. Available online: https://www.ccacoalition.org/sites/default/files/resources/161019_Training_Improved-Manure-Management-Vietnam_EN.pdf (accessed on 8 April 2024).
  13. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  14. NEN-ISO 5983-2; Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Nitrogen Content and Calculation of Crude Protein Content—Part 2: Block Digestion and Steam Distillation Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  15. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Van Soest, P.J. Collaborative study of acid detergent fibre and lignin. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1970, 56, 781–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pellikaan, W.F.; Stringano, E.; Leenaars, J.; Bongers, D.J.G.M.; van Laar-van Schuppen, S.; Plant, J.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Evaluating effects of tannins on extent and rate of in vitro gas and CH4 production using an automated pressure evaluation system (APES). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166–167, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. SAS Institute. User’s Guide: Statistics Version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc SAS Release 9.4: Cary, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Groot, J.C.J.; Cone, J.W.; Williams, B.A.; Debersaques, F.M.A.; Lantinga, E.A. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 64, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Van Gelder, A.H.; Hetta, M.; Rodrigues, M.A.M.; De Boever, J.L.; Den Hartigh, H.; Rymer, C.; van Oostrum, M.; van Kaathoven, R.; Cone, J.W. Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: Results of a ring test. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 123–124, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cone, J.W.; van Gelder, A.H.; Driehuis, F. Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1997, 66, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ørskov, E. Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum food utilization. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 1975, 22, 152–182. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hare, M.; Phengphet, S.; Songsiri, T.; Sutin, N.; Stern, E. Effect of cutting interval on yield and quality of three Brachiaria hybrids in Thailand. Trop. Grassl. 2013, 1, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hare, M.; Phengphet, S.; Songsiri, T.; Sutin, N.; Stern, E. Effect of cutting interval on yield and quality of two Panicum maximum cultivars in Thailand. Trop. Grassl. 2013, 1, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sales, F.A.; Caramori, P.H.; Ricce, W.d.S.; Costa, M.A.M.S.; Zaro, G.C. Biomass of elephant grass and leucaena for bioenergy production. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2015, 36, 3567–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mutimura, M.; Ebong, C.; Rao, I.; Nsahlai, I. Effect of cutting time on agronomic and nutritional characteristics of nine commercial cultivars of Brachiaria grass compared with Napier grass during establishment under semi-arid conditions in Rwanda. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 2692–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ansah, T.; Osafo, E.L.K.; Hansen, H.H. Herbage yield and chemical composition of four varieties of Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass harvested at three different days after planting. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2010, 1, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zailan, M.Z.; Yaakub, H.; Jusoh, S. Yield and nutritive value of four Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different harvesting ages. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2016, 7, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barbehenn, R.V.; Chen, Z.; Karowe, D.N.; Spickard, A. C3 grasses have higher nutritional quality than C4 grasses under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elizalde, J.C.; Merchen, N.R.; Faulkner, D.B. In situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of fresh forages during the spring growth. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 1978–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lopes, J.C. Nutrient Composition and Fiber Digestibility Measurements of Tropical Forages Collected from Intensively Managed Rotational Grazing Systems. Master’s Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ortega-Gómez, R.; Castillo-Gallegos, E.; Rodríguez, J.; Escobar-Hernández, R.; Ocaña-Zavaleta, E.; Valles, B. Nutritive quality of ten grasses during the rainy season in a hot-humid climate and ultisol soil. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 2011, 13, 481–491. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cone, J.W.; van Gelder, A.H. Influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1999, 76, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Man, N.; Wiktorsson, H. Forage yield, nutritive value, feed intake and digestibility of three grass species as affected by harvest frequency. Trop. Grassl. 2003, 37, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chaves, A.V.; Waghorn, G.C.; Brookes, I.M.; Woodfield, D.R. Effect of maturation and initial harvest dates on the nutritive characteristics of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 127, 293–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Teklehaimanot, H.S.; Tritschler, J.P. Evaluation of spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus-indicus) as an alternative feed and water source for animals during dry season in Eritrea. In Sustainable Agricultural Development: Recent Approaches in Resources Management and Environmentally-Balanced Production Enhancement; Behnassi, M., Shahid, S.A., D’Silva, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 245–252. [Google Scholar]
  37. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th ed.; National Research Council, National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; p. 408. [Google Scholar]
  38. Melesse, A.; Steingass, H.; Schollenberger, M.; Rodehutscord, M. Screening of common tropical grass and legume forages in Ethiopia for their nutrient composition and methane production profile in vitro. Trop. Grassl. 2017, 5, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Neto, A.J.; Messana, J.D.; Granja-Salcedo, Y.T.; Castagnino, P.S.; Fiorentini, G.; Reis, R.A.; Berchielli, T.T. Effect of starch level in supplement with or without oil source on diet and apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial population of Nellore steers grazing tropical grass. Livest. Sci. 2017, 202, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ruggieri, A.C.; Cardoso, A.d.S.; Ongaratto, F.; Casagrande, D.R.; Barbero, R.P.; Brito, L.d.F.; Azenha, M.V.; Oliveira, A.A.; Koscheck, J.F.W.; Reis, R.A. Grazing intensity impacts on herbage mass, sward structure, greenhouse gas emissions, and animal performance: Analysis of Brachiaria pastureland. Agron. J. 2020, 10, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McAllister, T.A.; Newbold, C.J. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. van Lingen, H.J.; Niu, M.; Kebreab, E.; Valadares Filho, S.C.; Rooke, J.A.; Duthie, C.-A.; Schwarm, A.; Kreuzer, M.; Hynd, P.I.; Caetano, M.; et al. Prediction of enteric methane production, yield and intensity of beef cattle using an intercontinental database. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 283, 106575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bowen, M.K.; Poppi, D.P.; McLennan, S.R. Ruminal protein degradability of a range of tropical pastures. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Musco, N.; Koura, I.B.; Tudisco, R.; Awadjihè, G.; Adjolohoun, S.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Mollica, M.P.; Houinato, M.; Infascelli, F.; Calabrò, S. Nutritional characteristics of forage grown in south of Benin. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/kg dry matter) of nine common Southeast Asian grasses at different stages of maturity.
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/kg dry matter) of nine common Southeast Asian grasses at different stages of maturity.
GrassWeekOMCPEENDFADFADLGrassWeekOMCPEENDFADFADL
Mulato II285122628.851925520.3TD58487313824.564431018.1
484614725.749823419.3585514827.567636221.2
685811319.260731624.5686316524.366735016.9
886011818.165636230.9King385918124.859833617.2
Ruzi288917932.253626821.5586913633.460233619.4
487816325.750523421.478968727.964637723.6
691511624.566035426.7992010323.765940947.3
888816225.662232829.8Napier288116130.962033121.3
Guinea186422624.460032721.2385916526.758131622.5
288221828.759931320.2487918425.953827020.5
391217526.565734926.5587117628.956931023.6
487718026.367737531.6685816729.059431827.9
587014331.765936630.6788214028.064635328.0
687613728.567537330.6889011724.767036223.6
Hamil284425429.757229314.9991113218.769639733.1
48769723.373241327.5VA06182429828.849127621.4
584596--410-281122323.654128730.0
684085--409-386725623.756030419.4
Mombasa287117125.564135020.2485115625.859332422.5
486012428.666936520.1587213926.864635425.8
587611426.569637519.0689210226.868239532.1
68849023.473040624.479138824.769439535.5
TD58182722622.356527019.189027420.471743651.5
285710728.667336422.299028923.670641144.0
387513228.668837220.1
ADF = acid detergent fibre, ADL = acid detergent lignin, CP = crude protein, EE = ether extract, NDF = neutral detergent fibre, OM = organic matter, - = not determined.
Table 2. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility (dOM), gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of two grasses (Mulato II and Ruzi) belonging to the Brachiaria genus grown between 2 and 8 weeks.
Table 2. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility (dOM), gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of two grasses (Mulato II and Ruzi) belonging to the Brachiaria genus grown between 2 and 8 weeks.
GrassWeekdOMGP-72A1 + A2CH4-72CH4:GP-72TVFABCVFANGRA:P
g/kg OMmL/g OM% of GP-72mM% of TVFAmol/mol
Mulato II2781 ab25919944.5 b17.275.43.15 a3.332.80
Mulato II4791 a27521849.5 a18.177.72.86 ab3.503.04
Mulato II6 *724 b24618341.4 c17.071.42.58 b3.382.76
Mulato II8726 b23418039.7 d17.175.92.60 b3.402.81
Pooled SE 6.369.7010.81.841.001.890.090.130.19
p value 0.0310.1000.091<0.0010.5100.0650.0350.8110.150
Ruzi 2775267222 x46.117.479.7 ab3.083.453.01
Ruzi 4794272216 x47.817.880.5 a2.683.603.01
Ruzi 6 *710247193 y42.617.375.3 ab2.533.322.88
Ruzi 8735249187 y38.415.674.4 b2.803.332.84
Pooled SE 8.9012.58.973.021.462.010.070.160.17
p value 0.0520.2150.0470.1500.2330.0300.0930.2270.358
a,b,c,d Values within column and within grass with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); x,y Values within column and within grass with different superscripts show a trend to be different (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10). * Normal cutting age in Vietnam. A1 + A2 = in vitro fermentation potential of the soluble in insoluble carbohydrates; A:P = acetic to propionic acid ratio; BCVFA = branched-chain volatile fatty acids; NGR = non-glucogenic to glucogenic ratio; OM = organic matter; TVFA = total volatile fatty acid.
Table 3. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility, gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of four grasses (Guinea, Hamil, Mombasa, and TD58) belonging to the Panicum genus grown between 1 and 6 weeks.
Table 3. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility, gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of four grasses (Guinea, Hamil, Mombasa, and TD58) belonging to the Panicum genus grown between 1 and 6 weeks.
GrassWeekdOMGP-72A1 + A2CH4-72CH4:GP-72TVFABCVFANGRA:P
g/kg OMmL/g OM% of GP-72mM% of TVFAmol/mol
Guinea1739 ab251 ab182 ab46.1 a18.574.93.69 a3.683.24
Guinea2762 a251 a190 a48.0 a19.478.03.74 a3.723.31
Guinea3713 c248 a180 ab47.1 a19.277.63.44 ab3.773.34
Guinea4625 e189 c116 c27.2 b14.471.33.01 c3.683.20
Guinea5 *678 d249 ab182 ab46.4 a18.573.13.35 ab3.583.12
Guinea6645 e220 bc167 b43.2 a19.770.23.25 ab3.653.17
Pooled SE 4.287.595.582.831.742.250.110.140.18
p value <0.0010.007<0.0010.0020.0700.0790.0230.3230.264
Hamil2768 a25419349.519.578.0 a3.86 a3.563.17
Hamil4669 b25518349.718.374.4 ab2.93 b3.613.11
Hamil5 *670 b23418147.819.373.5 ab2.90 b3.603.13
Hamil6621 b23717242.318.970.7 b2.89 b3.533.07
Pooled SE 7.1315.112.34.621.572.480.090.120.16
p value 0.0110.5000.2990.5600.3840.0160.0080.7770.320
Mombasa270925218747.518.973.93.25 a3.593.14
Mombasa472628021052.218.776.33.20 a3.583.15
Mombasa5 *70427321146.917.181.72.95 b3.573.08
Mombasa667226518845.417.374.82.80 c3.603.10
Pooled SE 11.17.364.263.411.732.080.030.100.16
p value 0.3100.3780.2250.0720.5750.4050.0020.7270.725
TD581797 a28619754.2 ab19.178.04.19 a3.92 a3.36 a
TD582774 ab26720351.8 ab19.276.33.34 b3.53 b3.07 b
TD583735 bc27020149.3 ab18.277.42.94 c3.56 b3.07 b
TD584773 ab29320753.9 a18.579.23.19 bc3.73 ab3.16 b
TD585 *728 c27120049.2 ab18.373.53.16 bc3.63 b3.14 b
TD586740 bc26419545.1 b17.375.13.24 bc3.68 ab3.16 b
Pooled SE 7.085.436.972.611.021.70.080.120.15
p value 0.0090.0870.6700.0090.1710.115<0.0010.0280.016
a,b,c,d,e Values within column and within grass with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). * Normal cutting age in Vietnam. A1 + A2 = in vitro fermentation potential of the soluble in insoluble carbohydrates; A:P = Hac to Hpr ratio; BCVFA = branched-chain volatile fatty acids; NGR = non-glucogenic to glucogenic ratio; TVFA = total volatile fatty acid.
Table 4. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility (dOM), gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of three grasses (King, Napier, and VA06) belonging to the Pennisetum genus grown between 1 and 9 weeks.
Table 4. In vitro 72 h organic matter digestibility (dOM), gas (GP-72) and methane production (CH4-72) parameters and volatile fatty acids related values of three grasses (King, Napier, and VA06) belonging to the Pennisetum genus grown between 1 and 9 weeks.
GrassWeekdOMGP-72A1 + A2CH4-72CH4:GP-72TVFABCVFANGRA:P
g/kg OMml/g OM% of GP-72mM% of TVFAmol/mol
King3731 a241 b179 c42.2 b17.673.73.27 a3.823.37 a
King5751 a271 a211 a50.9 a18.977.93.09 a3.683.13 b
King7 *703 a262 a204 b48.6 a18.676.72.62 b3.653.03 b
King9623 b240 b183 c43.0 b17.971.72.62 b3.653.10 b
Pooled SE 8.089.669.232.541.401.170.100.130.17
p value 0.0090.0060.0020.0030.0510.1490.0430.0910.026
Napier275826921050.8 ab18.9 ab76.83.20 ab3.73 a3.33 a
Napier375726519552.7 a20.0 a76.93.25 a3.78 a3.34 a
Napier476228520653.2 a18.7 ab78.53.16 ab3.79 a3.24 ab
Napier576028421850.8 ab18.0 ab77.33.20 ab3.74 a3.23 ab
Napier675128521351.9 a18.3 ab76.33.20 abc3.76 a3.26 ab
Napier7 *77027821752.3 a18.9 ab79.82.85 abc3.65 a3.15 b
Napier874028721152.2 a18.2 ab77.32.89 bc3.67 a3.18 b
Napier972827120746.2 b17.1 b77.82.67 c3.53 b2.98 b
Pooled SE 8.5611.311.22.561.261.970.080.120.17
p value 0.0870.1600.1200.0130.0290.8040.0090.0030.012
VA061764 a216 c152 b39.6 c18.169.9 c4.16 a3.77 ab3.41 a
VA062737 ab245 ab184 ab46.0 b18.873.8 bc3.46 bc3.84 a3.40 a
VA063756 a274 a204 a51.8 a19.077.1 ab3.49 b3.72 ab3.31 ab
VA064766 a276 a214 a53.7 a19.377.6 ab3.23 c3.81 ab3.32 ab
VA065758 a289 a217 a54.1 a18.978.4 a2.91 d3.71 ab3.20 bc
VA066702 b261 ab185 ab50.6 a19.574.3 abc3.38 bc3.71 ab3.22 bc
VA067 *706 b287 a212 a51.8 a18.178.5 a2.69 d3.75 ab3.21 bc
VA068627 c253 ab184 ab45.6 b18.171.0 c2.78 d3.66 b3.09 c
VA069643 bc254 ab187 ab46.7 b18.575.6 ab2.68 d3.76 ab3.22 bc
Pooled SE 10.211.612.32.731.251.770.110.120.18
p value <0.0010.010.008<0.0010.442<0.001<0.0010.048<0.001
a,b,c,d Values within column and within grass with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). * Normal cutting age in Vietnam. A1 + A2 = in vitro fermentation potential of the soluble in insoluble carbohydrates; A:P = Hac to Hpr ratio; BCVFA = branched-chain volatile fatty acids; NGR = non-glucogenic to glucogenic ratio; TVFA = total volatile fatty acid.
Table 5. Relative yields (%) of dry matter content, in vitro digestible organic matter (dOM) and in vitro fermentation potential (GP, A1 + A2) of three grasses for early and late cutting 1 compared to practical harvest time (100%) in Vietnam.
Table 5. Relative yields (%) of dry matter content, in vitro digestible organic matter (dOM) and in vitro fermentation potential (GP, A1 + A2) of three grasses for early and late cutting 1 compared to practical harvest time (100%) in Vietnam.
GrassMombasaMulato IIKing
Regrowth Week245624683579
DM95.898.610010168.484.210011611610810092.2
dOM95.199.010096.873.892.010011611511210083.9
GP11212710012671.592.810011010210810086.7
A1 + A210111410010773.898.910011497.310810084.9
1 Assuming additivity of harvest time. DM = dry matter content; GP = in vitro cumulative gas production; A1 + A2 = in vitro fermentation potential of the soluble in insoluble carbohydrates. Based on data from Hare et al. [19,20] and Sales et al. [21].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, H.T.D.; Schonewille, J.T.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Nguyen, T.X.; Hendriks, W.H. In Vitro Gas Production of Common Southeast Asian Grasses in Response to Variable Regrowth Periods in Vietnam. Fermentation 2024, 10, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10060280

AMA Style

Nguyen HTD, Schonewille JT, Pellikaan WF, Nguyen TX, Hendriks WH. In Vitro Gas Production of Common Southeast Asian Grasses in Response to Variable Regrowth Periods in Vietnam. Fermentation. 2024; 10(6):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10060280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Huyen Thi Duong, Jan Thomas Schonewille, Wilbert Frans Pellikaan, Trach Xuan Nguyen, and Wouter Hendrikus Hendriks. 2024. "In Vitro Gas Production of Common Southeast Asian Grasses in Response to Variable Regrowth Periods in Vietnam" Fermentation 10, no. 6: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10060280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop