Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Breast Cancer Classification: A Comparative Analysis of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering Biomolecular Networks: Integrating Methods for Comprehensive Insights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Classical and Non-Classical Compound Combinations for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3 †

1
Department of Biology, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
2
Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Molecular Biology “Acad. Rumen Tzanev”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Department Biotechnology, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, 9000 Gent, Belgium
5
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biomolecules, 23–25 April 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IECBM2024.
Proceedings 2024, 103(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024103042
Published: 12 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biomolecules)

Abstract

:
Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of death among men. Our study focuses on seeking new compounds and combinations to diminish the severe side effects of classical anticancer drugs for treating this type of cancer. In this study, we investigated and compared the classical anticancer drug docetaxel and non-classical compounds, Au porphyrin, and the plant lectin jacalin, and in different combinations on the prostate cancer cell line PC3. Jacalin, isolated from jackfruit seeds by affinity chromatography on immobilized galactose, specifically recognizes the tumor-associated Thomsen–Friedenreich antigen. The present investigation shows the interaction of jacalin with Au porphyrin, registering conformational changes within the protein due to the binding. From the titration curve, the affinity of 1.8 ± 0.39 µM for the jacalin—Au porphyrin complex was calculated. In vitro experiments with PC3 cells treated with docetaxel, Au porphyrin, jacalin and combinations indicated a decrease in cell viability. The IC50 for Au porphyrin and for docetaxel were studied and indicated that the calculated IC50 for docetaxel was 8 orders of magnitude higher than that for Au porphyrin. Interestingly, we found that jacalin-Au porphyrin complex is more cytotoxic reaching cell viability of 34%, than docetaxel-Au-porphyrin complex (with cell viability above 50%). Our results demonstrate the effects of three compounds as well as the effects of their combinations upon PC3 cells. Interestingly, low concentrations of the plant lectin jacalin (3 µM) facilitated the cell cytotoxicity of Au-porphyrin, showing new perspectives in cancer treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.B.; methodology, L.P.; software, T.A.; validation, N.G.; formal analysis, L.P.; investigation, D.Z., T.O. and N.G.; resources, T.A.; data curation, V.B. and D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.B., D.Z. and L.P.; writing—review and editing, V.B., E.J.M.V.D. and D.Z.; visualization, L.P., D.Z. and T.A.; supervision, V.B.; project administration, V.B.; funding acquisition, V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Bulgarian National Science Fund, Contract KП-06/H41/9.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

We are in a process of writing a manuscript, where the new data and figures will be published.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petrova, L.; Zasheva, D.; Gergov, N.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Oreshkova, T.; Bogoeva, V.; Aleksandrova, T. Classical and Non-Classical Compound Combinations for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3. Proceedings 2024, 103, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024103042

AMA Style

Petrova L, Zasheva D, Gergov N, Van Damme EJM, Oreshkova T, Bogoeva V, Aleksandrova T. Classical and Non-Classical Compound Combinations for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3. Proceedings. 2024; 103(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024103042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petrova, Lidiya, Diana Zasheva, Nikolay Gergov, Els J. M. Van Damme, Tsvetelina Oreshkova, Vanya Bogoeva, and Teodora Aleksandrova. 2024. "Classical and Non-Classical Compound Combinations for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3" Proceedings 103, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024103042

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop