Next Article in Journal
Wahi Pana Aloha ʻĀina: Storied Places of Resistance as Political Intervention
Next Article in Special Issue
The Emergence and Development of the Coat of Arms of Macedonia in Illyrian Heraldry
Previous Article in Journal
Gender Inequalities and Sex-Differential Mortality in Pre-War Greece: A Regional Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heraldry in the Republic of Macedonia (1991–2019)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Symbols of the New Districts in Ukraine: Chervonohrad Raion as an Example

M.S. Hrushevsky Institute of Ukrainian Archeography and Source Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03142 Kyiv, Ukraine
Genealogy 2022, 6(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010006
Submission received: 5 December 2021 / Revised: 23 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 7 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heraldry in South Eastern Europe)

Abstract

:
The article examines the beginning of the creation of symbols for the new raions (districts). In 2020, Ukraine underwent an administrative reform to merge most of the existing 490 districts, resulting in the creation of 136 new raions. We have proposed three options for solving the problems with the coats of arms and flags of the new districts. The practical implementation of these methodological developments is considered in the example of the Chervonohrad raion (the Lviv region). The symbols of this district were developed and approved in the summer of 2021. They managed to combine the symbols of the ancient historical land, and the current administrative center, and the old districts.

1. Introduction

Since 1990, the Ukrainian Heraldry Society has actively conducted research in heraldry and vexillology. In a relatively short span of time, a great deal of work has been conducted in archives, a lot of heretofore unknown materials have been discovered, and Ukrainian and foreign heraldry (mainly that of neighboring countries) has been studied. On this basis, the main principles and rules of modern Ukrainian municipal heraldry and vexillology have been developed. Wide-ranging discussions on these issues were held at annual heraldic conferences and, as a result, the methodology and basic principles of modern heraldic art have been elaborated. The results of theoretical studies are being implemented gradually by providing free consultations to local authorities, expert evaluations, or preparing designs to order. Through the efforts of society members, it was possible to both renew old symbols and create new emblems and flags for more than 2000 cities, towns, villages, districts, and regions in Ukraine. Obviously, only a scholarly approach and the organization of existing symbols in accordance with heraldic norms in addition to new heraldic designs will enable the creation of a science firmly based on a system of municipal and territorial heraldry and vexillology. Unfortunately, there is still no state authority in Ukraine that would coordinate local symbols. The Ukrainian Heraldry Society coordinates work in these fields and regularly provides assistance to local authorities.

2. Administrative Reform

Ukraine is a unitary state. According to the Article 133 of Constitution of Ukraine, “the system of the administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine is composed of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, oblasts, raions, cities, districts in city, settlements, and villages”. Therefore, the top level of the administrative division in Ukraine is made up of oblasts (regions or provinces). Raions (districts) are the second level.
Rural raions did not have their own coats of arms in the Soviet Union. A new law on local self-government was adopted in Independent Ukraine in 1997. It gave the right not only to cities and towns to adopt and own their own symbols but also to oblasts, raions, and villages. Unfortunately, no separate law on local heraldry has been passed. From the end of the 1990s to 2020, 480 raions approved their symbols (Симвoліка 2001, 2004, 2005; Терлецький and Гречилo 2006; Кривенкo and Шляхoвий 2008; Кисляк 2020). Most of these projects were developed in collaboration with the Ukrainian Heraldry Society.
On 17 July 2020, the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament of Ukraine) approved the administrative reform to merge most of the existing 490 raions, resulting in the creation of 136 new raions1. New districts were formed by merging several old districts. Formally, this did not mean that it was necessary to develop new symbols for all new raions. However, it is necessary to approach each raion individually in every case.
In the past, we developed guidelines for creating a heraldic system of coats of arms of cities, towns, villages, rural districts, and regions (Гречилo 2001). In 2020, we proposed three possible solutions to the problems with the symbols of the new raions (Гречилo 2020a).
The first option is to preserve the old symbols of the district which has now been enlarged. This is possible if its old coats of arms and flags in content fully emphasize the identity and features of the new raion. This approach will also save money, as most of these symbols are already made and used in administrative buildings, interior decoration, offices, etc. For example, the old symbols of Sambir, Stryi, and Drohobych districts also characterize well the features of the new raions.
The second option is to create new symbols with a combination of coats of arms (or their individual elements) of the old districts. This will lead to the appearance of either complex coats of arms or composed of more details. A similar approach is provided for the development of the flags of new districts. This solution is good for those cases where there is some competition between the “old” raions, because in this case, they will all be reflected in the new symbols. An example is the new Zolochiv raion, formed of three old districts (Zolochiv, Brody, and Busk), each competed for the right to be the administrative center and wanted to emphasize their features.
The third option is to create completely new coats of arms and flags (possibly with the use of some successful charges from the old symbols). This approach is good when the coats of arms or flags of the old districts have failed, and it is difficult to use something for the new (as an example: Such common symbol as ears of wheat that can characterize any raion of Ukraine), and also for the districts which have received the name from the big cities which were not district centers before.

3. New Chervonohrad Raion

As an example of the third option, consider the Chervonohrad raion. This district is located in the northern part of the Lviv region, near the border with Poland. It included the territories of the former Sokal and Radekhiv raions, as well as the city of Chervonohrad and the territory of the Chervonohrad City Council (Figure 1).
Since the 12th century, the territory of the present Chervonohrad raion has been a part of Belz principality (Кoструба 1989; Кoзубoвський 2014). In the 15th–18th centuries it belonged to the Belz voivodeship. The symbol of this land was the griffin (Гречилo 2010, pp. 38, 47, 48). On the images of the 16th century, we can see a crowned silver griffin in a red shield (gules, a griffin rampant argent ducally crowned Or) (Ambrosius 1562; Kamyn 1575, p. 6; Recueil n.d., p. 9) (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The image of a griffin was one of the most beloved symbols of medieval applied art, which embodied the millennial artistic contacts of the East and the West. For example, the composition of a griffin as a central image is ideally inscribed in the Galician relief slabs in the 12th century (Білик 2017).
The city of Chervonohrad has been a significant coal mining industrial center since 1951 (Ясинецька 1992). A village named Novyi Dvir was mentioned at the site in 1525 (Wierzbowski 1912). In 1692, the Crown hetman and Cracow Voivode Feliks Kazimierz Potocki founded a city on the lands of the village and named it “Krystynopol” after his wife Krystyna Lubomirska. Krystynopol passed from Poland to the Ukrainian SSR after the territorial exchange in 1951 and had its name changed to Chervonohrad. Mining motifs were the main features on various unofficial emblems and souvenir badges during the Soviet period (Figure 5). This feature was indicated on the coat of arms of the city, approved in 19762 (Figure 6).
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the proclamation of Ukraine’s independence, active work began on the creation of municipal and territorial symbols. When the Chervonohrad city council asked Andriy Grechylo in 2002 to develop a new coat of arms of the city, he decided to keep the motif of the symbol from 1976, but change the colors and design (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The new coat of arms of Chervonohrad was approved by the city council on 27 September 20023. Red color indicates the name of the city (Ukrainian word “chervonyi” is translated as “red”), and black emphasizes the role of the coal industry in its development (Гречилo 2020b, p. 97). The stylized image of golden trolleys with coals and fern branches (which also mean rails) symbolizes wealth and prosperity.
The symbols of the Sokal raion (designed by Andriy Grechylo) were approved on 16 August 20024 (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The falcon indicates the name of the district (Ukrainian word “sokil” is translated as “falcon”), it is also a charge of the coat of arms of Sokal city, but in a different position. The crown symbolizes the ancient Duchy of Belz, as the center of which the city of Belz is located in the contemporary Sokal raion. The falcon on the crown testifies to the region’s ancient state traditions and should foster patriotic feelings and pride in its past. In the greater coat of arms, the shield is supported by two silver griffins, which were land symbols of the Belz voivodeship of the 15th–18th centuries. The red and black colors on the flag emphasize the traditions of the struggle of the inhabitants of the Sokal region for the freedom of Ukraine. Black also represents the coal industry, which employs many residents of the area.
The author of the symbols of the Radekhiv raion is also Andriy Grechylo. They were approved on 28 October 20035 (Figure 11 and Figure 12). The cross indicates the location of the district on the border with the Volyn region. Green means rich forest resources. Red symbolizes the Duchy of Belz. Golden sheaves emphasize the agrarian specialization of the district, and white diamonds mean sugar production. The lion belongs to the Lviv region, and the griffin belongs to the Belz land.
Andriy Grechylo was also approached in June 2021 to design the coat of arms and flag of the new Chervonohrad raion. The new projects managed to combine the symbols of the ancient Belz land, the city of Chervonohrad, and the two old districts (Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15). The coat of arms and the flag of the Chervonohrad district were approved on 20 August 20216.
The coat of arms of the Chervonohrad raion: Per bend sinister gules and sable, a griffin rampant argent langued and beaked Or. The shield ensigned with a district crown (a coronet composed of four oak leaves and four lime leaves) Or. Supporters: On either side, a lion Or, langued gules. Motto: Червoнoградський райoн (Chervonohrad Raion).
The flag of the Chervonohrad raion: A rectangular banner with a width to length ratio of 2:3, divided from the lower corner of the pole diagonally to the upper red and lower black triangular fields, in the center is situated a white griffin with a yellow beak and tongue.

4. Conclusions

The silver griffin is a historical symbol of the Duchy of Belz and the Belz voivodeship, whose territories included the lands of the contemporary Chervonohrad raion. The red color represents the name of the district. Black means fertile lands of Sokal and Radekhiv regions. The combination of red and black symbolizes the city of Chervonohrad and the coal industry, as well as emphasizes the traditions of the national liberation struggle in the region. Lions testify that the district belongs to the Lviv oblast.
The shield can be crowned with a stylized golden territorial crown, which indicates the coat of arms of the district and characterizes its vegetation (crown teeth are solved in the form of tree leaves)—such crowns are already approved in the coats of arms of a number of raion councils. Thus, the symbols of the district reflect the natural features, historical and modern symbols of the region and indicate its administrative status.
The process of organizing and creating symbols for new raions in Ukraine is now accelerating. Several other district councils have sought advice from the Ukrainian Heraldry Society. Let us hope this important project that is meant to capture the character, history, and spirit of the new raions and independent Ukraine will proceed with the appropriate academic rigor.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Notes

1
Пocтaнoвa Bepxoвнoї Paди Укpaїни вiд 17 липня 2020 poкy No. 807-IX «Пpo yтвopeння тa лiквiдaцiю paйoнiв». Decree of the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) of Ukraine No 807-IX (17 July 2020). Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/807-IX#Text (accessed on 4 December 2021).
2
Piшeння IX ceciї Чepвoнoгpaдcькoї мicькoї paди дeпyтaтiв тpyдящиx XV cкликaння вiд 26 жoвтня 1976. Decision of the Chervonohrad city council (26 October 1976).
3
Piшeння II ceciї Чepвoнoгpaдcькoї мicькoї paди IV дeмoкpaтичнoгo cкликaння вiд 27 вepecня 2002. No. 42 «Пpo зaтвepджeння гepбa тa пpaпopa мicтa Чepвoнoгpaдa». Decision of the Chervonohrad city council No. 42 (27 September 2002).
4
Piшeння III ceciї Coкaльcькoї paйoннoї paди IV cкликaння вiд 16 cepпня 2002. No. 32 «Пpo зaтвepджeння cимвoлiки Coкaльcькoгo paйoнy». Decision of the Sokal raion council No. 32 (16 August 2002).
5
Piшeння VII ceciї Paдexiвcькoї paйoннoї paди IV дeмoкpaтичнoгo cкликaння вiд 28 жoвтня 2003. No. 90 «Пpo зaтвepджeння cимвoлiки Paдexiвcькoгo paйoнy». Decision of the Radekhiv raion council No. 90 (28 October 2003).
6
Piшeння X ceciї Чepвoнoгpaдcькoї paйoннoї paди VIII cкликaння вiд 20 cepпня 2021. No. 113 «Пpo зaтвepджeння cимвoлiки Paдexiвcькoгo paйoнy Львiвcькoї oблacтi». Decision of the Chervonohrad raion council No. 133 (20 August 2021).

References

  1. Ambrosius, Marcus de Nissa. 1562. Arma Regni Poloniae (Coats of arms of the Kingdom of Poland). Antwerp: n.p. (In Latin) [Google Scholar]
  2. Білик, Олена (Bilyk, Olena). 2017. Образ грифoна в галицькoму середньoвічнoму мистецтві (The image of the Griffin in Galician medieval art). Мистецтвoзнавчі записки (Art History Notes) 32: 67–76. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  3. Симвoліка. 2001. Cимвoлiкa Бpoвapщини (Symbols of Brovary Raion). Брoвари (Brovary): ІПРЕЗ (IPREZ). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  4. Симвoліка. 2004. Cимвoлiкa Бiлoцepкiвщини (Symbols of Bila Tserkva Raion). Біла Церква (Bila Tserkva): Яніна (Yanina). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Cимвoлiкa. 2005. Cимвoлiкa Дpoгoбиччини (Symbols of Drohobych Raion). Дрoгoбич (Drohobych): Кoлo (Kolo). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Гречилo, Андрій (Grechylo, Andriy). 2001. Meтoдичнi peкoмeндaцiї з питaнь гepaльдики i пpaпopництвa oблacтeй, paйoнiв, paйoнiв y мicтax тa тepитopiaльниx гpoмaд мicт, ceлищ i ciл (тepитopiaльнi тa мyнiципaльнi cимвoли) (Methodical recommendations on heraldry and vexillology of oblasts, raions, raions in cities and territorial communities of cities, settlements and villages (territorial and municipal symbols)). Знак (The Sign) 23: 8–9. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  7. Гречилo, Андрій (Grechylo, Andriy). 2010. Укpaїнcькa тepитopiaльнa гepaльдикa (Ukrainian Territorial Heraldry). Львів (Lviv): Інститут українськoї археoграфії та джерелoзнавства ім. М.С. Грушевськoгo НАН України, Українське геральдичне тoвариствo (M.S. Hrushevsky Institute of Ukrainian Archeography and Source Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukrainian Heraldry Society). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Гречилo, Андрій (Grechylo, Andriy). 2020a. Адміністративнo-теритoріальна рефoрма і прoблеми муніципальнoгo та райoннoгo гербoтвoрення (Administrative-territorial reform and problems of municipal and district emblem formation). Знак (The Sign) 82: 5–6. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  9. Гречилo, Андрій (Grechylo, Andriy). 2020b. Гepби тa пpaпopи мicт i ciл Укpaїни (Coats-of-arms and Flags of Towns and Villages in Ukraine). Львів (Lviv): Інститут українськoї археoграфії та джерелoзнавства ім. М.С.Грушевськoгo НАН України, Українське геральдичне тoвариствo (M.S. Hrushevsky Institute of Ukrainian Archeography and Source Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukrainian Heraldry Society). Ч. 2 (Pt. 2). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamyn, Erasmus. 1575. Liber Insignorum Regionum Atque Clenodiorum (Regni Poloniae Summa cum Diligentia Elaboratus Book of Coats of Arms of the Lands and Symbols of the Kingdom of Poland). Poznań: n.p. Scientific Library of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. Ms 995 III. (In Latin) [Google Scholar]
  11. Кoструба, Теoфіл (Kostruba, Theophil). 1989. Бeлз i Бeлзькa зeмля вiд нaйдaвнiшиx чaciв дo 1772 poкy (Belz: The City and the Principality from Ancient Times to 1772). Нью-Йoрк and Тoрoнтo (New York and Toronto): Об’єднання надбужанців (The Buh River Region Association). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Кoзубoвський, Геoргій (Kozubovskyi, Heorhiy). 2014. Пpo Бeлзькe князiвcтвo Юpiя Hapимyнтoвичa (1352–1377) (Belz principality of Yurii Narymuntovych (1352–1377)). Археoлoгія (Archaeology) 3: 57–66. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  13. Кривенкo, Віталій (Kryvenko, Vitaliy), and Кoстянтин Шляхoвий (Kostiantyn Shliakhovyi). 2008. Cимвoлiкa Kipoвoгpaдщини (Symbols of the Kirovohrad Oblast). Кірoвoград (Kirovohrad): ПВЦ Мавік (PVC Mavik). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Кисляк, Вoлoдимир (Kysliak, Volodymyr), ed. 2020. Укpaїнa: Гepби тa пpaпopи (Ukraine: Arms and Flags). Київ (Kyiv): Парламентське видавництвo (Parliamentary Publishing House). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Recueil. n.d. Recueil d’armoiries polonaises (Collection of Polish Coats of Arms). n.p. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal (National Library of France, Library of the Arsenal). Ms-1114. (In Latin)
  16. Терлецький, Юрій (Terletskyi, Yuriy), and Андрій Гречилo (Andriy Grechylo). 2006. Cyчacнa cимвoлiкa Kocтoпiльщини (Contemporary Symbols of the Kostopil Raion). Рівне (Rivne): Українське геральдичне тoвариствo (Ukrainian Heraldry Society). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Wierzbowski, Teodor, ed. 1912. Matricularum Regni Poloniae summaria (Summary of the Polish Crown Metrica Books). Warsaw: Officinae C. Kowalewski, pt. 4. vol. 2, p. 316. (No. 14272). (In Latin) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ясинецька, Оксана (Yasynetska, Oksana). 1992. Hoвий Двip—Kpиcтинoпiль—Чepвoнoгpaд (Novyi Dvir–Krystynopil–Chevonohrad). Львів (Lviv): Край (Krai). (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Map of the Chervonohrad rayon in the Lviv oblast.
Figure 1. Map of the Chervonohrad rayon in the Lviv oblast.
Genealogy 06 00006 g001
Figure 2. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Arma Regni Poloniae, (Ambrosius 1562).
Figure 2. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Arma Regni Poloniae, (Ambrosius 1562).
Genealogy 06 00006 g002
Figure 3. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Liber insignorum Regionum atque clenodiorum Regni Poloniae summa cum diligentia elaboratus, (Kamyn 1575, p. 6).
Figure 3. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Liber insignorum Regionum atque clenodiorum Regni Poloniae summa cum diligentia elaboratus, (Kamyn 1575, p. 6).
Genealogy 06 00006 g003
Figure 4. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Recueil d’armoiries polonaises. Bibliothèque nationale de France. Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal. Ms-1114, (Recueil n.d., p. 9).
Figure 4. Coat of arms of the Belz land. From: Recueil d’armoiries polonaises. Bibliothèque nationale de France. Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal. Ms-1114, (Recueil n.d., p. 9).
Genealogy 06 00006 g004
Figure 5. Souvenir badge of Chervonohrad (1980s).
Figure 5. Souvenir badge of Chervonohrad (1980s).
Genealogy 06 00006 g005
Figure 6. Soviet coat of arms of Chervonohrad (1976).
Figure 6. Soviet coat of arms of Chervonohrad (1976).
Genealogy 06 00006 g006
Figure 7. Coat of arms of Chervonohrad (2002).
Figure 7. Coat of arms of Chervonohrad (2002).
Genealogy 06 00006 g007
Figure 8. Flag of Chervonohrad (2002).
Figure 8. Flag of Chervonohrad (2002).
Genealogy 06 00006 g008
Figure 9. Coat of arms of the Sokal raion (2002).
Figure 9. Coat of arms of the Sokal raion (2002).
Genealogy 06 00006 g009
Figure 10. Flag of the Sokal raion (2002).
Figure 10. Flag of the Sokal raion (2002).
Genealogy 06 00006 g010
Figure 11. Coat of arms of the Radekhiv raion (2003).
Figure 11. Coat of arms of the Radekhiv raion (2003).
Genealogy 06 00006 g011
Figure 12. Flag of the Radekhiv raion (2003).
Figure 12. Flag of the Radekhiv raion (2003).
Genealogy 06 00006 g012
Figure 13. Coat of arms of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Figure 13. Coat of arms of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Genealogy 06 00006 g013
Figure 14. Greater coat of arms of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Figure 14. Greater coat of arms of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Genealogy 06 00006 g014
Figure 15. Flag of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Figure 15. Flag of the Chervonohrad raion (2021).
Genealogy 06 00006 g015
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grechylo, A. Symbols of the New Districts in Ukraine: Chervonohrad Raion as an Example. Genealogy 2022, 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010006

AMA Style

Grechylo A. Symbols of the New Districts in Ukraine: Chervonohrad Raion as an Example. Genealogy. 2022; 6(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grechylo, Andriy. 2022. "Symbols of the New Districts in Ukraine: Chervonohrad Raion as an Example" Genealogy 6, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010006

APA Style

Grechylo, A. (2022). Symbols of the New Districts in Ukraine: Chervonohrad Raion as an Example. Genealogy, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop