Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Radiomics of Lung Nodules: A Multi-Institutional Study of Robustness and Agreement of Quantitative Imaging Features
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer

by
Lisa J. Wilmes
1,*,
Wen Li
1,
Hee Jung Shin
2,
David C. Newitt
1,
Evelyn Proctor
1,
Roy Harnish
1 and
Nola M. Hylton
1
1
Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
2
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Medical Imaging Laboratory, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2016, 2(4), 438-447; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00271
Submission received: 3 September 2016 / Revised: 5 October 2016 / Accepted: 10 November 2016 / Published: 1 December 2016

Abstract

In this study, the prognostic significance of tumor metrics derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was evaluated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. DTI and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were acquired at 1.5 T in 34 patients before treatment and after 3 cycles of taxane-based therapy (early treatment). Tumor fractional anisotropy (FA), principal eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were estimated for tumor regions of interest drawn on DTI data. The association between DTI metrics and final tumor volume change was evaluated with Spearman rank correlation. DTI metrics were investigated as predictors of pathological complete response (pCR) by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Early changes in tumor FA and ADC significantly correlated with final tumor volume change post therapy (ρ = −0.38, P = .03 and ρ = −0.71, P < .001, respectively). Pretreatment tumor ADC was significantly lower in the pCR than in the non-pCR group (P = .04). At early treatment, patients with pCR had significantly higher percent changes of tumor λ1, λ2, λ3, and ADC than those without pCR. The AUCs for early percent changes in tumor FA and ADC were 0.60 and 0.83, respectively. The early percent changes in tumor eigenvalues and ADC were the strongest DTI-derived predictors of pCR. Although early percent change in tumor FA had a weak association with pCR, the significant correlation with final tumor volume change suggests that this metric changes with therapy and may merit further evaluation.
Keywords: diffusion tensor imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; fractional anisotropy; neoadjuvant therapy; breast cancer diffusion tensor imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; fractional anisotropy; neoadjuvant therapy; breast cancer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wilmes, L.J.; Li, W.; Shin, H.J.; Newitt, D.C.; Proctor, E.; Harnish, R.; Hylton, N.M. Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer. Tomography 2016, 2, 438-447. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00271

AMA Style

Wilmes LJ, Li W, Shin HJ, Newitt DC, Proctor E, Harnish R, Hylton NM. Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer. Tomography. 2016; 2(4):438-447. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wilmes, Lisa J., Wen Li, Hee Jung Shin, David C. Newitt, Evelyn Proctor, Roy Harnish, and Nola M. Hylton. 2016. "Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer" Tomography 2, no. 4: 438-447. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00271

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop