Next Article in Journal
NPK Fertilizers’ Coatings Using Biodegradable By-Products from the Agro-Food Industry
Previous Article in Journal
High Temperature Nanocomposite Phase Change Materials Containing Mesoporous Silica Matrices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

Clean Technologies Combining Phytoremediation with Biofuel Production—Part 1 †

1
OMV Petrom-ICPT Campina-Coralilor 22, sector 1, 013329 Bucureşti, Romania
2
National Institute of R&D for Biological Sciences, Independenței 296, 060031 București, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 15th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development” PRIOCHEM, Bucharest, Romania, 30 October–1 November 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 29(1), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029112
Published: 18 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development-PRIOCHEM)
One of the major problems that has been faced by the oil upstream industry is related to soil contamination caused by oilfield water pollution [1]. An efficient method of saline soil decontamination is phytoremediation. Halophytes (salt-tolerant plants) are ideal candidates for the phytoextraction of salt from soil [2]. The evaluation of the efficiency of the phytoremediation process was performed by monitoring the salinity of the soil during the life cycle of plants [3].
Initially, the contamination of the soil with reservoir water was evaluated in terms of salinity and hydrocarbon content. For this purpose, samples were collected using the grid method from the entire surface of the land, roughly 2000 m2, on three depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, 60–90 cm). The chloride concentration in the soil was determined using ion chromatography.
Depending on the distribution of the chloride concentration in the soil, in the next stage, the land was divided into six lots from which average soil samples were taken from a 0–60 cm depth.
From analyses initially carried out on soil samples taken from the entire surface of the land, the results showed that the soil was contaminated only with salt water, not with hydrocarbons. Based on the results obtained the modeling of chloride concentration distribution on the soil surface was undertaken. This is shown in Figure 1.
Based on the analysis of soil samples taken from the six lots, a 3D graphic representation of the chloride concentration is presented as shown in Figure 2.
These lots are periodically monitored to determine the efficiency of phytoremediation using different types of plants. Both soil samples and plants grown on the selected six lots will be analyzed.
The efficiency of the phytoremediation process of a strongly salted soil is monitored, during the life cycle of the plants, by analyzing the average soil samples taken from the selected six lots.

References

  1. Pichtel, J. Oil and Gas Production Wastewater: Soil Contamination and Pollution Prevention. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Padmavathiamma, P.K.; Ahmed, M.; Rahman, H.A. Phytoremediation-A sustainable approach for contaminant remediation in arid and semi-arid regions—A review. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2014, 26, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meehan, M.A.; Sedivec, K.K.; DeSutter, T.; Augustin, C.; Daigh, A. Environmental Impacts of Brine (Produced Water); NDSU: Fargo, ND, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Modeling of the chloride concentration distribution on the soil surface.
Figure 1. Modeling of the chloride concentration distribution on the soil surface.
Proceedings 29 00112 g001
Figure 2. A 3D model of chloride concentration distribution on the six lots.
Figure 2. A 3D model of chloride concentration distribution on the six lots.
Proceedings 29 00112 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cracica, A.; Paraschiv, M.; Dumitrescu, E.; Barbu, G.; Visoiu, R.; Vladimirescu, A.; Muresan, D. Clean Technologies Combining Phytoremediation with Biofuel Production—Part 1. Proceedings 2019, 29, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029112

AMA Style

Cracica A, Paraschiv M, Dumitrescu E, Barbu G, Visoiu R, Vladimirescu A, Muresan D. Clean Technologies Combining Phytoremediation with Biofuel Production—Part 1. Proceedings. 2019; 29(1):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cracica, Ana, Maria Paraschiv, Elena Dumitrescu, Gratiela Barbu, Ramona Visoiu, Andreia Vladimirescu, and Daniela Muresan. 2019. "Clean Technologies Combining Phytoremediation with Biofuel Production—Part 1" Proceedings 29, no. 1: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029112

APA Style

Cracica, A., Paraschiv, M., Dumitrescu, E., Barbu, G., Visoiu, R., Vladimirescu, A., & Muresan, D. (2019). Clean Technologies Combining Phytoremediation with Biofuel Production—Part 1. Proceedings, 29(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029112

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop