Next Article in Journal
Geographic Variation in Opisthonema oglinum (Lesueur, 1818) in the Southeastern Brazilian Bight Inferred from Otolith Shape and Chemical Signatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Sex Determination and Male Differentiation in Southern Swordtail Fishes: Evaluation from an Evolutionary Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of the Coordination and Interaction among the Three Fishery Industries in China from the Value Chain Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Genome Uncovered Hidden Genetic Diversity in Microdous chalmersi (Teleostei: Odontobutidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Complete Mitogenome of Amazonian Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) as a Valuable Resource for Phylogenetic Analyses of Characidae

by
Luciano Fogaça de Assis Montag
1,†,
Ricardo Koroiva
1,2,*,†,
Ândrea Ribeiro-dos-Santos
3,
Leandro Magalhães
3,
Giovanna C. Cavalcante
3,
Caio S. Silva
3,
Sávio Guerreiro
3,
Daniel H. F. Gomes
4,
Jorge E. S. de Souza
4,
Sandro J. de Souza
4,
Lidia Brasil Seabra
1,
Maria Dayanne Lima de Lucena
1,
Erival Gonçalves Prata
1,
Izabella Cristina da Silva Penha
1,
Thaisa Sala Michelan
1,
Raphael Ligeiro
1 and
Leandro Juen
1
1
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil
2
Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa 58397-000, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil
4
Bioinformatics Multidisciplinary Environment (BioME), Instituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fishes 2023, 8(5), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8050233
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 26 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Evolution of Fishes)

Abstract

:
Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Ulrey, 1894), popularly known as ‘Flag Tetra’ in English speaking countries, belongs to the genus Hyphessobrycon of the family Characidae, and is widely present in the eastern Amazon basin. Here, using Illumina sequencing, we report the complete mitogenome sequence of H. heterorhabdus. Overall, the mitogenome has 17,021 bp, containing 13 protein-coding, 22 tRNA, and 2 rRNA genes. Non-ambiguous nucleotide compositions of the H. heterorhabdus mitogenome are A: 29.2%, T: 29.4%, G: 15.6%, and C: 25.8%. As recently indicated, the phylogenetic analyses did not support four separate genera (Hemigrammus, Hyphessobrycon, Moenkhausia, and Psalidodon) of Characidae. Understanding the H. heterorhabdus mitogenome is important for taxonomic purposes as well as for the molecular characterization of environmental pollutants. Thus, the mitogenome described here will be a valuable resource for studies on environmental changes, evolutionary genetics, species delimitation, and phylogenetic analyses in Characidae.
Key Contribution: In this study, the whole mitogenome sequence of H. heterorhabdus was completed. In addition, the phylogenetic relationship within the family Characidae was investigated.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Ulrey, 1894), commonly known as ‘Flag Tetra’ in English-speaking countries, is considered one of the most common fishes in the highland streams of the eastern Amazon (e.g., Ref. [1]) and occurs in Brazil in the coastal drainages from Pará to the Curuá-Una River basin and the lower Tapajós River [2]. It is a nektonic species with body morphology adapted to foraging in the water column and at the surface [3,4], an omnivore with a tendency to eat insects [5], and a popular freshwater ornamental fish [6].
The genus Hyphessobrycon includes about 160 species [2] and is polyphyletic. Although polyphyly has been demonstrated by molecular phylogenies and total evidence approaches [7,8,9,10], others have proposed a monophyletic species group within Hyphessobrycon using morphological taxonomy [11,12] and integrative taxonomy [2]. Thus, the phylogeny of this group is still controversial.
In addition, H. heterorhabdus is considered an important species for the assessment of environmental conditions in eastern Amazonian rivers, as it frequently occurs in areas with diverse quality conditions [5,13]. Toxins in the environment may have the potential to affect cellular functions, such as homeostasis promoted by mitochondria, a cytoplasmic organelle [14]. These organelles have their own genome, known as the mitochondrial genome or mitogenome. Therefore, characterizing the mitogenome of H. heterorhabdus is important not only for elucidating taxonomic discussions, but also to provide potential biological markers for environmental contaminants. The complete mitogenome described here will therefore be a valuable resource for research on environmental changes, evolutionary genetics, species delimitation, and phylogenetic analyses in Characidae.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

Samples were collected in the Capim–Guamá basin, state of Pará, Brazil (1°46′ S, 47°15′ W) (Figure 1). Total genomic DNA was extracted from the caudal fin of adults using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit extraction (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following supplier’s instructions. Quantification was performed using NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The voucher specimens were deposited in the Natural History Collection of the Museology Department (RTM) of the Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém, Brazil. Both the voucher specimens (code: MitoFish01male and MitoFish02female) and other specimens collected in the same stream were identified to species level by author LFAM from this study. The genome sequence data supporting the results of this study are freely available in NCBI’s GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession number OQ857750.

2.2. Assembly and Annotation of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome

Two genomic libraries (one from a male and one from a female) were constructed using Illumina DNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a short-insert size of 500 bp following manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were sequenced on Illumina NextSeq550 platform using a paired-end High Output Kit v2 (300 cycles).
Raw sequencing data were filtered in order to trim adapter and low-quality sequences, which yielded approximately 14 Gb. Genome assembly was carried out with MEGAHIT [15] and SOAPdenovo [16]. Locations of protein-coding genes (PCGs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs) were predicted using MiFish pipeline [17,18] and identified by alignment with other mitogenomes of Hyphessobrycon. tRNA predictions were confirmed using tRNAscan-SE [19], and R2DT [20] was used to predict and visualize secondary structures. Gene arrangement and structure were compared to seven mitogenomes from the Characidae family (including Hyphessobrycon species). Detection of mitochondrial heteroplasmy and nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (NUMTs) was performed using NOVOPlasty ver. 4.3.1 [21]. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy above a level of 2% was considered possibly real (see [22]).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the same genomes reported previously [9]. We created a concatenated set of base sequences from 35 species to examine the phylogenetic relationships of the Characidae (see Supplementary Table S1; [10,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]). Geneious® software (version 9.0.5) was used to generate the alignments [38] and Lebiasina astrigata (Regan, 1903) was used as an outgroup. The 13 PCGs of each species were aligned separately using the algorithm MAFFT v. 7.017 [39] with the strategy L- INS -I and the default parameters. A dataset containing all 3 codon positions of the 13 PCGs was prepared for phylogenetic analyses on the IQ-TREE web server [40] using an ultrafast bootstrap algorithm with 10,000 repetitions and automatic model selection (GTR + I + G).

3. Results

3.1. Mitochondrial Genome Structure

The complete circular mitogenome of H. heterorhabdus is 17,021 bp long containing 13 PCG, 22 tRNA, and 2 rRNA genes (Figure 2), with a non-ambiguous nucleotide composition as follows, A: 29.2%, T: 29.4%, G: 15.6%, C: 25.8%. The A + T content (58.5%) is higher than the C + G content (41.5%), showing that the mitogenome is biased toward AT. Among the genes, 28 are encoded in the H-strand (heavy strand), and the other 9 are encoded in the L-strand (light strand), as shown in Figure 2 and Table 1.
The H. heterorhabdus mitogenome is very similar to that of other species of Characidae, such as the four previously described mitochondrial mitogenomes [30] and Hyphessobrycon amandae (Géry and Uj, 1987) [24] (Figure 3).

3.2. Protein-Coding Genes

The overall length of the PCGs in the H. heterorhabdus mitogenome was 11,441 bp, ranging from 168 bp (ATP8) to 1839 bp (ND5). The average A + T content was 58.1%. Most PCGs used the conventional start codon ATG and ended with the codon TAN or an incomplete codon (T−−), except for the COX1 gene, which was terminated with AGG. The PCGs ND1-ND6, ND4L, COX1, COX2, COX3, ATP8, ATP6, and CYTB were observed in other teleost fishes and vertebrates (e.g., [41]).

3.3. Transfer and Ribosomal RNA Genes and Control Region

The mitogenome of H. heterorhabdus has 2 rRNAs and 22 typical tRNAs. The 16S rRNA and 12S rRNA were 954 and 1659 bp long, respectively, and the A + T contents of rRNA were 58.2%. Compared with other mitogenomes of characids, the tRNA genes of H. heterorhabdus are well conserved (see [42]). Among them, 14 tRNAs were encoded on the H-strand, and the remaining 8 were encoded on the L-strand. As shown in Figure 4, the 22 tRNAs have a typical cloverleaf secondary structure, with sizes ranging from 66 bp (tRNA-Cys) to 74 bp (tRNA-Leu); the total length of the 22 tRNAs was 1551 bp.
As shown in Figure 5, the relative usage of synonymous codons (RSCU) was biased for most amino acids. The two most commonly used codons were consistently AUU (15.0%) and CUU (13.6%). The comparative summaries of the RSCU of the mitogenomes for species of Hyphessobrycon show that they are very similar, as seen in Figure 5. In addition, synonymous codon preferences were conserved for all seven species, which can be attributed to their close relationship within the genus and family. Like other fish mitogenomes, the Control Region (D-loop) was located between the tRNA-Pro and tRNA-Phe.

3.4. Mitogenomic Heteroplasmy and NUMTs Analysis

In the analysis of heteroplasmy and NUMTs, we detected the presence of six heteroplasmic variants in male genomes and two heteroplasmic variants in female genomes (Table 2). Allele frequencies greater than 2%, a value that is usually valid for this detection, were found in the male D loop (locus 16951; C, AF = 0.576 and A, AF = 0.020) and in the female ND4 gene (locus 10803; A, AF = 0.0263). As for the NUMTs, only one possible degenerate sequence of the D-loop was assessed in the construction of the female genome.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

All species were well separated from the outgroup species, with good bootstrap values in ML. The H. heterorhabdus (Capim–Guamá basin) was more phylogenetically close to Hyphessobrycon amapaensis (Zarske and Géry, 1998), as seen in Figure 6.

4. Discussion

Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus is one of the most abundant fishes in upland streams of the eastern Amazon river and is considered an important species for assessing environmental conditions due to its ability to withstand variation in water quality [13]. Considering that mitochondria are cytoplasmic organelles with a crucial role in cellular homeostasis, and that toxic environmental contaminants may impact mitochondrial function and genetics [14], we sequenced the whole mitochondrial genome of H. heterorhabdus in order to fully characterize their mtDNA and provide a reference sequence for this species.
We observed that the circular mitogenome of H. heterorhabdus is 17,021 bp long and contains 13 PCG, 22 tRNA, and 2 rRNA genes (Figure 2). When comparing the distribution of genes found in this study to those previously reported in the literature, all 37 genes can be observed in other species of Characidae [30,42,43], demonstrating that these genes are conserved within this genus (Figure 3).
PCGs have shared similarities with teleosts, namely, the same start codon (ATG), with the exception of the ATP6 gene, which starts with TTG, a feature found in Hyphessobrycon megalopterus (Eigenmann, 1915), Hyphessobrycon amandae, and other teleosts [24,30,44,45]. Interestingly, eight PCGs have complete stop codons. TAA, the most frequent stop codon, is used by the genes ND1, ND2, ND4L, ND5, ND6, and CYTB, while other PCGs have the incomplete stop codon T-, seen in the ATP6, COX2, COX3, ND3, and ND4 genes (Table 1). These types of stop codons may be completed by a TAA with the addition of a poly-A tail during the RNA processing [46]. Such findings are frequent among teleosts, and have been discussed in other mitogenomes [24,47].
Regarding rRNAs and tRNAs, we observed that H. heterorhabdus have 2 rRNAs and 22 typical tRNAs. Compared to other Characidae mitogenomes, tRNA genes are well conserved [42] and cloverleaf secondary structures are common in many teleost mitogenomes [47,48]. Finally, regarding heteroplasmy and the presence of NUMTs in our mitogenomes, studies using this type of evaluation are still rare. Although our results show the presence of a few conspicuous allelic variations, it should be emphasized that these types of analyses are important for the confidence in genetic information in both evolutionary studies and molecular identification (see more in [49]).
There are approximately 160 species in the Hyphessobrycon genus, and the phylogeny of this group is not well established [2]. Since molecular taxonomy usually employs mitochondrial gene sequences to infer phylogenetic relationships [8], we used the sequence of 13 PCGs to improve the understanding of Characidae phylogeny. Our results did not support four genera (Hemigrammus, Hyphessobrycon, Moenkhausia, and Psalidodon) (Figure 6), corroborating the findings of the previous studies [10] and indicating that Hyphessobrycon is not a monophyletic group.
The polyphyly of the three clades of Hyphessobrycon species revealed by our mitochondrial genome analysis can be explained by several biogeographic factors. One possible explanation for why Hyphessobrycon is not a monophyletic group is vicariation events, during which a population is divided by a physical barrier, leading to isolation and the formation of two new isolates [50], or also by dispersal with high vagility, mainly by a temporary connection between basins [50]. The history of physical changes and connectivity between the basins that make up the Amazon basin is the most important factor in the diversity and speciation patterns observed for the fish basins found in this location [51].
We also note the phylogenetic proximity of H. heterorhabdus to H. amapaensis. The latter species is endemic to the state of Amapá, with a record distance of less than 500 km from the sequenced specimens. Previous morphological studies have indicated similarities among these species, such as a well-defined and elongated humeral spot and a spot on the caudal peduncle, aligning them to the same subgroup [2]. Regarding the mitogenome, tRNAs were very similar between species or showed only one or no nucleotide change, as in tRNA-Pro, tRNA-Lys, and t-RNA-Ser. Despite the possibility of analyzing the evolutionary divergence of these species based on molecular dating, it must be noted that the currently known distribution of both species is restricted to areas of repetitive marine influence during the Tertiary and Quaternary (see [52]), which must have led to changes in the evolution of species associated with this type of environment (e.g., [53]).

5. Conclusions

Here, we reported the first record of the complete mitogenome of H. heterorhabdus from the family Characidae. This mitochondrial genome has a length of 17,021 bp, including 13 PCGs, 2 rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs, with a close genomic structure to other mitogenomes of teleosts. Based on the molecular data from the H. heterorhabdus mitogenome, our phylogenetic analyses reinforce the recent proposal that Hemigrammus, Hyphessobrycon, Moenkhausia, and Psalidodon are not separate genera of Characidae.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fishes8050233/s1, Table S1: Mitogenomes used in phylogenetic analyses.

Author Contributions

L.F.d.A.M., Â.R.-d.-S., T.S.M., R.L. and L.J. designed the study. R.K., J.E.S.d.S., S.J.d.S. and D.H.F.G. performed formal analyses of the manuscript. L.F.d.A.M., R.K., Â.R.-d.-S., L.M., G.C.C., C.S.S., S.G., D.H.F.G., J.E.S.d.S., S.J.d.S., L.B.S., M.D.L.d.L., E.G.P., I.C.d.S.P., T.S.M., R.L. and L.J. wrote the original draft. All authors contributed to writing, reviewing, and editing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the research and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Biodiversity Research Consortium Brazil-Norway (BRC) and the Hydro Paragominas Company for their funding and logistical support for the project “Avaliando a integridade de ecossistemas aquáticos implementando um método de biomonitoramento baseado em sequenciamento de DNA de última geração”. This paper is number BRC0048 in the publication series of the BRC. LJ, LFAM, and RL thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for a research productivity fellowship (Grants #304710/2019-9, 302406/2019-0, and 312531/2021-4 respectively). This study was partially funded by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) - Financial Code 001; We are grateful for funding from authors' grants EGP 88887.615449/2021-00, ICSP 88887.625421/2021-00 and, LBS 88887.615440/2021-00. We also thank the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação (PROPESP) from the Federal University of Pará (UFPA) (Edital 02/2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Fieldwork was authorized by the Biodiversity Information and Authorization System (SISBIO) of the Brazilian government (License Number 4681-1) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal do Pará (CEUA no. 8293020418).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data supporting the results of this study are freely available in NCBI’s GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession number OQ857750.

Acknowledgments

We thank Fernanda Alves Martins for assistance in writing the project "Avaliando a integridade de ecossistemas aquáticos implementando um método de biomonitoramento baseado em sequenciamento de DNA de última geração" that funded this work. We also thank AEP Oliveira for the collection carried out, R. Souza for the preparation of the map and Flávio T. Lima for supporting the work.

Conflicts of Interest

S.J.S. declares that there is a conflict of interest with the Chief Scientific Officer of DNA GTx Bioinformatics, LTDA, and a shareholder of DNA GTx, Inc., Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The remaining authors declare no commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Montag, L.F.A.; Leão, H.; Benone, N.L.; Monteiro-Júnior, C.S.; Faria, A.P.J.; Nicacio, G.; Ferreira, C.P.; Garcia, D.H.A.; Santos, C.R.M.; Pompeu, P.S.; et al. Contrasting Associations between Habitat Conditions and Stream Aquatic Biodiversity in a Forest Reserve and Its Surrounding Area in the Eastern Amazon. Hydrobiologia 2019, 826, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Faria, T.C.; Guimarães, K.L.A.; Rodrigues, L.R.R.; Oliveira, C.; Lima, F.C.T. A New Hyphessobrycon (Characiformes: Characidae) of the Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus Species-Group from the Lower Amazon Basin, Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2021, 19, e200102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gibran, F.Z. Habitat Partitioning, Habits and Convergence among Coastal Nektonic Fish Species from the São Sebastião Channel, Southeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2010, 8, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brejao, G.L.; Gerhard, P.; Zuanon, J. Functional Trophic Composition of the Ichthyofauna of Forest Streams in Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2013, 11, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Benone, N.L.; Lobato, C.M.C.; Soares, B.E.; de Assis Montag, L.F. Spatial and Temporal Variation of the Diet of the Flag Tetra Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) in Streams of the Eastern Amazon. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2020, 18, e200078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Novák, J.; Kalous, L.; Patoka, J. Modern Ornamental Aquaculture in Europe: Early History of Freshwater Fish Imports. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2042–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oliveira, C.; Avelino, G.S.; Abe, K.T.; Mariguela, T.C.; Benine, R.C.; Ortí, G.; Vari, R.P.; Corrêa e Castro, R.M. Phylogenetic Relationships within the Speciose Family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) Based on Multilocus Analysis and Extensive Ingroup Sampling. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mirande, J.M. Morphology, Molecules and the Phylogeny of Characidae (Teleostei, Characiformes). Cladistics 2019, 35, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ohara, W.M.; Teixeira, T.F.; Albornoz-Garzón, J.G.; Mirande, J.M.; Lima, F.C.T. Hyphessobrycon rheophilus, a New Species from Rapids of the Amazon and Orinoco River Basins (Characiformes: Characidae: Stethaprioninae). Zootaxa 2019, 4712, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, R.; Jiang, H.; Ding, J.; Wu, H.; Wu, Y.; Liu, H. Comparative Mitochondrial Genomics of Tetras: Insights into Phylogenetic Relationships in Characidae. Biologia 2022, 77, 2905–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lima, F.; Coutinho, D.; Wosiacki, W. A New Hyphessobrycon (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) from the Middle Amazon Basin, Brazil. Zootaxa 2014, 3872, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Moreira, C.; Lima, F. Two New Hyphessobrycon (Characiformes: Characidae) Species from Central Amazon Basin, Brazil. Zootaxa 2017, 4318, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Montag, L.F.A.; Winemiller, K.O.; Keppeler, F.W.; Leão, H.; Benone, N.L.; Torres, N.R.; Prudente, B.S.; Begot, T.O.; Bower, L.M.; Saenz, D.E.; et al. Land Cover, Riparian Zones and Instream Habitat Influence Stream Fish Assemblages in the Eastern Amazon. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2019, 28, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meyer, J.N.; Leung, M.C.K.; Rooney, J.P.; Sendoel, A.; Hengartner, M.O.; Kisby, G.E.; Bess, A.S. Mitochondria as a Target of Environmental Toxicants. Toxicol. Sci. 2013, 134, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, D.; Luo, R.; Liu, C.-M.; Leung, C.-M.; Ting, H.-F.; Sadakane, K.; Yamashita, H.; Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT v1.0: A Fast and Scalable Metagenome Assembler Driven by Advanced Methodologies and Community Practices. Methods 2016, 102, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, R.; Liu, B.; Xie, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, W.; Yuan, J.; He, G.; Chen, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. SOAPdenovo2: An Empirically Improved Memory-Efficient Short-Read de Novo Assembler. Gigascience 2012, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sato, Y.; Miya, M.; Fukunaga, T.; Sado, T.; Iwasaki, W. MitoFish and MiFish Pipeline: A Mitochondrial Genome Database of Fish with an Analysis Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1553–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Iwasaki, W.; Fukunaga, T.; Isagozawa, R.; Yamada, K.; Maeda, Y.; Satoh, T.P.; Sado, T.; Mabuchi, K.; Takeshima, H.; Miya, M.; et al. MitoFish and MitoAnnotator: A Mitochondrial Genome Database of Fish with an Accurate and Automatic Annotation Pipeline. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2531–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. TRNAscan-SE: A Program for Improved Detection of Transfer RNA Genes in Genomic Sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sweeney, B.A.; Hoksza, D.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Ribas, C.E.; Madeira, F.; Cannone, J.J.; Gutell, R.; Maddala, A.; Meade, C.D.; Williams, L.D.; et al. R2DT Is a Framework for Predicting and Visualising RNA Secondary Structure Using Templates. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dierckxsens, N.; Mardulyn, P.; Smits, G. Unraveling Heteroplasmy Patterns with NOVOPlasty. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2020, 2, lqz011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parakatselaki, M.-E.; Ladoukakis, E.D. MtDNA Heteroplasmy: Origin, Detection, Significance, and Evolutionary Consequences. Life 2021, 11, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tang, C.; Wei, L.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, G. First Determination and Analysis of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of X-Ray Tetra Pristella maxillaris (Ulrey, 1894) (Actinopteri, Characidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2022, 7, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, C.-H.; Liu, H.-Y.; Xu, N.; Zhang, X.-L.; Zhang, Q.; Han, B.-P. Mitochondrial Genome Structures and Phylogenetic Analyses of Two Tropical Characidae Fishes. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 627402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, R.; Zhao, Z.-X.; Xu, P.; Sun, X.-W. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Silvertip Tetra, Hasemania nana (Characiformes: Characidae). Mitochondrial DNA 2015, 26, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Meng, F.; Huang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, J.; Jing, F.; Xia, L.; Liu, Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Lebiasina astrigata (Characiformes: Lebiasinida) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characiformes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 579–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, J.; Jing, F.; Xia, L.; Liu, Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Gephyrocharax atracaudatus (Characiformes, Characidae) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characiformes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1901–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, W.; Lin, S.; Liu, H. Mitochondrial Genomes of Five Hyphessobrycon Tetras and Their Phylogenetic Implications. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 12754–12764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, W.; Ding, J.; Lin, S.; Xu, R.; Liu, H. Comparative Mitogenomes of Three Species in Moenkhausia: Rare Irregular Gene Rearrangement within Characidae. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.; Sun, C.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, Y.; Ruan, H. Mitochondrial Genomes of Four American Characins and Phylogenetic Relationships within the Family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes). Gene 2020, 762, 145041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Q.; Miao, Z.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Meng, F.; Zhu, K.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Hemigrammus bleheri (Characiformes: Hemigrammus) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characiformes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3834–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, Y.; Meng, F.; Liu, B.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, T. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Paracheirodon axelrodi (Characiformes: Characidae) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characiformes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3824–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, A.; Liu, F.; Jiang, H.; Feng, C.; Tang, D. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Paracheirodon innesi. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2017, 28, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pasa, R.; Menegídio, F.B.; Rodrigues-Oliveira, I.H.; da Silva, I.B.; de Campos, M.L.C.B.; Rocha-Reis, D.A.; Heslop-Harrison, J.S.; Schwarzacher, T.; Kavalco, K.F. Ten Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Gymnocharacini (Stethaprioninae, Characiformes). Insights Into Evolutionary Relationships and a Repetitive Element in the Control Region (D-Loop). Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 650783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Isaza, J.P.; Alzate, J.F.; Maldonado-Ocampo, J.A. Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequence of Grundulus Bogotensis (Humboldt, 1821). Mitochondrial DNA 2014, 27, 2076–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, K.; Cao, P.; Yin, X.; Chen, J.; Yuan, P.; Miao, Z.; Ping, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, B.; Gao, Y. Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrodi (Characiformes, Characidae) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characiformes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 3622–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Q.; Zhang, T.; Yin, X.; Meng, F.; Huang, Y.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Nematobrycon palmeri (Characiformes:Nematobrycon) and Phylogenetic Studies of Characidaes. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 3474–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.-T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A Fast Online Phylogenetic Tool for Maximum Likelihood Analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Anderson, S.; Bankier, A.T.; Barrell, B.G.; de Bruijn, M.H.L.; Coulson, A.R.; Drouin, J.; Eperon, I.C.; Nierlich, D.P.; Roe, B.A.; Sanger, F.; et al. Sequence and Organization of the Human Mitochondrial Genome. Nature 1981, 290, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sun, C.-H.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Zeng, X.-S.; Liu, D.-W.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, X.-L.; Zhang, Q. Mitogenome of Knodus borki (Cypriniformes: Characidae): Genomic Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 1741–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhu, Q.; Luo, S.; Pan, S.; Su, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, J. Complete Mitogenome of Gymnocorymbus ternetzi (Characiformes: Characidae: Gymnocorymbus) and Phylogenetic Implications. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2022, 7, 58–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moreira, D.A.; Buckup, P.A.; Britto, M.R.; Magalhães, M.G.P.; de Andrade, P.C.C.; Furtado, C.; Parente, T.E. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Corydoras nattereri (Callichthyidae: Corydoradinae). Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2016, 14, e150167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, R.; Zhang, D.; Deng, S.; Ding, D.; Liao, F.; Liu, L. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Acanthosentis cheni (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 797–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ojala, D.; Montoya, J.; Attardi, G. TRNA Punctuation Model of RNA Processing in Human Mitochondria. Nature 1981, 290, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shi, W.; Gong, L.; Wang, S.-Y.; Miao, X.-G.; Kong, X.-Y. Tandem Duplication and Random Loss for Mitogenome Rearrangement in Symphurus (Teleost: Pleuronectiformes). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Satoh, T.P.; Miya, M.; Mabuchi, K.; Nishida, M. Structure and Variation of the Mitochondrial Genome of Fishes. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, K.; Xie, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X. Extensive Mitogenomic Heteroplasmy and Its Implications in the Phylogeny of the Fish Genus Megalobrama. 3 Biotech 2023, 13, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dagosta, F.C.P.; de Pinna, M. Biogeography of Amazonian Fishes: Deconstructing River Basins as Biogeographic Units. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2017, 15, e170034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dagosta, F.C.P.; De Pinna, M. The Fishes of the Amazon: Distribution and Biogeographical Patterns, with a Comprehensive List of Species. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2019, 2019, 1–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Irion, G.; Müller, J.; Morais, J.O.; Keim, G.; de Mello, J.N.; Junk, W.J. The Impact of Quaternary Sea Level Changes on the Evolution of the Amazonian Lowland. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23, 3168–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aleixo, A. Historical Diversification of Floodplain Forest Specialist Species in the Amazon: A Case Study with Two Species of the Avian Genus Xiphorhynchus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 89, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Samples were collected in the Capim–Guamá basin (Site 1), state of Pará, Brazil. Photo by G. Palheta.
Figure 1. Samples were collected in the Capim–Guamá basin (Site 1), state of Pará, Brazil. Photo by G. Palheta.
Fishes 08 00233 g001
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the circular mitogenome map of H. heterorhabdus (Capim–Guamá basin). Different colors indicate groups of genes: 13 protein-coding genes (in green), 22 tRNAs (in pink), 2 rRNAs (in red), and control region (D-loop; in yellow). The blue ring represents the GC content.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the circular mitogenome map of H. heterorhabdus (Capim–Guamá basin). Different colors indicate groups of genes: 13 protein-coding genes (in green), 22 tRNAs (in pink), 2 rRNAs (in red), and control region (D-loop; in yellow). The blue ring represents the GC content.
Fishes 08 00233 g002
Figure 3. Arrangement of genes encoding RNAs and proteins in four species from the Hyphessobrycon genus and three outgroups (Lebiasina astrigata, Hyphessobrycon amapensis, Hy. heterorhabdus, Hemigrammus armstrongi, Hy. herbetaxelrodi, Nematobycon palmeri, and Hy. elachys).
Figure 3. Arrangement of genes encoding RNAs and proteins in four species from the Hyphessobrycon genus and three outgroups (Lebiasina astrigata, Hyphessobrycon amapensis, Hy. heterorhabdus, Hemigrammus armstrongi, Hy. herbetaxelrodi, Nematobycon palmeri, and Hy. elachys).
Fishes 08 00233 g003
Figure 4. Predicted secondary structures of 22 inferred tRNAs from the H. heterorhabdus mitochondrial genome.
Figure 4. Predicted secondary structures of 22 inferred tRNAs from the H. heterorhabdus mitochondrial genome.
Fishes 08 00233 g004
Figure 5. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of protein-coding genes of four species from the Hyphessobrycon genus and three outgroups (Lebiasina astrigata, Hyphessobrycon amapensis, Hy. heterorhabdus, Hemigrammus armstrongi, Hy. herbetaxelrodi, Nematobycon palmeri and Hy. elachys).
Figure 5. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of protein-coding genes of four species from the Hyphessobrycon genus and three outgroups (Lebiasina astrigata, Hyphessobrycon amapensis, Hy. heterorhabdus, Hemigrammus armstrongi, Hy. herbetaxelrodi, Nematobycon palmeri and Hy. elachys).
Fishes 08 00233 g005
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of 35 species of Characidae based on 13 PCGs. Values shown next to nodes are maximum-likelihood ultrafast bootstrap values.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of 35 species of Characidae based on 13 PCGs. Values shown next to nodes are maximum-likelihood ultrafast bootstrap values.
Fishes 08 00233 g006
Table 1. Mitochondrial genome organization and gene content of H. heterorhabdus (Capim–Guamá basin) with a detailed description of gene boundaries, gene length (in bp), as well as start and stop codons for protein-coding genes and anticodons for tRNA genes.
Table 1. Mitochondrial genome organization and gene content of H. heterorhabdus (Capim–Guamá basin) with a detailed description of gene boundaries, gene length (in bp), as well as start and stop codons for protein-coding genes and anticodons for tRNA genes.
NameTypeStrandStartStopLengthAnticodon and Start Codon/Stop CodonIntergenic Nucleotides
tRNA-PhetRNAH16969GAA0
12S rRNArRNAH701023954-0
tRNA-ValtRNAH1024109572TAC0
16S rRNArRNAH109627541659-0
tRNA-LeutRNAH2755282874TAA0
ND1GeneH28293797969ATG/TAA7
tRNA-IletRNAH3805387672GAT12
tRNA-GlntRNAL3889395971TTG4
tRNA-MettRNAH3964403269CAT1
ND2GeneH403451011068ATG/TAA12
tRNA-TrptRNAH5114518370TCA7
tRNA-AlatRNAL5191525969TGC1
tRNA-AsntRNAL5261533373GTT31
tRNA-CystRNAL5365543066GCA−1
tRNA-TyrtRNAL5430550071GTA1
COX1GeneH550270611560ATG/AGG−13
tRNA-SertRNAL7049712072TGA5
tRNA-AsptRNAH7126719368GTC16
COX2GeneH72107900691ATG/T-0
tRNA-LystRNAH7901797373TTT1
ATP8GeneH79758142168ATG/TAG−10
ATP6GeneH81338814682TTG/T-0
COX3GeneH88159598784ATG/T-0
tRNA-GlytRNAH9599967072TCC0
ND3GeneH967110,019349ATG/T-0
tRNA-ArgtRNAH10,02010,08869TCG0
ND4LGeneH10,08910,385297ATG/TAA−7
ND4GeneH10,37911,7591381ATG/T-0
tRNA-HistRNAH11,76011,82869GTG0
tRNA-SertRNAH11,82911,89668GCT1
tRNA-LeutRNAH11,89811,97073TAG0
ND5GeneH11,97113,8091839ATG/TAA−4
ND6GeneL13,80614,321516ATG/TAA0
tRNA-GlutRNAL14,32214,38968TTC5
CYTBGeneH14,39515,5311137ATG/TAA4
tRNA-ThrtRNAH15,53615,60873TGT−2
tRNA-ProtRNAL15,60715,67670TGG0
D-loop H15,67717,0201344-1
Table 2. Divergent alleles associated with male and female mitogenomes of Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Ulrey, 1894). REF Alelle: reference allele; ALT allele: alternative allele; AF: allele frequency; DP: depth of coverage at this site for this sample.
Table 2. Divergent alleles associated with male and female mitogenomes of Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Ulrey, 1894). REF Alelle: reference allele; ALT allele: alternative allele; AF: allele frequency; DP: depth of coverage at this site for this sample.
SampleLocusREF AlleleALT AlleleAFDPGene Region
Male2691CA0.014513716S rRNA
Female10,803GA0.026375ND4
Male13,940TA0.012281ND6
Male14,076CCC0.0124322ND6
Female14,192TG0.0162123ND6
Male14,397GA0.0161123CYTB
Male14,691TG0.012877CYTB
Male16,951TC,A0.576, 0.020597D-Loop
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montag, L.F.d.A.; Koroiva, R.; Ribeiro-dos-Santos, Â.; Magalhães, L.; Cavalcante, G.C.; Silva, C.S.; Guerreiro, S.; Gomes, D.H.F.; Souza, J.E.S.d.; Souza, S.J.d.; et al. The Complete Mitogenome of Amazonian Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) as a Valuable Resource for Phylogenetic Analyses of Characidae. Fishes 2023, 8, 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8050233

AMA Style

Montag LFdA, Koroiva R, Ribeiro-dos-Santos Â, Magalhães L, Cavalcante GC, Silva CS, Guerreiro S, Gomes DHF, Souza JESd, Souza SJd, et al. The Complete Mitogenome of Amazonian Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) as a Valuable Resource for Phylogenetic Analyses of Characidae. Fishes. 2023; 8(5):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8050233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis, Ricardo Koroiva, Ândrea Ribeiro-dos-Santos, Leandro Magalhães, Giovanna C. Cavalcante, Caio S. Silva, Sávio Guerreiro, Daniel H. F. Gomes, Jorge E. S. de Souza, Sandro J. de Souza, and et al. 2023. "The Complete Mitogenome of Amazonian Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) as a Valuable Resource for Phylogenetic Analyses of Characidae" Fishes 8, no. 5: 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8050233

APA Style

Montag, L. F. d. A., Koroiva, R., Ribeiro-dos-Santos, Â., Magalhães, L., Cavalcante, G. C., Silva, C. S., Guerreiro, S., Gomes, D. H. F., Souza, J. E. S. d., Souza, S. J. d., Seabra, L. B., Lucena, M. D. L. d., Prata, E. G., Penha, I. C. d. S., Michelan, T. S., Ligeiro, R., & Juen, L. (2023). The Complete Mitogenome of Amazonian Hyphessobrycon heterorhabdus (Characiformes: Characidae) as a Valuable Resource for Phylogenetic Analyses of Characidae. Fishes, 8(5), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8050233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop