Next Article in Journal
Beyond the Finish Line: Examining the Role of Children in Marathon Races—A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Disentangling Gender and Relative Age Effects in Women’s and Girls’ Rugby Union
Previous Article in Journal
An Able-Bodied Study for Potential Usage of a Knee Scooter as a Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) Gait Training Device
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of COVID-19 on Key Performance Indicators of Spanish Professional Soccer League
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In-Season Test–Retest Reliability of Visual Smooth-Pursuit (EyeGuide Focus) Baseline Assessment in Female and Male Field-Sport Athletes

1
Department of Sports, Exercise, and Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University, H91 T8NW Galway City, Ireland
2
School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2024, 9(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010046
Submission received: 30 January 2024 / Revised: 22 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 4 March 2024

Abstract

Sport-related concussions (SRCs) are a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) that induces transient symptoms in athletes. These symptoms provide avenues for developing emerging technologies to diagnose SRCs, in particular ocular and vestibular dysfunction. The following study aims to assess the reliability of visual smooth-pursuit technology (EyeGuide Focus) in amateur field-sport athletes. A convenience sample of 30 mixed-gender athletes (mean age = 24.89 ± 6.81 years) completed two testing sessions separated by 2–7 days. Participants were tested at rest, free from distraction, and completed a 10 s smooth pursuit while seated. Participants completed 2–4 practice trials before completing three tests at each session. Appropriate difference, reliability, and repeatability tests were performed in Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. No significant difference existed between the time points (p > 0.05). The reliability between sessions was poor (ICC = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.03–0.42), and the mean coefficients of variation were 20% and 21% for each session, indicating poor repeatability. However, the implementation of practice trials did prevent the familiarization effects that are evident in the previous literature (p > 0.05). The within-session reliability of EyeGuide Focus has varied from poor (ICC ≤ 0.50) to good (ICC = 0.75–0.90) in the previous literature, indicating the fact that greater research is required before this tool can be implemented in applied settings.
Keywords: eye tracking; sport-related concussion; saccades; ocular; athletes; mTBI eye tracking; sport-related concussion; saccades; ocular; athletes; mTBI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Walshe, A.; Daly, E.; Pearce, A.J.; Ryan, L. In-Season Test–Retest Reliability of Visual Smooth-Pursuit (EyeGuide Focus) Baseline Assessment in Female and Male Field-Sport Athletes. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2024, 9, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010046

AMA Style

Walshe A, Daly E, Pearce AJ, Ryan L. In-Season Test–Retest Reliability of Visual Smooth-Pursuit (EyeGuide Focus) Baseline Assessment in Female and Male Field-Sport Athletes. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2024; 9(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Walshe, Ayrton, Ed Daly, Alan J. Pearce, and Lisa Ryan. 2024. "In-Season Test–Retest Reliability of Visual Smooth-Pursuit (EyeGuide Focus) Baseline Assessment in Female and Male Field-Sport Athletes" Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 9, no. 1: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010046

APA Style

Walshe, A., Daly, E., Pearce, A. J., & Ryan, L. (2024). In-Season Test–Retest Reliability of Visual Smooth-Pursuit (EyeGuide Focus) Baseline Assessment in Female and Male Field-Sport Athletes. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010046

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop