Next Article in Journal
Arguments for the Need to Modernize Water Treatment Technology in Small Towns and Cities, Based on the Example of the Municipality of Puńsk
Previous Article in Journal
Agricultural Biogas Plant Location Selection Using MCDA Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

An Evaluation of Primary Energy Factor Values of Wind Turbines †

by
Rokas Tamašauskas
1,
Jolanta Šadauskienė
2,*,
Patrikas Bruzgevičius
3 and
Dorota Anna Krawczyk
4
1
JSC “Planuotojai”, Vasario 16-osios str. 8-6, LT-44250 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų st. 48, LT-51367 Kaunas, Lithuania
3
JSC “Įraža”, Tunelio str. 60, LT-4440 Kaunas, Lithuania
4
Faculty of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45 E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Innovations-Sustainability-Modernity-Openness Conference (ISMO’19), Bialystok, Poland, 22–23 May 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 16(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019016009
Published: 12 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Innovations-Sustainability-Modernity-Openness Conference (ISMO’19))

Abstract

:
In order to fulfil the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) requirements regarding the reduction of energy consumption in buildings, much attention has been paid to primary energy consumption. Wind energy is one type of primary energy. The analysis of the literature has revealed that wind energy is evaluated by different methods. Therefore, the aim of this article was to calculate the effect of the parameters of wind sources on the primary energy factor of wind turbines. In order to achieve this aim, the primary energy factor of 100 investigated wind turbines and 11 wind farms operating in Lithuania was calculated. Investigation results showed that the difference of the non-renewable primary energy factor between wind turbines due to capacity is 35%. This paper provides a recommendation with regard to EU energy efficiency and renewable energy directives and regulations: All EU member states should use the same or very similar methodology for the calculation of the primary energy factor of renewable and non-renewable energy sources.

1. Introduction

Directive 2010/31/EU recommends the use of renewable energy sources and reduction of the share of non-renewable energy in buildings by erecting energy-efficient buildings. One of the parameters of renewable energy sources is the primary energy factor (PEF) [1,2,3]. It is used for the setting of the demand of primary energy required to produce one unit of secondary energy. That means that the energy efficiency of a building is calculated as the balance of used and produced energy. The renewable primary energy factor (ƒP,ren) is assessed, but the non-renewable primary energy factor (ƒP,nren) depends on the additional energy consumed in the conversion device, which normally uses additional non-renewable energy, such as electrical energy, a common grid or fuel [4]. The investigation of wind turbine systems does not provide information due to the non-renewable energy in these systems [5]. However, wind turbine generators usually account for part of the energy used in wind farms from electricity grids, supplying common energy to buildings.
The PEF of electrical energy produced on-site/nearby or renewable energy supplied from the electrical grid has a direct influence on the calculation of the total PEF. There are two possibilities: To increase the share of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in electrical grids or to use electricity produced on-site/nearby from renewable sources, including wind turbines.
The analyzed literature did not give sufficient information on PEF value calculation; the obtained PEF values were very different for the same type of energy, and many different methodologies were used to calculate those values [6,7,8]. Only with sufficiently accurate data on wind renewable (ƒP,ren) and non-renewable (ƒP,nren) primary factors can the amount of renewable and non-renewable primary energy consumed in a building be objectively calculated.
Therefore, the aim of this article is to find the effect of wind energy parameters on the primary wind energy value and to calculate PEFs for wind turbines of different capacities.

2. Methods

Data for the investigation (for the period 2007–2014) were collected from 100 wind turbines and 11 wind farms operating in Lithuania. The data were collected by interviewing wind turbine owners/operators and by analyzing the reports of electricity transmission system operators in Lithuania [9]. In the end, six wind farms and eight wind turbines were selected for the study. Most of the investigated wind turbine or wind farm operators were unable to provide data on the main characteristics of wind turbines; because they do not collect and do not systemize the data, they do not have accounting tools or are connected to other electricity consumers. The wind turbines were classified into groups of different capacities ((>10) MW and (<10) MW) to determine their PEFs, and afterwards to compare the obtained values with the values provided in EN 15603:2014 [10]. The total primary energy may be calculated by Equation (1) according to the regulation of EN 15603:2014 [10]:
f P , t o t = f P , n r e n + f P , r e n ,
where ƒP,tot is the total primary energy, kW·h; ƒP,nren is the non-renewable primary energy, kW·h; and ƒP,ren is the renewable primary energy, kW·h.
It is assumed that all the energy supplied to the building is attributable to renewable energy because it is made from renewable wind energy. Accordingly, the renewable primary energy factor ƒP,ren is (Equation (3)):
f P , r e n = 1 ;
The value of the primary non-renewable energy factor fP,nren produced by wind turbines is given by the following formula (Equation (4)):
f P , n r e n = E a , n r e n E r e n ; ,
where Ea,nren is the amount of additionally consumed non-renewable energy (from the electrical grid), apart from the produced electricity of the wind turbines, designed to be supplied into the building, kWh/year;
Eren is the the amount of electrical energy which is produced in wind turbines and supplied into the building, kWh/year.
The calculation of the value of the primary energy factor of the electricity produced by wind turbines was done according to the data provided by the power plants [9].

3. Results and Discussion

The calculated fP,nren factors of the analyzed wind turbines/farms are presented in Figure 1.
The data presented in Figure 1a show that the average numeric indicator of the fP,nren factor in wind turbines/farms of (>10) MW capacity was 0.012 kW·h (the dotted line). The wind turbine 1A had the lowest fP,nren factor, whose value was 0.001; the wind turbines 4A and 5A had the highest factor, whose value was 0.022 kW·h.
The average numeric indicator of the fP,nren factor in wind turbines/farms of (>10) MW capacity illustrated in Figure 1b was 0.009 (the dotted line). The wind turbines 1B, 4B, 5B, and 8B had the lowest fP,nren factor (value is 0.001), and the wind turbine 7B had the highest factor, whose value was 0.052.
The obtained results lead to the conclusion that the fP,nren factor value is influenced by the capacity of wind turbines. A trend is observed that in wind turbines of (>10) MW capacity this indicator decreases with a higher installed power capacity of wind turbines.
The results of the PEF calculation are presented in Table 1.
The investigation showed that the value of non-renewable PEF of wind turbines/farms of (>10) MW capacity was bigger (fP,nren = 0.012) than that of the wind turbines/farms of (<10) MW capacity (fP,nren = 0.009). This was a 35% difference. Accordingly, the total value of PEF may depend on the number of different wind turbines/farms regarding the capacity of wind turbines. The methodology provided in EN 15603 provides only one PEF value for wind turbines irrespective of their capacity. The primary investigation showed that the aspect of the capacity of wind turbines should be assessed for the determination of PEF. This outcome is primary, which drew attention to the need for further research.
Overall, the findings of this work indicate that a number of parameters can influence the value of PEF. This study has provided guidelines for PEF determination; nevertheless, each case should be carefully examined on an individual building basis, especially when there is no exact methodology for determining PEF values. However, PEF is important for setting precise primary energy values, which are used in energy policymaking and in defining energy-saving goals or energy consumption efficiency in international and national energy statistics, scenarios, environmental impact assessments, directives, and standards. Every European Union member state should define the primary energy in wind turbines as well as the statistical parameters of wind turbines and the climate (wind speed, wind turbine capacity, conversion efficiency, turbine-power consumption, etc.).

4. Conclusions

The investigation showed that PEF may depend on the capacity of wind turbines. The value of the non-renewable energy factor fP,nren of the wind turbines/farms of (>10) MW capacity was 0.012 and it was 0.009 in the wind turbines/farms of (<10) MW capacity. This was a 35% difference. Therefore, the total value of PEF depends on the number of different wind turbines/farms and the capacity of wind turbines.
In order to achieve the goals set forth in EU energy efficiency and renewable energy directives and regulations, all EU member states should use the same or very similar methodology for the calculation of the primary energy factor of renewable and non-renewable energy sources.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors designed the calculations, discussed the results and implications, and commented on the manuscript at all stages. R.T. and P.B. calculated various primary factor values of non-renewable energy of wind power turbines of different capacities and interviewed wind turbine owners/operators. D.A.K. and J.Š. analyzed climate data and prepared the report of electricity transmission system operators. J.Š. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the Kaunas Technology University (KTU), funded by the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania. The results of this study were used in drafting the national Technical Regulation for Construction Works STR 2.01.09:2012 Certification of Energy Performance of Buildings, which shall ensure the implementation of the provisions and goals of Directive 2010/31/EU in Lithuania.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2018. Available online: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2019).
  2. Johannson, T.B.; Patwardhan, A.; Nakicenovic, N.; Gomez-Echeverri, L. Global Energy Assessment—Towards a Sustainable Future, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridgeshire, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Harmsen, R.; Wesselink, B.; Eichhammer, W.; Worrell, E. The unrecognized contribution of renewable energy to Europe’s energy savings target. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 3425–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shafiullah, M.G.; Amanullah, M.T.; Shawkat Ali, A.B.M.; Wolfs, P. Potential challenges of integrating large-scale wind energy into the power grid—A review. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hasan, S.N.; Hassan, Y.M.; Majid, S.M.; Rahman, A.H. Review of storage schemes for wind energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. BR18. Building Regulations Guidelines on Energy Consumption. Building Regulations. Available online: http://bygningsreglementet.dk (accessed on 1 March 2019). (In Danish).
  7. Energy Efficiency of Buildings. D3 Finnish Building Code Collection Ministry of the Environment, Department of Built Environment. Available online: http://www.finlex.fi/data/normit/37188-D3-2012_Suomi.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2019). (In Finnish).
  8. DIN-V 18599—Energetische Bewertung von Gebäuden; [CD-ROM]; Beuth Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2018; ISBN-13: 978-3410289463. (In German)
  9. Lithuanian Electricity Transmission System Operator (Litgrid). Available online: http://www.litgrid.eu/index.php/paslaugos/kilmes-garantiju-suteikimas/ataskaitos/563 (accessed on 5 December 2015). (In Lithuanian).
  10. EN 15603:2014; Energy Performance of Buildings—Overarching Standard EPBD. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
Figure 1. Relationship between fPnren and wind power in wind turbines/farms: (a) In (>10) MW wind turbines; (b) in (<10) MW wind turbines.
Figure 1. Relationship between fPnren and wind power in wind turbines/farms: (a) In (>10) MW wind turbines; (b) in (<10) MW wind turbines.
Proceedings 16 00009 g001
Table 1. The result of the primary energy factor (PEF) calculation.
Table 1. The result of the primary energy factor (PEF) calculation.
IndicatorsThe Values of the Capacities of the Wind Turbines Operated in LithuaniaWeighted Average
(>10) MW(<10) MW
fP,nren0.0120.0090.01
fP,ren111
fP,tot1.0121.0091.01
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tamašauskas, R.; Šadauskienė, J.; Bruzgevičius, P.; Krawczyk, D.A. An Evaluation of Primary Energy Factor Values of Wind Turbines. Proceedings 2019, 16, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019016009

AMA Style

Tamašauskas R, Šadauskienė J, Bruzgevičius P, Krawczyk DA. An Evaluation of Primary Energy Factor Values of Wind Turbines. Proceedings. 2019; 16(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019016009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tamašauskas, Rokas, Jolanta Šadauskienė, Patrikas Bruzgevičius, and Dorota Anna Krawczyk. 2019. "An Evaluation of Primary Energy Factor Values of Wind Turbines" Proceedings 16, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019016009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop