Next Article in Journal
A Simple Method for Extracting Piezoelectric Coefficient d31 by Fitting Experimental Data with an Analytical Model
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid Piezoelectric and Reverse Electrowetting Energy Harvester for Wearable Biosensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

A Flexible PCB-Based MEMS Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator †

Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097201
Published: 23 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference)

Abstract

:
This paper describes a simulated MEMS field mill that utilizes a vertical movement shutter powered by an electrostatic actuator. The design is based upon a Flexible PCB substrate to enable faster prototyping and lower cost. The simulation results show that if the system operates at a resonance, a 10 kV/m field will induce a current of 53 pA, resulting in a charge induction efficiency of 5.3 pA/(kV/m).

1. Introduction

Electric-field sensors are designed to measure electric-field strength. Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) electric-field sensors have gained significant popularity in recent years due to their small size, lightweight, low power consumption, and low cost [1]. Some of their common applications include voltage measurement in power systems, fault diagnosis in electrical equipment, electrostatic hazard warning, etc. Some MEMS electric-field sensors mimic conventional field mills by utilizing a shutter that moves laterally [2,3]. However, these sensors face a problem where their sensitivity is considerably reduced when the shutter is largely deflected in a strong field. To overcome this issue, some sensors use a shutter that moves vertically [4,5], which compensates for the displacement. In recent years, many MEMS devices on Flexible Printed Circuit Board (FPCB) have been reported [6]. The FPCB incorporates a polyimide substrate and copper layers, allowing for the fabrication of MEMS devices with reduced cost and increased efficiency through commercialized manufacturing.
This paper presents a simulation of a MEMS electric-field sensor with a vertical movement shutter driven by electrostatic forces. The sensor is designed based on upon a FPCB substrate. The resonant frequency and sensor performance in a dc field are simulated.

2. Sensor Design

The sensor’s operation is depicted in Figure 1. The shutter and sensing electrodes are both grounded. When the shutter moves up and down within an electric field, the sensing electrodes detect variations in the field caused by the changes in the fringing effect. As a result, varying charges are induced, leading to the generation of an alternating current if shutter moves periodically.
The design of the sensor is illustrated in Figure 2, and it includes a shutter, sensing electrodes, and a bottom driving electrode. The shutter is supported by four 1000 µm long S-shaped micro springs. The sensing electrodes have a size of 60 µm × 1000 µm, and there are 12 sensing electrodes on each side of the sensor. The size of the electrostatic driving electrode is 920 µm × 1200 µm. There are two grounded guard lines of 140 µm × 1200 µm on both sides of the driving electrode to reduce noise from the driving signal on the sensing electrodes. The distance between the shutter and the driving electrode is 100 µm. The thickness of the polyimide is 25 µm and the copper is 18 µm thick.

3. Results and Discussion

COMSOL Multiphysics was used for the simulations. Figure 3 shows the shutter’s downward movement when pulled by the driving electrode. Figure 4 depicts the distribution of the electric field between the driving electrode and the surrounding grounded structures. We can see that the sensing electrodes are minimally affected by the driving voltage. The shutter resonant frequency is 493 Hz. When a 200 V is applied to the driving electrode, the shutter’s downward displacement is 5.7 µm, and the induced charge on the sensing electrodes is 2.5 fC. At resonance, with a Q factor of ~100, the driving voltage will only be about 20 V, and the noise current is calculated to be 0.4 pA. In an electric field of 10 kV/m, the motion results in an induced charge of 0.17 pC, while at rest (0 V drive) the induced charge is 0.153 pC. When operating at the resonant frequency, the generated current is calculated to be 53 pA, and the efficiency of charge induction is 5.3 pA/(kV/m). The sensing signal is 130 times stronger than the driving noise. The efficiency of charge induction is comparable to [7].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.; methodology, T.C.; design and fabrication, T.C.; validation, T.C.; formal analysis, T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, T.C.; writing—review and editing, C.S. and T.C.; visualization, T.C.; supervision, C.S.; project administration, C.S.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (grant no. RGPIN-05019-2022), Mitacs (Canada) (grant no. IT17156), and Manitoba Hydro International (Winnipeg, Canada).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xia, S.; Lei, H.; Liu, J.; Peng, S.; Peng, C.; Yang, P.; Wen, X.; Chu, Z. Research and Development on MEMS Based Electric Field Sensor. Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers). In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Orlando, FL, USA, 20–24 June 2021; pp. 505–508. [Google Scholar]
  2. Horenstein, M.N.; Stone, P.R. A Micro-Aperture Electrostatic Field Mill Based on MEMS Technology. J. Electrost. 2001, 51–52, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wijeweera, G.; Bahreyni, B.; Shafai, C.; Rajapakse, A.; Swatek, D.R. Micromachined Electric Field Sensor to Measure ac and dc Fields in Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2009, 24, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghionea, S.; Smith, G.; Pulskamp, J.; Bedair, S.; Meyer, C.; Hull, D. MEMS Electric-Field Sensor with Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT)-Actuated Electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE SENSORS, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3–6 November 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, T.; Shafai, C.; Rajapakse, A.; Park, B.Y. Micromachined Electric Field Mill Employing a Vertical Moving Shutter. Procedia Eng. 2014, 87, 452–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Petropoulosa, A.; Pagonis, D.N.; Kaltsas, G. Flexible PCB-MEMS Flow Sensor. In Proceedings of the Eurosensors Conference, Kraków, Poland, 9–12 September 2012; Volume 47, pp. 236–239. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chu, Z.; Peng, C.; Ren, R.; Ling, B.; Zhang, Z.; Lei, H.; Xia, S. A High Sensitivity Electric Field Microsensor Based on Torsional Resonance. Sensors 2018, 18, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Operation principle.
Figure 1. Operation principle.
Proceedings 97 00201 g001
Figure 2. Sensor design.
Figure 2. Sensor design.
Proceedings 97 00201 g002
Figure 3. Shutter movement.
Figure 3. Shutter movement.
Proceedings 97 00201 g003
Figure 4. Driving electric-field distribution.
Figure 4. Driving electric-field distribution.
Proceedings 97 00201 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, T.; Shafai, C. A Flexible PCB-Based MEMS Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator. Proceedings 2024, 97, 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097201

AMA Style

Chen T, Shafai C. A Flexible PCB-Based MEMS Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Tao, and Cyrus Shafai. 2024. "A Flexible PCB-Based MEMS Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097201

APA Style

Chen, T., & Shafai, C. (2024). A Flexible PCB-Based MEMS Field Mill with a Vertical Movement Shutter Driven by an Electrostatic Actuator. Proceedings, 97(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097201

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop