Next Article in Journal
Exploration of Co-Inoculation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Kazachstania bulderi for Potential Use in Mushroom Pleurotus eryngii Pickle Fermentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Maize–Lablab Intercropping and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Forage Yield, Fermentation Quality and Profitability
Previous Article in Journal
Ensiling of High-Moisture Plant By-Products: Fermentation Quality, Nutritional Values, and Animal Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Application in High-Moisture Broccoli Waste Silage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances and Future Directions in the Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing

1
Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Department of Grassland Science, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
Institute of Qinhai-Tibetan Plateau, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610225, China
4
College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(8), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080427
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 12 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing)

1. Introduction

The “The Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing” Special Issue (SI) in Fermentation has brought together groundbreaking research and innovative methodologies in the realm of forage preservation. With a total of eight publications, this SI has significantly advanced our understanding of the role of Lactobacillus in enhancing the quality and nutritional value of stored forage. As we conclude this SI, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the strides made, identify remaining knowledge gaps, and propose future research directions that can further enrich this field.

2. Recent Developments

The contributions to this SI have collectively underscored the pivotal role of Lactobacillus species in forage preservation. Notably, the research highlighted several key developments.

2.1. Microbial Dynamics

The principle of natural silage is a spontaneous process of fermentation of water-soluble carbohydrates in forages by epiphytic microorganisms under anaerobic conditions into mainly lactic acid, which involves the succession of microbial communities. Many factors influence microbial succession during ensiling, and many studies have been conducted on factors such as temperature, duration, and density. Novelly, Li et al. [1] evaluated the effects of different salt ion (Na+ and K+) concentrations on microbial community assembly in alfalfa silage. Salt ions were found to have significant impacts on the bacterial community structure of alfalfa silage for the first time. Under moderate ion concentrations (2–3% salt content), the growth-promoting effect of beneficial microbes and the inhibition of harmful microbes finally improved the silage quality of alfalfa. In another study, the intricate interplay between exogenous Lactobacillus and other microbial communities during forage storage was elucidated, revealing how specific strains can dominate and positively influence the microbial ecosystem, thereby improving silage quality. Lei et al. [2] assessed the effects of lactic acid bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri) and formic acid addition on the fermentation quality, microbial community dynamics, and predicted functional characteristics of alfalfa and perennial ryegrass mixed silage. Based on the original natural fermentation (control), the addition of inoculants further accelerated the succession of bacterial communities from Hafnia obesumbacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, and Sphingomonas to Lactiplantibacillus and Lentilactobacillus. The combined inoculation of L. plantarum and L. buchneri resulted in a higher relative abundance of “biosynthesis of antibiotics” and “biosynthesis of amino acids” and lower relative abundance of “quorum sensing” in silage bacterial communities. The results indicated that Lactobacillus could improve the fermentation quality of silage by driving the directed succession of forage microbial community and activating the beneficial metabolic pathway related to anaerobic activity.

2.2. Nutritional Improvements

The use of Lactobacillus not only preserves but also enhances the nutritional profile of forage. Studies showed increased levels of digestible fibers and preservation of essential nutrients, contributing to better livestock health and productivity. The studies of Yu et al. [3] and Yi et al. [4] evaluated the effects of L. plantarum LP1 on the fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of various mixed silages. The addition of this inoculant effectively improved their fermentation qualities, indicated by lower pH levels and higher lactic acid production in silages. Meanwhile, they also found that the treated silages showed higher in vitro digestibility under 55–60% moisture content. These improvements indicate that the inoculants not only preserve but also enhance the nutritional quality of the forages.

3. Addressing Knowledge Gaps

While significant progress in silage research has been made, several gaps in our understanding remain. The research in this SI has begun to address these gaps, paving the way for further exploration.

3.1. Strain Specificity and Efficacy

There is a need for more comprehensive studies on the strain-specific effects of Lactobacillus on different forage types. Understanding which strains are most effective under varying conditions can lead to more targeted and efficient applications. Dong and Yuan [5] present a detailed investigation into the isolation, characterization, and application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains specifically suited for high-moisture silage. This study addresses a significant challenge in the field of agricultural waste management, particularly the preservation and utilization of high-moisture vegetable waste. They provide compelling evidence that LAB strains isolated from high-moisture material can significantly improve their fermentation quality. The study highlights the strain-specific efficacy of isolated L. plantarum CB120 in improving the fermentation quality and nutritional value of broccoli waste silage. Future research should explore the application of such strain-specific LAB inoculants in other high-moisture materials to further validate their efficacy and broaden their practical utility.

3.2. Mechanisms of Action

The precise mechanisms by which Lactobacillus enhances forage preservation at the molecular level remain partially understood. Further research into these mechanisms can help optimize the use of Lactobacillus inoculants. For instance, by means of metabolomics and other techniques, the study of An et al. [6] provides significant contributions to understanding how L. plantarum A50 enhances nitrite degradation at the metabolic and molecular levels. Due to the existence of non-acidic initial degradation, the strain L. plantarum A50 employs mechanisms beyond simple acid production for nitrite degradation. This study offers valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms by which L. plantarum A50 enhances nitrite degradation and forage preservation, presenting opportunities to optimize the use of this inoculant for better forage quality and safety.

3.3. Long-Term Stability

Numerous studies have demonstrated that Lactobacillus inoculants improve the fermentation process, resulting in lower pH levels and increased lactic acid production, while the long-term effects of Lactobacillus inoculation on forage quality and safety need to be studied more extensively. This includes the impact on aerobic stability and digestibility, and even continuous animal performance. Liu et al. [7] and Yi et al. [8] found that the aerobic stability of silage inoculated with Lactobacillus and cellulase increased significantly compared to the control. Specifically, the aerobic stability of the mixed silage inoculated with the combination of Lactobacillus and cellulase was extended by 57 h under 60% moisture content compared to the control. This enhancement in aerobic stability is crucial for maintaining stability and preventing spoilage of forage over time. These findings underscore the importance of Lactobacillus-based inoculants in improving the fermentation quality and long-term stability of forage. By enhancing both the aerobic stability and nutritional quality of silage, these additives play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of forage as animal feed.

4. Future Research Directions

To build on the foundation laid by the studies in this SI, future research should focus on several key areas: (1) Innovative Inoculant Formulations: with the advent of synthetic microbiology, developing new formulations that combine Lactobacillus with other beneficial microorganisms or additives could further enhance forage preservation and nutritional value. (2) Field Trials and Practical Applications: large-scale field trials are essential to validate the laboratory findings and assess the practical applications of Lactobacillus inoculants in diverse agricultural settings. (3) Environmental Impact: investigating the environmental impact of using Lactobacillus in forage preservation, including its effect on greenhouse gas emissions and environmental health, can provide a holistic view of its benefits and potential trade-offs. (4) Technological Integration: integrating modern biotechnological tools, such as genomic and proteomic analyses, can offer deeper insights into the interaction between Lactobacillus and forage components, leading to more precise and effective applications.

5. Conclusions

This SI has made a certain contribution to the field, highlighting the potential of Lactobacillus to revolutionize forage preservation. By addressing existing knowledge gaps and focusing on future research directions, we can continue to enhance the quality and sustainability of forage, ultimately benefiting livestock health and agricultural productivity. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all the contributors for their invaluable research and dedication, and I look forward to witnessing the continued advancements in this field.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.; Bao, Y.; Lv, M.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Q. Comparative Na+ and K+ Profiling Reveals Microbial Community Assembly of Alfalfa Silage in Different Saline-Alkali Soils. Fermentation 2023, 9, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lei, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; He, X.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, C. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Formic Acid Improve Fermentation Quality and Beneficial Predicted Functional Characteristics in Mixed Silage Consisting of Alfalfa and Perennial Ryegrass. Fermentation 2024, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, M.; Wang, P.; Li, F.; Du, J.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, T.; Yi, Q.; Tang, H.; Yuan, B. Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Digestibility of Sweet Corn Processing Byproducts Silage Mixed with Millet Hull or Wheat Bran and Inoculated with a Lactic Acid Bacteria. Fermentation 2024, 10, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yi, Q.; Yu, M.; Wang, P.; Du, J.; Zhao, T.; Jin, Y.; Tang, H.; Yuan, B. Effects of Moisture Content and Silage Starter on the Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Digestibility of Waxy Corn Processing Byproduct Silage. Fermentation 2023, 9, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dong, C.; Yuan, J. Characteristics of Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Application in High-Moisture Broccoli Waste Silage. Fermentation 2024, 10, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. An, J.; Sun, L.; Liu, M.; Dai, R.; Si, Q.; Ge, G.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Y. Mechanistic Insights into Nitrite Degradation by Metabolites of L. plantarum A50: An LC-MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis. Fermentation 2024, 10, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, H.; Li, X.; Hu, J.; Zhao, J.; Xu, G.; Dong, D.; Jia, Y.; Shao, T. Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability Evaluation of Rice Straw Silage with Different Ensiling Densities. Fermentation 2024, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yi, Q.; Wang, P.; Yu, M.; Zhao, T.; Li, X.; Tang, H. Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality, In Vitro Digestibility, and Aerobic Stability of Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) and Wheat Bran Mixed Silage. Fermentation 2023, 9, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, J.; Mu, L.; Guan, H.; Cheng, Q.; Shao, T. Advances and Future Directions in the Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing. Fermentation 2024, 10, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080427

AMA Style

Zhao J, Mu L, Guan H, Cheng Q, Shao T. Advances and Future Directions in the Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing. Fermentation. 2024; 10(8):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Jie, Lin Mu, Hao Guan, Qiming Cheng, and Tao Shao. 2024. "Advances and Future Directions in the Use of Lactobacillus in Forage Storage and Processing" Fermentation 10, no. 8: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10080427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop