Next Article in Journal
Whitening Activity of Acteoside from Stachys sieboldii Fermented with Hericium erinaceus Mycelia on Melanocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Functional Characterization of Saccharomyces Yeasts from Cider Produced in Hardanger
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Cabernet Sauvignon Ripeness, Healthy State and Maceration Time on Wine and Fermented Pomace Phenolic Profile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Autochthonous Microbes to Produce Ligurian Taggiasca Olives (Imperia, Liguria, NW Italy) in Brine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Main Nutrient Sources on Improving Monascus Pigments and Saccharifying Power of Monascus purpureus in Submerged Fermentation

1
Institute of Agricultural Engineering Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China
2
Key Laboratory of Subtropical Characteristic Fruits, Vegetables and Edible Fungi Processing (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fuzhou 350003, China
3
Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products (Food) Processing, Fuzhou 350003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(7), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070696
Submission received: 22 June 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 20 July 2023 / Published: 24 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Application of Starter Cultures)

Abstract

:
Hong Qu (HQ), obtained through fermentation of various grains using Monascus spp., has been widely utilized as the main and characteristic initial saccharification and traditional fermentation starter in the food brewing industry. The quality, color, and flavor of HQ and HQ wine are closely related to the saccharifying power (SP) and Monascus pigments (MPs) of Monascus spp. In this study, to optimize the culture medium in submerged fermentation by M. purpureus G11 for improving SP and MPs, the effects of carbon source, nitrogen source, inorganic salts, and vitamins on SP activity and biosynthesis of MPs were explored through single-factor analysis and response surface Box–Behnken experiments. The results showed that the optimal medium composition was 6.008% rice powder, 1.021% peptone, 0.0049% CuSO4, and 0.052% vitamin B1. Validation experiments performed under the optimized fermentation conditions showed a significant increase in MPs and SP by 14.91% and 36.24%, with maximum MPs and SP reaching 112.61 and 365.12 u/mL, respectively. This study provides a theoretical basis for enhancing MPs and SP in M. purpureus for HQ production, to improve the production efficiency and shorten the production cycle of HQ-related fermentation products.

1. Introduction

Hong Qu (HQ) is one of the four traditional fermentation starters used in China, and is the main and characteristic initial saccharification and fermentation agent for fermented foods, such as Hong Qu glutinous rice wine (HQ wine), vinegar, and soy sauce [1,2,3]. HQ wine is the second most distinctive yellow rice wine in China. Unlike other types of yellow rice wine, HQ wine does not require the addition of colorants because the Monascus strains incorporated into the HQ wine during the brewing process can produce Monascus pigments (MPs), which give the wine a unique natural red–orange color. Monascus is widely used in the field of food fermentation, which can produce various important metabolites, including MPs, monacolin-like substances, and γ-aminobutyric acid, as well as various enzymes, such as amylase, glucoamylase, protease, pectinase, and esterification enzymes [4,5]. HQ used in the brewing industry must possess high saccharifying power (SP) and esterifying power [6,7]. The quality and safety of HQ play crucial roles in determining the flavor, color, functional activity, and overall quality of HQ wine [8]. Hence, enhancement of HQ quality is an important strategy for the development of the HQ wine industry. Although HQ has been widely used in the wine-making industry, the availability of only a few varieties of HQ starters and low fermentability significantly limit its applications [9].
Wine fermentation starters are the primary driving force for brewing yellow rice wine. Studies on HQ wine brewing have mainly focused on the microbial communities of the starters, fermentation processes, active substances, and volatile flavor components [10,11,12]. In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in research on esterification enzymes and saccharifying enzymes of Monascus spp., especially on the isolation and identification of α-amylase (liquefying power) and its fermentation optimization, analysis of genes related to esterification enzymes and their biosynthetic pathways, enhancement of production efficiency, and shortening of the production cycle of HQ-related fermentation foods [13,14,15,16,17]. Although most of the studies on saccharifying enzymes of Monascus spp. have mainly focused on its applications, only a few studies have investigated their fundamental characteristics [18]. Saccharifying enzymes can fully convert starch into fermentable sugar and provide necessary substrates for the fermentation process in the food brewing industry [19]. Although many researchers have attempted to use saccharifying fermentation agents directly in the saccharification stage of the wine-making process and obtained good outputs, the agent can cause rapid hydrolysis of starch, resulting in microecological imbalance during the fermentation process, which can decrease the wine quality and create a bitter taste [20]. Thus, improving the SP of HQ has gained increasing attention in recent years [21]. Because Monascus plays an important role in the HQ brewing industry, it is particularly critical to obtain Monascus strains that not only have high SP but also adequate quantities of MPs. The use of such efficient Monascus strains in brewing HQ can improve the quality of HQ, enhance the color and flavor of HQ wine, and reduce the amount of red HQ used in brewing. Although a representative strain, Monascus purpureus G11, which can produce high yield of MPs and strong SP, was isolated in our previous study, the fermentation process was optimized.
It is well known that optimization of medium composition can increase the production of beneficial metabolites, such as MPs and lovastatin, in Monascus spp., and reduce the generation of harmful products, such as citrinin [22,23]. Many researchers have studied the effects of changes in carbon and nitrogen sources as well as the addition of vitamins and inorganic salts on the metabolism of Monascus spp. For instance, Yang Dongcheng et al. found that Fe2+ ions can increase the production of MPs in Monascus spp. [24]. However, the effects of medium optimization on SP and MPs in M. purpureus have not been extensively investigated. Response surface methodology (RSM) has been used for optimization of fermentation conditions based on the sophisticated interactions among multiple process variables [25,26]. However, the use of RSM for the optimization of fermentation conditions for improving SP is limited.
In the present study, RSM was employed for the optimization of fermentation conditions for both SP activity and the production of MPs in M. purpureus. Submerged liquid fermentation (SmF), with the advantages of short cultivation period, easy control of conditions, and good reproducibility, was employed to investigate systematically the effects of several categories of main nutrient sources on the brewing strain, M. purpureus G11. The medium composition was optimized for improving SP and MPs of liquid seed production and solid-state fermentation by identifying the preferred nutrients, including carbon sources, nitrogen sources, inorganic salts, and vitamins (and precursor substances). A mathematical model was established using the response surface Box–Behnken experimental design to optimize the culture medium and further improve SP and MPs. The main indicators of HQ quality, namely, SP and color value, were used as the evaluation standard. The results of this study provide systematic technical support for research on liquid seed production and solid-state fermentation processes for brewing HQ.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain and Culture Conditions

M. purpureus G11, which can produce both a high yield of MPs and SP activity, was isolated from HQ collected from HQ wine manufacturers and preserved in our laboratory and at the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC, Wuhan, China; CCTCC No. M 2023550). For the initial growth, M. purpureus G11 was inoculated onto MEA slant (6% malt extract and 2% agar; pH 6–7; sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min) and incubated at 35 °C for 10 d. The seed and liquid media consisted of 6% glucose, 3% soluble starch, 1% peptone, 0.15% KH2PO4, 0.2% K2HPO4, 0.2% MgSO4, and 0.1% NaNO3 without pH adjustment, and were sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min. The seed culture was prepared as described previously, and 6% of the seed was inoculated onto 50 mL of aseptic liquid fermentation medium and incubated at 35 °C and 180 rpm for 96 h [27].

2.2. Metabolite Detection

Color value (yield of MPs, u/mL) was determined according to the Chinese National Standard (GB1886.19-2015), with three biological replicates. The fermentation broth in each flask (0.05 mL) was mixed well and then extracted with 25 mL of 70% ethanol at 60 °C for 1 h. After filtration and cooling to room temperature, the extracted liquid or filtrate was serially diluted (A times), and the optical density (OD) was measured using an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (UV-240, Shimadzu, Japan) against a 70% ethanol blank at 505 nm. The yield of MPs was calculated as follows: MPs = A × OD × V × 25, where A is the number of dilutions, OD is the optical density, and V is the total volume of the fermentation broth after fermentation (mL).
SP (u/mL) was determined according to the Chinese National Standard (QB/T 5188-2017), with three biological replicates. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the ability of 1.0 g of HQ to convert soluble starch into 1 mg of glucose in 1 h at 40 °C and pH 4.6. First, the fermentation broth in each flask (3 mL) was mixed well and then extracted with 22 mL of acetic acid–sodium acetate buffer solution at 35 °C for 2 h. After filtration and cooling to room temperature, the extracted liquid was used as the sample. Second, both 2% soluble starch solution (25 mL) and acetic acid–sodium acetate solution (5 mL) were added to two 50 mL colorimetric tubes in bottles A and B at 40 °C for 10 min. The extracted liquid sample (2 mL) was added to bottle A at 40 °C for 30 min, then 20% sodium hydroxide (0.2 mL) was added and mixed well, and cooled at 1–3 °C for 2 min. In bottle B (blank bottle), 20% sodium hydroxide (0.2 mL) was added and mixed well, cooled to room temperature, then 2 mL of the extracted liquid sample was added. Third, the solutions in bottles A and B (5 mL) were mixed well with iodine solution (10 mL) and 0.1 mol/L of sodium hydroxide (15 mL) for dark reaction (15 min), then 2 mol/L of sulfuric acid (2 mL) was added and the solution titrated with sodium thiosulfate solution until the blue color disappeared.
SP was calculated as follows: SP = ( V V 1 ) × C 1 × 90.05 × 32.2 5 × 1 2 × N × 2 , where V (mL) is the volume of thiosulfate sodium solution in the blank in bottle B, V1 (mL) is the volume of thiosulfate sodium solution in the sample in bottle A, C1 (mol/L) is the concentration of thiosulfate sodium standard solution, 90.05 (mg) is the mass of glucose equivalent to 1.00 mL of thiosulfate sodium, 32.2 (mL) is the total volume of the reaction solution, 5 (mL) is the volume of the reaction solution used, 1/2 is the sample volume conversion factor from 2 mL to 1 mL, N is the dilution factor (25 mL/3 mL), and 2 is the reaction time conversion factor from 30 min to 1 h.

2.3. Effects of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11 in SmF

The medium composition was optimized for improving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 by identifying the preferred nutrients. Accordingly, the effects of different carbon and nitrogen sources on M. purpureus G11 were determined using single-factor analysis by incubating M. purpureus G11 in basal medium containing different carbon sources (6%) (glucose, sucrose, corn starch, lactose, fructose, glycerin, maltose, rice powder, and galactose) and nitrogen sources (1%) (soybean powder, sodium glutamate, beef extract, fish meal, KNO3, peptone, yeast extract, soy powder, NH4NO3, (NH4)2SO4, and corn steep liquor), respectively, with the other factors remaining constant.

2.4. Effect of Inorganic Salt Sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11 in SmF

Inorganic salts, including CuSO4 (0.001% and 0.005%), FeSO4 (0.005% and 0.01%), LaCl3 (0.04% and 0.08%), MnCl2 (0.005% and 0.01%), MgSO4 (0.1%), KH2PO4 (0.2%), CoCl2 (0.005%), ZnSO4 (0.05% and 0.1%), and CaCl2 (1% and 1.5%), were added to the basal medium to ascertain their effects on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 using single-factor analysis. After determining the optimal inorganic salt source, the effect of inorganic salt concentration (0.001%, 0.0025%, 0.005%, 0.0075%, and 0.01%) on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 was investigated.

2.5. Effect of Vitamins on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11 in SmF

Vitamins, including vitamin B1 (VB1; 0.03% and 0.08%), vitamin B3 (VB3; 0.03% and 0.08%), vitamin B5 (VB5; 0.03% and 0.08%), vitamin B6 (VB6; 0.03% and 0.08%), vitamin B9 (VB9; 0.07% and 0.1%), erythorbic acid (EVC; 0.03% and 0.05%), and vitamin H (H; 0.03% and 0.08%), were individually added to the basal medium to investigate their effects on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 using single-factor analysis. After determining the optimal vitamin, the effect of vitamin concentration (0.01%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.07%, and 0.09%) on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 was analyzed.

2.6. Optimization of Medium Composition Using RSM

Based on the abovementioned results, the four selected medium components (rice powder, peptone, Cu2+, and VB1) were further optimized through RSM to achieve high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 (Table 1).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS and ANOVA to determine significant differences. All the experiments were performed in triplicate, and the average value was employed. The data were plotted using Origin Pro 8.6.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Carbon Source on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11

The carbon source is one of the most important components in the fermentation medium, which mainly provides the carbon skeleton for the microbial cells and synthesized products and supplies energy for metabolic activities [28,29]. The properties and utilization limitations of carbon sources can directly affect M. purpureus metabolism, which in turn can influence material synthesis and degradation, having a certain impact on the production of MPs [30,31]. The results of the present study indicated that the type of carbon source had a significant impact on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11 (Figure 1). The presence of fructose, maltose, and rice powder as carbon sources in M. purpureus G11 culture caused higher production of MPs and faster mycelial growth, with the yield of MPs reaching 95.81, 96.2, and 104.15 u/mL, respectively. Furthermore, cultivation of M. purpureus G11 in the presence of rice powder as carbon source caused higher SP (267.8 u/mL), which was significantly higher than that noted in the presence of other carbon sources (p < 0.05).
Glycosylation capacity is one of the important indicators reflecting the enzymatic ability of M. purpureus. The level of glycosylation capacity directly reflects the ability of M. purpureus to produce fermentable sugars, which ultimately affects wine production. M. purpureus exhibited the best saccharifying ability as well as higher production of MPs (104.15 u/mL) when cultivated in the presence of rice powder as carbon source. This obvious increase in MPs and SP in the presence of rice powder could possibly be owing to the ability of M. purpureus G11 to completely utilize the various nutrients in rice powder during cultivation. Therefore, rice powder was selected as the suitable carbon source for achieving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11.
It is worth noting that when corn starch was used as the carbon source, both MPs and SP were significantly low. We speculated that except for corn starch and rice flour, all the other carbon sources are small molecules that can be quickly dissolved and absorbed as nutrients. Only corn starch and rice powder are mixed nutrients, and rice powder contains abundant fast nutrients, such as monosaccharides and disaccharides, which can also provide the necessary nutrients for the growth and metabolism of M. purpureus G11. However, corn starch is the only pure long-chain starch among the carbon sources without fast nutrient components. The strain cannot grow rapidly, thus affecting the production of MPs and SP activity. In addition, the addition of corn starch results in a semisolid and viscous state of the culture medium, leading to low dissolved oxygen levels, which also restricts the initial growth of the strain. Therefore, neither the composition of corn starch nor the state of the culture medium can improve the growth of the strain and promote production of MPs and SP activity.

3.2. Effects of Nitrogen Source on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11

A nitrogen source is essential for microbial growth and synthesis of metabolites, and plays a crucial role in the process of MPs and SP by M. purpureus during fermentation [32]. The optimal nitrogen source for M. purpureus can vary depending on the strain [33,34,35]. As shown in Figure 2, the type of nitrogen source had a significant impact on the production of MPs and the saccharifying ability of M. purpureus G11. Among them, peptone and corn steep liquor had higher saccharification ability than other nitrogen sources, with SP of 263.55 and 258.55 u/mL, respectively, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). By contrast, production of MPs by M. purpureus G11 in the presence of peptone and corn steep liquor was 103.04 and 15.48 u/mL, respectively, with peptone causing significantly higher yield of MPs than corn steep liquor (p < 0.05). Hence, peptone was selected as the suitable nitrogen source for obtaining high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11.

3.3. Effects of Inorganic Salts on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11

Inorganic salts are essential for microbial growth and reproduction, and metal ions also play an important regulatory role in the secondary metabolism of microorganisms [36]. Different metal ions have different effects on the production of MPs and the saccharifying activity in M. purpureus. Accordingly, in the present study, the optimal inorganic salt and its appropriate concentration for achieving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 was screened among Cu2+, Fe2+, La3+, Mn2+, Mg2+, K+, Co2+, Zn2+, and Ca2+ as exogenous metal ion additives [37]. Based on the results of preliminary experiments, CuSO4 (0.001% and 0.005%), FeSO4 (0.005% and 0.01%), LaCl3 (0.04% and 0.08%), MnCl2 (0.005% and 0.01%), MgSO4 (0.1%), KH2PO4 (0.2%), CoCl2 (0.005%), ZnSO4 (0.05% and 0.1%), and CaCl2 (1% and 1.5%) were added to the culture medium of M. purpureus G11 to explore their effects on MPs and the saccharifying capacity of the strain.
As shown in Figure 3a, the type of inorganic salt had a significant effect on MPs and the saccharifying ability of M. purpureus G11. Addition of 0.001% Cu2+ significantly promoted the SP activity (309.62 u/mL) of M. purpureus G11 in comparison with other inorganic salts (p < 0.05). Moreover, 0.001% Cu2+ addition achieved higher yield of MPs (104.2 u/mL) in M. purpureus G11, which was only slightly lower than those noted with the addition of 0.1% Mg2+ and 0.2% K+, but did not show any significant difference (p > 0.05). Based on these results, Cu2+ was selected as the optimal exogenous metal ion additive for achieving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11.
Subsequently, the optimal Cu2+ concentration for achieving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 was determined by adding different concentrations of Cu2+ (0.001%, 0.003%, 0.005%, 0.007%, and 0.009%) to the culture medium. The blank control comprised M. purpureus G11 culture medium without Cu2+ addition. As shown in Figure 3b, the yield of MPs decreased with the increase in Cu2+ concentration, and the highest yield of MPs (105.86 u/mL) was achieved with the addition of 0.003% Cu2+. Similarly, the SP activity decreased with the increase in Cu2+ concentration, and the highest SP activity (335.2 u/mL) was observed in the presence of 0.005% Cu2+. Based on these results, 0.005% Cu2+ was selected as the optimal Cu2+ concentration for subsequent experiments.

3.4. Effects of Vitamins on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11

Based on the results of preliminary experiments, VB1 (0.03% and 0.08%), VB3 (0.03% and 0.08%), VB5 (0.03% and 0.08%), VB6 (0.03% and 0.08%), VB9 (0.07% and 0.1%), EVC (0.03% and 0.05%), and H (0.03% and 0.08%) were selected as exogenous vitamin additives and added to the culture medium to determine their effects on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11. As shown in Figure 4a, vitamins had a significant effect on the production of MPs and SP activity in M. purpureus G11. In particular, 0.03% VB1 and 0.08% VB1 significantly increased SP, reaching 316.5 and 320.21 u/mL, respectively, in comparison with other vitamins (p < 0.05). Similarly, addition of 0.03% VB1 and 0.08% VB1 increased the yield of MPs to 99.16 and 100.09 u/mL, respectively. Therefore, VB1 was selected as the optimal vitamin for achieving high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11.
Subsequently, the optimal concentration of VB1 for obtaining high MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11 was ascertained by adding different concentrations of VB1 (0.01%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.07%, and 0.09%) to the culture medium. The blank control comprised M. purpureus G11 culture medium without VB1 addition. As shown in Figure 4b, the yield of MPs first increased and then decreased with the increasing VB1 concentration. The yield of MPs was the highest (108.7 u/mL) in the presence of 0.05% VB1. Similarly, the SP activity first increased and then decreased with increasing VB1 concentration. The highest SP activity of 341.75 u/mL was achieved with the addition of 0.05% VB1. Therefore, 0.05% VB1 was chosen as the optimal concentration for subsequent experiments.

3.5. Analysis of RSM Results for MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11

Based on the abovementioned results, the four selected medium components (rice powder, peptone, Cu2+, and VB1) were further optimized using response surface Box–Behnken experiments by establishing regression equations between nutrient sources and MPs and SP, with yield of MPs and SP activity employed as response variables. The design and results of the response surface Box–Behnken experiments are presented in Table 2. The quadratic polynomial regression equations for MPs (Y1) and SP (Y2) were fitted using Design-Expert 13 software as follows:
Y1 = −0.4083A − 0.1833B − 1.68C + 0.6417D − 0.25AB + 0.025AC − 0.15AD + 0.575BC + 0.175BD + 0.25CD − 3.89A2 − 4.7B2 − 3.87C2 − 5.76D2,
Y2 = 1.73A + 2.71B + 2.47C + 4.99D − 0.6140AB − 0.0633AC + 0.056AD − 0.1668BC + 0.0167BD + 0.481CD − 8.77A2 − 9.8B2 − 14.6C2 − 17.83D2.
Table 3 shows the variance analysis of the MPs’ regression model using Design-Expert 13 software. Factors C (Cu2+), A2, B2, C2, and D2 had highly significant effects on the yield of MPs (p < 0.01), whereas factor D (VB1) had a significant effect on MPs (p < 0.05). However, factors A (rice powder), B (peptone), AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, and CD had no significant effects on the yield of MPs (p > 0.05). Based on the magnitude of the first-order coefficients in the quadratic regression equation, the order of the factors in terms of their effects on the yield of MPs was Cu2+ > VB1 > rice powder > peptone, with Cu2+ having the most significant effect on the yield of MPs. With the yield of MPs as the response variable, the model presented p < 0.01, indicating that the quadratic equation model was highly significant. Meanwhile, the lack of fit of the model was not significant (p = 0.07 > 0.05), suggesting that the experimental results and mathematical model fitted well, and that the model selection was appropriate. Therefore, this model can be used to predict the test results. The coefficient of determination, R2, of the regression equation was 0.9722, implying that 97.22% of the variation in color value could be attributed to the selected variables.
The ANOVA results of the SP regression model obtained using Design-Expert 13 software are shown in Table 4. Factors B (peptone), C (Cu2+), D (VB1), A2, B2, C2, and D2 had a highly significant effect on SP activity (p < 0.01), whereas factor A (rice powder) had a significant effect on SP activity (p < 0.05). By contrast, factors AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, and CD had no significant effect on SP activity (p > 0.05). Based on the magnitude of the first-order coefficients of the quadratic regression equation, the order of the factors in terms of their effects on SP activity was VB1 > peptone > Cu2+ > rice powder, with VB1 having the greatest effect on SP activity. When the SP activity was used as the response variable, the model presented p < 0.01, indicating that the quadratic equation model was highly significant. At the same time, the lack of fit of the model was not significant (p = 0.97 > 0.05), suggesting that the experimental results and mathematical model fitted well, and that the model was suitable for predicting the test results. The coefficient of determination, R2, of this regression equation was 0.9832, implying that 98.32% of the variation in enzyme activity could be attributed to the selected variables.

3.6. Model Validation and Confirmation

The response surface graph clearly showed the interaction between the different factors, with steeper slope indicating higher impact of the factors on the response value, and shallower slope denoting lower impact of the factors on the response value [38]. Figure 5 illustrates the interactive effects of various factors on the yield of MPs, with steep response surfaces indicating a significant influence of the interaction between factors on the yield of MPs. Figure 6 reveals the interactive effects of various factors on SP activity. The steep response surfaces (Figure 6b–e) implied that the SP activity increased and then decreased with the increasing levels of rice powder and Cu2+, rice powder and VB1, peptone and Cu2+, peptone and VB1, and VB1 and Cu2+, denoting a significant influence of the interaction between factors on SP activity. By contrast, the relatively flat response surface (Figure 6a) suggested that the interaction between peptone and rice powder had little effect on SP activity.
Through optimization using Design-Expert 13 data analysis software, the optimal process parameters for obtaining a high yield of MPs and SP activity in M. purpureus G11 were determined to be 6.008% rice powder, 1.021% peptone, 0.0049% Cu2+, and 0.052% VB1. Under these optimal conditions, the theoretical yields of MPs and SP were 113.77 and 362.91 u/mL, respectively. However, considering the operability, the optimal conditions were adjusted to 6% rice powder, 1% peptone, 0.005% Cu2+, and 0.05% VB1, and the adjusted parameters were validated through experiments. The MPs and SP under these adjusted conditions were 112.61 and 365.12 u/mL, respectively, which were close to the theoretical predicted values, indicating that the equation obtained through RSM optimization had practical significance and that the model can correctly predict the production of MPs and SP activity in M. purpureus G11.

4. Conclusions

SP activity is one of the most important indicators for assessing the quality and brewing process of HQ. The SP directly determines the utilization rate of raw materials and yield of HQ wine. Monascus is one of the key fungal genera that affects the saccharification ability and color of HQ. The difference in the SP activity and production of MPs can lead to variations in the characteristics of HQ, which in turn can affect its fermentation quality. In this study, different medium compositions were examined using single-factor experiments to select the optimal concentrations of medium components for liquid-state fermentation. RSM revealed that the optimum medium components for achieving a high yield of MPs and SP activity were 6.008% rice powder, 1.021% peptone, 0.0049% Cu2+, and 0.052% VB1, which were verified by a liquid-state fermentation experiment. Under these optimal conditions, the yield of MPs and SP activity of 112.61 and 365.12 u/mL, respectively, were achieved. The results of this study provide systematic technical support for HQ production and further research on solid-state fermentation technology. Moreover, exploration and development of production technology for achieving high-quality standardized HQ can offer a theoretical basis and technical guarantee for upgrading the products in HQ-related industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.; methodology, J.C.; validation, Q.C.; investigation, Q.C.; resources, Y.H.; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.H.; visualization, C.Y.; project administration, C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31901803 to Y.H.), the Public Scientific Research Program of Fujian Province, China (No. 2022R1032002 to Y.H.; No. 2021R10320012 to C.Y.), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (No. 2023J01200 to Y.H.), and the Project of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. CYPT202207 to C.Y.).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to all the participants in the present research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, Y.Y.; Liang, Z.C.; Lin, X.Z.; He, Z.G.; Ren, X.Y.; Li, W.X.; Molnar, I. Fungal community diversity and fermentation characteristics in regional varieties of traditional fermentation starters for Hong Qu glutinous rice wine. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shao, Y.; Lei, M.; Mao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, F. Insights into Monascus biology at the genetic level. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 3911–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shin, H.M.; Lim, J.W.; Shin, C.G.; Shin, C.S. Comparative characteristics of rice wine fermentations using Monascus koji and rice nuruk. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, J.Z.; Lin, J.; Ye, X.Y.; Xu, M.A.; Li, W.J.; Deng, X.Z. Study on the liquid fermentation conditions of glucoamylase by Monascus purpureus. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, C.L.; Wu, X.P.; Chen, B.; Deng, S.S.; Chen, Z.E.; Huang, Y.Y.; Jin, S.S. Comparative analysis of genetic polymorphisms among Monascus strains by ISSR and RAPD markers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Agboyibor, C.; Kong, W.; Chen, D.; Zhang, A.; Niu, S. Monascus pigments production, composition, bioactivity and its application: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, W.; Qian, M.; Dong, H.; Liu, X.; Bai, W.; Liu, G.; Lv, X. Effect of Hong Qu on the flavor and quality of Hakka yellow rice wine (Huangjiu) produced in Southern China. LWT 2022, 160, 113264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, X.; Ren, X.; Huang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, W.; Su, H.; He, Z. Regional characteristics and discrimination of the fermentation starter Hong Qu in traditional rice wine brewing. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 5664–5673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, S.; Huang, Y.Y.; Yang, C.L. Research status and prospect of brewing Hongqu. China Brew. 2022, 41, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang, Z.R.; Guo, W.L.; Zhou, W.B.; Li, L.; Xu, J.X.; Hong, J.L.; Liu, H.P.; Zeng, F.; Bai, W.D.; Liu, B.; et al. Microbial communities and volatile metabolites in different traditional fermentation starters used for Hong Qu glutinous rice wine. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lv, X.; Zhu, X.; Chen, L.; Ni, L. Comparison study of the volatile profiles and microbial communities of Wuyi Qu and Gutian Qu, two major types of traditional fermentation starters of Hong Qu glutinous rice wine. Food Microbiol. 2018, 69, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, G.M.; Huang, Z.R.; Wu, L.; Wu, Q.; Guo, W.L.; Zhao, W.H.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Rao, P.F.; Lv, X.C.; et al. Microbial diversity and flavor of Chinese rice wine (Huangjiu): An overview of current research and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 42, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padmavathi, T.; Rashmi, D.; Anusha, J.; Umme, S. Partial purification and characterization of amylase enzyme under solid state fermentation from Monascus sanguineus. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, M.; Yang, L.R.; Xu, G.; Wu, J.P. Screening, purification and characterization of a novel cold-active and organic solvent-tolerant lipase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CGMCC 4254. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yumiko, Y.; Tomoka, S.; Kazunori, T.; Hisanori, T.; Kiyoshi, I.; Yoshihiro, S. Characterization of glucoamylase and α-amylase from Monascus anka: Enhanced production of α-amylase in red koji. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 670–674. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, W.; Sun, B. Discovery and development of a novel short-chain fatty acid ester synthetic biocatalyst under aqueous phase from Monascus purpureus isolated from Baijiu. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 128025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Chen, W.; Chen, F.; Li, M. Cloning, expression and characterization of a novel cold-active and organic solvent-tolerant esterase from Monascus ruber M7. Extrem. Life Under Extrem. Cond. 2016, 20, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yasuda, M.; Tachibana, S.; Kuba-Miyara, M. Biochemical aspects of red koji and tofuyo prepared using Monascus fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2012, 96, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tachibana, S.; Yasuda, M. Purification and characterization of heterogeneous glucoamylases from Monascus purpureus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 2573–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Zeng, C.; Yoshizaki, Y.; Yin, X.; Wang, Z.; Okutsu, K.; Futagami, T.; Tamaki, H.; Takamine, K. Additional moisture during koji preparation contributes to the pigment production of red koji (Monascus-fermented rice) by influencing gene expression. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Raveendran, S.; Parameswaran, B.; Ummalyma, S.B.; Abraham, A.; Mathew, A.K.; Madhavan, A.; Rebello, S.; Pandey, A. Applications of microbial enzymes in food industry. Food Technol. Biotech. 2018, 56, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tong, A.; Lu, J.; Huang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Farag, M.A.; Liu, B.; Zhao, C. Comparative transcriptomics discloses the regulatory impact of carbon/nitrogen fermentation on the biosynthesis of Monascus kaoliang pigments. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, Y.Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, C.L.; Lu, D.H. A review on metabolism regulation methods of pigment and citrinin in Monascus. China Condiment 2018, 43, 188–194. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, D.C.; Qiang, X.H.; Huang, Y.Q.; Wang, W.P. Effect of Cu2+, Fe2+ and Fe3+ on the yield of Monascus pigments. China Food Addit. 2017, 4, 100–102. [Google Scholar]
  25. Desai, K.M.; Survase, S.A.; Saudagar, P.S.; Lele, S.S.; Singhal, R.S. Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in fermentation media optimization: Case study of fermentative production of scleroglucan. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 41, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Daud, N.S.; Azam, Z.M.; Othman, N.Z. Optimization of medium compositions and functional characteristics of exopolysaccharide from Paenibacillus polymyxa ATCC 824. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 49, 102656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Y.; Yang, C.; Molnar, I.; Chen, S. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of key genes involved in citrinin biosynthesis in Monascus purpureus. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shang, X.P.; Xu, S.J.; Chen, L.H.Z.; Chen, L.J. Research progress and prospect of submerged fermentation of functional Monascus. Food Ferment. Ind. 2022, 48, 320–327. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang, X.; Qiu, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Ren, J.; Lu, D.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, B. A mutant of Monascus purpureus obtained by carbon ion beam irradiation yielded yellow pigments using various nitrogen sources. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2023, 162, 110121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Embaby, A.M.; Hussein, M.N.; Hussein, A. Monascus orange and red pigments production by Monascus purpureus ATCC16436 through co-solid state fermentation of corn cob and glycerol: An eco-friendly environmental low cost approach. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e207755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Said, F.M.; Brooks, J.; Chisti, Y. Optimal C: N ratio for the production of red pigments by Monascus ruber. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, W.; Chen, R.; Liu, Q.; He, Y.; He, K.; Ding, X.; Kang, L.; Guo, X.; Xie, N.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Orange, red, yellow: Biosynthesis of azaphilone pigments in Monascus fungi. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4917–4925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Patrovsky, M.; Sinovska, K.; Branska, B.; Patakova, P. Effect of initial pH, different nitrogen sources, and cultivation time on the production of yellow or orange Monascus purpureus pigments and the mycotoxin citrinin. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3494–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Guang, H.W.; Liu, T.T.; Chen, L.; Xu, G.R.; Zhang, B.B. Optimization of conditions for producing natural yellow pigment by submerged fermentation of Monascus sp. Food Ferment. Ind. 2020, 46, 150–156. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shi, K.; Song, D.; Chen, G.; Pistolozzi, M.; Wu, Z.; Quan, L. Controlling composition and color characteristics of Monascus pigments by pH and nitrogen sources in submerged fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2015, 120, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, S.N.; Gao, M.X.; Liu, Y.B. Regulatory effect of 5 metal lons on the spectrum of major secondary metabolites of Monascus purpureus. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2021, 42, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, H.H.; Yang, F.; Li, J.Z.; Wang, X.F.; Xue, Y.B.; Chen, M.H.; Wang, C.L. Screening and identification of high-yield esterase Monascus and the enzymatic property. China Brew. 2019, 38, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kalil, S.J.; Maugeri, F.; Rodrigues, M.I. Response surface analysis and simulation as a tool for bioprocess design and optimization. Process Biochem. 2000, 35, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of different carbon sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of different carbon sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fermentation 09 00696 g001
Figure 2. Effects of different nitrogen sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of different nitrogen sources on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e and f) in the figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fermentation 09 00696 g002
Figure 3. Effects of (a) different inorganic salts and (b) Cu2+ concentrations on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h) in the same figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of (a) different inorganic salts and (b) Cu2+ concentrations on MPs and SP in M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h) in the same figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fermentation 09 00696 g003
Figure 4. Effect of (a) vitamins and (b) different concentrations of VB1 on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h) in the same figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of (a) vitamins and (b) different concentrations of VB1 on MPs and SP by M. purpureus G11. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h) in the same figure indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Fermentation 09 00696 g004
Figure 5. Response surface diagram of the influence of factors interaction (A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: CuSO4; D: VB1) on the response of the yield of MPs.
Figure 5. Response surface diagram of the influence of factors interaction (A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: CuSO4; D: VB1) on the response of the yield of MPs.
Fermentation 09 00696 g005
Figure 6. Response surface diagram of the influence of factors interaction (A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: CuSO4; D: VB1) on the response of on SP activity.
Figure 6. Response surface diagram of the influence of factors interaction (A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: CuSO4; D: VB1) on the response of on SP activity.
Fermentation 09 00696 g006
Table 1. Factors and their code levels optimized using RSM experimental design.
Table 1. Factors and their code levels optimized using RSM experimental design.
Independent FactorsSymbolRange and Code Levels
−101
Rice powder (%)A567
Peptone (%)B0.511.5
Cu2+ (%)C0.0030.0050.007
VB1 (%)D0.030.050.07
Table 2. Design and results of response surface Box–Behnken experiments.
Table 2. Design and results of response surface Box–Behnken experiments.
No.Rice Powder/%Peptone/%Cu2+/%VB1/%Observed MP Yield/(u/mL)Observed SP Activity/(u/mL)
150.50.0050.05106.4339.56
270.50.0050.05105.6344.63
351.50.0050.05106.2347.17
471.50.0050.05104.4349.78
5610.0030.03106.5323.66
6610.0070.03102.5327.63
7610.0030.07106.2334.25
8610.0070.07103.2340.14
9510.0050.03103.1329.45
10710.0050.03103.2332.64
11510.0050.07105.7338.16
12710.0050.07105.2341.57
1360.50.0030.05107.5332.72
1461.50.0030.05106.2337.80
1560.50.0070.05103.4337.84
1661.50.0070.05104.4342.25
17510.0030.05107.5334.42
18710.0030.05106.5337.80
19510.0070.05103.8339.63
20710.0070.05102.9342.76
2160.50.0050.03102.1327.04
2261.50.0050.03101.5332.16
2360.50.0050.07103.1336.59
2461.50.0050.07103.2341.77
25610.0050.05113.42364.15
26610.0050.05114.2365.86
27610.0050.05113.5360.85
28610.0050.05113.2364.26
29610.0050.05114.2358.13
Table 3. ANOVA results of the MPs’ regression model.
Table 3. ANOVA results of the MPs’ regression model.
SourceSum SqDfMean SqF Valuep ValueSignificant
Model405.761428.9834.93<0.0001**
A2122.410.1428
B0.403310.40330.48610.4971
C3413440.98<0.0001**
D4.9414.945.950.0286*
AB0.2510.250.30130.5917
AC0.002510.00250.0030.957
AD0.0910.090.10850.7468
BC1.3211.321.590.2274
BD0.122510.12250.14760.7066
CD0.2510.250.30130.5917
A297.92197.92118.02<0.0001**
B2143.151143.15172.54<0.0001**
C297.29197.29117.26<0.0001**
D2215.231215.23259.41<0.0001**
Residual11.62140.8297
Lack-of-fit10.75101.074.950.0685
Pure error0.868340.2171
Cor. total417.3828
Note: **, highly significantly different (p < 0.01), * significantly different (p < 0.05). A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: Cu2+; D: VB1.
Table 4. ANOVA results of the SP regression model.
Table 4. ANOVA results of the SP regression model.
SourceSum SqDFMean SqF Valuep ValueSignificant
Model3621.3214258.6758.41<0.0001**
A36.01136.018.130.0128*
B88.23188.2319.920.0005**
C73.08173.0816.50.0012**
D298.981298.9867.51<0.0001**
AB1.5111.510.34050.5688
AC0.01610.0160.00360.9529
AD0.012510.01250.00280.9583
BC0.111210.11120.02510.8763
BD0.001110.00110.00020.9877
CD0.925410.92540.2090.6546
A2498.871498.87112.65<0.0001**
B2623.571623.57140.81<0.0001**
C21383.411383.4312.39<0.0001**
D22063.0812063.08465.88<0.0001**
Residual62144.43
Lack-of-fit23.23102.320.23960.9696
Pure error38.7749.69
Cor. total3683.3228
Note: **, highly significantly different (p < 0.01), * significantly different (p < 0.05). A: Rice powder; B: Peptone; C: Cu2+; D: VB1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, C. Effects of Main Nutrient Sources on Improving Monascus Pigments and Saccharifying Power of Monascus purpureus in Submerged Fermentation. Fermentation 2023, 9, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070696

AMA Style

Huang Y, Chen J, Chen Q, Yang C. Effects of Main Nutrient Sources on Improving Monascus Pigments and Saccharifying Power of Monascus purpureus in Submerged Fermentation. Fermentation. 2023; 9(7):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yingying, Jiashi Chen, Qing Chen, and Chenglong Yang. 2023. "Effects of Main Nutrient Sources on Improving Monascus Pigments and Saccharifying Power of Monascus purpureus in Submerged Fermentation" Fermentation 9, no. 7: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070696

APA Style

Huang, Y., Chen, J., Chen, Q., & Yang, C. (2023). Effects of Main Nutrient Sources on Improving Monascus Pigments and Saccharifying Power of Monascus purpureus in Submerged Fermentation. Fermentation, 9(7), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop