Next Article in Journal
Laser Thermography as Non-Destructive Technique to Detect Defects in AlSi10Mg Parts Printed with L-PBF Process
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Identification of Thermal Diffusivity, Thickness, and Heating Center Point Based on Surface Temperature Variation Excited by Laser-Spot Heating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net †

by
Leith Bounenni
,
Clemente Ibarra Castanedo
and
Xavier Maldague
*
Department of Electrical and Computing Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 18th International Workshop on Advanced Infrared Technology and Applications (AITA 2025), Kobe, Japan, 15–19 September 2025.
Proceedings 2025, 129(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129042
Published: 12 September 2025

Abstract

In this research, we developed and tested an automated defect detection system for wind turbine blades using infrared thermography (IRT) and the deep learning model U-Net.

1. Introduction

The inspection of wind turbine blades [1,2] is very important for ensuring both the productivity and safety of wind energy systems. In this paper, we present the development of an automated defect detection system that uses infrared thermography (IRT) to extract the database and the U-Net deep learning model to identify defects in wind turbine blades. We began with a theoretical analysis using COMSOL 6.3 simulations to study the best time of day for capturing infrared images in order to maximize the visibility of defects based on thermal conditions. Our second analysis allowed us to settle the limits of defect sizes in relation to their depths that could be detected using infrared thermography. The simulated defects were air cavities of different sizes, which were analyzed to evaluate the ability of our system in detecting those defects at different depths. Next, we used the U-Net deep learning model for the automatic detection of defects in the wind turbine blade infrared images. We used U-Net for its pixel segmentation of the defects, which provided accurate identification of the defect areas. Additionally, we employed image processing techniques in order to divide the images corresponding to different blades of the turbine. Then, we compared the images of the blades at the same positions using masks to improve the reliability of the defect detection. The findings of this work show that the proposed system successfully identifies defects of different sizes in turbine blades. However, this detection system faces a challenge with identifying false positives mistaken for real defects caused by some external factors like blade contamination and variable sunlight reflections due to clouds. Despite these limitations, the system provides a potential solution for automatically identifying defects in wind turbine blades, which improves productivity and decreases the need to perform manual visual drone inspections.

2. Thermal Modeling of the Wind Turbine Blades

For the simulation process, a wind turbine blade model was used, including a full-scale blade with dimensions of 60 m in length, 5 m in height, and 2 m in width, as shown in Figure 1. Our blade model contained four subsurface defects of different sizes.

3. Results of the Simulations

In order to study the best timing for capturing infrared images, we executed different simulations for the month of September. These simulations provided a sequence of infrared images that clearly showed the appearance of (simulated) defects, as shown in Figure 2. After this, we extracted the temperatures of the defect areas and the surface temperature from 10 consecutive points throughout the day, from 14:30 to 20:00, with measurements taken every 30 min. The choice of this time range was based on the solar radiation power being the most ideal for defect detection during these hours. The results of these simulations are illustrated in Figure 3. The simulations were performed in order to replicate a sunny day, and for the temperatures of the defect areas, we calculated the average temperature of the four defects simulated.

4. Field Image Acquisition

Following our preliminary study and the availability of equipment, we conducted fieldwork at a wind farm south of Quebec City on Thursday, 12 September 2024. The weather was cloudy in the morning and sunny in the afternoon, though with some clouds, which enabled infrared image capture between 16:00 and 18:00, and this was timed to align with the optimal conditions identified in our COMSOL study. We used a cooled FLIR (Wilsonville, OR, USA) model A6701 MWIR camera with a 100 mm lens, as shown in Figure 4.
We achieved a clear view of several sections of the wind turbine blades. During this test, infrared image sequences were recorded for two wind turbines.

5. Methodology–Image Processing

We developed several image processing techniques in order to isolate and locate possible defects on the infrared images of the two wind turbine blades we inspected. By employing these methods, we were able to clean the infrared images of the clouds in the background in order to prevent the detection of these clouds as defects and to improve the visibility of the defects. This methodology served to guarantee the correct study of different regions of the blades. We started by converting the raw infrared images to a binary format to feature the defect regions, followed by some morphological operations such as erosion and dilation in order to refine the images by eliminating noise and restoring the defect regions. Next, we applied some image processing methods for identifying and grouping similar images to split the sequences of the images. The images were divided into sub-lists corresponding to specific blade sections (Blade 1, Blade 2, and Blade 3) for localized defect analysis. Furthermore, we operated a comparison of images from various blades (Blade 1, Blade 2, and Blade 3) at the same location using multiple thresholds to assist us in identifying defects on the blades. The creation of the combined defect masks helped us in detecting minor variations between the images. This resulted in more uniform defect detection in the dataset [3].

6. Automatic Defect Detection Using U-Net

The automatic defect detection method using U-Net was successful in detecting many defects that had already been detected by the image comparison technique where the blades were compared at the same positions, as shown in Figure 5. Detection validation was performed with another approach [3]. The defects detected by both methods were considered as true defects. In contrast, the defects detected only by one method and, more specifically, those not validated by U-Net were considered false positives. This dual validation approach helped us in filtering out the errors caused by environmental conditions, like sunlight reflections or debris, reducing the chances of misinterpreting non-defect areas as actual defects. This was a preliminary analysis, and the network could be refined and better exploited.

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we developed and tested an automated defect detection system for wind turbine blades using infrared thermography and the deep learning model U-Net. We began our study with a theoretical study using COMSOL simulations in order to determine the best time of the day for capturing infrared images and the limitations of the defect detections in terms of size and depth.
Our approach included two main detection methods: image comparison across turbine blade images [3] and U-Net segmentation. U-Net allowed us to achieve precise defect localization by segmenting the infrared images pixel by pixel. This approach, mixing image comparison and deep learning, allowed us to cross-validate the detected defects, confirming (possible) true defects and identifying false positives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B., C.I.C. and X.M.; methodology, L.B., C.I.C. and X.M.; software, L.B.; validation, L.B., C.I.C. and X.M.; formal analysis, L.B.; investigation, L.B.; resources, C.I.C.; data curation, L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B.; writing—review and editing, L.B. and X.M.; visualization, L.B.; supervision, X.M.; project administration, X.M.; funding acquisition, X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by NSERC (RGPIN-2019-05255).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The database will eventually be made available on our website.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of both Laval University and the windfarm.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Stamm, M.; Krankenhagen, R. Weather-dependent passive thermography of unheated wind turbine blades. In Proceedings of the Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLIV, Orlando, FL, USA, 27 May 2022; pp. 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  2. Topilko, B.; Salloum, Z.; Méthot, B.; Loaiza-Correa, H.; Restrepo, A.D.; Maldague, X.P.V. Numerical and experimental study for the identification of defects in wind turbine blades by infrared thermography. In Proceedings of the LATAM-SHM 2023, (1st Latin-American Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15–17 November 2023. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leith, B. Détection de Défauts dans les Pales d’Éoliennes à l’Aide de la Thermographie Infrarouge, du Traitement d’Images et de U-Net. Master’s Thesis, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geometric model of the wind turbine blade.
Figure 1. Geometric model of the wind turbine blade.
Proceedings 129 00042 g001
Figure 2. Infrared image showing the appearance of defects.
Figure 2. Infrared image showing the appearance of defects.
Proceedings 129 00042 g002
Figure 3. Temperature curves for the September simulation results.
Figure 3. Temperature curves for the September simulation results.
Proceedings 129 00042 g003
Figure 4. Infrared camera setup with a 100 mm lens for the blade inspection.
Figure 4. Infrared camera setup with a 100 mm lens for the blade inspection.
Proceedings 129 00042 g004
Figure 5. Potential defects detected on the blade edge of the top right picture.
Figure 5. Potential defects detected on the blade edge of the top right picture.
Proceedings 129 00042 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bounenni, L.; Castanedo, C.I.; Maldague, X. Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net. Proceedings 2025, 129, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129042

AMA Style

Bounenni L, Castanedo CI, Maldague X. Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net. Proceedings. 2025; 129(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bounenni, Leith, Clemente Ibarra Castanedo, and Xavier Maldague. 2025. "Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net" Proceedings 129, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129042

APA Style

Bounenni, L., Castanedo, C. I., & Maldague, X. (2025). Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net. Proceedings, 129(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129042

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop