Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Probing Electron Properties in ECR Plasmas Using X-ray Bremsstrahlung and Fluorescence Emission
Previous Article in Journal
Connecting Complex Electronic Pattern Formation to Critical Exponents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy and Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy of X-ray Irradiated LiF Crystals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials

by
Gaetano Campi
1,* and
Antonio Bianconi
1,2,3
1
Institute of Crystallography, CNR, Via Salaria Km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy
2
RICMASS Rome International Center for Materials Science, Superstripes Via dei Sabelli 119A, 00185 Roma, Italy
3
Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Condens. Matter 2021, 6(4), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat6040040
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 November 2021 / Published: 5 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High Precision X-ray Measurements 2021)

Abstract

:
Nanoscale phase separation (NPS), characterized by particular types of correlated disorders, plays an important role in the functionality of high-temperature superconductors (HTS). Our results show that multiscale heterogeneity is an essential ingredient of quantum functionality in complex materials. Here, the interactions developing between different structural units cause dynamical spatiotemporal conformations with correlated disorder; thus, visualizing conformational landscapes is fundamental for understanding the physical properties of complex matter and requires advanced methodologies based on high-precision X-ray measurements. We discuss the connections between the dynamical correlated disorder at nanoscale and the functionality in oxygen-doped perovskite superconducting materials.

1. Introduction

Nanoscale phase separation (NPS) has been considered to be detrimental for high-temperature superconductivity. However, high-precision X-ray measurements in solid-state physics [1,2,3,4,5] have recently provided experimental validation for the alternative paradigm, where lattice heterogeneity from the atomic limit to the micron scale plays a key role [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. NPS shows that intertwined and interlocked nanoscale lattice structures form heterostructures at the atomic limit [13]. This induces the emergence of novel functionalities, such as high-temperature superconductivity, in complex quantum materials as organics [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], doped perovskites [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], iron-based superconductors [40,41,42,43,44], charge–density–wave materials [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52], manganites showing colossal magnetoresistance [53,54,55,56,57], doped diborides [58,59,60], smart structures and biological systems [61,62,63,64,65,66], perovskite oxide interfaces [67,68,69], and magnetic materials [70,71].
Today, at the beginning of the twenties of the XXI century, the development of advanced experimental X-ray methods has provided evidence that quantum functionalities (e.g., colossal magnetoresistance and high-temperature superconductivity) are controlled by the correlated lattice disorder from atomic scales to micron scales. This multiscale lattice heterogeneity has been quite difficult to unveil by conventional experimental approaches, requiring high spatial resolution probes. Nowadays, advanced, latest generation synchrotron sources and new X-ray optics have allowed the design of new scanning techniques, based on focused X-ray beams.
In this way, several crystallographic structures, coexisting on micron scales and nanoscales, have been visualized in high-temperature superconductors (HTS). Strain and doping drive these systems at critical points for phase separation, with the coexistence of different crystallographic phases existing in different nanoregions of the crystal. While in the literature on HTS, the focus of theoretical research has been addressed to electronic phase separation and inhomogeneity—due to competition or intertwining between superconductivity and magnetism—the main result of scanning X-ray diffraction has been to provide compelling experimental evidence that, at nanoscale, different puddles show a substantial lattice structural difference, which necessarily implies electronic and magnetic phase separation. In fact, looking at the nanoscale, we have observed different nanoregions with different lattice structures, showing different electronic and magnetic ordered phases, with different topologies that influence the Fermi surfaces, the pseudogap energy, and even the superconducting critical temperature. We would like to underline archetypal cases of intrinsic phase separation in AxFe2−ySe2, which are originated by the coexistence of an insulating magnetic phase and a paramagnetic metallic phase with an in-plane compressed and expanded lattice [40,41,42,43,44]. A second clear case of phase separation has been found in YBa2Cu3O6+y, with y < 0.5, where superconductivity (y > 0.33) percolates in a network of oxygen-ordered nanoregions (y = 0.5), interspersed with oxygen-depleted domains (y = 0) [37].
Here, we have chosen to discuss the relationship between phase separation at nanoscale and the emerging macroscopic properties in two high-temperature superconducting quantum materials, such as La2CuO4.1 [38] and HgBa2CuO4.12 [7], doped by mobile oxygen interstitial ions (O-i).

2. Results

2.1. Correlated Disorder and Phase Separation in La2CuO4+y

La2CuO4+y is one of the simplest compounds, where y oxygen interstitial ions (O-i) in the rocksalt [La2O2+y] are intercalated by [CuO2] layers. Thanks to the high synchrotron photon flux, we have measured the satellite peaks, which are associated with super-cells, due to oxygen interstitial O-i dopants and charge–density waves (CDW) arrangement (see Figure 1a). CDWs incommensurate diffuse satellites with wave vector qCDW = 0.21b* + 0.29c*, coexist with O-i satellites displaced by qO-i = 0.25b* + 0.5c*. Oxygen ions, O-i. and CDW superstructures are characterized by a different staging, that is, their c* component; indeed, O-i and CDW have staging c* = 0.5 and c* = 0.29, respectively, as indicated by the white arrows in Figure 1a.
A common and intriguing feature of quantum materials is that their emerging properties can be easily manipulated by weak external stimuli, such as temperature gradient, strain, and photon illumination. Due to the mobility of oxygen interstitials (O-i), our systems present structural conformational landscapes. The conformations have been manipulated by continuous X-ray photo illumination, as shown in Figure 1b, where we bring the sample from a structural conformation with disordered O-i to a different conformation with ordered O-i, after illumination. Different conformations, characterized by different order degrees of O-i [72,73], can be obtained by combining X-ray flux intensity with thermal cycling, as shown in Figure 1c. Here the (full symbols) X-ray low flux and (empty symbols) high flux on the sample, correspond to 0.5 × 1014 photons s−1 cm−2 and 5.0 × 1014 photons s−1 cm−2, respectively. The temperature change rate has been 1 K min−1 in both low-flux and high-flux illumination. Each point on the two hysteresis corresponds with a specific structural conformation, with a specific degree of order (or disorder) of O-i.
The different O-i ordered domains are inhomogeneously distributed in space, as seen by SμXRD. The maps in Figure 2a,b show two different O-i distributions, obtained with two different thermal treatments; the first one (a) shows the maximum critical temperature (Tc = 40 K) and the second (b) presents a macroscopic phase separation with two critical temperatures, Tc = 16 K and 32 K [6].
We have characterized this inhomogeneity by using spatial statistics tools, described in [6]. In both samples, the probability density function of O-i satellite intensity follows an exponentially truncated power–law distribution, given by P(x) = x−αexp(−x/x0), where α is the critical exponent and x0 is the cut-off. The critical exponent, α, results to be 2.6, both in the high-Tc (a) and low-Tc (b) conformations, indicating the fractal nature of O-i arrangement. On the other hand, the cut-off, x0, is larger for the high-Tc = 40 K sample, as can be seen in Figure 2c. This means that a larger extent of O-i satellite intensity with fractal geometry favors a higher Tc [38].
We have found that the spatial inhomogeneity is characterized by a strong spatial anticorrelation between the O-i-rich and CDW-rich regions. In the oxygen-rich regions, the system is in the over-doped metallic phase, while in the oxygen-poor region in the underdoped phase, we measure a high density of CDW. Figure 3a shows the map of difference between the intensity of O-i and CDW diffraction satellites. The O-i are located in the 1/4,1/4,1/4 site, and form commensurate stripes in the La2O2 structure, intertwined with incommensurate lattice CDW domains [39]. Indeed, we observed micron size puddles of blue metallic oxygen-rich regions, separated by red CDW-rich zones, by a filamentary percolating interface, indicated by white space in Figure 3b.

2.2. Correlated Disorder and Phase Separation in HgBa2CuO4+y

Structural and electronic inhomogeneity has been studied in the high-temperature perovskite superconductor, with tetragonal crystal symmetry HgBa2CuO4+y with a single CuO2 plane. In this compound, the oxygen interstitial ions (O-i) form atomic stripes in the spacer layer [HgOyBa2O2] between [CuO2] planes. We have measured the diffuse scattering associated with both CDW and oxygen interstitial arrangement in the lattice. Diffuse CDW satellites have been detected at qCDW = 0.23a* + 0.16c* and qCDW = 0.23b* + 0.16c* (where a*, b*, and c* are the lattice units in the reciprocal space) around the (108) Bragg peak, below the onset temperature TCDW = 240 K [7]. Resolution-limited streaks connecting the Bragg peaks, due to atomic O-i stripes in the HgOy spacer layers, have been measured in agreement with previous experiments [6,32].
In Figure 4a,b we show the maps of the integrated intensity of CDW peak and oxygen O-i diffuse streaks, respectively [7,9], as seen by SμXRD measurements. Both O-i and CDW maps are spatially inhomogeneous, and their PDF is well modeled by a power–law behavior also in this case, as shown in Figure 4c. The critical exponents in the two intensity distributions are 1.8 ± 0.1 and 2.2 ± 0.1 for the O-i and CDW, respectively [7].
A map of the spatial organization of the in-plane CDW-puddle size, ξa, is shown in Figure 4d. Although the average size of CDW puddles is 4.3 nm (in agreement with previous works), its probability density function, shown in Figure 4e, has a fat-tail, fitted by a power–law curve with critical exponent of 2.8 ± 0.1. This means that rare and larger puddles up to 40 nm are measured, and their distribution provides a complex topology for the flowing of superconductivity currents [7,9].
As in the La2CuO4+y superconductor, the spatial inhomogeneity shows a negative correlation between O-i and CDW. This is well depicted in the ‘difference map’ between CDW peaks and O-i-diffuse streaks in Figure 5a. The poor CDW regions on the CuO2 basal plane correspond to O-i-rich regions on the HgOy layers. The O-i atomic striped domains are here intertwined with incommensurate lattice CDW. The percolating filamentary interface between O-i-rich and O-i-poor regions is indicated by white space in Figure 5b.

3. Discussion

The anomalous phase diagram of HTS cuprates is believed, nowadays, to be closely related to the phase separation at multiple scale length. This feature is particularly pronounced in those compounds doped by mobile oxygen interstitials. In this context, the present work reports evidence of nanoscale phase separation in the cases of two different oxygen-doped layered perovskites, La2CuO4+y and HgBa2CuO4+y. At optimum doping level, specific charge ordering and segregation lead to the formation of metallic and insulating domains with oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor regions, respectively. These different zones have been measured as different superlattices in X-ray diffraction and their inhomogeneous spatial distribution has been visualized by scanning micro X-ray diffraction. The results provide relevant evidence for the universality of phase separation, where dopants’ O-i-rich domains are intertwined with CDW domains, even in the most optimized superconducting cuprates.
We have shown that the coexisting phases can be easily manipulated (e.g., by X-ray illumination) on controlled small areas, drawing a way to extend the functionality of the investigated materials in the direction of information storage [74,75].

4. Materials and Methods

The La2CuO4+y (LCO) single crystal with y = 0.1 has orthorhombic Fmmm space group symmetry, with lattice parameters a = (5.386 ± 0.004) Å, b = (5.345 ± 0.008) Å, and c = (13.205 ± 0.031) Å at room temperature. The HgBa2CuO4+y (Hg1201) single crystal, with y = 0.12, has a sharp superconducting transition at Tc = 95 K. The crystal structure has tetragonal P4/mmm space group symmetry with lattice parameters a = b = 0.387480(5) nm and c = 0.95078(2) nm at T = 100 K. Diffraction measurements on both single crystals of LCO and Hg1201 were performed on the ID13 beamline at ESRF, as described in [38] and [7], respectively. Data analysis has been performed by using customized and homemade written MATLAB routines [6].

Author Contributions

G.C. and A.B. conceived the experiments and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be requested to the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Luisa Barba and XRD1 beamline staff at ELETTRA, Trieste, Italy; Manfred Burghammer and ID13 beamline staff at ESRF; Alessandro Ricci, Nicola Poccia, Michela Fratini, and Stefano Agrestini for the long-standing collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schunck, J.O.; Döring, F.; Rösner, B.; Buck, J.; Engel, R.Y.; Miedema, P.S.; Mahatha, S.K.; Hoesch, M.; Petraru, A.; Kohlstedt, H.; et al. Soft X-ray imaging spectroscopy with micrometer resolution. Optica 2021, 8, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schülli, T.U.; Leake, S.J. X-ray nanobeam diffraction imaging of materials. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 22, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campi, G. Structural Fluctuations at Nanoscale in Complex Functional Materials. In Synchrotron Radiation Science and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  4. Poccia, N.; Chorro, M.; Ricci, A.; Xu, W.; Marcelli, A.; Campi, G.; Bianconi, A. Percolative superconductivity in La2CuO4.06 by lattice granularity patterns with scanning micro X-ray absorption near edge structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 221903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Campi, G.; Ricci, A.; Poccia, N.; Fratini, M.; Bianconi, A. X-rays Writing/Reading of charge density waves in the CuO2 plane of a simple cuprate superconductor. Condens. Matter. 2017, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Campi, G.; Bianconi, A. Evolution of complexity in out-of-equilibrium systems by time-resolved or space-resolved synchrotron radiation techniques. Condens. Matter. 2019, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Campi, G.; Bianconi, A.; Poccia, N.; Bianconi, G.; Barba, L.; Arrighetti, G.; Innocenti, D.; Karpinski, J.; Zhigadlo, N.D.; Kazakov, S.M.; et al. Inhomogeneity of charge-density-wave order and quenched disorder in a high-Tc superconductor. Nature 2015, 525, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dagotto, E. Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems. Science 2005, 309, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Campi, G.; Bianconi, A. High-Temperature Superconductivity in a Hyperbolic Geometry of Complex Matter from Nanoscale to Mesoscopic Scale. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2016, 29, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carlson, E.W. Condensed-matter physics: Charge topology in superconductors. Nature 2015, 525, 329–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bishop, A.R. HTC oxides: A collusion of spin, charge and lattice. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2008, 108, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Littlewood, P. Superconductivity: An X-ray oxygen regulator. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 726–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Amabilino, D.B.; Stoddart, J.F. Interlocked and intertwined structures and superstructures. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2725–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Živković, J.M.; Stanković, I.M.; Ninković, D.B.; Zarić, S.D. Decisive Influence of Environment on Aromatic/Aromatic Interaction Geometries. Comparison of Aromatic/Aromatic Interactions in Crystal Structures of Small Molecules and in Protein Structures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 1898–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mazziotti, M.V.; Valletta, A.; Campi, G.; Innocenti, D.; Perali, A.; Bianconi, A. Possible Fano resonance for high-Tc multi-gap superconductivity in p-Terphenyl doped by K at the Lifshitz transition. EPL Europhys. Lett. 2017, 118, 3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mazziotti, M.V.; Jarlborg, T.; Bianconi, A.; Valletta, A. Room temperature superconductivity dome at a Fano resonance in superlattices of wires. EPL Europhys. Lett. 2021, 134, 17001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mazziotti, M.V.; Raimondi, R.; Valletta, A.; Campi, G.; Bianconi, A. Resonant multigap superconductivity at room temperature near a Lifshitz topological transition in sulfur hydrides. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2106.14394. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bianconi, A.; Jarlborg, T. Lifshitz transitions and zero point lattice fluctuations in sulfur hydride showing near room temperature superconductivity. Nov. Supercond. Mater. 2015, 1, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cui, Y.; Li, B.; He, H.; Zhou, W.; Chen, B.; Qian, G. Metalorganic frameworks as platforms for functional materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kochev, V.D.; Kesharpu, K.K.; Grigoriev, P.D. Anisotropic zero-resistance onset in organic superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 014519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bianconi, A.; Missori, M. High Tc superconductivity by quantum confinement. J. Phys. I 1994, 4, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bianconi, A. On the possibility of new high Tc superconductors by producing metal heterostructures as in the cuprate perovskites. Solid State Commun. 1994, 89, 933–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bianconi, A.; Missori, M.; Oyanagi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Ha, D.H.; Nishiara, Y.; Della Longa, S. The measurement of the polaron size in the metallic phase of cuprate superconductors. EPL Europhys. Lett. 1995, 31, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Della Longa, S.; Soldatov, A.; Pompa, M.; Bianconi, A. Atomic and electronic structure probed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy: Full multiple scattering analysis with the G4XANES package. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1995, 4, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saini, N.L.; Lanzara, A.; Missori, M.; Rossetti, T.; Bianconi, A.; Oyanagi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Oka, K.; Ito, T. Local lattice instability of CuO2 plane in La1.85 Sr0.15 CuO4 by polarized Cu K edge absorption. Phys. C Supercond. 1995, 251, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bianconi, A.; Saini, N.L.; Rossetti, T.; Lanzara, A.; Perali, A.; Missori, M.; Oyanagi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Nishihara, Y.; Ha, D.H. Stripe structure in the CuO2 plane of perovskite superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 12018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bianconi, A.; Saini, N.L.; Lanzara, A.; Missori, M.; Rossetti, T.; Oyanagi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Oka, K.; Ito, T. Determination of the Local Lattice Distortions in the CuO2 Plane of La1.85Sr0.15CuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76, 3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Saini, N.L.; Oyanagi, H.; Ito, T.; Scagnoli, V.; Filippi, M.; Agrestini, S.; Campi, G.; Oka, K.; Bianconi, A. Temperature dependent local Cu-O displacements from underdoped to overdoped La-Sr-Cu-O superconductor. Eur. Phys. J. B Condens. Matter. Complex Syst. 2003, 36, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bianconi, A. Shape resonances in superstripes. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 536–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krockenberger, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Yamamoto, H. Atomic Stripe Formation in Infinite-Layer Cuprates. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21884–21891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hsu, C.C.; Huang, B.C.; Schnedler, M.; Lai, M.Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Dunin-Borkowski, R.E.; Chang, C.S.; Lee, T.K.; Ebert, P.; Chiu, Y.P. Atomically-resolved interlayer charge ordering and its interplay with superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.81. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Izquierdo, M.; Freitas, D.C.; Colson, D.; Garbarino, G.; Forget, A.; Raffy, H.; Itié, J.P.; Ravy, S.; Fertey, P.; Núñez-Regueiro, M. Charge Order and Suppression of Superconductivity in HgBa2CuO4+d at High Pressures. Condens. Matter. 2021, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ohgoe, T.; Hirayama, M.; Misawa, T.; Ido, K.; Yamaji, Y.; Imada, M. Ab initio study of superconductivity and inhomogeneity in a Hg-based cuprate superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 045124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bianconi, A. Shape resonances in multi-condensate granular superconductors formed by networks of nanoscale-striped puddles. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 449, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jarlborg, T.; Bianconi, A. Fermi surface reconstruction of superoxygenated La2CuO4 superconductors with ordered oxygen interstitials. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 054514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ricci, A.; Poccia, N.; Campi, G.; Coneri, F.; Barba, L.; Arrighetti, G.; Polentarutti, M.; Burghammer, M.; Sprung, M.; v Zimmermann, M.; et al. Networks of superconducting nano-puddles in 1/8 doped YBa2Cu3O6.5+y controlled by thermal manipulation. N. J. Phys. 2014, 16, 053030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Campi, G.; Ricci, A.; Poccia, N.; Barba, L.; Arrighetti, G.; Burghammer, M.; Caporale, A.S.; Bianconi, A. Scanning micro-X-ray diffraction unveils the distribution of oxygen chain nanoscale puddles in YBa2Cu3O6.33. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 014517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fratini, M.; Poccia, N.; Ricci, A.; Campi, G.; Burghammer, M.; Aeppli, G.; Bianconi, A. Scale-free structural organization of oxygen interstitials in La2CuO4+y. Nature 2010, 466, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Poccia, N.; Ricci, A.; Campi, G.; Fratini, M.; Puri, A.; Di Gioacchino, D.; Marcelli, A.; Reynolds, M.; Burghammer, M.; Saini, N.L.; et al. Optimum inhomogeneity of local lattice distortions in La2CuO4+y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 15685–15690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ricci, A.; Poccia, N.; Joseph, B.; Innocenti, D.; Campi, G.; Zozulya, A.; Westermeier, F.; Schavkan, A.; Coneri, F.; Bianconi, A.; et al. Direct observation of nanoscale interface phase in the superconducting chalcogenide KxFe2-ySe2 with intrinsic phase separation. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 020503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ricci, A.; Joseph, B.; Poccia, N.; Campi, G.; Saini, N.L.; Bianconi, A. Temperature Dependence of √2 x √2 Phase in Superconducting K0.8Fe1.6Se2 Single Crystal. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2014, 27, 1003–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Weyeneth, S.; Bendele, M.; Von Rohr, F.; Dluzewski, P.; Puzniak, R.; Krzton-Maziopa, A.; Bosma, S.; Guguchia, Z.; Khasanov, R.; Shermadini, Z.; et al. Superconductivity and magnetism in RbxFe2−ySe2: Impact of thermal treatment on mesoscopic phase separation. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 134530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Krzton-Maziopa, A.; Svitlyk, V.; Pomjakushina, E.; Puzniak, R.; Conder, K. Superconductivity in alkali metal intercalated iron selenides. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2016, 28, 293002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hazi, J.; Mousavi, T.; Dudin, P.; van der Laan, G.; Maccherozzi, F.; Krzton-Maziopa, A.; Pomjakushina, E.; Conder, K.; Speller, S.C. Magnetic imaging of antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases in RbxFe2−ySe2 crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 054509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gebreyohannes, M.G.; Singh, P. Possible coexistence of charge density wave and superconductivity and enhancement of the transition temperature for the layered quasi-two-dimensional superconductor 2H-NbSe2. J. Phys. Commun. 2021, 5, 105010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kinyanjui, M.K.; Ebad-Allah, J.; Krottenmüller, M.; Kuntscher, C.A. Atomic-scale mapping of pressure-induced deformations and phase defects in the charge density wave order parameter. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 125106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, J.; Nagao, M.; Mizuguchi, Y.; Ruff, J. Direct observation of an incommensurate charge density wave in the BiS2-based superconductor NdO1−xFxBiS2. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 245120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grandadam, M.; Pépin, C. Pole structure of the electronic self-energy with coexistence of charge order and superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 224507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, H.Y.; Singh, A.; Mou, C.Y.; Johnston, S.; Kemper, A.F.; Brink, J.; Chen, P.J.; Lee, T.K.; Okamoto, J.; Chu, Y.Y.; et al. Quantum fluctuations of charge order induce phonon softening in a superconducting cuprate. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2108.11425. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao, H.; Porter, Z.; Chen, X.; Wilson, S.D.; Wang, Z.; Zeljkovic, I. Imaging antiferromagnetic domain fluctuations and the effect of atomic-scale disorder in a doped spin-orbit Mott insulator. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.12648. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mukhin, S.I. Euclidean Q-balls of fluctuating SDW/CDW in the ‘nested’ Hubbard model of high-Tc superconductors as the origin of pseudogap and superconducting behavior. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2108.10372. [Google Scholar]
  52. Banerjee, S.; Atkinson, W.A.; Kampf, A.P. Emergent charge order from correlated electron-phonon physics in cuprates. Commun. Phys. 2020, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Uehara, M.; Mori, S.; Chen, C.H.; Cheong, S.W. Percolative phase separation underlies colossal magnetoresistance in mixed-valent manganites. Nature 1999, 399, 560–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tokura, Y. Critical features of colossal magnetoresistive manganites. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2006, 69, 797–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dagotto, E. Nanoscale Phase Separation and Colossal Magnetoresistance: The Physics of Manganites and Related Compounds; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  56. Saxena, A.; Aeppli, G. Phase transitions at the nanoscale in functional materials. MRS Bull. 2009, 34, 804–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bryant, B.; Renner, C.; Tokunaga, Y.; Tokura, Y.; Aeppli, G. Imaging oxygen defects and their motion at a manganite surface. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Campi, G.; Cappelluti, E.; Proffen, T.; Qiu, X.; Bozin, E.S.; Billinge, S.J.L.; Agrestini, S.; Saini, N.L.; Bianconi, A. Study of temperature dependent atomic correlations in MgB2. Eur. Phys. J. B 2006, 52, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Agrestini, S.; Metallo, C.; Filippi, M.; Simonelli, L.; Campi, G.; Sanipoli, C.; Liarokapis, E.; De Negri, S.; Giovannini, M.; Saccone, A.; et al. Substitution of Sc for Mg in MgB2: Effects on transition temperature and Kohn anomaly. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 134514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bauer, E.; Paul, C.; Berger, S.; Majumdar, S.; Michor, H.; Giovannini, M.; Saccone, A.; Bianconi, A. Thermal conductivity of superconducting MgB2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2001, 13, L487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wadhawan, V.K. Smart Structures: Blurring the Distinction Between the Living and the Nonliving; Monographs on the Physics and Chemistry of Materials 65; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  62. Campi, G.; Fratini, M.; Bukreeva, I.; Ciasca, G.; Burghammer, M.; Brun, F.; Tromba, G.; Mastrogiacomo, M.; Cedola, A. Imaging collagen packing dynamics during mineralization of engineered bone tissue. Acta Biomater. 2015, 23, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bukreeva, I.; Campi, G.; Fratini, M.; Spanò, R.; Bucci, D.; Battaglia, G.; Giove, F.; Bravin, A.; Uccelli, A.; Venturi, C.; et al. Quantitative 3D investigation of Neuronal network in mouse spinal cord model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ciasca, G.; Campi, G.; Battisti, A.; Rea, G.; Rodio, M.; Papi, M.; Pernot, P.; Tenenbaum, A.; Bianconi, A. Continuous thermal collapse of the intrinsically disordered protein tau is driven by its entropic flexible domain. Langmuir 2012, 28, 13405–13410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ciasca, G.; Papi, M.; Chiarpotto, M.; Rodio, M.; Campi, G.; Rossi, C.; De Sole, P.; Bianconi, A. Transient state kinetic investigation of ferritin iron release. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 073703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Campi, G.; Cristofaro, F.; Pani, G.; Fratini, M.; Pascucci, B.; Corsetto, P.A.; Weinhausen, B.; Cedola, A.; Rizzo, A.M.; Visai, L.; et al. Heterogeneous and self-organizing mineralization of bone matrix promoted by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 17274–17283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mannhart, J.; Schlom, D.G. Oxide interfaces an opportunity for electronics. Science 2010, 327, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hwang, H.Y.; Iwasa, Y.; Kawasaki, M.; Keimer, B.; Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bert, J.A.; Kalisky, B.; Bell, C.; Kim, M.; Hikita, Y.; Hwang, H.Y.; Moler, K.A. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Drees, Y.; Li, Z.W.; Ricci, A.; Rotter, M.; Schmidt, W.; Lamago, D.; Sobolev, O.; Rutt, U.; Gutowski, O.; Sprung, M.; et al. Hour-glass magnetic excitations induced by nanoscopic phase separation in cobalt oxides. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Campi, G.; Poccia, N.; Joseph, B.; Bianconi, A.; Mishra, S.; Lee, J.; Roy, S.; Nugroho, A.A.; Buchholz, M.; Braden, M.; et al. Direct visualization of spatial inhomogeneity of spin stripes order in La1.72Sr0.28NiO4. Condens. Matter. 2019, 4, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Poccia, N.; Bianconi, A.; Campi, G.; Fratini, M.; Ricci, A. Size evolution of the oxygen interstitial nanowires in La2CuO4+y by thermal treatments and X-ray continuous illumination. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2012, 25, 124004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Poccia, N.; Fratini, M.; Ricci, A.; Campi, G.; Barba, L.; Vittorini-Orgeas, A.; Bianconi, G.; Aeppli, G.; Bianconi, A. Evolution and control of oxygen order in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 733–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sidorenko, A.S. Fractal geometry in superconductivity. Mold. J. Phys. Sci. 2002, 1, 102–105. [Google Scholar]
  75. Gabovich, A.M.; Moiseev, D.P.; Panaitov, G.I.; Sidorenko, A.S.; Postinov, V.M. Relaxation of the magnetization in superconducting oxides. Mod. Phys. Lett. B. 1989, 3, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD image of b*c* plane in the reciprocal lattice of the La2CuO4.1 sample. We observed several superstructures surrounding the indicated Bragg peaks (004, 006, 008), due to O-i ordering and charge–density waves (CDW). The arrows indicate the O-i and CDW superlattices. (b) At T = 330 K, the O-i get disordered in the sample and the diffraction satellite vanishes (upper panel). X-ray photon illumination (O-i) allows a speeding up in the ordering kinetic (lower panel). (c) The oxygen ordering rate depends on the X-ray flux, as shown in the thermal cycle measured by using two different X-ray photon fluxes [72]. Red and blue symbols refer to heating and cooling cycles, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) XRD image of b*c* plane in the reciprocal lattice of the La2CuO4.1 sample. We observed several superstructures surrounding the indicated Bragg peaks (004, 006, 008), due to O-i ordering and charge–density waves (CDW). The arrows indicate the O-i and CDW superlattices. (b) At T = 330 K, the O-i get disordered in the sample and the diffraction satellite vanishes (upper panel). X-ray photon illumination (O-i) allows a speeding up in the ordering kinetic (lower panel). (c) The oxygen ordering rate depends on the X-ray flux, as shown in the thermal cycle measured by using two different X-ray photon fluxes [72]. Red and blue symbols refer to heating and cooling cycles, respectively.
Condensedmatter 06 00040 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the O-i superstructure intensity for two different conformations in La2Cu04.1 samples, with (a) Tc = 40 K (b) and Tc = 16 and 32 K phases in a 500 × 400 µm2 area. The bar corresponds to 50 µm. (c) The rescaled probability distribution, xαP(x), of the O-i superstructure intensity for the two samples. The cut-off, x0, increases from 8 ± 1 in the low-Tc conformation to 31 ± 2 in the high-Tc conformation. The rescaled distributions collapse on the same universal curve (black solid line) [38].
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the O-i superstructure intensity for two different conformations in La2Cu04.1 samples, with (a) Tc = 40 K (b) and Tc = 16 and 32 K phases in a 500 × 400 µm2 area. The bar corresponds to 50 µm. (c) The rescaled probability distribution, xαP(x), of the O-i superstructure intensity for the two samples. The cut-off, x0, increases from 8 ± 1 in the low-Tc conformation to 31 ± 2 in the high-Tc conformation. The rescaled distributions collapse on the same universal curve (black solid line) [38].
Condensedmatter 06 00040 g002
Figure 3. (a) Surface plot of the map difference between the normalized intensities of both CDW and O-i satellites in La2Cu04.1 [38]. CDW puddles are dominant in red regions, while the O-i stripes are dominant in the blue zones. The lattice modulations corresponding to CDWs and O-i superstructures are depicted. (b) 2D map difference highlighting the interface (white region) between CDW-rich and O-i-rich regions. The white bars correspond to 5 µm.
Figure 3. (a) Surface plot of the map difference between the normalized intensities of both CDW and O-i satellites in La2Cu04.1 [38]. CDW puddles are dominant in red regions, while the O-i stripes are dominant in the blue zones. The lattice modulations corresponding to CDWs and O-i superstructures are depicted. (b) 2D map difference highlighting the interface (white region) between CDW-rich and O-i-rich regions. The white bars correspond to 5 µm.
Condensedmatter 06 00040 g003
Figure 4. Colour plot of the map of the (a) O-i streak intensity and (b) charge–density waves (CDW) peak in HgBa2CuO4.12. (c) Probability density function, calculated from the O-i streaks and CDW intensity map in (a,b), showing a power–law behaviour. (d) Colour map of the CDW coherence length ξa of the CDW. (e) Probability density distribution of ξa.
Figure 4. Colour plot of the map of the (a) O-i streak intensity and (b) charge–density waves (CDW) peak in HgBa2CuO4.12. (c) Probability density function, calculated from the O-i streaks and CDW intensity map in (a,b), showing a power–law behaviour. (d) Colour map of the CDW coherence length ξa of the CDW. (e) Probability density distribution of ξa.
Condensedmatter 06 00040 g004
Figure 5. (a) Surface plot of the map difference between the normalized intensities of both CDW satellite and O-i streaks in HgBa2CuO4.12 [7]. CDW puddles are dominant in red regions and the O-i stripes are dominant in the blue zones. The bar corresponds to 5 µm. (b) Pictorial view of the spatial anticorrelation between CDW puddles in the CuO2 plane and the O-i-rich domains in the HgOy layers. Here, the interface space between CDW and O-i has been highlighted by the white region. The bar corresponds to 5 µm.
Figure 5. (a) Surface plot of the map difference between the normalized intensities of both CDW satellite and O-i streaks in HgBa2CuO4.12 [7]. CDW puddles are dominant in red regions and the O-i stripes are dominant in the blue zones. The bar corresponds to 5 µm. (b) Pictorial view of the spatial anticorrelation between CDW puddles in the CuO2 plane and the O-i-rich domains in the HgOy layers. Here, the interface space between CDW and O-i has been highlighted by the white region. The bar corresponds to 5 µm.
Condensedmatter 06 00040 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campi, G.; Bianconi, A. Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials. Condens. Matter 2021, 6, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat6040040

AMA Style

Campi G, Bianconi A. Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials. Condensed Matter. 2021; 6(4):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat6040040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campi, Gaetano, and Antonio Bianconi. 2021. "Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials" Condensed Matter 6, no. 4: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat6040040

APA Style

Campi, G., & Bianconi, A. (2021). Functional Nanoscale Phase Separation and Intertwined Order in Quantum Complex Materials. Condensed Matter, 6(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat6040040

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop