Next Article in Journal
Monitoring Surface Stoichiometry, Work Function and Valance Band of Tungsten Oxide (WO3), Molybdenum Oxide (MoO3) and Tin Oxide (SnO2) Thin Films as a Function of Temperature and Oxygen Partial Pressure with Advanced Surface Sensitive Techniques for Chemical Sensing Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

Surface Properties of SnO2 Nanolayers Deposited by Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation for Potential Gas Sensor Applications †

by
Barbara Lyson-Sypien
1,*,
Monika Kwoka
1 and
Maciej Krzywiecki
2,*
1
Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Institute of Electronics, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics—Center for Science and Education, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 8th GOSPEL Workshop. Gas Sensors Based on Semiconducting Metal Oxides: Basic Understanding & Application Fields, Ferrara, Italy, 20–21 June 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 14(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014025
Published: 19 June 2019
Published: 19 June 2019

Aim

Within this work the advantages of Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation i.e. maximal extension of internal surfaces, small degree of nanograins agglomeration and reduced influence of undesired contaminations together with exceedingly well—promising features of SnO2 in terms of gas detection, have driven us to study RGVO SnO2 nanolayers for potential gas sensing applications. Moreover, the influence of doping SiO2 substrate with Cr and Al on the surface chemistry and morphology of RGVO SnO2 nanolayers is under investigation.

Results

For the purpose of the better understanding the surface chemical properties, with the special empathizes on nonstoichiometry, carbon contaminations, the relative concentrations of the main components and bondings, the XPS technique was applied. Figure 1a demonstrates XPS survey spectra with the main core level lines for RGVO SnO2 nanostructures deposited on SiO2 substrates for as deposited and additionally oxidized samples. As it can be clearly seen, the spectra contain well recognized peaks related to O1s, Sn3d, and Sn4d (basic components of the expected SnO2). The contribution of adventitious C contamination has not been detected neither in the case of raw samples nor after additional oxidation. The inset to Figure 1a shows the respective O–Sn3d spectral window required for the quantitative analysis of the surface chemistry performed in the subsequent part of the paper. In the case of RGVO SnO2 nanolayers deposited on SiO2 substrate modified with Cr and Al additives (also as deposited and after additional oxidation) the only visible XPS core level peaks also belong to the expected SnO2 compound (Figure 1b). There is no contribution from Cr nor Al that can be treated as an indirect proof of the continuous SnO2 nanolayer formation. The results of the calculation of the atomic relative concentrations [O]/[Sn] are presented in Table 1. As it can be seen, SnO2 nanolayers are highly nonstoichiometric—namely oxygen deficient. This leads to conclusion that the obtained oxides are the mixture of SnO2 with significant contribution of SnO phase which is present in both: RGVO SnO2 samples obtained on pure as well as on doped substrates. A slight increase in [O]/[Sn] can be observed each time in the case of the samples that underwent additional oxidation. Moreover the atomic relative concentration [O]/[Sn] is higher for nanolayers deposited on the substrates covered with Cr and Al.
Figure 2 shows the AFM data of RGVO SnO2 nanolayers containing the 3D image, average grain height distribution and the respective depth profile. As it can be seen from AFM data, that
RGVO SnO2 nanolayers exhibit the grain type surface morphology. The lateral grain dimension is in the range of 15–50 nm, whereas their height is at the level of several nm with distribution of maximum at ~5 nm, what finally causes that these nanolayers are of high flatness in a large surface area up to several µm.

Funding

This research was funded by the research grant of National Science Centre, Poland grant decision DEC-2016/20/S/ST5/00165 and partially realized within the Statutory Funding of Institute of Electronics, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, BK as well as BKM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figure 1. XPS survey spectra with the main core level lines of: (a) RGVO SnO2 nanolayers deposited on SiO2 substrate both as deposited and after additional oxidation, together with the corresponding O – Sn3d spectral window (in the inset); (b) RGVO SnO2 nanolayers deposited on SiO2 substrate modified with Cr and Al additives both as deposited and after additional oxidation, together with the corresponding O–Sn3d spectral window (in the inset).
Figure 1. XPS survey spectra with the main core level lines of: (a) RGVO SnO2 nanolayers deposited on SiO2 substrate both as deposited and after additional oxidation, together with the corresponding O – Sn3d spectral window (in the inset); (b) RGVO SnO2 nanolayers deposited on SiO2 substrate modified with Cr and Al additives both as deposited and after additional oxidation, together with the corresponding O–Sn3d spectral window (in the inset).
Proceedings 14 00025 g001
Figure 2. AFM data of RGVO SnO2 nanolayers including the main image, average height distribution and the layer’s edge profile.
Figure 2. AFM data of RGVO SnO2 nanolayers including the main image, average height distribution and the layer’s edge profile.
Proceedings 14 00025 g002
Table 1. The results of XPS investigation: relative intensity (RI) of XPS lines and the atomic relative concentrations (ARC) of the main components for RGVO SnO2 nanolayers.
Table 1. The results of XPS investigation: relative intensity (RI) of XPS lines and the atomic relative concentrations (ARC) of the main components for RGVO SnO2 nanolayers.
SamplesXPS lines RIARC
SubstratesRGVO SnO2O1s (a.u.)Sn3d5/2 (a.u.)[O]/[Sn]
Pure SiO2As-deposited473400.90
After oxidation483360.93
SiO2 covered with Cr and AlAs-deposited463280.95
After oxidation503201.02

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lyson-Sypien, B.; Kwoka, M.; Krzywiecki, M. Surface Properties of SnO2 Nanolayers Deposited by Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation for Potential Gas Sensor Applications. Proceedings 2019, 14, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014025

AMA Style

Lyson-Sypien B, Kwoka M, Krzywiecki M. Surface Properties of SnO2 Nanolayers Deposited by Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation for Potential Gas Sensor Applications. Proceedings. 2019; 14(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lyson-Sypien, Barbara, Monika Kwoka, and Maciej Krzywiecki. 2019. "Surface Properties of SnO2 Nanolayers Deposited by Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation for Potential Gas Sensor Applications" Proceedings 14, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop