Next Article in Journal
Identifying Fire Blight-Resistant Malus sieversii Rootstocks Grafted with Cultivar ‘Aport’ Using Monitoring Data
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Analyses Defined the Interplay between Two Major Loci Controlling the Fruit Texture Performance in a Norwegian Apple Collection (Malus × domestica Borkh.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of Different Sweet Olive Cultivars with Different Ripening Degrees Grown in the Puglia Region, Southeastern Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Underutilized Edible Tree Species of the Philippines

1
Department of Crop Science and Agroforestry, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Food Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
4
Institute of Crop Science and Institute of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines
5
Philippine Root Crop Research and Training Center (PhilRootcrops), Visayas State University, Baybay 6521, Leyte, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1051; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101051
Submission received: 27 August 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 28 September 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024

Abstract

:
Recently, neglected and underutilized species (NUS) have deservedly come to the forefront of scientific interest because they can contribute to the human nutrition, due to the content of bioactive substances such as antioxidants. Despite the great diversity and rich tradition in the use of Philippine NUS, the nutritional properties of many edible plants remain unexplored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate various parts of eleven NUS fruits and vegetables traditionally consumed in the Philippines, namely Allaeanthus luzonicus, Canarium ovatum, Dillenia philippinensis, Ficus pseudopalma, Flacourtia indica, Flacourtia inermis, Garcinia intermedia, Heliotropium arboreum, Posoqueria latifolia, Stelechocarpus burahol, and Sterculia quadrifida for their total phenolic content (TPC) and in vitro antioxidant activity (DPPH and ORAC assays). Inflorescence of A. luzonicus (DPPH IC50 = 91.0 μg/mL, ORAC IC50 = 37.9 μg/mL) and fruit of S. burahol (DPPH IC50 = 253.7 μg/mL, ORAC IC50 = 32.2 μg/mL) showed the strongest antioxidant activity in both assays. These two species also had the highest TPC (202.1 and 133.0 µg GAE/mg extract, respectively). For all samples tested, a strong correlation was found between TPC and antioxidant activity. Based on our results, A. luzonicus and S. burahol have promising potential as novel antioxidant rich food.

1. Introduction

It is well known that oxidative stress is involved in the development of various human non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular conditions and cancer, the incidence of which has been on the rise in recent years [1]. In the Philippines, NCDs account for 68% of all deaths and the probability of premature death (before the age of 70) from one of the four main NCDs (cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes) is 29% [2]. Several studies have shown that a plant-based diet can reduce the risk of the development of NCDs [3]. This is likely due to the high content of various biologically active compounds collectively called antioxidants, that can inhibit or prevent oxidative injury to vulnerable molecules in living systems. Antioxidants operate on variety of levels, e.g., they can bind with reactive oxygen species and neutralize them. They also act as scavengers by preventing cell and tissue damage from free radicals or helping with adaptation to oxidative stress. Several preclinical and clinical studies have already proven the effectiveness of antioxidants in the management of different NCDs, mainly due to their anti-aging, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, hepato-, and neuroprotective effects [4,5]. Vitamins, carotenoids, and phenols are the most well-known natural antioxidants [6]. Phenolic compounds are mainly biosynthesized through the shikimic acid pathway from phenylalanine or tyrosine, and the hydroxyl group on the benzene ring is responsible for their antioxidant properties [7]. In recent years, many scientific studies have confirmed the strong antioxidant effect of some phenolic compounds, as reviewed by San Miguel-Chávez [8]. Among them, especially flavonoids are highlighted as the most potent plant antioxidants, together with tannins, chalcones, coumarins, and phenolic acids. Several synthetic antioxidants are available today that have certain advantages, mainly their stability. However, consumers have a stronger preference for natural antioxidants especially due to their lower side effects and naturalorigin [5,8,9].
Neglected and underutilized species (NUS) have been used for centuries for food and other purposes, but their use and importance have diminished over time. Currently, only a fraction of the possible edible species is consumed worldwide, and much of it remains underutilized despite their immense potential. However, with the changing demand for plant and crop traits, NUS are considered as potential future food crops that can contribute to improved nutrition, dietary diversity, and human health. In addition to the NUS ability to boost the diet, their benefits also lie in their environmental friendliness and resistance to harsh conditions and diseases [10]. Among all, no other crops are so positively perceived by society as fruits and vegetables. They are undisputable components of a healthy human diet, containing various kind of antioxidants. It is already known that their increased daily intake may reduce the risk of NCD development, which is the number one cause of death worldwide [11]. Given this fact, the WHO recommended consuming at least 400 g of fruit and vegetables to prevent NCDs, whereby fruit should represent one third (meaning approximately 140 g) [12]. However, most of the world’s population is well below this threshold, especially in less developed countries. In recent years, the term “superfruits” has emerged and is receiving increasing attention as a marketing strategy to promote NUS with extraordinary health benefits, precisely in conjunction with their high antioxidant activity. Acai berry (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) or the goji berry (Lycium chinense Mill.), whose various products are now popular worldwide, are among the most well-known superfruits rich in antioxidants [13,14]. However, there is still a huge number of lesser-known fruits and vegetables, which antioxidant potency has not been evaluated yet.
The Philippines, consisting of more than 7000 islets, is probably the most biologically diverse country in the world with the endemism rate of plants estimated to be 39%; however, for certain taxa, it can be even higher [15,16]. Although it is home to an incredible range of species, rice and cereals comprise almost half of the total one-day per capita food intake, while fruits and vegetables lag behind [17]. Furthermore, fruit consumption in the Philippines has declined significantly over the past twenty-five years, from 188 g in 1996 to 93 g in 2021, far below the recommended daily intake of fruit, and ranking them 42nd within the group of 165 countries in terms of fruit consumption per capita in 2021 [18]. Similarly, although the mean per capita intake of vegetables is increasing slightly, from 107 g/person/day in 2005 to an estimated 123 g today, it is still less than half of the recommended daily intake [19,20]. Low fruit and vegetable intake can be linked, among other things, to a lack of knowledge about their benefits and recommended daily intake, but also to socio-economic factors and the high price of imported crops [21]. The situation could be improved by increased awareness of locally available species and their inclusion in the daily diet. Nowadays, several local NUS crops and their products are already well established in Philippine markets, e.g., purple yam (Dioscorea alata L.; also known as ube), a root vegetable rich in essential vitamins and minerals and an excellent source of phenolics antioxidants (mainly anthocyanins) [22], or pili nut (Canarium ovatum Engl.), which fruit pulp and seed are edible and contain a considerable amount of essential nutrients, antioxidants, and unsaturated fatty acids [23]. Despite their probable nutritional, health, economic, and ecological importance, many Philippine plant species remain NUS as result of the lack of comprehensive botanical investigation and systematic scientific studies of their nutritional, biological, and chemical properties. Moreover, due to massive deforestation, many species are often threatened with extinction, which can have an adverse effect not only on the ecosystem but also on human well-being [24,25]. Thus, the main aim of the present study was to provide an overview of the antioxidant potential and total phenolic content (TPC) of selected underutilized tree species traditionally consumed as a fruit or vegetable in the Philippines. By uncovering the antioxidant activity and phenolic content of these NUS, we aim to not only enrich the knowledge on the biological effects and chemical composition of Philippine traditional fruits and vegetables, but also raise awareness about their health beneficial properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Based on traditional uses of fruits and vegetables in Filipino cuisine [26,27,28,29], 11 tree species (Figure 1) have been chosen for the evaluation of their antioxidant potential and TPC. The plant samples were collected in May 2017, from 5 collection sites, namely the garden of the Institute of Plant Breeding (IPB) of the University of the Philippines Los Banos (UPLB), Dr. Coronel Fruit Conservation Farm, the Mount Makiling Forest (all Laguna province), Sambawan Island (Biliran province); and from the markets in Metropolitan Manila province. Fresh plant material was air-dried in a shady place for several days and then stored in paper backs until use. Air drying was chosen as it is a traditional method of preserving plant samples and food in general, and also because it is a cheap, simple, and effective method in the field [30]. Plant samples were identified and authenticated by local expert Dr. Pablito M. Magdalita from the IPB UPLB, and ethnobotany experts, Prof. Ladislav Kokoska and Dr. Johana Rondevaldova, from the Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences of the Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (CZU), using the handbook “Important and Underutilized Edible Fruits of the Philippines” [26]. Voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of the Department of Botany and Plant Physiology of the Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources of the CZU. The ethnobotanical data including scientific names of the species, family, local name, plant part tested, voucher specimen number, and traditional edible use are summarized in Table 1. The complete scientific names and authorities were checked in Plants of the World Online [31].

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), (±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), fluorescein sodium salt (FL), and gallic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Prague, Czech Republic). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, and methanol (99.8%) were bought from Penta (Prague, Czech Republic). Na2CO3 and KH2PO4 salts were obtained from Erba Lachema (Brno, Czech Republic), while K2HPO4 was from Lach-Ner (Neratovice, Czech Republic).

2.3. Preparation of Extracts

Crude plant extracts consist of complex mixtures of various classes of phenols that are selectively soluble in various solvents. Thus, the solvent used could affect the final TPC and antioxidant activity of plant extracts. The most widely used solvents for extracting phenolic compounds are water, ethanol, methanol, acetone, and their water mixtures, with acid or not; however, several studies such as of Boeing et al. [32] or Santas et al. [33] revealed that methanol was the most efficient solvent for extraction of antioxidant compounds from fruits and vegetables. Thus, methanol was used as a solvent in the present study. Initially, air-dried plant material was grounded to fine powder using electric mills GM100 (Retsch, Haan, Germany) and Tissue Lyser II (Retsch, Haan, Germany), and 1 g of powder was extracted in 30 mL of 99.8% methanol and left for 24 h to shake in a GFL3005 shaker (GFL, Burgwedel, Germany). Subsequently, the extract was filtered and concentrated to dryness by Rotary evaporator R-200 (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) in a vacuum at 40 °C. Dry residue yield was calculated as follows: extraction yield % = weight of the dry extract after evaporation/weight of the dry plant material used for extraction × 100%. Subsequently, dry residue was dissolved in DMSO to a stock concentration of 51,200 µg/mL, a standard concentration used to create stock solutions for our plant extract repositories which can then be tested in various bioassays, and stored at −20 °C until further analyses. In total, 12 extracts were prepared and the yield of dry residues is part of Table 2.

2.4. Antioxidant Activity Evaluation

Confirming antioxidant activity by more than one method can offer a more complete evaluation of the total antioxidant capacity of individual plants [34]. Thus, we examined antioxidant activity by two methods varying based on the mode of action, the DPPH representing electron atom transfer reaction and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) representing hydrogen transfer assay [35]. Trolox was used as a positive control for both assays. Results were calculated by Gen 5 software, version 3.11 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and expressed as mean values of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) with standard deviation (±SD) in µg/mL. In the initial calculation of the IC50, the acquired data (absorbances for each concentrations; Abs) were transformed to % of inhibition according to the following formula: [(Absblank − Abssample)/Absblank) × 100]. IC50 was then calculated by interpolating 50% inhibition from the dose-response curve using non-linear 4-parameter regression. Considering that most studies classify the strength of antioxidant activity by IC50 as strongly active if the IC50 < 50–100 µg/mL, moderately active if it is 101–250 µg/mL, and weak or inactive if it is > 250 µg/mL, a concentration of 256 µg/mL was chosen as the highest concentration tested by both the ORAC and DPPH method [36,37].

2.4.1. DPPH Assay

The method based on Sharma and Bhat [38] was used to assess the extracts’ ability to inhibit DPPH radical. A two-fold serial dilution of each extract and Trolox was performed in methanol via automatized pipetting platform Freedom Evo 100, equipped with a four-channel liquid handling arm (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) in 96-well microtiter plates. Subsequently, 75 µL of methanol and 25 µL of 1 mM methanol solution of DPPH was added into each tested well of microtiter plate to create a final volume of 200 µL. The final tested concentrations ranged from 0.125 to 256 µg/mL. Plates were incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature, and then absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 517 nm using Cytation 3 Multimode Reader, using Gen5 software, version 3.11 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.4.2. ORAC Assay

The method previously described by Ou et al. [39] and slightly modified by Tauchen et al. [40] and Rondevaldova et al. [41] was used for the evaluation of the ability of the extracts to protect FL from AAPH degradation. Two-fold serial dilution of each extract was prepared in phosphate buffer (75 mM, pH 7.0) in black 96-well microtiter plates using the automated pipetting platform Freedom EVO 100, equipped with a four-channel liquid handling arm (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland). Afterwards, 150 µL of FL (48 nM) was added to each well (except for the outer wells of the plate that were filled with 200 µL of distilled water for better thermal mass stability and not used for evaluation). After 10 min of incubation at 37 °C in Memmert Incubator IF110plus (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany), the reaction was started by adding of 25 µL of freshly prepared AAPH (153 mM). Control (FL with AAPH in phosphate buffer) and blank (FL in phosphate buffer) were part of each microtiter plate. Plates were subsequently incubated for 90 min, and the fluorescence changes were measured by Cytation 3 Multimode Reader, using Gen5 software, version 3.11 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 485 and 528 nm, respectively.

2.5. Determination of TPC

To estimate TPC, a slightly modified method previously described by Singleton et al. [42] was used. The method was adjusted for 96-well microtiter plates. Initially, 100 µL of each extract was mixed with 25 µL of pure Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and submitted to orbital shaking at approximately 500 rpm for 10 min. The reaction was started by adding 75 µL of 12% Na2CO3. The plates were kept in the dark for 2 h at 37 °C. Absorbance was measured at 700 nm by Cytation 3 Multimode Reader using Gen5 software, version 3.11 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Fourteen concentration levels of gallic acid (two-fold dilution in the range from 0.015625 to 126 µg/mL) were used to create the standard calibration curve. The results were expressed as mean values ± SD as gallic acid equivalents (µg GAE/mg extract).

2.6. Statistics and Calculations

All experiments were performed as three independent tests, each carried out in triplicate. Linear correlation coefficients (r) between DPPH, ORAC, and TPC were established using Pearson product-moment correlation in Microsoft Excel 365, version 2409 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The degree of the correlation was interpreted using the guide of Evans [43] as follows (for the absolute value of r): 0–0.19 very weak, 0.20–0.39 weak, 0.40–0.59 moderate, 0.60–0.79 strong, 0.80–1 very strong. The mean values of each analysis (DPPH, ORAC, and TPC) for each plant species were visualized as a heatmap using Euclidean distance for clustering with pheatmap v 1.0.12 in R [44].

3. Results

In total, twelve extracts prepared from eleven NUS of edible trees of the Philippines were evaluated for their antioxidant potential by two different assays (DPPH and ORAC). Moreover, as phenolics are often strongly associated with antioxidant potential, TPC was also determined. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on any antioxidant activity and TPC of Allaeanthus luzonicus inflorescences, Canarium ovatum seeds, Ficus pseudopalma leaves, F. pseudopalma pulp with seeds, Garcinia intermedia fruits, Heliotropium arboreum leaves, Posoqueria latifolia arils, and Sterculia quadrifida seeds. Antioxidant activity represented by values of IC50 and contents of total phenolics determined for tested parts of NUS of edible trees of the Philippines are shown in the Table 2.
In both antioxidant assays, the most active extracts were A. luzonicus inflorescence (IC50 for DPPH and ORAC at 253.7 µg/mL and 32.2 µg/mL, respectively) and Stelechocarpus burahol fruit (IC50 for DPPH and ORAC at 91.0 µg/mL and 37.9 µg/mL, respectively). These two species were also highest in respective TPCs (133.0 and 202.1 µg GAE/mg extract) while the other samples showed much lower TPC values ranging from 16.1 to 55.6 µg GAE/mg extract. No other species could inhibit DPPH even at the highest concentration tested (256 µg/mL). A moderate antioxidant effect was exhibited by F. pseudopalma leaves, F. pseudopalma pulp with seeds, P. latifolia arils, and S. quadrifida seeds in the ORAC assay, with IC50 ranging from 106.7 to 166.7 µg/mL, whereas other species showed only weak or no effect (IC50 ≥ 203.7 µg/mL). In accordance with the widely accepted view that phenolics are highly active antioxidants, we found a very strong correlation between ORAC and TPC, and DPPH and TPC (r = 0.920 and r = 0.825, respectively, both significant at p < 0.05).
Based on the results of DPPH and ORAC assays and TPC analysis, the heatmap visualizes the hierarchical clustering of antioxidant properties in plant species studied, highlighting the differences in antioxidant properties among the NUS of edible trees of the Philippines and providing a visual representation of their potential health benefits (Figure 2). The dendrogram groups the species into two major clusters: one with generally higher antioxidant effects, including A. luzonicus and S. burahol, and a second including all the other species tested showing lower antioxidant properties. S. burahol exhibits high values across all three assessments, indicating its strong antioxidant potential and high phenolic content. A. luzonicus shows high ORAC but low DPPH values, with medium TPC. Species present in the first subcluster of the second cluster such as Ficus pseudopalma (both pulp with seeds and leaves), Flacourtia indica, P. latifolia, and S. quadrifida, display moderate values for ORAC, while having no activity in DPPH and low levels of TPC, suggesting that other compounds than phenolics could be responsible for their antioxidant effect. Species occurring in the second subcluster of the second cluster, including C. ovatum, Dillenia philippinensis, G. intermedia, H. arboreum, and Flacourtia inermis, generally exhibit almost no antioxidant potential with very low TPC.

4. Discussion

Among all NUS tested in this study, the fruit of S. burahol, a tree commonly known as kepel that is naturally found and cultivated in South-East Asia, produced the most potent antioxidant properties. Ripe fruit with juicy pulp is eaten fresh and used in traditional medicine as a diuretic or to prevent kidney inflammation. Interestingly, its consumption gives a pleasant fragrance to body excretions such as urine and sweat [29]. Several studies have already evaluated the antioxidant activity of S. burahol, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted using ORAC assay. Herlina et al. [45] reported strong inhibitory activity of the fruit methanol extract on DPPH with IC50 7.5 µg/mL and TPC of 58.3 µg GAE, which is in accordance with our study showing also a quite strong ability to inhibit DPPH radical corresponding with one of the highest TPC from all tested samples. Similarly, Sundari et al. [46] observed that ethyl acetate and methanol extracts obtained from fruit flesh of this species produced very strong antioxidant effect against DPPH (IC50 19.3 and 12.0 µg/mL, respectively). Subsequent chemical analysis revealed that one of the main constituents is epigallocatechin gallate, a polyphenolic antioxidant naturally occurring in tea. Moreover, the study of Ismail et al. [47] confirmed the beneficial effect of S. burahol fruit extract in vivo on oxidative stress in the serum, liver, heart, and brain of high-fat diet-fed rats.
A. luzonicus, an endemic tree of the Philippines naturally occurring in lowland thickets and forests, is the species that showed the second strongest antioxidant properties among all samples tested in this study. Its inflorescences are consumed as a favorite indigenous vegetable mainly in northern Philippines in various traditional Filipino dishes such as ‘pinakbet’ (vegetable stew) or ‘bulanglang’ (vegetable soup) [48]. According to Antonio and Galacgac [49], this species is seasonal in availability with a distinct flowering season from June to March; however, off-season varieties producing flowers in other months also exist. The genus Allaeanthus contains only four accepted species and is very closely related to the genus Broussonetia; moreover, A. luzonicus is more commonly known by the synonym Broussonetia luzonica [31,50]. In the present study, the antioxidant potential of its inflorescences was analyzed for the first time and the results showed interesting antioxidant potential in both DPPH and ORAC assays. On the other hand, there are several studies focused on the antioxidant activity of other species from genus Broussonetia, as reviewed by Wang et al. [51]. For example, Sun et al. [52] described B. papyrifera fruits as a promising species to prevent oxidation and its antioxidant activity was positively correlated with their TPC. Previous phytochemical investigation of species in genus Broussonetia revealed that B. kazinoki, B. papyrifera, and B. zeylanica contain alkaloids and phenols, mainly phenolic acids and flavonoids (many of them are prenylated) belonging to the diphenylpropane, chalcone, flavan, flavanone, flavone, flavonol, and aurone classes [53]. Some of these compounds such as 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, dihydroconiferyl alcohol, ferulic acid, and curculigoside C have demonstrated the ability to inhibit DPPH with IC50 ranging between 39.5–65.6 μM [54].
In the contrast to our findings, D. philippinensis, F. indica, and F. inermis showed antioxidative properties in previous studies. For example, Barcelo [55] mentioned D. philippinensis fruit as the most active out of 31 edible wild fruits from Benguet province, Philippines. On the other hand, he detected one of the lowest TPC, being in accordance with our results. The difference in results of antioxidant activity between the present study and the study of Barcelo can be caused by fruit processing before evaluation, as in our study we evaluated methanol extract prepared from air-dried plant material, however, Barcelo extracted fresh samples directly. Several previous studies rate various Flacourtia species quite positively for their antioxidant properties. For example, Alakolanga et al. [56] showed moderate antioxidant activity of F. inermis in the DPPH assay with an IC50 value of 66.2 µg/mL. Similarly, Perera et al. [57] reported an IC50 for DPPH assay of 89 µg/mL and TPC of 8.1 mg GAE/g for fruit of F. indica. In addition, Selim et al. [58] found that F. indica fruit extract can significantly prevent kidney dysfunction in rats caused by oxidative stress. Ripe fruits of F. indica and F. inermis have previously been identified as rich sources of phenolic antioxidants such as quercetin, rutin, and esculin [56]. However, our study showed no antioxidant activity of these two species in the DPPH assay and only weak activity for ORAC, along with relatively low TPC content. These differences are probably due to the different method of processing the plant material (fresh fruit vs. extract prepared from dried plant material) or different extraction solvents used (ethanol vs. methanol).
Although S. burahol fruit is commonly available and consumed out of hand in Indonesia [29], and A. luzonicus inflorescences are traditionally used for the preparation of various Filipinos meals [48], little is known about their possible antinutritive properties. In general, antinutritional factors in fruits and vegetables like phytic acid, tannins, and oxalates can indeed reduce the bioavailability of phenolic compounds and antioxidants, potentially diminishing the health benefits of NUS. These compounds bind to minerals and other nutrients, making absorption less efficient. Since some minerals, particularly iron, copper, magnesium, selenium, and zinc, are indispensable for maintaining the activity of several essential antioxidant enzymes, it is important to be aware of the possible presence of antinutrients that reduce their bioavailability and thus limit their role in promoting health. Balancing antinutrients and essential minerals is key to optimizing the nutritional value of these plants [59]. However, traditional processing methods such as soaking, fermentation, and sprouting have been shown to reduce the levels of these antinutrients and improve nutrient bioavailability. Heat treatments, including boiling and roasting, can also help in reducing phytic acid and tannins [60]. However, no study has yet investigated the presence of these substances in the above-mentioned species. On the other hand, it is typical for the Annonaceae family (which includes S. burahol) that the seeds of many fruits (e.g., Annona genus) are irritants and slightly toxic due to the content of various antinutrients such as acetogenins [61,62]. Thus, the seeds should be avoided when the fruit is consumed.
The degree of antioxidant activity and chemical composition, including phenolic content, can generally be influenced by various factors. In addition to the genotype of the plant, soil, seasonal and climatic factors, geography, and sampling and processing all influence the content and therefore the bioactivity [63]. Seasonal factors such as temperature, rainfall, and sunlight can alter the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds. For example, plants grown during periods of higher sunshine may have a higher phenolic content due to increased exposure to UV light, which stimulates the production of protective antioxidants [64]. Soil, altitude, and climate also play an important role. Plants grown in nutrient-rich soils or at higher altitudes may accumulate more phenolic compounds and show higher antioxidant activity [65]. These environmental differences highlight the importance of taking both seasonality and location into account when assessing the nutritional quality of NUS. Thus, further research on the effect of location on the content of bioactive compounds in A. luzonicus and S. burahol could help to optimize cultivation strategies to potentially increase phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. When it comes to the processing of plant material, there are several techniques, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Air drying is a simple, cost-effective, and energy-efficient method that has been traditionally used in the processing of herbs and various agricultural products. The biggest limitations of this method are the possible contamination and infestation, the slow process, and the exposure to oxygen, which can lead to degradation of some bioactive compounds [30]. In contrast, modern freeze drying (also known as lyophilization) preserves these compounds better due to low temperatures and minimal oxidation. Although freeze drying offers better preservation, it requires expensive specialized equipment, is energy intensive, and less practical for field work [66]. Air drying is simpler and more practical for large-scale or low-cost applications, and its simplicity and availability is a major benefit, despite the potential loss in preservation of bioactive compounds [30]. Moreover, processes such as cooking, fermentation, or soaking, that are generally applied to prolong the shelf life of food, including fruits and vegetables, can significantly influence the antioxidant potential and chemical composition. Cooking, particularly at high temperatures, may degrade heat-sensitive antioxidants like certain phenolic compounds, but it can also enhance the bioavailability of others by rupturing cell walls and releasing bound phenolics [67]. Fermentation can increase the antioxidant potential by various ways, e.g., by promoting the growth of beneficial microorganisms (mainly Lactobacillus strains) that convert complex phenolic compounds into more bioavailable forms, or by the activity of the fermentation-produced enzymes that can mobilize bound phenolics into their free form [68]. Soaking can reduce antinutritional factors that bind antioxidants, thus improving their absorption, but prolonged soaking may also lead to the leaching of some water-soluble antioxidants [69]. Overall, these processing methods can either enhance or reduce the levels of bioactive compounds depending on the technique and duration used.
Despite the recognized importance of NUS for food and nutrition security, biodiversity conservation, and environmental and socioeconomic benefits, these crops are still not sufficiently utilized in agricultural systems [70]. Incorporating underutilized tree species with antioxidant properties, such as A. luzonicus and S. burahol, into agroforestry systems in the Philippines can bring many benefits, as they will contribute to the healthy diets of local populations, and will increase sustainability of agricultural production in the region [10]. S. burahol is already well established on some plantations in Indonesia, especially on the island of Java. However, its cultivation remains limited to home gardens in the Philippines [71]. A. luzonicus is an indigenous tree that thrives all around the Philippines, but it is consumed only in some parts of Luzon Island [49]. Therefore, appropriate production and processing technologies should be developed for successful introduction of antioxidant-rich food products derived from A. luzonicus and S. burahol to the market in the Philippines. Public health campaigns can raise awareness of the nutritional benefits of these plants and encourage consumers to include them in their daily diets. Another option is school feeding programs to introduce children to these beneficial NUS and encourage their inclusion in their regular eating habits. S. burahol is already very popular in Indonesia, especially for its strong aromatic taste. Due to its pleasant fruity flavor and its relatively high edible content (60%), this fruit seems to be a suitable healthy snack for children [72,73]. Farmers and the local food industry can also play a role by developing value-added products that make these species more attractive but also more accessible to consumers. In addition, research institutions should support studies on their agronomic potential and nutritional value and provide data to support their promotion. Government policies that promote biodiversity and provide resources to farmers can facilitate the transition to more diverse farming systems. In addition, maintaining the genetic diversity of these species through seed banks will ensure their long-term viability. Together, these strategies can promote better nutrition, agricultural sustainability, and food security [74,75].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study evaluates the antioxidant potential and TPC of extracts from eleven NUS of edible trees from the Philippines, many of which were analyzed here for the first time. Our findings reveal significant differences in antioxidant activity among species, with the inflorescence of A. luzonicus and the fruits of S. burahol showing the highest antioxidant potential in both DPPH and ORAC assays and the highest TPC values. These results underline the potential of these species, especially A. luzonicus and S. burahol, as promising sources of natural antioxidants. The strong correlation between TPC and antioxidant activity in tested species supports the widely held view that phenolic compounds are key contributors to antioxidant properties. This study increases the knowledge of the antioxidant potential of Philippine NUS, and highlights their potential health benefits. Further research should be focused on the detailed determination of the nutritional composition of A. luzonicus and S. burahol, especially on the isolation and characterization of specific bioactive compounds responsible for their antioxidant activity, but also on the verification of their safety profile regarding the possible content of antinutrients. In the future, the key findings of this study could lead to the discovery of new antioxidants and development of novel food and agricultural products with antioxidant properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R. and L.K.; methodology, J.R. and J.T. (Jan Tauchen); investigation, J.R., J.T. (Jan Tauchen), J.T. (Jana Tulkova) and A.M.; resources, E.E.T. and P.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.R.; writing—review and editing, J.R., J.T. (Jan Tauchen), J.T. (Jana Tulkova), A.M., P.M.M., E.E.T. and L.K.; visualization, J.R. and A.M.; supervision, L.K.; funding acquisition, L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences (IGA 20243109).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in the Philippines: The Case for Investment; World Health Organization: Geneve, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clem, J.; Barthel, B. A look at plant-based diets. Mo. Med. 2021, 118, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Arias, A.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T. Exploring the potential of antioxidants from fruits and vegetables and strategies for their recovery. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 77, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ayoka, T.O.; Ezema, B.E.; Eze, C.N.; Nnadi, C.O. Antioxidants for the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases. J. Explor. Res. Pharmacol. 2022, 7, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arshiya, S. The antioxidant effect of certain fruits: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013, 5, 265–268. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeb, A. Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods: A review. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. San Miguel-Chavez, R. Phenolic antioxidant capacity: A review. In Phenolic Compounds—Biological Activity; Soto-Hernandez, M., Palma-Tenango, M., Garcia-Mateos, R., Eds.; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 86, 345–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Talucder, M.S.A.; Ruba, U.B.; Robi, A.S. Potentiality of neglected and underutilized species (NUS) as a future resilient food: A systematic review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 16, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption to Reduce the Risk of Noncommunicable Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/fruit-vegetables-ncds (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  12. World Health Organization. Fruit and Vegetables for Health: Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan; World Health Organization: Geneve, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang, S.K.; Alasalvar, C.; Shahidi, F. Superfruits: Phytochemicals, antioxidant efficacies, and health effects—A comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1580–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.; Xu, D.; Chen, S.; Yuan, F.; Mao, L.; Gao, Y. Superfruits in China: Bioactive phytochemicals and their potential health benefits—A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 6892–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lasco, R.D.; Pulhin, F.B. Forest land use change in the Philippines and climate change mitigation. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2000, 5, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Langenberger, G.; Martin, K.; Sauerborn, J. Vascular plant species inventory of a Philippine lowland rain forest and its conservation value. In Forest Diversity and Management, 1st ed.; Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 211–241. [Google Scholar]
  17. Capanzana, M.V. Fruits and vegetables for health: The health and nutrition situation of the Philippines. In Proceedings of the Fruits and Vegetables for Health Workshop: Enhancing Production and Consumption of Safe and High-Quality Fruits and Vegetables, Pacific Hall Convention and Exhibition Center (COEX), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 15–16 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fruit Consumption per Capita in Philippines. Available online: https://www.helgilibrary.com/indicators/fruit-consumption-per-capita/philippines/ (accessed on 22 June 2024).
  19. Batt, P.J. The Vegetable Industry in the Philippines; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singian, R. Market Brief on Processed Vegetables—Report; USDA Foreign Agricultural Service: Manila, Philippines, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonzales, G.N.; Barrion, A.S.A.; Lanorio, M.C.L. Knowledge and consumption of fruits and vegetables of selected public and private senior high school students in Imus city, Cavite. Acta Med. Philipp. 2024, 58, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Chandrasekara, A.; Kumar, T.J. Roots and tuber crops as functional foods: A review on phytochemical constituents and their potential health benefits. Int. J. Food Sci. 2016, 2016, 3631647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Endonela, L.E.; Gentallan, R.P., Jr.; Timog, E.B.S.; Bartolome, M.C.B.; Altoveros, N.C.; Borromeo, T.H.; Alercia, A.; Lopez, F.; Cerutti, A.L. Key Descriptors for Pili Nut (Canarium ovatum Engl.); UPLB and FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Adla, K.; Dejan, K.; Neira, D.; Dragana, S. Degradation of ecosystems and loss of ecosystem services. In One Health, 1st ed.; Prata, J.C., Ribeiro, A.I., Rocha-Santos, T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 281–327. [Google Scholar]
  25. Salvi, J.; Katewa, S.S. A review: Underutilized wild edible plants as a potential source of alternative nutrition. Int. J. Botany Stud. 2016, 1, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  26. Coronel, R.E. Important and Underutilized Edible Fruits of the Philippines, 1st ed.; University of Philippines Los Banos Foundation Incorporated: Los Banos, Philippines, 2011; 283p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Siemonsma, J.S.; Piluek, K. Plant Resources of South East Asia 8: Vegetables, 1st ed.; Pudoc Scientific Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1993; 413p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Magdalita, P.M.; San Pascual, A.O.; Dizon, E.I.; Coronel, R.E. Phenotypic evaluation of neglected and underutilized fruit species in the Philippines and their potential uses. In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop “Promotion of Neglected and Underutilized Indigenous Crop Species (NUS) for Food Security and Nutrition in Southeast Asia and the EU”, Battambang, Cambodia, 20–22 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. Verheij, E.W.M.; Coronel, R.E. Plant Resources of South East Asia 2: Edible Fruits and Nuts, 1st ed.; Pudoc Scientific Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991; 446p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Inyang, U.; Oboh, I.; Etuk, B. Drying and the different techniques. Int. J. Food Nutr. Safety 2017, 8, 45–72. [Google Scholar]
  31. Plants of the World Online. Available online: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org (accessed on 1 August 2024).
  32. Boeing, J.S.; Barizao, E.O.; Costa e Silva, B.; Montanher, P.F.; de Cinque Almeida, V.; Visentainer, J.V. Evaluation of solvent effect on the extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities from the berries: Application of principal component analysis. BMC Chem. 2014, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Santas, J.; Carbo, R.; Gordon, M.H.; Almajano, M.P. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of two Spanish onion varieties. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tabart, J.; Kevers, C.; Pincemail, J.; Defraigne, J.-O.; Dommes, J. Comparative antioxidant capacities of phenolic compounds measured by various tests. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. MacDonald-Wicks, L.K.; Wood, L.G.; Garg, M.L. Methodology for the determination of biological antioxidant capacity in vitro: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2046–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marjoni, M.R.; Zulfisa, A. Antioxidant activity of methanol extract/fractions of senggani leaves (Melastoma candidum D. Don). Pharm. Anal. Acta 2017, 8, 1000557. [Google Scholar]
  37. Budaraga, I.O.; Putra, D.P. Analysis antioxidant IC50 liquid smoke of cocoa skin with several purification methods. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 757, 012053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, O.P.; Bhat, T.K. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ou, B.; Hampsch-Woodill, M.; Prior, R.L. Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4619–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tauchen, J.; Huml, L.; Bortl, L.; Doskocil, I.; Jarosova, V.; Marsik, P.; Frankova, A.; Clavo Peralta, Z.M.; Chuspe Zans, M.E.; Havlik, J.; et al. Screening of medicinal plants traditionally used in Peruvian Amazon for in vitro antioxidant and anticancer potential. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 2718–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rondevaldova, J.; Novy, P.; Tauchen, J.; Drabek, O.; Kotikova, Z.; Dajcl, J.; Mascellani, A.; Chrun, R.; Nguon, S.; Kokoska, L. Determination of antioxidants, minerals and vitamins in Cambodian underutilized fruits and vegetables. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 716–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  43. Evans, J.D. Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed.; Brooks/Cole Publishing: Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1995; 624p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  45. Herlina, N.; Riyanto, S.; Martono, S.; Rohman, A. Antioxidant activities, phenolic and flavonoid contents of methanolic extract of Stelechocarpus burahol fruit and its fractions. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 17, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sundari, D.; Handayani, D.S.; Suryanti, V. Chemical compositions, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of kepel (Stelechocarpus burahol) fruit flesh and peel extracts. Biodiversitas 2023, 24, 4668–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ismail, N.A.; Yosanto, A.N.; Jamil, N.A. Kepel (Stelechocarpus burahol) synbiotic supplementation improves oxidative stress in high-fat diet-fed rats. J. Kerman Univ. Med. Sci. 2023, 30, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Casuga, F.P.; Castillo, A.L.; Tolentino Corpuz, M.J.-A. GC–MS analysis of bioactive compounds present in different extracts of an endemic plant Broussonetia luzonica (Blanco) (Moraceae) leaves. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 6, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Antonio, M.A.; Galacgac, E.S. Documentation of the phenocalendar of Allaeanthus luzonicus (Blanco) Fern.-Vill. (family Moraceae) to sustain its utilization. In Plant Diversity in Biocultural Landscapes, 1st ed.; Ramamoorthy, S., Buot, I.E., Jr., Rajasekaran, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 469–493. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kyeong-Won, Y.; Muyeol, K. Taxonomic study of Broussonetia (Moraceae) in Korea. Korean J. Plant Tax. 2009, 39, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, G.W.; Huang, B.K.; Qin, L.P. The genus Broussonetia: A review of its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sun, J.; Liu, S.-F.; Zhang, C.-S.; Yu, L.-N.; Zhu, F.; Yang, Q.-L. Chemical composition and antioxidant activities of Broussonetia papyrifera fruits. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, D.; Kinghorn, A.D. Bioactive compounds from the genus Broussonetia. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2003, 28, 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, X.-J.; Mei, R.-Q.; Zhang, L.; Lu, Q.; Zhao, J.; Adebayo, A.H.; Cheng, Y.-X. Antioxidant phenolics from Broussonetia papyrifera fruits. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 12, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barcelo, R. Phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of edible wild fruits in Benguet, Cordillera administrative region, Philippines. Electron. J. Biol. 2015, 11, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  56. Alakolanga, A.G.A.W.; Savitri Kumar, N.; Jayasinghe, L.; Fujimoto, Y. Antioxidant property and α-glucosidase, α-amylase and lipase inhibiting activities of Flacourtia inermis fruits: Characterization of malic acid as an inhibitor of the enzymes. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2015, 52, 8383–8388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Perera, S.; Silva, A.B.G.; Amarathunga, Y.; De Silva, S.; Jayatissa, R.; Gamage, A.; Merah, O.; Madhujith, T. Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of selected underutilized fruits grown in Sri Lanka. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Selim, S.; Akter, N.; Nayan, S.I.; Chowdury, F.I.; Saffoon, N.; Khan, F.; Ahmed, K.S.; Ahmed, M.I.; Hossain, M.M.; Alam, M.A. Flacourtia indica fruit extract modulated antioxidant gene expression, prevented oxidative stress and ameliorated kidney dysfunction in isoprenaline administered rats. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 26, 101012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, T.; Wan, S.; Shi, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, L.; Guan, Y.; Luo, J.; Luo, Y.; Sun, M.; An, P.; et al. Antioxidant minerals modified the association between iron and type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population. Nutrients 2024, 16, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Petroski, W.; Minich, D.M. Is there such a thing as “anti-nutrients”? A narrative review of perceived problematic plant compounds. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Saripalli, H.R.; Dixit, P.K. Screening of antinutrients in leaves, fruit pulp and seeds of Gishta (Annona spp.) of Ethiopia, North East Africa. IRA—Int. J. Appl. Sci. 2016, 4, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mutakin, M.; Fauziati, R.; Fadhilah, F.N.; Zuhrotun, A.; Amalia, R.; Hadisaputri, Y.E. Pharmacological activities of soursop (Annona muricata Lin.). Molecules 2022, 27, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, H.; Tsao, R.; Deng, Z. Factors affecting the antioxidant potential and health benefits of plant foods. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 96, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Medeiros Gomes, J.; Cahino Terto, M.V.; do Santos, S.G.; da Silva, M.S.; Tavares, J.F. Seasonal variations of polyphenols content, sun protection factor and antioxidant activity of two Lamiaceae species. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zargoosh, Z.; Ghavam, M.; Bacchetta, G.; Tavili, A. Effects of ecological factors on the antioxidant potential and total phenol content of Scrophularia striata Boiss. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Harguindeguy, M.; Fissore, D. On the effects of freeze-drying processes on the nutritional properties of foodstuff: A review. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 846–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Al-Juhaimi, F.; Ghafoor, K.; Ozcan, M.M.; Jahurul, M.H.A.; Babiker, E.E.; Jinal, S.; Sahena, F.; Sharifudin, M.S.; Zaidul, I.S.M. Effect of various food processing and handling methodson preservation of natural antioxidants in fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3872–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arfaoui, L. Dietary plant polyphenols: Effects of food processing on their content and bioavailability. Molecules 2021, 26, 2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.E.; Dhewa, T. Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: An overview. Food Prod. Process Nutr. 2020, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Knez, M.; Ranic, M.; Gurinovic, M. Underutilized plants increase biodiversity, improve food and nutrition security, reduce malnutrition, and enhance human health and well-being. Let’s put them back on the plate! Nutr. Rev. 2024, 82, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lim, T.K. Stelechocarpus burahol. In Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants, 1st ed.; Lim, T.K., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  72. FAO. Public Food Procurement for Sustainable Food Systems and Healthy Diets—Volume 1; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  73. Magdalita, P.M.; Abrigo, M.I.K.M.; Coronel, R.E. Phenotypic evaluation of some promising rare fruit crops in the Philippines. Philipp. Sci. Lett. 2014, 7, 376–386. [Google Scholar]
  74. Padulosi, S.; Amaya, K.; Jager, M.; Gotor, E.; Rojas, W.; Valdivia, R. A holistic approach to enhance the use of neglected and underutilized species: The case of Andean grains in Bolivia and Peru. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1283–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Borelli, T.; Hunter, D.; Padulosi, S.; Amaya, N.; Meldrum, G.; de Oliveira Beltrame, D.M.; Samarasinghe, G.; Wasike, V.W.; Guner, B.; Tan, A.; et al. Local solutions for sustainable food systems: The contribution of orphan crops and wild edible species. Agronomy 2020, 10, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographs of collected neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines. Footnotes: (A) Allaeanthus luzonicus inflorescence, (B) Canarium ovatum seed, (C) Dillenia philippinensis fruit pulp, (D) Ficus pseudopalma leaves, (E) Ficus pseudopalma fruit, (F) Flacourtia indica fruit, (G) Flacourtia inermis fruit, (H) Garcinia intermedia fruit, (I) Heliotropium arboreum leaf, (J) Posoqueria latifolia fruit, (K) Stelechocarpus burahol fruit, (L) Sterculia quadrifida fruit with seeds.
Figure 1. Photographs of collected neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines. Footnotes: (A) Allaeanthus luzonicus inflorescence, (B) Canarium ovatum seed, (C) Dillenia philippinensis fruit pulp, (D) Ficus pseudopalma leaves, (E) Ficus pseudopalma fruit, (F) Flacourtia indica fruit, (G) Flacourtia inermis fruit, (H) Garcinia intermedia fruit, (I) Heliotropium arboreum leaf, (J) Posoqueria latifolia fruit, (K) Stelechocarpus burahol fruit, (L) Sterculia quadrifida fruit with seeds.
Horticulturae 10 01051 g001
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering of antioxidant activities in various plant species. The color gradient represents the intensity of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content. DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; IC50: half maximal inhibitory concentration; ORAC: oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TPC: total phenolic content.
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering of antioxidant activities in various plant species. The color gradient represents the intensity of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content. DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; IC50: half maximal inhibitory concentration; ORAC: oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TPC: total phenolic content.
Horticulturae 10 01051 g002
Table 1. Ethnobotanical data on neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines.
Table 1. Ethnobotanical data on neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines.
Scientific Name of the
Species
FamilyLocal NameVSNCollection SitePlant Part UsedTraditional Edible Uses
Allaeanthus luzonicus (Blanco) Fern.-Vill., syn. Broussonetia luzonica (Blanco) Burr. MoraceaeBaeg,
himbabao
02683KBFRAMarket in Manila, Metropolitan Manila ProvinceinflorescenceInflorescence is cooked and eaten as vegetables [26,27]
Canarium ovatum Engl.BurseraceaePili02684KBFRBGarden of the Institute of Plant Breeding, Los Banos, Laguna ProvinceseedSeeds are eaten as nuts [26,28]
Dillenia philippinensis RolfeDilleniaceaeKatmon02492KBFR8Mount Makiling Forest, Los Banos, Laguna Provincefruit pulpFruit is acid and eaten raw as fruit or used as souring agent [26,28]
Ficus pseudopalma BlancoMoraceaeNiog-niogan02493KBFR9Dr. Coronel Fruit Conservation Farm, Los Banos, Laguna Provinceyoung leavesYoung leaves eaten as vegetable, raw or cooked [26,28]
fruit pulp with seedsFruit eaten raw or cooked; tastes like rhubarb [26,28]
Flacourtia indica (Burm.f.) Merr.SalicaceaeKakai,
palutan
02494KBFRAGarden of the Institute of Plant Breeding, Los Banos, Laguna Provincewhole fruitTasty fruits eaten fresh or processed into jellies and jams [26,29]
Flacourtia inermis Roxb.SalicaceaeLovi-lovi,
batoko plum
02495KBFRBGarden of the Institute of Plant Breeding, Los Banos, Laguna Provincewhole fruitAcidic fruits eaten fresh or processed into jellies and jams [26,28,29]
Garcinia intermedia (Pittier) HammelClusiaceaeBerba,
waika plum
02496KBFRCGarden of the Institute of Plant Breeding, Los Banos, Laguna Provincefruit pulpFruit eaten raw, with sweet to sour taste, or processed into jams, jellies, and drinks [26]
Heliotropium arboreum (Blanco) Mabb., syn. Argusia argentea (L.f.) HeineBoraginaceaeKapal-kapal, salakapo02511KBFR0Sambawan Island beach, Biliran ProvinceleavesLeaves with parsley-like taste, eaten as vegetable raw in salads or cooked [27]
Posoqueria latifolia (Rudge) Schult.RubiaceaeNot known02502KBFR0Dr. Coronel Fruit Conservation Farm, Los Banos, Laguna Provincefruit pulpFleshy raw aril eaten as fruit [26]
Stelechocarpus burahol (Blume) Hook.f. & ThomsonAnnonaceaeKepel02499KBFRFDr. Coronel Fruit Conservation Farm, Los Banos, Laguna Provincefruit pulpFruit pulp is eaten as fresh fruit [26]
Sterculia quadrifida R.Br.MalvaceaeRed-fruited kurrajong02519KBFR8Sambawan Island beach, Biliran Islands provinceseedsSeeds are eaten raw or roasted as nuts [26]
VSN: voucher specimen number.
Table 2. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines.
Table 2. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of neglected and underutilized edible tree species of the Philippines.
SpeciesExtraction Yield (%)Antioxidant Assay/Mean IC50 ± SD (µg/mL)TPC (µg GAE/mg Extract)
DPPHORAC
Allaeanthus luzonicus12.0253.7 ± 13.132.2 ± 12.9133.0 ± 4.6
Canarium ovatum10.2>256>25623.2 ± 4.1
Dillenia philippinensis21.5>256>25618.2 ± 1.7
Ficus pseudopalma leaves7.8>256122.2 ± 8.116.1 ± 0.7
F. pseudopalma pulp with seeds7.2>256106.7 ± 25.218.6 ± 0.9
Flacourtia indica57.5>256203.7 ± 25.445.9 ± 1.1
Flacourtia inermis38.1>256236.6 ± 14.625.6 ± 1.0
Garcinia intermedia26.1>256>25617.8 ± 1.9
Heliotropium arboreum11.1>256>25616.7 ± 4.1
Posoqueria latifolia20.1>256166.7 ± 21.919.6 ± 0.8
Stelechocarpus burahol12.391.0 ± 12.637.9 ± 8.7202.1 ± 6.7
Sterculia quadrifida13.1>256152.3 ± 9.455.6 ± 2.4
Trolox 9.2 ± 2.57.9 ± 1.2
DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; IC50: half maximal inhibitory concentration; ORAC: oxygen radical absorbance capacity; SD: standard deviation; TPC: total phenolic content.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rondevaldova, J.; Tauchen, J.; Mascellani, A.; Tulkova, J.; Magdalita, P.M.; Tulin, E.E.; Kokoska, L. Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Underutilized Edible Tree Species of the Philippines. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101051

AMA Style

Rondevaldova J, Tauchen J, Mascellani A, Tulkova J, Magdalita PM, Tulin EE, Kokoska L. Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Underutilized Edible Tree Species of the Philippines. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(10):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rondevaldova, Johana, Jan Tauchen, Anna Mascellani, Jana Tulkova, Pablito M. Magdalita, Edgardo E. Tulin, and Ladislav Kokoska. 2024. "Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Underutilized Edible Tree Species of the Philippines" Horticulturae 10, no. 10: 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101051

APA Style

Rondevaldova, J., Tauchen, J., Mascellani, A., Tulkova, J., Magdalita, P. M., Tulin, E. E., & Kokoska, L. (2024). Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Underutilized Edible Tree Species of the Philippines. Horticulturae, 10(10), 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop