Next Article in Journal
Labial Lesion with Heterogeneous Aspects in a Patient with Chronic Renal Failure: Diagnostic Difficulties and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
MRONJ Treatment with Ultrasonic Navigation: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

The Outcome of Primary Root Canal Treatment in Post-Irradiated Patients: A Case Series †

1
Head and Neck Department, “Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli–IRCCS”. School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, “Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli–IRCCS”. Institute of Radiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, 00168,, Italy
3
Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, 80138, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XV National and III International Congress of the Italian Society of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO), Bari, Italy, 17–19 October 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 35(1), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035072
Published: 12 December 2019
Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for head and neck cancer. A multimodal approach combining RT with surgery and chemotherapy has produced a significant increase in patients’ survival rates. Patients who undergo RT may experience several adverse oral effects, among which Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is the most severe, and tooth extractions in irradiated jaws are considered as the most severe risk factor.
It is recommended that patients undergoing head and neck RT should have a dental assessment before the start of the RT to minimize the risk of developing ORN by removing oral foci. Sadly, not all patients are referred to a dentist before the beginning of the RT; thus, some patients might require dental extractions during or after radiotherapy. In these circumstances, endodontic treatment is generally preferred to extractions even in non-restorable elements [1].
A preoperative diagnostic digital radiograph was taken to assess the apical status and the dental conditions. All periapical radiographs showed the absence of a periapical radiolucency. All therapies were performed by the same surgeon in a single visit. An intraoperative, a postoperative and follow-up radiographs were taken. The maintenance of a normal contour and width of the periodontal ligament and the absence of clinical signs and symptoms were considered radiographic and clinical success [2].
All patients, after a 277-days (584-90 days) mean follow-up, were asymptomatic, and no teeth presented periapical radiolucency. No ORN was detected in the area of treated teeth. The administered radiation dose in the periapical area of treated teeth was calculated by contouring a 0.5 cm3 on the radiotherapy planning CT-scan. The patients received a total mean dose of 65 Gy, and the periapical mean dose was 39.36 Gy (range 22.4–63.4 Gy).
The success rate was 100%, regardless of the dose of RT received at the apex of the teeth or the time since patients underwent head and neck radiotherapy. No ORN was observed.
The novelty of this study was the measurement of the periapical radiation doses received by each treated tooth, since a correlation between apical periodontitis and radiation dose in irradiated patients has been shown [3]. However, the absence of ORN onset confirms the safety of the endodontic therapy in irradiated patients. A higher sample size is required to assess the success rate of primary root canal therapy in irradiated patients and to establish a correlation between success and radiation dose.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lilly, J.; Cox, D; Arcuri, M.; Krell, K. An evaluation of root canal treatment in patients who have received irradiation to the mandible and maxilla. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1998, 89, 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chugal, N.; Mallya, S.; Kahler, B.; Lin, L. Endodontic Treatment Outcomes. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 61, 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hommez, G.; De Meerleer, G.; De Neve, W.; De Moor, R. Effect of radiation dose on the prevalence of apical periodontitis-a dosimetric analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012, 16, 1543–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castagnola, R.; Minciacchi, I.; Rupe, C.; Pesce, A.; Contaldo, M.; Grande, N.M.; Marigo, L.; Lajolo, C. The Outcome of Primary Root Canal Treatment in Post-Irradiated Patients: A Case Series. Proceedings 2019, 35, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035072

AMA Style

Castagnola R, Minciacchi I, Rupe C, Pesce A, Contaldo M, Grande NM, Marigo L, Lajolo C. The Outcome of Primary Root Canal Treatment in Post-Irradiated Patients: A Case Series. Proceedings. 2019; 35(1):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castagnola, Raffaella, Irene Minciacchi, Cosimo Rupe, Adele Pesce, Maria Contaldo, Nicola Maria Grande, Luca Marigo, and Carlo Lajolo. 2019. "The Outcome of Primary Root Canal Treatment in Post-Irradiated Patients: A Case Series" Proceedings 35, no. 1: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop