Next Article in Journal
Rapeseed Post-Frying Oil from Fish Fillets as a Carbon Source in Microbial Oil Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Valorisation of Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge through Thermal Gasification: An Economic Perspective
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Proceedings
Volume 77
Issue 1
10.3390/proceedings2021077001
proceedings-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Elena Savoia
1,*,
Alberto Montrond
1 and
Anna Ekström
2
1
Community Safety Branch, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), SE-651 81 Karlstad, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the Global Safety Evaluation Workshop, Online, 1 July–31 December 2020.
Proceedings 2021, 77(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077001
Published: 7 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Global Safety Evaluation (GSE) Network Workshop)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: open
  • Conference submission management system: N/A
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 23
  • Number of submissions accepted: 23
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 100% (submissions by invitation only)
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 2
  • Any additional information on the review process: Submissions were by invitation after identifying relevant researchers and practitioners in the specific area of work. Researchers were pre-identified and selected to present an abstract and lecture.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Savoia, E.; Montrond, A.; Ekström, A. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2021, 77, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077001

AMA Style

Savoia E, Montrond A, Ekström A. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2021; 77(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Savoia, Elena, Alberto Montrond, and Anna Ekström. 2021. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 77, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077001

APA Style

Savoia, E., Montrond, A., & Ekström, A. (2021). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 77(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop