Next Article in Journal
Can We Use Extracellular Water to Total Body Water Ratio as a Predictor of the Nutritional Status of Patients with Colorectal Cancer at the Time of Diagnosis?
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Its Interaction with Genetic Susceptibility to Obesity on Adiposity in European Children: The IDEFICS/I.Family Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

NUTRALYS® Pea Protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus: A Range of High Nutritional Quality Pea Proteins with Characteristic Digestion Profiles †

by
Laetitia Guérin-Deremaux
1,
Caroline Perreau
1,*,
Catherine Lefranc-Millot
2 and
Saskia De Jong
3
1
ROQUETTE, 62080 Lestrem, France
2
ROQUETTE, 59110 La Madeleine, France
3
NIZO, 6718 Ede, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091289
Published: 6 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
The objectives of the present research were to investigate (1) the nutritional quality through the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS); (2) the apparent viscosity under simulated in vitro gastric conditions of two pea protein isolates named NUTRALYS® pea protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus. In the first study, the in vivo protein digestibility was measured according to the methodology recommended by the FAO/WHO in 1991. Growing rats were fed a diet containing 10% proteins or a protein-free diet during a minimum of a 5-day balance period with daily collection of faeces. The true digestibility was measured using the rats’ nitrogen intake and fecal nitrogen. PDCAAS was calculated using the amino acid profile and the protein digestibility. In the second study, in vitro gastric digestion was simulated using the NIZO SIMPHYD model. The profiles of “fast-” or “slow-digested” proteins were evaluated and compared to whey and casein proteins by measuring the evolution of the viscosity in these conditions. Both of the tested proteins displayed a balanced amino acid profile with high concentrations of arginine, branched-chain amino acids, lysine and glutamic acid. The true protein digestibility of NUTRALYS® pea protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus were 97% ± 2 and 96% ± 3, respectively. According to the FAO/WHO requirement profile (2007) mainly used in Europe for adults or the profile from 1991 mainly used in the United States for all age groups except infants, the PDCAAS results of NUTRALYS® pea protein were 93 and 81, respectively. The PDCAAS scores of NUTRALYS® S85 Plus were 92 and 81, respectively (Study 1). The digestion of NUTRALYS® pea protein resulted in a clear increase in viscosity during the gastric acidification and a sudden drop in viscosity after the addition of the gastric enzymes. The viscosity profile of NUTRALYS® S85 Plus did not change during digestion (Study 2). The range of pea proteins evaluated in these studies displayed a high nutritional quality profile. NUTRALYS® pea protein is an “intermediate-fast protein” and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus is a “fast-digested protein”, meaning that these ingredients can be adapted to specific nutritional needs. These results show that plant-based proteins, like those of the NUTRALYS® range, may allow us to design high-quality protein.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G.-D. and S.D.J.; methodology, L.G.-D., C.P. and S.D.J.; software, S.D.J.; validation, C.P. and S.D.J.; formal analysis, C.P. and S.D.J.; investigation, C.P. and S.D.J.; resources, C.P. and S.D.J.; data curation, C.P. and S.D.J.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G.-D. and S.D.J.; writing—review and editing, L.G.-D., S.D.J., C.L.-M. and C.P.; visualization, S.D.J. and C.P.; supervision, S.D.J.; project administration, L.G.-D.; funding acquisition, L.G.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Roquette.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of animal experimentation of Nord–Pas de Calais CEEA 75 (00619.03 and 12/08/2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions (privacy, legal and ethical reasons).

Conflicts of Interest

Catherine Lefranc-Millot, Laetitia Guerin-Deremaux and Caroline Perreau are employees of ROQUETTE FRERES, that provided financial support for this research.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guérin-Deremaux, L.; Perreau, C.; Lefranc-Millot, C.; De Jong, S. NUTRALYS® Pea Protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus: A Range of High Nutritional Quality Pea Proteins with Characteristic Digestion Profiles. Proceedings 2023, 91, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091289

AMA Style

Guérin-Deremaux L, Perreau C, Lefranc-Millot C, De Jong S. NUTRALYS® Pea Protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus: A Range of High Nutritional Quality Pea Proteins with Characteristic Digestion Profiles. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):289. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia, Caroline Perreau, Catherine Lefranc-Millot, and Saskia De Jong. 2023. "NUTRALYS® Pea Protein and NUTRALYS® S85 Plus: A Range of High Nutritional Quality Pea Proteins with Characteristic Digestion Profiles" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091289

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop