1. Introduction
Longan (
Dimocarpus longan Lour.), one of the renowned evergreen tropical or subtropical fruit trees of high economic value in Sapindaceae family, originated from South China or South Asia and has been commercially cultivated in China for over 2000 years [
1,
2]. At present, it has been extensively grown in many countries such as China, Thailand, Vietnam, India, and so on. Among these regions, China has the largest planting area (over 300,000 hectares) and the highest total production (more than 1.5 million tons) [
2,
3]. Longan fruit is commonly called dragon eye. Its edible aril accumulates high-leveled nutritive phytochemicals such as polysaccharides, vitamin C (about 0.8 mg g
−1 fresh weight), polyphenols (about 0.75 mg g
−1 fresh weight), and carbohydrates (about 150 mg g
−1 fresh weight), which confers it not only the unique and appealing flavor but also the bioactive effects including antitumor, immunomodulatory and antioxidant capacity [
4,
5]. Thus, it is widely consumed and gains popularity with the global people [
6].
Longan fruit ripens and is harvested in hot summer with high prevailing temperatures (25–33 °C) and humidity (>75%), which results in the extreme irresistance to postharvest long-term storage and long-distance transportation [
6,
7,
8,
9]. In general, longan fruit can be stored for about 30 days at 4–5 °C, but its shelf life is shorter (6–7 days) under ambient conditions (about 25–33 °C, >75% relative humidity) without any postharvest handlings due to its rapid peel browning, highly perishable nature, and susceptibility to postharvest pathogens such as
Phomopsis longanae Chi [
10] and
Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griff. & Maubl. [
11]. In China, ‘Shixia’ is the main cultivar with the largest cultivated area and yield, followed by ‘Chuliang’. Up to now, in China, longan is still a fruit present on the local market for the purpose of fresh sales and consumption, although it can be processed into products such as juices, wines, and vinegars [
12]. Accordingly, postharvest quality control and maintenance are crucial for fresh longan fruit, and meanwhile, a correct estimate for the fruit quality condition seems indispensable for consumers when purchasing.
Fruit quality can be defined as the degree of excellence in a given product, which includes the formation and postharvest maintenance of both the external appearance and the internal quality such as flavor and nutrition substances of the fruit [
13]. As one of the major quality aspects, flavor consists of taste and odor that have a direct impact on the individual purchase preferences of consumers [
13]. However, the flavor quality of fruits may generally decline rapidly and undergo the processes of flavor loss as well as the production of off-flavor during the postharvest period [
14]. Longan fruit, one of the typical non-climacteric fruits, is prone to rot and deteriorate in the postharvest stage manifested by pericarp browning and aril breakdown, along with the production of an unpleasant and strong off-odor, especially during storage under an ambient environment [
7]. Although a series of strategies comprising physical, chemical, and biological treatments have been applied to reduce postharvest loss and extend the storage life of longan fruit over the past several decades, it cannot reverse the ultimate declining trend of quality [
7,
8,
15,
16,
17]. Most previous studies focused on the mechanisms of the pericarp browning and aril breakdown, which are the common appearance indexes that affect the color of the longan pericarp and indicate of interior quality deterioration, respectively [
9]. In fact, it seems difficult for consumers to distinguish the actual quality condition of longan fruit from the apparent color or the internal pulp conditions, because studies have found that the mesocarp of longan was the first to turn brown, followed by the endocarp, and then the exocarp during postharvest storage [
18]. Moreover, even if the aril of longan has already broken down or become bland after harvest and storage, the pericarp appears sound [
18]. In this instance, seeking other aspects to help consumers correctly appraise the quality status of postharvest longan becomes extremely urgent.
Odorants, a mixture bestowed by diverse volatile compounds, constitute an intuitive sensory characteristic of fruit [
19]. It is easily perceived by humans, which makes it an important indicator for consumers to evaluate the quality and freshness of fruit [
13,
20]. Those volatiles emitted by fruits may undergo transformation during postharvest storage by reflecting in the degradation of the original characteristic aroma of the fruit or leading to an increase in the content of off-odor substances [
14]. Longan fruit, usually eaten fresh, bears a succulent, sweet, and aromatic flavor but without apparent aroma, which makes people pay far too little attention to the volatile compounds to ignore the severe off-odor produced by the fruit during postharvest storage. Whilst a published study has been carried out on the volatile substances of different longan landraces [
21], there appear to be no empirical investigations aiming at understanding the changes in volatile profiles that occur under ambient storage and the relevance with the quality of postharvest longan.
Given that longan fruits are temporarily stored under normal temperatures in general for quick sales and consumption during the fresh period, an ambient storage experiment was carried out by using the longan fruits harvested from a main cultivar named ‘Shixia’. For comprehensively estimating the storability and quality status, a systematic detection with regard to the changes in some parameters including appearance, color, taste, volatile profiles, cell state, and deterioration condition after a period of normal temperature storage was conducted using techniques including electronic tongue, electronic nose, and gas chromatography. Moreover, sensory evaluation was conducted to analyze the relationship between the longan fruit quality indexes and the quality attribute under storage. This study attempts to provide a new perspective to learn about the quality deterioration process of longan during the postharvest ambient storage and promote the marketing and purchasing of this fruit.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Longan Fruit Materials, Treatments, Storage, and Sampling
The commercial mature fruits of longan (cv. ‘Shixia’, SX) were harvested from the orchard of Fruit Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences in July 2022, put into a plastic basket, packed with PE plastic wrap to prevent water loss, placed in a truck with refrigeration air conditioning (about 18–20 °C), and immediately delivered to the laboratory. The individuals with uniform color, maturity, shape (longitudinal diameter/transverse diameter, about 0.90–0.94), and size (single fruit weight, about 8.0–9.0 g), and free of disease or blemishes were selected for the subsequent experiments.
A total of 600 longan fruits were selected and dipped into 500 mg/L prochloraz solution for 2 min, and subjected to a natural air-dry at room temperature for 30 min. Then, a precise weight (200 ± 1 g) of the longan fruits was packed into a rectangle perforated polyethylene wrap box (650 mL), which was sealed with a 0.025 mm thick polyethylene (PE) bag and then stored at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C) and 85% relative humidity (RH). Three boxes of the longan samples were randomly taken at three days interval to determine the following quality indexes.
2.2. Determination of Chromatic Value
Three wrap boxes of the fruits (about 60 fruits in total) were randomly selected at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after storage to determine the chromatic value of each fruit according to the method reported in our previous work [
22]. The
L* (lightness, 0 to 100: black-white),
a* (negative to positive: green to red),
b* (negative to positive: blue to yellow), and
C* (represents the color saturation) values on the equatorial plane of each fruit were measured using a color analyzer (NH310, 3nh Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). The measurement at each time point was subjected to three repetitions.
2.3. Sampling and Determination of Total Soluble Solid (TSS) and Vitamin C (VC) Content
Three wrap boxes of the longan fruits were randomly selected at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 DAS for sampling. Ten fruits from each wrap box were separated into pericarp and aril. The collected aril was immediately used for juicing to determine the TSS content (%) by a digital refractometer (PAL-BX/ACID F5, ATAGO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The VC content of longan pulp was determined by an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer method according to a previously reported method [
7]. A total of 10 µL longan juice was diluted with 9900 µL oxalic acid solution (2%,
w/
v, pH6.0 adjusted with NaOH) and then the absorbance was measured at 267 nm. The VC content was calculated by a standard curve. Three biological replicates of the sampling and measurement of the TSS and VC content were performed.
2.4. Determination of Relative Electrolytic Conductivity, Decay Rate, Pericarp Browning Index, and Aril Breakdown Index
Relative electrical conductivity, an indicator of membrane permeability, was measured according to [
17] with minor modifications. Thirty pericarp discs were derived from ten longan fruits using a puncher (5 mm in diameter) and washed three times with deionized water. Then, twenty discs were transferred into 25 mL deionized water. After incubation at 25 °C for 30 min, the electrolyte value (D1) of the bathing solution was determined using a conductivity meter (STARTER3100C, Ohaus International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Afterwards, the solution with discs was boiled for 15 min and quickly cooled to room temperature for detecting the total electrolyte value (D2) again. The electrolyte value of deionized water (D0) was used as a blank control. Relative conductivity rate was calculated according to Equation (1):
If a fruit showed an occurrence of white mycelium, became soft, and the color of its exocarp darkened, it was considered as rotted. According to the method mentioned in [
7], three boxes of longan fruits were randomly selected for examining the decay rate at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 DAS.
The browning index of the inner pericarp was calculated according to the reported method [
8]. The browned area (BNA) of each fruit was estimated using the following scales: score = 0, no browning; score = 1, BNA was 0.1% to 25%; score = 2, BNA was 25.1% to 50%; score = 3, BNA was 50.1% to 75%; score = 4, BNA was 75.1% to 99.9%; score = 5, BNA was 100%. The pericarp browning index was calculated according to Equation (2):
The aril breakdown index was calculated according to a reported method [
8]. The breakdown area (BDA) of each longan aril was evaluated using the following scales: score = 0, no breakdown; score = 1, BDA was 0.1% to 25%; score = 2, BDA was 25.1 to 50%; score = 3, BDA was 50.1% to 75%; score = 4, BDA was 75.1% to 99.9%; score = 5, BDA was 100%. The aril breakdown index was calculated using Equation (3):
2.5. E-Tongue Analysis
E-tongue (ISENSO SuperTongue, New York, NY, USA) measurements were performed on the juice of long fruit to evaluate the taste sense properties according to the method described by [
23] with minor modifications. A total of 10 g frozen powder of longan pulp was dissolved into 30 mL ultrapure water. After ultrasonic extraction for 10 min, the sample was centrifuged at 10,000×
g and 35 mL supernatant was transferred to the electronic tongue special beaker. Another 30 mL distilled water was prepared as lotion. In order to avoid the fluctuation of the sensor detection value, the data were collected for three biological replicates and three technical repetitions.
2.6. E-Nose Analysis
The PEN3 portable electronic nose (AIRSENSE, Mecklenburg, Germany) was used to detect the volatile of longan in the package during storage, according to the method described by [
24] with minor modifications. The detector is equipped with 10 metal oxide sensor arrays to evaluate aromatic benzenes (W1C), nitrogen oxides (W5S), ammonia (W3C), hydrogens (W6S), alkanes (W5C), methane (W1S), terpenes, hydrogen sulfides (W1W), alcohols (W2S), aromatic components & organic sulfides (W2W), and aromatic alkanes (W3S). In loading analysis, the larger the value of the sensor gets on PC1, the more effectively the samples separate from each other. Additionally, the closer the sensor distribution is to the origin, the less it distinguishes the sample. Three biological replicate measurements of the volatile in the package were performed.
2.7. GC–MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds
The identification and quantification of volatiles were performed with headspace gas chromatography as in reference [
25] using an Agilent 1890B gas chromatograph and a 5977A mass spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DB-5MS column (20 m × 0.18 mm × 0.18 μm film thickness). A solid-phase microextraction device consisting of divinylbenzene/carboxylic acid/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fibers (50/30 μm inner diameter, 2 cm length; Supelco, Darmstadt, Germany) was inserted into headspace vials and the compounds were extracted at 40 °C thermostatic water bath for 30 min. After extraction, the SPME fibers were inserted into the GC-MS at 250 °C for 1 h.
The carrier gas was high-purity helium (purity ≥ 99.99%) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The temperature program started at 35 °C for 5 min and was ramped up to 150 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, then continued to heat up to 240 °C at a rate of 10 °C min and was then held at 240 °C for 2 min, and the electron impact (EI) ionization source operated at 70 eV. The mass spectrometer scanned the range of 35–500 amu.
The quantification of the volatile compounds within the package was based on area normalization. Compound identification was achieved through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) MS database (
https://webbook.nist.gov/; accessed on 6 January 2023). The compounds with
p < 0.05 and variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1 were thought to have a statistically significant contribution.
2.8. Odor Evaluation
The odor emitted by the SX longan samples was tested according to the method mentioned in the reference [
26] with minor modifications. The grade of off-odor concentration was evaluated by a continuous scale ranging from 0 (odorless) to 5 (strong and unbearable odor).
2.9. Sensory Analysis
The longan samples were evaluated and scored by a group of sensory panels that were uniformly trained on the sensory indexes and scoring methods before the evaluation. Since SX longan was inedible after storage longer than 6 days, the samples from 0, 3, and 6 DAS were used to perform an organoleptic flavor evaluation. Nine people made up the sensory panel, and they were trained by the standard mentioned in [
27] with slight changes. Each longan was randomly numbered, and then placed on a plate and distributed to the evaluators. Each sample was tasted and scored, and then the next sample was evaluated at 2 min intervals after gargling with water. The evaluators rated the appearance, sweetness, flavor, texture, and overall taste preference of longan in 3 rounds. The evaluation guidelines considered a continuous scale ranging from 1 (the lowest score) to 9 (the highest score) [
27]. The overall acceptability was presented in weighted average calculated as follows.
2.10. Statistical Analysis
The original data from three replicates were processed using Microsoft Excel 2021. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test was conducted using the SPSS 26 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze significant differences. Softwares including the Origin 2022 statistical software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) and Adobe Illustrator 2021 were used to edit the graphs. The WinMuster software (version 1.6.2.14), a software coming with e-nose, was used to process e-nose data for LDA (linear discriminant analysis) and loading analysis. The analyses of the electronic tongue data were performed by the ISENSO Tongue software (version 2.1.0.7). Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and VIP were performed using the SIMCA (Version 14.1, Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) software. TBtools (Version 1.115, Guangzhou, China) was used to plot the heatmaps.
4. Discussion
Fruit is a kind of popular food product appreciated for its appealing color, fragrance, and taste, as well as its unique nutritional properties and high flavor quality [
14]. Recently, due to the augmentation of consumer awareness in all aspects associated with fruit quality, quality control of preharvest or postharvest fruit has become an issue of major importance. Monitoring the fruit quality and freshness has attracted a great deal of interest from both the consumer and the fruit industry [
6]. Longan, praised as the king of fruits for its high nutritional values and valuable pharmacological effects, is widely cultivated and well-liked all over the world [
1,
2]. Nevertheless, its bad resistance to postharvest rot and deterioration, which was primarily induced by the fragility of the fruit pericarp structure, the continuously relatively strong metabolism, and the vulnerability to pathogen infection, not only damages the overall sensory flavor quality but also sets a pronounced limit for long-term storage or distant transportation [
18,
35]. Thus, available means to monitor and ensure the after-harvested quality becomes essential.
Fruit quality, consisting of sensory or organoleptic quality, nutritional quality, microbiological quality, and so on, is of great importance in affecting fruit acceptance and consumer satisfaction [
28]. Among them, sensory experiences evoked by the sensory quality of various fruit products are the key to prompt a feeling of pleasure and commercial success [
28]. Sensory or organoleptic properties comprising appearance, color, flavor, taste, odor, texture, and overall acceptability are the significant determinants to assess the fruit’s sensory quality [
13]. To judge and measure these quality characteristics, sensory analysis that is conventionally realized by two common techniques, namely subjective or qualitative and objective or quantitative methods serves as an essential tool [
28]. The subjective measurement of fruit sensory properties is managed through organoleptic responses that are normally measured by a rating test with a group of trained panelists, whereas objective or discriminative measurement demands the application of instrument or equipment to accurately check the routine quality [
28,
34]. In this study, we established a set of data from instrument assessment and descriptive measurements of ‘Shixia’ longan for evaluating the quality condition during postharvest storage.
The appearance of fruit, generally designated by the surface properties such as color, shape, and texture, can reflect some information about the preference of human sight sensation. In general, desirable surface characteristics like glossy or shiny superficial color can be determined as the superior manifestation of fruits with high quality [
28]. Interestingly, however, consumers may face confusion or trouble when judging the quality condition of longan fruit simply by the apparent state presented in the external pericarp with naked human eyes. Longan fruit is such a particular fruit that the change in its superficial yellow-brown color in the exocarp lags behind the endocarp during the early storage [
17]. Only when the quality deterioration is too severe in the late storage period does the outer peel color of the longan fruit show a significant darkening color (
Figure 1). Alternatively, it is worth noting that the longan fruit has been undergoing a quality transformation since storage day 3 from indexes reflecting the fruit’s external or internal condition that have clearly exhibited an accordant decline in quality within the storage day 3 to day 6 (
Figure 1c;
Figure 2). However, a similar good apparent state during the storage days 0, 3, and day 6 has no difference in these three sampling days, which can be verified by the detection of
L*,
b*, and
C* values (
Figure 1).
As one of the major aspects among the fruit quality attributes, the flavor of the fruit is the combination and interaction in taste and odor, and has a direct impact on the individual purchase preference of consumers [
20]. Taste is an important organoleptic property that governs the human acceptance and appreciation of fruits through the mouth. Some taste-related metabolites such as sugars, acids, and phenolics jointly contribute to the unique perception in the mouth (sweetness, acidity, or bitterness) [
13]. Remarkably, the present work has identified that the taste substance of the SX longan starting to rot (at 6 DAS) can not significantly be told apart from that of the clearly deteriorated SX longan (at 9 DAS) by instrument detection (
Figure 2A). Similarly, the main taste compounds TSS and VC are insignificant between these two storage periods (
Figure 2B).
In parallel to taste, odor is another kind of key factor that is made up of a wide range of volatile compounds to jointly convey the flavor of fruits [
13,
20]. Generally, these odor-developing components are firstly perceived by the human olfactory system and then transmitted the odor signals to the brain, which has a decisive influence on consumption [
28]. Fresh longan is a kind of distinctive fruit with a special flavor but without an obvious aroma, resulting in little attention to the volatile compounds emitted by the fruit. Different from the previous results that esters (68.4%) and terpenoids (27.1%) were quantitatively the most significant among longan volatiles, among which ethyl acetate (66.2%) and (E)-Pocimene (26.7%) were clearly dominant in fresh longan [
21], our findings pointed out that the terpene compounds are obviously dominant in quantity with the content of β-ocimene far ahead of other volatile substances (
Table S1). Moreover, β-ocimene has a sweet herbaceous scent according to the Flavornet and Human Odor Space database (
https://www.flavornet.org/flavornet.html, accessed on 8 January 2023), which is consistent with the odor evaluation result in fresh longan (storage day 0). Thus, some discrepancy probably could be observed between different
D. longan varieties, and meanwhile, the accumulated β-ocimene may be the characteristic aroma volatile in fresh SX longan.
Based on the consideration of the distinct production of strong and unpleasant odor in longan fruit in the postharvest stage, we firstly emphasize on confirming the change in volatiles during postharvest storage in this work. Contrary to the insignificant difference shown in the result of taste, the odor under the transition period (storage day 6) significantly separates from the obvious deterioration stage (after storing 9 days) (
Figure 4A), and is further demonstrated by drastic increasing off-odor concentration grade in odor evaluation (
Table S2). Furthermore, some unpleasant volatile substances including alcohol (ethanol), acid (acetic acid), and esters (acetic acid methyl ester and ethyl acetate) of longan fruits were increased gradually with the extension of storage, which is possibly the explanation for the cause of off-odor from postharvest physiological processes (
Figure 4;
Table S1). Backed by numerous studies, ethanol is the most common odor alcohol found in fruits and the alcohols may emit odors such as ‘musty, mushroom, fatty, oily, bitter, burnt’ that are not part of the fruits flavor [
36,
37]. Moreover, it has been found that the increase in esters may lead to ‘overripe’ odor, among which ethyl acetate has been studied as an off-flavor indicator of fruit anaerobic metabolism [
38]. Alternatively, acids can emit a powerful sour-rancid odor that has a negative impact on the quality of fruit flavor, especially acetic acid that has the characteristics of ‘sharp, pungent, sour’ odor [
14]. Hence, the significant change in odor profile during longan fruit spoilage suggests a joint influence by the decrease in aromatic substance (β-ocimene) and the increase in specific off-odor components (alcohol, acid, and esters). The result of the sensory evaluation in accordance with the perceptibility of human sensation also presents a more important relevance between the comprehensive appraisement and the odor, rather than the other sensory parameters (
Figure 5). It should be noted that the results and conclusion of this experiment were obtained in the longan fruit stored at room temperature conditions (25–33 °C, humidity >75%). These results may not provide an accurate reference for the sensory and quality evaluation of longan fruit under other storage and logistics conditions such as low-temperature storage and controlled atmosphere storage.