Next Article in Journal
A Case Study for an Assessment of Fire Station Selection in the Central Urban Area
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Human Casualties Due to Earthquakes: Overview and Application of Literature Models with Emphasis on Occupancy Rate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Explainable Boosting Machine: A Contemporary Glass-Box Model to Analyze Work Zone-Related Road Traffic Crashes

1
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha P.O. Box 1988, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif P.O. Box 11099, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering—Rabigh Branch, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah P.O. Box 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department Architecture, College of Engineering, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha P.O. Box 1988, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Unaizah P.O. Box 56452, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Safety 2023, 9(4), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040083
Submission received: 12 October 2023 / Revised: 14 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 28 November 2023

Abstract

Examining the factors contributing to work zone crashes and implementing measures to reduce their occurrence can significantly improve road safety. In this research, we utilized the explainable boosting machine (EBM), a modern glass-box machine learning (ML) model, to categorize and predict work zone-related crashes and to interpret the various contributing factors. The issue of data imbalance was also addressed by utilizing work zone crash data from the state of New Jersey, comprising data collected over the course of two years (2017 and 2018) and applying data augmentation strategies such synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), borderline-SMOTE, and SVM-SMOTE. The EBM model was trained using augmented data and Bayesian optimization for hyperparameter tuning. The performance of the EBM model was evaluated and compared to black-box ML models such as combined kernel and tree boosting (KTBoost, python 3.7.1 and KTboost package version 0.2.2), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM version 3.2.1), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost version 1.7.6). The EBM model, using borderline-SMOTE-treated data, demonstrated greater efficacy with respect to precision (81.37%), recall (82.53%), geometric mean (75.39%), and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.43). The EBM model also allows for an in-depth evaluation of single and pairwise factor interactions in predicting work zone-related crash severity. It examines both global and local perspectives, and assists in assessing the influence of various factors.
Keywords: traffic safety; work zones crashes; explainable boosting machine traffic safety; work zones crashes; explainable boosting machine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alahmadi, R.; Almujibah, H.; Alotaibi, S.; Elshekh, A.E.A.; Alsharif, M.; Bakri, M. Explainable Boosting Machine: A Contemporary Glass-Box Model to Analyze Work Zone-Related Road Traffic Crashes. Safety 2023, 9, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040083

AMA Style

Alahmadi R, Almujibah H, Alotaibi S, Elshekh AEA, Alsharif M, Bakri M. Explainable Boosting Machine: A Contemporary Glass-Box Model to Analyze Work Zone-Related Road Traffic Crashes. Safety. 2023; 9(4):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alahmadi, Raed, Hamad Almujibah, Saleh Alotaibi, Ali. E. A. Elshekh, Mohammad Alsharif, and Mudthir Bakri. 2023. "Explainable Boosting Machine: A Contemporary Glass-Box Model to Analyze Work Zone-Related Road Traffic Crashes" Safety 9, no. 4: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040083

APA Style

Alahmadi, R., Almujibah, H., Alotaibi, S., Elshekh, A. E. A., Alsharif, M., & Bakri, M. (2023). Explainable Boosting Machine: A Contemporary Glass-Box Model to Analyze Work Zone-Related Road Traffic Crashes. Safety, 9(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040083

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop