Next Article in Journal
Non-Contact Detection of Steel Corrosion Using Sub-Terahertz Waves
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Application of Heat Source Reconstruction and Second-Harmonic Thermoelastic Stress Analysis for Rapid Metal Fatigue Characterisation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

WTB-IRT: Modelling and Measurement of Thermal Contrast in Wind Turbine Rotor Blades (WTBs) †

by
Somsubhro Chaudhuri
*,
Rainer Krankenhagen
,
Ivana Lapšanská
and
Michael Stamm
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), 12205 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 18th International Workshop on Advanced Infrared Technology and Applications (AITA 2025), Kobe, Japan, 15–19 September 2025.
Proceedings 2025, 129(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129015
Published: 12 September 2025

Abstract

The rapid growth of wind energy infrastructure over the past two to three decades has led to an urgent need for advanced non-destructive testing (NDT) methods—both for newly installed wind turbine blades (WTBs) and for ageing components nearing the end of their service life. Among emerging techniques, passive infrared thermography (IRT) offers a promising solution by enabling contactless, time-efficient inspection based on naturally occurring thermal variations. The effectiveness of passive IRT depends on the presence of sufficient thermal contrast to distinguish surface features, subsurface structures, and defects. To better understand the possibility of obtaining such contrast in composite structures such as WTBs, a controlled study was carried out on a blade section exposed to programmed temperature transients in a climate chamber. Infrared measurements were recorded, and the thermal behaviour of the specimen was simulated using finite element models (FEM) in COMSOL Multiphysics 6.3. Although direct validation is limited by measurement uncertainties and transient effects, the comparison provides insight into the capabilities and limitations of FEM in replicating real-world thermal behaviour. This paper focuses specifically on the challenges related to the modelling approach.

1. Introduction

Passive infrared thermography (IRT) offers the advantage of enabling ground-based inspections of operational WTBs with reduced turbine downtime compared to rope access methods. In addition, IRT can capture subsurface features [1]. The quality of such thermal inspections depends largely on the occurrence of thermal contrasts, which is influenced by both environmental conditions and the internal structure of the blade. The first reporting of IRT on WTB was in 2005 by Meinlschmidt and Aderhold, where they showed the detection of inner features in WTBs laying on the ground (i.e., unmounted), as well as on operational turbines [2]. The authors showed that both active as well as passive IRT could reveal interesting features, with the latter using boundary conditions such as solar irradiation and air temperature variations as sources of thermal excitation.
In operational settings, the appearance and disappearance of thermal contrasts on wind turbine rotor blade surfaces due to diurnal temperature changes remain insufficiently studied. The influencing factors include the environment conditions before and during a measurement, as well as the surface properties, inner structure, and thermal properties of the WTB. Studies have been performed that attempted to incorporate these variables into a finite element model (FEM) and validate it with experimental results [3,4]. However, as complex environmental conditions are challenging to accurately reproduce in simulations, an experiment in a controlled environment such as a (large enough) climate chamber would be fitting. They are already used for calibration of IRT cameras [5]. Although there is evidence of WTBs being tested in climate chambers, no investigation of the evolution of thermal contrast was found in the literature. Such controlled boundary conditions can be used as reliable input for FEM simulations, given that the geometry and structure of the WTB is known.
This paper briefly discusses the evaluation of a FEM simulation of a test performed in a climate chamber with controlled temperature transients, focussing on the challenges associated with modelling the various boundary conditions. The conference presentation includes results from the evaluation of thermal contrast.

2. Methodology

A section of a decommissioned WTB of an unknown manufacturer was investigated. Figure 1a shows the investigated suction side (SS), and Figure 1b shows the cross-section of the blade. Access to the cross-section enabled the design of a model for simulations in COMSOL Multiphysics, shown in Figure 1c. The specimen has also been investigated in a previous study performed with active thermography and under natural weather conditions [3]. The leading edge (LE) is covered with LE damage protection, and the hollowed spaces were filled with crumpled paper to limit air exchange with the surroundings (imitating “closed WTB”, i.e., the real world).
The climate chamber is of dimensions 1800 × 6000 × 2000 mm equivalent to a volume of 21 m3. The WTB section as well as the IRT camera are shown in Figure 2a. Figure 2b presents three separately measured temperature transients within the chamber, compared with the input programme consisting of heating and cooling at 2 K/hour. Temperature sensor “therm_1” is used to regulate the air in the climate chamber, with “therm_2” (also seen in Figure 2a) measuring the air temperature closer to the specimen. The transient measured with “therm_2” was used as input for the FEM simulations. Tslit, obtained from the IRT measurements, represents the temperature of the interior wall of the chamber. The camera used is an InfraTec ImageIR 8800 (InfraTec GmbH, Dresden, Germany) with a cooled MCT sensor, a calibration range of −10 to 40 °C, and NETD of <30 mK. Optics with a focal length of 25 mm and an integration time of 453 µs at 1 frame per second were used. The camera setting resulted in a spatial resolution of 1.5 mm/pixel.
The FEM was meshed with balanced data convergence and simulation time. Thermal processes were only simulated within a cross-section slice of the profile, but not along the original blade axis (horizontal in Figure 3a). Therefore, the simulated surface temperature was simply extracted along the horizontal axis in Figure 3b), resulting in a regular striped pattern. This makes it considerably easier to compare the data graphically with the thermogram. Thermal properties were consistent with previous work of the same specimen [3], with the primary difference being the convective heat transfer coefficient h applied to replicate the conditions in the climate chamber. hfront = 40 W/m2K was used for the side of the WTB section facing the camera and the chamber’s fans, hrear = 5 W/m2K for the rear side, and hinner = 0 W/m2K for the inside of the blade. These values were derived from empirical relations for multiple large diameter impinging jets [6].

3. Results

Figure 3a shows a thermogram after 85 min of heating at 2 K/hour. The foam section appears warmer compared to thick GFRP and glue due to its relatively higher thermal diffusivity, and thin GFRP appears warmer compared to thicker GFRP due to differences in material thickness. The spar cap warms slower than the surrounding thick GFRP as there is more material with more heat capacity to absorb the heat (the glue attaching the shear web to the spar cap). FEM simulations also accurately capture these thermal contrasts (Figure 3b), apart from some inhomogeneous features in the blade (foam irregularity in Figure 3a below the “Foam” annotation) that were not modelled in the simulation. It is important to highlight that the FEM does not capture the tapered chord length (distance between LE and TE), as explained above. In Figure 3c, the evolution of the thermal contrast between the LE glue and the thin GFRP (also at LE; both ROIs are visible in Figure 3a) is shown for the entire measurement period. During the heating phase, the simulation shows good agreement with the experimental data, and the contrast exceeds the NETD of the IR camera and thus can be deemed to be detectable. However, during the hold phase (at 303 K), a stark deviation occurs between the FEM and experimental data, which continues into the cooling phase. This may be attributed to spatial inhomogeneity of the climate chamber during the heating and cooling transitions, which is not part of the model as the transient temperature used as input is in only one location, i.e., near the TE (see Figure 2a). The outcome of the conducted experiment and corresponding simulation indicates that LE contrast can be detected thermographically in the absence of solar irradiation only when the air temperature changes by at least 2 K/h for a sustained period of 15 min or more. This contrast, however, holds as long as the temperature keeps rising or falling, which indicates large time windows for thermographic inspections of operational WTBs. This conclusion is specific to the geometry of the LE glue joint investigated.

4. Conclusions

This study aimed to validate a thermal FEM of a wind turbine blade (WTB) section using a simplified climate chamber experiment. The specimen underwent a symmetric heating–cooling cycle, with surface temperatures recorded using infrared thermography. Model validation included comparisons of thermograms, transients, profile lines, and thermal contrast at an internal feature. The FEM simulation accurately captured surface temperature evolution, with deviations limited to 0.1–0.2 K over a 2 K/hour transient over 4 h. These differences stemmed from unmodelled boundary effects. The simulation reliably predicted thermal contrast development at the leading-edge bond under overcast conditions (as no solar irradiation was implemented or modelled). Future work will extend the model to account for sun, wind, and clear-sky scenarios.

Author Contributions

S.C.: Methodology, Software, Hardware, Data Curation, Inspection, FEM, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing, Visualisation. R.K.: Conceptualisation, FEM, Data Curation, Validation, Writing, Visualisation. I.L.: Hardware, Inspection, Data curation, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. M.S.: Visualisation, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The experiments were carried out in the frame of the EvalTherm-project which was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under grant number 03EE3035A. The authors would like to thank the funding agency Projektträger Jülich.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff from BAM 7.2 for their assistance in using their climate chamber, specifically Patrick Simon and Marc Thiele. The authors would also like to thank Julien Lecompagnon for the Python libraries used for data processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vollmer, M.; Möllmann, K.P. Infrared Thermal Imaging: Fundamentals, Research and Applications; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Meinlschmidt, P.; Aderhold, J. Thermographic Inspection of Rotor Blades. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on NDT, Berlin, Germany, 25–29 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaudhuri, S.; Stamm, M.; Krankenhagen, R. Weather-dependent passive thermography and thermal simulation of in-service wind turbine blades. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2507, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Worzewski, T.; Krankenhagen, R.; Doroshtnasir, M.; Röllig, M.; Maierhofer, C.; Steinfurth, H. Thermographic inspection of a wind turbine rotor blade segment utilizing natural conditions as excitation source, Part I: Solar excitation for detecting deep structures in GFRP. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2016, 76, 756–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brazane, S.; Riou, O.; Delaleux, F.; Ibos, L.; Durastanti, J.F. Management of thermal drift of bolometric infrared cameras: Limits and recommendations. Quant. InfraRed Thermogr. J. 2025, 22, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zuckerman, N.; Lior, N. Jet Impingement Heat Transfer: Physics, Correlations, and Numerical Modeling. In Advances in Heat Transfer; Greene, G.A., Hartnett, J.P., Bar-Cohen, A., Cho, Y.I., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 565–631. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Suction side of WTB section investigated in a climate chamber; (b) cross-section of the investigated specimen; (c) FEM built in COMSOL Multiphysics using the cross-section.
Figure 1. (a) Suction side of WTB section investigated in a climate chamber; (b) cross-section of the investigated specimen; (c) FEM built in COMSOL Multiphysics using the cross-section.
Proceedings 129 00015 g001
Figure 2. (a) Annotated photograph of WTB section within the climate chamber along with the IRT camera; (b) comparison of different temperature transients measured within the climate chamber: “Input Program” represents the input programme defined for the climate chamber; “therm_1” is the air temperature directly at the fan that controls the chamber; “therm_2” is the air temperature nearby the specimen; Tslit is an estimated wall temperature observed by the IRT camera.
Figure 2. (a) Annotated photograph of WTB section within the climate chamber along with the IRT camera; (b) comparison of different temperature transients measured within the climate chamber: “Input Program” represents the input programme defined for the climate chamber; “therm_1” is the air temperature directly at the fan that controls the chamber; “therm_2” is the air temperature nearby the specimen; Tslit is an estimated wall temperature observed by the IRT camera.
Proceedings 129 00015 g002
Figure 3. (a) Annotated thermogram after 85 min of heating at 2 K/hour; (b) corresponding FEM simulation of the same time step; (c) evolution of contrast between the LE glue ROI and thin GFRP ROI across the temperature transient shown in Figure 2b. The different cycles with heating up, holding, and cooling as well as the NETD level are indicated by background colouring.
Figure 3. (a) Annotated thermogram after 85 min of heating at 2 K/hour; (b) corresponding FEM simulation of the same time step; (c) evolution of contrast between the LE glue ROI and thin GFRP ROI across the temperature transient shown in Figure 2b. The different cycles with heating up, holding, and cooling as well as the NETD level are indicated by background colouring.
Proceedings 129 00015 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaudhuri, S.; Krankenhagen, R.; Lapšanská, I.; Stamm, M. WTB-IRT: Modelling and Measurement of Thermal Contrast in Wind Turbine Rotor Blades (WTBs). Proceedings 2025, 129, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129015

AMA Style

Chaudhuri S, Krankenhagen R, Lapšanská I, Stamm M. WTB-IRT: Modelling and Measurement of Thermal Contrast in Wind Turbine Rotor Blades (WTBs). Proceedings. 2025; 129(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaudhuri, Somsubhro, Rainer Krankenhagen, Ivana Lapšanská, and Michael Stamm. 2025. "WTB-IRT: Modelling and Measurement of Thermal Contrast in Wind Turbine Rotor Blades (WTBs)" Proceedings 129, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129015

APA Style

Chaudhuri, S., Krankenhagen, R., Lapšanská, I., & Stamm, M. (2025). WTB-IRT: Modelling and Measurement of Thermal Contrast in Wind Turbine Rotor Blades (WTBs). Proceedings, 129(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop