Next Article in Journal
Energy Estimation for Electret Harvester with Nonlinear Spring
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Morphology in Intentional Agency and Social Interaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Direct Catalyst Conversion Sensor in Form of a Single Self-Heated Mixed-Potential Device †

Department of Functional Materials, Bayreuth Engine Research Center, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2017 Conference, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017.
Proceedings 2017, 1(4), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040424
Published: 7 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Proceedings of Eurosensors 2017, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017)

Abstract

:
Monitoring automotive exhaust gas aftertreatment components is required by law as part of the on-board diagnostics (OBD). For this purpose, a novel sensor device that determines directly the catalyst conversion could be used. It consists of a single, self-heated yttria stabilized ZrO2-based disc, separating two gas atmospheres. Two identical mixed-potential electrodes yield a voltage signal by comparing a certain trace gas concentration up- and downstream of the catalyst. Measurements in synthetic gas flow verify the theoretical assumption that this voltage signal only depends on the ratio of both concentrations, respectively on the conversion of the catalyst.

1. Introduction

To meet present and future limitations of harmful emissions, exhaust gas aftertreatment systems have to be installed in automotive exhaust lines and monitored by on-board diagnostics (OBD) [1,2,3]. As a possible method to monitor the functionality of a catalyst, a gas sensor could be placed downstream of the catalytic converter, but then only the absolute concentration of a certain analyte gas is known. Therefore, a second sensor has to be placed upstream of the catalyst, allowing determining the conversion by taking into account the signal of the two gas sensors. Of special interest are hydrocarbon sensors, for which many approaches have been reported in literature [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, up to now, none of these principles has been serialized. In addition, two different sensors are expensive and they have to have the same functionality, which is difficult to realize, especially with respect to temperature control, sensor ageing, or cross sensitivities. The here-suggested concept consists of only one single device with an output signal that is a monotonous function of the conversion of the catalyst.

2. Sensing Principle

We recently presented a novel sensor device that could be used to measure directly the catalyst conversion by comparing the gas mixtures up- and downstream of a catalyst based on the mixed-potential principle. The sensor consists of a ceramic YSZ disc (YSZ: yttria stabilized zirconium dioxide) with an integrated heater, a reference (RE) and a working (WE) electrode (for details see [16]). An image of the device that is manufactured in high temperature co-fired ceramics (HTCC) can be seen in Figure 1. The heater provides sufficiently high temperatures for ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte as well as for suitable activity of the electrodes. Furthermore, it is designed to establish a circular temperature distribution in the range of some hundred °C while the rim of the disc is cold enough to apply there low-temperature sealings as for example commonly available plastic O-rings. Then, the device can be assembled in a setup as it is shown in the scheme in Figure 2. Two bodies for flow control are pressed onto the sensor to provide two hermetically sealed gas compartments that are still connected by the ion conductor.
The entire sensor device was initially realized as an experimental setup. It looks as shown in Figure 2. The YSZ sensor disc was placed between two PEEK housings so that one electrode (WE) faces a gas atmosphere (half-cell 2) with varying analyte, while the other electrode (RE) is exposed to a reference atmosphere (half-cell 1).
Now, the YSZ disc acts as a two-sided mixed potential sensor, with a mixed potential of each side that follows the mixed potential theory as explained for instance in [17,18,19].
Deduced from theory, the sensors voltage signal (US) should only depend on catalyst conversion (ξ) even on changing feed gas concentration [20]:
ΔUS = Us − Us(ξ = 0) = const.·ln(1 − ξ),
In Equation (1), the catalyst conversion ξ is defined by the concentrations of the analyte up- and downstream of the catalyst to be monitored (cupstream, cdownstream):
ξ = (cupstreamcdownstream)/cupstream
In our experimental setup, the gas concentrations in half-cell 1 and half-cell 2 represent the concentrations up- and downstream of the catalyst, respectively. This contribution presents typical mixed-potential measurements in lab atmosphere to verify these considerations. To simulate the behavior of increasing catalyst activity, the content of the analyte (propene) was firstly set constant in both atmospheres, half-cell 1 and 2, which is defined as the feed concentration and denotes 0% conversion, i.e., ξ = 0. Then, the propene concentration was stepwise reduced in half-cell 2. The ratio between reduced concentration and feed concentration was calculated to a conversion value ξ.

3. Experimental Results

We conducted this experiment three times with different propene feed concentrations in the range of 0 to 100% conversion. The sensor was constantly operated at 500 °C. The sensor signal, which is the measured voltage between both electrodes (US), was evaluated at each step. Time dependent raw data show stable values and a fast response. Figure 3 shows the sensor characteristic, i.e., the output voltage US as a function of the calculated conversion value ξ. As expected, all measured values are in good agreement to each other and are independent from the propene feed concentration. Note that all values of US shown here are not corrected but plotted as measured. Up to 90% propene conversion, the correlation between the theoretical curve and the data is impressing. Especially the fact that the sensor voltage does not depend on the propene concentration of half-cell 1 (cupstream) but only on the propene conversion ξ proves our concept. Slight differences occur at higher conversion values (low propene concentrations in half-cell 2, respectively). This effect is under study at the moment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van Nieuwstadt, M.; Upadhyay, D.; Yuan, F. Diagnostics for Diesel Oxidation Catalysts. SAE Tech. Paper 2005, 2005-01-3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beulertz, G.; Votsmeier, M.; Moos, R. In operando Detection of Three-Way Catalyst Aging by a Microwave-Based Method: Initial Studies. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Posada, F.; Bandivadekar, A. Global Overview of On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) Systems for Heavy-Duty Vehicles. The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Available online: http://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_Overview_OBD-HDVs_20150209.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2017).
  4. Biskupski, D.; Geupel, A.; Wiesner, K.; Fleischer, M.; Moos, R. Platform for a hydrocarbon exhaust gas sensor utilizing a pumping cell and a conductometric sensor. Sensors 2009, 9, 7498–7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hagen, G.; Dubbe, A.; Fischerauer, G.; Moos, R. Thick-film impedance based hydrocarbon detection based on chromium(III) oxide/zeolite interfaces. Sens. Actuators B 2006, 118, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hagen, G.; Leupold, N.; Wiegärtner, S.; Moos, R. Sensor Tool for Fast Catalyst Material Characterization. Top. Catal. 2017, 60, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, N.-H.; Akamatsu, T.; Itoh, T.; Izu, N.; Shin, W. Calorimetric thermoelectric gas sensor for the detection of hydrogen, methane and mixed gases. Sensors 2014, 14, 8350–8362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sahner, K.; Fleischer, M.; Magori, E.; Meixner, H.; Deerberg, J.; Moos, R. HC-sensor for exhaust gases based on semiconducting doped SrTiO3 for On-Board Diagnosis. Sens. Actuators B 2006, 114, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schmidt-Zhang, P.; Guth, U. A planar thick film sensor for hydrocarbon monitoring in exhaust gases. Sens. Actuators B 2004, 99, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sekhar, P.K.; Kysar, J.; Brosha, E.L.; Kreller, C.R. Development and testing of an electrochemical methane sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 228, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wiegärtner, S.; Hagen, G.; Kita, J.; Reitmeier, W.; Hien, M.; Grass, P.; Moos, R. Thermoelectric hydrocarbon sensor in thick-film technology for on-board-diagnostics of a diesel oxidation catalyst. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 214, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, M.-C.; Micheli, A.L. Calorimetric hydrocarbon sensor for automotive exhaust applications. Sens. Actuators B 2004, 100, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zosel, J.; Westphal, D.; Jakobs, S.; Müller, R.; Guth, U. Au–oxide composites as HC-sensitive electrode material for mixed potential gas sensors. Solid State Ion. 2002, 152–153, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moos, R. A Brief Overview on Automotive Exhaust Gas Sensors Based on Electroceramics. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2005, 2, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Riegel, J. Exhaust gas sensors for automotive emission control. Solid State Ion. 2002, 152–153, 783–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ritter, T.; Hagen, G.; Kita, J.; Wiegärtner, S.; Schubert, F.; Moos, R. Self-heated HTCC-based ceramic disc for mixed potential sensors and for direct conversion sensors for automotive catalysts. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 248, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guth, U.; Zosel, J. Electrochemical solid electrolyte gas sensors—Hydrocarbon and NOx analysis in exhaust gases. Ionics 2004, 10, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miura, N.; Sato, T.; Anggraini, S.A.; Ikeda, H.; Zhuiykov, S. A review of mixed-potential type zirconia-based gas sensors. Ionics 2014, 20, 901–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fergus, J.W. Sensing mechanism of non-equilibrium solid-electrolyte-based chemical sensors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2011, 15, 971–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hagen, G.; Burger, K.; Wiegärtner, S.; Schönauer-Kamin, D.; Moos, R. A mixed potential based sensor that measures directly catalyst conversion—A novel approach for catalyst on-board diagnostics. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 217, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Image of the YSZ sensor disc. The integrated heater meanders around a Pt electrode and is embedded in an insulation layer. It is also buried in the middle of the YSZ disc to provide a homogenous temperature distribution at the electrodes.
Figure 1. Image of the YSZ sensor disc. The integrated heater meanders around a Pt electrode and is embedded in an insulation layer. It is also buried in the middle of the YSZ disc to provide a homogenous temperature distribution at the electrodes.
Proceedings 01 00424 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of the sensor setup to compare electrochemically two gas mixtures.
Figure 2. Scheme of the sensor setup to compare electrochemically two gas mixtures.
Proceedings 01 00424 g002
Figure 3. Sensor signal over propene conversion on simulating catalyst behavior for different propene feed concentrations, while the sensor temperature was set to 500 °C. The black curve is calculated from Equation (1) with Us(ξ = 0) = 7.5 mV, for the present sensing principle.
Figure 3. Sensor signal over propene conversion on simulating catalyst behavior for different propene feed concentrations, while the sensor temperature was set to 500 °C. The black curve is calculated from Equation (1) with Us(ξ = 0) = 7.5 mV, for the present sensing principle.
Proceedings 01 00424 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ritter, T.; Hagen, G.; Moos, R. Direct Catalyst Conversion Sensor in Form of a Single Self-Heated Mixed-Potential Device. Proceedings 2017, 1, 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040424

AMA Style

Ritter T, Hagen G, Moos R. Direct Catalyst Conversion Sensor in Form of a Single Self-Heated Mixed-Potential Device. Proceedings. 2017; 1(4):424. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ritter, Thomas, Gunter Hagen, and Ralf Moos. 2017. "Direct Catalyst Conversion Sensor in Form of a Single Self-Heated Mixed-Potential Device" Proceedings 1, no. 4: 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040424

APA Style

Ritter, T., Hagen, G., & Moos, R. (2017). Direct Catalyst Conversion Sensor in Form of a Single Self-Heated Mixed-Potential Device. Proceedings, 1(4), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040424

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop