Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of an All-Solid-State Ammonium Ion–Selective Electrode by a Two-Step Process Using Cyclic Voltammetry
Previous Article in Journal
Microcentrifuge Tubes as Disposable Immunoelectrochemical Cells for the On-Site Determination of GFAP, Biomarker of Hemorrhagic Stroke
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Proceedings
Volume 60
Issue 1
10.3390/IECB2020-07058
proceedings-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Tailoring the Electrochemical and Morphological Properties of Electropolymerized and Dropcast Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate Transducers for Ion-Selective Sensors †

by
Ihda Uswatun Shalihah Shohibuddin
and
Wan Wardatul Amani Wan Salim
*
Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak, Kuala Lumpur 50728, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 2–17 November 2020; Available online: https://iecb2020.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2020, 60(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07058
Published: 2 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fabrication of ion-selective sensors for continuous measurement in fluids depends on understanding the electrochemical and morphological properties of transducers. Electropolymerized nanomaterials essentially offer stable transducers that can reduce measurement drifts. This study aims to elucidate the electrochemical and morphological characteristics of electropolymerized reduced graphene oxide stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate composites on screen-printed carbon electrodes (rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) in 0.1 M potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6) solution. We fabricated the rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs by two different techniques: electropolymerization deposition (EPD) and drop-casting (DC). Results revealed smaller peak-to-peak potential separation (∆Ep) of 360 mV for EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, compared to 510 mV for the DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs. A smaller ∆Ep indicates higher reversibility and faster electron-transfer rate at the electrode-analyte interface. SEM results showed EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs have the roughest surface among electrodes; homogeneous globular structures with diameter range of 1.4–5.3 µm covered the electrode surface. In terms of electrode integrity in fluids, cracks can be seen on the surface of DC PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs after undergoing CV in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6, whereas rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs for both deposition methods maintained their integrity. Globular structures of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS using EPD methods remained after undergoing CV. The results suggest that EPD serves as a potential method to fabricate a stable transducer for ion-selective sensing. This study aims to elucidate performance of nanocomposites via EPD methods, to develop stable ion-selective sensors for physiological and environmental applications.

1. Introduction

Ion-selective sensors have been an attractive choice of sensing technology for clinical, food, and environmental applications owing to sensitive, low-cost, and straightforward fabrication processes, while offering, in addition, the ability to monitor analytes in fluids [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Driven by advancements in nanotechnology, modern ion-selective sensors have evolved from conventional liquid-filled ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) into all-solid-state ISEs (AS-ISEs) that are easier to miniaturize and integrate into sensing platforms [7,8]. However, prolonged use of AS-ISEs in fluids can affect the integrity of sensors and result in measurement drifts. Continuous real-time monitoring is required for various applications encompassing water-quality monitoring [9,10,11], in-vivo measurement for physiological processes [12,13,14,15], and nutrient monitoring in food [16]. Yet, conventional ISEs with inner filling solution are sensitive to evaporation and osmotic pressure, resulting in liquid volume change and hence frequent calibration [17]. Furthermore, handling of solutions requires microfluidics and automation. In this regard, there is a need to develop a robust and stable sensor that can function continuously in fluids with minimal measurement drift and less need for calibration during use. Such minimal drift with high potential stability of AS-ISEs can be achieved using solid-contact materials [18,19].
Previous work reported several techniques to deposit solid-contact materials, such as drop-casting (DC) [20,21], spin coating [22,23], inkjet printing [24,25,26], and electropolymerization deposition (EPD) [27,28]. DC is the simplest, consisting of two easy steps: Casting the materials onto the WEs followed by drying the electrodes. However, transducer materials deposited by drop-casting are relatively thick, lack homogeneity along the WEs, and possess weak adhesion to electrode surfaces. As a result, electrodes modified via drop-casting are not mechanically robust; measurements results can vary between electrodes, so the technique is unsuitable for scaling-up purposes. EPD, however, is a promising method to fabricate robust and stable AS-ISEs owing to stronger molecular interaction between the polymers and the electrode surface, homogeneous thin-film deposition whose thickness can be controlled by changing the number of potential sweep cycles, and the capability to coat nanosize WEs [29]. Electropolymerization of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) in poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) (NaPSS) and lithium perchlorate solution (LiClO4) occurs when electrodes oxidize the EDOT monomers, making the resulting cations combine with themselves, thus producing higher oligomers of electropolymerized poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) [30]. The electropolymerized PEDOT:PSS has been tested for stability of the charge/discharge cycle using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and for its adhesion to electrode surfaces in flowing aqueous media [31].
Besides electropolymerized PEDOT:PSS, several studies have employed electropolymerization of graphene-based nanomaterials and PEDOT as a composite. PEDOT was electropolymerized from an aqueous solution with graphene oxide (GO) as the only charge-compensating counterion. During electropolymerization, GO can be incorporated into the positively charged PEDOT matrix because of the polar hydroxyl and epoxy groups, thus making the GO surface negatively charged. At present, the electropolymerization of rGO-PEDOT:PSS composite has been done with two-step processes, either by doing electropolymerization on the rGO surface [32], or by reducing GO to rGO electrochemically on top of the electropolymerized PEDOT layer [33].
In this study, we employed a one-step electropolymerization of EDOT in a complex electrolyte solution with an aqueous dispersion of reduced graphene oxide. The electropolymerized reduced graphene oxide stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrenesulfonate composite on screen-printed carbon electrodes (rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs) was then electrochemically characterized by cyclic voltammetry measurement. We used reduced graphene oxide stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate (rGO:PSS) to avoid rGO stacking while promoting hydrophilicity of the nanomaterial, allowing rGO:PSS to be dissolved in aqueous solution. In addition to electrochemical characterization, we also performed surface-morphology characterization to investigate the effect of fluids on electrode-surface morphology after CV measurement. A schematic of the experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 1. This study essentially offers a new platform to develop robust and stable AS-ISEs, which are particularly useful for monitoring ion concentrations continuously and in real-time for physiological and environmental applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instrument

Screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs, RRPE1001C) with diameter ø = 2 mm were purchased from Pine Instrument Company, Grove City, PA, USA. A PocketSTATTM was purchased from IVIUM Technologies, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Reduced graphene oxide stabilized with poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (rGO:PSS, 900197), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS, 483095), LiClO4, EDOT, and NaPSS were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. 98% concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 1407-80), and potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6, 6969-00) were purchased from R&M Chemicals, Selangor, Malaysia. Analytical-grade chloride salts of potassium and sodium were procured from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. All chemicals of analytical grade were used as received without further purifications. Deionized water (DI) was used throughout the experiment.

2.2. Fabrication of Drop-Cast and Electropolymerized rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs

SPCEs were activated via cyclic voltammetry for 3 cycles in 0.1 N H2SO4 at potentials of 2.5 V to −2.5 V and scan rate of 100 mV/s. The activated SPCEs were rinsed in DI water and left to dry. To prepare rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, two techniques were used in modifying the working electrode: Drop-casting (DC) and electropolymerization deposition (EPD). For DC, rGO:PSS was mixed with PEDOT:PSS to prepare a rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS composite. To fabricate rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, 3 µl rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS was drop-cast onto the WE of an SPCE. For EPD, the NaPSS, EDOT, and rGO:PSS were dissolved in 0.1 M LiClO4. The galvanostatic technique by applying constant current was used to electropolymerize EDOT and rGO:PSS to rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS. Both DC and EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs were left to dry for 24 h under a laminar flow hood (Esco Micro, ADC—4C1, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia).

2.3. Cyclic Voltammetry of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed for unmodified SPCEs, DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs in 0.1 M potassium ferricyanide, K3Fe(CN)6, over a potential range from −0.5 V to 1.0 V at scan rates of 75, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mV/s. Electrochemical parameters such as peak current (Ip), effective surface area (Ae), and separation of peak-to-peak potential (∆Ep) were analyzed. The Ip obtained from the measurement can be used to calculate the Ae of electrodes using the Randles–Sevcik equation:
              I p = ( 2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3 / 2 D 1 / 2 C A e v 1 / 2
A e = k [ ( 2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3 2 D 1 2 C ]

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs

Surface morphologies of SPCEs, DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs were observed using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT100, JEOL, JAPAN). The electrodes were coated with gold/palladium particles using the Quorum SC7620 Sputter Coater prior to imaging. SEM images were obtained with a power setting of 8.0 kV and magnification of 300×. The average diameter of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS globules was determined using Image J software for n = 15.

3. Results

3.1. Cyclic Voltammetry of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs

CV analysis was performed for bare SPCEs, EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6 to investigate the changes in Ip, Ae, and ∆Ep. We determined the Ip of EPD and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs compared to bare SPCEs by analyzing the difference in anodic peak current (ΔI) between the bare and modified electrodes at a scan rate of 100 mV/s, as shown in Figure 2a. There was a noticeable increase in the Ip of EPD and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs compared to that of bare SPCEs (Ip_Bare = 0.247 mA, Ip_EPD = 0.415 mA, and Ip_DC = 1.045 mA; ΔIEPD-Bare = 0.168 mA, and ΔIDC-Bare = 0.798 mA). The increase in Ip suggests that rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS can facilitate accessibility of the Fe(CN)64/3- redox couple to the electrode surface by improving interfacial electron transfer, thus enhancing the Ip signals. Incorporation of PEDOT:PSS to the rGO increased the electron transport owing to π–π interactions between PEDOT:PSS and rGO. The availability of π-bonding aromatic rings increases and contributes to a larger number of π–π overlaps, leading to more electron delocalization around the aromatic ring and thus improving the electrical conductivity of the modified electrodes [34,35,36]. Note that rGO:PSS is rGO layers stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate, which inhibits rGO stacking while promoting hydrophilicity of the nanomaterial, thus allowing rGO:PSS to be dissolved in aqueous solution [37].
In addition, Ae was also determined by applying the Randles–Sevcik equation. The Ae for bare SPCEs, EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs were 3.1 mm2, 5.7 mm2, and 6.7 mm2, respectively, showing a ~2-fold increase for modified SPCEs compared to bare SPCEs. The increase in Ae of the EPD and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs in comparison to the bare SPCEs could be attributed to the increase in surface-to volume ratio of the nanomaterials, as well as to increase in current density and charge transferability [21].
Further analyses of CV graphs compared the effect of deposition method on separation of peak-to-peak potentials (∆Ep = Epa – Epc) as shown in Figure 2b–d, where lower ∆Ep implies an enhanced electrocatalytic ability of Fe(CN)64/3- at the electrode-analyte interface. We analyzed the ∆Ep of EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs in comparison to DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs. The EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs showed a lower ∆Ep of 360 mV, 1.4 times lower than those of DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs (∆Ep = 510 mV). The lower ∆Ep suggests higher reversibility and faster electron transfer at the electrode–analyte interface; thus, the diffusion of analyte to the electrode surface is a dominant contributor to the peak potential [38]. The structure of PEDOT:PSS and rGO:PSS composites formed from the EPD process could potentially assist the electron transfer between electrode surface and analyte, making the nanocomposite suitable for ion-selective sensing.

3.2. Surface Morphology of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs

The surface morphology of SPCEs modified with EPD and DC of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS was characterized under SEM. SEM images were taken after all electrodes were run through CV. The morphology could provide an insight on the effect of fluids on the nanocomposite after undergoing CV, as CV is a consumptive process that can affect morphology of nanomaterial transducers. Figure 3 shows the surface morphology of bare SPCEs, PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs. Bare SPCEs display a rough and flaky-like morphology (Figure 3a), PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs appear smooth with some bumps, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs resemble PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs (Figure 3b) but with the appearance of tiny grains on the electrode surface (Figure 3c). EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs have the roughest surface and homogeneous globular structures can be seen to cover the electrode surface (Figure 3d). Detailed analysis using Image J software revealed that the globule diameters are in the range of 1.4–5.3 µm. In terms of electrode integrity in fluids, in this case after electrodes had undergone CV in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6, cracks can be seen on DC PEDOT:PSS/SPCE surfaces (Figure 3b), whereas rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs for both deposition methods of DC (Figure 3c) and EPD (Figure 3d) maintained their integrity. The results suggest that PEDOT:PSS alone can become brittle with prolonged measurement and storage in fluids. In PEDOT:PSS layers, PEDOT is surrounded by a PSS network that attracts a considerable amount of water, allowing transport and penetration of ions into the PEDOT layers. Ion transport, and subsequently electrochemical activity, become possible with such hydrated pathways. This, however, brings a challenge to maintain layer integrity since the layers are exposed to aqueous environment such as biological fluids for in-vivo applications and flowing water for environment applications [39]. In this regard, incorporation of rGO:PSS into PEDOT:PSS as a composite can improve the mechanical strength of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS when electrodes undergo CV measurements. The results are consistent with previous studies that found that PEDOT:PSS/graphene nanocomposite [40] and PEDOT:PSS/carboxylic group functionalized graphene composite [41] are stable in aqueous media owing to the properties of graphene derivatives, which improve flexibility, enhance adhesion, and increase mechanical strength of the composite.
In addition, globular structures of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS using EPD methods remained after undergoing CV, indicating a robust and stable transducer in fluids. Besides morphological properties, the CV of EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS have shown smaller ∆Ep, which implies higher reversibility and faster electron transfer at the electrode-analyte interface. Tailoring the morphological and electrochemical properties of the EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, we can conclude that rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS via EPD can be a potential technique to fabricate a robust transducer for ion-selective sensing in biological and environmental fluids. Similar results were observed in previous work, where PEDOT:PSS drop-casting techniques produced smoother images when the electrodes were soaked in PBS; however, globular structures remained for electropolymerized PEDOT:PSS [31].

4. Conclusions

We compared CV and surface morphology of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs by two different techniques: electropolymerization deposition (EPD) and drop-casting (DC). Higher peak current (Ip) was observed for nanocomposite-modified SPCEs with Ip_EPD = 0.415 mA and Ip_DC = 1.045 mA, compared to bare SPCEs with Ip_Bare = 0.247 mA. The results indicate that the nanocomposite improves the conductivity of the working electrodes (WEs). Larger effective surface area (Ae) was also observed for nanocomposite-modified SPCEs with Ae_EPD = 5.7 mm2 and Ae_DC = 6.7 mm2, showing a ~2-fold increase compared to bare SPCEs with Ae_Bare = 3.1 mm2. In addition, we analyzed the effect of deposition method on the electrochemical properties of the composite. Electropolymerized rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs showed a smaller peak-to-peak potential separation (∆Ep) of 360 mV compared to the drop-cast rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs (510 mV). The smaller ∆Ep of electropolymerized rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS suggests higher reversibility and faster electron transfer at the electrode-analyte interface. SEM results showed that bare SPCEs display a rough and flaky-like morphology, PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs appear smooth with some bumps, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs resemble PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs but with the appearance of tiny grains on the electrode surface. The roughest surface is EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, where a homogeneous globular structure can be seen to cover the electrode surface. Detailed analysis using Image J software revealed that the globule diameters are in the range of 1.4–5.3 µm. In terms of electrode integrity in fluids, in this case after electrodes underwent CV in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6, cracks can be seen on DC PEDOT:PSS/SPCE surfaces, whereas rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs for both deposition methods of DC and EPD maintained their integrity. The results suggest that PEDOT:PSS alone can become brittle with prolonged measurement and storage in fluids. Incorporation of rGO:PSS into PEDOT:PSS as a composite improves the mechanical strength of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS when electrodes undergo CV measurements. Globular structures of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS using EPD methods remained after undergoing CV. The results suggest that EPD serves as a potential method to fabricate a stable transducer for ion-selective sensing. Future work includes investigating the effect of ion-selective membranes on EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs and testing the fabricated sensors for continuous monitoring in fluids. This study essentially offers a scalable platform to develop robust and stable ion-selective sensors, which are particularly useful for monitoring ion concentrations continuously in real-time for physiological and environmental applications.

Funding

This research was funded by nanoSkunkWorkX Sdn. Bhd.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Abdelmohsen Benoudjit, Piravin Raj Barthasarathy, and other members of Amani Research Group (ARG) for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Potentiometric ion sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bakker, E.; Bühlmann, P.; Pretsch, E. Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. 1. General characteristics. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3083–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bakker, E. Ion-selective electrodes, Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 3rd ed.; Worsfold, P., Poole, C., Townshend, A., Miró, M., Eds.; Elsevier Ltd.: Radarweg, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 231–251. [Google Scholar]
  4. Urbanowicz, M.; Jasiński, A.; Jasińska, M.; Drucis, K.; Ekman, M.; Szarmach, A.; Bocheńska, M. Simultaneous determination of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Cl− in unstimulated and stimulated human saliva using all solid state multisensor platform. Electroanalysis 2017, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Piek, M.; Wojciechowska, A.; Fendrych, K.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-bator, B. A simple way to modify selectivity of sodium sensitive electrodes by using organic conductive crystals. Ionics (Kiel) 2018, 25, 2311–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tahirbegi, I.B.; Alvira, M.; Mir, M.; Samitier, J. Simple and fast method for fabrication of endoscopic implantable sensor arrays. Sensors 2014, 14, 11416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Catrall, R.W.; Freiser, H. Coated wire ion selective electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1971, 43, 1905–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Marco, R.; Veder, J.P.; Clarke, G.; Nelson, A.; Prince, K.; Pretsch, E.; Bakker, E. Evidence of a water layer in solid-contact polymeric ion sensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Xu, Z.; Hughes, E.; Qian, F.; Lee, M.; Li, B. Real-time in situ monitoring of nitrogen dynamics in wastewater treatment processes using wireless, solid-state, and ion-selective membrane sensors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3140–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choosang, J.; Numnuam, A.; Thavarungkul, P.; Kanatharana, P.; Radu, T.; Ullah, S.; Radu, A. Simultaneous detection of ammonium and nitrate in environmental samples using on ion-selective electrode and comparison with portable colorimetric assays. Sensors 2018, 18, 3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Athavale, R.; Dinkel, C.; Wehrli, B.; Bakker, E.; Crespo, G.A.; Brand, A. Robust solid-contact ion selective electrodes for high-resolution in situ measurements in fresh water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cánovas, R.; Sánchez, S.P.; Parrilla, M.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G.A. Cytotoxicity study of ionophore-based membranes: Toward on-body and in vivo ion sensing. ACS Sensors 2019, 4, 2524–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, J.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Pan, L.; Lin, P.; Zhang, B.; Fei, F. A sensitive and specific nanosensor for monitoring extracellular potassium levels in the brain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, Y.A.; Melik, R.; Rabie, A.N.; Ibrahim, A.M.; Moses, D.; Tan, A.; Lin, S.J. Electrochemical activation and inhibition of neuromuscular systems through modulation of ion concentrations with ion-selective membranes. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, W.; Zheng, W.; Mao, L. In vivo measurement of calcium ion with solid-state ion-selective electrode by using shelled hollow carbon nanospheres as transducing layer. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 4421–4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sundramoorthy, A.K.; Premkumar, B.S.; Gunasekaran, S. Reduced graphene oxide-poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrenesulfonate based dual-selective sensor for iron in different oxidation states. ACS Sensors 2016, 1, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, J.; Stein, A.; Bühlmann, P. Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes. Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 76, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mendecki, L.; Mirica, K.A. Conductive metal-organic frameworks as ion-to-electron transducers in potentiometric sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19248–19257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Criscuolo, F.; Taurino, I.; Stradolini, F.; Carrara, S.; de Micheli, G. Highly-stable Li+ion-selective electrodes based on noble metal nanostructured layers as solid-contacts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1027, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pirovano, P.; Dorrian, M.; Shinde, A.; Donohoe, A.; Brady, A.J.; Moyna, N.M.; McCaul, M. A wearable sensor for the detection of sodium and potassium in human sweat during exercise. Talanta 2020, 219, 121145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abd-wahab, F.; Farhana, H.; Guthoos, A.; Salim, W.W.A. Solid-state characterization of rGO-PEDOT:PSS transducing material for enzymatic sensing. Biosensors 2019, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salim, W.W.A.W.; Zeitchek, M.A.; Hermann, A.C.; Ricco, A.J.; Tan, M.; Selch, F.; Porterfield, D.M. Multi-analyte biochip (MAB) based on all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes (ASSISE) for physiological research. J. Vis. Exp. 2013, 74, 50020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, T.; Mattinen, U.; Bobacka, J. Improving the sensitivity of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes by using coulometric signal transduction. ACS Sensors 2019, 4, 900–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. He, Q.; Das, S.R.; Garland, N.T.; Jing, D.; Hondred, J.A.; Cargill, A.A.; Claussen, J.C. Enabling inkjet printed graphene for ion selective electrodes with postprint thermal annealing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12719–12727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiang, H.; Yu, W.; Waimin, J.F.; Glassmaker, N.; Raghunathan, N.; Jiang, X.; Rahimi, R. Inkjet-printed solid-state potentiometric nitrate ion selective electrodes for agricultural application. IEEE Sens. 2019, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pol, R.; Moya, A.; Gabriel, G.; Gabriel, D.; Céspedes, F.; Baeza, M. Inkjet-printed sulfide-selective electrode. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 12231–12236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Benoudjit, A.; Shohibuddin, I.U.S.; Salim, W.W.A.W. Comparative study of cyclic voltammetry and cycle stability of electropolymerized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) on screen-printed electrodes in aqueous media. TEST Eng. Manag. 2020, 83, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindfors, T.; Boeva, Z.A.; Latonen, R.M. Electrochemical synthesis of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in aqueous dispersion of high porosity reduced graphene oxide. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 25279–25286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, T.; Yin, H.; Gao, L.H.; Wang, K.Z.; Yan, D. Recent advances in electrodes modified with ruthenium complexes for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water oxidation. In Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, 1st ed.; van Eldik, R., Hubbard, C., Eds.; Academic Press: Hampshire Street, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 74, pp. 305–341. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, X.; Kirsch, J.; Olsen, E.V.; Fergus, J.W.; Simonian, A.L. Anti-fouling PEDOT:PSS modification on glassy carbon electrodes for continuous monitoring of tricresyl phosphate. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Benoudjit, A.; Bader, M.M.; Salim, W.W.A.W. Study of electropolymerized PEDOT:PSS transducers for application as electrochemical sensors in aqueous media. Sens. Bio Sensing Res. 2018, 17, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, F.; Yao, Z.; Yue, R.; Du, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, P.; Wang, C. Electrochemical fabrication of long-term stable Pt-loaded PEDOT/graphene composites for ethanol electrooxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 14085–14093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Foronda, J.R.F.; Cabrera, S.M.R.; Cumpas, D.L.; Villar, P.G.A.; Tan, J.L.; Tongol, B.J.V. Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Pt particles supported on reduced graphene oxide/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) RGO/PEDOT composite towards ethanol oxidation. J. Chem. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cui, L.; Gao, J.; Xu, T.; Zhao, Y.; Qu, L. Polymer/graphene hybrids for advanced energy-conversion and -storage materials. Chem. An Asian J. 2016, 11, 1151–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kertesz, M. Pancake bonding: An unusual pi-stacking interaction. Chem. A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.L.; Chiang, J.Y.; Chou, H.T.; Fu, C.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Chang, H.Y. Toxicity analysis of poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) coated graphene on HMEC-1 cells under dynamic conditions mimicking blood flow. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 51910–51918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Graham, D.J. Standard Operating Procedures for Cyclic Voltammetry, 1st ed.; LULU Press: Morrisville, NC, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-387-51430-4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Elmahmoudy, M.; Inal, S.; Charrier, A.; Uguz, I.; Malliaras, G.G.; Sanaur, S. Tailoring the electrochemical and mechanical properties of PEDOT:PSS films for bioelectronics. Wiley 2018, 1404, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, D.; Rahman, M.M.; Ge, C.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.J. Highly stable and conductive PEDOT:PSS/graphene nanocomposites for biosensor applications in aqueous medium. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 15458–15465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wen, Y.; Song, H.; Zhu, D. Facile preparation of highly water-stable and flexible PEDOT:PSS organic/inorganic composite materials and their application in electrochemical sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2014, 196, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Proceedings 60 00011 g001 550
Figure 1. All-solid-state ion-selective sensors. (a) Schematic of all-solid-state ion-selective sensors for continuous monitoring in fluids. A: Sample fluid, B: Screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), C: Connector between electrode and pocketSTATTM, D: pocketSTATTM, E: IVIUM software. Deposition of reduced graphene oxide stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate composite on screen-printed carbon electrodes (rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs) by (b) drop-casting (DC) and (c) electropolymerization deposition (EPD) techniques. B1: Expanded view of SPCEs showing the working electrode (WE).
Figure 1. All-solid-state ion-selective sensors. (a) Schematic of all-solid-state ion-selective sensors for continuous monitoring in fluids. A: Sample fluid, B: Screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), C: Connector between electrode and pocketSTATTM, D: pocketSTATTM, E: IVIUM software. Deposition of reduced graphene oxide stabilized in polystyrenesulfonate and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate composite on screen-printed carbon electrodes (rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs) by (b) drop-casting (DC) and (c) electropolymerization deposition (EPD) techniques. B1: Expanded view of SPCEs showing the working electrode (WE).
Proceedings 60 00011 g001
Proceedings 60 00011 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements of bare SPCEs, EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs at a scan rate of 100 mV/s in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6. ∆Ip is shown. CV measurements of (b) SPCEs, (c) DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and (d) EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs at scan rates of 75, 100, 150, 200, 250 mV/s in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6. ∆Ep is shown.
Figure 2. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements of bare SPCEs, EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs at a scan rate of 100 mV/s in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6. ∆Ip is shown. CV measurements of (b) SPCEs, (c) DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and (d) EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs at scan rates of 75, 100, 150, 200, 250 mV/s in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6. ∆Ep is shown.
Proceedings 60 00011 g002
Proceedings 60 00011 g003 550
Figure 3. Surface morphology of (a) bare SPCEs, (b) PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, (c) DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and (d) EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs. Bare SPCEs display a rough and flaky-like morphology, PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs appear smooth with some bumps, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs resemble PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs but with the appearance of tiny grains on the electrode surface. The roughest surface is EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs where a homogeneous globular structure can be seen to cover the electrode surface. Detailed analysis using Image J software revealed that the globule diameters are in the range of 1.4–5.3 µm. In terms of electrode integrity in fluids, in this case after electrodes underwent CV in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6, cracks can be seen on DC PEDOT:PSS/SPCE surfaces, whereas rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs for both deposition methods of DC and EPD maintained their integrity. The results suggest that PEDOT:PSS alone can become brittle with prolonged measurement and storage in fluid. Incorporation of rGO:PSS into PEDOT:PSS as a composite improves the mechanical strength of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS when electrodes undergo CV measurements.
Figure 3. Surface morphology of (a) bare SPCEs, (b) PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, (c) DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs, and (d) EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs. Bare SPCEs display a rough and flaky-like morphology, PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs appear smooth with some bumps, and DC rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs resemble PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs but with the appearance of tiny grains on the electrode surface. The roughest surface is EPD rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs where a homogeneous globular structure can be seen to cover the electrode surface. Detailed analysis using Image J software revealed that the globule diameters are in the range of 1.4–5.3 µm. In terms of electrode integrity in fluids, in this case after electrodes underwent CV in 0.1 M K3Fe(CN)6, cracks can be seen on DC PEDOT:PSS/SPCE surfaces, whereas rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS/SPCEs for both deposition methods of DC and EPD maintained their integrity. The results suggest that PEDOT:PSS alone can become brittle with prolonged measurement and storage in fluid. Incorporation of rGO:PSS into PEDOT:PSS as a composite improves the mechanical strength of rGO:PSS-PEDOT:PSS when electrodes undergo CV measurements.
Proceedings 60 00011 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shohibuddin, I.U.S.; Salim, W.W.A.W. Tailoring the Electrochemical and Morphological Properties of Electropolymerized and Dropcast Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate Transducers for Ion-Selective Sensors. Proceedings 2020, 60, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07058

AMA Style

Shohibuddin IUS, Salim WWAW. Tailoring the Electrochemical and Morphological Properties of Electropolymerized and Dropcast Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate Transducers for Ion-Selective Sensors. Proceedings. 2020; 60(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shohibuddin, Ihda Uswatun Shalihah, and Wan Wardatul Amani Wan Salim. 2020. "Tailoring the Electrochemical and Morphological Properties of Electropolymerized and Dropcast Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate Transducers for Ion-Selective Sensors" Proceedings 60, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07058

APA Style

Shohibuddin, I. U. S., & Salim, W. W. A. W. (2020). Tailoring the Electrochemical and Morphological Properties of Electropolymerized and Dropcast Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate Transducers for Ion-Selective Sensors. Proceedings, 60(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07058

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop