Next Article in Journal
Supporting the Development of Rural Areas with Experiential Learning about Embedded Food Systems—GOODFOOD Project
Previous Article in Journal
Resources, Opportunities and Limits of Data and Open Source Tools Used in Preventive Archaeology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Validation and Reproducibility of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool—MyFood24—In a Danish Population: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study †

by
Sadime Basak Kisi
1,*,
Sidse Ida Ingemann Rasmussen
1,
Caroline Filskov Petersen
1,
Mette Friberg Hitz
2 and
Inge Tetens
1
1
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Copenhagen, Denmark
2
National Research Center for Bone Health, Zealand University Hospital (ZUH), 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091399
Published: 8 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
Background: The validation and reproducibility assessment of dietary assessment tools are needed in order to assess the precision and accuracy of the methods applied when estimating habitual intake. Using objective biomarkers in these validation studies is a further strength. Earlier validation studies showed high rates of underestimation of dietary energy intake. Myfood24 is an online tool that was developed in 2015 in the UK with the aim of being able to cover the need for high-quality dietary assessment instruments with a high validity and reliability for all ages, and it has already been validated in settings consisting of British and German adults, but not in a Danish population. Objective: To assess the validity and reproducibility of a self-administered 7-day web-based dietary assessment tool, Myfood24®, among healthy Danish adults regarding objective biomarkers, and to assure the quality of a self-administered web-based dietary recall tool as a valid dietary assessment method for internal use. Methods: A cross-sectional study with repeated measurements is being conducted with healthy adults from both sexes. Participants are asked to complete a self-administered web-based 7-day 24 h dietary recall tool (Myfood24®) at baseline and 4 weeks after (±1 weeks). The validity of this tool will be assessed by comparing the estimated mean dietary intake obtained by the tool with reference measures of energy metabolism and objective biomarkers of intake of selected nutrients: measurements of the concentration of urea, creatinine, and potassium analyzed in a 24 h urine sample, as well as folic acid in fasting blood plasma samples as a biomarker of intake of fruit and vegetables. The estimated dietary intake of energy will be compared with resting energy expenditure (REE) measured by means of indirect calorimetry and multiplied by a PAL value obtained from the IPAQ-International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Reproducibility will be assessed by means of comparison of the results of two 7-day web-based dietary assessments obtained by Myfood24®, 4 weeks apart. Preliminary results: Among 164 interested subjects, a total of 67 were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. At the time of writing, 35 subjects (9M/26 F) have completed the first visit of the study, while 97 subjects have been excluded. Of the included subjects, 24 have finished the second dietary recording and finished their participation after a final meeting with a dietician. The trial will end in September 2023. The baseline characteristics (mean ± SD) are as follows: age, 55.2 ± 10 years; height, 1.69 ± 0.09 m; body weight, 74.4 ± 10.6 kg; and BMI, 25.8 ± 2.4. REE was 1427 ± 201 kcal. Discussion: The recruitment is still ongoing. More results will be ready to be presented at the FENS conference.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, design and methodology: I.T. and S.B.K.; Investigation: S.B.K., S.I.I.R. and C.F.P.; Resources: I.T. and M.F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This project was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee, Capital Region, Protocol notification number: 91474. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05600530).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kisi, S.B.; Rasmussen, S.I.I.; Petersen, C.F.; Hitz, M.F.; Tetens, I. Validation and Reproducibility of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool—MyFood24—In a Danish Population: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study. Proceedings 2023, 91, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091399

AMA Style

Kisi SB, Rasmussen SII, Petersen CF, Hitz MF, Tetens I. Validation and Reproducibility of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool—MyFood24—In a Danish Population: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):399. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kisi, Sadime Basak, Sidse Ida Ingemann Rasmussen, Caroline Filskov Petersen, Mette Friberg Hitz, and Inge Tetens. 2023. "Validation and Reproducibility of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool—MyFood24—In a Danish Population: A Cross-Sectional Validation Study" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091399

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop