Next Article in Journal
Improvement of the Nutritional Quality of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus Tubers by Fermentation with Ruminal Crabtree-Negative Yeasts on the In Vitro Digestibility and Fermentation in Rumen Fluid
Previous Article in Journal
The Addition of Biochar and Hyper-Thermal Inoculum Can Regulate the Fate of Heavy Metals Resistant Bacterial Communities during the Livestock Manure Composting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

pH Auto-Sustain-Based Fermentation Supports Efficient Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis CD0817

1
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
2
Sino-German Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
3
Hangzhou Xiaoshan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311200, China
4
Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(5), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8050208
Submission received: 24 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 3 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Metabolism, Physiology & Genetics)

Abstract

:
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays a role in several physiological functions. GABA production by lactic acid bacteria has attracted considerable interest; however, there is need to improve production. This study aimed to develop a pH auto-sustain (PAS)-based GABA fermentation process for Lactobacillus brevis CD0817, with L-glutamic acid (solubility ~6.0 g/L and isoelectric point 3.22) as the substrate. Firstly, we determined the optimum levels of vital factors affecting GABA synthesis using Erlenmeyer flask experiments. The results showed that optimal levels of sugar, yeast extract, Tween-80, manganese ion, and temperature were 5.0 g/L, 35.0 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 16.0 mg/L, and 30.0 °C, respectively. The added L-glutamic acid (650 g per liter of medium) mostly existed in the form of solid powder was slowly released to supply the substrate and acidity essential for GABA production with the progress of fermentation. Based on the optimizations, the PAS-based GABA fermentation was performed using a 10 L fermenter. The PAS-based strategy promoted GABA synthesis by the strain of up to 321.9 ± 6.7 g/L after 48 h, with a productivity of 6.71 g/L/h and a substrate molar conversion rate of 99.6%. The findings suggest that the PAS-based fermentation is a promising method for GABA production by lactic acid bacteria.

1. Introduction

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-proteinogenic amino acid that is extensively distributed in nature [1,2] and functions as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in mammals [3,4]. GABA is also associated with the auditory cortex [5] and psychosis states [6]. Furthermore, GABA possesses therapeutic effects on liver injury [7], hepatic encephalopathy [8], and mechanical pain [9] and also possesses antidiabetic and hypotensive properties [10]. Therefore, GABA has been widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries [11]. Moreover, GABA is a precursor for the synthesis of biodegradable polyamide 4 [12,13,14].
Over the past three decades, GABA production by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) has been extensively studied because of the safe status of LAB [15,16,17]. Generally, a glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) system in the LAB cell is responsible for synthesizing GABA [18]. The system consists of glutamate/GABA antiporter (GadC) and glutamate decarboxylase (GadA/GadB). The mechanism and process of GABA synthesis by the GAD system is as follows: (i) glutamate is imported into the cell by GadC; (ii) the imported glutamate is decarboxylated to GABA by intracellular GadA/GadB, simultaneously releasing one molecule of carbon dioxide; and (iii) the final product, GABA, is exported out of the cell by GadC.
Many LAB with GAD activity, including lactobacilli and lactococci strains, have been screened and identified [19,20,21]. A few LAB strains exhibit potential application for industrial GABA production. However, the production efficiency of LAB-sourced GABA still needs to be enhanced. Researchers have been striving to seek strategies for elevating GABA bioconversion efficiency. Up to date, several strategies have been employed to improve GABA synthesis by LAB strains. These strategies can vary substantially in experiments but fall into two types: (i) modern biotechnology-dependent strategies and (ii) traditional fermentation optimizations [22,23,24,25]. As a modern strategy, the genetic improvement based on understanding the cell physiology could effectively enhance GABA production by LAB strains [26]. For instance, Wu and Shah [27] demonstrated that early acidification of the fermentation environment can partly ameliorate the inhibitory effect of oxygen on GABA synthesis by L. brevis NPS-QW-145. Additionally, Gong et al. [28] found deleting the global nitrogen regulator (glnR) gene increased the amount of GABA synthesized by L. brevis ATCC367 from 26.3 to 284.7 g/L.
Traditional optimization has also been proved to be an effective way to elevate the GABA production of LAB strains. For instance, the traditional optimizations have led to a 0.41, 0.31, and 10.29-fold increase in GABA production by L. brevis TCCC 13007 [29], L. brevis K203 [30], and L. buchneri WPZ001 [31], respectively. During GABA fermentation, an acidic environment is essential for activating the GAD system [32]. In the traditional method, which involves the use of monosodium L-glutamate (MSG) as substrate, the environment is progressively alkalized as fermentation progresses because of the consumption of one proton with each decarboxylation. Therefore, acidic agents are fed into the culture broth to maintain the acidic environment essential for GAD activity [33]. This process results in energy and resource wastage, and the introduced acid radical may inhibit the decarboxylation process [34].
In contrast, L-glutamic acid has a relatively low solubility (~6.0 g/L) and isoelectric point (3.22), making it an ideal substrate for GABA fermentation. Clearly, even if a massive amount of L-glutamic acid is added at once to the medium, it shows little inhibitory effect on GABA production as the L-glutamic acid mostly exists in solid powder form. Additionally, the dissolution of L-glutamic acid synchronizes with substrate consumption, thus maintaining the acidity of the fermentation broth.
Although many studies have been performed to improve GABA production by different LAB strains, an optimized method is yet to be developed for each strain. The aim of this study was to develop an optimized pH auto-sustain (PAS)-based fermentation method for efficient GABA production by L. brevis CD0817 [35], using L-glutamic acid as the substrate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Beef extract 01-009 and tryptone 01-002 were purchased from Aoboxing Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Yeast extracts FM405, FM408, FM803, FM818, FM828, and FM888; beef extract 81001536; bovine heart extract 81001494; bovine liver extract 81001539; bovine bone peptone FP328; tryptone FP318; soy peptone FP410; and yeast peptone FP103 were purchased from Angel Yeast Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The other nitrogen sources were obtained from Shuangxuan Microbe Culture Medium Products Factory (Beijing, China). L-glutamic acid was obtained from Dragon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Emeishan, China). MSG was purchased from Lanji Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was purchased from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The reagents used for high-performance liquid chromatography were of chromatographic grade, and other chemicals used in this work were of analytical grade.

2.2. Strain, Starting Media, and Preparation of Inoculum

L. brevis CD0817, a robust GABA producer, was previously isolated from fecal samples from a healthy adult [35]. The strain was stored in 50% glycerol at −80 °C and was resuscitated by culturing at 32 °C for 2 d following streaking on a plate.
The starting seed medium contained 25.0 g/L of yeast extract, 10.0 mg/L of MnSO4·H2O, 28.0 g/L of MSG, 2.0 g/L of Tween-80, and 50.0 g/L of glucose and was maintained at a pH of 5.0. The starting fermentation medium contained yeast extract (25.0 g/L), MnSO4·H2O (25.0 mg/L), Tween-80 (2.0 g/L), and glucose (25.0 g/L). Just before inoculation, sterilized L-glutamic acid solid powder was added in the amount of 650 g per liter of fresh fermentation broth. The added L-glutamic acid mostly existed in the form of solid powder due to its low solubility. L-glutamic acid, glucose, and the remaining components were separately sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min and mixed together before use [35].
We successively optimized the starting fermentation medium, fermentation temperature, glucose level of the starting seed medium, and seed age. The preparation of the seed medium varied with the advancing optimization. For optimizing the fermentation medium and temperature, the inocula were prepared at 32 °C using the starting seed medium. For optimizing the glucose level of the seed medium, the inocula were made at 32 °C. For optimizing the seed age, the inocula were prepared at 30 °C using the optimized seed medium. The optimized seed medium was identical to the starting seed medium, with the exception of the glucose being reduced to 10 g/L. The cells of L. brevis CD0817 were cultivated in a ZHWY-2102C rotary shaker (Zhicheng Inc., Shanghai, China) under constant rotation (100 rpm) and could be used as the inoculum when the absorbance at 600 nm (A600) reached 3.0–6.0.

2.3. Optimization Experiments

Single-factor experiments were performed to determine the optimal levels of key factors affecting GABA synthesis one by one. Once a key factor was optimized, its optimized level was thereafter incorporated into the fermentative formula and kept fixed in the following experiments. The starting fermentation medium, fermentation temperature, glucose level of the starting seed medium, and seed age were successively optimized. For the fermentation medium, levels of the glucose, nitrogen source, Mn2+, and Tween-80 were sequentially optimized. To achieve this, fermentation experiments were performed using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask (Sichuan Shuniu Co., Ltd., Chongzhou, China). The fermentation was initiated by transferring seed culture (inoculum size, 10%, v/v) into the flask containing 100 mL fermentation medium supplemented with 65 g solid powder L-glutamic acid. The fermentation was conducted at 32 °C for 96 or 72 h to optimize level of glucose/nitrogen source or of Mn2+/Tween-80, respectively, in the fermentation medium. The fermentation was conducted for 72 h to optimize the fermentation temperature. The fermentation was conducted at 30 °C for 60 h to optimize the seed medium glucose level or seed age. On the premise of assuring experiment quality, the stepwise reduction of fermentation time enhanced research efficiency. Each Erlenmeyer flask experiment was conducted in triplicate. Samples were aseptically withdrawn every 12 h to determine GABA content and A600.

2.4. Fermentation Trial

The optimized seed medium contained 25.0 g/L yeast extract, 10.0 mg/L MnSO4·H2O, 28.0 g/L MSG, 2.0 g/L Tween-80, and 10.0 g/L glucose and was maintained at a pH of 5.0. The optimized fermentation medium contained yeast extract (35.0 g/L), MnSO4·H2O (50.0 mg/L), Tween-80 (1.0 g/L), and glucose (5.0 g/L). Just before inoculation, 650 g of sterilized L-glutamic acid solid powder per liter of fermentation medium was added. The seed culture was made as described above. The seed culture (inoculum size, 10%, v/v) was inoculated in a 10 L fermenter containing 3.0 L of the optimized fermentation medium supplemented with 1950.0 g of solid powder L-glutamic acid and incubated at 30.0 °C under constant agitation (50 rpm) for 48 h. The fermenter was equipped with EasyFerm Plus 120 pH electrodes (Hamilton, Bonaduz, Switzerland) and two layers of six-flat-bladed impellers. The fermentation was performed under sealed conditions, and the cover of the fermentation tank was fitted with a silicone pipe to serve as an exhaust for carbon dioxide. The exhaust pipe was submerged in water to prevent air from entering the tank. Samples were aseptically withdrawn every 2 h to determine the GABA and residual sugar content and cell growth. All the samples were stored at −20 °C for further analysis. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.5. Analytic Procedures

The GABA concentration of the culture broth was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Briefly, after a 5 min treatment in a boiling bath, a sample of the culture broth was centrifuged at 8000× g for 3 min using a Sorvall ST 8R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Thereafter, the supernatant (20.0 μL) was subjected to derivatization at 25 °C for 5.0 min by mixing with 20.0 μL of the derivatization reagent and 100.0 μL borate buffer. Approximately 50 μL of the derived sample was injected into an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm). The high-performance liquid chromatography conditions were as follows: mobile phase flow rate 0.8 mL/min, column temperature 30 °C, and detection wavelength 338 nm. All data were expressed as the means ± standard deviations.
The amino acid derivatization reagent was freshly prepared by dissolving 10.0 mg of o-phthalaldehyde and 10 μL of 2-mercaptoethanol in 2.5 mL of acetonitrile. The borate buffer was prepared by adding 4.9 g of boric acid into 100 mL of ultrapure water, pH was adjusted to 10.4 using NaOH, and the solution was further diluted to 200.0 mL. The mobile phase was prepared as follows: 2.7 g of sodium acetate trihydrate and 200.0 μL of triethylamine were dissolved in 0.9 L of ultrapure water, pH was adjusted to 7.3 using acetic acid, the solution was diluted to a final volume of 1 L, and then mixed with 250.0 mL acetonitrile [36].
Cell biomass was expressed as A600 value. The cells were recovered by centrifugation at 5000× g for 5 min using a Sorvall ST 8R centrifuge and resuspended in an appropriate volume of 0.8% NaCl according to the dilution factors of different samples. Finally, cell growth was monitored by determining the A600 value on an UV1200B ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Mapada Instruments, Shanghai, China).
Residual glucose was quantitated by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 2 mL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was added into a tube containing 1 mL of 10-fold diluted samples, mixed, heated for 5 min in a boiling water bath, and immediately cooled with cold running water. Thereafter, 9 mL distilled water was added and mixed, and the A540 value of the mixture was determined using the UV1200B spectrophotometer.

2.6. Calculations

The substrate molar conversion rate (k) was calculated using the formula below:
k = 147.1   C G A B A V 103.1 m G l u   × 100 %
where cGABA is concentration of GABA (g/L), mGlu is mass of consumed L-glutamic acid (g), 147.1 is molar mass of L-glutamic acid (g/mol), 103.1 is molar mass of GABA (g/mol), and V is volume (L). It should be noted that 1 L of fresh medium increased to 1.41 L after L-glutamic acid was depleted.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics V22.0 software (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and a post hoc test was performed using Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. All charts and graphs were plotted using the Origin 2017 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Data were represented as means ± standard deviations (n =3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Glucose on GABA Production

Glucose is an ideal carbon source for GABA-synthesizing LAB [28,37]. Therefore, we determined the optimal glucose concentration for efficient GABA production. The results indicated that glucose concentration had little effects on the trend of GABA synthesis (Figure 1), that is, GABA was rapidly produced from 0 to 36 h across all the concentrations (0–40.0 g/L), plateauing afterward. However, GABA content varied with glucose concentration, with 5.0 g/L of glucose yielding the highest GABA concentration (283.5 ± 23.0 g/L) after 48 h of fermentation. Higher concentrations of glucose (10.0–40.0 g/L) instead slightly reduced GABA production (Figure 1). Lactobacillus brevis is a microaerophilic, obligately heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium that uses the phosphoketolase pathway to produce a mixture of lactic acid, ethanol, acetic acid, and CO2 as products of glucose fermentation [38,39]. The decrease in GABA concentration at higher glucose concentration could be attributed to the effects of the metabolites, such as lactic acid, ethanol, and acetic acid. Moreover, a mildly acidic (around 5.0) [40,41] environment is favorable for maximizing GAD activity, whereas extremely low pH (below 4.0) inhibits GAD activity [42,43]. High content of glucose generates massive amounts of organic acids and, thus, may inhibit GAD activity by further acidifying the environment [34,44]. However, the exact mechanism of glucose in GABA production remains poorly understood and requires further studies.
Additionally, the LAB strain examined in this study could grow and produce GABA in a glucose-free medium (Figure 1), indicating that a nitrogen source could also provide some essential carbons for microbial growth. The carbons mainly comprised peptides, amino acids, and nucleotides as the product label indicated. Overall, 5.0 g/L of glucose supported optimal GABA synthesis by L. brevis CD0817, which was lower than that (≥10.0 g/L) required by other strains of L. brevis for efficient GABA production [28,34,37,44].

3.2. Effect of Nitrogen Source on GABA Production

Several studies have shown that the nitrogen level has a considerable influence on GABA production by LAB [29,34,37]. For instance, tryptone, yeast extract, and whey powder are the best nitrogen sources for L. brevis HYE1 [45], L. plantarum EJ2014 [46], and L. brevis A3 [47], respectively; and a mixture of peptone, meat extract, and yeast extract enhanced GABA production by L. brevis CRL 2013 [22]. Therefore, the identification of the right nitrogen source and its optimal level is essential in enhancing GABA production [37,46,47]. In the present study, we examined the effects of 37 nitrogen sources on GABA production. The results indicated that the nitrogen source remarkably modulated GABA synthesis, as a GABA titer difference of up to 26.0-fold was observed among the nitrogen sources examined (Figure S1). Among which, yeast extract FM408 yielded the highest GABA output (239.4 ± 6.5 g/L), whereas soy peptones 02-19 yielded the lowest output (9.2 ± 0.5 g/L). Therefore, yeast extract FM408 was employed for further study.
Further analysis indicated an increase in GABA production with increase in yeast extract FM408 concentration from 0 to 30.0 g/L (Figure 2). Although higher concentrations (40.0–50.0 g/L) of yeast extract FM408 increased the cell biomass, it did not increase GABA production further (Figure 2). To guarantee efficient production of GABA, the dosage of yeast extract FM408 was suggested to be 35.0 g/L, slightly higher than 30.0 g/L. The glutamate (1.85 ± 0.05 g/L) introduced by 35.0 g/L of yeast extract FM408 had a minimal effect on the bioprocess.

3.3. Effect of Ions on GABA Production

The effects of several compounds including MnSO4, MgSO4, K2SO4, NaCl, CuSO4, ZnSO4, FeSO4, Ba(OH)2, CoSO4, and NiSO4 on the GABA production were individually evaluated. The results demonstrated that only MnSO4 had a positive effect on GABA synthesis (data not shown). Therefore, the effect of MnSO4 concentration on GABA production by L. brevis CD0817 was assessed. As shown in Figure 3a, Mn2+ was an indispensable factor for efficient GABA production. Overall, 11–55 mg/L Mn2+ supported peak GABA production; however, maximal cell growth occurred at 2.7–5.5 mg/L Mn2+ (Figure 3b). We speculated that the high GABA content resulting from 11–55 mg/L Mn2+ may have suppressed cell growth. Compared with the Mn2+-free control, 11–55 mg/L Mn2+ increased GABA production by 2.3-fold. To assure the need of the strain for Mn2+, 16 mg/L (slightly higher than 11 mg/L) of Mn2+ (equal to 50.0 mg/L MnSO4·H2O) was adopted.
Ions can affect GABA production in a strain-specific manner [41]. For instance, Mn2+, Cl, and Ca2+ plus Na+ have been shown to significantly enhance GABA production by L. brevis NCL912 [34], Lactococcus lactis NCDO 2118 [48], and L. brevis K203 [30,37], respectively. Additionally, GADs of Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus Y2, L. zymae, and L. sakei A156 were activated in vitro by Ba2+ [49], Mg2+ [50], and Co2+ plus Zn2+ [40], respectively. Generally, some ions can improve GAD activity by acting as cofactors [51]. Hence, it is necessary to screen and optimize ions for a specific GABA-producing LAB strain.

3.4. Effect of Tween-80 on GABA Production

Tween-80 has been widely used as an enhancer in the manufacture of lactic acid bacterial biologics, such as GABA [16,37], bacteriocins [52], and riboflavin [53]. Therefore, the effects of different concentrations (0–5.0 g/L) of Tween-80 on GABA production were evaluated in this study. The results showed that GABA production increased with increase in Tween-80 concentration from 0 to 1.0 g/L (Figure 4a), which was similar to the previous findings [22,34,54]. However, higher concentrations of Tween-80 did not significantly affect GABA synthesis. Therefore, 1.0 g/L of Tween-80 was selected for further experiments.
As an oleate, Tween-80 is a growth-stimulating factor for LAB strains [52]. Accordingly, the cell biomass of L. brevis CD0817 increased with increase in Tween-80 concentration in this study (Figure 4b). Increased cell biomass may contribute to GABA production. Moreover, as a non-ionic surfactant, Tween-80 may support oleic acid uptake by cells, which is then converted to cyclopropane fatty acid (a membrane fluidity enhancer) [52]. These findings indicated that Tween-80 may elevate GABA production by improving cell membrane permeability [34]. However, further studies should investigate whether Tween-80 can help maintain the acidic pH by promoting glucose metabolism.

3.5. Effect of Temperature on GABA Production

In the present study, we examined the effect of temperature (25–40 °C) on GABA synthesis by L. brevis CD0817. Generally, temperature significantly regulated GABA generation (Figure 5), with peak GABA production during the first 48 h achieved at 30 °C. However, 25 °C was slightly more suitable than 30 °C for GABA production by L. brevis CD0817 after 48 h, which could be because GAD activity is generally more stable under lower temperatures [49]. Additionally, temperatures above 30 °C significantly inhibited GABA production (Figure 5). Overall, 30 °C was the optimal temperature for GABA synthesis by L. brevis CD0817, which was similar to findings in L. brevis strains CRL 1942 [55] and RK03 [37]. Therefore, 30 °C was selected for further experiments.

3.6. Effect of Glucose in Seed Medium on GABA Production

The glucose level of the starting seed medium for L. brevis CD0817 was up to 50.0 g/L [35]. The findings of this study have shown that 5.0 g/L of glucose in the fermentation medium was the optimal level for GABA production. Therefore, it was necessary to reduce the glucose level of the seed medium for an efficient fermentation process. To achieve this, we examined the effect of the glucose level of the seed media on GABA fermentation efficiency. The results indicated that inoculum prepared using 10.0 g/L glucose resulted in an almost identical GABA titer to those prepared using higher levels of glucose (Figure 6), indicating that 10.0 g/L glucose was appropriate for seed medium preparation.

3.7. Effect of Seed Age on GABA Production

Next, we examined the effect of seed age on GABA production. GABA fermentation was initiated using seeds with A600 values ranging from 3.0 to 6.0 (4.8–9.7 × 108 CFU/mL). The data showed that seed age exhibited marginal effects on either GABA synthesis or strain growth (Figure 7), reflecting flexibility of inoculation.
Certain factors influence GABA production by LAB in a strain-specific manner [16,37]. The results of the present study showed that glucose, yeast extract, Tween-80, Mn2+, and temperature are key factors influencing GABA production by L. brevis CD0817, with optimal levels of 5.0 g/L, 35.0 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 16.0 mg/L, and 30 °C, respectively. Therefore, the seed medium was reconstituted to contain 10.0 g/L of glucose, 28.0 g/L of MSG, 35.0 g/L of yeast extract, 1.0 g/L of Tween-80, and 50.0 mg/L of MnSO4·H2O, and pH was maintained at 5.0. Additionally, the reconstituted fermentation medium was composed of glucose (5.0 g/L), yeast extract (35.0 g/L), Tween-80 (1.0 g/L), and MnSO4·H2O (50.0 mg/L). L-glutamic acid solid powder was added in the amount of 650 g per liter of fermentation medium.

3.8. PAS-Based GABA Bioprocess

Based on the results of the single-factor experiments, a PAS-based GABA fermentation bioprocess was prepared for L. brevis CD0817, and the efficiency of the bioprocess was evaluated. The findings of the single-factor experiments also showed that rapid GABA production occurred from 0 to 36 h (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Therefore, the PAS-based bioprocess was operated within a 48 h culture period.
The PAS-based fermentation process was performed using 3.0 L of the optimized fermentation medium, 10.0% (v/v) of inoculum size, and 1950.0 g of L-glutamic acid solid powder at 30 °C and 50 rpm. As shown in Figure 8, rapid cell growth occurred immediately after inoculation and decreased considerably after 14 h. GABA production increased external osmolarity that triggered water loss of bacteria. A negative effect on cell growth occurred when dehydration reached a physiologically unsustainable level at high GABA content. The high osmotic pressure arising from high content of GABA was assumed to cause the decline of cell growth [48,56]. Glucose was depleted within 10 h, but cell growth continued till 14 h, which could be attributed to carbon supply by yeast extract. GABA production during the first 6 h of the fermentation process was slow, followed by rapid production till 38 h, after which the production plateaued. The final GABA titer was 321.9 ± 6.7 g/L, with a productivity of 6.71 g/L/h and a substrate conversion ratio of 99.6%. The substrate was depleted within 48 h. Compared with the unoptimized process [37], the optimized process increased GABA production by 28.0%.
In the unoptimized process, the starting seed medium and the starting fermentation medium, described in the Section 2, were used to make the seed medium and conduct fermentation at 32 °C, respectively. The other parameters of the unoptimized process were identical to those of the optimized process. By analyzing the parameters and the results between the two fermentations, we attribute the variation of GABA contents to the differences in the glucose level and culture temperature, which have been discussed in the Section 3.1. “Effect of glucose on GABA production” and Section 3.5. “Effect of temperature on GABA production”, respectively.
The fresh fermentation medium saturated by L-glutamic acid had an extremely low pH (3.3). The pH was enhanced to 4.2 after inoculating the 150.0 mM MSG-based seed culture. The pH was maintained at 4.2 for the first 6 h of fermentation, followed by a gradual increase to approximate 6.0. The increase in pH followed a similar trend with GABA formation, which could be attributed to the consumption of H+ during decarboxylation [16,44,57]. Clearly, it is almost impossible to always maintain the optimal pH (around 5.0) required for decarboxylation during the PAS-based fermentation. However, the broth remained acidic due to the organic acids metabolized from carbons and the PAS activity of the substrate. Even if the substrate was depleted, the organic acids would prevent the final pH from exceeding 7.0. As one control, we conducted a non-pH-controlled MSG-based GABA fermentation (initial pH 5.0), which was identical to the PAS-based method with the exception of substituting 0.75 M MSG for L-glutamic acid. The results indicated that the pH was gradually increased, up to ~7.5 and ~8.0 at 48 and 72 h, respectively; meanwhile the decarboxylation rate was progressively decreased (data not shown). These data implied that the GAD-induced cell can decarboxylate the substrate even in a weakly alkaline environment, although its decarboxylation ability is decreased with the increase of pH. It, thus, could be concluded that the suboptimal acid environment should guarantee a satisfactory GABA bioconversion during the PAS-based fermentation, which was confirmed by the high GABA titer of 321.9 g/L (Figure 8). Overall, these findings indicated that L-glutamic acid was necessary for maintaining the low pH of the medium. However, whether L-glutamic acid is involved in other functions deserves further investigation.
Compared with this process, MSG is used as the substrate in the traditional GABA fermentation process. MSG has a neutral isoelectric point because of the substitution of sodium ion (Na+) on the α-carboxyl group for a hydrogen (H+). Park et al. [46] found that high levels of MSG can inhibit GABA production by introducing large amounts of Na+. Meanwhile, the alkalization of the environment attributed to the decarboxylation also exerted a negative effect on the GABA formation. In such a scenario, supplying an acid solution is necessary to maintain mild acidity [28]. However, the introduced acid radical can inhibit GABA synthesis and reduce the quality of the fermented product [42,43,58]. The PAS-based fermentation process developed in this study possesses some advantages over the MSG-based process. For instance, the substrate inhibitory effect on GABA production observed in MSG-based process was negligible in the PAS-based one. A brief comparison of the PAS-based GABA fermentation with the MSG-based ones is shown in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, a PAS-based GABA fermentation process was developed for efficient GABA production by L. brevis CD0817, with L-glutamic acid as the substrate. After 48 h of fermentation, GABA titer reached 321.9 g/L with a productivity of 6.71 g/L/h and a substrate conversion rate of 99.6%. Overall, these findings demonstrate the need for LAB strain-specific fermentation methods to maximize GABA production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation8050208/s1: Figure S1: The effect of nitrogen sources on GABA production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, M.J.; supervision, Y.Z.; data collection and analysis of GABA production, L.W.; data acquisition and interpretation of A600 value, T.S. and H.P.; funding acquisition and writing—review and editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 32160014 and 31570070), State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University (grant No. SKLF-ZZB-202118), and Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (grant No. 20171BCB23019) for financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ueno, Y.; Hayakawa, K.; Takahashi, S.; Oda, K. Purification and characterization of glutamate decarboxylase from Lactobacillus brevis IFO 12005. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1168–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Svensson, E.; Skoog, A.; Amend, J.P. Concentration and distribution of dissolved amino acids in a shallow hydrothermal system, Vulcano Island (Italy). Org. Geochem. 2004, 35, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wong, C.G.T.; Bottiglieri, T.; Snead, O.C. GABA, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and neurological disease. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, S3–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, Y.; Rui, Q.; Han, S.; Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, P.; Shen, Y.; Dai, H.; Xue, Q.; Li, Y. Reduced GABA levels in the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with cognitive impairment in patients with NMOSD. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 58, 103496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lalwani, P.; Gagnon, H.; Cassady, K.; Simmonite, M.; Peltier, S.; Seidler, R.D.; Taylor, S.F.; Weissman, D.H.; Polk, T.A. Neural distinctiveness declines with age in auditory cortex and is associated with auditory GABA levels. NeuroImage 2019, 201, 116033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wenneberg, C.; Glenthoj, B.Y.; Hjorthoj, C.; Zingenberg, F.J.B.; Glenthoj, L.B.; Rostrup, E.; Broberg, B.V.; Nordentoft, M. Cerebral glutamate and GABA levels in high-risk of psychosis states: A focused review and meta-analysis of (1)H-MRS studies. Schizophr. Res. 2020, 215, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hata, T.; Rehman, F.; Hori, T.; Nguyen, J.H. GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid, protects against severe liver injury. J. Surg. Res. 2019, 236, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cohen, B.I. The significance of ammonia/gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ratio for normality and liver disorders. Med. Hypotheses 2002, 59, 757–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Francois, A.; Low, S.A.; Sypek, E.I.; Christensen, A.J.; Sotoudeh, C.; Beier, K.T.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Ritola, K.D.; Sharif-Naeini, R.; Deisseroth, K.; et al. A Brainstem-spinal cord inhibitory circuit for mechanical pain modulation by GABA and enkephalins. Neuron 2017, 93, 822–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Han, S.; Lee, J. Production and its anti-hyperglycemic effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid from the wild yeast strain Pichia silvicola UL6-1 and Sporobolomyces carnicolor 402-JB-1. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Diana, M.; Quilez, J.; Rafecas, M. Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a bioactive compound in foods: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 10, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kawasaki, N.; Nakayama, A.; Yamano, N.; Takeda, S.; Kawata, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Aiba, S. Synthesis, thermal and mechanical properties and biodegradation of branched polyamide 4. Polymer 2005, 46, 9987–9993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, S.J.; Kim, E.Y.; Noh, W.; Oh, Y.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Song, B.K.; Cho, K.M.; Hong, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Jegal, J. Synthesis of nylon 4 from gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) produced by recombinant Escherichia coli. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Grewal, J.; Khare, S.K. 2-Pyrrolidone synthesis from gamma-aminobutyric acid produced by Lactobacillus brevis under solid-state fermentation utilizing toxic deoiled cottonseed cake. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Q.; Shah, N.P. High gamma-aminobutyric acid production from lactic acid bacteria: Emphasis on Lactobacillus brevis as a functional dairy starter. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 57, 3661–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, H.; Cao, Y. Lactic acid bacterial cell factories for gamma-aminobutyric acid. Amino Acids 2010, 39, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dhakal, R.; Bajpai, V.K.; Baek, K. Production of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) by microorganisms: A review. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C. Surviving the acid test: Responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lim, H.; Jung, D.; Cho, E.; Seo, M. Expression, purification, and characterization of glutamate decarboxylase from human gut-originated Lactococcus garvieae MJF010. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mousavi, R.; Mottawea, W.; Hassan, H.; Gomaa, A.; Audet, M.C.; Hammami, R. Screening, characterization and growth of γ-aminobutyric acid-producing probiotic candidates from food origin under simulated colonic conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yao, L.; Cao, J.; Lyu, C.; Fan, F.; Wang, H.; Cao, H.; Huang, J.; Mei, L. Food-grade γ-aminobutyric acid production by immobilized glutamate decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum in rice vinegar and monosodium glutamate system. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 43, 2027–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cataldo, P.G.; Villegas, J.M.; de Giori, G.S.; Saavedra, L.; Hebert, E.M. Enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production by Lactobacillus brevis CRL 2013 based on carbohydrate fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Takagi, H.; Kozuka, K.; Mimura, K.; Nakano, S.; Ito, S. Design of a full-consensus glutamate decarboxylase and its application to GABA biosynthesis. ChemBioChem 2021, 23, e202100447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, J.; Yoon, Y.W.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, G.A.; Bae, K.; Yoon, S.S. Gamma-aminobutyric acid fermentation in MRS-based medium by the fructophilic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Y7. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 31, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gong, L.; Ren, C.; Xu, Y. Deciphering the crucial roles of transcriptional regulator GadR on gamma-aminobutyric acid production and acid resistance in Lactobacillus brevis. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lyu, C.; Yao, L.; Zhu, Q.; Mei, J.; Cao, Y.; Hu, S.; Zhao, W.; Huang, J.; Mei, L.; Yao, S.; et al. Reconstruction of the glutamate decarboxylase system in Lactococcus lactis for biosynthesis of food-grade gamma-aminobutyric acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 4127–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Q.; Shah, N. Restoration of GABA production machinery in Lactobacillus brevis by accessible carbohydrates, anaerobiosis and early acidification. Food Microbiol. 2018, 69, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gong, L.; Ren, C.; Xu, Y. GlnR negatively regulates glutamate-dependent acid resistance in Lactobacillus brevis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e02615–e02619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Song, L.; Gao, Q.; Yu, S.; Li, L.; Gao, N. The two-step biotransformation of monosodium glutamate to GABA by Lactobacillus brevis growing and resting cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 94, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Binh, T.T.T.; Ju, W.; Jung, W.; Park, R. Optimization of γ-amino butyric acid production in a newly isolated Lactobacillus brevis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, A.; Hu, X.; Pan, L.; Wang, X. Isolation and characterization of a gamma-aminobutyric acid producing strain Lactobacillus buchneri WPZ001 that could efficiently utilize xylose and corncob hydrolysate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 3191–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Higuchi, T.; Hayashi, H.; Abe, K. Exchange of glutamate and gamma-aminobutyrate in a Lactobacillus strain. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 3362–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, H.; Qiu, T.; Huang, G.; Cao, Y. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912 using fed-batch fermentation. Microb. Cell Factories 2010, 9, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, Q.; Liu, X.; Fu, J.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Chang, K.; Li, H. Substrate sustained release-based high efficacy biosynthesis of GABA by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gao, D.; Chang, K.; Ding, G.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Jia, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Jin, Y.; Pan, H.; et al. Genomic insights into a robust gamma-aminobutyric acid-producer Lactobacillus brevis CD0817. AMB Express 2019, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Gao, D.; Cao, Y.; Xu, H. A high gamma-aminobutyric acid-producing Lactobacillus brevis isolated from Chinese traditional paocai. Ann. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 649–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, C.; Hsueh, Y.; Kuo, J.; Liu, S. Characterization of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus brevis RK03 and efficient production of γ-aminobutyric acid in batch fermentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Guo, T.; Zhang, L.; Xin, Y.; Xu, Z.; He, H.; Kong, J. Oxygen-inducible conversion of lactate to acetate in heterofermentative Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 367. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01659-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Teixeira, P. Lactobacillus: Lactobacillus brevis. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sa, H.D.; Park, J.Y.; Jeong, S.J.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, J.H. Characterization of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) from Lactobacillus sakei A156 isolated from Jeot-gal. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yogeswara, I.B.A.; Maneerat, S.; Haltrich, D. Glutamate decarboxylase from lactic acid bacteria-a key enzyme in GABA synthesis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seo, M.; Nam, Y.; Lee, S.; Park, S.; Yi, S.; Lim, S. Expression and characterization of a glutamate decarboxylase from Lactobacillus brevis 877G producing γ-aminobutyric acid. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Q.; Tun, H.M.; Law, Y.S.; Khafipour, E.; Shan, N.P. Common distribution of gad operon in Lactobacillus brevis and its GadA contributes to efficient GABA synthesis toward cytosolic near-neutral pH. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lyu, C.; Zhao, W.; Peng, C.; Hu, S.; Fang, H.; Hua, Y.; Yao, S.; Huang, J.; Mei, L. Exploring the contributions of two glutamate decarboxylase isozymes in Lactobacillus brevis to acid resistance and γ-aminobutyric acid production. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lim, H.; Cha, I.; Roh, S.; Shin, H.; Seo, M. Enhanced production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by optimizing culture conditions of Lactobacillus brevis HYE1 isolated from kimchi, a Korean fermented food. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Park, S.J.; Kim, D.H.; Kang, H.J.; Shin, M.; Yang, S.; Yang, J.; Jung, Y.H. Enhanced production of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) using Lactobacillus plantarum EJ2014 with simple medium composition. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 137, 110443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Behbahani, B.A.; Jooyandeh, H.; Falah, F.; Vasiee, A. Gamma-aminobutyric acid production by Lactobacillus brevis A3: Optimization of production, antioxidant potential, cell toxicity, and antimicrobial activity. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 5330–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Laroute, V.; Mazzoli, R.; Loubiere, P.; Pessione, E.; Cocaign-Bousquet, M. Environmental conditions affecting GABA production in Lactococcus lactis NCDO 2118. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, S.; Lin, Q.; Lu, Z.; Lu, F.; Bie, X.; Zou, X.; Sun, L. Characterization of a novel glutamate decarboxylase from Streptococcus salivarius ssp thermophilus Y2. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, J.Y.; Jeong, S.J.; Kim, J.H. Characterization of a glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) gene from Lactobacillus zymae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ueno, H. Enzymatic and structural aspects on glutamate decarboxylase. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2000, 10, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abbasiliasi, S.; Tan, J.S.; Ibrahim, T.A.T.; Bashokouh, F.; Ramakrishnan, N.R.; Mustafa, S.; Ariff, A.B. Fermentation factors influencing the production of bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria: A review. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 29395–29420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Del Valle, M.J.; Laiño, J.E.; de Giori, G.S.; Leblanc, J.G. Factors stimulating riboflavin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum CRL 725 grown in a semi-defined medium. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tanamool, V.; Hongsachart, P.; Soemphol, W. Screening and characterisation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from Thai fermented fish (Plaa-som) in Nong Khai and its application in Thai fermented vegetables (Som-pak). Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 40, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Villegas, J.M.; Brown, L.; de Giori, G.S.; Hebert, E.M. Optimization of batch culture conditions for GABA production by Lactobacillus brevis CRL 1942, isolated from quinoa sourdough. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 67, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bremer, E.; Krämer, R. Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 73, 313–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Small, P.L.C.; Waterman, S.R. Acid stress, anaerobiosis and gadCB lessons from Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xiao, T.; Shah, N.P. Lactic acid produced by Streptococcus thermophilus activated glutamate decarboxylase (GadA) in Lactobacillus brevis NPS-QW 145 to improve gamma-amino butyric acid production during soymilk fermentation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 137, 110474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of glucose on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in the 48 h GABA concentration of the tested glucose levels (p = 0.084). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 1. The effect of glucose on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in the 48 h GABA concentration of the tested glucose levels (p = 0.084). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g001
Figure 2. The effect of yeast extract FM408 on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The difference in 48 h GABA concentrations was not significant between 40 g/L and 50 (p = 0.979) or 30 g/L of yeast extract FM408 (p = 0.573), but it was significant between 40 g/L and 20 (p = 0.000) or 0 g/L of yeast extract FM408 (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 2. The effect of yeast extract FM408 on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The difference in 48 h GABA concentrations was not significant between 40 g/L and 50 (p = 0.979) or 30 g/L of yeast extract FM408 (p = 0.573), but it was significant between 40 g/L and 20 (p = 0.000) or 0 g/L of yeast extract FM408 (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g002
Figure 3. The effect of manganese ion on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The difference in 48 h GABA concentrations was not significant between 22 mg/L and 11 (p = 1.000), 55 (p = 0.936), or 5.5 mg/L of Mn2+ (p = 0.159), but it was significant between 22 mg/L and 2.7 (p = 0.003) or 0 mg/L of Mn2+ (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 3. The effect of manganese ion on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The difference in 48 h GABA concentrations was not significant between 22 mg/L and 11 (p = 1.000), 55 (p = 0.936), or 5.5 mg/L of Mn2+ (p = 0.159), but it was significant between 22 mg/L and 2.7 (p = 0.003) or 0 mg/L of Mn2+ (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g003
Figure 4. The effect of Tween-80 on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between 5 g/L and 2 (p = 1.000), 3.5 (p = 0.907), 1 (p = 0.587), or 0.5 g/L of Tween-80 (p = 0.143), but there was a significant difference between 5 and 0 g/L of Tween-80 (p = 0.024). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 4. The effect of Tween-80 on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 32.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between 5 g/L and 2 (p = 1.000), 3.5 (p = 0.907), 1 (p = 0.587), or 0.5 g/L of Tween-80 (p = 0.143), but there was a significant difference between 5 and 0 g/L of Tween-80 (p = 0.024). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g004
Figure 5. The effect of fermentation temperature on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between 25 °C and 30 °C (p = 0.926) or 32 °C (p = 0.136), but there was a significant difference between 25 °C and 35 °C (p = 0.000), 37 °C (p = 0.000), or 40 °C (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 5. The effect of fermentation temperature on (a) GABA production and (b) cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between 25 °C and 30 °C (p = 0.926) or 32 °C (p = 0.136), but there was a significant difference between 25 °C and 35 °C (p = 0.000), 37 °C (p = 0.000), or 40 °C (p = 0.000). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g005
Figure 6. The effect of seed medium glucose content on GABA production and cell growth. Inocula prepared using seed media with different levels of glucose were used for the fermentation experiment, which was performed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 30.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between the different glucose levels examined (p = 0.267). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 6. The effect of seed medium glucose content on GABA production and cell growth. Inocula prepared using seed media with different levels of glucose were used for the fermentation experiment, which was performed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 30.0 °C. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between the different glucose levels examined (p = 0.267). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g006
Figure 7. The effect of seed age on GABA production and cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 30.0 °C. Fermentations were performed using inocula with different A600 values, which were prepared from the seed media containing 10 g/L glucose. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between the different treatments (inocula different A600 value; p = 0.979). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 7. The effect of seed age on GABA production and cell growth. This was evaluated using a 250 mL Erlenmeyer fermentation flask at 30.0 °C. Fermentations were performed using inocula with different A600 values, which were prepared from the seed media containing 10 g/L glucose. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). There was no significant difference in 48 h GABA concentration between the different treatments (inocula different A600 value; p = 0.979). GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g007
Figure 8. pH auto-sustain-based GABA fermentation in a 10 L fermenter. The fermentation experiment was conducted at 30.0 °C and 50 rpm. Each liter of fermentation medium was supplemented with 650 g solid powder L-glutamic acid. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The 48 h GABA concentration was 321.9 ± 6.7 g/L. GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Figure 8. pH auto-sustain-based GABA fermentation in a 10 L fermenter. The fermentation experiment was conducted at 30.0 °C and 50 rpm. Each liter of fermentation medium was supplemented with 650 g solid powder L-glutamic acid. Cell growth was expressed as A600. Vertical bars represent standard deviations of means (n = 3). The 48 h GABA concentration was 321.9 ± 6.7 g/L. GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; A600, absorbance at 600 nm.
Fermentation 08 00208 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the effects of fermentation methods on gamma-aminobutyric acid production by lactic acid bacteria.
Table 1. Comparison of the effects of fermentation methods on gamma-aminobutyric acid production by lactic acid bacteria.
StrainMethodSubstrateTiter (g/L)Conversion Rate (%)Productivity (g/L/h)Reference
Lactobacillus brevis CD0817pH auto-sustainL-glutamic acid321.999.66.7This study
Lactobacillusbrevis ATCC 367ΔglnRpH-controlledMSG284.7NSNS[28]
Lactobacillus brevis D17pH-controlledMSG177.7NS4.9[25]
Lactobacillus brevis 9530: pNZ8148-gadBCpH-controlledMSG104.4NSNS[44]
Lactobacillus buchneri WPZ001NSMSG75.5NSNS[31]
Lactobacillus brevis RK03NSMSG62.593.3NS[37]
MSG: monosodium L-glutamate; NS: not specified; pH-controlled refers to pH-controlled fermentation in which pH was controlled by the feeding of an acid agent.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, T.; Pan, H.; Li, H. pH Auto-Sustain-Based Fermentation Supports Efficient Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis CD0817. Fermentation 2022, 8, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8050208

AMA Style

Jia M, Zhu Y, Wang L, Sun T, Pan H, Li H. pH Auto-Sustain-Based Fermentation Supports Efficient Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis CD0817. Fermentation. 2022; 8(5):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8050208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Mengya, Yisong Zhu, Lingqin Wang, Tianyi Sun, Hao Pan, and Haixing Li. 2022. "pH Auto-Sustain-Based Fermentation Supports Efficient Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis CD0817" Fermentation 8, no. 5: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8050208

APA Style

Jia, M., Zhu, Y., Wang, L., Sun, T., Pan, H., & Li, H. (2022). pH Auto-Sustain-Based Fermentation Supports Efficient Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactobacillus brevis CD0817. Fermentation, 8(5), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8050208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop