Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Latent Infection with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Mazowieckie Province Using Interferon Gamma Release Assay after Stimulation with Specific Antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Comorbidities on the Length of Hospital Treatment in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Usefulness of Selected Tests in the Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

by
Katarzyna Hildebrand
*,
Tadeusz Przybyłowski
,
Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska
and
Ryszarda Chazan
Department of Internal Diseases, Pulmonology and Allergology of the Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a St., 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2011, 79(6), 397-406; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27623
Submission received: 4 March 2011 / Revised: 25 October 2011 / Accepted: 25 October 2011 / Published: 25 October 2011

Abstract

Introduction: Indirect airway challenge tests are commonly used in the diagnostics of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), defined as a post-exercise decrease in FEV1 ≥ 10%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of bronchial hyperreactivity tests in the diagnosis of EIB. Material and methods: Forty-two subjects were allocated into 3 groups: A—19 steroid-naive asthma patients; D—11 non-asthma patients reporting symptoms suggestive of EIB (dyspnoea, wheezing, and cough provoked by exercise); and K—12 healthy controls. Subjects filled a questionnaire regarding symptoms related to exercise and underwent: inhaled bronchial challenge to methacholine (Mch), adenosine 5’-monophosphate (AMP), and exercise challenge on a treadmill. With a cut-off of ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% decrease in FEV1, EIB was diagnosed in 47% and 37% of asthma patients, respectively. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was found in 27% of subjects in group D and in none of the controls, irrespectively of the FEV1 criterion. Results: The analysis of the questionnaire revealed that a single symptom cannot be used to predict EIB. Symptoms occurring after termination of exercise, but not during exercise, characterize EIB more precisely. The analysis showed that the most useful measure to diagnose EIB can be a combination of bronchial challenge to AMP and typical symptoms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (i.e., dyspnoea, wheezing, and coughing provoked by exercise) with a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 94%, PPV of 78%, NPV of 91%, and LR of 11.2. Conclusions: Symptoms suggestive of EIB do not have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The most useful measure to diagnose EIB is the combination of typical symptoms of EIB with a positive challenge to AMP.
Keywords: asthma; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; bronchial challenge tests asthma; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; bronchial challenge tests

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hildebrand, K.; Przybyłowski, T.; Maskey-Warzęchowska, M.; Chazan, R. Usefulness of Selected Tests in the Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction. Adv. Respir. Med. 2011, 79, 397-406. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27623

AMA Style

Hildebrand K, Przybyłowski T, Maskey-Warzęchowska M, Chazan R. Usefulness of Selected Tests in the Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2011; 79(6):397-406. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27623

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hildebrand, Katarzyna, Tadeusz Przybyłowski, Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska, and Ryszarda Chazan. 2011. "Usefulness of Selected Tests in the Diagnosis of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 79, no. 6: 397-406. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27623

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop