Next Article in Journal
TinyML with Meta-Learning on Microcontrollers for Air Pollution Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
Sensor Protection Caps: Development Aspects and Verification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Freeform Optimization of an Ultrasonic Horn Coupled to an Airborne MEMS Transducer †

by
Gabriele Bosetti
*,
Stefan Hofstetter-Spona
and
Gabriele Schrag
Chair of Physics of Electrotechnology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097151
Published: 8 April 2024

Abstract

:
We designed an ultrasonic horn using a physics-based freeform optimization method to achieve the target frequency response of an airborne ultrasonic MEMS transducer operating in transmitting mode. The radial profile of the ultrasonic horn was parametrized using a Bezier curve, and its shape was optimized using a genetic algorithm. A computationally fast compact model of the full system, wherein the horn was described analytically using transmission line theory, was used to calculate the frequency response of the transducer and evaluate the optimization objective. The result shows very good agreement with the experimental measurement of a realized prototype.

1. Introduction

MEMS-based airborne ultrasonic systems have gained popularity due to their compactness, low power consumption, and low-cost applications in ranging and gesture recognition. It is well known that the coupling between the device and the acoustic surroundings defined by the package has a significant impact on the dynamic behavior of membrane-based ultrasonic transducers [1]. Figure 1a shows dynamic measurements of an electrically actuated piezoelectric membrane attached to a cylindrical horn. One can recognize that the transducer, air, and horn form a coupled oscillator system whose resonances define the optimal operating frequencies of the ultrasonic system. Hence, a specifically designed horn shape enables us to tailor the system frequency response to a specific target response.

2. Methods

As a first step, the radial profile of the horn is parametrized by Bezier curves, which provide a flexible yet controllable description of the geometry and allow for the definition of a freeform and continuous radial profile by introducing a limited number of control points (Figure 1b). Moreover, this mathematical framework enables a clear definition of the start and end points of the curve, which is necessary to match the throat radius of the horn to the etched cavity of the chip and to set a defined mouth radius. In the presented example, we define control points, which are equally spaced over the length of the horn; the more control points, the more complex the geometries. In this work, the goal is to find a horn geometry which tunes the system response to exhibit two resonance peaks at 29 kHz and 41 kHz. A genetic algorithm is employed to search for the optimal freeform control points, which are used to calculate the new horn geometry at each evaluation step. The optimization goal, i.e., the desired displacement frequency response, is evaluated for each horn geometry by applying an analytical, physics-based compact model, where the input acoustic impedance of the horn Zin,TL is determined by a discretization approach based on transmission line theory [2]. The optimal design is extracted by minimizing the error between the simulated and the target resonance frequencies. The full-analytical nature of the whole optimization loop ensures very fast computation times and consistent convergence.

3. Discussion

Because of the exotic nature of the shape of the optimized horn (see Figure 1b), we checked the agreement between the input acoustic impedance calculated by the compact models with FEM simulations (see Figure 2a). Figure 2b shows the displacement response of the optimized and analytically predicted system design. It meets the target values very well, which is also confirmed by measurements of a prototype. The exceptional results of this study demonstrate the feasibility and predictive power of the presented optimization method and, therefore, lay the foundation towards tailoring the frequency response of airborne MEMS transducers by ultrasonic horns.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, G.B. and S.H.-S.; investigation, S.H.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, G.B. and G.S.; supervision, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Christian Bretthauer from Infineon Technologies AG for providing the MEMS devices used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bosetti, G.; Hofstetter-Spona, S.; Schrag, G. On the Use of 3D-Printed Ultrasonic Horns to Tune the Frequency Response of Airborne Mems Transducers. In Proceedings of the Transducers Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 25–29 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosetti, G.; Schrag, G. Efficient Modeling of Acoustic Channels—Towards Tailored Frequency Response of Airborne Ultrasonic MEMS Transducers. In Proceedings of the EuroSimE Conference, St. Julian, Malta, 25–27 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Laser Doppler vibrometer measurements of the center displacement of the transducer under electrical actuation in vacuum and in air when attached to a cylindrical ultrasonic horn. (b) Freeform modeling of the ultrasonic channel. The radial profile is described with Bezier curves.
Figure 1. (a) Laser Doppler vibrometer measurements of the center displacement of the transducer under electrical actuation in vacuum and in air when attached to a cylindrical ultrasonic horn. (b) Freeform modeling of the ultrasonic channel. The radial profile is described with Bezier curves.
Proceedings 97 00151 g001
Figure 2. (a) Input acoustic impedance of the ultrasonic horn: comparison between analytical calculation and FEM results. (b) System response of the optimized ultrasonic system. Comparison between compact model and measurements.
Figure 2. (a) Input acoustic impedance of the ultrasonic horn: comparison between analytical calculation and FEM results. (b) System response of the optimized ultrasonic system. Comparison between compact model and measurements.
Proceedings 97 00151 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bosetti, G.; Hofstetter-Spona, S.; Schrag, G. Freeform Optimization of an Ultrasonic Horn Coupled to an Airborne MEMS Transducer. Proceedings 2024, 97, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097151

AMA Style

Bosetti G, Hofstetter-Spona S, Schrag G. Freeform Optimization of an Ultrasonic Horn Coupled to an Airborne MEMS Transducer. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bosetti, Gabriele, Stefan Hofstetter-Spona, and Gabriele Schrag. 2024. "Freeform Optimization of an Ultrasonic Horn Coupled to an Airborne MEMS Transducer" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097151

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop