Next Article in Journal
Factors Determining the Decision to Initiate nCPAP Therapy in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
Previous Article in Journal
Holter ECG Monitoring during Research Bronchofiberoscopy in Patients with Asthma
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Response to Exercise in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

by
Tadeusz Przybyłowski
*,
Piotr Bielecki
,
Marta Kumor
,
Katarzyna Hildebrand
,
Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska
,
Joanna Wiwała
,
Justyna Kościuch
,
Piotr Korczyński
and
Ryszarda Chazan
Katedra i Klinika Chorób Wewnętrznych, Pneumonologii i Alergologii, AM w Warszawie, Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2006, 74(1), 39-44; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28067
Submission received: 1 March 2006 / Revised: 1 March 2006 / Accepted: 1 March 2006 / Published: 1 March 2006

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients are at risk of cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the response to symptom limited exercise test. Methods: twenty nine OSAS patients (1 F, 28 M), mean age 50.7 ± 9.7 yrs with body mass index of 32.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2 participated in the study. OSAS was diagnosed by overnight polysomnography. Incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a treadmill was performed twice: before and after 2–3 weeks of regular treatment with CPAP. Results: mean apnea + hypopnea index (AHI) before therapy was 57.6 ± 12 h−1. CPAP treatment did not change peak oxygen consumption (VO2max) (38.3 ± 9.0 vs. 38.9 ± 6.9 mlO2/kg/min, p = ns) or peak heart rate (153.4 ± 21 min−1 vs. 155.5 ± 22 min−1, p = ns). There were no significant changes in ventilation or gas exchange variables. However, a decrease in peak systolic blood pressure from 194.5 ± 24 mmHg to 186.7 ± 27.9 mmHg (p < 0.05) with CPAP treatment was found. During recovery a decrease in heart rate (at 1st minute and minutes 3–6) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (minutes 4–7) with CPAP treatment was observed. Significant correlations between VO2max and AHI (r = −0.38, p < 0.05); MAP at peak exercise and: AHI, mean oxygen saturation (SaO2) during sleep, minutes of sleep with SaO2 < 90% (T90); MAP at recovery (minutes 3–8) and T90 before CPAP treatment were also noted. Conclusions: OSAS patients are not limited on exercise. Treatment with nasal CPAP attenuates circulatory response to incremental exercise on a treadmill.
Keywords: obstructive sleep apnea; stress test; polysomnography; CPAP obstructive sleep apnea; stress test; polysomnography; CPAP

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Przybyłowski, T.; Bielecki, P.; Kumor, M.; Hildebrand, K.; Maskey-Warzęchowska, M.; Wiwała, J.; Kościuch, J.; Korczyński, P.; Chazan, R. Influence of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Response to Exercise in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Adv. Respir. Med. 2006, 74, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28067

AMA Style

Przybyłowski T, Bielecki P, Kumor M, Hildebrand K, Maskey-Warzęchowska M, Wiwała J, Kościuch J, Korczyński P, Chazan R. Influence of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Response to Exercise in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2006; 74(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Przybyłowski, Tadeusz, Piotr Bielecki, Marta Kumor, Katarzyna Hildebrand, Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska, Joanna Wiwała, Justyna Kościuch, Piotr Korczyński, and Ryszarda Chazan. 2006. "Influence of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Response to Exercise in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 74, no. 1: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop