Next Article in Journal
Wineinformatics: Can Wine Reviews in Bordeaux Reveal Wine Aging Capability?
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Soil Application of Digestate Enriched with P, K, Mg and B on Yield and Processing Value of Sugar Beets
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing the Quality of Total Mixed Ration Containing Cottonseed or Rapeseed Meal by Optimization of Fermentation Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Extraction of Volatile Fatty Acids from Fermented Wastewater Using Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sheep Manure and Waste from a Potato Processing Factory: Techno-Economic Analysis

by
Rubén González
1,
Daniel Blanco
1,
José García Cascallana
1,
Daniela Carrillo-Peña
2 and
Xiomar Gómez
2,*
1
Department of Applied Chemistry and Physics, Area of Chemical Engineering, Campus de Vegazana, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
2
Chemical and Environmental Bioprocess Engineering Group, Natural Resources Institute (IRENA), Department of Applied chemistry and Physics, University of León, Av. de Portugal 41, 24071 León, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2021, 7(4), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040235
Submission received: 21 September 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 14 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass and Waste Valorization)

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of sheep manure and potato waste was studied under batch and semi-continuous conditions. Biochemical methane potential tests were carried out for the different substrates before evaluating co-digestion at high-solid content. The reactors presented stable performance under mesophilic conditions, at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 3.5–4.0 kg VS/m3 and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of approximately 20 days. Increasing the OLR of semi-continuous reactors decreased the methane yield and degradation efficiency of the digestion. Methane-specific production was in the range of 196 and 467 mL CH4/g vs. (sheep manure system and co-digestion, respectively). Based on the experimental data obtained, a techno-economic study was performed for wet and solid-state fermentation systems, with the first configuration presenting better results. The economic feasibility of the hypothetical plant was analyzed considering the variability in electricity and compost selling prices. The economic feasibility of the plant was determined with an electricity selling price of EUR 0.25/kWh, and assuming a centralized plant serving several farmers. Still, this price was considered excessive, given the current electricity market values.
Keywords: co-digestion; high-solid digestion; reactor configuration; economic feasibility co-digestion; high-solid digestion; reactor configuration; economic feasibility

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, R.; Blanco, D.; Cascallana, J.G.; Carrillo-Peña, D.; Gómez, X. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sheep Manure and Waste from a Potato Processing Factory: Techno-Economic Analysis. Fermentation 2021, 7, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040235

AMA Style

González R, Blanco D, Cascallana JG, Carrillo-Peña D, Gómez X. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sheep Manure and Waste from a Potato Processing Factory: Techno-Economic Analysis. Fermentation. 2021; 7(4):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040235

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Rubén, Daniel Blanco, José García Cascallana, Daniela Carrillo-Peña, and Xiomar Gómez. 2021. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sheep Manure and Waste from a Potato Processing Factory: Techno-Economic Analysis" Fermentation 7, no. 4: 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040235

APA Style

González, R., Blanco, D., Cascallana, J. G., Carrillo-Peña, D., & Gómez, X. (2021). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sheep Manure and Waste from a Potato Processing Factory: Techno-Economic Analysis. Fermentation, 7(4), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop