Next Article in Journal
Mapping, Modeling and Designing a Marble Quarry Using Integrated Electric Resistivity Tomography and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Study of Adaptive Decision-Making
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous Flight Based on Real-World Flight Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Power Line Inspections: Current Innovations, Trends, and Future Prospects

1
Asset Management Department, National Transmission Company of South Africa SOC Ltd., Maxwell Dr, Sunninghill, Sandton 2157, South Africa
2
Department of Electrical and Smart Systems Engineering, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Florida Campus, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Ave, Florida Park, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drones 2025, 9(4), 265; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040265
Submission received: 11 October 2024 / Revised: 19 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025

Abstract

:
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) make power line inspections more safe, efficient, and cost-effective, replacing risky manual checks and expensive helicopter surveys while overcoming challenges like stability and regulations. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the application of UAVs for power line inspections. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology is implemented to ensure a structured and comprehensive review process. The Scopus database is used to identify relevant publications, and after screening and applying eligibility criteria, 75 documents were selected for further analysis. The study results show a shift toward predictive maintenance, multi-UAV operations, and real-time data analysis. However, challenges remain, including UAV–grid connectivity, resilience to extreme weather, and large-scale automation. This work provides key insights into technological and algorithmic advancements and research trends on UAV-based power line inspections while pointing out gaps in the existing literature. Finally, future research directions to advance UAV-based power line inspections are suggested.

1. Introduction

UAVs, commonly known as drones, are aircraft that operate without an onboard human pilot [1]. They can be controlled remotely or autonomously [2]; they have gained significant importance across various sectors due to their versatility and cost-effectiveness [3,4,5] and can be used for various purposes, including military operations, surveillance, and civilian applications [6,7]. In the previous years, their global market grew from USD 3.4 billion in 2008 to USD 7.3 billion in 2017 [8], driven by applications like real-time monitoring and precision agriculture [9,10]. In the coming years, the global UAV market is projected to experience significant growth. By 2025, the market capacity is expected to triple [11], with estimates ranging from USD 45 billion for civil infrastructure applications [9] to USD 125 billion for civilian commercial drones by 2032 [12]. The USA, China, and France are the leading producers of commercial drones [11]. Key sectors driving market growth include agriculture, pipeline and railroad inspection, construction, and maritime applications [13].
UAVs come in different types, such as (1) fixed-wing hybrid, (2) fixed-wing, (3) single-rotor, and multirotor [14], with fixed-wing and multirotor being the most popular [15]. A fixed-wing hybrid combines the characteristics of fixed-wing UAVs and quadcopters, merging the advantages of both designs for military and civil applications and addressing the limitations inherent in fixed-wing and rotary-wing drones [16]. Fixed-wing UAVs are widely used in various sectors, including agriculture for monitoring, mapping, and dropping, as well as in real estate, film, TV, oil and gas, construction, fisheries, wildlife surveillance, water management, and security [17,18,19,20,21,22]. They are particularly effective in surveillance and reconnaissance during disasters and for monitoring overhead transmission lines, offering extensive imagery coverage and real-time low-latency monitoring [23,24,25,26].
Single-rotor UAVs are noted for their versatility and efficiency, especially in agriculture for spraying fertilizers and pesticides [27]. Despite challenges in flight stabilization and control systems, they have significant potential in various applications [28,29,30,31,32]. Multirotor UAVs, comprising bicopters, tricopters, quadcopters, hexacopters, and octocopters, are highly versatile and used in military operations, delivery, rescue, weather forecasting, agriculture, entertainment, communication, and defense [33,34,35,36,37]. They also play roles in disaster management, construction safety, precision agriculture, and power grid supervision, with ongoing advancements in power sources, energy management, obstacle avoidance, and human-supervised inspection systems [38,39]. Table 1 presents different classifications of UAV types and their areas of application.
Traditionally, inspecting power lines has been a labor-intensive foot patrol and hazardous task, requiring workers to scale heights and navigate difficult terrains and costly manned helicopter methods [40,41,42]. Foot patrols [43,44] are slow and often miss defects, while manned helicopters, despite being equipped with advanced cameras, are unsafe and expensive, as noted in [45,46]. Meanwhile, [47,48] criticized these outdated methods for their inefficiency and high risk. Maintenance under high voltage conditions requires extreme labor and poses significant risks, as highlighted in [49,50,51]. Conversely, power lines will forever be exposed to risks such as fires (i.e., bushfires or wildfires), hostile climatical environments (i.e., snow, strong winds, rain, sunlight, extreme temperatures), vegetation interferes, bird nests, extra high voltages, mechanical tension, etc. [52,53,54,55], and these phenomena sometimes result in physical defects and power interruption. The economic impact of power interruptions is significant, with annual costs estimated at USD 150 billion [56], while the electricity consumer-related cost is estimated at USD 80 billion annually, with a potential range of USD 30–130 billion [57], as observed in the U.S. Considering these factors, adopting advanced line inspection methods like UAVs is crucial for improving safety, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness [58]; also, navigation techniques are being explored to enhance inspection capabilities and accuracy [59].
UAVs are increasingly important for power line inspections due to their ability to improve efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods [60,61,62]. These systems employ various sensors, including LiDAR, optical cameras, and thermal imaging, to detect faults and collect comprehensive data on electrical infrastructure [63,64,65]. Advanced path planning algorithms and control strategies, such as Particle Swarm Optimization and fuzzy PD control, enable UAVs to navigate complex environments and maintain optimal inspection distances [61,66], while vision-based detection systems enhance UAV navigation and power line identification [67,68]. Despite challenges such as flight stability, safety concerns, environmental factors, sensor integration, and regulatory issues [69], UAVs offer significant advantages over traditional methods, such as reduced costs, improved safety, enhanced efficiency, and infrastructure disruption [70,71,72]. Therefore, as UAV inspection technology matures, efforts are being made to standardize practices and promote international adoption, particularly in emerging countries with developing power networks [73].
Several key studies have laid the groundwork in this field; for example, Alhassan et al. (2020) [74] and Yang et al. (2020) [75] explored key challenges and methodologies, while Mohsan et al. (2022) [4] addressed UAV security concerns. Research in 2023 [76] further investigated UAV swarms and infrastructure needs. Chamola et al. (2021) [77] and Foudeh et al. (2021) [78] examined vulnerabilities and fault detection. Williams et al. (2001) [79], Martins et al. (2020) [80], and Surantha et al. (2022) [81] highlighted UAV benefits, such as safety and energy efficiency, while Liu et al. (2020) [82,83] and Sun et al. (2021) [84] advanced autonomous inspection techniques. However, gaps remain in regulatory issues, operational limitations, and multi-platform integration. For instance, Nguyen et al. (2018) [85] and Gonçalves et al. (2023) [86] focused on vision-based methods but lacked broader application contexts, while the security was addressed without tackling real-world challenges. Fault detection and path planning have improved [60,67], but human acceptance and reliability need more focus [71,87]. Wang et al. (2021) [88] discussed historical UAV use, Sun et al. (2021) [84] examined navigation, and Fahmani et al. (2022) [89] proposed safe distance estimation.
While the existing literature on UAVs for overhead power line inspections covers a broad range of topics, there is a notable gap in the literature concerning a comprehensive review analysis of fault identification strategies, algorithms and UAV-based systems, challenges and developments, robotic vision and UAV innovations, UAV technologies for autonomous operations, and AI-driven UAV systems. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a systematic review of the application of UAVs for power line inspections with a special focus on innovative advancements, related trends analysis, and future research prospects. The key study objectives include the following:
  • Adopt the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework to ensure a systematic, transparent, and comprehensive review process.
  • Review advancements in UAV-based power line inspections, including fault detection, advanced algorithms, system challenges, robotic vision, autonomous UAV technologies, and AI-driven inspection systems.
  • Highlight the emerging trends and observations in the UAV-based power line inspection research area from 2019 to 2023.
  • Provide recommendations for future research directions based on the gaps identified in the current literature.
This work highlights key technological and algorithmic advancements, analyzes research trends, points out gaps in the existing literature through discussions and observations, and suggests future research directions to improve UAV-based power line inspections, providing valuable insights into the field.
This paper is organized into the following sections: Section 2 covers the progressions of UAVs in power system inspection. Section 3 outlines the research methods applied during this study. Section 4 discusses the results obtained and provides an analysis of the findings. Section 5 offers a summary of the overall study discussions and observations. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions drawn from this study and suggests potential areas for future research.

2. Progressions of UAVs in Power System Inspection

The use of UAVs in power system inspections has progressed rapidly, with various models differing in size, range, and endurance [90]. Drones have become crucial in geospatial applications [91], and the global UAV market is valued at over USD 127 billion, with USD 9 billion in 2020 dedicated to inspection technologies [92]. In the U.S., the UAV market grew from USD 40 million in 2012 to USD 1 billion in 2017 and is forecasted to contribute USD 31–USD 46 billion to the GDP by 2026 [93]. Recent studies highlight improvements in inspection systems through machine learning [84], UAV performance assessments [94], and autonomous inspection systems. Advanced systems for power line inspections were also developed [95,96], while in [97], UAV use in utility inspections was documented, showcasing significant progress in this area. These studies collectively demonstrate the significant progress in the use of UAVs for power system inspection, with a focus on the developments around autonomous inspection, efficiency, and accuracy. Figure 1 is a conceptual representation of an autonomous power line inspection system, showcasing UAV-based monitoring, cloud-based data processing, and automated battery replacement.
The UAV task begins with an upload via a signal tower, allowing it to autonomously inspect power insulators and bird nests. Photos are uploaded to a cloud-based system for analysis, and the inspection report is stored in a database. The UAV returns to a base station for battery replacement. Accurate inspections rely on equations for flight height and tower identification [89], as demonstrated in Equations (1)–(3) below. Equation (1) can be used to calculate the appropriate height h at which the UAV should fly to maintain an optimal view of the power line, ensuring that the UAV captures the necessary details while maintaining a safe distance from the line, while the additional factor α might include safety margins or adjustments for specific operational conditions:
h = t a n F O V v 2 × d + α
where h is the height that should be maintain by UAV above the power line, using the vertical field of view ( F O V v ) , the horizontal distance d, and an adjustment factor α . Equation (2) allows the UAV to accurately calculate the direction of a transmission tower with respect to true north. The first term accounts for the UAV’s rotation, and the second term adjusts this based on the position of the tower within the camera’s field of view. This calculation is essential for precise navigation and mapping during power line inspections and can be expressed as follows:
θ = ω t + t a n 1 t a n F O V h 2 1 2 W T W
where ω is the rotational speed (in degrees or radians per second), t is the rotational time duration (in seconds), t a n   F O V h / 2 is the tangent of half of the horizontal field of view of the optical camera, and ( 1 2 W T / W ) is the relative horizontal position of the transmission tower within the image, where W T is the width coordinate value corresponding to the center position of the bounding box (the detected transmission tower) and W is the total width of the image. Finally, the inverse tangent function is used to convert the tangent value back to an angle. As explained above, the following equation evaluates the level of ascent δ for a transmission tower.
Accurately identifying and distinguishing transmission towers from other tall structures, like large trees, is crucial. One effective characteristic for this purpose is the steep ascent or vertical profile of the transmission tower. This characteristic can help avoid misrecognition because both transmission towers and large trees may exhibit high vertical density in their point cloud data. Thus, Equation (3) can be used to evaluate the level of ascent δ for a transmission tower.
δ = 1 8 i = 1 8 H H s , i
where H represent the height of the transmission tower and H s ,   i are the heights of the surrounding points in the environment, where subscript s,i indicates that there are eight surrounding points considered in the calculation. The summation aggregates the elevation differences for all eight surrounding points, and the division by 8 provides a normalized measure of the ascent level.
The optimal flight altitude for UAVs is crucial, balancing image resolution and power consumption [99]. Studies have shown a correlation between flight altitude and defect detection in photovoltaic modules [100,101]. For power line inspections, maintaining a distance of 15–20 m from infrastructure while flying at least 5 m/s is recommended to meet safety and efficiency requirements [102]. UAVs equipped with various sensors, including visible light cameras, infrared thermal imaging, and GPS, can effectively detect faults and obstacles within power line corridors [103,104]. However, challenges remain in data processing, automation, and regulatory frameworks [105], highlighting the need for further research and development in this field.

3. Research Methodology

This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology to examine UAV applications in power line inspections, focusing on structured literature synthesis [106]. This methodology is particularly important in fields with a large volume of literature, such as engineering, and it follows key phases: planning, conducting, and reporting [107,108] on this review. Systematic reviews remain underused in Library and Information Science [109], though statistical methods help address publication bias and nonrandomized evidence synthesis [110]. Study quality and interpretation are critical [111]. To ensure consistency, this research follows the PRISMA guidelines [112].

3.1. Identification

The initial phase of this study involved a comprehensive search for relevant documents within the Scopus database. This process yielded a total of 238 initial records. The search was conducted using a strategic combination of keywords to ensure thorough coverage of the topic. Specifically, the keywords “UAV”, “unmanned aerial vehicle”, and “drone” were used in conjunction with “power line inspections”. This approach was designed to capture a wide range of the literature pertaining to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the context of power line inspection operations. The resulting dataset forms the basis for subsequent analysis and review.

3.2. Screening

The filtering process was initiated to refine the initial set of 238 documents. The first criterion applied was the range of publication years, limited to the period from 2019 to 2023, which resulted in 147 remaining documents. Next, the search was restricted to the subject area of “engineering”, further narrowing the pool to 99 documents. Subsequently, the document type was filtered to include only articles and conference papers, reducing the count to 94. Finally, the language criterion was applied, selecting only English-language documents, which left 92 documents. These 92 documents were then exported for further analysis and qualified for the subsequent screening process.

3.3. Eligibility

Table 2 lists 75 research papers published between 2019 and 2023, covering technological advancements, learning algorithms, and autonomous systems. Initially, 92 papers were selected for review, but some had to be excluded. Of the excluded papers, 10 were inaccessible, 5 were review articles that did not meet the study criteria, and 2 were unrelated to UAVs and power line inspections. After filtering out these papers, 75 remained, forming the core dataset for further analysis.

3.4. Classification and Synthesis of Key Themes

The synthesis of the 75 finalist documents involved a comprehensive thematic classification, grouping the research findings into key themes, such as detection and fault identification strategies, which examined methods for identifying abnormalities and faults in power lines; challenges and developments, which focused on advancements and barriers in UAV technology; robotic vision and UAV innovations, which explored improvements in robotic vision used for inspections; UAV technologies for autonomous operations, which highlighted progress in UAV autonomy and navigation; advanced algorithms and UAV-based systems, which showcased algorithmic improvements that enhance UAV performance; and, finally, AI-driven UAV systems, which investigated how AI is being used to boost decision-making and fault diagnosis. This classification offered a clear analysis of how UAV technology is evolving in the context of power line inspections and related applications.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Bibliometric Analysis

4.1.1. Annual Scientific Production and Application Areas of UAV Usage in Power Line Inspections

Figure 2a presents the trend in annual and cumulative publications from 2019 to 2023. In 2019, there were 12 articles, but this number slightly dropped to 11 in 2020. From 2021 onward, the number of publications gradually increased, reaching 15 in 2021, 17 in 2022, and 20 in 2023. As a result, the cumulative total grew from 12 in 2019 to 75 by 2023. The data show a steady rise in research output, with the most noticeable increase occurring in the final two years, indicating a growing focus on this area of study. Figure 2b shows how the research publications are distributed across different themes.
The largest share, with 21 articles, focuses on detection and fault identification strategies, indicating a strong interest in this area. Algorithms and UAV-based systems follow closely with 18 articles, reflecting efforts to integrate UAVs with algorithmic solutions. Robotic vision and UAV innovations and UAV technologies for autonomous operations each account for 11 articles, highlighting ongoing research into UAV applications for inspection and automation. Meanwhile, challenges and developments and AI-driven UAV systems each have seven publications, showing that while these topics are important, they have received comparatively less attention. Overall, the distribution suggests a growing focus on UAVs and advanced algorithms for detection, fault identification, and automation.

4.1.2. Most Cited Journals and Conferences in UAV Power Line Inspections

Table 3 highlights the top 10 most cited journals and conferences in the field, showing where key research is concentrated. Sensors stands out with the highest citations (134), indicating its strong influence. Electronics (63) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (35) also have significant impact. The list includes both high-impact journals and specialized conferences, reflecting diverse research interests, particularly in automation, robotics, and system control.

4.1.3. Top 10 Most Cited Publications in UAV Power Line Inspections

Table 4 presents the top 10 most cited publications in UAV power line inspections, highlighting key research contributions in the field. The most cited paper, “LiDAR-based real-time detection and modeling of power lines for unmanned aerial vehicles” by [115], received 56 citations, reflecting the growing importance of LiDAR technology in UAV-based inspections. Other highly cited works focus on deep learning applications, autonomous UAV systems, and cooperative aerial–ground inspection strategies. The presence of multiple studies from 2019 to 2021 indicates a rapidly evolving research landscape, with increasing emphasis on AI-driven fault detection, multi-robot collaboration, and real-time data processing for power line monitoring.

4.2. Innovative Advancements in UAV-Based Power Line Inspections

4.2.1. UAV-Based Approaches and Algorithms for Power Line Fault Detection and Inspection

Object detection plays a pivotal role in identifying bird nests and insulators, enhancing power line detection performance. For instance, in [113,114], Zhang et al. (2019) and Wang et al. (2020) introduced CNN-based frameworks for automated detection of abnormalities in power line infrastructure, while Azevedo et al. (2019) proposed PL2DM [115], which leverages LiDAR for real-time detection of power lines even in challenging environmental conditions. Image processing and recognition techniques [116,117], as outlined by Fang et al. (2020) and Solilo et al. (2021), have been employed for detecting transmission line defects and tracking power lines using color transformation techniques, respectively.
Innovative control strategies in support of these methods, such as the weighted consensus control method introduced by Xu et al. (2019), ensure robust fault detection and global load balancing in multi-drone systems utilized for power line inspection [118]. Additionally [119,120], advancements in object detection, demonstrated by Li et al. (2022) and Akhmetov et al. (2022), have enabled the real-time detection of bird nests and insulators using optimized YOLO (You Only Look Once) variants. In ensuring collaborative model training for insulator detection while preserving data privacy, Liu and Zhong (2022) proposed the integration of federated learning [121]. Korki et al. (2019) introduced the concept designs for automatic fault detection [122], underlining the pivotal role of UAVs in this field. Building upon this, Dai et al. (2022) proposed CODNet, a state-of-the-art method made for UAV navigation [123], while in complementing these efforts [124], Fang et al. (2020) emphasized the importance of efficient detection techniques and precise tower positioning for fault identification in power line inspection. Moreover, in [125], Han et al. (2023) conducted research on real-time multi-scale fault detection algorithms, which are specifically designed for UAV inspection, showcasing enhanced efficiency and accuracy compared to previous models.
Further advancing the capabilities of UAV-based inspection [126], Zhong et al. (2022) discussed a spatio-temporal correlation-based method for anomaly detection and recovery prediction in UAV flight data, while Xing et al. (2023) introduced an autonomous inspection system employing Model Predictive Control (MPC) and learning-based detectors for optimized line tracking and collision avoidance [127], further enriching the capabilities of UAV-based power line inspection. Additionally [128], Shuang et al. (2023) developed the RSIn-Dataset and proposed the YOLOv4++ network for insulator detection, further enriching the repertoire of detection techniques in UAV-based power line inspection. Li et al. (2023), in [129], aimed to improve power line detection performance in adverse weather conditions using the CSUNet image restoration model and a large-scale PLCD dataset, demonstrating enhanced object detection results. Hoang and Ebeid (2023) [130] and Ding et al. (2021) [131] established UAV-centric approaches for overhead transmission line inspections. By integrating sensor fusion techniques and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data analysis, navigation precision and vegetation encroachment detection were refined and shown to be vital for ensuring infrastructure integrity. Furthermore, Wang et al. (2021) [132] studied federated learning methods to address privacy concerns in collaborative model training, and this ensured data security while facilitating reliability improvement in power infrastructure maintenance. Demkiv et al. (2021), in [133], presented a stereo thermal vision system for Micro-Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (MUAVs) to inspect electrical power lines, detecting overheated equipment to prevent outages.
Enhancing defect detection precision through advanced algorithms is key to minimizing downtime and operational costs. For example, the works of Zheng et al. (2021) [134] and Siddiqui and Park (2020) [135] both delved into real-time object detection and defect identification within power line inspection systems. Leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), they refined methodologies for precise component identification and anomaly detection. Building on this, Li et al. (2023) [136] and Vemula and Frye (2020) [137] further optimized inspection processes with automated systems driven by deep learning methodologies, collectively aiming to streamline inspection workflows and bolster infrastructure reliability.
Liang et al. (2021) [138] and Song et al. (2022) [139] made significant strides in enhancing power line image quality and extraction through GAN-based deblurring frameworks and Mask RCNN-based algorithms, respectively, improving the reliability of inspection imagery and accurate power line identification. Yang et al. (2019) [140] employed deep learning methodologies for automatic insulator self-shattering identification, aligning with the overarching goal of enhancing defect detection precision. Pienroj et al. (2019) [141], Ayoub and Schneider-Kamp (2021) [142], and He et al. (2023) [143] revolutionized UAV-based inspection by deploying Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), real-time fault detection algorithms, and coordinated multi-UAV operations.
Han et al. (2022) [144], Zheng et al. (2023) [145], and Hamelin et al. (2019) [146] collectively explored various facets of UAV navigation during power line inspections, and their research encompassed power line segmentation optimization, reinforcement learning-based navigation strategies, and discrete-time control algorithms for trajectory planning and obstacle avoidance. These efforts aimed to enhance UAV autonomy and navigation efficiency, which are crucial for successful and safe inspection operations. Strategies like task offloading based on deep reinforcement learning, as proposed by Shen et al. (2022) [147], offered promising avenues for future research, ensuring enhanced safety, and efficiency in power infrastructure maintenance through the integration of cutting-edge algorithms and technologies in UAV-based power line inspection.
Kyuroson et al. (2023) [148] introduced unsupervised machine learning frameworks tailored for vegetation encroachment detection and precise power line structure analysis by employing probabilistic graphical models and clustering algorithms to enhance segmentation and classification tasks and further refining inspection methodologies and bolstering infrastructure resilience. Titov et al. (2019) [149] introduced a sophisticated deep learning-based system for utility pole detection and classification, aligning with An et al.’s (2023) [150] WaveGNet proposal for continuous refinement of power line detection methodologies. A method for evaluating UAV inspection image quality focused on power line devices was proposed by Wang et al. (2023) in [151], utilizing DeepLabv3+ and DenseNet121, which can serve as a foundation for enhancing image processing algorithms in aerial inspection tasks.

4.2.2. Challenges and Developments in UAVs for Monitoring

Recent research has focused on optimizing UAV trajectories, addressing electromagnetic interference (EMI), and enhancing UAV design for harsh environments. The following reviews explore these innovations and their challenges. As discussed by Silano et al. (2021) in [152], the generation of trajectories with explicit time requirements and adherence to velocity and acceleration constraints provides a flexible and effective solution for inspection tasks. In [153], Rad et al. (2023) underlined the impact of magnetic fields on drone sensors, stressing the necessity of considering these effects in future drone navigation research. Further advancements in UAV design were discussed in [154] by Mostafa et al. (2022), tackling challenges related to flying near transmission lines, such as EMI conditions, obstacle avoidance systems, and the impact of EMI on Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) sensors.
In addition to these advancements, in [155], Rad et al. (2023) presented a modular high-voltage transformer designed to study electric field impacts on drones, with experimental validation of its performance. Duan et al. (2022), in [156], introduced a novel UAV power patrol system based on wireless power transfer technology, addressing the limited application of UAVs in long-distance power line inspection. Furthermore, Skriver et al. (2022) [157] highlighted the experimental demonstration and evaluation of the HEIST methodology for recording EMI for UAVs approaching energized power lines. They emphasized the development of software robust toward EMI for safe UAV operation in harsh environments. Cesoni et al. (2022) [158] discussed the increasing use of UAVs for inspecting power lines and the challenges posed by the electromagnetic fields of high-voltage power lines.

4.2.3. Robotic Vision and UAV Innovations for Enhanced Power Line Inspections

Robotic vision techniques offer diverse approaches to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of power line inspections while covering different aspects such as stabilization, image quality assessment, thermal detection, positioning accuracy, and real-time mapping. In [159], Ye et al. (2023) discussed the significance of large-scale flapping wing robots (FWR) with airborne vision, presenting a novel digital video stabilization method validated through experiments with a 2.2 m wingspan FWR, which could enhance the stability of footage captured during power line inspections. In another study [160], Wang et al. (2023) designed a flexible towed aerial robot system for stabilizing X-ray cameras in power line inspections, validated through real-world experiments. Wang et al. (2022) and Wang et al. (2019), in [161,162], introduced mechanical systems for UAV power line inspections, enhancing safety and efficiency. The 2022 study involved a UAV-mounted system tested in the field, while the 2019 study combined UAV and climbing robot technologies for improved maintenance. Damigos et al. (2023), in [163], revealed that 5G-enabled UAVs for sensor data throughput can contribute to real-time data processing and communication in various robotic systems, enhancing their autonomy and responsiveness.
As stated by Cantieri et al. (2020) in [164], the exploration of augmented reality (AR) tags for UAV positioning accuracy can be integrated into robotic navigation systems for precise localization and mapping in dynamic environments. In addition, Liu et al. (2022), in [165], proposed a PTI-SLAM framework that can be applied to power tower inspection tasks, improving the efficiency and accuracy of robotic navigation and mapping in challenging environments. The Fuzzy-LADRC control method for quadrotor UAVs was introduced by Sun et al. (2021) in [166], which can be utilized to enhance the stability and flexibility of aerial robotic platforms in various missions. To investigate the secrecy outage performance of UAV systems, Pan et al. (2020), in [167], derived analytical expressions for secrecy outage probability and validating through Monte Carlo simulations, as this can also inform the development of secure communication protocols for robotic networks and ensure data integrity. Calvo et al. (2022), in [168], proposed software architecture leveraging a Robot Operating System (ROS) to coordinate heterogeneous aerial vehicles for power line inspections and maintenance tasks. This architecture integrated a High-Level Planner and Agent Behavior Manager on each UAV while facilitating seamless communication and coordination among the team. Silano et al. (2021), in [169], emphasized the urgent need for safe and efficient maintenance and inspection procedures in electrical power lines, particularly focusing on robotic solutions by proposing a software architecture that is based on ensuring compliance with safety requirements and mission success.

4.2.4. Advancements in UAV Technology for Autonomous Power Line Inspections

As highlighted by Wang (2021) in [170], the advancements in autonomous navigation, visual guidance, and robust algorithms made for accurate measurements under diverse lighting conditions. Li et al. (2021), in [171], complemented this by presenting a mathematical model grounded on electric field distribution around transmission lines, ensuring resilience to environmental variables and real-time operational efficacy, substantiated through rigorous experimental validation. The introduction of ICARUS as an autonomous inspection platform integrating UAVs and AI for power infrastructure scrutiny, as articulated by Savva et al. (2021) [172], signified a pivotal hybrid navigation strategy augmented by a suite of sensors for dependable data acquisition. Takaya et al. (2019), in [173], expanded on a UAV system engineered for the autonomous inspection of energy networks, detailing its hardware configuration and software control systems validated through careful flight experimentation.
In [174], Schofield et al. (2020) presented a detailed framework for autonomous power line inspection, addressing key components and future developmental trajectories, while Iversen et al. (2021), in [175], explained an integrated drone system made for autonomous power line inspection, showcasing its ability in energy harvesting, AI-driven fault detection, and successful mission execution in diverse weather conditions. The autonomous UAV system presented by Lopez et al. (2021) in [176], for insulator cleaning on power lines, expressed a transformative approach toward mitigating risks and reducing operational costs. In support of this innovation, Alexiou et al. (2023), in [177], introduced a visual-guided navigation model stressing stability, robustness, and real-time performance, which was empowered by lightweight segmentation algorithms.
In [178], Perez-Jimenez et al. (2020) presented a UAV positioning system adroit at inspecting electric lines in GPS-denied environments, by means of enabling a range of inspection and maintenance tasks. Zhao et al. (2023), in [179], presented the optimization of UAV flight and communication energy consumption for autonomous power line patrols, highlighting the associated safety and efficiency benefits. The research by Cantieri et al. (2020) in [180] focused on using UAVs for the autonomous inspection of power distribution lines, addressing challenges like precise positioning, obstacle detection, and control.

4.2.5. AI-Driven UAV Systems for Power Line Inspections

Scholars have developed very advanced UAV systems equipped with advanced sensors and AI-driven data processing to ensure precise, efficient, and safe inspections of power lines. For instance, in [181], Moreno et al. (2022) introduced a Hybrid Fixed-Flapping Wing UAV for power line inspections, equipped with advanced avionics, cameras, and autonomous flight capabilities. Data acquisition included onboard avionics, a wattmeter, NanoPi, and motion capture systems for precise power consumption measurement and performance evaluation, utilizing data processing algorithms for accurate assessment. An AI-powered UAV system for urban power line inspection in Brazil was presented by Rangel et al. (2022) in [182], using drones with various sensors for data acquisition. Onboard AI processes images, recognizes patterns, and facilitates autonomous navigation through SIGI software, generating GIS-based maps and maintenance databases using data analysis algorithms.
Tsellou et al. (2023) and Du et al. (2022) highlighted UAVs’ role in enhancing fault detection and transmission line inspections using RGB and thermal sensors. Their data analysis involved image segmentation and machine learning algorithms to locate power lines and identify faults [183], with data transmitted to ground systems for navigation through the UAV equipped with various sensors and cameras for data collection [184]. UAVs for precise power line inspections with high-precision spatial data acquisition and real-time processing were emphasized in the studies by Liu et al. (2021) and Medrano et al. (2020). The data underwent denoising and segmentation algorithms for accuracy, and an Autonomous Data Acquisition System (ADAS) employed computer vision algorithms for high-quality visual data capture [185] [186]. UAV applications in improving efficiency and safety in power line inspections were discussed by Constantin and Dinculescu (2019) in [187]. Sensor-equipped UAVs gather detailed power lines and solar panel information, with data processing and analysis algorithms identifying maintenance needs and efficiently planning repairs.

4.3. Related Trend Analysis

To explore research trends, VOS-Viewer software (version 1.6.19.0) was used to analyze the 75 selected papers through a structured approach. This study applied co-occurrence analysis, examining how frequently keywords appeared together. A full counting method was chosen, making sure that all keyword occurrences were counted equally. The analysis considered all keywords from the papers, but to highlight the most relevant terms, a minimum threshold of three occurrences was set. Out of 749 unique keywords, 44 met this threshold. For these, the total strength of their co-occurrence links with other keywords was calculated. The keywords with the highest link strength were then selected for further analysis, offering a clear picture of key research themes.

4.3.1. Cluster Analysis of UAV Applications in Inspection Tasks

Table 5 presents keywords grouped into five clusters, reflecting different research directions in UAV-based inspections based on their occurrences and total link strength. In Cluster 1 (red), the focus is on AI-driven fault detection, where “aircraft detection” appears 29 times, with a 208 link strength, and “deep learning” appears 21 times, with a 152 link strength. These numbers indicate that deep learning is a key tool in UAV-based fault identification and image analysis. Cluster 2 (green) highlights UAV applications in power infrastructure, with “power line inspections” having 54 occurrences and a 319 link strength, while “inspection” appears 38 times, with a 266 link strength. This suggests that UAVs are widely researched for automating power grid monitoring and improving maintenance strategies. Cluster 3 (blue) focuses on UAV technology and control, where “unmanned aerial vehicles” dominate, with 67 occurrences and a 396 link strength, followed by “antennas”, with 44 occurrences and a 296 link strength. The high numbers here suggest ongoing advancements in UAV flight control, navigation, and communication systems.
Cluster 4 (Yellow) examines UAV-based inspection methods, where “aerial vehicle” appears 10 times, with an 84 link strength, and “deep reinforcement learning” appears 3 times, with a 17 link strength. Although these numbers are lower, they show an emerging interest in making UAVs more autonomous. Cluster 5 (purple) relates to object detection and infrastructure monitoring, where “objects detection” has six occurrences, with a 54 link strength, and “power supply company” appears three times, with a 27 link strength. This shows that UAVs are being explored for asset tracking, outage detection, and security applications. The overall observation is an indication that the keyword distribution shows a clear trend toward integrating AI in UAV inspections, particularly in power transmission and defect detection. The strong presence of deep learning and power line inspections suggests these are central research areas, while the emerging focus on reinforcement learning indicates a shift toward more autonomous UAV operations. Future studies will likely enhance UAV decision-making, improve AI-driven analytics, and expand UAV applications for large-scale infrastructure maintenance.

4.3.2. Network Map Visualization Analysis of UAV Applications in Inspection Tasks

Figure 3 visually represents how research topics related to UAV-based power line inspections are connected. The larger keywords indicate topics that appear more frequently in the studies, with “unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)”, “inspection”, and “deep learning” being the most common. The thickness of the lines between the keywords shows how closely they are related, where the strong link between “deep learning”, “power line detection”, and “image processing” suggests that researchers are focusing on AI-driven fault detection. The different colors separate major research themes. The red group studies how AI can help UAVs inspect images. The key terms include “convolutional neural networks” and “neural networks”. The green group looks at how UAVs are used in power networks. The important terms are “power line inspections” and “electric power transmission networks”, which show how UAVs aid in monitoring and maintenance. The blue group focuses on improving UAV technology, featuring “antennas”, “flight control systems”, and “robotics”, which enhance navigation and performance.
The yellow group examines how to operate UAVs autonomously. This group uses “deep reinforcement learning” and studies the “inspection process” to improve AI-controlled drones. Collectively, the groups demonstrate a strong connection between UAVs and AI, paving the way for a more efficient future. Furthermore, the purple group highlights object detection, with “object detection” and “outages”, suggesting that UAVs are used to identify faults and improve grid reliability. This network of research topics suggests that UAVs are increasingly used in power line inspections, with AI being a key factor in improving automation and fault detection. The strong links between different areas indicate that research is moving toward making UAVs more autonomous, enhancing real-time monitoring, and refining data analysis techniques for better power grid management.

4.3.3. Overlay Map Visualization Analysis of UAV Applications in Inspection Tasks

Figure 4 provides an overlay map of research topics in UAV-based power line inspections from 2019 to 2023, where the color gradient indicates how the research focus has changed over time. Earlier studies, shown in blue and dark green, which were published between 2019 and 2020, concentrated on UAV technology fundamentals, with keywords like “flight control systems”, “robotics”, and “convolutional neural networks” reflecting the development of UAV hardware and AI-based image processing. In the green shades, from 2021 onward, there is a noticeable shift toward UAV applications in infrastructure monitoring, with increasing research on “transmission line”, “image enhancement”, and “power line detection”, indicating an increasing trend toward practical deployment. Recent research, shown in yellow, conducted between 2022 and 2023, indicates a growing focus on AI-driven automation, as seen in keywords like “deep reinforcement learning”, “inspection process”, and “learning algorithms”, indicating efforts to make UAV inspections more autonomous and predictive. The observations show that large nodes like “unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)” and “deep learning” remain central across all years, confirming that AI integration continues to drive UAV advancements. The increasing presence of “inspection process” and “learning algorithms” between 2022 and 2023 suggests a trend toward real-time, AI-powered decision-making in UAV-based inspections. Future research is expected to enhance UAV autonomy, improve fault detection accuracy, and develop more efficient data-driven inspection methods for power grid monitoring.

5. Overall Discussion and Observations

This review highlights progress in power line inspections that are based on UAVs while pointing out several areas that still need improvement. AI techniques, such as CNNs, LiDAR, and federated learning, have improved fault detection, but challenges remain, particularly in real-time identification under extreme weather conditions. Image processing techniques like reinforcement learning and GAN-based deblurring have improved UAV capabilities, but large-scale multi-UAV coordination is still lacking. Another major challenge is electromagnetic interference, which affects UAV performance, along with battery life limitations that restrict flight duration. These issues suggest a need for EMI-resistant UAVs and better power solutions, such as wireless charging or energy-efficient navigation systems.
The cluster analysis of UAV applications shows that research is largely focused on AI-powered inspections, power infrastructure monitoring, UAV navigation, and object detection. Deep learning has become a dominant tool for power line inspections, but newer research is exploring reinforcement learning to improve UAV autonomy. One of the main gaps in this area is the integration of UAVs into predictive maintenance and smart grid systems. Enhancing UAV performance in extreme weather conditions and ensuring communication that is reliable between UAVs and power networks are ongoing concerns and need more attention.
The network analysis reveals strong links between deep learning, power line detection, and image processing, highlighting AI’s growing role in UAV inspections. However, a complete integration of predictive maintenance systems and asset management is still a lacking area of consideration. In making UAV inspections more effective, improvements are needed in UAV communication networks, AI-driven mission planning, and real-time monitoring capabilities. While UAVs are being used for outage detection and infrastructure security, their ability to perform large-scale inspections autonomously remains an area for further development.
The overlay map analysis shows a shift in research priorities over time. Earlier research from 2019 to 2020 focused mostly on AI-based image processing and on UAV hardware; however, recent research from 2022 to 2023 has moved toward predictive analytics and automation. The increased emphasis on real-time learning algorithms specifies a trend toward proactive fault detection. Moving forward, research should pay attention to improving onboard AI processing, evolving coordinated UAV fleets for large-scale inspections, and refining UAV resilience in harsh environments. Addressing these challenges will improve UAV effectiveness in power grid maintenance and long-term asset monitoring.

6. Conclusions and Proposed Future Research Directions

This paper systematically reviewed the application of UAVs for power line inspections using the PRISMA methodology to ensure a structured and comprehensive analysis. The Scopus database was utilized to identify relevant publications, resulting in the selection of 75 documents after screening and eligibility assessment. Among other things, this study included bibliometric analysis, covering the top 10 most cited journals and conference proceedings and the top 10 most cited publications in the field. Additionally, this review examined innovative advancements such as UAV-based fault detection strategies and algorithms, UAV-based monitoring challenges, robotic vision, UAV autonomous technologies, and AI-driven UAV systems. Thereafter, emerging trends and the gaps in the existing literature were discussed. Notably, advancements in predictive maintenance, multi-UAV operations, and real-time data analysis were observed. However, significant challenges remain, including operational issues, resilience to extreme weather, and large-scale automation.
Finally, future research directions to improve UAV-based power line inspections are proposed as follows:
  • While image processing techniques like reinforcement learning and GAN-based deblurring have enhanced UAV capabilities, effective coordination of multiple UAVs for large-scale inspections is still lacking. Research should explore advanced swarm intelligence and cooperative control algorithms.
  • UAV performance is affected by EMI, which can disrupt navigation and data transmission. There is a need for EMI-resistant UAVs and improved shielding techniques to enhance operational reliability.
  • Limited battery life affects UAV flight duration, posing a significant challenge for long-range power line inspections. Research should explore wireless charging solutions, energy-efficient navigation, and hybrid power sources to extend UAV endurance.
  • UAVs have yet to be fully integrated into predictive maintenance frameworks and smart grid operations. Future studies should focus on seamless data exchange, interoperability with grid monitoring systems, and AI-driven decision-making.
  • The shift toward predictive analytics and automation highlights the importance of enhancing onboard AI processing capabilities. Future research should focus on real-time edge computing and adaptive learning algorithms to improve UAV autonomy in inspections.
  • UAVs must be adapted to function effectively in extreme conditions, such as high winds, heavy rainfall, and fluctuating temperatures. Research should explore materials, aerodynamics, and sensor technologies that improve UAV durability and operational reliability.

Author Contributions

B.M. was responsible for the conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, original draft preparation, and visualization. N.M. provided supervision, validation, and funding acquisition. He also provided training on systematic review methodology, guided the overall paper structure, and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Bongumsa Mendu was employed by the company National Transmission Company of South Africa SOC Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saelam, K. Editorial note on Unmanned aerial vehicle. J. Aeronaut. Aerosp. Eng. 2021, 10, 245. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:238324644, (accessed on 11 August 2024).
  2. Tsach, S.; Tatievsky, A.; London, L. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alotaibi, A.; Chatwin, C.; Birch, P. Ubiquitous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review. Shanlax Int. J. Arts Sci. Humanit. 2023, 11, 62–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Khan, M.A.; Noor, F.; Ullah, I.; Alsharif, M.H. Towards the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2022, 6, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jaykumar, J. Drone types and its applications—A survey. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2020, 7, 7360–7368. [Google Scholar]
  6. Malone, P.K.; Apgar, H.E.; Stukes, S.; Sterk, S. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles unique cost estimating requirements. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 2–9 March 2013; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parrott, E. Drones. In Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management; Shapiro, L.R., Maras, M.H., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petrova, T.; Petrov, Z. Economic factors in the development and application of UAV’s and the fight with wild fires. Int. E-J. Adv. Soc. Sci. 2020, 6, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shakhatreh, H.; Sawalmeh, A.H.; Al-Fuqaha, A.I.; Dou, Z.; Almaita, E.K.; Khalil, I.M.; Othman, N.S.; Khreishah, A.; Guizani, M. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 48572–48634. [Google Scholar]
  10. Albeaino, G.; Gheisari, M.; Franz, B. A systematic review of unmanned aerial vehicle application areas and technologies in the AEC domain. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2019, 24, 381–405. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kapustina, L.; Izakova, N.; Makovkina, E.; Khmelkov, M. The global drone market: Main development trends. In Proceedings of the Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences, Zilina, Slovak Republic, 13–14 October 2021; SHS Web Conference: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 129, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kordos, A.; Kmiotek, M.; Żyłka, W.M.; Muszyński, T. The problem of recycling of unmanned aerial vehicles. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2024, 18, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vascik, P.D.; Jung, J. Assessing the impact of operational constraints on the near-term unmanned aircraft system traffic management supported market. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Washington, DC, USA, 13–17 June 2016; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA): Reston, VA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rawlins, L. Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In AntarcticGlaciers.org; Royal Holloway University of London: London, UK, 2023; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  15. Garg, P.K. Characterisation of Fixed-Wing Versus Multirotors UAVs/Drone. J. Geomat. 2022, 16, 152–158. [Google Scholar]
  16. Krishnaraj, S.; Senthil Kumar, R.; Gokula Krishnan, A.; Ganeshkumar, G.; Mohan, M.; Nirmal, M. Aerodynamic Analysis of Hybrid Drone. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1012, 012023. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ramesh, P.; Jeyan, J.M.L. Comparative Analysis of Fixed-Wing, Rotary-Wing and Hybrid Mini Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) from the Applications Perspective. INCAS Bull. 2022, 14, 137–151. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hakim, M.; Pratiwi, H.; Nugraha, A.; Yatmono, S.; Wardhana, A.; Damarwan, E.; Agustianto, T.; Noperi, S. Development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Fixed-Wing for Monitoring, Mapping and Dropping applications on agricultural land. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2111, 012051. [Google Scholar]
  19. Atole, R.R.; Bello, L.; Lirag, J.R.S. Eyes in the Sky: A Review of Civilian Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2017, 173, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nugroho, G.; Taha, Z.; Nugraha, T.S.; Hadsanggeni, H. Development of a Fixed Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Disaster Area Monitoring and Mapping. J. Mechatronics Electr. Power Veh. Technol. 2015, 6, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yi, W.; Liming, C.; Lingyu, K.; Jie, Z.; Mia, W. Research on application mode of large fixed-wing UAV system on overhead transmission line. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), Beijing, China, 27–29 October 2017; pp. 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sonkar, S.; Kumar, P.; Philip, D.; Ghosh, A.K. Low-Cost Smart Surveillance and Reconnaissance Using VTOL Fixed Wing UAV. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 7–14 March 2020; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dong, J.; Liu, D. Sensor Data Prediction for Fixed-wing Drone Based on Online Sequential Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 16–19 May 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Carholt, O.C.; Fresk, E.; Andrikopoulos, G.; Nikolakopoulos, G. Design, modelling and control of a Single Rotor UAV. In Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Athens, Greece, 21–24 June 2016; pp. 840–845. [Google Scholar]
  25. García, O.; Sanchez, A.; Escareño, J.; Lozano, R. Tail-sitter UAV having one tilting rotor: Modeling, Control and Real-Time Experiments. IFAC Proc. 2008, 41, 809–814. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gamble, G.; Yatsko, A.; Hockley, C.; Currier, P. Issues facing the development of a single-winged rotorcraft’s control system. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Southeastcon, Orlando, FL, USA, 15–18 March 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Imam, A.; Bicker, R. Design and Construction of a Small-scale Rotorcraft UAV System. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Innov. Technol. 2014, 3, 96–109. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nathan, P.T.; Almurib HA, F.; Kumar, T.N. A review of autonomous multi-agent quad-rotor control techniques and applications. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Mechatronics (ICOM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 17–19 May 2011; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  29. Steele, A.; Treurnicht, J. Review of standard rotor configurations for a micro unmanned aerial system. In Proceedings of the 2015 Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa and Robotics and Mechatronics International Conference (PRASA-RobMech), Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 26–27 November 2015; pp. 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jamisola, R.S.; Thebe, K.Z.; Ramalepa, L.P.; Mbedzi, O. Relative Jacobian-based Cooperative Control of Multi-rotor Drones. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Communication & Information Technology (ICICT), Basrah, Iraq, 5–6 June 2021; pp. 208–214. [Google Scholar]
  31. Agrawal, K.; Shrivastav, P. Multi-rotors: A Revolution In Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 4, 1800–1804. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sudarshan, M.K.; Vignesh, S. Flight Formation of multiple Rotor-craft through Co-ordination flying. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), Belgaum, India, 21–23 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramli, H.; Kuntjoro, W.; Makhtar, A.K. Advanced Autonomous Multirotor Response System. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 393, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pi, H.; Li, X.; Yuan, C.; Yang, Z.; Wei, L.; Lian, Z. Application of Multi-Rotor UAV Patrol System in Safety and Quality Management of Power Grid Construction Projects. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Electromechanical Automation (AIEA), Tianjin, China, 26–28 June 2020; pp. 416–419. [Google Scholar]
  35. Basiri, A.; Mariani, V.; Silano, G.; Aatif, M.; Iannelli, L.; Glielmo, L. A survey on the application of path-planning algorithms for multi-rotor UAVs in precision agriculture. J. Navig. 2022, 75, 364–383. [Google Scholar]
  36. Elouarouar, S.; Medromi, H. Multi-Rotors Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Power Supply and Energy Management. E3S Web Conf. 2022, 336, 00068. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lv, Q.; Deveerasetty, K.K.; Dike, H.U. A Review of Autonomous Obstacle Avoidance Technology for Multi-rotor UAVs. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), Wuyishan, China, 11–13 August 2018; pp. 244–249. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shaqura, M.; Alzuhair, K.; Abdellatif, F.; Shamma, J. Human Supervised Multirotor UAV System Design for Inspection Applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), Security, PH, USA, 6–8 August 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Montufar, D.I.; Muñoz, F.; Espinoza, E.S.; García, O.; Salazar, S. Multi-UAV testbed for aerial manipulation applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Orlando, FL, USA, 27–30 May 2014; pp. 830–835. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, Z.; Huang, J.; Zhou, T. Two-layer routing for high-voltage powerline inspection by cooperated ground vehicle and drone. Energies 2019, 12, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. A Vision-Based Broken Strand Detection Method for a Power-Line Maintenance Robot. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2014, 29, 2154–2161. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rodriguez-Castaño, A.; Nekoo, S.R.; Romero, H.; Salmoral, R.; Acosta, J.Á.; Ollero, A. Installation of Clip-Type Bird Flight Diverters on High-Voltage Power Lines with Aerial Manipulation Robot: Prototype and Testbed Experimentation. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Matikainen, L.; Lehtomäki, M.; Ahokas, E.; Hyyppä, J.; Karjalainen, M.; Jaakkola, A.; Kukko, A.; Heinonen, T. Remote sensing methods for power line corridor surveys. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 119, 10–31. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mostashfi, A.; Fakhari, A.; Badri, M.A. A novel design of inspection robot for high-voltage power lines. Ind. Robot Int. J. 2014, 41, 166–175. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pagnano, A.; Höpf, M.; Teti, R. A roadmap for automated power line inspection. Maintenance and repair. Procedia CIRP 2013, 12, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jayatilaka, M.; Shanmugavel, M.; Ragavan, S.V. Robonwire: Design and development of a power line inspection robot. In Proceedings of the 1st Intemational and 16th National Conference on Machinesand Mechanisms, Roorkee, India, 18–20 December 2013; pp. 808–815. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, M.; Cao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, E.; Liang, Z.; Tan, M. A Passive Compliance Obstacle-Crossing Robot for Power Line Inspection and Maintenance. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2023, 8, 2772–2779. [Google Scholar]
  48. Katrasnik, J.; Pernus, F.; Likar, B. A Survey of Mobile Robots for Distribution Power Line Inspection. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 485–493. [Google Scholar]
  49. Waleed, D.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Tariq, U.; El-Hag, A.H. Drone-based ceramic insulators condition monitoring. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 6007312. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, T.W.; Yin, H.; Ruan, Q.Q.; Han, J.D.; Qi, J.T.; Yong, Q.; Wang, Z.T.; Sun, Z.Q. Q. Overhead power line detection from UAV video images. In Proceedings of the 2012 19th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, M2VIP, Auckland, New Zealand, 28–30 November 2012; pp. 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ogan, R.T.; Lott, D.; Paden, W. Electrical transmission line inspection using unmanned aircraft. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Southeastcon, Huntsville, AL, USA, 11–14 April 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mbuli, N.; Mendu, B.; Seitshiro, M.; Pretorius, J.H.C. What outage attributes affect the frequencies of forced transformer outages in Eskom regions? Evidence from 2007–2016 data. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 474–482. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cacace, J.; Orozco-Soto, S.M.; Suarez, A.; Caballero, A.; Orsag, M.; Bogdan, S.; Vasiljevic, G.; Ebeid, E.; Rodriguez, J.A.A.; Ollero, A. Safe local aerial manipulation for the installation of devices on power lines: AERIAL-CORE first year results and designs. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gazzea, M.; Pacevicius, M.; Dammann, D.O.; Sapronova, A.; Lunde, T.M.; Arghandeh, R. Automated power lines vegetation monitoring using high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2022, 37, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, W.; Ning, Y.; Suo, C. A method based on multi-sensor data fusion for UAV safety distance diagnosis. Electronics 2019, 8, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wing, I.S.; Rose, A. Economic Consequence Analysis of Electric Power Infrastructure Disruptions: An Analytical General Equilibrium Approach. Energy Econom. 2020, 89, 104756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. LaCommare, K.; Eto, J. Understanding the cost of power interruptions to U.S. electricity consumers. Econ. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2004, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  58. Tedeschi, P.; Oligeri, G.; Di Pietro, R. Leveraging jamming to help drones complete their mission. Ad. Hoc. Netw. 2020, 8, 5049–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Caballero, A.; Paneque, J.L.; Martinez-de-Dios, J.R.; Maza, I.; Ollero, A. Multi-UAV systems for inspection of industrial and public infrastructures. In Infrastructure Robotics: Methodologies, Robotic Systems and Applications; Liu, D., Balaguer, C., Dissanayake, G., Kovac, M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Subahani, A.M.; Kathiresh, M.; Sanjeev, S. Transmission Line Inspection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. In Role of Edge Analytics in Sustainable Smart City Development; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ahmed, M.F.; Mohanta, J.C.; Sanyal, A.; Yadav, P.S. Path planning of unmanned aerial systems for visual inspection of power transmission lines and towers. IETE J. Res. 2024, 70, 3259–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xu, B.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, T.; Chen, Q. Development of power transmission line detection technology based on unmanned aerial vehicle image vision. SN Appl. Sci. 2023, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zormpas, A.; Moirogiorgou, K.; Kalaitzakis, K.; Plokamakis, G.A.; Partsinevelos, P.; Giakos, G.C.; Zervakis, M.E. Power Transmission Lines Inspection using Properly Equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), Krakow Poland, 16–18 October 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Causa, F.; Asciolla, M.; Opromolla, R.; Molina, P.; Mennella, A.; Nisi, M.; Fasano, G. UAV-based LiDAR mapping with Galileo-GPS PPP processing and cooperative navigation. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21–24 June 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 938–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fasano, G.; Causa, F.; Opromolla, R.; Asciolla, M.; Nisi, M.; Pozzoli, L.; Muscinelli, R. AMPERE: Exploiting Galileo for electrical asset mapping in emerging countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace), Naples, Italy, 23–25 June 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Takaya, K.; Ohta, H.; Shibayama, K.; Inoue, A.; Kroumov, V. Construction of power line inspection system using a quadrotor helicopter. IEEE J. Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2024, 19, 1803–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rafanavičius, V.; Cimmperman, P.; Taluntis, V.; Man, K.L.; Volkvicius, G.; Jurkynas, M.; Bezaras, J. Efficient Path Planning Methods for UAVs Inspecting Power Lines. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), Busan, South Korea, 13–15 February 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Santos, T.; Moreira, M.; Almeida, J.M.; Dias, A.; Martins, A.; Dinis, J.; Formiga, J.; da Silva, E.P. PLineD: Vision-based power lines detection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In Proceedings of the ICARSC 2017- International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, Coimbra, Portugal, 26–28 April 2017; pp. 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. İnce, E. Transmission line inspection with UAVs: A review of technologies, applications, and challenges. Int. J. Energy Smart Grid 2024, 9, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jordan, S.; Moore, J.; Hovet, S.E.; Box, J.; Perry, J.; Kirsche, K.; Lewis, D.; Tse, Z.T.H. State-of-the-art technologies for UAV inspections. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 2018, 12, 151–164. [Google Scholar]
  71. Deng, C.; Wang, S.; Huang, Z.; Tan, Z.; Liu, J. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Power Line Inspection: A Cooperative Way in Platforms and Communications. J. Commun. 2014, 9, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fj, F.; Meganathan, L.; Esha, M.; Thao, N.G.M.; Doss, A.S.A. Power Transmission Line Inspection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle—A Review. In Proceedings of the 2023 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT 2023), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 8–10 December 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, W. Unmanned aerial vehicle for transmission line inspection: Status, standardization, and perspectives. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 713634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alhassan, A.B.; Zhang, X.; Shen, H.; Xu, H. Power transmission line inspection robots: A review, trends and challenges for future research. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 118, 105862. [Google Scholar]
  75. Yang, L.; Fan, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, E.; Peng, J.; Liang, Z. A Review on State-of-the-Art Power Line Inspection Techniques. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 9350–9365. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Othman, N.Q.H.; Li, Y.; Alsharif, M.H.; Khan, M.A. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends. Intell. Serv. Robot. 2023, 16, 109–137. [Google Scholar]
  77. Chamola, V.; Kotesh, P.; Agarwal, A.; Naren; Gupta, N.; Guizani, M. A Comprehensive Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks and Neutralization Techniques. Ad. Hoc. Netw. 2021, 111, 102324. [Google Scholar]
  78. Foudeh, H.A.; Luk, P.C.-K.; Whidborne, J.F. An Advanced Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Approach via Learning-Based Control for Overhead Power Line Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 130410–130433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Williams, M.; Jones, D.I.; Earp, G.K. Obstacle avoidance during aerial inspection of power lines. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 2001, 73, 472–479. [Google Scholar]
  80. Martins, W.M.; Filho AJ, D.; de Jesus, L.D.; Souza, A.D.; Ramos, A.B.; Pimenta, T. Tracking for inspection in energy transmission power lines using unmanned aerial vehicles: A systematic review of current and specific literature. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 2020, 9, 233–243. [Google Scholar]
  81. Surantha, N.; Iwao, T.; Ren, Z.; Morishita, H. Digital Transformation on Power Transmission Line Inspection using Autonomous Drone and Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Artificial Intelligence (RAAI), Singapore, 9–11 December 2022; pp. 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu, X.; Miao, X.; Jiang, H.; Chen, J. Data analysis in visual power line inspection: An in-depth review of deep learning for component detection and fault diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Control 2020, 50, 253–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, X.; Miao, X.; Jiang, H.; Chen, J. Review of data analysis in vision inspection of power lines with an in-depth discussion of deep learning technology. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.09802. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sun, S.; Liu, Y.; Yi, Z.; Wang, K.; Yu, P.; Zhao, K.; Yang, T. Review of autonomous inspection technology for power lines using UAVs. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Mechatronics Technology (ICEEMT), Qingdao, China, 2–4 July 2021; pp. 481–484. [Google Scholar]
  85. Nguyen, V.N.; Jenssen, R.; Roverso, D. Automatic autonomous vision-based power line inspection: A review of current status and the potential role of deep learning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 99, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gonçalves, R.; De Oliveira, M.; Rocioli, M.; Souza, F.C.; Gallo, C.; Sudbrack DE, T.; Trautmann, P.V.; Clasen, B.C.; Homma, R. Drone–Robot to Clean Power Line Insulators. Sensors 2023, 23, 5529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ellis, N. Inspection of Power Transmission Lines Using UAVs. Univ. S. Queensland Fac. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia, 2013; pp. 1–87. [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang, Z.; Gao, Q.; Xu, J.; Li, D. A Review of UAV Power Line Inspection. In Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 3147–3159. [Google Scholar]
  89. Fahmani, L.; Benhadou, S.; Medromi, H. The State-of-the-Art of Safe Fly Zone for a Power Transmission Lines Inspection UAV. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2022, 455, 571–578. [Google Scholar]
  90. Elmeseiry, N.; Alshaer, N.; Ismail, T. A Detailed Survey and Future Directions of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with Potential Applications. Aerospace 2021, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Aber, J.S.; Marzolff, I.; Ries, J.B.; Aber, S.E.W. Unmanned Aerial Systems. In Small-Format Aerial Photography and UAS Imagery: Principles, Techniques and Geoscience Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 119–139. [Google Scholar]
  92. Malle, N.H.; Nyboe, F.F.; Ebeid, E. Survey and evaluation of sensors for overhead cable detection using UAVs. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Athens, Greece, 15–18 June 2021; pp. 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  93. Aminifar, F.; Rahmatian, F. Unmanned aerial vehicles in modern power systems. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2020, 8, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Du, W.; Niu, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y. An Analysis Model of Helicopter and UAV in Overhead Powerline Inspection. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. 2018, 189, 062056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nobuhiro, K.; Tsutsumi, N.; Teshigawara, T.; Ota, D.; Miyoshi, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Minoura, F.; Tomonori, S.; Tsuyoshi, C.; Piwowarczyk, W.; et al. Autonomous Drone System Development for Power Transmission Line Inspections. In Proceedings of the 9th IIAE International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering 2021, Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–30 March 2021; pp. 172–176. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang, Z.; Chen, G.; Huang, C.; Hu, Q. Grid Industry Based Intelligent Ground Monitoring System of UAV Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2022 Global Conference on Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology (GCRAIT), Chicago, IL, USA, 30–31 July 2022; pp. 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  97. Rafique, S.F.; Bodla, M.K.; Ahmed, Z.; Nasir, U.; Zaidi, A.; Saleem, M. Design and implementation of a UAV for power system utility inspection. In Proceedings of the 2014 16th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference and Exposition, Antalya, Turkey, 21–24 September 2014; pp. 1146–1150. [Google Scholar]
  98. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Suzuki, S.; Namiki, A.; Wang, W. Design and Application of a UAV Autonomous Inspection System for High-Voltage Power Transmission Lines. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abubakar, A.; Farah, M.; Alsheikh, M.; Saif, A.-W.A. Optimal altitude range for image collection drone from agricultural areas with image resolution and power consumption constraints. In Proceedings of the 2023 20th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Mahdia, Tunisia, 20–23 February 2023; pp. 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Leva, S.; Aghaei, M.; Grimaccia, F. PV power plant inspection by UAS: Correlation between altitude and detection of defects on PV modules. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Rome, Italy, 10–13 June 2015; pp. 1921–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aghaei, M.; Dolara, A.; Leva, S.; Grimaccia, F. Image resolution and defects detection in PV inspection by unmanned technologies. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Boston, MA, USA, 17–21 July 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Komar, G.; Pischler, O.; Schichler, U.; Vieriu, R.L.; Birchbauer, J.A. Automatic UAV-based inspection of overhead lines and substations: Beyond visible spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD), Phuket, Thailand, 25–28 October 2020; pp. 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Fang, Y.; Chen, S. UAV low altitude photogrammetry for power line inspection. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Montambault, S.; Beaudry, J.; Toussaint, K.; Pouliot, N. On the application of VTOL UAVs to the inspection of power utility assets. In Proceedings of the 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI), Montreal, QC, Canada, 5–7 October 2010; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. He, Y.; Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Fang, Y.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z. UAV-based sensing and imaging technologies for power system detection, monitoring, and inspection: A review. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 2024, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  106. Bearman, M.; Smith C., D.; Carbone, A.; Slade, S.; Baik, C.; Hughes-Warrington, M.; Neumann D., L. Systematic review methodology in higher education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2012, 31, 625–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Torres-Carrión, P.; González-González, C.; Aciar, S.; Morale G., R. Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 17–20 April 2018; pp. 1364–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. García-Peñalvo, F. Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 2022, 23, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  109. Ferreras-Fernández, T.; Rodero H., M.; García-Peñalvo, F.; José, A. The systematic review of literature in LIS: An approach. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, 2–4 November 2016; pp. 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  110. Sutton, A.; Jones D., R.; Abrams, K.; Sheldon, T.; Song, F. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Structured Review of the Methodological Literature. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 1999, 4, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bie, R. Methodology of systematic reviews: An introduction. Phys. Ther. Rev. 1996, 1, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pati, D.; Lorusso L., N. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environ. Res. Des. 2018, 11, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang, S.; Chen, B.; Wang, R.; Wang, J.; Zhong, L.; Gao, B. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Vision-based Detection of Power Line Poles by CPU-based Deep Learning Method. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 9th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Suzhou, China, 29 July–2 August 2019; pp. 1630–1634. [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang, R.; Zhang, S.; Chen, B.; Xu, J.; Zhong, L. Unmanned aerial vehicle UAV vision-based detection and location of power towers for transmission line maintenance. In Proceedings of the IET Conference Proceeding, Liverpool, UK, 9–12 March 2020; pp. 1937–1941. [Google Scholar]
  115. Azevedo, F.; Dias, A.; Almeida, J.; Oliveira, A.; Ferreira, A.; Santos, T.; Martins, A.; Silva, E. LiDAR-based real-time detection and modeling of power lines for unmanned aerial vehicles. Sensors 2019, 19, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fang, S.; Sheng, L.; Xiaoyu, W. Detection method of transmission line broken stock defects in aircraft inspection based on image processing technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chongqing, China, 12–14 June 2020; pp. 1715–1719. [Google Scholar]
  117. Solilo, M.; Doorsamy, W.; Paul, B.S. UAV Power Line Detection and Tracking using a Color Transformation. Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa, 9–10 December 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  118. Xu, L.; Adebo, K.; Zhao, J.; Miao, L. Distributed Drones for Power Line Inspection with Weighted Consensus Control in Dynamic Network Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 3rd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Beijing, China, 7–9 September 2019; pp. 2049–2054. [Google Scholar]
  119. Li, H.; Dong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ai, J. Design and Implementation of UAVs for Bird’s Nest Inspection on Transmission Lines Based on Deep Learning. Drones 2022, 6, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Akhmetov, Y.; Nurmanova, V.; Bagheri, M.; Zollanvari, A.; Phung, T. Overhead Line Insulator Type Classification Using YOLOv3 Architectures. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computing, Networking, Telecommunications & Engineering Sciences Applications (CoNTESA), Kodaikanal, India, 15–16 December 2022; pp. 36–40. [Google Scholar]
  121. Liu, K.; Zhong, L. Object detection of UAV power line inspection images based on federated learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 5th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Nanjing, China, 27–29 May 2022; pp. 2372–2377. [Google Scholar]
  122. Korki, M.; Shankar, N.D.; Shah, R.N.; Waseem, S.M.; Hodges, S. Automatic Fault Detection of Power Lines using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). In Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems-Oman (UVS), Muscat, Oman, 5–7 February 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  123. Dai, Z.; Yi, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Huang, X.; Ma, C. CODNet: A Center and Orientation Detection Network for Power Line Following Navigation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022, 19, 8014805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Fang, S.; Haiyang, C.; Sheng, L.; Xiaoyu, W. A Framework of Power Pylon Detection for UAV-based Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China, 12–14 June 2020; pp. 350–357. [Google Scholar]
  125. Han, G.; Wang, R.; Yuan, Q.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, M.; He, M.; Qin, L. Typical Fault Detection on Drone Images of Transmission Lines Based on Lightweight Structure and Feature-Balanced Network. Drones 2023, 7, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Luo, C.; Miao, Q. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Data Anomaly Detection and Recovery Prediction Based on Spatio-Temporal Correlation. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2022, 71, 457–468. [Google Scholar]
  127. Xing, J.; Cioffi, G.; Hidalgo-Carrio, J.; Scaramuzza, D. Autonomous Power Line Inspection with Drones via Perception-Aware MPC. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Detroit, MI, USA, 1–5 October 2023; pp. 1086–1093. [Google Scholar]
  128. Shuang, F.; Han, S.; Li, Y.; Lu, T. RSIn-Dataset: An UAV-Based Insulator Detection Aerial Images Dataset and Benchmark. Drones 2023, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, Y.; Qian, Q.; Duan, H.; Min, X.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, X. Boosting power line inspection in bad weather: Removing weather noise with channel-spatial attention-based UNet. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 88429–88445. [Google Scholar]
  130. Hoang, V.D.; Ebeid, E. Advanced Magnetic Energy Harvester for Charging Drones from Overhead Powerlines. In Proceedings of the 2023 25th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’23 ECCE Europe), Aalborg, Denmark, 4–8 September 2023; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  131. Ding, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y. Electric power line patrol operation based on vision and laser SLAM fusion perception. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Automation, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (AUTEEE), Shenyang, China, 19–21 November 2021; pp. 125–129. [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang, M.; Lei, Y.; Liang, Y.; Lv, X.; Mo, W. AGI-Fedavg: A UAV Power Line Inspection Algorithm Based on Federated Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Changsha, China, 20–22 October 2021; pp. 1030–1034. [Google Scholar]
  133. Demkiv, L.; Ruffo, M.; Silano, G.; Bednar, J.; Saska, M. An Application of Stereo Thermal Vision for Preliminary Inspection of Electrical Power Lines by MAVs. In Proceedings of the 1 st AIRPHARO Workshop on Aerial Robotic Systems Physically Interacting with the Environment, Biograd na Moru, Croatia, 4–5 October 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  134. Zheng, X.; Jia, R.; Aisikaer; Gong, L.; Zhang, G.; Dang, J. Component identification and defect detection in transmission lines based on deep learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2021, 40, 3147–3158. [Google Scholar]
  135. Siddiqui, Z.A.; Park, U. A Drone Based Transmission Line Components Inspection System with Deep Learning Technique. Energies 2020, 35, 3348. [Google Scholar]
  136. Li, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ji, Z. Automated deep learning system for power line inspection image analysis and processing: Architecture and design issues. Glob. Energy Interconnect. 2023, 6, 614–633. [Google Scholar]
  137. Vemula, S.; Frye, M. Mask R-CNN Powerline Detector: A Deep Learning approach with applications to a UAV. In Proceedings of the 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Online, 11–15 October 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  138. Liang, C.; Yin, Y.; Qin, Y.; He, X. A Deblurring Method of Electric Power Inspection Images Based on GAN. In Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), Guiyang, China, 12–14 July 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  139. Song, J.; Qian, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J. Automatic Extraction of Power Lines from Aerial Images of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Mei, X. Insulator self-shattering detection: A deep convolutional neural network approach. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 10097–10112. [Google Scholar]
  141. Pienroj, P.; Schonborn, S.; Birke, R. Exploring Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Powerline Tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Paris, France, 29 April–2 May 2019; pp. 496–501. [Google Scholar]
  142. Ayoub, N.; Schneider-Kamp, P. Real-Time On-Board Deep Learning Fault Detection for Autonomous UAV Inspections. Electronics 2021, 10, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. He, K.; Zhou, Q.; Shen, Y.; Gao, J.; Shuai, Z. Spatiotemporal Precise Routing Strategy for Multi-UAV-Based Power Line Inspection Using Hybrid Network of FANET and Satellite Internet. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE IAS Industrial and Commercial Power System Asia (IEEE I&CPS Asia 2023), Chongqing, China, 7–9 July 2023; pp. 1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
  144. Han, G.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Zhao, L.; Liu, K.; Qin, L. A Lightweight Aerial Power Line Segmentation Algorithm Based on Attention Mechanism. Machines 2022, 10, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zheng, X.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, X.; Mu, C. Path planning of power line inspection based on DDPG for obstacle avoidance with UAV. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 6th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Hefei, China, 12–14 May 2023; pp. 2919–2923. [Google Scholar]
  146. Hamelin, P.; Miralles, F.; Lambert, G.; Lavoie, S.; Pouliot, N.; Montfrond, M.; Montambault, S. Discrete-time control of LineDrone: An assisted tracking and landing UAV for live power line inspection and maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Atlanta, GA, USA, 11–14 June 2019; pp. 292–298. [Google Scholar]
  147. Shen, H.; Jiang, Y.; Deng, F.; Shan, Y. Task Unloading Strategy of Multi UAV for Transmission Line Inspection Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. Electronics 2022, 11, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kyuroson, A.; Koval, A.; Nikolakopoulos, G. Autonomous Point Cloud Segmentation for Power Lines Inspection in Smart Grid. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2023, 56, 11754–11761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Titov, E.; Limanovskaya, O.; Lemekh, A.; Volkova, D. The Deep Learning Based Power Line Defect Detection System Built on Data Collected by the Cablewalker Drone. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON), Novosibirsk, Russia, 21–27 October 2019; pp. 700–704. [Google Scholar]
  150. An, D.; Chao, J.; Li, T.; Fang, L. WaveGNet: Wavelet-Guided Deep Learning for Efficient Aerial Power Line Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 24, 22037–22044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, R.; Xie, W.; Chen, B.; Wu, W.; Zhu, L. A Quality Evaluation Method of UAV Inspection Images Based on Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 7th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing China, 15–17 September 2023; pp. 2272–2276. [Google Scholar]
  152. Silano, G.; Baca, T.; Penicka, R.; Liuzza, D.; Saska, M. Power Line Inspection Tasks with Multi-Aerial Robot Systems Via Signal Temporal Logic Specifications. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021, 6, 4169–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Rad, S.S.; Kheirollahi, R.; Zhao, S.; Mostafa, A.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Friedman, G.; Lu, F. Experimental Study of Magnetic Field Effect on Multi-Rotor Drones Operation in Autonomous Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA, 21–23 June 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  154. Mostafa, A.; Wang, Y.; Friedman, G.; Zhang, H.; Lu, F. Challenges in UAS Platform Design for Transmission Line Monitoring and Inspections. In Proceedings of the IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), Brussels, Belgium, 17–20 October 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  155. Rad, S.S.; Kheirollahi, R.; Mostafa, A.; Zheng, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Friedman, G.; Lu, F. Development and Testing of 10 kV/60Hz Modular Transformer to Study Strong Electric Field Impacts on Drones in Power Line Inspection Applications. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA, 21–23 June 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  156. Duan, S.; Lu, X.; Wu, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, G. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wireless Power Transfer System for Long-Distance Transmission Line Patrol. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Power Electronics and Application Conference and Exposition (PEAC), Guangzhou, China, 4–7 November 2022; pp. 1324–1329. [Google Scholar]
  157. Skriver, M.; Stengaard, A.; Schultz, U.P.; Ebeid, E. Experimental Investigation of EMC Weaknesses in UAVs During Overhead Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21–24 June 2022; pp. 626–635. [Google Scholar]
  158. Cesoni, R.; Fantin, G.; Spadini, G.; Tonelli, F.; Sun, T.; Buratti, F. Experimental Tests on Electromagnetic Compatibility of a UAV in the Proximity of High Voltage Power Lines. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on Live Maintenance (ICOLIM), Turin, Italy, 15–17 June 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  159. Ye, J.; Pan, E.; Xu, W. Digital Video Stabilization Method Based on Periodic Jitters of Airborne Vision of Large Flapping Wing Robots. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2023, 34, 2591–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, W. A Flexible Towed Aerial Robot System for Stable X-ray Inspection of Power Lines. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Koh Samui, Thailand, 4–9 December 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  161. Wang, Y.; Paul, H.; Miyazaki, R.; Rosales Martinez, R.; Kominami, T.; Ladig, R.; Shimonomura, K. Active Translatory Drive System with Docking Capability for UAV Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Sapporo, Japan, 11–15 July 2022; pp. 689–694. [Google Scholar]
  162. Wang, H.; Li, E.; Yang, G.; Guo, R. Design of an Inspection Robot System with Hybrid Operation Modes for Power Transmission Lines. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Tianjin, China, 4–7 August 2019; pp. 2571–2576. [Google Scholar]
  163. Damigos, G.; Lindgren, T.; Sandberg, S.; Nikolakopoulos, G. Performance of Sensor Data Process Offloading on 5G-Enabled UAVs. Sensors 2023, 23, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cantieri, A.R.; Wehrmeister, M.A.; Oliveira, A.S.; Lima, J.; Ferraz, M.; Szekir, G. Proposal of an Augmented Reality Tag UAV Positioning System for Power Line Tower Inspection. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 1, 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  165. Liu, Z.; Miao, X.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, H.; Chen, J. Power Tower Inspection Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Monocular Semantic Positioning Approach for UAV Transmission Tower Inspection. Sensors 2022, 22, 7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Sun, C.; Liu, M.; Liu, C.; Feng, X.; Wu, H. An Industrial Quadrotor UAV Control Method Based on Fuzzy Adaptive Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control. Electronics 2021, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Pan, G.; Lei, H.; An, J.; Zhang, S.; Alouini, M.-S. On the Secrecy of UAV Systems with Linear Trajectory. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 2020, 19, 6277–6288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Calvo, A.; Silano, G.; Capitan, J. Mission Planning and Execution in Heterogeneous Teams of Aerial Robots Supporting Power Line Inspection Operations. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21–24 June 2022; pp. 1644–1649. [Google Scholar]
  169. Silano, G.; Bednar, J.; Nascimento, T.; Capitan, J.; Saska, M.; Ollero, A. A Multi-Layer Software Architecture for Aerial Cognitive Multi-Robot Systems in Power Line Inspection Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ICUAS’21, Athens, Greece, 15–18 June 2021; pp. 1624–1629. [Google Scholar]
  170. Wang, J. Autonomous Localization and Navigation for Transmission Line Inspection of UAV. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA), Dalian, China, 27–28 August 2021; pp. 98–104. [Google Scholar]
  171. Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, P.; Ning, Y.; Suo, C. A Method for Autonomous Navigation and Positioning of UAV Based on Electric Field Array Detection. Sensors 2021, 21, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Savva, A.; Zacharia, A.; Makrigiorgis, R.; Anastasiou, A.; Kyrkou, C.; Kolios, P.; Panayiotou, C.; Theocharides, T. ICARUS: Automatic Autonomous Power Infrastructure Inspection with UAVs. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ICUAS’21, Athens, Greece, 15–18 June 2021; pp. 918–926. [Google Scholar]
  173. Takaya, K.; Ohta, H.; Kroumov, V.; Shibayama, K.; Nakamura, M. Development of UAV System for Autonomous Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania, 9–11 October 2019; pp. 762–767. [Google Scholar]
  174. Schofield, O.B.; Lorenzen, K.H.; Ebeid, E. Cloud to Cable: A Drone Framework for Autonomous Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 27th Euromicro Conference Series on Digital System Design (DSD), Paris, France, 28–30 August 2020; pp. 503–509. [Google Scholar]
  175. Iversen, N.; Schofield, O.B.; Cousin, L.; Ayoub, N.; Vom Bogel, G.; Ebeid, E. Design, Integration and Implementation of an Intelligent and Self-Recharging Drone System for Autonomous Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic, 27 September–1 October 2021; pp. 4168–4175. [Google Scholar]
  176. Lopez, R.L.; Sanchez MJ, B.; Jimenez, M.P.; Arrue, B.C.; Ollero, A. Autonomous UAV System for Cleaning Insulators in Power Line Inspection and Maintenance. Sensors 2021, 21, 8488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Alexiou, D.; Zampokas, G.; Skartados, E.; Tsiakas, K.; Kostavelis, I.; Giakoumis, D.; Gasteratos, A.; Tzovaras, D. Visual Navigation Based on Deep Semantic Cues for Real-Time Autonomous Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Warsaw, Poland, 6–9 June 2023; pp. 1262–1269. [Google Scholar]
  178. Perez-Jimenez, M.; Montes-Grova, M.A.; Ramon-Soria, P.; Arrue, B.C.; Ollero, A. POSITRON: Lightweight Active Positioning Compliant Joints Robotic Arm in Power Lines Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Athens, Greece, 1–4 September 2020; pp. 729–736. [Google Scholar]
  179. Zhao, N.; Huangfu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, Q. Consider No-Fly Zones and Calculate Unloading UAV Power Line Autonomous Patrol Track Planning Technology. Proc. SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2023, 12779, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  180. Cantieri, A.; Ferraz, M.; Szekir, G.; Teixeira, M.A.; Lima, J.; Oliveira, A.S.; Wehrmeister, M.A. Cooperative UAV-UGV Autonomous Power Pylon Inspection: An Investigation of Cooperative Outdoor Vehicle Positioning Architecture. Sensors 2020, 20, 6384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Moreno, J.A.; Ruiz, C.; Satue, A.; Acosta, J.A.; Ollero, A. Design, Development and Testing of a Hybrid Fixed-Flapping Wing UAV. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21–24 June 2022; pp. 329–338. [Google Scholar]
  182. Rangel, R.K.; Maitelli, A.L.; Rodrigues, V.A.; Valente, D.R.G. Smart Cities—Automatic Power Lines Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, USA, 5–12 March 2022; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  183. Tsellou, A.; Livanos, G.; Ramnalis, D.; Polychronos, V.; Plokamakis, G.; Zervakis, M.; Moirogiorgou, K. A UAV Intelligent System for Greek Power Lines Monitoring. Sensors 2023, 23, 8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Du, Q.; Dong, W.; Su, W.; Wang, Q. UAV Inspection Technology and Application of Transmission Line. In Proceedings of the 2022 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE), Zhuhai, China, 23–25 September 2022; pp. 594–597. [Google Scholar]
  185. Liu, W.; Liu, L.; He, G.; Li, P. Visualization of Power Corridor Based on UAV Line Inspection Data. Int. J. Wireless Inf. Netw. 2021, 28, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Medrano, P.; Villadangos, J.; Astrain, J.J. UAS: IoT On-Line Sensors for Power Line Inspection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Online, 25–28 October 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  187. Constantin, A.; Dinculescu, R.-N. UAV Development and Impact in the Power System. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), Jaipur, India, 20–22 December 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A conceptual overview of autonomous power line inspection [98].
Figure 1. A conceptual overview of autonomous power line inspection [98].
Drones 09 00265 g001
Figure 2. (a) Annual and cumulative publications overview and (b) the number of publications by area of application.
Figure 2. (a) Annual and cumulative publications overview and (b) the number of publications by area of application.
Drones 09 00265 g002
Figure 3. Network visualization of research topics related to UAV-based power line inspections.
Figure 3. Network visualization of research topics related to UAV-based power line inspections.
Drones 09 00265 g003
Figure 4. Overlay map visualization of research topics in UAV-based power line inspections (2019–2023).
Figure 4. Overlay map visualization of research topics in UAV-based power line inspections (2019–2023).
Drones 09 00265 g004
Table 1. Different classifications of UAV types and their areas of application.
Table 1. Different classifications of UAV types and their areas of application.
Ref. No.UAV TypeArea of Application
[16]Fixed-wing hybridMilitary and civil
[18,19,20,21,22,23]Fixed-wingMonitoring, mapping, agriculture, real estate, film and TV, oil and gas, construction, fisheries, wildlife surveillance, water management, security surveillance, reconnaissance in disaster, and power line inspections
[24,25,26,27,28,29]Single-rotorAgriculture, particularly for spraying fertilizers and pesticides
[31,32,33,34,35]MultirotorMilitary, delivery and shipping, rescue, search operations, forecasting weather, agriculture, entertainment, communication, video surveillance, defense, disaster management, surveillance, and construction industry
Table 2. Emerging technologies, learning algorithms, and associated developments in autonomous systems and data processing.
Table 2. Emerging technologies, learning algorithms, and associated developments in autonomous systems and data processing.
Ref. No.YearAuthorsRef. No.YearAuthors
4.2 Innovative Advancements in UAV-based Power Line Inspections
4.2.1 UAV-Based Approaches and Algorithms for Power Line Fault Detection and Inspection
[113]2019Zhang et al.[114]2020Wang et al.
[115]2019Azevedo et al.[116]2020Fang et al.
[117]2021Solilo et al.[118]2019Xu et al.
[119]2022Li et al.[120]2022Akhmetov et al.
[121]2019Liu and Zhong[122]2019Korki et al.
[123]2022Dai et al.[124]2020Fang et al.
[125]2023Han et al.[126]2022Zhong et al.
[127]2023Xing et al.[128]2023Shuang et al.
[129]2023Li et al.[130]2023Hoang and Ebeid
[131]2021Ding et al.[132]2021Wang et al.
[133]2021Demkiv et al.[134]2021Zheng et al.
[135]2020Siddiqui and Park[136]2023Li et al.
[137]2020Vemula and Frye[138]2023Liang et al.
[139]2022Song et al.[140]2019Yang et al.
[141]2019Pienroj et al.[142]2021Ayoub and Schneider-Kamp
[143]2023He et al.[144]2022Han et al.
[145]2023Zheng et al.[146]2019Hamelin et al.
[147]2022Shen et al.[148]2023Kyuroson et al.
[149]2019Titov et al.[150]2023An et al.
[151]2023Wang et al.
4.2.2 Challenges and Developments
[152]2021Silano et al.[153]2023Rad et al.
[154]2022Mostafa et al.[155]2023Rad et al.
[156]2022Duan et al.[157]2022Skriver et al.
[158]2022Cesoni et al.
4.2.3 Robotic Vision and UAV Innovations
[159]2023Ye et al.[160]2023Wang et al.
[161]2022Wang et al.[162]2019Wang et al.
[163]2023Damigos et al.[164]2020Cantieri et al.
[165]2022Liu et al.[166]2021Sun et al.
[167]2020Pan et al.[168]2022Calvo et al.
[169]2021Silano et al.
4.2.4 UAV Technologies for Autonomous
[170]2021Wang[171]2021Li et al.
[172]2021Savva et al.[173]2019Takaya et al.
[174]2020Schofield et al.[175]2021Iversen et al.
[176]2021Lopez et al.[177]2023Alexiou et al.
[178]2020Perez-Jimenez et al.[179]2023Zhao et al.
[180]2020Cantieri et al.
4.2.5 AI-Driven UAV Systems
[181]2022Moreno et al.[182]2022Rangel et al.
[183]2023Tsellou et al.[184]2022Du et al.
[185]2021Liu et al.[186]2020Medrano et al.
[187]2019Constantin and Dinculescu
Table 3. Top 10 most cited journals and conference proceedings in the field.
Table 3. Top 10 most cited journals and conference proceedings in the field.
Journal and Conference TitlesTotal Citations
Sensors134
Energies35
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems35
Electronics63
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters31
2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing, ICSTCC 2019—Proceedings27
2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ICUAS 201925
AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference—Proceedings25
Multimedia Tools and Applications20
IEEE Transactions on Reliability20
Table 4. Top 10 most cited publications in the field.
Table 4. Top 10 most cited publications in the field.
AuthorsTitleYearCited by
Azevedo et al. [115]LiDAR-based real-time detection and modeling of power lines for unmanned aerial vehicles201956
Siddiqui and Park [135]A Drone Based Transmission Line Components Inspection System with Deep Learning Technique202035
Iversen et al. [175]Design, Integration and Implementation of an Intelligent and Self-recharging Drone System for Autonomous Power line Inspection202135
Sun et al. [166]An industrial quadrotor uav control method based on fuzzy adaptive linear active disturbance rejection control202132
Silano et al. [152]Power Line Inspection Tasks with Multi-Aerial Robot Systems Via Signal Temporal Logic Specifications202131
Takaya et al. [173]Development of UAV system for autonomous power line inspection201927
Ayoub and Schneider-Kamp [142]Real-time on-board deep learning fault detection for autonomous UAV inspections202126
Hamelin et al. [146]Discrete-time control of LineDrone: An assisted tracking and landing UAV for live power line inspection and maintenance201925
Vemula and Frye [137]Mask R-CNN powerline detector: A deep learning approach with applications to a UAV202025
Cantieri et al. [180]Cooperative uav–ugv autonomous power pylon inspection: An investigation of cooperative outdoor vehicle positioning architecture202023
Table 5. Clusters of keywords, total link strength, and occurrences.
Table 5. Clusters of keywords, total link strength, and occurrences.
DescriptionKeywordsTotal Link StrengthOccurrences
Cluster 1 (Red): 13 Keywordsaircraft detection20829
convolutional neural networks496
deep learning15221
defects374
fault detection366
image processing637
inspection methods213
learning systems636
line detection344
manual inspection334
neural networks243
power line detection394
signal detection273
Cluster 2 (Green): 12 Keywordsair navigation334
cameras315
data handling193
electric power transmission networks13918
image enhancement254
inspection26638
inspection image414
power517
power line inspections31954
power lines25239
transmission line8411
vehicle transmissions506
Cluster 3 (Blue): 9 Keywordsantennas29644
flight control systems245
image segmentation254
inspection and maintenance173
maintenance274
mapping183
robotics347
semantic segmentation507
unmanned aerial vehicles 39667
Cluster 4 (Yellow): 6 Keywordsaerial vehicle8410
deep reinforcement learning173
inspection process223
inspection tasks253
learning algorithms365
reinforcement learning233
Cluster 5 (Purple): 4 Keywordsobject recognition405
object detection546
outages193
power supply company273
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mendu, B.; Mbuli, N. State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Power Line Inspections: Current Innovations, Trends, and Future Prospects. Drones 2025, 9, 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040265

AMA Style

Mendu B, Mbuli N. State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Power Line Inspections: Current Innovations, Trends, and Future Prospects. Drones. 2025; 9(4):265. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mendu, Bongumsa, and Nhlanhla Mbuli. 2025. "State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Power Line Inspections: Current Innovations, Trends, and Future Prospects" Drones 9, no. 4: 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040265

APA Style

Mendu, B., & Mbuli, N. (2025). State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Power Line Inspections: Current Innovations, Trends, and Future Prospects. Drones, 9(4), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040265

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop