Next Article in Journal
The Potential Role of Blood Biomarkers in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: An Expert Opinion
Previous Article in Journal
The L-Dopa Story: Translational Neuroscience Ante Verbum
 
 
Clinical and Translational Neuroscience is published by MDPI from Volume 5 Issue 2 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with SAGE.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The International Brain Commission (1903–1914): Dutch and Swiss Perspective (Towards Neurosciences beyond Borders)

by
Caroline Jagella
1,2,* and
Peter J Koehler
1
1
Zuyderland Medical Center, 6419 PC Heerlen, The Netherlands
2
RehaClinic Kilchberg, Grütstrasse 60, 8802 Kilchberg, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2018, 2(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x18767465
Submission received: 24 September 2017 / Accepted: 19 February 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018

Abstract

We wish to highlight the political impact of neuroscientific societies as forums of cross-border communication from a historical point of view. We trace the efforts of Constantin von Monakow, a founder of Swiss Neurology, and Cornelis Winkler, one of the primary figures in the early years of Dutch neurology and psychiatry, to shape their medical fields in their countries of residence. The foundation of the International Brain Commission and the failing of its continuation after World War I is reflected by the struggle to constitute the Swiss Neurological Society and the Netherlands Society of Neurology and Psychiatry and to develop their specialties along with new scientific findings in brain research. How both neuroscientists, from politically neutral countries, set different focuses concerning future developments of their societies, as well as their specialties, raises important questions about the role of neurosciences in society and were discussed by neuroscientists between the wars: Von Monakow tried to emphasize the moral meaning of knowledge about the human brain, whereas Winkler was convinced that neurology should focus on scientific issues in the traditional way, without bringing moral or societal implications to the fore. The journal Swiss Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, founded by Constantin von Monakow in 1917, represents a successful attempt to establish an organ of scientific communication against the background of challenging political circumstances.
Keywords: Constantin von Monakow; Cornelis Winkler; International Brain Commission; diaschisis; politics of neurosciences; history of neurosciences; Swiss Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry; International Brain Research Organization Constantin von Monakow; Cornelis Winkler; International Brain Commission; diaschisis; politics of neurosciences; history of neurosciences; Swiss Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry; International Brain Research Organization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jagella, C.; Koehler, P.J. The International Brain Commission (1903–1914): Dutch and Swiss Perspective (Towards Neurosciences beyond Borders). Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2018, 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x18767465

AMA Style

Jagella C, Koehler PJ. The International Brain Commission (1903–1914): Dutch and Swiss Perspective (Towards Neurosciences beyond Borders). Clinical and Translational Neuroscience. 2018; 2(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x18767465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jagella, Caroline, and Peter J Koehler. 2018. "The International Brain Commission (1903–1914): Dutch and Swiss Perspective (Towards Neurosciences beyond Borders)" Clinical and Translational Neuroscience 2, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x18767465

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop