Quinolones are effective against a broad range of bacterial species and provide potent treatment options for a few infections [1,2]. Quinolones act in a highly unusual mode, and kill bacteria by converting essential enzymes, DNA gyrase or topoisomerase IV, into potent cellular toxins that generate high levels of double-stranded chromosomal breaks. In addition to their effects on the bacterial enzymes, some quinolones display high activity against a variety of eukaryotic type II topoisomerases, including human [3]. The understanding the ability of quinolones to preferentially target the different prokaryotic and eukaryotic type II topoisomerases remains a major challenge for the researchers.
The DFT/B3LYP/6-311 G* level of the basis set has been used for the computation of molecular structures. The score and hydrogen bonds formed with the amino acids from the binding site of the receptor protein are used to predict the binding modes, the binding affinities and the orientation of the docked quinolones. The quinolone compounds were synthesized and characterized by physical–chemical methods and by biological activity.
Some quinolone compounds were designed and synthesized. For these compounds there were calculations performed of characteristics and molecular properties and molecular docking studies to identify and visualize the most likely interaction ligand (quinolone) with the receptor targets, which were imported from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 4P8O, 3M4I, 1ZXM, 2ZD1). The study was performed relating to some quinolone compounds known in medical therapeutics: ciprofloxacin, vosaroxin, elvitegravir. The result of the molecular docking study (docking score), (Figure 1) shows that the nature of the substituents on the quinolone nucleus influences the binding affinity and binding mode of a quinolone to the receptor protein.
Figure 1.
Docking score of quinolone compounds.
The prediction of the binding affinity of a new compound to an identified target is a significant parameter in the development of a new drug and would allow restricted the synthesis to the most promising compounds.
Acknowledgments
This paper has been financed through the NUCLEU Program, which is implemented with the support of ANCSI, project no. PN 19-41 01 02.
References
- Suaifan, A.R.Y.; Mohamed, A.A.M. Fluoroquinolones structural and medicinal developments (2013–2018): Where are we now? Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 3005–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pranger, A.D.; Van Der Werf, T.S.; Kosterink, J.G.W.; Alffenaar, J.W.C. The Role of Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Tuberculosis in 2019. Drugs 2019, 79, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamieson, G.C.; Fox, J.A.; Poi, M.; Strickland, S.A. Molecular and Pharmacologic Properties of the Anticancer Quinolone Derivative Vosaroxin: A New Therapeutic Agent for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Drugs 2016, 76, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
