Next Article in Journal
Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion
Previous Article in Journal
Screening 60Co-γ Irradiated Camellia oleifera Lines for Anthracnose-Resistant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Fertigation Scheduling Methods on the Yields and Photosynthetic Parameters of Drip-Fertigated Chinese Chive (Allium tuberosum) Grown in a Horticultural Greenhouse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of F1 Hybrid Strawberry Grown under Controlled Greenhouse Condition

1
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
The National Research and Development Center for Sustainable Agriculture (Estidamah), Riyadh Techno Valley, Riyadh 11422, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(9), 941; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090941
Submission received: 25 July 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 31 August 2024 / Published: 2 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Horticultural Production in Controlled Environment)

Abstract

:
Carbon dioxide enrichment inside a greenhouse is a sustainable approach to increasing crop production worldwide. Recently, the F1 hybrid strawberry became an alternative to runner-propagated cultivation as an innovative method to shorten the production period and increase strawberry production. This work aims to present CO2 enrichment as a sustainable tool that improves the yield in a controlled greenhouse and addresses the efficiency of three F1 hybrid strawberry varieties grown under Saudi Arabian conditions. A greenhouse experiment was conducted at the National Research and Development Center for Sustainable Agriculture (Estidamah), KSA, to study the impact of two CO2 levels (400 ppm (“ambient”) and 600 ppm (“enrichment”)) on the growth, photosynthesis traits, fruit yield and fruit quality of three F1 hybrid strawberry varieties grown under soilless culture conditions. The results show that CO2 enrichment significantly improved the phenotyping of strawberry growth traits at 60 days post-transplanting. The physiological response of the varieties to CO2 enrichment reveals a significant increase in the photosynthetic rate (129.7%) and intercellular CO2 (43.7%) in the leaves of strawberry exposed to CO2 enrichment rather than in ambient conditions, combined with a significant increase in the number of fruits per plant (27.5%) and total fruit yield (42.2%). A similar pattern was observed with varieties D and S in terms of fruit number, length and diameter. However, CO2 at 600 ppm promoted total soluble solid accumulation and vitamin C for the tested varieties. In contrast, CO2 enrichment significantly decreased nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium accumulation in the leaves of the exposed plants in comparison to 400 ppm of CO2. These results suggest that increasing CO2 enrichment could contribute to an increase in strawberry yield and nutritional value and demonstrate that understanding the response of each variety to CO2 enrichment is important to support selecting suitable greenhouse strawberry varieties to improve crop yield.

1. Introduction

Sustainable agriculture leads to enhanced agricultural productivity by strengthening resilience to the unfavorable impacts of climate change [1], in order for the planet to feed 10 billion people by 2050 [2]. One of the challenges for global food security is the limitation of agricultural land due to soil erosion and nutrient depletion, mainly in arid zones [3]. Numerous reports have shown that protected culture is a key answer to provide markets with adequate quantities of vegetables to cope with global demand because of its capability for optimal plant development [4]. Saudi Arabia has ~124 thousand greenhouses producing ~584 thousand tons of different crops, with USD ~335 million of annual sales [5]. However, improving greenhouse production in arid zones requires a new generation of technology and supporting systems to achieve the maximum production with a sustainable cost [6]. In this respect, advanced greenhouse technologies are becoming more essential for maximizing crop production per cultivation unit area in hot climates [7]. The performance of crop growth and productivity in the greenhouse is basically controlled by several factors, like water, fertilizers and greenhouse climate conditions [8]. Therefore, adapting the microclimate conditions inside the greenhouse is considered a suitable approach to increase crop yield and quality [9]. One of the factors that limits crop growth is frequent insufficient carbon dioxide (CO2) inside the greenhouses during the daytime [10]. Atmospheric CO2 has risen from 280 to 390 mmol mol−1, and it is expected to reach 500–1000 µmol mol−1 by the next century [11], which will potentially increase the global temperature by 1.8–5.8 °C. This is contributing a major share to global warming [12], which subsequently influences plant growth performance and crop yields [13]. Carbon dioxide significantly affects crop photosynthesis and productivity when its concentration is within the appropriate range [14,15,16,17]. Under low-ventilation circumstances within the greenhouse, levels of CO2 decrease to less than 250 ppm, which is below the optimal required concentration of 400~450 ppm [18,19]. CO2 enrichment has demonstrated an increase in lettuce yield and growth rate [20,21], cucumber fruit biomass and leaf area index [22] and total yield of tomato [23]. Furthermore, the authors of ref. [24] reported that CO2 fertilization improved bell pepper growth and yield associated with changes in stomatal traits, leaf photosynthesis and foliar nitrogen. Lettuce fresh and dry weight increased with increasing CO2 concentrations, with the greatest increases observed between 400 and 800 ppm [25]. In strawberry, a 25% increase in the marketable fruit yield and 1.2% rise in fruit brix were determined for the cultivar Sagahonoka [26], while the cultivar Koiminori presented a 21–28% increase in average fruit weight and 29–35% increase in fruit numbers under CO2 enrichment [27]. However, another study [28] confirmed that elevated CO2 increased the yield of vegetables by 34%, the harvest index by 23% and the root to shoot biomass ratio by 8%. Several studies have shown that different technologies can be used for CO2 enrichment inside the greenhouse, since CO2 is dissipated to the outside if the greenhouse is ventilated. For instance, these include natural ventilation by using windows or fans, the direct supply of compressed CO2 [29], carbonaceous fuel burning [30,31] and decomposition of agricultural wastes by microbial fermentation to release CO2 for crop production [32]. Strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa) is produced worldwide, because of its great importance to producers and consumers [33,34]. According to the authors of ref. [35], the global production of strawberry has exceeded 8.3 million tons produced on ~372 thousand hectares. The fruit of strawberry has high-quality nutritional properties, like polyphenols, ellagic acid, anthocyanins and vitamin C [36]. In Saudi Arabia, the domestic market depends on imported strawberries to fulfill the needs of consumers. In 2020, the country imported a total of ~21,969 tons of strawberries (fresh and frozen), with a value exceeding USD ~71 million. This high import volume is attributed to the limited supply of locally produced strawberries, which are currently priced in a higher range. Local farmers keep using runner-propagated plants to cultivate a new crop cycle, which has led to concern about the quality of the seedlings and a subsequent decrease in yield each year. However, in several countries, a new approach to strawberry cultivation has been adopted, which involves the use of hybrid strawberry seeds [37]. This innovative method is anticipated to shorten the production period of seedlings, with no transmission of pests and diseases. A small quantity of seed gives logistical advantages in storing and transportation, and enhances overall productivity compared to the traditional cultivation methods. This work investigates the effect of CO2 enrichment on crop production in a controlled greenhouse and addresses the efficiency of F1 hybrid strawberry varieties to increase fruit yield under Saudi Arabian condition. The morphological and physiological characteristics of strawberry plants will be evaluated and compared in terms of growth, photosynthesis traits, fruit yield and fruit quality under soilless culture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Greenhouse Setup

A greenhouse experiment was carried out at the National Research and Development Center for Sustainable Agriculture (Estidamah, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). A Hi-Tech greenhouse with 400 m2 (16 m × 25 m) and 6 m height was used; the compartments were covered with a diffuse tempered single glass, with 91% light transmission, 80% hemispherical light transmission and 75% haze. Both compartments are supported by air conditioning system, to provide sufficient cooling and avoid ventilation with outside air during the growth season. Conditioned air is distributed by air ducts placed on the growing gutter. The greenhouse climate was monitored by three separated measuring boxes while the nutrient recipe was applied through drip irrigation system [38], whereas the setpoint of EC and pH of 1.8 and 5.8, respectively, was adjusted. Seeds of the three F1 hybrid varieties of strawberry Fragraria X anansa Duch “Delizzimo”, “Estavana”, “Soraya” ABZ seeds, Netherlands, were sown in rockwool cubes on 15 September 2023. Two months later, seedlings were transferred to the compartments under controlled conditions of 20 ± 1 °C/day and 16 ± 1 °C/night, with 2.5 plants per m2 plant density.

2.2. Carbon Dioxide Injection System

One-week post-transplanting, plants were treated with two carbon dioxide concentrations. Therefore, two separate greenhouses were used in this study: carbon-rich (600 ppm) and ambient CO2 (400 ppm). Each CO2 concentration was adjusted by an automatic greenhouse CO2 control system (Figure 1). CO2 was supplied through injection system to supplement the natural levels of CO2 in the greenhouse atmosphere. The system consists of a carbon dioxide tank, evaporator and pressure regulator outside the greenhouse (Figure 1). The tank stores the CO2 gas in a compressed form. Hoses are connected to the tank, allowing a controlled release and distribution of CO2 into the greenhouse environment. The CO2 outlets are strategically positioned below the planting gutter-lines, ensuring that the released CO2 is evenly distributed throughout the growing area (Figure 2).

2.3. Vegetative Growth

Plant height, total number of leaves per plant, number of crowns per plant, crown diameter, fresh and dry weight of plant leaves were recorded at two months post-transplanting. Leaf area was measured using the LI-COR leaf area meter, model 3000A (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The crown diameter was determined using a Vernier caliper.

2.4. Yield and Its Component

The total yield per plant was determined by continuous fruit harvesting of free-decay fruit, with 90% red color. The number of fruits per plant was counted via dividing the total harvesting fruit number by the number of planted plants. Representative fruit samples were dried at 70 °C to determine fruit dry weight. Ten fully colored fruits were randomly selected to measure fruit length and diameter with digital caliper at 90 days posttransplant. Finally, the fresh fruit weight was measured to determine the average fruit weight.

2.5. Vitamin C

Strawberry fruit juice was used to determine vitamin C by the titration method, as illustrated by [39]. Vitamin C in fruit juice was calculated as:
Ascorbic   acid = y x × 100
where y = volume of dye used milliliters in titrating 2 milliliters fresh juice. x = volume of dye used (mL) in titrating 2 milliliters standard stock solution.

2.6. Titratable Acidity (TA)

The titratable acidity (TA) of strawberry fruit juice was determined by titration with NaOH (0.1 N). Five milliliters of filtered juice was added into 50 mL flask, and two drops of phenolphthalein (PhPh) indicator were added to the juice. The exact amount of NaOH solution was used to calculate the acidity of fruit juice according to [39].

2.7. Total Soluble Solids (TSS)

Total soluble solids percentages (Brix %) were measured in sweet pepper juice samples via a hand digital portable refractometer (PR.101 model, ATAGO Co., Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. Nutrient Analysis

Leaves of strawberry plants were collected at 60 days post-transplant and cleaned with double-distilled water, then oven dried at 105 °C for 24 h. Thereafter, plants were grounded and sieved with a 0.5 mm sieve and preserved until digestion; then, 0.1 g from each sample was weighted in a 100 mL conical flask. The samples were digested with acids (hydrogen peroxide and concentrated sulfuric acid) using a hotplate. After digestion, the sample volume was completed to a 100 mL by adding distilled water and filtrated using filter paper. Total macro- and micronutrients were determined using (Kjeldahl method for nitrogen, spectrophotometer for phosphorus and flame-photometer for potassium and calcium, and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for micro-nutrients) [40,41].

2.9. Leaf Gas Exchange Properties

Photosynthesis rate (Pr), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) were determined by a portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR 6400, Lincoln, NE, USA) using a chamber head with a natural light window under ambient air temperature and relative humidity conditions. Two months post-transplanting, five plants were selected from each treatment for photosynthetic measurement, and the photosynthetic rates were measured for four different strawberry leaves per plant with a minimum of three repeated measurements for each leaf of the four expanded leaves. Measurements were performed from 8:00 to 10:00; the chamber relative humidity was 70%, leaf temperature at 24 °C, leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit of 1.0 ± 0.1 kPa and light intensity at 400–600 μmol·m2·s1 PAR.

2.10. Chlorophyll Traits

To estimate Chlorophyll a, b, and total Chlorophyll, three plants were randomly chosen from each treatment. Three fully expanded leaves were taken at 60 days post-transplanting. A fresh leaf sample weighing 5 milligrams was collected and put into tiny test tubes with 10 mL of acetone at a concentration of 100%. Samples were wrapped in aluminum foil and stored in a dark place for seven to ten days. The absorption was measured at wavelengths of 662 for Chlorophyll and 646 for Chlorophyll b using a spectrophotometer (UV-6705, Jenway Co., London, UK). Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content were calculated as follows:
C h l o r o p h y l l   a = [ ( 11.75 × A   662 ) ( 2.35 × A   645 ) ] × V 1000 × W
C h l o r o p h y l l   b = [ ( 18.61 × A   645 ) ( 3.96 × A   662 ) ] × V 100
T o t a l   C h l o r o p h y l l = [ ( 20.2 × A   645 + ( 8.02 × A   662 ) ] × V 1000 × W
A: specific wavelength. V: extract’s volume (mL). W: fresh weight of leaves (g) [42].

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Plants were randomized in complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and two-factor experiment. Collected data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Means were compared by Fisher’s least significance difference test (LSD) at p < 0.05 using SAS software package 9.2 for windows [43].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Vegetative Growth Traits

The results show that CO2 at 600 ppm (enrichment) significantly improved the phenotyping growth traits of strawberry at 60 days post-transplanting (Table 1). However, the three grown F1 varieties show slight significant differences. Under the two CO2 concentrations, CO2 at 600 ppm caused significant increases in terms of leaf area (153.4%), number of leaves (93.7%) and leaves DW per plant (71.4%) of variety D, while varieties E and S presented significant improvements regarding the number of crowns per plant (20.6%, 52.35) and crown diameter (29.4%, 33.65), respectively. In addition, FW leaves of the S variety recorded a superior value in comparison to other varieties grown under 600 ppm of CO2. Similar results were obtained by [28], who indicated that CO2 enrichment significantly promoted the leaf growth of strawberry plants. The authors of [44] found that the number of leaves, leaf area and dry matter content of watermelon plants were significantly increased at 800 ppm of CO2. In bell paper, total biomass was increased by 35% when increasing the CO2 concentration to 800 μmol·mol−1 [24]. Likewise, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves, root length, leaf width, and lettuce leaf area were positively affected by CO2 enrichment, over a 30-day period, compared to ambient CO2 [45]. Similarly, [12] mentioned that CO2 enrichment at 700 ppm increased the leaf area of tomato plants by 42.4% compared to ambient CO2 conditions. These significant responses in strawberry growth may be due to the stimulation of net photosynthesis on leaf area expansion under elevated CO2 conditions [26,46]. This explanation is confirmed in Table 2, which shows the photosynthetic rate was raised by 129.7% with CO2 at 600 ppm rather than 400 ppm. A similar conclusion was reported by [47], who explained that the positive effect of CO2 enrichment is linked to increased photosynthesis in annual plants. However, many reports pointed out that CO2 enrichment promotes the growth of C3 plants by raising photosynthesis [48,49]. Despite the obvious effect of the CO2 enrichment (600 ppm) on the three grown strawberry varieties, the interaction shows a clear cultivar-dependent characteristic. Thus, understanding the response of each cultivar to CO2 enrichment is important to support selecting suitable greenhouse strawberry varieties towards improving crop yield [50]. However, non-consistent patterns of the used three hybrids according to growth traits might be related to the time of sampling, 60 days, which is a powerful growth period that minimizes the difference among the cultivars. Also, under the constant growth conditions in the highly controlled greenhouse, the cultivars may react similarly to light, temperature and the nutrient status of soil, as well as available metabolites [51] and their allocation to the aboveground plant parts, which might restrict CO2, as a single factor, to strongly affect the growth of the cultivars [52].

3.2. Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Traits

Mostly, variations in photosynthetic induction are obvious between the crops, and they seem minor among cultivars of the same crop. Ref. [53] found that time until reaching 20–90% of full net photosynthesis rate induction varied by 40–60% through genotypes, while the time needed for photosynthetic induction is a limiting actor and may increase the yields of crops [54]. In addition, increasing the CO2 level cannot always improve photosynthesis. Therefore, selecting the appropriate CO2 supplement based on the photosynthesis characteristics is crucial [55]. To verify the physiological response of the three F1 hybrid strawberries to CO2 enrichment under the greenhouse condition, leaf gas exchange measurements and chlorophyll content were detected (Table 2). The photosynthetic rate (Pr) and intercellular CO2 (Ci) were significantly higher (129.7%, 43.7%), respectively, in leaves of strawberry exposed to 600 ppm than 400 ppm of CO2. A comparable pattern was observed when plants were grown under both CO2 concentrations for the three grown strawberry varieties. Particularly, 600 ppm of CO2 increased the values of the photosynthetic rate (Pr) for varieties D, E and S, while the height values of stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in strawberry leaves were recorded with variety S at 600 ppm of CO2. Ref. [56] showed that elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthesis rate of Albion and San Andreas strawberry cultivars at 650 µmol mol−1 of CO2 with no increase at 900 µmol mol−1. Moreover, there was no significant difference in chlorophyll components between the two CO2 concentrations. Moreover, varieties S and E responded significantly to 400 and 600 ppm of CO2, respectively, in terms of transpiration rate (Tr), chlorophyll b and chlorophyll a+b. Ref. [57] confirmed that CO2 enrichment usually resulted in increased chlorophyll content. Regardless of the significant increase in (Pr) at 600 ppm for the three varieties, no clear pattern under both CO2 concentrations was observed in terms of chlorophyll a and a/b. A similar result was reported by [50], who found a significant increase in photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentration in leaves of watermelon, while transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content did not differ at 800 ppm of CO2 enrichment, if compared to the ambient CO2. In tomato, net photosynthesis was increased significantly with increasing CO2 concentration at all light intensities [58]. For cucumber, short-term CO2 enrichment significantly increased the net photosynthetic rate, while long-term CO2 enrichment led to photosynthetic acclimation and a decrease in stomatal conductance [59]. The net photosynthetic rate of young lettuce plants was much higher with 700 ppm of CO2 enrichment than at the ambient concentration [60]. Likewise, with strawberry, photosynthesis under elevated CO2 was decreased above 600 µmol.mol−1 [61]. However, quite a few studies have revealed that elevated CO2 highly stimulates the carboxylation rate in the Calvin cycle [62] and enhances leaf photosynthesis under greenhouse conditions [24], indicating that CO2 enrichment affected the plant growth of strawberry. Ref. [63] pointed out that elevated CO2 improves the efficiency of Rubisco CO2 assimilation over the alternate RuBP oxygenation, which enhanced plant growth and yield.

3.3. Fruit Yield

With the increase in CO2 concentration, the number of strawberry fruits per plant and total fruit yield resulted in a significant increase for plants treated with 600 ppm of CO2 compared to ambient up to 27.5% and 42.2%, respectively, (Table 3). Clearly, the application of 600 ppm of CO2 increased fruit number, length and diameter for D and S varieties. Furthermore, total yield production increased by 30% and 37.3% for the same varieties, respectively. In terms of variety E, 600 ppm of CO2 did not significantly reflect the fruit size or diameter. Our results are in harmony with [26], who cited that the number of fruit, average fruit weight and total yield of strawberry were significantly higher by 20% and 31% with 800 μmol·mol−1 of CO2 in comparison to 400 μmol·mol−1. In addition, [27] found that strawberry fruit yield and average fruit number were significantly increased by 28.3% and 35.7%, respectively, with CO2 enrichment compared to control, while no significant difference in terms of average fruit weight was observed. The authors of [12] indicated that 700 ppm of CO2 exhibited a significantly higher number of tomato fruit, fruit weight and better yield compared to plants grown under ambient CO2 conditions. The authors of [64] proved that elevated CO2 has a direct effect on mulberry growth, development, nutritional status and yield. Previous reports mentioned that elevated CO2 increased tomato yield from 7% to 125% [65], strawberry total fruit yield from 9.9% to 33.4% [13], and 17.6–38.5% increase in single strawberry fruit weight [65], compared with ambient CO2 conditions. These findings might be attributed to the significant increase in growth traits and photosynthetic apparatus as well as the high carbohydrate accumulation in fruit during the fruit development stage, which in turn resulted in maximum total yield [66]. In harmony, [28] reported that CO2 enrichment results in an increase in vegetable productivity inside the greenhouse up to 32%. Obviously, variety E showed constant lower yield and a smaller number of fruits either under ambient or enrichment CO2, indicating that the genotype of D and S hybrids is more superior once the agroclimatic conditions are equal. A related conclusion was reported by [67], who explained that the difference between cultivars depends upon the agroclimatic conditions, and the best cultivars can only be selected by evaluating for yield under different climatic conditions. In this respect, it could be concluded that the variations in yield might be attributed to the production potential of the experimented hybrids and the differences with respect to climatic requirements [68].

3.4. Fruit Quality

With respect to the effect of CO2 enrichment, the present findings revealed no significant change in total acidity (TA) either between varieties or the CO2 concentrations (Figure 3, Table 4). However, the results show that elevated CO2 at 600 ppm promotes total soluble solids accumulation and vitamin C in fruits. This effect could be explained based on the fact that CO2 enrichment improves the synthesis of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphat in leaves into glucose, fructose, and sucrose [69], which, in turn, increases carbohydrate content in plant organs [70]. In addition, the enhanced photosynthetic rate under CO2 enrichment (Table 2) might be connected to the enhancements in sucrose content [71]. This explanation was investigated by [24], who found that doubling the CO2 concentration from 400 to 800 μmol·mol−1 significantly enhanced the content of sucrose, fructose, and soluble sugars in leaves of bell pepper. Related reports confirmed that CO2 enrichment enhanced soluble sugars in radish, turnip and carrot [16] and increased total soluble sugar in strawberry by 20% in comparison to ambient conditions [72]. The authors of [65] stated that elevated CO2 results in a 7–35% increase in major sugars combined with a 10.2% increase in vitamin C in strawberry fruit. In our study, the interaction between the two CO2 concentrations and the three grown strawberry F1 varieties did not differ in terms of brix content at 600 ppm of CO2. Our results show that vitamin C is improved for all varieties for plants treated at 600 ppm compared to 400 ppm of CO2, while some reports indicate that CO2 enrichment reduced vitamin C content in barely, tomato and potato, with a nonsignificant increase in tomato fruit acidity [73,74,75]. These results suggest that CO2 enrichment could contribute to increasing crop nutritional value; otherwise, species do not have comparable responses to CO2, enrichment, even though the yield increases [76].

3.5. Macronutrient Content

In terms of CO2 enrichment’s influence on mineral content in plant tissue, 600 ppm of CO2 enrichment significantly decreased nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium accumulation in the leaves of exposed plants in comparison to 400 ppm of CO2, except for calcium (Table 5). In respect to the effect of CO2 enrichment on the three grown varieties, the determined nutrients revealed significant increases with varieties E and S, especially, while lower content was found in the leaves of variety D treated with 600 ppm CO2 treatment. Thus, it could be indicated that CO2 enrichment caused a reduction in the concentration of minerals in strawberry leaves, while the variation among varieties might be attributed to the genotype [77]. Several reports documented that elevated CO2 is expected to reduce concentrations of nutrients because of various factors [78]. For instance, elevated CO2 could reduce element concentrations, even if the nutrient uptake is enhanced, but dry matter accumulation outpaces uptake. Likewise, elevated CO2 consistently lowers transpiration and increases water use efficiency and, therefore, may reduce the nutrient uptake for element transfer from soil to plant roots, which is dependent on mass flow [79,80]. Also, [81] showed that elevated CO2 reduced nitrogen content due to nitrogen dilution from increased carbohydrate concentrations, lower nutrient and water uptake from the soil and a reduction in stomatal conductance [82]. Moreover, phosphorus accumulation showed several patterns of either decreased, increased or no-change status [83]. On the other hand, [84] found that potassium and magnesium significantly increased, though phosphorus decreased in asparagus grown under elevated CO2 compared to ambient conditions. Previously, [85] found no effect of elevated CO2 on potassium and magnesium content in tomatoes, despite a nitrogen decrease and calcium increase in rice, as well as potassium decrease in wheat [86]. Therefore, it could be proposed that, under CO2 enrichment, plants might change their nutrient allocation patterns, and nutrient elements might behave differently depending on their chemical properties [87]. Thus, differential responses of N, P and K content because of elevated CO2 might be observed [88]. In conclusion, the response of grown plants under elevated CO2 on mineral uptake and utilization are contradictory and diverse among crop species and experimental capabilities [89].

4. Conclusions

The world of agriculture is witnessing the emergence of new techniques and innovations aimed at improving crop production efficiency and sustainability. One of these innovations is using F1 hybrid strawberry varieties as an alternative to traditional runner-propagated cultivation. This method offers several advantages, including a shorter production period and increased production. CO2 enrichment is considered a sustainable tool to increase production in greenhouses. A significant improvement in the growth traits of the strawberry plants was found when plants were exposed to CO2 enrichment at 600 ppm. The results show that CO2 enrichment significantly enhances the yield and quality of strawberries, which has important relevance for greenhouses in arid areas and can provide feasible technical solutions for local agricultural production. The varieties’ morpho-physiological response to increased CO2 levels demonstrated notable enhancements in photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentrations in leaves. This, in turn, led to a substantial increase in the number of fruits per plant and total fruit yield. In addition, the elevated CO2 levels promoted the accumulation of total soluble solids and vitamin C in the fruit, while the levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium in the leaves of the plants exposed to higher CO2 concentrations decreased. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between CO2 levels and nutritional content in plants. However, it is crucial to tailor the CO2 enrichment strategy based on the specific requirements of each strawberry variety to maximize the yield and quality. In conclusion, this investigation indicates new possibilities for enhancing strawberry cultivation practices in arid zones and highlights the potential of innovative techniques to revolutionize sustainable agricultural production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.A., K.A. and A.A.; methodology, M.O., M.Q. and B.A.; formal analysis, S.A., K.A. and M.O.; investigation and data curation, M.E.A., A.A.-S. and M.O.; statistics M.O. and K.A.; writing original draft preparation, M.E.A. and A.A.-S.; writing review and editing, M.E.A., S.A., B.A. and M.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the National Research and Development Center for Sustainable Agriculture (Estidamah) and King Saud University for scientific and financial support for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vågsholm, I.; Arzoomand, N.S.; Boqvist, S. Food security, safety, and sustainability—Getting the trade-offs right. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Food and Agriculture. Statistical Yearbook. 2021; Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cb4477en (accessed on 1 December 2021).
  3. Goddek, S.; Körner, O.; Keesman, K.J.; Tester, M.A.; Lefers, R.; Fleskens, L.; Joyce, A.; van Os, E.; Gross, A.; Leemans, R. How greenhouse horticulture in arid regions can contribute to climate-resilient and sustainable food security. Glob. Food Secur. 2023, 38, 100701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghoulem, M.; El Moueddeb, K.; Nehdi, E.; Boukhanouf, R.; Calautit, J.K. Greenhouse design and cooling technologies for sustainable food cultivation in hot climates: Review of current practice and future status. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 183, 121–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture. Census Book; Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Available online: https://www.mewa.gov.sa/en/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 19 February 2020).
  6. Ouammi, A.; Achour, Y.; Dagdougui, H.; Zejli, D. Optimal operation scheduling for a smart greenhouse integrated microgrid. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020, 58, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cuce, P.M.; Riffat, S. A state of the art review of evaporative cooling systems for building applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lambers, H.; Chapin, F.S.; Pons, T.L. Plant Physiological Ecology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Achour, Y.; Ouammi, A.; Zejli, D. Technological progresses in modern sustainable greenhouses cultivation as the path towards precision agriculture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 147, 111251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poudel, M.; Dunn, B. Greenhouse Carbon Dioxide Supplementation; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service: Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor, M.; Miller, H.L.; IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; Volume 499–587, pp. 434–497. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rangaswamy, T.C.; Sridhara, S.; Ramesh, N.; Gopakkali, P.; El-Ansary, D.O.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Abdelmohsen, S.A.; Abdelbacki, A.M.; Elansary, H.O.; Abdel-Hamid, A.M.J.P. Assessing the impact of higher levels of CO2 and temperature and their interactions on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plants 2021, 10, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balasooriya, H.N.; Dassanayake, K.B.; Seneweera, S.; Ajlouni, S. Interaction of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa) growth and fruit yield. Int. J. Agric. Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 12, 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kawashima, H.; Takaichi, M.; BaBa, M.; Yasui, K.; Nakano, Y. Effects of energy saving and the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions with a hybrid-heating system using an air-to-air heat pump for greenhouse heating. Bull. Natl. Inst. Veg. Tea Sci. 2008, 7, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gruda, N.; Tanny, J. Protected crops. In Horticulture: Plants for People and Places; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 327–405. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dong, J.; Gruda, N.; Lam, S.K.; Li, X.; Duan, Z. Effects of Elevated CO2 on Nutritional Quality of Vegetables: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hidaka, K.; Nakahara, S.; Yasutake, D.; Zhang, Y.; Okayasu, T.; Dan, K.; Kitano, M.; Sone, K. Crop-local CO2 enrichment improves strawberry yield and fuel use efficiency in protected cultivations. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 301, 111104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Merrill, B.F.; Lu, N.; Yamaguchi, T.; Takagaki, M.; Maruo, T.; Kozai, T.; Yamori, W. Next evolution of agriculture: A review of innovations in plant factories. In Handbook of Photosynthesis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 723–740. [Google Scholar]
  19. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A. Climate change, CO2, and defense: The metabolic, redox, and signaling perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 857–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mortensen, L. Effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on growth and yield of eight vegetable species in a cool climate. Sci. Hortic. 1994, 58, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pérez-López, U.; Miranda-Apodaca, J.; Lacuesta, M.; Mena-Petite, A.; Muñoz-Rueda, A. Growth and nutritional quality improvement in two differently pigmented lettuce cultivars grown under elevated CO2 and/or salinity. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 195, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sánchez-Guerrero, M.; Lorenzo, P.; Medrano, E.; Castilla, N.; Soriano, T.; Baille, A. Effect of variable CO2 enrichment on greenhouse production in mild winter climates. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 132, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on health-promoting compounds and organoleptic properties of tomato fruits grown in greenhouse. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fan, X.; Cao, X.; Zhou, H.; Hao, L.; Dong, W.; He, C.; Xu, M.; Wu, H.; Wang, L.; Chang, Z.; et al. Carbon dioxide fertilization effect on plant growth under soil water stress associates with changes in stomatal traits, leaf photosynthesis, and foliar nitrogen of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 179, 104203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Holley, J.; Mattson, N.; Ashenafi, E.; Nyman, M. The Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Biomass, Carotenoids, Xanthophyll, and Mineral Content of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tagawa, A.; Ehara, M.; Ito, Y.; Araki, T.; Ozaki, Y.; Shishido, Y. Effects of CO2 Enrichment on Yield, Photosynthetic Rate, Translocation and Distribution of Photoassimilates in Strawberry ‘Sagahonoka’. Agronomy 2022, 12, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mochizuki, Y.; Murakami, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Worarad, K.; Yonezu, Y.; Umeda, H.; Okayama, T.; Inoue, E. Local CO2 Application within Strawberry Plant Canopy Increased Dry Matter Production and Fruit Yield in Summer and Autumn Culture. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2022, 22, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, J.; Gruda, N.; Li, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Duan, Z. Sustainable vegetable production under changing climate: The impact of elevated CO2 on yield of vegetables and the interactions with environments—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 253, 119920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Allen, L.; Kimball, B.; Bunce, J.; Yoshimoto, M.; Harazono, Y.; Baker, J.; Boote, K.; White, J.J.A.; Meteorology, F. Fluctuations of CO2 in Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) depress plant photosynthesis, growth, and yield. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 284, 107899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vermeulen, P. Alternative sources of CO2 for the greenhouse horticulture. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium Energy Challenges Mechanics (ISECM2), Aberdeen, UK, 18–20 August 2014; pp. 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuroyanagi, T. History of carbon dioxide application in greenhouses and engineering approach for efficient application. Agric. Hortic. 2014, 89, 143. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karim, M.F.; Hao, P.; Nordin, N.H.B.; Qiu, C.; Zeeshan, M.; Khan, A.A.; Shamsi, I.H. Effects of CO2 enrichment by fermentation of CRAM on growth, yield and physiological traits of cherry tomato. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1041. [Google Scholar]
  33. Henz, G.P. Desafios enfrentados por agricultores familiares na produção de morango no Distrito Federal. Hortic. Bras. 2010, 28, 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Islam, R. Genetic Improvement of Strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duchesne). Adv. Plant Breed. Strateg. Fruits 2018, 3, 217–275. [Google Scholar]
  35. World Food and Agriculture. Statistical Yearbook. 2019. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/ca6463en (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  36. Cervantes, L.; Ariza, M.T.; Miranda, L.; Lozano, D.; Medina, J.J.; Soria, C.; Martínez-Ferri, E. Stability of Fruit Quality Traits of Different Strawberry Varieties under Variable Environmental Conditions. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bentvelsen, G.; Van Der Vange, A. Advances in F1 hybrid day-neutral strawberry breeding at ABZ Seeds, Andijk, The Netherlands. In Proceedings of the IX International Strawberry Symposium, Rimini, Italy, 1–5 May 2021; Volume 1309, pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sonneveld, C.; Voogt, W. Plant Nutrition of Greenhouse Crops; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 393–403. [Google Scholar]
  39. Baur, F.J.; Ensminger, L. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Methods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1977, 54, 171–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bremner, J.M.; Mulvaney, C. Nitrogen total. Methods Soil Anal. 1982, 9, 595–624. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jones, J.B. Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, J.H.; Benitez, A. Chlorophylls: Analysis in plant materials. Mod. Methods Plant Anal. 1955, 4, 142–196. [Google Scholar]
  43. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, J.H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics; McGraw-Hill Book, Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1960; p. 481. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hong, T.; Cai, Z.; Li, R.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on watermelon growth, photosynthesis and yield under CO2 enrichment. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 259, 107229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, D.; Mei, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Z.J.A.J. Carbon dioxide enrichment promoted the growth, yield, and light-use efficiency of lettuce in a plant factory with artificial lighting. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 5196–5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jones, H. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 1–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reddy, A.R.; Rasineni, G.K.; Raghavendra, A.S. The impact of global elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and plant productivity. Curr. Sci. 2010, 99, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jiang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, G.; Zhu, J. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and nitrogen (N) supply on N uptake and utilization of indica and japonica cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Ecol. Process. 2020, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dwivedi, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Mishra, J.S.; Prakash, V.; Rao, K.K.; Bhatt, B.P.; Srivastava, A.K. Interactive effect of elevated [CO2] and temperature on the photosynthetic process, anti-oxidative properties, and grain yield of rice. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2022, 208, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhong, Y.; Blennow, A.; Liang, K.; Liu, F. Effects of elevated CO2 on grain yield and quality in five wheat cultivars. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2022, 208, 733–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ullah, I.; Demirsoy, H.; Soysal, D.; Lizalo, A.; Doğan, D.E.; Demirsoy, L. Evaluation of Strawberry Cultivars Based on Growth-Related Attributes. Appl. Fruit Sci. 2024, 66, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Miyoshi, Y.; Hidaka, K.; Okayasu, T.; Yasutake, D.; Kitano, M. Effects of Local CO2 Enrichment on Strawberry Cultivation during the Winter Season. Environ. Control. Biol. 2017, 55, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, N.; Berman, S.R.; Joubert, D.; Vialet-Chabrand, S.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Kaiser, E. Variation of Photosynthetic Induction in Major Horticultural Crops Is Mostly Driven by Differences in Stomatal Traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Acevedo-Siaca, L.G.; Coe, R.; Wang, Y.; Kromdijk, J.; Quick, W.P.; Long, S.P. Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, J. A high efficiency CO2 concentration interval optimization method for lettuce growth. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 162731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, P.; Mantri, N.; Lou, H.; Hu, Y.; Sun, D.; Zhu, Y.; Dong, T.; Lu, H. Effects of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) at Two Levels of Nitrogen Application. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Miri, H.R.; Rastegar, A.; Bagheri, A.R. The impact of elevated CO2 on growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 crops and weeds. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2012, 2, 1144–1150. [Google Scholar]
  58. Nilsen, S.; Hovland, K.; Dons, C.; Sletten, S.P. Effect of CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis, growth and yield of tomato. Sci. Hortic. 1983, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dabu, X.; Li, S.; Cai, Z.; Ge, T.; Hai, M. The effect of potassium on photosynthetic acclimation in cucumber during CO2 enrichment. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Giri, A.; Armstrong, B.; Rajashekar, C.B. Elevated Carbon Dioxide Level Suppresses Nutritional Quality of Lettuce and Spinach. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Keutgen, N.; Chen, K.; Lenz, F. Responses of strawberry leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and macronutrient contents to elevated CO2. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 150, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zheng, Y.; Li, F.; Hao, L.; Yu, J.; Guo, L.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Zhang, X.; Xu, M. Elevated CO2 concentration induces photosynthetic down-regulation with changes in leaf structure, non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen content of soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kimball, B.A. Crop responses to elevated CO2 and interactions with H2O, N, and temperature. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 31, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lavanya, C.; Ashoka, J.; Sreenivasa, A.; Nadagoud, S.; Beladhadi, B. Effect of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Temperature on Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters of Mulberry. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 3351–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Doddrell, N.H.; Lawson, T.; A Raines, C.; Wagstaff, C.; Simkin, A.J. Feeding the world: Impacts of elevated [CO2] on nutrient content of greenhouse grown fruit crops and options for future yield gains. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Takahashi, Y.; Satoh, T.; Ibe, A.; Shibasaki, N.; Nomizu, K.; Ito, M. Effect of CO2 gas application to the strawberry for green house forcing culture in Niigata region. Bull. Fac. Agric. 2006, 58, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  67. Jan, S.; Baba, J.; Sharma, M.; Wani, T.; Nisar, S.; Angmo, T.; Din, S.; Kossar, S. Evaluation of Different Strawberry Cultivars for Growth, Yield and Quality Characters under Temperate Conditions of North Western Himalayas. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 837–844. [Google Scholar]
  68. Antunes, L.E.C.; Ristow, N.C.; Krolow, A.C.R.; Carpenedo, S.; Júnior, C.R. Yield and quality of strawberry cultivars. Hortic. Bras. 2010, 28, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Long, S.P.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A.; Ort, D.R. RISING ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE: Plants FACE the Future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 591–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Sun, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, X.; Shi, K.; Yu, J. Stimulated Leaf Dark Respiration in Tomato in an Elevated Carbon Dioxide Atmosphere. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Idso, S.B.; Kimball, B.A.; Shaw, P.E.; Widmer, W.; Vanderslice, J.T.; Higgs, D.J.; Montanari, A.; Clark, W. The effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 on the vitamin C concentration of (sour) orange juice. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 90, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, S.; Bunce, J. Elevated carbon dioxide affects fruit flavor in field-grown strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1464–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Robinson, J.M.; Sicher, R.C. Antioxidant levels decrease in primary leaves of barley during growth at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 165, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Högy, P.; Fangmeier, A. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment affects potatoes: 2. Tuber quality traits. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 30, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khan, I.; Azam, A.; Mahmood, A. The impact of enhanced atmospheric carbon dioxide on yield, proximate composition, elemental concentration, fatty acid and vitamin C contents of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 185, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fenech, M.; Amaya, I.; Valpuesta, V.; Botella, M.A. Vitamin C Content in Fruits: Biosynthesis and Regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zeng, Q.; Liu, B.; Gilna, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Ma, H.; Pang, J.; Chen, G.; Zhu, J. Elevated CO 2 effects on nutrient competition between a C 3 crop (Oryza sativa L.) and a C 4 weed (Echinochloa crusgalli L.). Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2011, 89, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gojon, A.; Cassan, O.; Bach, L.; Lejay, L.; Martin, A. The decline of plant mineral nutrition under rising CO2: Physiological and molecular aspects of a bad deal. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Jenny, H. The Soil Resource: Original and Behavior (Ecological Studies) 37; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  81. Taub, D.R.; Wang, X. Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO2? A critical examination of the hypotheses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bloom, A.J.; Burger, M.; Rubio-Asensio, J.S.; Cousins, A.B. Carbon Dioxide Enrichment Inhibits Nitrate Assimilation in Wheat and Arabidopsis. Science 2010, 328, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Huang, W.; Houlton, B.Z.; Marklein, A.R.; Liu, J.; Zhou, G. Plant stoichiometric responses to elevated CO2 vary with nitrogen and phosphorus inputs: Evidence from a global-scale meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sharma, R.; Singh, H. Alteration in biochemical constituents and nutrients partitioning of Asparagus racemosus in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 6812–6821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wheeler, R.; Mackowiak, C.; Stutte, G.; Yorio, N.; Berry, W. Effect of elevated carbon dioxide on nutritional quality of tomato. Adv. Space Res. 1997, 20, 1975–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Loladze, I. Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: Toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Finzi, A.C.; Norby, R.J.; Calfapietra, C.; Gallet-Budynek, A.; Gielen, B.; Holmes, W.E.; Hoosbeek, M.R.; Iversen, C.M.; Jackson, R.B.; Kubiske, M.E.; et al. Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14014–14019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hao, X.; Li, P.; Han, X.; Norton, R.; Lam, S.; Zong, Y.; Sun, M.; Lin, E.; Gao, Z. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on N, P and K uptake of soybean in northern China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2016, 218-219, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, P.; Han, X.; Zong, Y.; Li, H.; Lin, E.; Han, Y.; Hao, X. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on the uptake and utilization of N, P and K in Vigna radiata. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 202, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Periodic of CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment) inside the greenhouse through the growing cycle. The CO2 injection system is regulated by a computerized control system (Horti-Max), the computer is equipped with three sensors that measure the CO2 levels in the greenhouse atmosphere. Based on the sensor’s readings, the computer adjusts the amount of CO2 released from the tank to maintain the desired CO2 concentration within the greenhouse.
Figure 1. Periodic of CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment) inside the greenhouse through the growing cycle. The CO2 injection system is regulated by a computerized control system (Horti-Max), the computer is equipped with three sensors that measure the CO2 levels in the greenhouse atmosphere. Based on the sensor’s readings, the computer adjusts the amount of CO2 released from the tank to maintain the desired CO2 concentration within the greenhouse.
Horticulturae 10 00941 g001
Figure 2. (Left) CO2 tank set out of the greenhouse facilities, while the injection tubes were set under the plant gutter, (Right) which are perforated to disperse air into the ambient (400 ppm) and enrichment (600 ppm) CO2 environment around the strawberry plants.
Figure 2. (Left) CO2 tank set out of the greenhouse facilities, while the injection tubes were set under the plant gutter, (Right) which are perforated to disperse air into the ambient (400 ppm) and enrichment (600 ppm) CO2 environment around the strawberry plants.
Horticulturae 10 00941 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of strawberry fruit quality, 90 days post-cultivation, as affected by the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). TSS: Total soluble solids. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent stander error.
Figure 3. Comparison of strawberry fruit quality, 90 days post-cultivation, as affected by the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). TSS: Total soluble solids. Means marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars represent stander error.
Horticulturae 10 00941 g003
Table 1. Effect of the two CO2 concentrations, 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment), on vegetative growth traits of strawberry plants at 60 days post transplanting for the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Effect of the two CO2 concentrations, 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment), on vegetative growth traits of strawberry plants at 60 days post transplanting for the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
CO2
(ppm)
VarietyPlant Height
(cm)
No. of CrownsCrown Diameter (mm)Leaf Area
(cm2)
No. of
Leaves
Leaves
FW (g)
Leaves
DW (g)
400 30.6 ± 0.61 a2.4 ± 0.21 b19.7 ± 0.80 b847 ± 89.19 b31.6 ± 1.12 b41.6 ± 3.27 b8.8 ± 0.64 b
600 31.5 ± 0.78 a3.3 ± 0.44 a25.1 ± 1.25 a1378 ± 199.13 a53.6 ± 2.74 a95.5 ± 9.92 a13.3 ± 0.95 a
D29.7 ± 0.54 a2.2 ± 0.18 c19.8 ± 0.14 bc816 ± 58.34 cd29.2 ± 1.01 e42.8 ± 1.80 d9.1 ± 0.46 b
400E30.4 ± 1.24 a2.9 ± 0.44 b17.0 ± 0.00 c1005 ± 261.29 c34.7 ± 2.40 d46.3 ± 9.82 d9.3 ± 2.02 b
S31.6 ± 1.36 a2.1 ± 0.29 c22.3 ± 0.80 b720 ± 53.61 d30.6 ± 0.70 de35.8 ± 0.57 d8.1 ± 0.32 b
600D29.1 ± 0.52 a2.9 ± 0.33 b23.1 ± 0.60 b2068 ± 144.53 a61.2 ± 1.4742 a90.2 ± 0.98 b15.6 ± 1.28 a
E31.5 ± 1.03 a3.5 ± 0.05 a22.0 ± 0.80 a745 ± 98.36 d44.3 ± 2.3643 c64.7 ± 2.02 c10.0 ± 0.70 b
S33.9 0.56 a3.2 ± 0.44 a29.8 ± 0.54 a1321 ± 70.70 b55.7 ± 2.8591 b131.9 ± 4.87 a14.1 ± 0.95 a
Table 2. Effect of the two CO2 concentrations, 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment), on photosynthesis traits at 60 days post cultivation, for the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Pr: Photosynthetic rate, Gs: stomatal conductance, Ci: intercellular CO2, Tr: Transpiration rate. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Effect of the two CO2 concentrations, 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment), on photosynthesis traits at 60 days post cultivation, for the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Pr: Photosynthetic rate, Gs: stomatal conductance, Ci: intercellular CO2, Tr: Transpiration rate. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
CO2VarietyPr
(μmol.
m−2. S−1)
Gs
(mmol
H2O.m−1. s−1)
Ci
(μmol
CO2.mol−1)
Tr
(mmol
H2O.m−1. s−1)
Chlorophyll
a
Chlorophyll
b
Chlorophyll
(a+b)
Chlorophyll
(a/b)
(ppm)
400 7.45 ± 0.62 b0.440 ± 0.03 a343 ± 4.61 b9.21 ± 0.31 a3.01 ± 0.01 a3.45 ± 0.16 a6.46 ± 0.15 a0.89 ± 0.05 a
600 17.11 ± 1.73 a0.446 ± 0.02 a493 ± 7.71 a9.82 ± 0.32 a2.96 ± 0.02 a3.85 ± 0.22 a6.81 ± 0.19 a0.78 ± 0.05 a
400D9.74 ± 0.40 b0.453 ± 0.09 a329 ± 7.43 d9.20 ± 0.93 b3.07 ± 0.33 a2.87 ± 0.04 b5.94 ± 0.04 b1.07 ± 0.02 a
E5.67 ± 0.16 c0.443 ± 0.05 a356 ± 2.16 c9.82 ± 0.31 ab2.99 ± 0.02 ab3.59 ± a 0.21 b6.59 ± 0.19 ab0.84± 0.06 ab
S6.95 ± 0.36 c0.426 ± 0.02 b344 ± 2.29 cd8.63 ± 0.20 b2.97 ± 0.38 ab3.89 ± 0.09 a6.86 ± 0.8 a0.76 ±0.20 b
600D17.74 ± 1.07 a0.430 ± 0.37 b475 ±5.74 b9.83 ± 0.11 ab2.95 ± 0.03 b3.84 ± 0.35 ab6.48 ± 0.29 ab0.88 ± 0.08 ab
E17.21 ± 1.24 a0.466 ± 0.01 a482 ± 5.33 b10.71 ± 0.33 a2.91 ± 0.52 b4.26 ± 0.42 a7.17 ± 0.38 a0.70 ± 0.09 b
S16.60 ± 0.90 a0.443 ± 0.26 a520 ± 7.81 a8.92 ± 0.22 b3.01 ± 0.04 ab3.47 ± 0.33 ab6.80 ± 0.32 ab0.78 ± 0.07 b
Table 3. Effect of the two CO2 levels at 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment) on yield and its components for the three F1-strawberry cultivars, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of the two CO2 levels at 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment) on yield and its components for the three F1-strawberry cultivars, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
CO2 Variety Fruit Length
(mm)
Fruit Diameter (mm)Fruit FW (g)No. Fruits (Plant)Yield
(ppm)(g/Plant)
400 37.1 ± 2.86 a26.3 ± 1.79 a19.2 ± 0.73 a34.9 ± 2.15 b678 ± 52.83 b
600 37.5 ± 2.51 a26.9 ± 1.90 a21.1 ± 1.53 a44.5 ± 2.55 a964 ± 114.34 a
400D41.1 ± 1.95 a29.8 ± 0.71 ab20.0 ± 0.68 bc37.6 ± 0.88 b750 ± 10.17 d
E26.3 ± 1.99 b19.4 ± 0.98 c16.8 ± 0.11 cd28.0 ± 3.79 c471 ± 5.25 f
S44.0 ± 0.60 a30.1 ± 0.53 b20.7 ± 1.23 b39.3 ± 1.58 b813 ±11.84 c
600D39.9 ± 1.91 a29.3 ± 0.72 b22.8 ± 0.67 b46.8 ± 1.83 a1067 ± 24.86 b
E29.4 ± 4.18 b19.6 ± 0.83 c15.2 ± 0.63 d34.8 ± 2.09 b528 ± 4.04 e
S43.3 ± 1.29 a31.9 ± 0.74 a25.0 ± 1.96 a51.9 ± 0.79 a1297 ± 27.13 a
Table 4. Assessment of strawberry fruit quality, 90 days post cultivation, as affected by the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana, S: Soraya, and the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). TSS: Total soluble solids. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Assessment of strawberry fruit quality, 90 days post cultivation, as affected by the three F1 strawberry varieties, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana, S: Soraya, and the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). TSS: Total soluble solids. Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
CO2
(ppm)
VarietyTSS
(Brix %)
Vitamin C
(mg/100 g FW Fruit)
Total Acidity
(gm/100 mL Citric Acid)
400D9.533 ± 0.08 ab66.67 ± 1.09 d0.7067 ± 0.65 a
E8.733 ± 0.27 b82.93 ± 2.53 c0.71 ± 0.06 a
S10.2 ± 0.36 a80.27 ± 1.18 c0.6233 ± 0.09 a
600D10.167 ± 0.52 a82.4 ± 1.28 c0.6267 ± 0.03 a
E10.067 ± 0.13 a102.8 ± 1.66 a0.6333 ± 0.02 a
S10.3 ± 0.10 a94 ± 1.38 b0.6733 ± 0.02 a
Table 5. Nutrient content in strawberry leaves, 60 days post-cultivation, for the three F1-strawberry cultivars, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya, as affected by the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Nutrient content in strawberry leaves, 60 days post-cultivation, for the three F1-strawberry cultivars, D: Delizzimo, E: Estavana and S: Soraya, as affected by the two CO2 concentrations 400 ppm (ambient) and 600 ppm (enrichment). Means, in the same column, marked by the same lower-case letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
CO2
(ppm)
VarietyN %P %K %Ca %Mg %
400 2.79 ± 0.03 a0.98 ± 0.10 a0.60 ± 0.02 a1.94 ± 0.21 b0.55 ± 0.03 a
600 2.37 ± 0.02 a0.80 ± 0.06 a0.47 ± 0.03 a2.55 ± 0.23 a0.42 ± 0.02 a
400D2.81 ± 0.05 a0.92 ± 0.03 ab0.54± 0.04 b1.46 0.04 c0.51 ± 0.02 b
E2.75 ± 0.01 a1.03 ± 0.39 a0.62 ± 0.02 a2.36 ± 0.52 b0.64 ± 0.04 a
S2.83 ± 0.04 a1.01± 0.03 a0.66 ± 0.04 a2.00 ± 0.09 b0.50 ± 0.04 b
600D2.39 ± 0.02 a0.65 ± 0.03 c0.39 ± 0.02 c1.86 ± 0.34 bc0.37 ± 0.04 c
E2.36 ± 0.10 b0.86 ± 0.02 b0.48 ± 0.06 ab2.94 ± 0.03 a0.48 ± 0.06 ab
S2.38 ± 0.85 b0.91 ± 0.16 ab0.54 ± 0.04 b2.83 ± 0.07 ab0.43 ± 0.03 b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osman, M.; Qaryouti, M.; Alharbi, S.; Alghamdi, B.; Al-Soqeer, A.; Alharbi, A.; Almutairi, K.; Abdelaziz, M.E. Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of F1 Hybrid Strawberry Grown under Controlled Greenhouse Condition. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090941

AMA Style

Osman M, Qaryouti M, Alharbi S, Alghamdi B, Al-Soqeer A, Alharbi A, Almutairi K, Abdelaziz ME. Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of F1 Hybrid Strawberry Grown under Controlled Greenhouse Condition. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(9):941. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090941

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osman, Mohamed, Muein Qaryouti, Saif Alharbi, Budour Alghamdi, Abdulrahman Al-Soqeer, Abdulaziz Alharbi, Khalid Almutairi, and Mohamed Ewis Abdelaziz. 2024. "Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of F1 Hybrid Strawberry Grown under Controlled Greenhouse Condition" Horticulturae 10, no. 9: 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090941

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop