Next Article in Journal
Exploring a Novel Material and Approach in 3D-Printed Wrist-Hand Orthoses
Previous Article in Journal
On the Influence of Wave-Shaped Tool Path Strategies on Geometric Accuracy in Incremental Sheet Forming
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Thermo-Structural Analysis of Die-Sinking Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) of a Haynes-25 Super Alloy Using Deep-Learning-Based Methodologies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Cemented Carbide End-Mill Edge Preparation Using Dry-Electropolishing

by
Guiomar Riu-Perdrix
1,2,*,
Andrea Valencia-Cadena
1,
Luis Llanes
2 and
Joan Josep Roa
1
1
Steros GPA Innovative S.L., 08030 Barcelona, Spain
2
Center for Structural Integrity, Reliability and Micromechanics of Materials (CIEFMA), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Campus Diagonal Besos (EEBE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech, 08019 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8010028
Submission received: 10 January 2024 / Revised: 28 January 2024 / Accepted: 1 February 2024 / Published: 3 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metal Cutting and Cutting Tools)

Abstract

:
Precision edge preparation techniques for cemented carbides enable optimization of the geometry of tools’ cutting edges. These techniques are frequently used in high-stress environments, resulting in substantial improvements in tools’ cutting performance. This investigation examined the impact and evolution of cutting edge parameters and resulting surface finishes as a function of dry-electropolishing time on an end-mill. Findings demonstrate enlargement of the cutting edge radius, a decrease in surface roughness, and the mitigation of defects induced during previous manufacturing stages (i.e., smashed ceramic particles, burrs, chipping, etc.). Additionally, a direct correlation between dry-electropolishing time and primary cutting edges’ micro-geometry parameters has been established.

1. Introduction

Cemented carbides are composite materials consisting of hard carbide particles embedded in a tough metallic binder phase. Due to their remarkable combination of hardness, wear resistance, and toughness, they have become the primary material choice for extreme applications as tools and components in diverse industries, including machining, drilling, and mining [1]. In general, a grinding process is performed after sintering to achieve the necessary macro-geometry [2]. However, the resulting surface quality usually does not meet final micro-geometry or mechanical requirements, which are critical for cutting tools. Hence, further finishing operations on these tools are mandatory, particularly regarding their cutting edges, in order to improve their performance and extend their service life.
Generally, post-grinding finish operations not only optimize the shape and size of a cutting edge, but also increase the wear resistance of a tool [3,4] by reducing pre-existing defects and enhancing both its mechanical [5] and adhesion strength in the case of coated tools [6]. In addition, higher edge quality lessens the stress concentration between the tool and the workpiece, resulting in a uniform distribution of loads. This slows a cutting edge’s wear [7], chipping formation during cutting [8], and the temperature achieved [9]. Moreover, cutting edge preparation is used to minimize compressive residual stresses, providing a smooth surface for post-coating the desired end-mills [6].
However, it is well known that radius parameter is not enough to characterize the micro-geometry of a cutting tool. In that sense, the K-factor, which is defined as the ratio between rake and clearance surfaces (Sγ/Sα), plays an important role [5]. The K-factor dictates the micro-geometry of a cutting tool, with three options available: symmetric, waterfall, and reverse waterfall (also referred to as trumpet), depending on whether K is equal to, less than, or greater than one, respectively [10].
Over the past decade, numerous investigations have addressed the influence of a cutting edge’s micro-geometry on tool wear and its thermo-mechanical load under service-like working conditions [5,11,12]. However, information regarding the direct effect of the K-factor form on end-mills is scarce, and is somehow limited to tool life maps, also known as Taylor lines. Furthermore, the highest tool lifespans reported were found for K-factor values higher or lower than one, depending on whether the material machined by the hardmetal tool was Inconel 718 or a Ti-alloy, respectively [11]. Contrary to these findings, Denkena et al. [5] reported that the durability of cemented carbide tools when machining AISI 1045 is not dependent on the K-factor. Additionally, cemented carbide inserts show increased durability when exposed to static or dynamic thermo-mechanical loads, with cutting edge K-factors of approximately < 1 and >1, respectively [11].
Numerous advanced preparation methods have been developed to perform chamfering, honing, and radius modification, such as electrical discharge machining, laser machining, magneto abrasive machining, abrasive jet machining, brushing, and drag finishing. However, the last three methods are the most commonly used techniques in the cemented carbides industry [3,5,7]. These techniques aim to reach an optimal cutting edge radius and minimize detrimental effects like edge chipping, high cutting forces, and poor surface finish, while simultaneously enhancing chip evacuation and reducing tool wear [5,7,13,14]. However, although these techniques allow modification of the micro-geometry of tools, they also present specific limitations. Abrasive jet machining removes the metallic cobalt (Co) binder from the surface, decreasing tools’ mechanical integrity [15]. Brushing is limited to producing edge rounding for complex geometries, and it results in elevated temperatures during the conditioning process [9]. Drag finishing is more time-consuming than previous methods, depending on the desired radius. Furthermore, the sizes of abrasive particles pose limitations for small geometries, and are less flexible, as the entire piece is submerged in the abrasive [5].
Based on the above ideas, research regarding new technologies to address preparation challenges associated with cutting edges is required. Therefore, this study examined the dry-electropolishing technique to fulfil all requirements related to cutting edges’ preparation to enhance the lifetime of cutting tools. This method is based on ion exchange resins interacting with roughness peaks [16]. On cemented carbide materials, this effective polishing action takes place particularly at the cutting edge, where selective roughness is removed until the desired radius is attained, while compressive residual stresses produced during the machining process are preserved [16]. In this sense, the technology employed removes only the minimum amount of material by interacting solely with roughness peaks. This results in a cost-saving advantage compared to existing industrial methods because it preserves the tolerances of the workpiece as well as maintains the stress field induced during the pre-processing stage. Additionally, the resulting microstructure is free of corrosion, reaching a nearly flat surface between constitutive phases.
This research aimed to develop a preparation protocol for cutting edges, taking into account key micro-geometry parameters and characterizing the evolution of defects located at cutting edges as a function of dry-electropolishing time.

2. Materials and Methods

This investigation was conducted on an end-mill made of WC-Co cemented carbide material with 6 wt. % of a metallic Co binder and a fine microstructure. The final shape, geometry, and tolerances of the entire end-mill were obtained by applying a grinding process after sintering. Grinding was carried out using a commercial diamond grinding wheel. Coolant was used to prevent heat generation.
The end-mill was dry-electropolished (using DryLyte® Technology, Steros GPA Innovative, Barcelona, Spain) with a commercial electrolyte. Further and detailed information can be found in [16]. The end-mill was processed to a maximum of 30 min. Two different time sets of dry-electropolishing time were utilized until the maximum investigated time was reached: (1) initially ranging from 0 to 120 s, every 30 s, to assess the efficiency of the dry-electropolishing process in its early stages, and (2) subsequently at 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min to monitor how geometrical and microstructural parameters evolved as a function of time.
The initial end-mill was evaluated in terms of macro- and micro-geometry, radius (r), and surface average roughness (Ra) parameters (Table 1). In doing so, these initial cutting edges’ parameters and roughness values, as well as their evolution at each polishing stage, were assessed using a focus variation laser scanning microscope (LSM) (EdgeMaster X module—Bruker Alicona, Gratz, Austria). The Ra of the clearance was obtained in accordance with ISO 4287 (cut-off = 0.25 mm).
To better understand the main cutting parameters, a 3D reconstruction of the end-mill and a schematic representation of the micro-geometry of the cutting edge’s profile (accomplished using an InfiniteFocus G5 plus—Bruker Alicona, Gratz, Austria) are presented in Figure 1a,b, respectively. To obtain statistical significance, 3D measurements were conducted on multiple profiles with 50 cutting edges (Figure 2).
Microstructural characterization was performed before and after each dry-electropolishing step by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Carl Zeiss Neon 40, Zeiss Group, Oberkochen, Germany).

3. Results

Before polishing, pre-existing defects of the end-mill were analyzed. Figure 3 corresponds to FE-SEM micrographs of primary pre-existing defects found in the unprepared end-mill—specifically burrs (Figure 3a) and chipping (Figure 3b). These damage features were caused during the post-sintering grinding process. Such defects are primarily responsible for reducing tool life under service-like working conditions; hence, it is mandatory to improve cutting edges’ quality and minimize defects to improve tool performance [2,5].
Figure 4 displays microstructural changes in four distinct investigated areas (red rectangles in the upper image) before and after the dry-electropolishing procedure. Initial defect density decreased with increased dry-electropolishing time. However, external regions corresponding to zones 1 to 3 (Figure 4) exhibited a lower density of pre-existing damage as compared to the internal region (zone 4), as shown in Figure 3. This may be attributed to two factors: (1) the greater mobility of the electrolyte on the outer regions, and (2) the proximity of the end-mill to the cathode. The simultaneous occurrence of both effects led to a higher effective material removal rate in external regions as compared to internal ones.
Figure 5 summarizes changes in Ra as a function of time for the clearance face (region (2), as labelled in Figure 4). Two distinct trends were identified, both of which follow a linear regression, as presented in Equations (1) and (2) for trends 1 and 2, respectively.
R a = 0.452 0.144 · t
R a = 0.172 0.005 · t
where Ra and t correspond to average roughness and dry-electropolishing time, respectively. The R-squared values associated with linear fit are 0.98 and 0.99 for Equation (1) and Equation (2), respectively.
The maximum reduction in Ra occurred during the first stage (trend 1), and was linked to the higher initial roughness achieved during pre-processing. At the beginning of processing, the electrolyte easily removed roughness due to the presence of pre-existing pronounced peaks. Afterwards, the roughness removal rate diminished (trend 2) at a polishing speed of 4.5 nm/min. In that sense, after eliminating the most prominent peaks, polishing progression decelerated.
For comparison purposes, in terms of Ra, Figure 6 shows the Ra roughness profiles of the three main zones presented in Figure 5: the initial state (t = 0 min, Figure 6a), the threshold between both trends (after 2 min, Figure 6b), and when the Ra was practically stable (after 30 min of the dry-electropolishing process, Figure 6c). A ground lines reduction was clearly visible in these profiles, in agreement with SEM micrographs presented in Figure 4.
After evaluating the microstructural parameters in terms of roughness and defects as a function of dry-electropolishing time, the micro-geometrical parameters of cutting edges were evaluated, and are summarized in Figure 7.
According to Equation (3), which was derived after fitting experimental values shown in Figure 7a, the radius increased exponentially as the polishing time increased. However, the growth rate did not conform to a linear trend, as it diminished slightly over time due to the rounding effect associated with the polishing process.
Therefore, it is feasible to regulate the final radius achieved by varying dry-electropolishing durations as:
r = 26.58 18.27 · 0.95 t
where r corresponds to the cutting edge’s radius. The R-square associated with the linear fit is 0.99.
Figure 7b,c exhibit the K-factor and Sα and Sγ as functions of dry-electropolishing time, respectively. At short polishing times Sα had a larger increase compared with Sγ. However, after 3 min, it was possible to observe that both parameters (Sα and Sγ) reached a plateau, with the Sα value slightly larger than the Sγ value (Figure 7c). As a result, the K-factor stabilized and was equal to 0.75 ± 0.03, in agreement with findings reported by Droder et al. [6]. Under these conditions, the cutting edge form obtained corresponded to a waterfall K-factor, becoming more constant as the process time increased.

4. Conclusions

A dry-electropolishing method was used to prepare the cutting edges of cemented carbide end-mills. The results obtained highlight the efficiency of this technology in reducing preliminary defects inherited from the grinding process. Cutting edge radius parameters increased as dry-electropolishing time increased, achieving approximately 23 µm at 30 min of dry-electropolishing time. However, the growth rate was higher during the initial stages due to the sharp geometry presented on the cutting edge. This fact was also observed regarding roughness reduction, as well as for the other micro-geometry parameters (Sα, Sγ, and K-factor). The removal rate was larger for the clearance face than for rake faces due to the higher mobility of electrolytes, as well as their proximity to the cathode. Thus, the K-factor obtained using the dry-electropolishing process for longer durations was approximately 0.7, which corresponded to a waterfall form (K < 1). Accordingly, the micro-geometry of cutting edges can be controlled by adjusting the polishing time applied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.R.-P., A.V.-C., J.J.R. and L.L.; methodology, G.R.-P. and A.V.-C.; validation, J.J.R. and L.L.; investigation, G.R.-P. and A.V.-C.; resources, J.J.R. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.R.-P.; writing—review and editing, G.R.-P., A.V.-C., J.J.R. and L.L.; visualization, G.R.-P.; supervision, J.J.R. and L.L.; project administration, J.J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Guiomar Riu-Perdrix acknowledges funding received through the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y la Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) de España (Grant Number DIN2021-011846).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Zeppelin 3D metrology company (especially Javier Ledesma) and the Centro de Fabricación Avanzada Aeronáutica (especially Guillermo González) for conducting 3D measurements using the Infinite Focus G5 plus from Bruker Alicona.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Guiomar Riu-Perdrix, Andrea Valencia-Cadena, and Joan Josep Roa were employed by Steros GPA Innovative S.L. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. García, J.; Collado, V.; Blomqvist, A.; Kaplan, B. Cemented carbide microstructures: A review. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2009, 80, 40–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gao, P.; Liang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, T.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z. Cutting edge damage in grinding of cemented carbides micro and mills. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11331–11338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pokoeny, P.; Päoprty, B.; Vopás, T.; Peterka, J.; Vozçar, M.; Simna, V. Cutting edge radius preparation. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bassett, E.; Köhler, J.; Denkena, B. On the honed cutting-edge and its side effects during orthogonal turning operations of AISI1045 with coated WC-Co inserts. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2012, 5, 108–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Denkena, B.; Biermann, D. Cutting edge geometries. CIRP Ann. 2014, 63, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dröder, K.; Karpuschewski, B.; Uhlmann, E.; Arrabiyeh, P.A.; Berger, D.; Busemann, S.; Hartig, J.; Madanachi, N.; Mahlfeld, G.; Sommerfeld, C. A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 2020, 14, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Denkena, B.; Krödel-Worbes, A.; Beblein, S.; Hein, M. Influence of end mill manufacturing on cutting edge quality and wear behavior. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2021, 5, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Denkena, B.; Michaelis, A.; Herrmann, M.; Pötschke, J.; Krödel, A.; Vornberger, A.; Picker, T. Influence of tool material properties on the wear behavior of cemented carbide tools with rounded cutting edges. Wear 2020, 52, 203395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, K.; Liang, Y.; Zheng, K. Tool edge radius effect on cutting temperature in micro-end-milling process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 52, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Padmakumar, M.; Shiva Predeep, N. Effect of cutting edge form factor (K-factor) on the performance of a face a milling tool. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 31, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dankena, B.; Lucas, A.; Bassett, E. Effects of the cutting edge microgeometry on tool wear and its thermos-mechanical load. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 60, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fulemová, J.; Řehoř, J. Influence of form factor of the cutting edge on tool life during finishing milling. Prod. Eng. 2015, 100, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kennedy, D.M.; Vahey, J.; Hanney, D. Micro shot blasting of machine tools for improving surface finish and reducing cutting forces in manufacturing. Mater. Des. 2005, 26, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Denkena, B.; Köhler, J.; Breidenstein, B.; Abrão, A.M.; Ventura, C.E.H. Influence of the cutting edge preparation method on characteristics and performance of PVD coated carbide inserts in hard turning. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 254, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bouzakis, K.-D.; Michailidis, N.; Skordaris, G.; Kombogiannis, S.; Hadjiyiannis, S.; Efstathiou, K.; Pavlidou, E.; Erkens, G.; Rambdr, S.; Wirth, I. Optimization of the cutting edge roundness and its manufacturing procedures of cemented carbide inserts, to improve their milling performance after PVD coating deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 163–164, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riu-Perdrix, G.; Slawik, S.; Mücklich, F.; Llanes, L.; Roa, J.J. Influence of Different Shaping and Finishing Processes on the Surface Integrity of WC-Co Cemented Carbides. Metals 2024, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) A 3D reconstruction and (b) a schematic representation of the cutting edge micro-geometry and key parameters investigated here.
Figure 1. (a) A 3D reconstruction and (b) a schematic representation of the cutting edge micro-geometry and key parameters investigated here.
Jmmp 08 00028 g001
Figure 2. (a) A 3D cutting edge reconstruction, (b) 50 cutting edges’ measured profiles, and (c) a representation of one measured profile.
Figure 2. (a) A 3D cutting edge reconstruction, (b) 50 cutting edges’ measured profiles, and (c) a representation of one measured profile.
Jmmp 08 00028 g002
Figure 3. FE-SEM micrographs of pre-existing defects: (a) burrs and (b) chipping.
Figure 3. FE-SEM micrographs of pre-existing defects: (a) burrs and (b) chipping.
Jmmp 08 00028 g003
Figure 4. FE-SEM micrographs of each investigated zone’s evolution as a function of time.
Figure 4. FE-SEM micrographs of each investigated zone’s evolution as a function of time.
Jmmp 08 00028 g004
Figure 5. Ra evolution as a function of time for the clearance zone.
Figure 5. Ra evolution as a function of time for the clearance zone.
Jmmp 08 00028 g005
Figure 6. Ra profiles in three different zones along the Ra trends presented in Figure 5: (a) initial states, (b) at 2 min, and (c) after 30 min of dry-electropolishing process.
Figure 6. Ra profiles in three different zones along the Ra trends presented in Figure 5: (a) initial states, (b) at 2 min, and (c) after 30 min of dry-electropolishing process.
Jmmp 08 00028 g006
Figure 7. Cutting edges’ parameters evolutions as a function of time for (a) radius, (b) K-factor, and (c) Sα (black symbols) and Sγ (red symbols). The dashed line marks the trend change in K-factor values.
Figure 7. Cutting edges’ parameters evolutions as a function of time for (a) radius, (b) K-factor, and (c) Sα (black symbols) and Sγ (red symbols). The dashed line marks the trend change in K-factor values.
Jmmp 08 00028 g007
Table 1. Summary of initial values in terms of geometrical parameters (diameter (Ø), number of blades, helix angle, cutting edge radius (r), cutting edge segment on clearance face (Sα), cutting edge segment on rake face (Sγ), and K-factor) and the average roughness parameter (Ra).
Table 1. Summary of initial values in terms of geometrical parameters (diameter (Ø), number of blades, helix angle, cutting edge radius (r), cutting edge segment on clearance face (Sα), cutting edge segment on rake face (Sγ), and K-factor) and the average roughness parameter (Ra).
Ø (mm)BladesHelix Angle (°)r (µm)Sα (µm)Sγ (µm)K-FactorRa (µm)
104487.9 ± 0.212.2 ± 0.311.9 ± 0.61.0 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riu-Perdrix, G.; Valencia-Cadena, A.; Llanes, L.; Roa, J.J. Cemented Carbide End-Mill Edge Preparation Using Dry-Electropolishing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8010028

AMA Style

Riu-Perdrix G, Valencia-Cadena A, Llanes L, Roa JJ. Cemented Carbide End-Mill Edge Preparation Using Dry-Electropolishing. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2024; 8(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riu-Perdrix, Guiomar, Andrea Valencia-Cadena, Luis Llanes, and Joan Josep Roa. 2024. "Cemented Carbide End-Mill Edge Preparation Using Dry-Electropolishing" Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 8, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8010028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop