Business Impact Analysis of AMM Data: A Case Study
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is an exhaustive presentation and case study of the BIA analysis and a highly detailed step by step walkthrough of AMM system of ČEZ Distribuce. The presentation is very case specific and this reduces the scope and interest.
It is hard to follow the paper and understand the novelty of the work as it seems like a detailed and canonical implementation of methodology, down to listing potential violation codes. Authors should consider replacing repetitive analysis with key requirements and points and include consolidating tables and a system overview figure and a risk mapping table with interest that would be useful for a 4.0 case and of interest to a larger audience. Length of paper is also too long.
Section 2 should be significantly shortened/further summarised/prioritised. The connection of section 2 with the rest of the paper is a bit loose.
Please fix:
Some minor formatting issues in the abstract
Figure 1. This is a figure. Schemes follow the same formatting. (171)
BLOK initially becomes BLOCK
Section 5 conclusions is hard to read, it's a listing of requirements within long sentences. I d opt for a either a higher level analysis or a more selective presentation of key requirements.
Authors should confirm that there are no confidentiality issues with ČEZ Distribuce for publishing details of their system.
Author Response
Dear Opponent,
thank you for your objective opinion. Based on the comments from you and your colleagues, I have made the necessary changes to the text of the article and have made an honest effort to address your insightful comments.
Trust that the revised text will meet your requirements and you will be satisfied with the settlement. Partial comments are included in the attached file.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
· The paper offers a unique view of the AMM system as an integral part of modern Smart Grid networks using a data-driven perspective, which al-lows for the subsequent implementation and fulfilment of security requirements in accordance with ISO/IEC 27001 and national security standards.
· Problems in smart grid needs to be outlined appropriately in section 1.
· Security aspect of smart grid and AMM needs to be discussed in the manuscript. Refer to the following. Preventing and Detecting Intrusion of Cyberattacks in Smart Grid by Integrating Blockchain; Classification and analysis of security attacks in WSNs and IEEE 802.15.4 standards : A survey.
· Works discussed in the literature review section needs to be summarized in the form of a table. Authors must highlight the major contribution of these works.
· Section 3.2 “The aggregation principle” must be discussed appropriately in more detail.
· Section 4 looks weak. Discuss the proposed methodology in more detail.
· Motivation behind the work needs to be outlined in section 1. Furthermore, the problem statement needs to be elaborated.
· Section 3 and 5 of the manuscript is well written and much appreciated. Authors must add some future research directions.
Minor editing of English language required
Author Response
Dear Opponent,
thank you for your objective opinion. Based on the comments from you and your colleagues, I have made the necessary changes to the text of the article and have made an honest effort to address your insightful comments.
Trust that the revised text will meet your requirements and you will be satisfied with the settlement. Partial comments are included in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
The article seems carefully prepared. The content is technical and engineering in nature. In my opinion, the following minor additions could be considered. I am asking the author to respond to the following issues:
Optional: In my opinion, the title of the article is a bit "dated", "boring, ordinary". I suggest you rethink the title and look for a different version - more intriguing and encouraging the reader. For consideration. Please comment.
1) What is the purpose of the work? In addition to the purpose of the work, please present the research gap in a better way. How does this research fill a research gap? Please comment.
2) What's new in this article? What new has this research discovered, and how does it add to the world literature? What is the main contribution of this research? What is the main conclusion of this research? Please comment.
3) Lines 61-62: I quote: In this area, the possibilities of using artificial intelligence are also tattooed, as reported in [8, 9].
What does it mean that numbers [8 and 9] inform about something, report something? In my opinion, this should be rephrased to include the names of the authors of the studies, e.g. "John and Bowl [8,9] report that..."
3a) Rulers 56-57: I quote: "A significant risk for a new AMM-based system is cybersecurity, as reported in [5, 6, 7] and ." - a) something is missing here (?), b) in my opinion it should be rephrased, e.g. "John and Bowl [8,9] report that..."
Author Response
Dear Opponent,
thank you for your objective opinion. Based on the comments from you and your colleagues, I have made the necessary changes to the text of the article and have made an honest effort to address your insightful comments.
Trust that the revised text will meet your requirements and you will be satisfied with the settlement. Partial comments are included in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Thank you for your efforts in addressing my comments.
I find the corrections helpful for the reading of the paper.
Author Response
Dear Opponent,
Thank you for your comments and suggestions in the rough round of revisions to my article. I have honestly and with my best efforts tried to incorporate the changes and suggestions you requested. A comprehensive revision of formatting, language, and other sub-completions has been made.
I believe that this revised and fine-tuned article will already meet all your expectations.
Reviewer 2 Report
Section 2 looks below par.
Separate the literature review section from the materials and methods.
Also, discuss the cited works in literature in more detail highlighting the major contributions of the work.
Results and Discussion section needs to be significantly ameliorated.
Satisfactory
Author Response
Dear Opponent,
Thank you for your comments and suggestions in the rough round of revisions to my article. I have honestly and with my best efforts tried to incorporate the changes and suggestions you requested. Partial changes are listed in the attached file and then highlighted in green throughout the text. The edits have been implemented to reflect as much as possible your requests as well as those of other opponents. At the same time, a clompex revision of formatting, language, and other subcomments has been made.
I believe that this revised and fine-tuned article will already meet all your expectations.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
