Antiferromagnetism and Structure of Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F Oxyfluoride Perovskites

Abstract

Recently, a series of oxyfluorides, Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F with x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 obtained through a novel synthesis route, were characterized by X-ray and neutron powder diffraction (NPD), magnetization measurements, and ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy (MS). The diffraction data revealed random occupancy of Sr and Ba atoms at the A-cation site, and a statistical distribution of O and F at the anionic sublattice of the perovskite-like structure specified in space group Pm-3m. MS spectra analysis consistently indicated the presence of Fe³⁺ ions at B-site, confirming the Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F stoichiometry. Magnetic structure determination from the NPD data at room temperature established G-type antiferromagnetic arrangement in all compositions with Fe³⁺ moments of about 3.5 μB oriented along the c axis. In this study, we present and analyze additional NPD data concerning the low-temperature chemical and magnetic structure of Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F (x = 0.5) and SrFeO₂F (x = 0). Basically, the three-dimensional G-type magnetic structure is maintained down to 2 K, where it is fully developed with an ordered magnetic moment of 4.25(5) μ_B/Fe at this temperature for x = 0.5 and 4.14(3) μ_B/Fe for x = 0. The data processing is complemented with a new approach to analyze the temperature dependence of the magnetic order T_N on the lattice parameters, based on the magnetic hyperfine fields extracted from the temperature-dependent MS data.

1. Introduction

Recently, several papers have addressed the synthesis and properties of oxyfluoride perovskites Sr_1−xBa_xMO₂F (M = transition metal) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This type of perovskite exhibits a mixed anion sublattice, which incorporates both oxygen and fluoride atoms, and may display appealing properties. The insertion of fluoride ions into transition metal oxides leads to a change in the transition metals’ oxidation states, which involves the intention of modifying their electronic structure and thus changing their magnetic and electrical properties. In fact, they have attracted a lot of attention since the discovery of superconductivity in cuprate oxyfluorides of Sr₂CuO₂F_2+x stoichiometry [6].

Since direct solid-state reactions may only yield thermodynamically stable simple oxyfluorides, topotactic reactions from suitable oxide precursors with the adequate crystal structure are preferred for fluorination. These involve low-temperature treatments with appropriate fluorinating agents. For this reason, low-temperature reagents such as F₂ gas, NH₄F, MF₂ (M = Cu, Ni, Zn), or XeF₂ are usually utilized. Some sophisticated synthetic pathways of several stages, such as the preparation of SrFeO₂F starting from SrFeO_3−δ, have been published [7,8].

A new, simpler synthesis procedure implying the treatment of oxide precursors with a F-containing polymer (polyvinylidene fluoride) has been implemented, and it was successful for the synthesis of such oxyfluorides as SrFeO₂F, BaFeO₂F, Ca₂CuO₂F₂, and Sr₂TiO₃F₂ [9,10,11,12]. The compounds of the series Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F were prepared and studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) by Clemens et al. [13]. In their pioneering work, they described these oxyfluorides as cubic perovskites, independently of the concentration, x, defined in the space group Pm-3m [13]. Later on, BaFeO₂F, Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F and SrFeO₂F were studied by ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy (MS), determining that a single Fe³⁺ valence is present in the octahedral sites, as was also verified from neutron powder diffraction (NPD) data, especially for the compound BaFeO₂F [9,10,14,15]. Indeed, the problem of the formation and the physical properties of oxyfluoride perovskites is one of the most important in condensed matter physics, and a significant number of publications have been devoted to it in the last years [12,13,14,15].

In this paper, we report on complementary data for the oxides of nominal composition Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75) regarding low-temperature NPD data that permitted the resolution of the magnetic structures for the perovskites with x = 0 and x = 0.50. We additionally analyzed the temperature dependence of the magnetic order T_N on the lattice parameters, based on the magnetic hyperfine fields extracted from the temperature-dependent MS data.

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Structure and Magnetic Interaction Energy of Oxyfluoride Perovskites

Neutron powder diffraction and Mössbauer data analysis of the perovskite series Sr_1−x Ba_xFeO₂F showed a cubic structure with the group Pm-3m. A view of the crystal structure is illustrated in Figure 1 [5,13]. In this family, the a lattice parameter can be expressed as:

$$a(x)={{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j=1}^2\sqrt[3]{\frac{V_j}{Z_j}}.x_j$$

(1)

which depends on the concentration x_j (Ba/Sr) of barium/strontium elements, and it expresses the lattice parameter a as a function of x; V_j, Z_j—volume and atomic number of elements. For the perovskite series Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F, the expression for the lattice parameter takes the form:

a_x = x_Sr (V_Sr/Z_Sr)^1/3 + x_Ba (V_Ba/Z_Ba)^1/3, yielding
a_x = (1 − x) a_Sr + x. a_Ba

(2)

where x stands for the content of Ba, and a_Sr and a_Ba are the ionic sizes of elements Sr²⁺ and Ba²⁺ cations.

The Hamiltonian for the Fe atom in the perovskite series Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F is usually composed by electronic Zeeman interaction, the exchange between the spin of four Fe atoms, hyperfine interactions between nuclear spin and electronic spin, nuclear Zeeman interaction, and the nuclear quadrupole interaction. It has the form:

$$\mathrm{H}={\mu }_B{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j}H.g.S+\frac{1}{2}{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{i,j;i\ne j}{J}_{ij}.S_i.S_j.+{{\displaystyle \sum }}_i{S}_i.A_i.I_i-{\mu }_N{{\displaystyle \sum }}_i{g}_n.H.J_i+e^2{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{i}Q\frac{{\left(V_{zz}\right)}_i}{4I\left(2I-1\right)}\left[3I_{zi}^2-I^2+\frac{n_i}{2}\left(I_{+}^2-I_{-}^2\right)\right]$$

(3)

where S_i, I_i, J_ij, A_i, V_zz, n_i, μ_B, μ_N, g_i, g_n and e are the electronic spin, nuclear spin of iron atoms; the exchange coupling between electronic spin; magnetic hyperfine coupling; the nuclear quadrupole moment; gradient electrical field; Bohr magneton; nuclear magneton; and electronic g-factor, nuclear g-factor and electronic charge, respectively. The Mössbauer data showed that the magnetic interaction energy is 340 times greater than electrical quadrupole energy in the sextet: ξ(sextet at 77 K)/ξ(quadrupole splitting) = (17.38 mms⁻¹/0.05 mms⁻¹) ≈ 347, so we focus only on the magnetic hyperfine interaction between the Fe atoms.

The interaction magnetic energy between two atoms Fe is usually expressed [16,17] as:

$$\mathsf{\xi }=\frac{{\mu }_1{\mu }_{2-3\left({\mu }_{1. }e\right)\left({\mu }_{2. }e\right)}}{a^3}.\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }, {\mu }_i=g.{\mu }_B.S_{\mathrm{i}}, i=1, 2$$

where ${\mu }_{i.}$, S_i—magnetic moment and spin of each atom Fe, ${\mu }_m$—magnetic permeability of medium, ${\mu }_B$—Bohr’s magneton, e = $\frac{\left\{x,y,z\right\}}{{\left(x^{2+}{y}^2+z^2\right)}^{3/2}}$—unity vector between two atoms Fe, one of them in position {0, 0, 0} and the other in position {x, y, z}.

In the members of the Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F perovskite series (antiferromagnetic below T_N), it is necessary to calculate all the contributions of each atom in the neighborhood of a given central atom. For this purpose, assuming that the central atom is in position {0,0,0}, we will have a magnetic moment μ₁ along the positive z-axis ($\uparrow )$, the second atom in position {x, y, z} will have moment μ₂{0, 0, (−1)^x+y+z} oriented positively on the direction of the z-axis ($\uparrow$) if the sum (x + y + z) is even, or negative direction of the z-axis ($\downarrow$) if the sum is odd. The interaction energy can be expressed as [18,19,20]:

$$\xi =\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{-N}^N{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{-N}^N{{\displaystyle \sum }}_{-N}^N\frac{{\mu }_1{\mu }_2{\left(-1\right)}^{x+y+z}-3{\mu }_1{\mu }_2\frac{{\left(-1\right)}^{x+y+z}x{z}^2}{x^{2+y^2+z^2}}}{a^3{\left(x^2+y^2+z^2\right)}^{\raisebox{1ex}{$3$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$2$}\right.}}$$

(4)

where N indicates the number of atoms with coordinates {x, y, z} in the vicinity of the central atom in position {0, 0, 0}. In this type of perovskite, we have identified the following magnetic couplings: antiferromagnetic coupling (AFM) and ferromagnetic coupling (FM) for N = 1, as shown in Figure 2, where J₁ and J₅ are AFM, J₂ and J₃ are FM, and the contribution of J₄ is AFM is zero due to its position vector {a, a, a} with its unit vector e = {1/√3,1/√3,1/√3}, giving a null interaction energy in Equation (4).

$$\xi =[-{\mu }_1.{\mu }_2+3({\mu }_1.e)({\mu }_2.e)]/a^3=[-{\mu }_1.{\mu }_2 - 3 {\mu }_1.{\mu }_2 (\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}})(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}})]/a^3=0$$

This hyperfine interaction energy will be equal to the product (K_B.T_N) due to molecular vibration by heat, where K_B is the Boltzmann constant and T_N the Néel temperature:

$$K_B. T_N=\beta . \frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3}$$

(4a)

where the β parameter of proportionality can be evaluated using data obtained by MS data of the perovskite SrFeO₂F.

2.2. Experimental Section

2.2.1. NPD Data Acquisition

Low-temperature NPD patterns were collected for Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F (x = 0, 0.5) at the high-flux D20 neutron diffractometer of the Institut Laue Langevin (Grenoble-France), coupled with a standard orange cryostat. The samples were contained in vanadium cans. A wavelength of 2.40 Å was selected from a graphite monochromator. Good statistical patterns were collected at the lowest temperature (2 K) for 1 h, then a sequential collection was launched in the 2–160 K interval, with step of 20 K and an acquisition time of 10 min for each diagram. The patterns were refined by the Rietveld method [21] using the Fullprof refinement program [22]. A pseudo-Voigt function was chosen to generate the line shape of the diffraction peaks. No regions were excluded in the refinement. In the final run, the following parameters were refined: scale factor, background coefficients, zero-point error, unit-cell parameters, pseudo-Voigt corrected for asymmetry parameters, positional coordinates, and isotropic displacement factors. For the G-type magnetic structure, the magnitude of the Fe magnetic moment as also refined. The coherent scattering lengths for Sr, Ba, Fe, O and F atoms were 7.020, 5.079, 9.45, 5.803 and 5.654 fm, respectively.

2.2.2. Mössbauer Spectroscopy

The Mössbauer spectrum was collected utilizing a conventional spectrometer with a ⁵⁷Co/Rh source, in transmission mode. The signal-to-noise ratio was optimized, avoiding saturation with a sample thickness of 10 mg of natural Fe/cm². The spectra were analyzed by means of a nonlinear fit, and the MIF-Mössbauer integral fit program was used, based on the approximation of an integral Lorentzian line shape [23,24,25]. The high-temperature measurements were carried out in an NB sample holder, whereas for the low-temperature range, a second one with Be windows was used. For the Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F (x = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75) oxides, the ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectra were recorded at 77 K using liquid nitrogen, 300 K (room temperature), and, in a specially designed furnace, at 373 K, 473 K, 573 K, 673 K, 723 K, 823 K, 873 K and 923 K. The isomer shifts (IS) of the spectra refer to the centroid of an α-fe foil (6 μm) reference spectrum at room temperature (RT) [23].

3. Results and Discussion

Neutron diffraction experiments (NPD) at RT were described in a previous publication [1], assessing that all the compounds of the Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F series crystallize with cubic symmetry, defined in the Pm-3m space group. At RT, NPD data already show the presence of a magnetic structure well known as G-type, since the Néel temperature (T_N) of these compounds is well superior to RT. In the present study, we aimed at investigating the low-temperature crystal and magnetic structures, in order to examine the totally consolidated magnetic array, as well as to check the persistence of the cubic structural arrangement at 2 K. It is well known that the determination of the O positions in oxide networks is difficult by X-ray diffraction, given the weak scattering factor for O²⁻ ions; hence, neutron diffraction measurements are essential. It is also known that many ABO₃ perovskite oxides that are cubic at RT may experience phase transitions at lower temperatures, with a reduction in symmetry due to the tilting of BO₆ octahedra, giving rise to superstructure peaks in the diffraction patterns.

The low-temperature crystal structures of Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F (x = 0, 0.5) could indeed be refined in the cubic Pm-3m space group down to 2 K. There were no symptoms of any reduction in symmetry down to the lowest temperature for the two studied compositions. In the cubic model, Sr and Ba are statistically distributed at the 1b Wyckoff sites (½, ½, ½); Fe is located at 1a positions (0, 0, 0), whereas there is a unique oxygen and fluorine, distributed at random at 3c (½, 0, 0) sites. As O and F exhibit very similar scattering lengths, their relative occupancy could not be refined. Thus, the average structure observed by NPD is cubic since the long-range order of the anion displacements, if any, should be suppressed by the structural disorder arising from the random distribution of oxide and fluoride ions. Figure 3a,b illustrate the goodness of the fit for the NPD data for SrFeO₂F and Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F, respectively. The following unit-cell parameters were refined at 2 K: a = 3.9165(3) Å, V = 60.075(7) ų for x = 0, and a = 3.9624(2) Å, V = 62.212(5) ų for x = 0.5. The observed expansion for x = 0.5 was expected because of the superior ionic radius of Ba²⁺ vs. Sr²⁺.

The patterns did not show any additional reflections other than those coming from the G-type antiferromagnetic structure, defined with a propagation vector k = (½, ½, ½). This is characterized by a perfect antiferromagnetic coupling between Fe spins along the three crystallographic directions. No canting was detected from our NPD data. The propagation vector k = (½, ½, ½) implies that there are intense additional peaks in the NPD patterns. These magnetic peaks correspond to the second series of tick marks present in Figure 3a,b.

The magnetic structure was thus modeled with collinear Fe spins directed along the c axis, as shown in Figure 4a. At 2 K, the magnetic arrangement is fully developed, with refined magnetic moments for Fe of 4.14(3) µB/Fe for x = 0 and 4.25(5) µB/Fe for x = 0.5 at the lowest temperature of 2 K. The evolution of the ordered magnetic moments in the studied temperature range 2–160 K is very subtle, since the antiferromagnetic ordering temperature, T_N, in much superior to RT (Figure 4b). The variation in unit-cell parameters in this T interval is represented in Figure 4c, where the expected unit-cell expansion is observed.

Mössbauer Analysis

The Mössbauer spectra of the perovskites with x = 0 (SrFeO₂F) and x = 0.5 (Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F) are illustrated in Figure 5a,b. The spectra at 300 K and 77 K, respectively, can be deconvoluted into two doublets and three sextets. From the FIR of the spectra, the hyperfine magnetic field can be obtained. It decreases upon temperature raising from 77 K to 723 K (not shown). The magnetic fields from the three sextets are 56.19 T, 54.11 T, and 52.24 T, the ratio μ_g/μ_e (magnetic moment ground state/excited state) = −1.75098606, −1.75075075, and −1.75113122, and using the expression D16 = c.H_hyp(μ_g − 3μ_e)/E_γ where c is the speed of light in vacuum (m/s), H_hyp in T, and D16 in mm/s (distance between the first and sixth peak) Eγ = 14.413 keV, we obtained the values for the magnetic moments at 77 K and 300 K.

The spectrum collected at 773 K only displays two doublets, demonstrating that the magnetic transition is placed below this temperature. The isomer shifts (IS) are symptomatic of the Fe³⁺ presence. IS also varies with temperature, as expected from the second-order Doppler shift. Plotting the variation of the hyperfine magnetic field with the temperature, we see that is very similar to the one calculated by the magnetic field expression (7), where Bo stands for the magnetic hyperfine field at 0 K (Bo = 57 T) and T_N is the magnetic ordering temperature. In our calculation, B = 55.5 T at 77 K, B = 1.9 T at 300 K, B = 39.1 T at 573 K, and B = 19.4 T at 723 K. Using these values in the previous formula, we obtain T_N = 739.8 K and Bo = 57.6 T. The value of T_N is higher than that previously reported (T_N = 685 K [14,26]) and the one determined by temperature-dependent NPD [8] located somewhere between 698 K and 723 K. This discrepancy can be related to a slightly different content of F (associated with the presence of SrF₂ in the NPD patterns [8]) and a concomitantly higher oxidation state of Fe. In our measurements at 723 K, we are still not in the paramagnetic region, in contrast to the spectrum previously reported at 700 K in [22], which already corresponds to a paramagnetic state. This is the case in our 773 K spectrum, where two doublets are observed, corresponding to the paramagnetic phase. At 923 K, there is only one doublet with a relative area of 29.90% and a singlet with a relative area of 70.08%, both characteristic of Fe³⁺. The Mössbauer spectra for Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F at 77 K and 300 K show three magnetic sextets and two doublets. They are symptomatic of the presence of Fe³⁺ (Figure 5, Table 2). The hyperfine magnetic fields of the three sextets decreases when the temperature increases to 673 K, taking the values of 27.64 T, 25.19 T, and 23.04 T. The 773 K spectrum displays two doublets, indicative of the paramagnetic state with IS 0.19 mms⁻¹ and QS of 0.85 mms⁻¹ for the first doublet and the second doublet with IS 0.15 mms⁻¹ and QS: 1.00 mms⁻¹. Both doublets are also characteristic of Fe³⁺. The spectrum at 873 K is a singlet with IS = 0.26 mms⁻¹. Using the Mössbauer data, the hyperfine magnetic field at 0 K is B₀ = 57.85 T and the Néel temperature, T_N = 716.31 K, in contrast to literature claiming that the onset of antiferromagnetic ordering occurs at T_N~670(±10) K [15].

4. Discussion

The parameter of proportionality β commented on before in expression (4a) was evaluated using the results of MS data obtained:

$$\mathsf{\beta }=\frac{1.38\times {10}^{-23}\times {\left(3.955\times {10}^{-10}\right)}^3\times 739.5}{\left(\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$2$}\right.\right){\left(3.63\times 9.274\times {10}^{-24}\right)}^2}=2 \times 5.5744 \times {10}^{-4},$$

where β is equivalent to β = 1.31 and $\frac{\mu m}{4\pi }$ μ_m stands for the magnetic permeability of medium.

The calculation of expression (4) was performed using the program Mathematica taking for N different values from N = 1 to N = 50:

$$\mathsf{\xi } (\mathrm{N}=1)/(\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }\frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3})=-1.29289;$$

$$\mathsf{\xi } (\mathrm{N}=2)/(\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }\frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3})=-1.31228;$$

$$\mathsf{\xi } (\mathrm{N}=3)/(\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }\frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3})=-1.3190;$$

$$\mathsf{\xi } (\mathrm{N}=4)/(\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }\frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3})=-1.3219$$

$$\mathsf{\xi } (\mathrm{N}=50)/(\frac{{\mu }_m}{4\pi }\frac{{\mu }_{1 }{\mu }_{2 }}{a^3})=-1.32294$$

We see that when we increase the number of atoms near the central atom, in this case to N = 50, the interaction energy stabilizes up to a certain value, and in this case β takes a value of 1.3219.

In a previous work [1], the dependence of the Néel temperature with the lattice parameter—a (1) was expressed as:

T_N(x) = T_No. exp (−k.x²),

(5)

where k is a constant with a value of 0.13775, which is the slope of curve log_e T_N(x)″ vs. x².

If we use the constant k_o related to the lattice parameters of perovskite Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F, a_x, and its concentration, x, the content of (Ba/Sr): k_o = $\frac{\Delta a}{\Delta x}=\frac{a_{Ba-}{a}_{Sr} }{1-0}=0.1060$. In expression (5), the constant k can be compared to k_o. If we use logarithm of base b = 3.6544, we get the following relation (Figure 6a,b): Log_b (T_N/T_No) = −k_o.x².

Then T_Nx = T_No$b^{-ko.x^2}$. Making some changes, the expression takes the form, T_Nx = T_No.$b^{-{\left(a_x-a_{Sr}\right)}^2/ko}$ or:

$$T_{\mathit{Nx}}=T_{\mathit{No}} b^{-[{\left(\mathrm{ax}- \mathrm{aSr}\right)}^2/\left(\mathrm{aBa}- \mathrm{aSr}\right)]}$$

(6)

where a_x and a_Sr are the lattice parameters of the perovskites, and T_{Nx and} T_N0 are the Néel temperature of Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F and SrFeO₂F perovskites, respectively. We see that log_b (T_N/T_No) has a linear dependence on x² with a constant of proportionality k_o’, which is equivalent to k_o = 0.106011. This is the same proportionality constant k_o of the lattice parameter <a> as a function of concentration x − ko = $\frac{\Delta a}{\Delta x}=\frac{a_{Ba-}{a}_{Sr} }{1-0}$ = 0.10509.

The thermal evolution of the magnetic hyperfine field for this perovskite series may be articulated as:

B = B_o(1 − (T/T_N0 exp[−0.13775x²])^α

with α = 0.273 and T_N0 stands for the temperature of antiferromagnetic ordering of the perovskite with x = 0 (SrFeO₂F).

B_hyp is the magnetic hyperfine field, given by:

B = B_o (1 − T/T_N)^α

(7)

where B_o is the magnetic hyperfine field at 0 K, (B_o = 57 T) and the α parameter usually varies in the range 0.25 < α < 0.33. From our spectrum, we obtain α = 0.2736, for the magnetic order temperature T_N = 740.8 K, for x = 0.0 and the hyperfine magnetic field (at 0 K) B_o = 57.6 T. (See

Table 1. Structural parameters and reliability factors for Sr_1−xBa_xFeO_3−yF_y, obtained from NPD data at room temperature (300 K) and the relations (T_N/T_N0), log_b (T_N/T_N0).

x (Ba Content)	0	0.25	0.50	0.75
a (Å)	3.95500(7)	3.98055(6)	4.00610(5)	4.03476(6)
V (Å3)	61.864(2)	63.071(2)	64.293(1)	65.683(2)
TN (K)	740.08	733.10	715.31	683.40
TN/TNo	1	0.99056	0.96788	0.922873
Logb (TN/TNo), b = 3.6544	0	−0.0073122	0.0251911	−0.061920
Sr/Ba 1b (½ ½ ½)
B (Å2)	0.80(4)	0.81(3)	0.87(3)	0.84(3)
Fe 1a (0 0 0)
B (Å2)	1.62(4)	1.89(3)	2.29(3)	2.68(3)
μB	3.63(4)	3.50(3)	3.37(3)	3.40(2)
O/F 3d (0 0 ½)
B (Å2)	2.36(4)	1.55(3)	1.30(3)	1.10(2)
Occupancy O/F	1	1	0.98(1)	0.96(1)
Main bond distances (Å)
Sr-O/F (×12)	2.79661(4)	2.81467(3)	2.83274(2)	2.85301(3)
Fe-O/F (×6)	1.97750(4)	1.99028(3)	2.00305(2)	2.01738(3)

,

Table 2. Position of the peaks of the Mossbauer spectrum of perovskites SrFeO₂F and Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F (marked as A-first peak, B, C, D, E, F-sixth peak), the magnetic hyperfine field and the magnetic moment for SrFeO₂F and Sr_0.5Ba_0.5FeO₂F.

Peaks	A	B	C	D	E	F	SrFeO2F	Hhyp/T	T/K
Sextet	−8.685	−4.981	−1.178	1.678	5.481	9.385	[mm/s]	56.19
	µ = 0.093104		[mm/Ts] = 4.475963		[neV/T] = 3.69182		Nuclear Bohr magn.		77
Sextet	−8.205	−4.414	−0.783	1.943	5.574	9.045	[mm/s]	53.64	300
	µ = 0.093102		[mm/Ts] = 4.475886		[neV/T] = 3.691757		Nuclear Bohr magn.
							Sr0.5Ba0.5FeO2F
Sextet	−9.424	−5.551	−1.678	1.23	5.13	9.976	[mm/s]	57.22
	µ = 0.097348		[mm/Ts] = 4.680003		[neV/T] = 3.860115		Nuclear Bohr magn.		77
Sextet	−8.18	−4.36	−0.739	1.979	5.6	9.02	[mm/s]	53.48	T/K
	µ = 0.09311		[mm/Ts] = 4.476243		[neV/T] = 3.692051		Nuclear Bohr magn.		300

and

Table 3. The Predicted by formula (9) and Observed magnetic hyperfine field B (x, T) depending of concentration (x) and temperature (T/K) for the series of perovskites Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F.

$\mathrm{B}(x,\mathrm{T})=56.0{\left(1-\frac{T}{740.08}{b}^{0.10611.x^2}\right)}^{\frac{1}{b}}$, b = 3.6544
x\T[K]	77	300	473	573	673	723	740.08
0.00	54.34|54.11	48.57|51.62	42.37|-	37.26|39.18	29.03|-	19.96|-	0|0
0.25	54.32|56.00	48.49|51.62	42.19|-	36.96|38.87	28.32|-	17.63|15.59	-
0.50	54.28|55.35	48.25|51.00	41.63|44.47	35.98|37.94	25.79|25.18	-
0.75	54.20|56.59	47.83|50.53	40.62|-	34.11|37.31	18.51|-	-	-
1.00	54.08|-	47.18|-	39.00|-	30.73|-	-	-	-

).

A further analysis of the variation of Neel’s temperature T_N from the Ba contents x shows that the temperature has an exponential dependence on <x²> (Figure 7). $Lo{g}_b=-Ko{X}^2$ , where K_o = 0.10611, which is, in fact, the constant of proportionality of the lattice parameter of the perovskite Sr_1−xBa_xFeO₂F, then

$${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{Nx}}=T_{\mathrm{No}}{b}^{-ko{X}^2}.$$

(8)

The variation of the magnetic field with the increase of temperature for all the series of this perovskites model may be expressed as B(x,T) = B ${\left(1-\frac{T}{T_{Nx}}\right)}^{\alpha }$, where T_Nx is the Neel’s temperature of the perovskite with concentration x, then the expression for the variation of hyperfine magnetic field from temperature and its concentration, B(x, T) takes the form:

$$\mathrm{B}(x,\mathrm{T})={\mathrm{B}}_0 {\left[1-\frac{T}{T_{N0}}{\propto }^{-k{X}^2}\right]}^{\alpha }$$

With α = 0.2736 and the hyperfine field Bo = 57(T) at 0 K, T_No is the magnetic order temperature of SrFeO₂F perovskite with x = 0.

The magnetic order temperature or Neel’s temperature depends on x (the Ba content); this dependence may be expressed as:

T(x) = T_N0 $b^{-ko{x}^2}$ due to expression (3), yields T(x) = T_N0 $b^{\frac{-{\left(a_x-a_{sr}\right)}^2}{ko}}$, or to the expression T_N(x) = T_N0 $b^{\frac{-{\left(a_x-a_{sr}\right)}^2}{\left(a_{Ba}-a_{sr}\right)}}$, where k_o = a_Ba − a_Sr

This expression may be transformed to T_N(x) = T_No $\sqrt{\frac{1-tanhyp{(ko. x^2.Logb)}^{ }}{1+Tanhyp\left(ko.x^{2 }.Logb\right)}}$, or converting the value of <ko. Log_e b = 0.13775> it yields: T_N (x) = T_No $\sqrt{\frac{1-tanhyp{(0.13775 x^2)}^{ }}{1+Tanhyp\left(0.13775x^2\right)}}$

The expression for the dependence magnetic hyperfine field from Temperature and concentration x takes the form:

$$\mathrm{B}(\mathrm{x},\mathrm{T})={\mathrm{B}}_0 {\left[1-\frac{T}{T_{N0}}{b}^{k{x}^2} \right]}^{1/b}$$

(9)

5. Conclusions

The Mössbauer spectra clearly indicate the presence of Fe³⁺ for the four oxides. As expected, the temperature of antiferromagnetic ordering decreases as x (the Ba/Sr contents) rises, since the super-exchange interactions between Fe³⁺ neighbors are weakened upon Ba²⁺ incorporation into the lattice as the unit-cell size increases. The magnetic moment obtained by Mössbauer data is lower than those obtained by the NPD. This discrepancy is due to the fact that the Mössbauer data give the magnetic moment of the nucleus and the NPD gives the magnetic moment of the entire atom. Mössbauer data showed that the magnetic hyperfine field decreased upon temperature increase, according to B(T) = B_o(1 − T/T_Nx)^1/b, where B₀ is the magnetic hyperfine field at 0 K and T_Nx is the magnetic order temperature for perovskite with contents x, 1/b = 0.2736—parameter.

The magnetic order temperature depends on x and temperature T. This dependence may be expressed as:

$$B(x,T)=B_0 {\left[1-\frac{T}{T_{N0}}{b}^{k{x}^2}\right]}^{1/b}$$