Next Article in Journal
Systematic Experimental Evaluation of Submilliwatt PV Cells for Indoor Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Printed PEDOT:PSS Sensing Labels for Real-Time Monitoring of Hydrogen Peroxide Vapors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Room Temperature CO2 Detection by Metal Oxide-Based Nanosensors †

1
Nanosensors and Intelligent System Group, Institute of Physics Technology and Information (ITEFI-CSIC), Serrano 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain
2
Physics Faculty, University of Barcelona, Martí i Franquès, 1, 11, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097146
Published: 3 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference)

Abstract

:
Carbon dioxide is considered a greenhouse gas and is the main cause of global warming. CO2 emissions have increased more and more each year. It is therefore important to be able to detect these levels of CO2 at room temperature. Chemical sensors consisting of FR-4 substrates with four membranes on which Fe2O3, SnO2, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles have been deposited, were used in this experiment. The method used to create the sensors was the drop-casting technique. Two types of experiments were performed using these sensors, with each measurement considering a relative humidity value of either 0% or 50% in air. Based on the results, we have observed a significant improvement in detection for measurements with humidity. These sensors can detect concentration as low as 250 ppm with 50% humidity, compared to 700 ppm without humidity in air.

1. Introduction

Humans emit large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) mainly by burning fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil for energy production, transportation, as well as for industrial processes. The increase in these CO2 emissions causes the sun’s heat to be trapped in the atmosphere, leading to the climate crisis.
The current outdoor concentration of CO2 is around 400 ppm, but indoor concentrations can rise to between 2000 and 3000 ppm. Moreover, although this gas is not as harmful to humans as carbon monoxide (CO), levels of CO2 between 800 and 2000 ppm can cause headaches, tiredness, and loss of concentration.
Performing this experiment using rapid and low-cost techniques allows for the development of fast and economical sensors. The FR-4 substrates and compounds used are very affordable in terms of cost. Thanks to the UV led activation, these sensors do not require heating methods, therefore they can be easily used at room temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

The starting material was nanoparticles of Tin(IV) oxide with particle size below 100 nm, and Zinc oxide, Iron(III) oxide, and Copper(II) oxide with particle size below 50 nm, all supplied by Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The sensitive layers were formed creating dispersions of the metal oxide NPs, which were prepared in deionized water at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. They were deposited by drop-casting [1] on FR-4 substrates with interdigitated electrodes.

3. Discussion

In this project, the best responses were achieved with the SnO2 and ZnO sensors, whereas the responses were poor when using Fe2O3 and CuO oxides. As shown in Figure 1, the response was significantly better in humid air, with a response almost twice as good as that obtained in dry air.
In this experiment, measurements were conducted to detect other gases such as CO or methane, but the best sensitivity values were obtained for CO2 gas.
The sensor response is calculated as the relative resistance change between the resistance measured in air ( R a i r ) and the resistance measured when the gas is present ( R C O 2 ).
r = R a i r R C O 2 R a i r × 100

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, I.S. and J.P.S.; validation, I.S. and J.P.S.; formal analysis, J.G.; investigation, I.S. and J.G.; resources, I.S.; data curation J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, I.S., J.G. and J.P.S.; visualization, I.S. and J.G.; supervision, I.S. and J.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities for supporting their research under the Smart-AirQ project (TED2021-131114B-C22) founded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by European Union “NextGenerationEU”/PRTR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Santos, J.; Sanchez-Vicente, C.; Azabal, A.; Ruiz-Valdepenas, S.; Lozano, J.; Sayago, I.; Sanjurjo, J. Automation and optimization device for the fabrication of sensors with nanomaterials. In Proceedings of the 2021 13th Spanish Conference on Electron Devices (CDE), Sevilla, Spain, 9–11 June 2021; pp. 129–131. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Response curves of the SnO2 and ZnO sensors to different CO2 concentrations at room temperature: (a) response curves in dry air (without humidity); (b) response curves in wet air (with 50% humidity).
Figure 1. Response curves of the SnO2 and ZnO sensors to different CO2 concentrations at room temperature: (a) response curves in dry air (without humidity); (b) response curves in wet air (with 50% humidity).
Proceedings 97 00146 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, J.P.; Sayago, I.; González, J. Room Temperature CO2 Detection by Metal Oxide-Based Nanosensors. Proceedings 2024, 97, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097146

AMA Style

Santos JP, Sayago I, González J. Room Temperature CO2 Detection by Metal Oxide-Based Nanosensors. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, José Pedro, Isabel Sayago, and Júlia González. 2024. "Room Temperature CO2 Detection by Metal Oxide-Based Nanosensors" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097146

APA Style

Santos, J. P., Sayago, I., & González, J. (2024). Room Temperature CO2 Detection by Metal Oxide-Based Nanosensors. Proceedings, 97(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097146

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop